ISSN: 2469-9837
+44 1478 350008
Alexander Jimmefors, Danilo Garcia, Patricia Rosenberg, Fariba Mousavi, Lillemor Adrianson and Trevor Archer
The purpose of the present study was to examine high school adolescent pupils? self-regulatory strategies in relation to psychological well-being and subjective well-being (i.e., temporal life satisfaction and affect) using the affective profiles model as the backdrop for the analysis. Participants were categorized into Self-fulfilling (high positive, low negative), High affective (high positive, high negative), Low affective (low positive, low negative) and Self-destructive (low positive, high negative) profiles according to their responses on the Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule. The participants also self-reported self-regulation (?assessment? and ?locomotion?), temporal life satisfaction (past, present and future) and psychological well-being (e.g. Self-acceptance, environmental mastery, personal growth). Self-fulfilling adolescents, in contrast to Self-destructive adolescents, expressed high levels of temporal life satisfaction and psychological well-being. The self-regulatory ?locomotion? dimension was associated to high positive affect profiles, higher life satisfaction and psychological well-being whereas the self-regulatory ?assessment? dimension was associated with high negative affect profiles, lesser life satisfaction and psychological well-being. Taken together, the well-being outcomes linked to the ?locomotion? dimension seem to contribute to an upward ?spiral of empowerment?, reinforcing approaching or agentic behavior; while the outcome linked to the ?assessment? dimension appear to consist of a downward ?spiral of disempowerment? or inaction.