Pediatrics & Therapeutics
Open Access

A Brief Note on Connection between Child Development and Mother-Child Interactions

Catherine Leonard^{* *}Correspondence: Catherine Leonard, Department of General Pediatrics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States, Email:

Author info »

Description

In Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs), 45% of preschool-aged children are in danger of poor child development and 25% are stunted. Community-based interventions integrating responsive care, stimulation, nutrition and health parts delivered to parents are recognized as effective methods to boost kid growth and development in early life. Evidence suggests that interventions providing multiple inputs are required to improve multiple child outcomes instead of interventions providing individual inputs or the standard of care (World Health Organization, 2020). Though evidence on what interventions work to improve child growth and development is increasing, less is thought regarding how these interventions operate, the particular aspects of nurturing care these interventions profit, and whether or not these advantages translate into improved child outcomes.

Child diet will have an effect on psychological development both directly through brain development during infancy, and indirectly by affecting child health, physical activity, and caregiver behaviour. Though nutrition interventions will improve both linear growth and, to a lesser extent, child development, it's unclear whether or not these impacts are achieved primarily through child diet or whether or not alternative mechanisms, like caregiver behaviour, also are at work. Restricted proof from Asian countries suggests that child diet mediates the effects of nutrition interventions on child growth and development. Further, a recent study in Kenya showed that child diet at the side of parental stimulation; maternal knowledge and recall of intervention messages mediate the consequences of a responsive stimulation and nutrition intervention on child psychological features and receptive language development [1]. However, to our information, no studies have assessed whether or not responsive stimulation interventions in LMICs work to improve child growth and development completely through child diet.

Maternal responsive behaviours and developmentally appropriate and supportive mother-child interactions are necessary for child health, nutrition, and development in earlylife. Responsive interactions involve a three-step process: observation of the child's signals, interpretation of those signals, and action/response to fulfil the child’s signals acceptable for the developmental age of the child. A caregiver can also demonstrate a spread of developmentally supportive interactions, that don't seem to be essentially responsive but nurture development (e.g., directive interactions, language inputs). Given the advanced nature of maternal responsive behaviours, culturally relevant measures with tested reliability and validity to be used in LMICs are restricted and no gold standard of measure responsive behaviours exists [2].

Because the ‘interpretation’ step of the method is difficult to look at, most measures concentrate on the child's signals and maternal responses. The few studies in LMICs that have collected data on caregiver-child interactions tend to comprehend each maternal responsive behaviours and supportive mother-child interactions, which are usually assessed in a picture book-reading context. Proof from these studies suggests that enhancements in mother-child interactions mediate the positive effects of parenting and responsive stimulation interventions on child growth and development. Additionally, restricted evidence indicates that mother-child interactions mediate the consequences of nutrition interventions in early life on child growth at five years of age. Whether or not mother-child interactions mediate the effect of responsive stimulation and nutrition interventions in LMICs has not been through empirically tested in children less than 2 years of age.

Understanding however multi-input interventions win impact on child outcomes will facilitate increased intervention effectiveness by investing common and reciprocally reinforcing mechanisms. Therefore, in the present study, we have a tendency to soughtafter to deepen information relating to the mechanisms through which those multi-input interventions in LMICs might have an effect on kid outcomes in the early file [3-5]. Specifically, we have used data from the Asian country Early Child Development Scale-up intervention trial to explore child diet and mother-child interactions at 1 year of age as potential mediators that may explain the consequences of a responsive stimulation andnutrition intervention on child growth and development at 2 years of age.

Our findings build upon previous PEDS work by demonstrating that child diet and mother-child interactions mediate intervention effects on kid growth and development within the 1st two years of life. Previous PEDS studies showed that maternal psychological state and parental stimulation were alternative mechanisms through which the intervention worked. Taking these findings along, the PEDS interventions helped build a facultative and nurturing atmosphere that directly benefited mothers and their children throughout the intervention implementation periods and after the intervention was over. These findings recommend that similar sorts of multiinput integrated RS and EN interventions will function as a platform to modify, empower, and support caregivers, that successively will improve not only child growth and development but also kid wellbeing more generally and also the overall conditions during which children grow up. Future interventions in LMICs should concentrate on holistic approaches, which aim to boost multiple aspects of nurturing care instead of on individual child outcomes.

References

1. Aboud FE, Singla DR, Nahil MI, Borisova I. Effectiveness of a parenting program in Bangladesh to address early childhood health, growth and development. Soc Sci Med. 2013;97: 250-258.

   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

2. Aboud FE, Yousafzai AK. Global health and development in early childhood. Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 66(1): 433-457.

   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

3. Bentley ME, Wasser HM, Creed-Kanashiro HM. Responsive Feeding and child undernutrition in low- and middle-income countries. J Nutr. 2011;141(3): 502-507.

   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

4. Black MM, Aboud FE. (2011). Responsive feeding is embedded in a theoretical framework of responsive parenting. J Nutr. 2011;141(3): 490-494.

   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

5. Brown JL, Pollitt E. Malnutrition, poverty and intellectual development. Sci Am. 1996;274(2); 38-43.

   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]