Organic Chemistry: Current Research
Open Access

A Brief Note on Counting Electrons

Sandhya Kille^{* *}Correspondence: Sandhya Kille, Department of Chemistry, Acharya Nagarjuna University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India, Email:

Author info »

Brief Report

A framework for identifying compounds and describing or predicting electronic structure and bonding is electron counting. Many chemistry laws are based on electron counting: For main group elements, particularly the lighter ones like carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen, the octet rule is utilised. Hückel's rule for the -electrons of aromatic compounds in inorganic chemistry and organometallic chemistry of transition metals, Wade's laws for polyhedral cluster compounds, including transition metals and main group elements like boron, as well as polyhedral skeletal electron pair theory for cluster compounds, including transition metals and major group elements like boron.

When atoms have too few electrons in comparison to their respective rules, they are called "electron-deficient," and when they have too many electrons, they are called "hypervalent." Because these compounds are more reactive than those that follow their rule, electron counting is a useful tool for determining a molecule's reactivity.

The 18 Electron Rule is a valuable method for predicting organometallic complex structure and reactivity. In a simplified logic, it represents the central metal's inclination to achieve the noble gas configuration in its valence shell, and is somewhat akin to the octet rule. Depending on the energy and type of atomic and molecular orbitals, there are exceptions to this norm.

Counting guidelines

There are two prevalent ways for counting electrons, both of which get the same result.

The neutral counting method presupposes that the molecule or fragment under investigation is made up entirely of covalent bonds. Malcolm Green popularized it, along with the L and X ligand nomenclature. It is often thought to be simpler, particularly for low-valent transition metals [Requires citation].

The "ionic counting" method implies that atoms are only connected by ionic bonds. Both procedures can be used to double-check one's calculations.

However, it's vital to remember that most chemical species fall somewhere between the completely covalent and ionic extremes.

Counting in a neutral manner

One is added for each halide or other anionic ligand that forms a sigma bond with the central atom.

For each lone pair connecting to the metal, two are added (e.g. each Lewis base binds with a lone pair). Lewis bases are unsaturated hydrocarbons such as alkenes and alkynes. Likewise, Lewis and Bronsted acids (protons) have no effect. For each homoelement bond, one is added. For each negative charge, one is added, and for each positive charge, one is withdrawn.

Counting ions

The number of electrons in an element is calculated using this approach, which assumes an oxidation state. For example, a Fe²⁺ atom possesses 6 electrons. S₂ has eight electrons.

Every halide or other anionic ligand that forms a sigma bond with the metal is multiplied by two. Each carbon atom attaching to the metal adds one electron to unsaturated ligands like alkenes "Extraordinary circumstances".

The number of electrons "donated" by some ligands is determined by the metal-ligand ensemble's shape. The M–NO entity is an example of this complexity. The NO ligand is termed a threeelectron ligand when this grouping is linear. When the M– NO subunit bends substantially at N, the NO is regarded as a pseudohalide and so becomes a one-electron compound (in the neutral counting approach). The scenario is similar to that of the 3 allyl vs the 1 allyl. Sulfur dioxide is another unique ligand in terms of electron counting.