Poultry, Fisheries & Wildlife Sciences

Poultry, Fisheries & Wildlife Sciences
Open Access

ISSN: 2375-446X

+44-77-2385-9429

Research Article - (2014) Volume 2, Issue 1

A Retrospective Study of Poultry Diseases Diagnosed in Maiduguri, North-East, Nigeria

Arhyel G Balami1*, Ndahi JJ2, Zaifada AU2, Mustapha M1, Jarafu DJ3, Asogwa NT1 and Hajara S1
1Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Maiduguri, Nigeria
2Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Maiduguri, Nigeria
3Polons Agro investment Limited, Lagos, Nigeria
*Corresponding Author: Arhyel G Balami, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Maiduguri, Bama Road, P.M.B 1069, Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria, Tel: 2348067703103 Email:

Abstract

A nine year (2004-2012) retrospective study of clinical records of poultry diseases presented to the poultry unit of the University of Maiduguri Veterinary Teaching Hospital (UMVTH) and the State Veterinary Hospital (SVH) Maiduguri, was conducted. Out of a total of 2,317 cases recorded, viral diseases accounted for 1461 (63.1%) cases, bacterial diseases were 580 (25%), parasitic diseases were 236 (10.2%) while 40 (1.7%) of the cases were noninfectious. Newcastle disease (ND) was the most recorded disease with 851 (36.7%) cases, followed by Infectious bursal disease (IBD) with 380 (16.4%) cases while helminthosis were the least recorded diseases with 11 (0.5%) cases and Marek’s disease was not recorded throughout the study period. Most diseases occurred during the rainy season (56.3%) when compared to dry season (43.7%). Years 2005 and 2009 recorded the lowest (167) and highest (592) occurrence of disease respectively. Poor management practices by the farmers in addition to lack of awareness on diagnostic laboratory services may be associated with the distribution pattern of cases recorded in the hospitals. Control and prevention strategies can only be successful after a careful assessment of each condition.

<

Keywords: Infectious bursal disease; Newcastle disease; Coccidiosis; Fowl typhoid; Maiduguri

Introduction

Poultry production in Nigeria is an important component of the livestock sub-sector and has developed to the level of commercial enterprise involving thousands of birds that provide employment, income, animal protein for urban and rural dwellers as well as manure for crop production. It is an important instrument for alleviating problems associated with poverty in Nigeria (food security and malnutrition) and significantly contributes to women’s income and helps meet some levels of household protein needs [1]. Small holder poultry farmers that operate various production strategies provide the bulk of poultry meat and eggs for the populace [2]. Abdu et al. [3] identified diseases as major constraints in the development of the poultry industry in Nigeria thus causing a huge loss to farmers. Major diseases of poultry in Nigeria that have been predominantly identified in commercial poultry are Newcastle Disease (ND), Infectious Bursal Disease (IBD) or Gumboro. Others include marek disease (MD), Fowl typhoid, Fowl cholera, Mycoplasmosis and Coccidiosis [4]. Although analysis of poultry diseases has been conducted earlier on in the state by Ambali et al. [5], the authors wish to determine the recent distribution of poultry diseases diagnosed over a nine year period (2004-2012) in Maiduguri and suggest possible control measures to the problems.

Materials and Methods

Study area

All the cases studied were presented to veterinary clinics located in Maiduguri, a city situated between 11° 32’N and 11° 40’N and longitudes 13° 32’E and located between the Sudan savannah and Sahel savannah vegetation zones [6].

Data collection

Clinical records of cases diagnosed at the Poultry Clinics of the University of Maiduguri Veterinary Teaching Hospital (UMVTH) and the State Veterinary Hospital (SVH), Maiduguri, Nigeria, were obtained from January 2004 to December, 2012. These data were analysed with regard to condition of disease and season. A case was defined as a farm that reported an outbreak of a disease and was diagnosed based on history, clinical signs, postmortem findings, and laboratory results. The results of the analyses were determined and presented as percentage distribution in tabular forms.

Results

A total of 2,317 cases of poultry diseases were documented during the nine years study period, giving an average of 257.4 cases annually (Table 1).

Diseases 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total (%)
Viral diseases (63.1%)
ND 74 60 33 49 101 199 161 113 61 851(36.7)
IBD 33 37 30 39 58 67 51 44 21 380(16.4)
Fowl pox 17 20 11 11 6 7 1 0 0 73(3.2)
Marek’s disease 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0(0)
Mycoplasmosis 3 2 5 15 16 68 46 1 1 157(6.8)
Avian influenza 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0(0)
Parasitic diseases (10.2%)
Coccidiosis 17 17 14 22 39 83 16 7 5 220(9.5)
Helminthosis 0 0 0 3 2 3 3 0 0 11(0.5)
Ectoparasitism 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 0 5(0.2)
Bacterial diseases (25%)
Pasteurellosis 0 0 5 10 8 16 1 0 0 40(1.7)
Colibacillosis 7 8 4 19 17 63 48 49 29 244(10.5)
Fowl typhoid 7 12 15 13 16 29 21 13 5 131(5.7)
Fowl cholera 8 5 2 27 8 16 0 3 0 69(2.9)
Pullorum disease 2 2 3 4 3 1 1 0 0 16(0.7)
Necrotic enteritis 5 4 2 9 7 27 10 14 2 80(3.5)
Non infectious
Diseases (1.7%) 0 0 6 3 8 12 11 0 0 40(1.7)
Total 173 167 131 224 290 592 372 244 124 2317 (100)

Table 1: Prevalence observed on reported cases of Poultry diseases in Maiduguri, Borno State from January 2004 to December 2012.

Among the viral diseases reported and diagnosed in the two hospitals, Newcastle disease (ND) has the highest occurrence (36.7%) followed by Infectious Bursal Disease (IBD) (16.4%). However, no case of Marek’s disease was diagnosed within the period under study. Collibacillosis had the highest rate of occurrence (10.5%) among the bacterial diseases diagnosed, followed by fowl typhoid (5.7%) while Pullorum disease were least reported (0.7%). Of all the parasitic diseases diagnosed, coccidiosis occurred more (9.5%) than helminthosis (0.5%) and ectoparasitism (0.2%) and non-infectious diseases only accounted for 1.7% of the cases reported. In all, viral diseases are the most (63.1%) diagnosed diseases followed by bacterial diseases (25%), while noninfectious diseases were the least diagnosed (1.7%).

Discussion

The result of the present study showed an increase in the prevalence of disease when compared to previous reports by Ambali et al. [5]. For instance the prevalence of ND in the present study was higher (36.7%) compared to previous reports of Abdu et al. [7]. This increase has remained relatively steady for the nine year period under study. The steady increase in the number of cases diagnosed from 2007 to 2009 could probably be due to the media advertisement on avian influenza and the need for reporting of cases of flock mortalities [8,9], while the decrease thereafter could be as a result of the insurgency that befall the state during the study period which militated against clients freedom of movement that may warrant low case turnout to the clinics. The absence of a report on Marek’s disease is contrary to the 8.3% prevalence reported in Zaria during the same period [10]. This may likely be associated with the type of birds raised in this area, Mareks is associated with birds reared for longer periods such as layers, whereas in Maiduguri, most of the birds reared are broilers which are kept for short period (8 weeks).

Viral diseases (such as Newcastle disease and Infectious bursal disease) being the most diagnosed poultry disease in the two hospitals are in agreement with an earlier study done in the state by Ambali et al. [5], where the authors reported ND and IBD as the two major viral diseases diagnosed. However, Newcastle disease which has a higher prevalence in this report is considered the most economically important avian viral disease in the world including developing countries due to its devastating effect on the poultry industry [10,11]. Newcastle disease can produce mortality of up to 100% among infected population of birds [12,13] and unfortunately the prognosis is poor once birds are infected. This created the reason for the alarming frequent reports to the clinics. El-Yuguda and Baba [14] reported ND to be the greatest threat to poultry industry in the study area, therefore the need for frequent all year round routine vaccination against ND in the State in order to conquer the threat presented by ND so as to prevent epizootics. It is known that vaccination of poultry provides an excellent means to lessen clinical signs of infection caused by virulent ND virus [15-17]. There are several possible reasons for low level of protection in birds, such as poor vaccine quality, unsuitable vaccination schedule or vaccination techniques, impaired immunecompetence due to immunosuppressive substances in the feed or to immunosuppressive diseases, and therefore, unable to protect birds from ND virus infection [18]. In a similar report, ND was reported to be the most frequently diagnosed poultry disease (32.3%) in Zaria [19], though the finding in the present study may be slightly higher (36.7%) for ND than the report from Zaria, but the difference is not significant statistically. Infectious bursal disease is the second most frequent poultry viral disease that were reported and recorded at the Veterinary clinics in the study area with the prevalence rate of 16.4%, while IBD was reported to be the most frequently diagnosed disease in Sokoto (32.9%) [20]. The occurrence of IBD is most common in young birds and the disease has been reported to be a highly contagious avian viral disease especially in young birds [21].

The prevalence of fowl pox as recorded is 3.2%. The disease is usually diagnosed according to the appearance of cutaneous lesions and the prevalence is low in this study area. This agrees with the worldwide physical diagnosis of avian pox virus infections at a tentative level as reported by Afonso et al. [22] and Fallavena et al. [23]. Mycoplasmosis is also an important disease of veterinary concern, although its report to the clinics in the study area is low at the rate of 6.5%. But the fact that mortality due entirely to mycoplasmosis is negligible, it is important to veterinarians because it predisposes affected birds to other disease producing organisms as reported by Agrilnfo [24]. There has been no report of outbreaks of neither highly pathogenic avian influenza nor any of its mild form in the study area.

Among the bacterial diseases of poultry recorded in the study area, Colibacillosis and Fowl typhoid are the most frequently reported and recorded avian bacterial disease with a prevalent rate of 244 (10.5%) and 131 (5.7%) respectively. This concise with similar reports by Wigley et al. [25] and Berchieri et al. [26] that stated that avian Colibacillosis and Salmonellosis are considered to be the major bacterial disease problems in the poultry industry worldwide and that these disease constitute a major public burden and represent a significant cost in many developing countries including Nigeria. Although Colibacillosis has been reported to be a major infectious disease in birds at all ages, ND or infectious bronchitis (IB) as well as nutritional deficiencies can predispose the birds to both Collibacillosis and Salmonellosis [27].

Necrotic enteritis was also reported to have a low prevalence of 3.5% in the study area. This disease has been reported to be the most common and financially bacterial disease in modern broiler flock [17,28,29]. The disease is a complex, multifactorial disease with many unknown factors influencing its occurrence and the severity of outbreaks. However, the occurrence of Nercrotic enteritis is often associated with an outbreak of coccidial infection.

The protozoan disease of clinical consideration in this area is Coccidiosis. The prevalence is similar to that reported by Bukar-Kolo et al. [30]. The fact that the organism is ubiquitous, they are everywhere chickens are reared [31]. A severe attack of coccidiosis can however cause weight losses, morbidity and mortality [32]. Coccidial infections causes damage to the intestinal lining, making the gut susceptible to other infections including Clostridium perferinges [33,34].

The high incidence of poultry diseases reported to the Veterinary clinics was high during the dry period. This ranges between the months of October to April. This is similar to a report on the seasonal occurrence of poultry disease in Sokoto, Nigeria [20]. Most diseases occur all year round in most poultry populations, but are more common and severe at times of climatic stress.

Newcastle disease was highly prevalent in the dry season in the study area. This is in agreement with a study by Sonaiya [35], who reported ND to be more common during cold windy harmattan season.

Conclusions

The high prevalence of poultry diseases reported at the study area may be attributed to the fact that few poultry farmers vaccinate their birds against most of the poultry diseases. This finding agrees with the results of similar studies in Northeastern Nigeria in which difficulties associated with vaccination of chickens led to higher prevalence of infectious diseases [36]. Also, usage of disinfectants and sanitizers could have helped in controlling some of the diseases that were reported.

Recommendations

An in depth studies on the epidemiology of these diseases should be carried out and also exposure to disease organisms should be reduced by ensuring proper biosecurity measures and stress management. Disease outbreaks should be treated with specific medications that are effective against the diseases.

References

  1. Obi TU, Olubukola A, Maina GA (2008) Pro-Poor HPAI Risk Reduction Strategies in Nigeria- Background Paper Africa/Indonesia Region Report No. 5.
  2. Eduvie LO (2002) Poultry production in Nigeria. National Animal Production Research Institute. Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Water Resources, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.
  3. Abdu PA, Mera UM, Sa'idu L (1992) A study of chicken mortality in Zaria, Nigeria. World's Poultry Congress, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  4. Adene DF (1996) International poultry health problems: Perspective from the poultry industry in Africa. In Proceedings, 20th World Poultry Congress, New Delhi, India 2: 401-414.
  5. Ambali AG, Abubakar MB, James TE (2003) An Assessment of poultry health problems in Maiduguri, Borno State Nigeria. Tropical Veterinarian 21: 138-145.
  6. Udo RK (1981) Geographical Region of Nigeria. In: Heinemann Education Books, Ltd Ibadan, Nigeria.
  7. AbduPA,Sa'iduL,GeorgeBDI(2002)Diseases of local poultry in Nigeria. Discovery &Innovations 14: 1-2.
  8. Ameji ON, Abdu PA, Sa’idu L, Kabir J, Assam A (2012) Awareness, Knowledge, Readiness to Report Outbreak and Biosecurity Practice Towards Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza in Kogi State, Nigeria. Int J Poultry Sci 11: 11-15.
  9. Assam A, Abdu PA, Tabe-Ntui LN (2012) Local Poultry Farmers’ Media Use, Access and Understanding of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Communication Materials in Nigeria. Bull AnimHlth Prod Afr 60: 93-102.
  10. Wakawa AM, Mohammed ZK, Aliyu HB, Mohammed B (2012) A retrospective analysis of marek’s diseases diagnosed at poultry clinic of Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria. Journal of veterinary advances 2: 424-429.
  11. Zeleke A, Sori T, Gelaye E, Ayelet G (2005) Newcastle disease in village chickens in Southern and Rift valley Districts in Ethiopia. Int J Poultry Sci 4: 507-510.
  12. Sa’idu L, Abdu PA (2008) Outbreak of Viscerotropicvelogenic form of Newcastle disease in vaccinated six weeks old pullets. Sokoto Journal Vet Science 7: 37-40.
  13. Ananth R, Kirubaharam JJ, Priyadarshini MLM, Albert A (2008) Isolation of Newcastle disease viruses of high virulence in unvaccinated healthy village chickens in South India. International Journal of Poultry Science 7: 368-373.
  14. El-Yuguda AD, Baba SS (2002) Prevalence of selected viral infections in various age groups of village chicken in Borno state, Nigeria. Nigeria Journal Animal Production 29:245-250.
  15. Alexander DJ (2003) Newcastle disease and other avian paramyxoviruses infections. In: Saif YM, Barnes HJ, Glisson JR, Fadly AM, McDougald LR, et al. (Eds). Diseases of Poultry. (11thedn). IOWA State University Press Ames 1A, USA.
  16. Kapczynski DR, King DJ (2005) Protection of chickens against overt clinical disease and determination of viral shedding following vaccination with commercially available Newcastle disease virus vaccines upon challenge with highly virulent virus from the California 2002 exotic Newcastle disease outbreak. Vaccine 23: 3424-3433.
  17. Van Boven M, Bouma A, Teun HFF, Elly K, Leo H, et al. (2008) Herd immunity to Newcastle disease virus in Poultry by vaccination. Avian Pathology 37: 1-5.
  18. Numan M, Zahoor MA, Khan HA, Siddique M (2005) Serologic status of Newcastle disease in broilers and layers in Faisalabad and surrounding districts. Pakistan Vet J 25: 55-58.
  19. Sa’idu L, Abdu PA, Tekdek LB, Umoh JU (2000) Retrospective Study of Newcastle Disease Cases in Zaria, Nigeria. Nigeria Veterinary Journal 27:53-62.
  20. AdamuAY, Ahmed AB, Abubakar MB, Lawal MD (2009) A retrospective study (2004-2008) of poultry diseases diagnosed in veterinary teaching hospital (VTH), UsmanDanfodiyo University Sokoto (UDUS) and Sokoto Veterinary Centre (SVC), Sokoto state, Nigeria. International Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 1: 15-17.
  21. Berg van den TP, Esterradossi N, Toquin D, Meulemans G (2000) Infectious bursal disease (Gumboro disease). Rev Sci Tech OffIntEpiz 19: 527-543.
  22. Afonso CL, Tulman ER, Lu Z, Kutish GF, Rock DL (2000) The genome of fowl pox virus. J Virol 74: 3815-3831.
  23. Fallavena LC, Canal CW, Salle CT, Moraes HL, Rocha SL, et al. (2002) Presence of avipoxvirus DNA in avian dermal squamous cell carcinoma. Avian pathol 31: 241-246.
  24. Wigley P, Berchieri A, Page KL, Smith AL, Barrow PA (2001) Salmonella enteric serovarpullorum persist in splenic macrophages and in the reproductive tract during persistent, disease free carriage in chickens. Infect Immune 69: 7873-7879.
  25. Berchieri A, Murphy CK, Marston K, Barrow PA (2001) Observation on the persistence and vertical transmission of Salmonella enteric serovarPullorum and Gallinarum in chicken: Effect of bacterial and host genetic background. Avian Pathol 30:221-231.
  26. KabirLutful SM (2010) Aviancollibacillosis and Salmonellosis: A close look at epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, control and public health concerns. Int J Environ Res Public Health 7: 89-114.
  27. Van der Sluis W (2000b) “Necrotic enteritis” (3): Clostridial enteritis is an often underestimated problem. World Poulry 16: 42-43.
  28. Van der Sluis W (2000a) “Necrotic enteritis” (1): Clostridial enteritis a syndrome emerging worldwide. World Poultry 16: 56-57.
  29. Bukar-Kolo YM, Ibrahim UI, Abubakar BU (2006) A survey of major constraints limiting commercial poultry production in and around Gombe metropolis. Nigerian Veterinary Journal 27: 75-78.
  30. Badran I, Lukesova D (2006) Control of coccidiosis and different coccidian of chicken in selected technologies used in tropics and subtropics. AgriculturaTropicaEtSubtropica 39: 39-44.
  31. Ngaji LW, Nyaga PN, Mbuthia PG, Bebora LC, Michieka JN, et al. (2010) Prevalence of Newcastle disease virus in village indigenous chickens in varied agroecological zones of Kenya. Livestock Research for Rural Development18: 1-4.
  32. McDougald LR (2003) Coccidiosis In: Diseases of Poultry (11thedn), Iowa State Press, Iowa, USA.
  33. Kaldhusdal M, Lovland A (2000) The economic impact of Clostridium perfringes is greater than anticipated. World Poultry 16: 50-51.
  34. Sonaiya EB (2009) Fifteen years of family poultry research and development at ObafemiAwolowo University, Nigeria. In: Alders RG, Spradbrow PB, Young MP (Eds). Village chickens, poverty alleviation and the sustainable control of Newcastle disease. ACIAR Proceeding No. 131.
  35. Ibrahim UI, Tanya SN (2001) Prevalence of antibodies to infectious bursal disease (IBD) in village chickens in Sahel zone of Nigeria. Bulletin of Animal Health Production in Africa 49: 150-152.
Citation: Balami AG, Ndahi JJ, Zaifada AU, Mustapha M, Jarafu DJ, et al. (2014) A Retrospective Study of Poultry Diseases Diagnosed in Maiduguri, North-East, Nigeria. Poult Fish Wildl Sci 2: 113.

Copyright: © 2014 Balami AG, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top