Journal of Plant Biochemistry & Physiology
Open Access

Abiotic Stress: Mechanisms and Impact on Plant Growth

Kespeare Jeins^{* *}Correspondence: Kespeare Jeins, Department of Agricultural Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States of America, Email:

Author info »

Description

Abiotic stress refers to environmental factors such as drought, salinity, temperature extremes and nutrient imbalances that adversely affect plant growth and productivity. These stresses have a significant impact on agricultural systems, leading to reduced crop yields and posing a challenge to food security [1]. Understanding the mechanisms by which plants respond to abiotic stress is crucial for developing stress-tolerant crops that can withstand these adverse conditions. This communication highlights the key biochemical and physiological processes involved in plant responses to abiotic stress and their impact on growth [2].

Mechanisms of abiotic stress response

Plants have evolved intricate mechanisms to sense and respond to abiotic stresses. These responses can be categorized into both short-term and long-term strategies:

Cellular signaling and hormonal regulation: Upon exposure to stress, plants activate signaling pathways that lead to the production of stress-related hormones such as Abscisic Acid (ABA), ethylene and Jasmonic Acid (JA). These hormones modulate the expression of stress-related genes, promoting adaptations such as stomatal closure to prevent water loss during drought or the accumulation of osmotic regulators like proline to maintain cellular integrity under salinity stress [3,4].

Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) production and antioxidant defense: Abiotic stress often induces the generation of ROS, which can cause oxidative damage to cellular components. To mitigate this, plants activate antioxidant systems, including enzymes like Superoxide Dismutase (SOD), Catalase (CAT) and Peroxidase (POD), which neutralize ROS and protect cells from oxidative stress-induced damage [5].

Osmotic adjustment and ion homeostasis: Under drought and salinity stress, plants undergo osmotic adjustment by accumulating solutes such as proline, glycine betaine and sugars. These compounds help to stabilize proteins and membranes, maintaining cellular turgor. Furthermore, plants regulate ion uptake and compartmentalization through ion transporters, limiting the harmful effects of excessive Na⁺ or other toxic ions under saline conditions [6,7].

Gene expression and protein synthesis: Stress-responsive genes are upregulated under abiotic stress, leading to the synthesis of protective proteins such as Heat Shock Proteins (HSPs), Late Embryogenesis Abundant (LEA) proteins and dehydrins. These proteins play critical roles in stabilizing proteins, membranes, and enzymes, thereby enhancing cellular tolerance to stress.

Impact on plant growth

Abiotic stress severely impacts plant growth at various levels, from the cellular to the organismal. The following are the major growth-related effects:

Reduced photosynthesis: Stress-induced stomatal closure limits CO₂ uptake, reducing photosynthetic efficiency. Additionally, ROS accumulation can damage photosynthetic machinery, leading to a decline in chlorophyll content and further reducing photosynthesis.

Impaired cell division and elongation: Under stress, the cell cycle is often arrested, leading to stunted root and shoot growth. Stress also reduces cell wall extensibility and inhibits cell elongation, limiting overall plant growth [8,9].

Altered water relations: Drought and salinity stress lead to water deficit conditions, resulting in decreased water potential and turgor pressure. This negatively affects cellular processes such as nutrient transport, enzyme activity and protein synthesis.

Reproductive failure: Prolonged exposure to abiotic stress can also affect plant reproduction by causing flower abortion, reduced seed set and impaired seed germination, ultimately leading to decreased crop yield [10].

Conclusion

Abiotic stress represents a major threat to global agriculture and food security. Plants have evolved complex biochemical and physiological mechanisms to cope with these stresses; however, the magnitude of these stresses often overwhelms plant tolerance, leading to significant growth reductions. Understanding these mechanisms at a molecular level provides critical insights into developing stress-resistant crops. Further research into plant stress biology, especially through genetic manipulation and breeding, holds great potential for improving crop resilience in the face of changing environmental conditions.

References

1. Alcázar R, Planas J, Saxena T, Zarza X, Bortolotti C, Cuevas J, et al. Putrescine accumulation confers drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis plants over-expressing the homologous Arginine decarboxylase 2 gene. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2010;48(7):547-552.

   [Crossref][Google Scholar][PubMed]

2. Alcázar R, Marco F, Cuevas JC, Patron M, Ferrando A, Carrasco P, et al. Involvement of polyamines in plant response to abiotic stress. Biotechnol Lett. 2006;28:1867-1876.

   [Crossref][Google Scholar][PubMed]

3. Apel K, Hirt H. Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2004;55(1):373-399.

   [Crossref][Google Scholar][PubMed]

4. Clark G, Garcia CA, Butterfield T, Dauwalder M, Roux SJ. Secretion as a key component of gravitropic growth: implications for annexin involvement in differential growth. Gravit Space Biol Bull. 2005;18(2):113-115.

   [Google Scholar][PubMed]

5. Davies JM. Annexin-mediated calcium signalling in plants. Plants (Basel). 2014;3(1):128-140.

   [Crossref][Google Scholar][PubMed]

6. Popova OV, Dinh HQ, Aufsatz W, Jonak C. The RdDM pathway is required for basal heat tolerance in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant. 2013;6(2):396-410.

   [Crossref][Google Scholar][PubMed]

7. Ohama N, Sato H, Shinozaki K, Shinozaki YK. Transcriptional regulatory network of plant heat stress response. Trends in plant science. 2017;22(1):53-65.

   [Crossref][Google Scholar][PubMed]

8. Rajkumar M, Prasad MN, Swaminathan S, Freitas H. Climate change driven plant–metal–microbe interactions. Environ Int. 2013;53:74-86.

   [Crossref][Google Scholar][PubMed]

9. Jin LG, Liu JY. Molecular cloning, expression profile and promoter analysis of a novel ethylene responsive transcription factor gene GhERF4 from cotton (Gossypium hirstum). Plant Physiol Biochem. 2008;46(1):46-53.

   [Crossref][Google Scholar][PubMed]

10. Murata N, Takahashi S, Nishiyama Y, Allakhverdiev SI. Photoinhibition of photosystem II under environmental stress. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1767(6):414-421.

    [Crossref][Google Scholar][PubMed]