Organic Chemistry: Current Research
Open Access

Abstraction of Hydrogen Atom from Hydroxyl Radicals

Ewelina Bocian^{* *}Correspondence: Ewelina Bocian, Department of Bioorganic Compounds, University of the Andes, Carrera, Bogotá, Colombia, Email:

Author info »

Description

Hydro fluorocarbons (HFCs) are among the main environmentally adequate alternatives in contrast to ozonedestroying Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). The determination of the climatic days of HFCs is a key in surveying their ecological effect. They initially degrade in the lower atmosphere (troposphere) through hydrogen molecule deliberation by relatively abundant hydroxyl radicals. Relatively fluorinated ethers have been proposed as second-generation HFC substitutions as a result of their low ozone exhaustion possibilities and their thought more limited atmospheric lifetimes when compared with closely resembling HFCs, which subsequently diminishes the global warming potential. In an investigation of more than 150 fluorinated ethers, Francisco [1] verified that in the Ethyl Methyl Ether (EME) series, CF₃CF₂OCH₃ and CF₃CHFOCF₃ show as substitution refrigerants. Degradation in the lower atmosphere is started by a reaction with hydroxyl radicals (OH) to produce water and ether radicals.

Francisco [1] involved a general rate method for the reactions OH of radicals with CF₃OCH₃, CF₂HOCF₂H, and CF₃OCF₂H. They found slow reaction rates for the last two, which means fundamentally longer atmospheric lifetimes than recently estimated. They determined C-H bond qualities. A similar group completed hypothetical work on smaller ethers, yet their computations for reactions with OH have been restricted to halogenated formates. A hypothetical report by Leroux [2], likewise on CF₃OCH₃, CF₂HOCF₂H, and CF₃OCF₂H, yielded C-H bond separation energies and heat of formation.

In our past work on unimolecular deteriorations of these ethers, the B3LYP was utilized. But, Sekiya et al. found that even after a broad inquiry the B3LYP utilitarian couldn't track down a stationary point for the TS of the hydrogen abstraction response of OH with dimethyl ether [3]. It is also found that most DFT techniques will generally underestimate obstruction levels for H abstraction reaction. Oyaro et al. propose that the justification for DFT's poor performance in these cases is the purported selfinteraction error that emerges when one uses a local functional for exchange, and the issue can be somewhat fixed by working on the treatment of exchange [4]. However, B3LYP uses 25% of exact exchange, while a few modern hybrids address the obstruction level issue by utilizing a lot bigger part of exact exchange.

Hydrogen bonding plays a key part in the barrier levels and the patterns they follow. Hydrogen bonding for this analysis was determined to be any interatomic distance among F and O or H and O under 2.5 Å. Two patterns that are obvious right away are the number of hydrogen bonds to F and the number of hydrogen bonds to oxygen there concerning the quantity of F in the particle. In molecules with low quantities of F, hydrogen bonding to oxygen is predominant. For instance, for particles with one F, its place can be at the end, inaccessible to hydrogen bond with the approaching OH radicles. In atoms with large quantities of F, hydrogen bonding with F is predominant [5]. At the point when the hydrogen being abstracted comes from the center of the particle, this also represents the smaller barrier heights in the TS with a similar reactant atom. This shows that the hydrogen attached to the center carbon are the easiest to abstract and this might be because of the hydrogen bonding to oxygen. If we look at plots of hydrogen bonding to oxygen and F versus the quantity of F we see that as the percent of hydrogen bonds to oxygen increases then the barrier height declines and as the percent hydrogen bonding to F increments barrier height increments.

Hydrogen bonding to F gives the most minimal barrier heights and is reliably below the average barrier height. Hydrogen attaching to oxygen gives lower barrier heights than the normal for EME with two F or less yet gives higher barrier heights than normal for ethyl methyl ether with multiple F. Assuming the ethyl methyl ether has no hydrogen bonding, EME that has three or less F, the barrier heights are higher than the normal.

References

1. Francisco JS, Maricq MM. Making sure that hydrofluorocarbons are ‘ozone friendly’. Acc Chem Res. 1996;29(8): 391-397.

   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

2. Leroux F, Jeschke P, Schlosser M. α-Fluorinated ethers, thioethers, and amines: anomerically biased species. Chem Rev. 2005; 105(3):827-856.

   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

3. Sekiya A, Misaki S. The potential of hydrofluoroethers to replace CFCs, HCFCs and PFCs. J Fluor Chem. 2000;101(2): 215-221.

   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

4. Oyaro N, Sellevåg SR, Nielsen CJ. Atmospheric chemistry of hydrofluoroethers: reaction of a series of hydrofluoroethers with OH radicals and Cl atoms, atmospheric lifetimes, and global warming potentials. J Phys Chem A. 2005;109(2): 337-346.

   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

5. Chen L, Kutsuna S, Tokuhashi K, Sekiya A, Tamai R, Hibino Y. Kinetics and mechanism of (CF3)2CHOCH3 reaction with OH radicals in an environmental reaction chamber. J Phys Chem A. 2005;105(21): 4766-4771.

   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]