Journal of Hematology & Thromboembolic Diseases
Open Access

Adapting Blood Donation Practices in the Era of COVID-19: Challenges and Innovations

Steffens Handelsman^{* *}Correspondence: Steffens Handelsman, Department of Hematology, University of Buraimi, Buraimi, Oman, Email:

Author info »

Description

The COVID-19 pandemic has swept across the globe, leaving no aspect of life untouched [1]. Among the many sectors profoundly affected is the realm of blood donation. As nations grapple with the challenges posed by the pandemic, blood donation practices have undergone significant transformations [2]. In this article, we delve into the multifaceted impact of COVID-19 on blood donation, exploring both the challenges encountered and the innovative solutions that have emerged in response.

Challenges faced by blood donation practices

Decreased donor turnout: One of the most immediate impacts of COVID-19 has been a decline in blood donor turnout [3]. With social distancing measures, lockdowns, and fear of infection, many regular donors have been reluctant or unable to donate, leading to shortages in blood supply.

Cancellation of blood drives: Blood drives, a primary source of blood donations, have been canceled or scaled back due to restrictions on public gatherings. Schools, workplaces, and community centers, which traditionally host blood drives, have been unavailable or deemed unsafe venues during the pandemic [4-6].

Staffing and operational challenges: Blood donation centers have faced staffing shortages and operational disruptions due to illness among staff, increased safety protocols, and logistical hurdles [7]. Ensuring the safety of donors and staff while maintaining efficient donation processes has posed significant challenges.

Transportation and distribution issues: Movement restrictions and disruptions in transportation networks have hindered the timely distribution of blood products to hospitals and healthcare facilities. This has exacerbated the strain on healthcare systems already grappling with the demands of the pandemic [8-12].

Innovations and solutions

Adoption of appointment-based systems: To manage donor flow and adhere to social distancing guidelines, many blood donation centers have implemented appointment-based systems. Donors are encouraged to schedule appointments in advance [13], allowing centers to regulate the number of donors present at any given time and minimize wait times.

Mobile blood drives and pop-up centers: Recognizing the limitations of traditional blood drive venues, organizations have embraced mobile blood drives and pop-up donation centers. By bringing donation opportunities directly to communities, these initiatives have helped offset the decline in donations resulting from canceled drives [14].

Emphasis on safety protocols: Blood donation centers have prioritized stringent safety protocols to reassure donors of the safety of the donation process. Measures such as temperature checks, health screenings, enhanced sanitation practices, and the use of personal protective equipment have become standard procedures.

Community engagement and awareness campaigns: Efforts to raise awareness about the ongoing need for blood donations have been intensified through community engagement and targeted campaigns [15,16]. Highlighting the critical role of blood donors in saving lives, these initiatives aim to inspire individuals to overcome hesitations and contribute to the cause.

Utilization of technology: Technology has played a crucial role in adapting blood donation practices to the challenges of the pandemic. Online platforms for appointment scheduling, virtual donor education sessions, and digital outreach campaigns have facilitated donor engagement and streamlined donation processes [17-19].

The ongoing importance of blood donation: Despite the disruptions caused by COVID-19, the need for blood donations remains constant. Blood transfusions are essential for treating various medical conditions, including trauma, surgeries, cancer treatments, and chronic illnesses. As healthcare systems continue to respond to the pandemic, maintaining an adequate and safe blood supply is paramount.

Looking ahead: As the world navigates the ongoing challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, the resilience and adaptability of blood donation practices offer a beacon of hope. While uncertainties persist, the collective efforts of donors, healthcare professionals, and organizations dedicated to blood donation continue to drive progress. By embracing innovation, prioritizing safety, and fostering community engagement, we can ensure that the lifeline of blood donation remains strong in the face of adversity [20].

Conclusion

The impact of COVID-19 on blood donation practices has been profound, presenting unprecedented challenges while inspiring innovative solutions. As we continue to confront the realities of the pandemic, the importance of blood donation in saving lives has never been clearer. By adapting to evolving circumstances and leveraging the power of collective action, we can overcome obstacles and sustain the critical lifeline of blood donation for generations to come.

References

1. Luepker RV, Apple FS, Christenson RH, Crow RS, Fortmann SP, Goff D, et al. Case definitions for acute coronary heart disease in epidemiology and clinical research studies: A statement from the AHA Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; AHA Statistics Committee; World Heart Federation Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Epidemiology and Prevention; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Circulation. 2003;108(20):2543-2549.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

2. Ivey SL, Hanley HR, Taylor C, Stock E, Vora N, Woo J, et al. Right Care Women's Cardiovascular Writing Group. Early identification and treatment of women's cardiovascular risk factors prevents cardiovascular disease, saves lives, and protects future generations: Policy recommendations and take action plan utilizing policy levers. Clin Cardiol. 2022;45(11):1100-1106.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

3. Alizadehsani R, Khosravi A, Roshanzamir M, Abdar M, Sarrafzadegan N, Shafie D, et al. Coronary artery disease detection using artificial intelligence techniques: A survey of trends, geographical differences and diagnostic features 1991-2020. Comput Biol Med. 2021;128:104095.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

4. Rautaharju PM, Surawicz B, Gettes LS. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: Part IV: The ST segment, T and U waves, and the QT interval: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society: Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. Circulation. 2009;119(10):241-250.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

5. Nable JV, Brady W. The evolution of electrocardiographic changes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Emerg Med. 2009;27(6):734-746.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

6. Itchhaporia D, Snow PB, Almassy RJ, Oetgen WJ. Artificial neural networks: Current status in cardiovascular medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28(2):515-521.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

7. Hong S, Zhou Y, Shang J, Xiao C, Sun J. Opportunities and challenges of deep learning methods for electrocardiogram data: A systematic review. Comput Biol Med. 2020;122:103801.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

8. Somani S, Russak AJ, Richter F, Zhao S, Vaid A, Chaudhry F, et al. Deep learning and the electrocardiogram: Review of the current state-of-the-art. EP Europace. 2021;23(8):1179-1191.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

9. Mincholé A, Camps J, Lyon A, Rodríguez B. Machine learning in the electrocardiogram. J Electrocardiol. 2019;57:S61-64.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

10. Hong S, Zhou Y, Shang J, Xiao C, Sun J. Opportunities and challenges of deep learning methods for electrocardiogram data: A systematic review. Comput Biol Med. 2020;122:103801.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

11. Abubaker MB, Babayiğit B. Detection of cardiovascular diseases in ECG images using machine learning and deep learning methods. IEEE Trans Artif Intell. 2022;4(2):373-382.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

12. Subramani S, Varshney N, Anand MV, Soudagar ME, Al-Keridis LA, Upadhyay TK, et al. Cardiovascular diseases prediction by machine learning incorporation with deep learning. Front Med. 2023;10:1150933.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

13. Golande AL, Pavankumar T. Optical electrocardiogram based heart disease prediction using hybrid deep learning. J Big Data. 2023;10(1):139.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

14. Yoon T, Kang D. Bimodal CNN for cardiovascular disease classification by co-training ECG grayscale images and scalograms. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):2937.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

15. Taylan O, Alkabaa AS, Alqabbaa HS, Pamukçu E, Leiva V. Early prediction in classification of cardiovascular diseases with machine learning, neuro-fuzzy and statistical methods. Biology. 2023;12(1):117.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

16. Khan F, Yu X, Yuan Z, Rehman AU. ECG classification using 1-D convolutional deep residual neural network. Plos One. 2023;18(4):e0284791.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

17. Song G, Zhang J, Mao D, Chen G, Pang C. A multimodel fusion method for cardiovascular disease detection using ECG. Emerg Med Int. 2022;2022.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

18. Shankar MG, Babu CG, Rajaguru H. Classification of cardiac diseases from ECG signals through bio inspired classifiers with Adam and R-Adam approaches for hyperparameters updation. Measurement. 2022;194:111048.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

19. Kumar S, Mallik A, Kumar A, Ser DJ, Yang G. Fuzz-Clust Net: Coupled fuzzy clustering and deep neural networks for Arrhythmia detection from ECG signals. Comput Biol Med. 2023;153:106511.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

20. Wagner P, Strodthoff N, Bousseljot RD, Kreiseler D, Lunze FI, Samek W, et al. PTB-XL, a large publicly available electrocardiography dataset. Sci Data. 2020;7(1):154.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]