ISSN: 2329-8790
+44 1478 350008
Short Communication - (2023)Volume 11, Issue 11
Recent insights into the connection between erythropoietin, iron, and erythropoiesis in individuals with blood loss anemia, whether or not they undergo recombinant human erythropoietin therapy, carry significant implications for patient care. In instances of substantial blood loss, or when erythropoietin therapy is employed, or both, there is observable evidence of iron-restricted erythropoiesis, even in the presence of stored iron and oral iron supplementation [1]. Renal dialysis patients receiving erythropoietin therapy and intravenous iron treatment exhibit hematologic responses, with serum ferritin levels reaching upto 400 μg/L. This underscores the inadequacy of traditional biochemical markers for assessing storage iron in anemic patients with chronic diseases. Modern measurements utilizing automated counters to evaluate reticulocyte indices have the potential to detect erythropoiesis restricted by iron.
While assays for serum erythropoietin and the transferrin receptor prove valuable in clinical research, their roles in routine clinical practice remain undefined. The emergence of safer intravenous iron preparations enables controlled studies to assess their efficacy in patient’s and various clinical scenarios have functioned as "natural experiments," advancing our comprehension of the interplay among erythropoietin, iron, and the erythropoietic response to anemia in humans. Approximately two decades ago, Finch provided a comprehensive overview, primarily drawing insights from studies involving healthy individuals, those with hereditary hemolytic anemias, and patients with hemochromatosis. Under conditions of basal erythropoiesis in normal subjects, plasma iron turnover, indicative of marrow erythropoietic response, remains relatively unaffected, irrespective of transferrin saturation levels [2]. Conversely, individuals with congenital hemolytic anemia, experiencing chronically elevated erythropoiesis, exhibit a response influenced and constrained by serum iron levels and transferrin saturation. Hemochromatosis patients, subjected to serial phlebotomies, mount significant erythropoietic responses attributed to sustained high serum iron and transferrin saturation levels.
Autologous phlebotomy-induced blood loss anemia
Patients undergoing autologous blood phlebotomy may donate approximately 10.5 mL/kg (450 ± 45 mL) blood as frequently as twice a week until 72 hours before surgery, with routine donations occurring once a week. Oral iron supplements are typically prescribed. This iatrogenic blood loss prompts an increase in endogenous erythropoietin levels, significantly elevated over basal levels but within the normal range (4-26 μm/ mL). The resulting erythropoietic response is modest, with estimated red blood cell volume expansion surpassing basal rates, highlighting the efficacy of this blood conservation practice. More aggressive phlebotomy, up to 2 units weekly, elicits a more substantial endogenous erythropoietin response [3]. The relationship between change in hemoglobin levels and erythropoietin response aligns with predictions from phlebotomy experiments in normal subjects.
Erythropoiesis facilitated by erythropoietin therapy
Clinical trials demonstrate a dose-response relationship between erythropoietin and red blood cell expansion. Even "very low" dose erythropoietin therapy in autologous blood donors results in clinically significant erythropoiesis. The response varies widely but is not influenced by patient gender or age suggesting other factors like chronic disease or iron-restricted erythropoiesis contributes to this variability. Studies in patients with anemia of chronic disease further underscore the comparable erythropoietic responses between endogenous erythropoietinmediated erythropoiesis and erythropoietin therapy.
Iron-restricted erythropoiesis and iron therapy
The response of erythropoiesis to aggressive autologous phlebotomy, driven by endogenous erythropoietin, exhibits a threefold increase. Intriguingly, basal iron stores do not correlate with this level of erythropoiesis, suggesting that storage iron sufficiently maintains serum iron and transferrin saturation for erythron requirements [4]. Oral iron supplementation demonstrates limited efficacy, while intravenous iron proves ineffective under these conditions. Even in patients with measurable storage iron during erythropoietin therapy, ironrestricted erythropoiesis becomes apparent, with a substantial increase in gastrointestinal iron absorption counteracted by a decrease of up to 50% in serum ferritin and transferrin saturation levels. Hematological changes, such as a fourfold surge in erythropoietic activity, declining reticulocyte counts, and the appearance of hypochromic red cells, underscore the impact of erythropoietin therapy. The study of hemochromatosis patients reinforces the notion of iron-restricted erythropoiesis in erythropoietin-treated individuals.
Factors influencing erythropoietic response
Basal red cell precursor mass acts as a constraining factor with half-maximal hemoglobin synthesis achievable with as few as 50 molecules of erythropoietin per target cell. The biological response is maximized at lower erythropoietin concentrations than needed to saturate all erythropoietin-binding sites. Optimal reticulocyte responses occur with a single erythropoietin dose of 1800 U/kg in healthy subjects, and multiple-dose regimens prove more effective in mobilizing storage iron than single-dose regimens. A 72-hour interval between erythropoietin administrations surpasses a 24-hour interval. Erythropoietin therapy triggers the gradual expansion of erythroblast mass, meeting acute and chronic demands for erythropoiesis [5].
Blood loss and iron therapy
In patients with blood loss anemia, iron-restricted erythropoiesis is clinically significant, irrespective of measurable storage iron. While oral iron suffices for endogenous erythropoietin-mediated red blood cell expansion, it may not prevent iron-restricted erythropoiesis during erythropoietin therapy. Intravenous iron enables a fivefold erythropoietic response to significant blood loss anemia in healthy individuals. However, challenges arise in achieving higher hemoglobin production rates unless red marrow expands into the yellow marrow space. Intravenous iron therapy in patients not undergoing erythropoietin therapy may result in iron sequestration in the reticuloendothelial system, limiting its availability for erythropoiesis
Anemia of chronic renal failure or chronic disease
Erythropoietin therapy's success in addressing anemia related to chronic renal failure provides insights into erythropoietin, iron metabolism, and erythropoiesis. Anemic dialysis patients may exhibit hyporesponsiveness to oral iron therapy due to factors like aluminum toxicity and iron deficiency [6]. Intravenous iron administration becomes a standard approach in these patients, with significant reductions in erythropoietin dosage. The efficacy of intravenous iron in patients with chronic disease underscores the complexity of iron-restricted erythropoiesis, requiring specialized treatment approaches [7,8]. These insights into iron- restricted erythropoiesis and its interplay with erythropoietin therapy pave the way for refined treatment strategies and further investigations to optimize patient outcomes.
Advancements in laboratory techniques for assessing ironrestricted erythropoiesis, coupled with clinical trials involving blood phlebotomy and erythropoietin therapy, have enhanced our comprehension of the intricate relationship among erythropoietin, iron, and erythropoiesis. Newly automated counters measuring hematologic indices and reticulocyte parameters exhibit promise in evaluating iron-restricted erythropoiesis, yet further investigations are imperative to ascertain their precise roles in conjunction with iron and erythropoietin therapy. While erythropoietin and transferrin receptor assays prove valuable in clinical research, their applications in routine clinical practice lack well-defined parameters.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Citation: Sarah F (2023) Advances in Iron-Restricted Erythropoiesis and Its Implications for Iron Therapy. J Hematol Thrombo Dis.11:574.
Received: 01-Nov-2023, Manuscript No. JHTD-23-28427; Editor assigned: 03-Nov-2023, Pre QC No. JHTD-23-28427 (PQ); Reviewed: 17-Nov-2023, QC No. JHTD-23-28427; Revised: 24-Nov-2023, Manuscript No. JHTD-23-28427 (R); Published: 01-Dec-2023 , DOI: 10.35248/2329-8790.23.11.574
Copyright: © 2023 Sarah F. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.