Journal of Tourism & Hospitality
Open Access

Agro Tourism: A Way for Livelihood Security of Farmers of Tumkur District of Karnataka

Vishwanath Hanumantharaya^1*, Savitha C Maheshaiah¹, Suresha Senapathi² and Manjuprakash Marella-G^{2 *}Correspondence: Vishwanath Hanumantharaya, Department of Agricultural Extension, College of Agriculture, Bangalore, India, Email:

Author info »

Introduction

Agro tourism is the concept of visiting an agricultural, horticultural, animal husbandry or agri-enterprise operations for the purpose of enjoyment, education, or active involvement in the activities of the farm or operation. In general, agro tourism is the practice of attracting visitors to an area used primarily for agricultural purposes. It could be described as Rural/Agricultural Environments+Farm Commodities+Tourism Services=Agro tourism. Agro tourism is basically a subset of rural tourism where tourism concept is invoked in the agriculture activities [1]. Agro tourism defined as “A range of activities, services and amenities provided by farmers and rural people to attract tourists to their area in order to generate extra income for their business” [2]. In general, agro tourism is defined as any form of tourism that showcases the rural life, art, culture and heritage at rural locations thereby benefitting the local community economically and socially and enabling interaction between the tourists and the locals for a more enriching tourism experience [3]. The concept of agro tourism developed due to urbanization, as many people are not aware of rural background and the constraints in production of grain, fruits, and vegetables. Agro tourism not only provides opportunity to the visitors to involve in the activities such as visit to farmer’s markets to purchase farm fresh products, taking part in orchard and floral garden tours, bullock cart rides, tractor rides, agricultural operations, Pottery making, using farm bed and breakfast, accommodation, wineries, aquaculture, petting farms, and participating in other such agricultural activities. It is also a source of income to the farmers in the Agro Tourism Centers (ATCs).

Today agriculture sector in India is facing acute problems like of infrastructure, warehousing, climate change, excessive rains, drought, no irrigation facilities, availability of inputs, finance and effective marketing etc. Agriculture in India is most uncertain depending on monsoon with fewer avenues from irrigation. Hence it is needed to supplement the income of rural folk and the Indian farmers should find an alternate means of livelihood. Since agriculture is the main occupation of the people in India there is a need to think of allied income generation strategies with agriculture, one of which is agro tourism [4]. Karnataka is one of the prominent agricultural producing states and it is one of the top ten domestic tourism destinations in India, Ranking IV among the states and there is a large scope and great potential to develop agro-tourism. Many ATCs already established in different parts of Karnataka [5]. These Agro tourism approach has got lot of potential to transform and develop a rural economy into a modern economy by utilizing the local resources to its fullest potential. It also has the capacity to generate a marginal income or supplementary source of income and also employment opportunities to the farmers. Hence it is a means and ways of livelihood security to the farmers in ATCs.

Materials and Methods

As there are no much study conducted on ATCs, keeping in view the importance of ATCs as a means of livelihood security to farmers a study on ATCs is of paramount importance. Hence the present study was planned with the objective of analyzing the impact of Agro Tourism on Livelihood Security of Farmers. The study was conducted to measure the impact of agro tourism on livelihood security of farmers of Ramangara district of Karnataka state. The district was selected purposively based on the number of agro tourism centers for pretest and the convenience of the researcher. From 8 different agro tourism centers of Tumkur, 4 farmers from each center comprising of total 32 farmers were randomly selected. The data was collected from the farmers by interview method using structured schedule, which consisted of livelihood security statements. Ex-post-facto research design was adopted for the study. The responses were scored, classified, analyzed and calculated the mean livelihood security score for each statements under different dimensions of livelihood security. The overall livelihood security was classified into low medium and high based on the mean and standard deviation calculated.

Results and Discussion

It is evident from the Figure 1, that majority (59.38 %) of the farmers belong to the medium category of overall livelihood security followed by 28.12 per cent of the farmers belong to the low and 12.50 per cent of the farmers belongs to the high category of livelihood security. This may be due to the fact that the participation of visitors in the agricultural activities is less; also the visitors are not available throughout the year in all the season. The income level of farmers is not up to the expectations [6]. There are no much interactions between the tourists and the farmers in agro tourism centers, farmers are not taking full advantage of having direct link with customers in agro tourism centers. Hence more than fifty per cent of the farmers belong to the medium category. These results of livelihood security are in confirmation with the findings of Narayani et al. (Table 1 and Figure 1).

Figure 1: Overall impact of agro tourism on livelihood security of farmers.

Table 1: Overall impact of agro tourism on livelihood security of farmers.

The results from the Table 2 indicate the social security factors influencing the livelihood security of farmers in ATCs. It was evident that the highest mean livelihood security score of 4.00 was observed for the statement “Agro-tourism benefits the local community socially by enabling interaction between the tourists and the locals for a more educational tourism experience”. Farmers felt that social security of local community enhanced through increased interaction between the tourists, through which local customs and traditions preserved and encouraged. With more interaction more intercultural communication takes place [7]. On the other side, it is observed that the mean livelihood security on statement, “The Agro-tourism prevents migration of rural youth to city” i.e., 2.71 was the least mean score. ATCs cannot prevent the rural youth migration to the cities, as they are more attracted towards city life. Even though ATCs creates employment opportunities to the youths, the income or the salary what they get is comparatively high in the cities (Table 2).

Table 2: Social security factors influencing the livelihood security of farmers in agro tourism.

We can observe from the Table 3 that among the statements of economic security “Agro-tourism help the farmers to gain more income by undertaking diversified activities and services” is having the highest mean score of 4.12 and “Irrespective of climate or season, the income from the farm is ensured” having lowest mean score of 3.03. Having diversified activities such as selling of farm products, availability of desi foods, rural sports, pottery making, and bullock cart riding etc., people were more attracted and participation was high, as a result it ensures good income to the farmers. On contrary the number of visitors will vary depending on the climate or seasons and it affects the income level during the off season (Table 3).

Table 3: Economic security factors influencing the livelihood security of farmers in agro tourism.

It is clearly depicted from Table 4 that the livelihood of farmers expressed under educational security factors, the highest mean livelihood security score of 3.71 for the statement “Agro-tourism supports increased awareness on agriculture.” It shows that farmers knowledge is increased with the involvement in the various agro tourism activities, on how to carryout agricultural activities in an innovative way by referring to the various literature which aids for betterment of farm and attracting the visitors [8]. Thus ensuring the educational security. We can observe from the table that the least mean livelihood security score of 2.91 is observed on the statement “Agro-tourism act as a tool to teach the interactive effects of environment and agriculture to the population, this may be due to reason that farmers are less likely to have knowledge on the interactive effects of environment with agriculture (Table 4).

Table 4: Educational security factors influencing the livelihood security of farmers in agro tourism.

It was witnessed from the Table 5 that among the statements from health security, the statement “Promotes better health conditions.” is having the highest mean score 3.78. Agro tourism represents more than just a stay at peasant guest house. The activities at the farm, good environment keeps the body healthy and mind calm. Health components cannot be disassociated from economic, social and cultural life of the people. Agro tourism provides all these to farmers by means of financial stability, interaction with visitors and satisfaction in their personal life too (Table 5).

Table 5: Health security factors influencing the livelihood security of farmers in agro tourism.

The results in the Table 6 show the Ecological and Environmental security factors influencing the livelihood security of farmers in ATCs. It was witnessed from the results that the statement “Improving aesthetic value of the nature by means of human intervention” has got the highest mean score 3.87. Aesthetic values are of prime importance for visitors, tourists fall in love with the place when the aesthetic experience is good. Farmers expressed that human intervention with innovative ideas can create more aesthetic value and if educational messages on environmental protection are given at the ATCs, the tourists are more likely to accept them. Contrary to this the results also indicate the lowest mean score of 2.37 for the statement “Agro-tourism cause air pollution and increase environmental temperature”. It may be due to the fact that agro tourism is the way for ecological stability and environmental conservation. Due to the presence of diversified components in the ATCs, utilization of natural resources and reuse mechanisms, the pollution is reduced and the greenery at the ATCs helps in balancing the environment (Table 6).

Table 6: Ecological and environmental security factors influencing the livelihood security of farmers in agro tourism.

Conclusion

India basically being a farming nation, agriculture is the essential thing in the Indian economy. Agro tourism which is an emerging concept in the tourism industry and contributes to the GDP of the country and it is a crucial tool for employment generation and sustainable human development. The present study is instrumental in understanding the importance of agro tourism on overall livelihood security of the farmers. The study revealed that the social, economic, educational, health and environmental security aspects contribute well to the overall livelihood security of farmers. Agro Tourism provides an alternative source of livelihood and large scale employment opportunities for farmers. In India, Agro tourism is still in nascent stage and if the idea is promoted and widely adopted, it not only enhances livelihood security of the farmers but it also serves as a value addition and can accelerate further economic growth of the country. Therefore, the concept of agro tourism should be effectively implemented in the developmental programs. Government and all stakeholders including the local communities and the relevant institutions in a country need to work together so that the utilization, development and management of tourist areas could be given serious attention.

References

1. Chadda D, Bhakare S. Socio-economic implications of agri tourism in India. Intern Conf Innov, Trade Economics.2012;30(3):151-155.

   [Google scholar]

2. Gannon A. Rural tourism as a factor in rural community economic development for economies in transition. J Sustain Tour. 1994;2(1-2):51-60.

   [Cross Ref] [Google scholar]

3. Hamsa KR, Rohith GV, Rashmi KS, Srikanthamurthy PS, Chandrakanth MG. Recreational use value of tourism using metadata. Mysore J Agricult Sci. 2015;49(3):548-552.

   [Google scholar]

4. Karthik D, Gajanand P. Agri-tourism: An overview. Biotech Articles. 2019.

   [Google scholar]

5. Krishna D. Karijgi, Impact and Prospects of Agritourism in India: A multidimensional study. Indian Agri Res Inst. 2019.
6. Narayani SL, Anand TN, Gowda KN, Shivamurthy M. Study on livelihood security of farmers in Virudhunagar district of Tamil Nadu. Mysore J Agricult Sci. 2011;45(1):111-116.

   [Google scholar]

7. Taware Pandurang. Agri Tourism: New Revenue Stream for Farmers thru Rural-Urban Reunion. Finan Agri. 2010;42[5]:20-21.

   [Google scholar]

8. Taware Pandurang. Agri-tourism: Innovative supplementary income generating activity for enterprising farmers. Confederation of Indian Industry (CII).2011.