Journal of Perioperative Medicine
Open Access

Anesthesiology Burnout's Factors and Incidence

Barba Orlando^{* *}Correspondence: Barba Orlando, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, USA, Email:

Author info »

Description

Several medical fields have been identified as having a significant risk of psychological stress. On one hand, stress can have beneficial consequences when used in combination with a proper psychological approach and appropriate header methods. Indeed, physician’s ability to tackle difficult things might increase authority and enhance the sense of well-being and of being useful [1]. On the other hand, associate degree exaggerated that degree of stress might result in decreased satisfaction, undermining physician’s mental and physical health and at last resulting in a psychological syndrome called burnout. This syndrome is reaching epidemic levels within the medical population with prevalence rumored around. Burnout occurs as a result of chronic emotional, physical, and mental stress. It is most likely caused by the lack of proper support from helping organizations and management. It has a negative impact on patient care and medical expertise.

High Emotional Exhaustion (EE), high Depersonalization (DP), and low Personal Accomplishment (PA) are widely considered as the three key components of burnout syndrome [2]. In brief, technology can cause a subjective sense of exhaustion at work. DP may be a defense to separate oneself from work, and low PA represents a sense of frustration with work-related achievements. Burnout syndrome differs from depression as a result of the work atmosphere. The presence of burnout has been related to the connection impairment between team members, all at once with a slashed work activity and a worsened quality of care delivered, presumably increasing attention prices [3]. It’s been hypothesized that this will produce a vicious circle, fostering a lot of trenchant cost-containment policies that successively might increase stress perception of the healthcare members. Burnout can also contribute to the development of serious depression or substance abuse. With this background, it's simple to know why physician’s burnout might seriously have an effect on healthcare performances and well-being, with a control on the amount of patient’s care. Therefore, it's not so surprising that strategies for reducing its impact are generating a lot of interest and criticism.

Anesthesiology is one of the most offensive medical fields, subjecting physicians to enormous responsibilities and unpleasant tasks such as the management of life-threatening situations on a daily basis [4]. Moreover, as the duties include nightlong shifts in weekends and festivals as well, the work pattern is seemed to be more unpleasant than in other medical disciplines. Though it might not be exquisite to seek out a high incidence of burnout among professionals operating as anesthesiologists, a scientific assessment has not been conducted up to now [5]. Therefore, we have a tendency to conduct a scientific search aiming at exploring the incidence of burnout in medical specialty and presumably describing its characteristics consistent with operating place, career state and progression, and personal characteristics (i.e., family support), so as to produce a general perspective of burnout in physiological state practitioners.

The prevalence of burnout syndrome among anesthesiologists is comparatively high, and it looks higher in younger physicians with lower expertise. Other statistically identified risk factors for anesthesiologists' burnout include activity conditions (mainly job overload and being a young consultant) and personal situations (having children). However, few studies have enclosed that still some additional analysis is needed in this field due to large differences in their methodology and coverage approach.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

Author has decline to have conflict of interest

References

1. De Oliveira Jr GS, Chang R, Fitzgerald PC, Almeida MD, Castro-Alves LS, Ahmad S, et al. The prevalence of burnout and depression and their association with adherence to safety and practice standards: A survey of United States anesthesiology trainees. Anesth Analg. 2013;117(1):182-193.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Pubmed]

2. Eslava-Schmalbach J, Garzón-Orjuela N, Martínez NT, Gonzalez-Gordon L, Rosero E, Gómez-Restrepo C. Prevalence and factors associated with burnout syndrome in Colombian anesthesiologists. Int J Prev Med. 2020;11(1):5.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Pubmed]

3. Sanfilippo F, Noto A, Palumbo GJ, Ippolito M, Gagliardone M, Scarlata M, Bignami E, et al. Burnout in cardiac anesthesiologists: results from a national survey in Italy. J Cardiothorac Vasc. Anesth. 2018;32(6):2459-2466.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Pubmed]

4. Li H, Zuo M, Gelb AW, Zhang B, Zhao X, Yao D, Xia D, Huang Y. Chinese anesthesiologists have high burnout and low job satisfaction: A cross-sectional survey. Anesth Analg. 2018;126(3):1004-1012.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Pubmed]

5. Freire PL, Trentin JP, de Avila Quevedo L. Trends in burnout syndrome and emotional factors: an assessment of anesthesiologists in Southern Brazil, 2012. Psychol Health Med. 2016;21(4):413-423.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Pubmed]