Journal of Nutrition & Food Sciences

Journal of Nutrition & Food Sciences
Open Access

ISSN: 2155-9600

+32 25889658

Research Article - (2015) Volume 5, Issue 5

Assessment of Adolescents Under Nutrition Level among School Students in Eastern Tigray, Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study

Weres ZG1, Yebyo HG2, Miruts KB3, Gesesew HA4,5* and Woldehymanot TE6
1Department of Public Health Nutrition, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia
2Department of Biostatics and epidemiology, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia
3Department of population and reproductive health, Debrebrhan University, Debrebrhan, Ethiopia
4Department of Epidemiology, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia
5Discipline of Public Health, Flinders University, South Australia, Australia
6Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia
*Corresponding Author: Gesesew HA, Department of Epidemiology, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia

Abstract

Background: Adolescence is the most important period of life where growth and development are accompanied, leading to increased demand for nutrients which could pose a greater risk of under nutrition. Little emphasis is given to reveal the evidence of level of under nutrition in this age group. So, this study assessed the magnitude of adolescents’ under nutrition and its associated factors among primary and secondary public school in Eastern Tigray, Ethiopia.
Methods: Cross-sectional study design was conducted in April 2013, Tigray, Ethiopia. A sample of 411 primary and secondary adolescent students was selected using two stage stratified cluster sampling technique. The 2007 growth reference was used to assess prevalence of under nutrition. Data were analyzed using SPSS 20 for windows and logistic regression was used to declare the independent predictors considering p-value <0.05 was used as a cutoff point.
Results: The prevalence of stunting, wasting and underweight were 25.5%, 44% and 55% respectively. Stunting, wasting and underweight were more prevalent among males and early adolescents. The most important predictors identified for wasting were early adolescents’ age (AOR=4.68, 95% CI=1.81-12.13), being male (AOR=5.31, 95% CI=1.73-16.32) and menarche (AOR=2.65, 95% CI=1.006-6.978). Adolescent girls who did not experience menarche were 5.5 times more likely to be under weight than those who had experienced menarche (AOR=5.47, 95% CI=2.91- 10.26) none of them were found statistically significant predictors for stunting.
Conclusion: The prevalence of under nutrition among adolescents was higher. Thus, integrated nutritional intervention and related school health services should be done for intervening the under nutrition and adolescent’s health, in general.

Keywords: Under nutrition; Stunting; Wasting; School; Ethiopia; Cross sectional

Introduction

Adolescence (10-19 years) is the most important period of life where growth and development are accompanied by various physical, physiological, behavioral and social changes. This leads to increased demand for nutrients that in turn could pose a greater risk of undernutrition [1-3]. Globally, hundreds of millions of people are estimated to be affected by emergency situations all over the world; therefore, a high number of adolescents may present an increased risk of being exposed to under-nutrition. Under-nutrition starts before birth, goes into adolescence and adult life and can span into generations [4,5]. Adolescence under-nutrition is an important determinant of health outcome. Adolescents have different needs and have diverse problems. Under-nutrition in adolescents results in short stature and lean body mass, and is associated with deficiencies in muscular strength and working capacities [6]. This results in problem of low birth weight, which is more common in the offspring of adolescent mothers and is associated with fewer chances for survival and higher infant death rates [6]. Adolescents living in developing countries are suffering by under-nutrition. Especially, in Asia and Africa, the prevalence is higher with magnitude of 32%-65% and 4%-30% restrictively [4,6,7]. In Sub Sahara Africa, the prevalence of adolescence under-nutrition is 15%- 58%, which is higher from other African countries [4,6,7]. According to EDHS 2011, the prevalence of stunting, wasting and underweight among under five children in Ethiopia were 44%, 10% and 29% respectively [8]. Rice consumption, family size, Family radio, infection, vaccination and latrine availability were among the factors associated with under-nutrition [9]. Adolescents remain a neglected age group, because they are considered as difficult to measure and interpret their data, low risk to under-nutrition and hard reaching population or otherwise simply neglected. Hence, information regarding adolescence under-nutrition is inadequate except very few population based studies stated that there is high prevalence of adolescent’s under-nutrition [2]. In light of this, our study aimed to point out the magnitude and determinant factors of adolescent’s undernutrition among primary and secondary school children. The evidence from this study would help programmers and stakeholders in developing and intervening the high prevalence of under-nutrition among adolescents and generally make evidence based decisions.

Materials and Methods

Study design

Cross-sectional study design was conducted to point out the magnitude and determine the associated factors with under-nutrition.

Population and sampling

Data were collected from adolescents in primary and secondary school of Eastern zone of Tigray, 821 kms north to Addis Ababa, the capital city of Ethiopia. Sample size was calculated by Open epi software version 2.3 using the single population proportion formula. The population estimate of under nutrition used to calculate the sample size were 27.5% for underweight, 58.3% for wasting and 26.5% for stunting [1]. With the assumption of these population parameters, maximum sample size was obtained for wasting. Considering additional parameters like 95% CI, 5% of marginal error and 10% non-response rate, the sample size computed was 411. The sample size was allocated using probability proportional sampling for the primary and secondary schools. Two stage stratified cluster sampling was used to select the students from each cluster. Firstly, the classrooms were considered as clusters with the assumptions that students within secondary school were homogenous and so were the students in the primary school. One and three classes were taken from the secondary and primary schools respectively. Secondly to have a control in the sample size, a simple random sampling was used to select the individual students for the study from each school based on the students’ roster.

Data collection process

For collecting information about under-nutrition, pretested structured questionnaire was used. The questions were prepared in English, translated into the local language and back translated to English by another person to maintain its consistency. Data collectors were considered from diploma nurses who had experiences in anthropometric measurements. These data collectors were well trained on how to fill the questionnaire and measure the anthropometric measurements. Adolescents were considered as individuals between the ages of 10 and 19 years. Primary school was considered as institutional school having students from grades 1-8 while secondary school was institutional school having students from grade 9-10. To exclude students whose age is out of the defined domain, age was ascertained from the school registers. Measurements were taken once each for weight and height. The measurements were read to the nearest 0.1 kg and 0.1 cm respectively.

Statistical analysis

Data were entered into a computer using Epi-Info and Exported into SPSS 16 for windows. The data were explored for errors and assumption fulfillments. The prevalence of the different indicators for under-nutrition and other characteristics of the students were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Logistic regression was used to estimate the effect size of the independent factors to under-nutrition using adjusted odds ratio. For both the descriptive and inferential statistics, the population estimates were reported using 95% confidence interval. For all the statistics, P-value less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant in the final model. The body mass index (BMI) was computed by the conventional formula-the quotient of weight (kg) to height (m) squared. Nutritional status was evaluated using anthropometric indicators recommended by 2007 NCHS/ WHO growth reference. Height -for- age (HFA) below -2Z score of 2007 NCHS/WHO reference values were classified as stunting. Wasting was assessed using BMI-for-age below 5th percentile and underweight was assessed using BMI percentile for age for sex.

Ethical consideration

Ethical clearance was obtained from the ethical board of College of Health Sciences, Mekelle University. Support letters were obtained from the Tigray Regional Education Bureau, Tigray Regional Health Bureau and respective district offices. For respondents less than 18 years old, consent was obtained from their parents or care givers and assents from the students. For the 19 years old students, consent was obtained from the students themselves. The aim of the study and the procedures were explained to the students in private before interview and anthropometry measurements. Moreover, they were informed that they had the right to withdraw from the study at any stage of the data acquisition. They were assured that the data they provided would be kept confidential and no any student identifying attributes would be encoded and reported in any report.

Results

Socio-demographic and economic characteristics

A total of 411 respondents participated making a response rate of 100%. Half (50.6%) of the students were females, and majority of them (55.7%) were aged between 15-19 years. Almost all (91.2%) were living with their parents (father and Mother). The occupational distribution of the students’ fathers showed that 258(81.4%) were farmers and 31 (9.8%) were governmental employees. In terms of education, 30% of the respondents’ fathers and 58.4% of mothers were illiterate. More than half (72.5%) of the respondents did not have a nearby garden and 79.1% of the respondents had used hand pump water for drinking. As to the family size distribution of respondents, 76.4% of them were with greater than five family members. Over half of the respondents, 154 (53.7%), possessed at least five cattle whereas 19(6.6%) of the parents owned sixteen and more (Table 1). The mean age, height, weight, BMI and HFA of the respondent were 14.23 yrs, 149 cm, 38 kg, 16.74 kg/m2 and -1.346 Z score respectively.

Variables Categories Frequency %
Sex Males 203 49.4
Females 208 50.6
Age Early adolescents 182 44.28
Late adolescents 229 55.71
Ethnic groups Tigrians 411 100
Religion Orthodox 333 81
Muslim 78 19
Grade 4 79 19.21
Grade 5 58 14.1
Grade level Grade 8 83 20.2
Grade 10 191 46.5
Family size 42009 90 22.27
>5 314 76.4
Parents 375 91.2
Relatives 34 8.3
Care takers orphan committee 1 0.2
others 1 0.2
Illiterate 96 30.9
Only read and write 58 18.6
Fathers’ educational level Grad1-4 63 20.3
Grad 5-8 57 18.3
Grad 9-12 23 7.4
>12 Grad 14 4.5
Illiterate 220 58.4
Only read and write 13 3.4
Mothers’ educational level Grad1-4 65 17.2
Grad 5-8 56 14.9
Grad 9-12 16 4.2
>12 Grad 7 1.9
Illiterate 19 57.6
Only read and write 1 3
Care giver educational level Grad1-4 2 6.1
Grad 5-8 5 15.2
Grad 9-12 3 9.1
>12 Grad 5 9.1
Governmental employee 31 9.8
Private (company employee 13 4.1
Fathers’ occupation Labor (farmer) 258 81.4
Un employee 10 3.2
Others 5 1.6
Elder one 134 32.6
one year 10 2.4
Age  difference between elder brother/sister Two years 69 16.8
Three years 120 29.2
≥four years 78 19
Youngest  one 68 16.5
one year 15 3.6
Age difference between  younger brother/sister Two years 64 15.6
Three years 149 36.3
≥four years 115 28
River 7 1.7
Source of water for drinking Lake 79 19.2
Hand pump 325 79.1
Garden  at near your home Yes 113 27.5
No 298 72.5
Access  to fruits and vegetables Yes 326 79.3
No 85 20.7
Condition of  breakfast Yes 404 98.3
No 7 1.7
Hand washing practice Yes 411 100
42009 154 53.7
Number of cattle’s 42165 85 29.6
42323 29 10.1
>15 19 6.6

Table 1: Socio demographic and Economic Characteristics of Studies Subjects at Agulea village Primary and Secondary School, April 2013 (n=411).

Prevalence of under-nutrition

Under-nutrition was indicated by stunting, wasting and underweight. The prevalence of stunting, wasting and underweight was 25.5%, 44% and 55% respectively. Males were more affected by undernutrition than females. However, the difference was more prevalent in wasting and underweight which exceeds by 21% in males as compare to females (Figure 1). The early age adolescents were more affected by wasting and underweight (Figure 2).

nutrition-food-sciences-school-students

Figure 1: Prevalence of Stunting, Wasting and Underweight by Sex at Eastern zone of Tigray among primary and secondary school students, April, 2013(n=411).

nutrition-food-sciences-primary-students

Figure 2: Prevalence of Stunting Wasting and Underweight by A great Eastern zone of Tigray among primary and secondary school students, April, 2013(N=411).

Factors associated with stunting

The prevalence of stunting was 25.5% and this was higher in males than females. Adolescents who did not start menarche were more stunted than who started with the prevalence of 21.9% and 24.10% respectively. However, no any factor was determined to affect the studying among the attributes collected in this study in the final model (Table 2).

Variable Height for Age    
Category Stuntingn (%) Normal   n (%) COR (95% CI) AOR (95% CI)
Age 42291 46(25.3%) 136(74.7%) 1 1
15-19 59(25.8%) 170(74.2%) 0.975 (0.624,1.523) 0.839 (0.177,3.976)
Sex Male 60(29.6%) 143(70.4%) 1.520 (0.972,2.376) 0.960 (0.197,2.417)
Female 45(21.60%) 163(78.4%) 1 1
Age Difference(young) I’m youngest 16(23.5%) 52(76.5%) 0.462 (0.143,1.495) 2.430 (0.814,7.251)
One year 6(40.0%) 9(60.0%) 0.729 (0.336,1.583) 0.299 (0.056,1.586)
Two years 19(29.70%) 45(70.3%) 1.082 (0.548,2.137) 1.236 (0.429,3.558)
Three years 33(22.1%) 116(77.9%) 0.834 (0.416,1.671) 2.211 (0.931,5.252)
Four years & above 31(27.0%) 84(73.0%) 1 1
Started Menarche Yes 21(21.9%) 75(78.1%) 1 1
No 27(24.10%) 85(75.9%) 1.134 (0.593,2.172) 2.120 (0.799,5.683)
Grade level 4th 18(22.8%) 61(77.2%) 1.416 (0.599,3.349) 0.264 (0.445,19.334)
5th 10(17.2%) 48(82.8%) 0.549 (0.275,1.099) 0.126 (0.645,34.774)
8th 29(34.9%) 54(65.1%) 0.879 (0.473,1.633) 0.863 (0.267,4.839)
10th 48(25.1%) 143(74.9%) 1 1

*P value < 0.05, **P value <0.01 and ***P value<0.001, COR; Crude odds ratio; AOR, Adjusted odds ratio.

Table 2: Factors Associated with Adolescents Stunting at Agulae Primary and Secondary School, April, 2013 (n=411).

Factors associated with wasting

The prevalence of wasting among the students in the study area was 44%. Higher number of early adolescents, 101(55%), were wasted than late adolescents. More males were wasted than females contributing 54.7% versus 45.3% respectively. Adolescent girls who did not start menarche were more wasted than who have started with prevalence of 53.6% and 16.7% respectively. In the multiple logistic regression analysis models, being late adolescent, male and those who experienced menarche were independent predictors for wasting. Early adolescents were 4.6 times more likely to get wasted as compare to late adolescents (AOR=4.68, 95% CI=1.81-12.13). Males were 5.3 times more likely to get wasted compared to females (AOR=5.31, 95% CI=1.73-16.32) and adolescent girls who did not start menarche were 2.6 times more likely to be wasted than girls who started menarche (AOR=2.65, 95% CI=1.006-6.978) (Table 3).

Variable Category BMI for Age COR (95% CI) AOR (95% CI)
Wastedn (%) Normaln (%)
Age 10-14 101(55.5%) 81(44.5%) 2.322 (1.558 ,3.461)*** 4.686 (1.810, 12.130)***
15-19 80(34.9%) 149(65.1%) 1 1
Sex Male 111(54.7%) 92(45.3%) 2.379 (1.596 , 3.544)*** 5.319 (1.733, 16.327)***
Female 70(33.7%) 138(66.3%) 1.00 1.00
Age Difference (young) I’m youngest 24(35.3%) 44(64.7%) 2.145 (1.156, 3.978)* 1.018 (0.184, 5.647)
One year 8(53.3%) 7(46.7%) 1.024 (0.348, 3.010) 0.696 (0.222, 2.182)
Two years 33(51.6%) 31(48.4%) 1.099 (0.596, 2.027) 0.574 (0.222, 1.483)
Three years 54(36.2%) 95(63.8%) 2.058 (1.253, 3.380) 0.494 (0.188, 1.300)
Four years & above 62(53.9%) 53(46.1%) 1.00 1.00
Started Menarche Yes 16(16.7%) 80(83.3%) 1.00 1.00
No 60(53.6%) 52(46.4%) 5.769 (3.004, 11.081)*** 2.650 (1.006, 6.978)*
Grade level 4th 46(58.2%) 33(41.8%) 1.214 (0.613, 2.403) 1.048 (0.386, 2.844)
5th 31(53.4%) 27(46.6%) 1.214 (0.632, 2.192) 1.699 (0.627, 4.602)
8th 45(54.2%) 38(45.8%) 3.119 (1.813, 5.364)*** 4.447 (0.781, 25.335)
10th 59(30.9%) 132(69.1%) 1.00 1.00

*P value < 0.05, **P value <0.01 and ***P value<0.001, COR; Crude odds ratio; AOR, Adjusted odds ratio.

Table 3: Factors Associated with Adolescents Wasting at Agulae Primary and Secondary School, April, 2013 (n=411).

Factors associated with underweight

The prevalence of underweight was 55% and it was high among the early adolescents and male adolescents. Adolescent girls who did experience menarche were more underweight, 72(64.35%), than their counterparts, 27(28.1%). Although age and sex were significant in the bivariate logistic regression, multivariable logistic regression revealed that only experiencing menarche was the predictor for underweight. Adolescent girls who did not experience menarche were 5.5 times more likely to be under weight than those who had experienced menarche (AOR=5.47 95% CI=2.91-10.26) (Table 4).

Variable Category BMI COR (95% CI) AOR (95% CI)
Underweight n (%) Normal n (%)
Age 10-14 115(63.2) 67(36.8%) 1.825 (1.226, 2.715)** 1.660 (0.698, 3.948)
15-19 111(48.5%) 118(51.5%) 1.00 1.00
Sex Male 133(65.5) 70(34.5%) 2.349 (1.578, 3.498)*** 2.750 (0.972, 7.774)
  Female 93(44.7) 115(55.3%) 1.00 1.00
Age difference (youngest) I’m youngest 27(39.7%) 41(60.3%) 2.362 (1.279,4.362)** 0.902 (0.170, 4.784)
One year 10(66.7%) 5(33.3%) 0.778 (0.250,2.425) 0.574 (0.195, 1.684)
Two years 41(64.1%) 23(35.9%) 0.873 (0.063,1.644) 0.610 (0.251, 1.483)
Three years 78(52.3%) 71(47.7%) 1.416 (0.864,2.320) 0.550 (0.219, 1.382)
Four & above 70(60.9%) 45(39.1%) 1.00 1.00
Started Menarche Yes 27(28.1%) 69(71.9%) 1.00 1.00
  No 72(64.35) 40(35.7%) 4.600 (2.552, 8.293)*** 5.467 (2.912, 10.264)***
Grade level 4th 50(63.3%) 29(36.7%) 0.475 (0.277,0.814) 0.488 (0.167, 1.423)
  5th 37(63.8%) 21(36.2%) 0.465 (0.253,0.853) 0.899 (0.329, 2.457)
  8th 53(63.9%) 30(36.1%) 0.464 (0.273,0.788)** 0.792 (0.153, 4.097)
  10th 86(45.0%) 105(55.0%) 1.00 1.00

*P value<0.05, **P value<0.01 and ***P value<0.001, COR; Crude odds ratio; AOR, Adjusted odds ratio.

Table 4: Factors Associated with Adolescents Underweight at Agulae Primary and Secondary School, April, 2013 (n=411).

Discussion

The overall prevalence of stunting, wasting and underweight was 25.5%, 44%, and 55% respectively. Each of these magnitudes was higher compared with studies conducted in India, Africa, and sub-Sahara countries [10,11] but consistent with study done in West Bank [6]. This study revealed that stunting was higher among males than females and this is in congruent with the studies conducted in Tanzania, Senegal, West Bank and India [5,6,11]. This is because in rural Ethiopia adolescent females preferred to cook food, stay at home (they will have less energy expenditure) and they are expected to consume more than male adolescents who prefer to pass their time more of out of home to work the external works, like farming activities with their father. But males are encouraged to be autonomous than female adolescents; as a result, they are more likely to exposed to infection that predispose them to stunting. Adolescent girls who didn’t start menses were more likely to be stunted than those who did. This is consistent with studies conducted in Kenya and Senegal stated that adolescent girls with low Height-for-age z-score are delay to see their menses [6,12]. Generally, adolescents’ girls late to see their menarche are undernourished; it is their low nutritional status makes their menarche to delay. The age of menarche is affected with educational status, economical status and nutritional status [10]. The prevalence of wasting was as high as 44% among the study participants with 54.7% in males and 33.7% in females. This shows that males were more affected by wasting than females. This was consistent with study done in Tunisia and India [2,13]. The possible reasons might be adolescent males have larger skeleton, gain weight at faster rate more muscular and deposit less fat than adolescent females [2]. But as compared to the previous research done among adolescent girls in Tigray it showed decrement by 24% in the last eight years [14]. This decrement could be due to substantial human development and increased awareness of the community. It is important to mention, this study relieved that early adolescents have high proportion of wasting as compare to late adolescents, which is consistent with previous study done in Kenya and India [6,11]. These differences were statically significant with early age category where 4.6 times more likely to be wasted than the referent groups (AOR=4.68, 95% CI=1.81-12.13). This study revealed that adolescent males were 5.3 times more likely to be wasted than their female counterparts (AOR=5.31, 95% CI=1.73- 16.32). This is consistent with the studies done in Tunisia, Kenya and India [3,6,13]. Adolescents who had attained grade 4 constituted higher proportion of wasting than the other random selected class levels. Adolescent girls who did not start their menses were more wasted than who started. Similar result was found study conducted in Kenya [6]. Similar to wasting, early adolescents and male`s had higher proportion of underweight. Adolescent males were 2.7 times more likely to be underweight than the referents (AOR=2.75, 95% CI=.972- 7.71) and adolescent girls who did not start menarche were 5.5 times more likely to be underweight than the referent groups (AOR=5.5, 95% CI=2.912-10.264). Similarly, study from Tanzania and Ambo of Ethiopia also stated that the difference in sex and onset of menarche significantly associated [5]. According to their grade level, grades 8th were more underweight. This study shows that under nutrition is persistent problem of future adults. A 100% of response rate can be strength of the study. But, as it is institutional based, the study had not included adolescents out of schools and it lacks a qualitative method.

Conclusion

Based on the finding, the prevalence of adolescents’ under nutrition is higher in the study area. Male adolescents are more affected by stunting, wasting and underweight than female adolescents. Similarly, early adolescents are more affected by stunting, wasting and underweight than were late adolescents. However, none of these determinate factors was show an association with stunting. But early adolescents, sex and onset of menarche were associated with being wasting. In addition, beginning of menarche was also associated with being underweight. Thus, an integrated nutritional intervention and health related services that meet the needs of adolescents in the school community were recommended for better future adolescents’ health. NGOs should not only focus on under five children’s under nutrition; it is also better to focus on adolescents’ under nutrition and researchers should also conduct further studies adding qualitative method and multicenter and longitudinal study.

Acknowledgment

We are very grateful for the data collectors and study participants. Mekele University granted the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors don’t have any conflict of interest.

References

  1. Helene Delisle, V Chandra-Mouli, Bruno de Benoist(1999) should adolescents be specifically targeted for nutrition in developing countries? To address which problems, and how? WHO: 38.
  2. Vashist BM, Joyti, GoelMK (2009) Nutritional status of adolescents in rural and urban Rohtak, Haryana. Health and population Perspectives Issue 32: 190-197.
  3. Cordeiro LS, Wilde PE, Semu H, etal. (2012) Household Food Security Is Inversely Associated with under nutrition among Adolescents in Kilosa, Tanzania. JN 142: 1741-1747.
  4. Elena Radu, CiotaruLO (2007) Adolescent malnutrition Bucharest, Romania. Proc. Rom. Acad. Series 2:155-158.
  5. Rosen JE (2004)Adolescent health and development: A Resource Guide for World Bank Operations Staff and Government Counterparts. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development Washington.
  6. Debone C, Delisle HF, Receveur O (2011) Poor nutritional status of schoolchildren in urban and peri- urban areas of Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Nutrition Journal 10:34.
  7. Mekonnen H, Tadesse T, Kisi T (2013) Malnutrition and its Correlates among Rural Primary School Children of Fogera District, Northwest Ethiopia. J Nutr Disorders Ther S12:002.
  8. Alemayehu T, Haidar J, Habte D (2010) Adolescents' under nutrition and its determinants among in-school communities of Ambo town, West Oromia, Ethiopia. EAJPH 7:263-267.
  9. Soumyajit, MaitiDebasis De, Chatterjee K, et al (2011) Prevalence of stunting and thinness among early adolescent school girls of Paschimmedinipur district, west Bengal, India. Int. J. Biol Med Res 2: 781-783.
  10. California Department of public health (2012) California Nutrition and Physical Activity Guidelines for Adolescents.
  11. Skhiri AH, Romdhane HB, Traissac P, et al. (2008) Nutritional status of adolescents: associated gender, environmental and socioeconomic factors in Tunisia. Public Health Nutrition 19: 1306-1317.
  12. The Hong Kong Poly technical university school of nursing (2009) Adolescent Health Concerns. Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
Citation: Weres ZG, Yebyo HG, Miruts KB, Gesesew HA, Woldehymanot TE (2015) Assessment of Adolescents’ Under Nutrition Level among School Students in Eastern Tigray, Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Nutr Food Sci 5:402.

Copyright: © 2015 Weres ZG, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top