Journal of Women's Health Care
Open Access

Benckiser's hemorrhage following a vasa previa rupture: an uncommon case report

Mariam Mahtate^1*, Aziz Slaoui², Soukaina Cherradi¹, Najia Zeraidi¹, Brahim Rhrab¹, Amina Lakhdar¹ and Aziz Baydada^{1 *}Correspondence: Mariam Mahtate, Department of Gynecology-Obstetrics and Endoscopy Maternity Souissi, University Hospital Center IBN SINA, University Mohammed V of Rabat, Morocco, Email:

Author info »

Introduction

Vasa previa is an uncommon condition in which the vessels belonging to the fetal circulation in the amniotic membranes cross or run in close proximity to the internal cervical os underneath the presenting part [1]. They can either lead from the placenta to a velamentous cord insertion (Type 1) or connect the main placental plate to a succenturiate lobe (Type 2) [1,2]. Unsupported by the umbilical cord or placental tissue, these vessels can tear causing an uncontrollable hemorrhage, called Benckiser's hemorrhage putting the fetus in distress and leading to rapid fetal death, sometimes within minutes, through exsanguination in utero. This hemorrhage of fetal origin happens most often when the membranes rupture, whether spontaneously or artificially. Sometimes the rupture of the membranes spares these vessels [2,3]. However, the risk of hemorrhage remains present, since it can occur by dilaceration of the vessels during the progression of the fetal presentation in the pelvis [2,4].

The presenting fetal part may also exert direct pressure on the unprotected vessels resulting in fetal distress due to hypoxia [3].

This is why prenatal identification of VP via ultrasound can only be beneficial and make it possible to schedule a prophylactic cesarean section before the onset of fetal death as well as other adverse perinatal outcomes [3,5].

By this case report, we aim to shed light on vasa previa and their risk factors in order to contribute to their antenatal diagnosis and proper management. For this purpose, we present a case of ruptured vasa previa incidentally diagnosed by transvaginal ultrasonography combined with color Doppler in a patient with spontaneous rupture of the membranes and painless vaginal bleeding. She then underwent an emergency cesarean section, giving birth to an anemic female newborn that required immediate resuscitation, including intubation and blood transfusions.

Case Report

We hereby report an uncommon case of a primiparous 36-year-old woman, with no particular pathological history apart from placenta previa diagnosed at 26 weeks of gestation, who presented to the gynecological emergency department at our institution complaining of spontaneous rupture of the membranes and painless vaginal bleeding at a gestational age of 35 weeks.Upon admission, Blood pressure was 118/69 mmHg, Heart rate was 80 beats per minute and normal uterine tone.

TA-USG showed fetal growth appropriate for the gestational age and the placenta attached to posterior uterine wall. TV-USG revealed placental location at 1.35cm from the internal cervical os. (Figure 1) Furthermore, membranous fetal vessels were observed to pass across the cervical internal os using real-time color Doppler ultrasonography. (Figure 2) Therefore, a diagnosis of low-lying placenta complicated by vasa previa was made.

Figure 1. Trans-vaginal ultrasonography showing a low-lying placenta located at 1.35 cm from the internal cervical os.

Figure 2. Transvaginal view and Color Doppler mode showing the presence of fetal blood vessels covering the internal cervical os and under the fetal presenting part, consistent with a diagnosis of vasa previa.

The fetal heart rate in the cardiotocographic recording showed a sinusoidal pattern.

An emergency caesarean section was then immediately performed for suspected ruptured vasa praevia, allowing the birth of a pale female newborn weighing 2580 g, with Apgar scores 3 and 6 at 1 and 5 min respectively, requiring immediate resuscitation and admission in neonatal intensive care unit for blood transfusions.

Placental examination after delivery was consistent with our diagnosis of a velamentous cord insertion with rupture of one of the vessels running along the membranes. Postpartum period was uneventful and the patient was discharged on the fourth day after delivery. The baby was discharged from NICU in a healthy condition after 2 weeks of admission with hemoglobin at 14.5g/dl.

Discussion

Vasa praevia is an uncommon but serious condition, with an estimated incidence ranging from 1 in 2000 to 1 in 6000 pregnancies [4,6]. However, its true incidence has been underreported as it may be mistaken for placental abruption or placenta previa [6].

Whereas the exact cause of VP is unclear, several risk factors have been reported, which include velamentous cord insertion, bilobed or succenturiate placenta and second-trimester low-lying placenta or placenta praevia. Pregnancies conceived via IVF, multiple gestations, and prior uterine surgeries may also increase the risk of vasa previa [7-10]. Our patient had history of second trimester complete placenta previa; its upward migration and resolution resulted in velamentous cord insertion. Several case reports have demonstrated the ability of ultrasonography and color Doppler to diagnose vasa praevia prenatally in high risk pregnancies, preventing then the onset of complications related to their rupture [11,12]. Unfortunately, detailed prenatal ultrasonography screening for vasa previa was not performed in our case. Oyelese compared women who received prenatal diagnosis to those who did not and reported neonatal survival rates of 97% and 44% respectively, and blood transfusion rates of 3.4% and 58.5% respectively.

The classic clinical presentation of VP rupture is painless vaginal bleeding (also known as Benckiser’s hemorrhage) at time of spontaneous rupture of membranes, amniotomy or cervical dilatation; accompanied by fetal heart rate irregularities [10,13]. In our case, transvaginal ultrasonography combined with color Doppler incidentally showed fetal blood vessels coursing over the internal cervical os; the occurrence of vaginal bleeding and a sinusoidal heart-rate pattern reflecting fetal anemia were consistent with the diagnosis of ruptured vasa previa. Spontaneous rupture of membranes was the reason behind this rupture.

The bleeding that occurs, even if it is sparse, usually results in hypovolemic shock of the newborn; as the total blood volume of the fetus at term is approximately 80–100 ml/kg [9]. Only rapid extraction associated with resuscitation and neonatal transfusions reduce mortality and neonatal morbidity [9,12]. This is why antenatal screening of vasa previa can only be beneficial and make it possible to schedule a prophylactic cesarean section before the onset of these complications [9]. Our patient underwent an emergency cesarean section, giving birth to an anemic female newborn, which required immediate resuscitation, including intubation and blood transfusions; the neonate outcome has then improved and was discharged from NICU with hemoglobin at 14.5g/dl.

Thus, several authors emphasize that, in the presence of confirmed vasa previa, an elective caesarean section should be carried out prior to the onset of labor, most often around 34–36 weeks, avoiding rupture of membranes and fetal exsanguination, while taking into consideration the impact of iatrogenic prematurity [9-12].

As the aim of surgery is to prevent rupture of aberrant vessels, it is recommended to start the hysterotomy with a superficial transverse incision, allowing the visualization of the blood vessels oriented towards the cervix. An amniotomy avoiding these vessels can then be carried out to allow delivery of the fetus [13].

Conclusion

Vasa praevia is an uncommon condition in which the most feared complication is Benckiser's hemorrhage. Prenatal diagnosis is thus of paramount importance, allowing an elective caesarean section, and therefore prevents potential rupture of the low-lying vessel(s) and subsequent fetal demise or neonatal morbidity.

Declarations

Guarantor of Submission

The corresponding author is the guarantor of submission.

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

There are no funding sources to be declared.

Availability of data and materials

Supporting material is available if further analysis is needed.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in- Chief of this journal.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval has been obtained to proceed with the current study. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for participation in this publication.

References

1. Melcer Y, Jauniaux E, Maymon S. Impact of targeted scanning protocols on perinatal outcomes in pregnancies at risk of placenta accreta spectrum or vasa praevia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(4):443-443.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

2. Rachel G, Sinkey MD, Anthony O, Odibo MD. Diagnosis and management of vasa previa. AJOG.
   2015;213(5):615-619.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

3. Sullivan EA, Javid N, Duncombe G, Li Z, Safi N, Cincotta R, et al. Vasa praevia Diagnosis, Clinical Practice, and Outcomes in Australia. OBGYN. 2017;130(3):591-598.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

4. Oyelese KO, Turner M, Lees C, Campbell S. Vasa praevia: an avoidable obstetric tragedy. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1999;54:138–145.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

5. Mulot S, Valentin L, Dreyfus M, Benoist G. Vasa previa: when and how to look for vasa previa in ultrasound and what care to offer patients in case of discovery of vasa previa? About four cases and review of the literature. J Perinat Med. 2018;10(2):114-119.

Cross Ref

6. Stafford IP, Neumann DE, Jarrell H. Abnormal placental structure and vasa previa: confirmation of the relationship. JUM. 2004;23(11):1521-1522.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

7. McQueen V, Speed M, Rutter S, Gray T. Vasa praevia: Should we routinely screen high-risk women for this rare but serious condition? Ultrasound. 2018;26(2):127–131.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

8. Gagnon R, Morin L, Bly S. Directive clinique sur la prise en charge du vasa praevia. J Obstet Gynecol Can. 2009;31:754–760.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

9. Carbonnel M, Tigaizin A, Carbillon L. Vasa praevia: à propos d’un cas. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 35:327–9.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

10. Ruiter L, Kok N, Limpens J, Derks JB, De Graaf IM, Mol BW, et al. A systematic review on the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of vasa praevia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;45:516–522.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

11. Lijoi AF, Brady J. Vasa previa diagnosis and management. JABFM. 2003;16(6):543-548.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

12. Oyelese Y, Catanzarite V, Prefumo F, Lashley S, Schachter M, Tovbin Y, et al. Vasa previa: the impact of prenatal diagnosis on outcomes. OB GYN. 2004;103(5):937-942.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

13. Tsakiridis I, Mamopoulos A, Athanasiadis A, Dagklis T. Diagnosis and management of vasa previa: a comparison of 4 national guidelines. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2019;74(7):436-442.

Indexed at, Google Scholar