Journal of Proteomics & Bioinformatics

Journal of Proteomics & Bioinformatics
Open Access

ISSN: 0974-276X

Review Article - (2018) Volume 11, Issue 6

Blood-based DNA Methylation Biomarkers for Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer

Lixin Dong1 and Hongmei Ren2*
1Mumetel LLC, University Technology Park at IIT, Chicago, IL 60616, USA
2Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Wright State University, 3640 Colonel Glenn Hwy., Dayton, OH 45435-0001, USA
*Corresponding Author: Hongmei Ren, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Wright State University, Ohio 45435, USA, Tel: + (937) 775- 4693, Fax: + (937) 775-3730

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Early detection of CRC can significantly reduce this mortality rate. Unfortunately, recommended screening modalities, including colonoscopy, are hampered by poor patient acceptance, low sensitivity and high cost. Recent studies have demonstrated that colorectal oncogenesis is a multistep event resulting from the accumulation of a variety of genetic and epigenetic changes in colon epithelial cells, which can be reflected by epigenetic alterations in blood. DNA methylation is the most extensively studied dysregulated epigenetic mechanism in CRC. In this review, we focus on current knowledge on DNA methylation as potential blood-based biomarkers for early detection of CRC.

Keywords: Colorectal cancer; Blood-based biomarkers; DNA methylation; Early detection

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of death worldwide, accounting for around 754, 000 deaths in 2015 [1]. The World Health Organization estimates a substantial increase in the number of newly diagnosed CRC cases worldwide and an 80% rise in deaths from CRC by 2030 [2]. The early detection of CRC significantly improves the prognosis of patients and is a key factor in reducing the mortality of CRC. The cancer can be cured by surgical procedures if it is diagnosed early, specifically before metastasis is established. The 5-year relative survival rate for early-stage CRC is 90%; for advanced stage IV CRC, the rate drops to about 14% [3]. However, only about 4 out of 10 CRC patients are diagnosed at the early stage [4], partially due to poor patient acceptance and/or sensitivity of available screening modalities.

Four types of tests are currently available for CRC detection or screening, including fecal-based occult blood test (FOBT or FIT), tumor marker blood test, combined fecal DNA and FOBT test, and colonoscopy. Colonoscopy screening is currently the standard method for the detection of CRC [5]. However, colonoscopy screening requires bowel preparation and sedation, and is associated with high cost, possible complications and low compliance. The specificity or sensitivity of FOBT is not sufficient [6], and compliance is low due to the inconvenience of sampling and the interference of the test results by many factors [7,8]. Although lab tests such as stool occult blood and recently introduced stool DNA test offer indications for possible CRC, there is a high false positive rate when using those tests. Therefore, robust diagnostic non-invasive biomarkers are urgently needed to detect early stage of CRC.

Both genetic and epigenetic alterations have been found to be involved in the carcinogenesis of CRC [9-11]. The prevailing consensus suggests that epigenetic alterations occur early and more frequently than genetic alterations in CRC [12]. The epigenetic alterations include aberrant DNA methylation, histone modifications and expression of microRNAs (miRNAs) and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) [13]. Post-translational modifications of histones regulate the packaging structure of DNA (called chromatin). Active DNA regions are marked with H3K4me2- or me3 and/or H3, H4 acetylation, while H3K9me3 or H3K27me3 represses genomic regions [14]. Gezer et al. observed reduced plasma levels H3K9me3 and H4K20me3 as potential diagnostic biomarkers for CRC [15]. The miRNA post transcriptionally downregulates gene expression through binding to a complementary site that resides on the 3’-untranslated region of target mRNAs [14]. Many miRNAs associated with CRC diagnosis and prognosis have been identified in patient blood. For example, miR-21 is overexpressed in the plasma or serum of patients with CRC [16], suggesting that it is a promising noninvasive biomarker for the early detection of CRC. Among the epigenetic mechanisms, DNA methylation is the most widely studied and a crucial epigenetic marker in cancer. In this review, we provide an overview of the role of DNA methylation alterations in CRC and discuss the clinical application of these changes as biomarkers for early detection of CRC.

DNA methylation in CRC

CRC results from the accumulation of both genetic and epigenetic changes that transform normal glandular epithelium into invasive adenocarcinoma [17]. Most CRCs develop through two different morphological multistep pathways, including the classical adenoma-carcinoma sequence and the serrated neoplasia pathway [18]. Over the past 25 years, the molecular basis of this process has been progressively clarified. There are at least three distinct molecular pathways in CRC pathogenesis: the chromosomal instability (CIN), microsatellite instability (MSI) and CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) pathways (Figure 1) [19]. About 65% of CRC arise through the CIN pathway, which is characterized by widespread imbalances in chromosome number (aneuploidy) and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) [20]. Mutations have been reported in oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes, including adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), β-catenin, K-Ras (KRAS), B-Raf (BRAF), F-box and WD repeat domain containing 7 (FBXW7), transcription factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2), G protein subunit alpha S (GNAS), chromobox 4 (CBX4), SMAD family member 4 (SMAD4), p53, ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif 18 protein (ADAMTS18), TATA-box binding protein associated factor 1 like (TAF1L), APC membrane recruitment protein 1 (AMER1/ FAM123B), CUB and sushi multiple domains 3 (CSMD3), integrin subunit beta 4 (ITGB4), LDL receptor related protein 1B (LRP1B), and spectrin repeat containing nuclear envelope protein 1 (SYNE1) [21]. MSI occurs in around 15% of all CRC tumors and in 90% of CRC occurring in Lynch syndrome patients [22,23]. Mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes (such as MSH2, MLH1, MSH6, and PMS2) result in a failure to repair errors in repetitive sequences, leading to MSI of tumors [24]. Approximately 20% of CRC is associated with CIMP tumors [25-28]. A commonly used panel for defining CIMP is one suggested by Weisenberger et al. which includes neurogenin 1 (NEUROG1), suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 (SOCS1), runt related transcription factor 3 (RUNX3), insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF2), and calcium voltage-gated channel subunit alpha1 G (CACNA1G) [29,30]. CIMP-positive tumors exhibit unique clinical, pathological, and molecular features, including a predilection for proximal location in the colon, female gender, poor and mucinous histology, and the presence of frequent KRAS and BRAF mutations [31]. Patterns of mutated genes vary according to the class of CRC. BRAF mutations seem prevalent in MSI [32-34], whereas p53 gene mutations are found in CIN [35]. Despite the differences, these three pathways are not mutually exclusive. A tumor can occasionally exhibit features of multiple pathways. For example, up to 25% of MSI cancers exhibit chromosomal abnormalities [36]; CIMP accounts for most of the MSI-positive CRCs [37]; up to 33% of CIMP-positive tumors exhibit a high degree of chromosomal aberrations and as many as 12% of CIN-positive tumors exhibit high levels of MSI [38,39]. The most common signaling pathways that carry mutant genes in CRC include the RAS/RAF/ MAPK pathway, the PI3K pathway, the WNT/APC/CTNNB1 pathway and the TGFβ1/SMAD pathway [40]. Inactivation of APC leads to upregulation of the Wingless/Wnt pathway, a common mechanism for initiating colorectal adenoma formation [41]. Mutations in KRAS or BRAF aberrantly activate the MAPK signaling pathway, thus inducing proliferation and suppressing apoptosis [42,43].

proteomics-bioinformatics-cancer-pathogenesis

Figure 1: Multiple genetic pathways in colorectal cancer pathogenesis.

It is now accepted that DNA methylation alterations are as significant as genetic mutations in driving CRC development. In fact, many more genes are affected by aberrant methylation than by mutations in the average colon cancer genome [12,44,45]. DNA methylation refers to the enzymatic addition of a methyl group to the 5'-position of cytosine by DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) to produce 5-methylcytosine [46]. The majority of CpG dinucleotides in the human genome are methylated [47,48]. CpG islands indicate regions with at least 200 bp, a GC percentage greater than 50%, and an observed-to-expected CpG ratio > 0.6 [49]. In contrast to CpG dinucleotides, CpG islands typically located in the promoter of protein-coding genes are normally unmethylated in normal healthy cells [50- 52]. It has long been established that cancer is characterized by global hypomethylation and hypermethylation at selected CpG islands, which contributes to tumorigenesis by aberrant silencing of tumor suppressor genes [53].

The global DNA hypomethylation is believed to influence CRC development by inducing chromosomal instability and leading to loss of imprinting [54]. The global loss of DNA methylation occurs predominantly within repetitive transposable DNA elements, such as long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1) and short interspersed transposable element (SINE or Alu elements) sequences [55-61]. DNA hypomethylation can be found in the colon in an age-dependent fashion [62,63] as well as early events in CRC development [64].

Multiple blood-based DNA methylation biomarkers

Many cells and tissues release some of their constituents to the bloodstream, including fragmented, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) which can also arise from tumor cells, i.e., circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Tumor-specific genetic and epigenetic alterations found in cfDNA are likely to represent a mixture of alterations in primary tumor and/or metastatic sites [65]. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in the blood circulation of cancer patients (as liquid biopsy) have emerged as key biomarkers for cancer monitoring and treatment decision making [66]. DNA methylation has been used as a diagnostic CRC marker because specific methylation events occurring early in multistep carcinogenesis have been identified and epigenetic gene silencing plays a causative role in CRC development [67-72]. Aberrant DNA methylation occurs in the blood of adenoma patients, making DNA methylation biomarkers feasible to detect CRC early [73,74]. Blood-based DNA methylation is mainly derived from cell-free nucleic acid released from circulating cells in serum or plasma or DNA extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes or whole blood cells.

Septin-9 (SEPT9)

SEPT9 is one of the most extensively studied genes as a blood-based biomarker for CRC patients [75-80]. It belongs to the gene family that encodes a group of GTP-binding and filament-forming proteins involved in cytoskeletal formation and cell cycle control [81]. It has promoter hypermethylation reaching sensitivities ranging from 51% to 90.0%, and the specificity from 73% to 96% in serum or plasma samples of CRC patients [75-80]. However, the sensitivity of the methylated SEPT9 assay in detecting advanced adenomas is low (9.6%) [79], suggesting that this gene alone might be of limited value in detecting precancerous lesions.

Human MutL homolog 1 (MLH1)

As described earlier, MLH1 is linked to MSI in CRC [22]. Grady et al. found aberrant hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter in the sera of 9 out of 19 (47%) cases of CRC [82]. Leung et al. monitored promoter hypermethylation in three genes, APC, MLH1, and helicase-like transcription factor (HLTF), and found at least one of the three genes with methylated promoter DNA in the sera of 28 out of 49 CRC patients, which gave a sensitivity of 57% and specificity of 90% [83].

APC

APC gene promoter hypermethylation has been described to explain the sustained activation of the Wnt signaling pathway [84]. PARK et al. [85] examined the methylation status of the APC gene along with other 4 genes including mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 4 (SMAD4), fragile histidine triad protein (FHIT), death-associated protein kinase 1 (DAPK1), and E-cadherin in the peripheral blood plasma of 60 CRC patients, 40 patients with adenomatous and 60 healthy controls using methylation-specific PCR single-strand conformation polymorphism (MSP–SSCP) analysis. The APC marker displayed a sensitivity of 57% for the detection of CRC at a specificity of 86%, and a sensitivity of 57% and specificity of 89% in stage I of CRC.

Cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A)/p16

CDKN2A is an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) and CDK6, and it functions as a tumor suppressor [86]. Furthermore, it is among the panel of surrogate markers used to evaluate CIMP phenotype [87]. The studies of Zou et al. [88], Nakayama et al. [89] and Lecomte et al. [90] examined the aberrant promoter hypermethylation of CDKN2A (p16) in serum of CRC patients and yielded 70% (23 out of 34 patients), 69% (31 out of 45 patients) and 68% (31 out of 45 patients) sensitivity, respectively. Nakayama et al. [91] further analyzed CDKN2A/p16 hypermethylation as a marker for CRC recurrence; 8 out of 21 CRC detected p16 hypermethylation in preoperative serum samples and 13 out of 21 CRC detected p16 hypermethylation in primary tumor biopsies suggesting its potential role in recurrence of CRC.

LINE-1

In addition to hypermethylated genes, DNA hypomethylation status of genes is associated with prognosis of CRC patients. LINE-1 repeat elements were progressively hypomethylated in the normal-adenoma-cancer sequence [92]. Nagai et al. [93] examined 114 plasma samples of CRC patients, and quantified LINE-1 hypomethylation status in plasma cfDNA by absolute quantitative analysis of methylated alleles (AQAMA) real-time PCR. Detection of early stage I/II CRC through cfDNA LINE-1 hypomethylation index (LHI) was accomplished with 63.2% sensitivity and 90.0% specificity, suggesting the potential utility of cfDNA LHI as a blood biomarker for early CRC detection [93]. The efficacy of this assay has been validated in several previous studies [60,61,94,95].

DNA methylation is involved in the process of CRC initiation, progression and metastasis. DNA methylation biomarkers discriminate among clinical stages and predict disease progression. For example, in early stages of the serrated pathway, mutation of BRAF elevates the expression of tumor suppressor genes p16 and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 (IGFBP7) holding the microvesicular hyperplastic polyp (MVHP) to a small and nonprogressive lesion [96]. Aberrant CpG island methylation of the promoter region of p16 and IGFBP7 bypasses this dormant state and drives MVHPs further to sessile serrated adenomas (SSAs) [97]. In blood samples, hypermethylated ALX4 [80,98], NEUROG1 [99], APC [100], 6-O-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase (MGMT) [101], MLH1 [82], HLTF [102], Ras association domain family member 2 (RASSF2A) [101], Syndecan 2 (SDC2) [103], SEPT9, Preprotachykinin-1 (TAC1) [104] and WIF1 [101] were detected in early stage CRC; hypermethylated HPP1, HLTF, secreted Frizzled Related Protein 2 (SFRP2) [105], VIM [106], tissue factor pathway inhibitor 2 (TFPI2) [107,108] and p16 [89] were found positively correlated with distant tumor metastasis; hypermethylated ALX4, fibrillin-2 (FBN2), HPP1 (Alias TMEFF2) [102], HLTF [83], p16 [91], TMEFF1 [102] and VIM [99] were associated with poor prognosis; and hypermethylated HLTF [109], HPP1 [109], runt-related transcription factor 3 (RUNX3) [110], p16 [91] and TFPI2 [107,108] were associated with CRC recurrence. It is conceivable that a robust biomarker panel of methylated genes will be developed into a clinically accurate CRC screening method in the future, and the development of blood-based biomarkers should improve patient compliance and the detection of CRC at early stage.

Until now, only one blood-based assay that detects methylated SEPT9 was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for CRC screening under the name Epi proColon® (Epigenomics, Berlin, Germany). In a screening-like cohort study, the assay was compared to the reference standard FIT test (100 ng/mL cutoff) in 97 CRC cases (stage I-IV) and 193 non-CRC controls [111]. Epi proColon 2.0 had a sensitivity of 72.2% with a specificity of 80.8%. Conversely, the FIT test had a sensitivity of 68% at a specificity of 97.4% [111]. SEPT9 combined with ALX4 and HPP1 was tested in plasma from 182 CRC cases (stage I-III) and 170 healthy controls and yielded a sensitivity of 80.7% at a specificity of 90% [112]. Various DNA methylation biomarkers reported in clinical studies have been listed in Table 1. Larger clinical trials are needed to further validate these gene biomarkers.

Gene Name Pathway Sample size
(CRC/Control)
Sensitivity Specificity Reference
SEPT9 Septin9 Cell cycle control, ERK signaling and bacterial invasion of epithelial cells 53/1457 48.2 91.5 Church [79]
1031 76.6 95.9 Wu [114]
252/102 48 90 Grutzmann [115]
85/324 38.7 81 Song [116]
44/1500 68 - Potter [117]
135/185 69 86 Lofton-Day [77]
IKZF1/BCAT1 Ikaros family zinc finger protein 1/ Branched-chain amino acid transaminase 1 Viral mRNA translation and metabolism 129/1976 66 95 Pedersen [118]
66/1315 62 92 Symonds [119]
WIF-1/NPY WNT inhibitory factor 1/ Neuropeptide Y Notch and Wnt signaling 243/276 86.5 92.1 Lee [101]
ALX4 Aristaless-like homeobox 4 DNA binding transcription factor activity and protein heterodimerization activity 30/30 83.3 70 Ebert [120]
135/185 69 86 Lofton-Day [77]
193/102 90.7 72.5 Rasmussen [121]
182/170 48 87 He [112]
NEUROG1 Neurogenin 1 Neural crest differentiation and signaling pathways regulating pluripotency of stem cells 252/93 61 91 Herbst [99]
VIM Vimentin Wnt signaling pathway 81/110 59 93 Li [122]
239/25 32.6 - Shirahata [123]
193/102 90.7 72.5 Rasmussen [121]
NGFR Nerve growth factor receptor Apoptotic pathways in synovial fibroblasts and p75 (NTR) - mediated signaling 133/179 51 84 Lofton-Day [77]
HPP1 (TMEFF2) Hyperpigmentation, progressive, 1 Validated targets of C-MYC transcriptional repression 133/179 65 65 Lofton-Day [77]
95/32 20 93.7 Herbst [99]
182/170 81 90 He [112]
38/20 18 100 Wallner [124]
MLH1 mutL homolog 1 DNA mismatch repair pathway 38/20 21 100 Wallner [124]
49/41 43 98 Leung [83]
CDKN2A (p16) Cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 2A Cell cycle regulatory pathway 44/50 68 - Nakayama [125]

Table 1: Overview of blood-based biomarker in clinical studies of CRC.

Using ctDNA for early cancer diagnosis is challenging due to the low amount of tumor DNA released in the circulation. The recent development of new technologies such as droplet-based digital PCR (ddPCR) or next generation sequencing (NGS) has greatly improved the sensitivity and specificity for the detection of tumor-specific alterations [113]. The bisulfite sequencing provides single base resolution for broad profiling of DNA methylation, whereas ddPCR allows absolute quantification of target DNA methylation and may be suited for clinical decision-making.

Discussion and Conclusion

CRC continues to be a significant public health burden and the 5-year prognosis for metastatic CRC is still less than 15% [3]. Aberrant methylation of specific genes measured in blood samples could be used as a CRC biomarker and provide prognostic information. CRC is a heterogeneous disease and DNA methylation biomarkers based on single gene have limited sensitivity and specificity. Further studies are therefore needed to perform a genome-wide search to produce a panel of sensitive and specific DNA methylation markers for the early detection of CRC.

Acknowledgment

This project was supported by Startup funds from Wright State University, the NIH Center of Biomedical Research Excellence on Obesity and Cardiovascular Diseases (P20 GM103527-06), Beginning Grant-in-Aid (11BGIA7710059), and Scientist Development Grant (12SDG12050697) from the American Heart Association.

References

  1. NIH Cancer Stat Facts: Colorectal Cancer (2018) https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/colorect.html
  2. Binefa G, Rodriguez-Moranta F, Teule A, Medina-Hayas M (2014) Colorectal cancer: from prevention to personalized medicine. World J Gastroenterol 20: 6786-6808.
  3. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fedewa SA, Ahnen DJ, Barzi A, et al. (2017) Colorectal cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 67: 177-193.
  4. American Cancer Society (2018) https://www.cancer.org/cancer/colon-rectal-cancer/detection-diagnosis-staging/detection.html
  5. Rex DK, Boland CR, Dominitz JA, Giardiello FM, Johnson DA, et al. (2017) Colorectal Cancer Screening: Recommendations for Physicians and Patients from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 112: 1016-1030.
  6. Morikawa T, Kato J, Yamaji Y, Wada R, Mitsushima T, et al. (2005) A comparison of the immunochemical fecal occult blood test and total colonoscopy in the asymptomatic population. Gastroenterology 129: 422-428.
  7. Yu H, Son GM, Joh YG (2013) The clinical significance of preoperative serum levels of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in colorectal cancer. J Korean Surg Soc 84: 231-237.
  8. Oono Y, Iriguchi Y, Doi Y, Tomino Y, Kishi D, et al. (2010) A retrospective study of immunochemical fecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer detection. Clin Chim Acta 411: 802-805.
  9. Miranda E, Destro A, Malesci A, Balladore E, Bianchi P, et al. (2006) Genetic and epigenetic changes in primary metastatic and nonmetastatic colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 95: 1101-1107.
  10. Nosho K, Yamamoto H, Takahashi T, Mikami M, Taniguchi H, et al. (2007) Genetic and epigenetic profiling in early colorectal tumors and prediction of invasive potential in pT1 (early invasive) colorectal cancers. Carcinogenesis 28: 1364-1370.
  11. Pancione M, Remo A, Colantuoni V (2012) Genetic and epigenetic events generate multiple pathways in colorectal cancer progression. Patholog Res Int 2012: 509348.
  12. Danese E, Minicozzi AM, Benati M, Montagnana M, Paviati E, et al. (2015) Comparison of genetic and epigenetic alterations of primary tumors and matched plasma samples in patients with colorectal cancer. PLoS One 10: e0126417.
  13. Vaiopoulos AG, Athanasoula K, Papavassiliou AG (2014) Epigenetic modifications in colorectal cancer: molecular insights and therapeutic challenges. Biochim Biophys Acta 1842: 971-980.
  14. Pillai RS (2005) MicroRNA function: multiple mechanisms for a tiny RNA? RNA 11: 1753-1761.
  15. Gezer U, Ustek D, Yoruker EE, Cakiris A, Abaci N, et al. (2013) Characterization of H3K9me3- and H4K20me3-associated circulating nucleosomal DNA by high-throughput sequencing in colorectal cancer. Tumour Biol 34: 329-336.
  16. Toiyama Y, Takahashi M, Hur K (2013) Serum miR-21 as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarker in Colorectal Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 105: 849-859.
  17. Bardhan K, Liu K (2013) Epigenetics and colorectal cancer pathogenesis. Cancers 5: 676-713.
  18. Longacre TA, Fenoglio-Preiser CM (1990) Mixed hyperplastic adenomatous polyps/serrated adenomas. A distinct form of colorectal neoplasia. Am J Surg Pathol 14: 524-537.
  19. Bae JM, Kim JH, Kang GH (2016) Molecular Subtypes of Colorectal Cancer and Their Clinicopathologic Features, With an Emphasis on the Serrated Neoplasia Pathway. Arch Pathol Lab Med 140: 406-412.
  20. Pino MS, Chung DC (2010) The chromosomal instability pathway in colon cancer. Gastroenterology 138: 2059-2072.
  21. Schell MJ, Yang M, Teer JK, Lo FY, Madan A, et al. (2016) A multigene mutation classification of 468 colorectal cancers reveals a prognostic role for APC. Nat Commun 7: 11743.
  22. Boland CR, Goel A (2010) Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 138: 2073-2087 e2073.
  23. Zhang X, Li J (2013) Era of universal testing of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 5: 12-19.
  24. Berginc G, Bracko M, Ravnik-Glavac M, Glavac D (2009) Screening for germline mutations of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 genes in Slovenian colorectal cancer patients: implications for a population specific detection strategy of Lynch syndrome. Fam Cancer 8: 421-429.
  25. Toyota M, Ahuja N, Ohe-Toyota M, Herman JG, Baylin SB, et al. (1999) CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 8681-8686.
  26. van Rijnsoever M, Grieu F, Elsaleh H, Joseph D, Iacopetta B, et al. (2002) Characterisation of colorectal cancers showing hypermethylation at multiple CpG islands. Gut 51: 797-802.
  27. van Rijnsoever M, Elsaleh H, Joseph D, McCaul K, Iacopetta B, et al. (2003) CpG island methylator phenotype is an independent predictor of survival benefit from 5-fluorouracil in stage III colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 9: 2898-2903.
  28. Samowitz WS, Albertsen H, Herrick J, Levin TR, Sweeney C, et al. (2005) Evaluation of a large, population-based sample supports a CpG island methylator phenotype in colon cancer. Gastroenterology 129: 837-845.
  29. Weisenberger DJ, D Siegmund K, Campan M, Young J, Long TI, et al. (2006) CpG island methylator phenotype underlies sporadic microsatellite instability and is tightly associated with BRAF mutation in colorectal cancer. Nature Genetics 38: 787-793.
  30. Ogino S, Nosho K, Kirkner GJ, Kawasaki T, Meyerhardt JA, et al. (2009) CpG island methylator phenotype, microsatellite instability, BRAF mutation and clinical outcome in colon cancer. Gut 58: 90-96.
  31. Ogino S, Goel A (2008) Molecular classification and correlates in colorectal cancer. J Mol Diagn 10: 13-27.
  32. Birgisson H, Edlund K, Wallin U, Påhlman L, Kultima HG, et al. (2015) Microsatellite instability and mutations in BRAF and KRAS are significant predictors of disseminated disease in colon cancer. BMC Cancer 15.
  33. Kambara T, Simms LA, Whitehall VL, Spring KJ, Wynter CV, et al. (2004) BRAF mutation is associated with DNA methylation in serrated polyps and cancers of the colorectum. Gut 53: 1137-1144.
  34. Deng GR, Bell I, Crawley S, Gum J, Terdiman JP, et al. (2004) BRAF mutation is frequently present in sporadic colorectal cancer with methylated hMLH1, but not in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 10: 191-195.
  35. Hanel W, Moll UM (2012) Links between mutant p53 and genomic instability. J Cell Biochem 113: 433-439.
  36. Sinicrope FA, Rego RL, Halling KC, Foster N, Sargent DJ, et al. (2006) Prognostic impact of microsatellite instability and DNA ploidy in human colon carcinoma patients. Gastroenterology 131: 729-737.
  37. Worthley DL, Leggett BA (2010) Colorectal cancer: molecular features and clinical opportunities. Clin Biochem Rev 31: 31-38.
  38. Cheng YW, Pincas H, Bacolod MD, Schemmann G, Giardina SF, et al. (2008) CpG island methylator phenotype associates with low-degree chromosomal abnormalities in colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 14: 6005-6013.
  39. Shen LL, Toyota M, Kondo Y, Lin E, Zhang L, et al. (2007) Integrated genetic and epigenetic analysis identifies three different subclasses of colon cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 18654-18659.
  40. Pritchard CC, Grady WM (2011) Colorectal cancer molecular biology moves into clinical practice. Gut 60: 116-129.
  41. Najdi R, Holcombe RF, Waterman ML (2011) Wnt signaling and colon carcinogenesis: Beyond APC. J Carcinog 10: 5.
  42. Burotto M, Chiou VL, Lee JM, Kohn EC (2014) The MAPK pathway across different malignancies: A new perspective. Cancer 120: 3446-3456.
  43. Roring M, Brummer T (2012) Aberrant B-Raf signaling in human cancer -10 years from bench to bedside. Crit Rev Oncog 17: 97-121.
  44. Tsai HC, Baylin SB (2011) Cancer epigenetics: linking basic biology to clinical medicine. Cell Res 21: 502-517.
  45. Schuebel KE, Chen W, Cope L, Glöckner SC, Suzuki H, et al. (2007) Comparing the DNA hypermethylome with gene mutations in human colorectal cancer. PLoS Genet 3: 1709-1723.
  46. Moore LD, Le T, Fan G (2013) DNA methylation and its basic function. Neuropsychopharmacology 38: 23-38.
  47. Coulondre C, Miller JH, Farabaugh PJ, Gilbert W (1978) Molecular basis of base substitution hotspots in Escherichia coli. Nature 274: 775-780.
  48. Bird AP (1980) DNA methylation and the frequency of CpG in animal DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 8: 1499-1504.
  49. Hackenberg M, Barturen G, Carpena P, Luque-Escamilla PL, Previti C, et al. (2010) Prediction of CpG-island function: CpG clustering vs. sliding-window methods. BMC Genomics 11: 327.
  50. Gardiner-Garden M, Frommer M (1987) CpG islands in vertebrate genomes. J Mol Biol 196: 261-282.
  51. Strichman-Almashanu LZ, Lee RS, Onyango PO, Perlman E, Flam F, et al. (2002) A genome-wide screen for normally methylated human CpG islands that can identify novel imprinted genes. Genome Res 12: 543-554.
  52. De Smet C, Lurquin C, Lethe B, Martelange V, Boon T, et al. (1999) DNA methylation is the primary silencing mechanism for a set of germ line- and tumor-specific genes with a CpG-rich promoter. Molecular and Cellular Biology 19: 7327-7335.
  53. Frigola J, Sole X, Paz MF, Moreno V, Esteller M, et al. (2005) Differential DNA hypermethylation and hypomethylation signatures in colorectal cancer. Hum Mol Genet 14: 319-326.
  54. Ashktorab H, Brim H (2014) DNA Methylation and Colorectal Cancer. Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep 10: 425-430.
  55. Jorda M, Diez-Villanueva A, Mallona I, Martín B, Lois S, et al. (2017) The epigenetic landscape of Alu repeats delineates the structural and functional genomic architecture of colon cancer cells. Genome Res 27: 118-132.
  56. Chalitchagorn K, Shuangshoti S, Hourpai N, Kongruttanachok N, Tangkijvanich P, et al. (2004) Distinctive pattern of LINE-1 methylation level in normal tissues and the association with carcinogenesis. Oncogene 23: 8841-8846.
  57. Bae JM, Shin SH, Kwon HJ, Park SY, Kook MC, et al. (2012) ALU and LINE-1 hypomethylations in multistep gastric carcinogenesis and their prognostic implications. Inter J Cancer 131: 1323-1331.
  58. Kim BH, Cho NY, Shin SH, Kwon HJ, Jang JJ, et al. (2009) CpG island hypermethylation and repetitive DNA hypomethylation in premalignant lesion of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Virchows Arch 455: 343-351.
  59. Lee HS, Kim BH, Cho NY, Yoo EJ, Choi M, et al. (2009) Prognostic Implications of and Relationship Between CpG Island Hypermethylation and Repetitive DNA Hypomethylation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 15: 812-820.
  60. Sunami E, de Maat M, Vu A, Turner RR, Hoon DSB, et al. (2011) LINE-1 hypomethylation during primary colon cancer progression. PLoS One 6: e18884.
  61. van Hoesel AQ, van de Velde CJH, Kuppen PJK (2012) Hypomethylation of LINE-1 in primary tumor has poor prognosis in young breast cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 134: 1103-1114.
  62. Johnson AA, Akman K, Calimport SRG, Wuttke D, Stolzing A, et al. (2012) The role of DNA methylation in aging, rejuvenation, and age-related disease. Rejuvenation Res 15: 483-494.
  63. Hernandez-Blazquez FJ, Habib M, Dumollard JM, Barthelemy C, Benchaib M, et al. (2000) Evaluation of global DNA hypomethylation in human colon cancer tissues by immunohistochemistry and image analysis. Gut 47: 689-693.
  64. Murtaza M, Dawson SJ, Tsui DWY, Gale D, Forshew T, et al. (2013) Non-invasive analysis of acquired resistance to cancer therapy by sequencing of plasma DNA. Nature 497: 108-112.
  65. Lo YM, Corbetta N, Chamberlain PF, Rai V, Sargent IL, et al. (1997) Presence of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum. Lancet 350: 485-487.
  66. Kim HC, Roh SA, Ga IH, Kim JH, Yu CK, et al. (2005) CpG island methylation as an early event during adenoma progression in carcinogenesis of sporadic colorectal cancer. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 20: 1920-1926.
  67. Kohonen-Corish MRJ, Sigglekow ND, Susanto J, Chapuis PH, Bokey EL, et al. (2007) Promoter methylation of the mutated in colorectal cancer gene is a frequent early event in colorectal cancer. Oncogene 26: 4435-4441.
  68. Galamb O, Kalmar A, Peterfia B, Csabai I, Bodor A, et al. (2016) Aberrant DNA methylation of WNT pathway genes in the development and progression of CIMP-negative colorectal cancer. Epigenetics 11: 588-602.
  69. Feinberg AP, Gehrke CW, Kuo KC, Ehrlich M (1988) Reduced genomic 5-methylcytosine content in human colonic neoplasia. Cancer Res 48: 1159-1161.
  70. Goelz SE, Vogelstein B, Hamilton SR, Feinberg AP (1985) Hypomethylation of DNA from benign and malignant human colon neoplasms. Science 228: 187-190.
  71. Bariol C, Suter C, Cheong K, Ku SL, Meagher A, et al. (2003) The relationship between hypomethylation and CpG island methylation in colorectal neoplasia. Am J Pathol 162: 1361-1371.
  72. King WD, Ashbury JE, Taylor SA, Tse MY, Pang SC, et al. (2014) A cross-sectional study of global DNA methylation and risk of colorectal adenoma. BMC Cancer 14.
  73. Cassinotti E, Melson J, Liggett T, Melnikov A, Yi Q, et al. (2012) DNA methylation patterns in blood of patients with colorectal cancer and adenomatous colorectal polyps. Int J Cancer 131: 1153-1157.
  74. deVos T, Tetzner R, Model F, Weiss G, Schuster M, et al. (2009) Circulating Methylated SEPT9 DNA in Plasma Is a Biomarker for Colorectal Cancer. Clin Chem 55: 1337-1346.
  75. Toth K, Galamb O, Spisak S, Wichmann B, Sipos F, et al. (2009) Free circulating DNA based colorectal cancer screening from peripheral blood: the possibility of the methylated septin 9 gene marker. Orv Hetil 150: 969-977.
  76. Lofton-Day C, Model F, Devos T, Tetzner R, Distler J, et al. (2008) DNA methylation biomarkers for blood-based colorectal cancer screening. Clin Chem 54: 414-423.
  77. Molnar B, Toth K, Bartak BK, Tulassay Z (2015) Plasma methylated septin 9: a colorectal cancer screening marker. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 15: 171-184.
  78. Church TR, Wandell M, Lofton-Day C, Mongin SJ, Burger M, et al. (2014) Prospective evaluation of methylated SEPT9 in plasma for detection of asymptomatic colorectal cancer. Gut 63: 317-325.
  79. Tanzer M, Balluff B, Distler J, Hale K, Leodolter A, et al. (2010) Performance of Epigenetic Markers SEPT9 and ALX4 in Plasma for Detection of Colorectal Precancerous Lesions. PLoS One 5: e9061.
  80. Dolat L, Hu Q, Spiliotis ET (2014) Septin functions in organ system physiology and pathology. Biol Chem 395: 123-141.
  81. Grady WM, Rajput A, Lutterbaugh JD, Markowitz SD (2001) Detection of aberrantly methylated hMLH1 promoter DNA in the serum of patients with microsatellite unstable colon cancer. Cancer Res 61: 900-902.
  82. Leung WK, To KF, Man EPS, Chan MWY, Bai AHC, et al. (2005) Quantitative detection of promoter hypermethylation in multiple genes in the serum of patients with colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 100: 2274-2279.
  83. Armaghany T, Wilson JD, Chu Q, Mills G (2012) Genetic alterations in colorectal cancer. Gastrointest Cancer Res 5: 19-27.
  84. Pack SC, Kim HR, Lim SW, Kim HY, Ko JY, et al. (2013) Usefulness of plasma epigenetic changes of five major genes involved in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 28: 139-147.
  85. Becker TM, Rizos H, Kefford RF, Mann GJ (2001) Functional impairment of melanoma-associated p16(INK4a) mutants in melanoma cells despite retention of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 binding. Clin Cancer Res 7: 3282-3288.
  86. Ogino S, Kawasaki T, Kirkner GJ, Kraft P, Loda M, et al. (2007) Evaluation of markers for CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) in colorectal cancer by a large population-based sample. J Mol Diagn 9: 305-314.
  87. Zou HZ, Yu BM, Wang ZW, Sun JY, Cang H, et al. (2002) Detection of aberrant p16 methylation in the serum of colorectal cancer patients. Clinical Cancer Research 8: 188-191.
  88. Nakayama G, Hibi K, Kodera Y, Koike M, Fujiwara M, et al. (2007) p16 methylation in serum as a potential marker for the malignancy of colorectal carcinoma. Anticancer Research 27: 3367-3370.
  89. Lecomte T, Berger A, Zinzindohoue F, Micard S, Landi B, et al. (2002) Detection of free-circulating tumor-associated DNA in plasma of colorectal cancer patients and its association with prognosis. Int J Cancer 100: 542-548.
  90. Nakayama G, Kodera Y, Ohashi N, Koike M, Fujiwara M, et al. (2011) p16(INK4a) Methylation in Serum as a Follow-up Marker for Recurrence of Colorectal Cancer. Anticancer Res 31: 1643-1646.
  91. Ashktorab H, Daremipouran M, Goel A, Varma S, Leavitt R, et al. (2014) DNA methylome profiling identifies novel methylated genes in African American patients with colorectal neoplasia. Epigenetics 9: 503-512.
  92. Nagai Y, Sunami E, Yamamoto Y, Hata K, Okada S, et al. (2017) LINE-1 hypomethylation status of circulating cell-free DNA in plasma as a biomarker for colorectal cancer. Oncotarget 8: 11906-11916.
  93. Hoshimoto S, Kuo CT, Chong KK (2012) AIM1 and LINE-1 Epigenetic Aberrations in Tumor and Serum Relate to Melanoma Progression and Disease Outcome. J Investig Dermatol 132: 1689-1697.
  94. de Maat MF, Umetani N, Sunami E, Turner RR, Hoon DSB, et al. (2007) Assessment of methylation events during colorectal tumor progression by absolute quantitative analysis of methylated alleles. Mol Cancer Res 5: 461-471.
  95. Yamane L, Scapulatempo-Neto C, Reis RM, Guimaraes DP (2014) Serrated pathway in colorectal carcinogenesis. World J Gastroenterol 20: 2634-2640.
  96. Carragher LA, Snell KR, Giblett SM, Aldridge VSS, Patel B, et al. (2010) V600EBraf induces gastrointestinal crypt senescence and promotes tumour progression through enhanced CpG methylation of p16INK4a. EMBO Mol Med 2: 458-471.
  97. Salehi R, Atapour N, Vatandoust N, Farahani N, Ahangari F, et al. (2015) Methylation pattern of ALX4 gene promoter as a potential biomarker for blood-based early detection of colorectal cancer. Adv Biomed Res 4: 252.
  98. Herbst A, Rahmig K, Stieber P, Philipp A, Jung A, et al. (2011) Methylation of NEUROG1 in Serum Is a Sensitive Marker for the Detection of Early Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 106: 1110-1118.
  99. Leong KJ, Wei W, Tannahill LA, Caldwell GM, Jones CE, et al. (2011) Methylation profiling of rectal cancer identifies novel markers of early-stage disease. Br J Surg 98: 724-734.
  100. Bin Lee B, Lee EJ, Jung EH, Chun HK, Chang DK, et al. (2009) Aberrant Methylation of APC, MGMT, RASSF2A, and Wif-1 Genes in Plasma as a Biomarker for Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 15: 6185-6191.
  101. Kolligs FT, Philipp AB, Nagel D, Spelsberg F, Herbst A, et al. (2011) Clinical and prognostic relevance of methylation of circulating HLTF and HPP1 tumor DNA and CEA in serum of patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC). J Clin Oncol 29: 3611.
  102. Oh T, Kim N, Moon Y, Kim MS, Hoehn BD, et al. (2013) Genome-wide identification and validation of a novel methylation biomarker, SDC2, for blood-based detection of colorectal cancer. J Mol Diagn 15: 498-507.
  103. Liu YQ, Tham CK, Ong SYK, Ho KS, Lim JF, et al. (2013) Serum methylation levels of TAC1, SEPT9 and EYA4 as diagnostic markers for early colorectal cancers: a pilot study. Biomarkers 18: 399-405.
  104. Tang D, Liu J, Wang DR, Yu HF, Li YK, et al. (2011) Diagnostic and prognostic value of the methylation status of secreted frizzled-related protein 2 in colorectal cancer. Clin Invest Med 34: E88-95.
  105. Shirahata A, Sakuraba K, Goto T, Saito M, Ishibashi K, et al. (2010) Detection of vimentin (VIM) methylation in the serum of colorectal cancer patients. Anticancer Res 30: 5015-5018.
  106. Hibi K, Goto T, Kitamura YH, Yokomizo K, Sakuraba K, et al. (2010) Methylation of TFPI2 Gene is Frequently Detected in Advanced Well-differentiated Colorectal Cancer. Anticancer Res 30: 1205-1207.
  107. Hibi K, Goto T, Shirahata A, Saito M, Kigawa G, et al. (2011) Detection of TFPI2 methylation in the serum of colorectal cancer patients. Cancer Lett 311: 96-100.
  108. Herbst A, Wallner M, Rahmig K, Stieber P, Crispin A, et al. (2009) Methylation of helicase-like transcription factor in serum of patients with colorectal cancer is an independent predictor of disease recurrence. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 21: 565-569.
  109. Berg M, Nordgaard O, Korner H, Oltedal S, Smaaland R, et al. (2015) Molecular subtypes in stage II-III colon cancer defined by genomic instability: early recurrence-risk associated with a high copy-number variation and loss of RUNX3 and CDKN2A. PLoS One 10: e0122391.
  110. Johnson DA, Barclay RL, Mergener K, Weiss G, König T, et al. (2014) Plasma Septin9 versus fecal immunochemical testing for colorectal cancer screening: a prospective multicenter study. PLoS One 9: e98238.
  111. He Q, Chen HY, Bai EQ, Luo YX, Fu RJ, et al. (2010) Development of a multiplex MethyLight assay for the detection of multigene methylation in human colorectal cancer. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 202: 1-10.
  112. Yu M, Carter KT, Makar KW, Vickers K, Ulrich CM, et al. (2015) MethyLight droplet digital PCR for detection and absolute quantification of infrequently methylated alleles. Epigenetics 10: 803-809.
  113. Wu D, Zhou GP, Jin P, Zhu J, Li S, et al. (2016) Detection of Colorectal Cancer Using a Simplified SEPT9 Gene Methylation Assay Is a Reliable Method for Opportunistic Screening. J Mol Diagn 18: 535-545.
  114. Grutzmann R, Molnar B, Pilarsky C, Habermann JK, Schlag PM, et al. (2008) Sensitive detection of colorectal cancer in peripheral blood by septin 9 DNA methylation assay. PLoS One 3: e3759.
  115. Song LL, Peng XM, Li Y, Xiao W, Jia J, et al. (2017) The SEPT9 gene methylation assay is capable of detecting colorectal adenoma in opportunistic screening. Epigenomics 9: 599-610.
  116. Potter NT, Hurban P, White MN, Whitlock KD, Lofton-Day CE, et al. (2014) Validation of a Real-Time PCR-Based Qualitative Assay for the Detection of Methylated SEPT9 DNA in Human Plasma. Clin Chem 60: 1183-1191.
  117. Pedersen SK, Symonds EL, Baker RT, Murray DH, McEvoy A, et al. (2015) Evaluation of an assay for methylated BCAT1 and IKZF1 in plasma for detection of colorectal neoplasia. BMC Cancer 15: 654.
  118. Symonds EL, Pedersen SK, Baker RT, Murray DH, Gaur S, et al. (2016) A Blood Test for Methylated BCAT1 and IKZF1 vs. a Fecal Immunochemical Test for Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 7: e137.
  119. Ebert MPA, Model F, Mooney S, Hale K, Lograsso J, et al. (2006) Aristaless-like homeobox-4 gene methylation is a potential marker for colorectal adenocarcinomas. Gastroenterology 131: 1418-1430.
  120. Rasmussen SL, Krarup HB, Sunesen KG, Johansen MB, Stender MT, et al. (2017) Hypermethylated DNA, a circulating biomarker for colorectal cancer detection. PLoS One 12: e0180809.
  121. Li M, Chen WD, Papadopoulos N, Goodman SN, Bjerregaard NC, et al. (2009) Sensitive digital quantification of DNA methylation in clinical samples. Nat Biotechnol 27: 858-863.
  122. Shirahata A, Hibi K (2014) Serum Vimentin Methylation as a Potential Marker for Colorectal Cancer. Anticancer Res 34: 4121-4125.
  123. Wallner M, Herbst A, Behrens A, Crispin A, Stieber P, et al. (2006) Methylation of serum DNA is an independent prognostic marker in colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 12: 7347-7352.
  124. Nakayama G, Hibi K, Nakayama H, Kodera Y, Ito K, et al. (2007) A highly sensitive method for the detection of p16 methylation in the serum of colorectal cancer patients. Anticancer Res 27: 1459-1463.
Citation: Dong L, Ren H (2018) Blood-based DNA Methylation Biomarkers for Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer. J Proteomics Bioinform 11:120-126.

Copyright: © 2018 Dong L, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top