Medicinal & Aromatic Plants

Medicinal & Aromatic Plants
Open Access

ISSN: 2167-0412

+44 1300 500008

Research Article - (2016) Volume 5, Issue 4

Characterization and Identification of the Components Extracted from 28 Lichens in Tunisia by High Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography (HPTLC), Morphologic Determination of the Species and Study of the Antibiotic Effects of Usnic Acid

Karima Tabbabi* and Tijani Karmous
Laboratory of Natural Substances, Faculty of Sciences of Bizerte, University of Carthage, Bizerte, Tunisia
*Corresponding Author: Karima Tabbabi, Laboratory of Natural Substances, Faculty of Sciences of Bizerte, University of Carthage, Zarzouna 7021, Bizerte, Tunisia, Tel: 0021652800776 Email:

Abstract

This aim of this work is to study the isolation of usnic acid found in many lichen species and the evaluation of its antibacterial activity. The study began with a morphological determination of lichens harvested in Tunisia. The corresponding analysis identified 28 species belonging to the following families: Xanthoria, Parmelia, Caloplaca, Ramalina, Diploschistes, Usnea. A chromatographic study of the chemical composition of these lichens highlighted the presence of many compounds belonging to various chemical categories: depsides and depsidones, xanthones, anthraquinones, dibenzofurans, etc. Special attention was given to the components of this last category and particularly to usnic acid which is therapeutically very interesting. This component plays a very important role in fighting the bacteria responsible for numerous urinary and pulmonary infections and also in fighting viruses responsible for certain tumors. Antibacterial activity tests showed that the Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococci strains have certain sensitivity to usnic acid extracted from the Usnea hirta lichen. Given that various fields, and especially medicine, are currently showing considerable interest in vegetable extracts, this study will be continued in the future with the aim to isolate other components with efficient therapeutic effects.

Keywords: Lichen; Usnea; Chromatographic analysis; Chemical composition; Usnic acid; Antibacterial activities

Introduction

The diversity of the geographical and climatic conditions of Tunisia favors the development of a flora rich in aromatic and medicinal plants. The use of these plants attracts much attention especially given the increasing interest of many sectors such as the cosmetic and food [1-3] industries, and herbal medicine [2,4,5]. These industries are keen to incorporate natural compounds considered non-polluting and harmless in their formulations.

The exploitation of this natural wealth essentially involves the isolation of bioactive compounds such as alkaloids, flavors, essences, essential oils, etc. [6,7].

In order to contribute to the promotion of medicinal and aromatic plants a physico-chemical and morphological study was performed of a poorly-exploited but abundant plant species: lichens. This plant results from a symbiotic association between fungi and algae and grows on various media: soil, rocks, tree barks, etc. [8]. The lichen constituents are astonishing for many reasons. Some of them provide highly-soughtafter fragrances [9,10] while others are very effective as antibiotic drugs [2,7]. Others are the main food of reindeer in Scandinavia.

In addition to their dyeing properties [11-13], all lichens are pollution indicators [14-17] which is sometimes the reason that prevents them from surviving.

This study focuses on Tunisia lichens which contain active principles. These are characterized by a dibenzofuran structure. Usnic acid is the most widely known bioactive compound [18-21] and so will be isolated in order to peRform an antibacterial activity test.

Tunisia has a batch of 395 lichens. Many works predict the existence of other species not yet detected in southern Tunisia. The appearance of this flora is essentially Mediterranean and most lichens belong to the squamulose and fruticose families [22-26].

Hundreds of samples were collected and most were subjected to morphological and chemical analyses through specific and chromatographic tests. Lichens rich in usnic acid were studied. The latter was isolated and a study of its antibacterial effect was conducted.

Usnic acid has been recognized as having significant activity against bacteria which are the cause of many ailments. It is characterized by its activity against Streptococcus mutans [27] responsible for dental lesions; against Staphylococcus aureus [28,29] which secretes toxins and enzymes that cause necrosis states and sepsis and Trichomonas vaginalis [30] that causes urinary tract infections.

We believe it is important to focus on the morphology of lichens since it is decisive in the identification of lichen substances [22]. Throughout the study, the specific terms relating to the botanical description of lichens are given extra importance given that they play a role in the understanding of the morphological study [23]. The nature and component structures characterizing the lichens are also mentioned due to their utility in the interpretation of results.

Materials and Methods

The lichen material

The lichens used in this study were collected from different regions around Tunisia; the north of the country: Sejnane, Nefza, Djebel Ichkeul, Hammam-Lif, Ras Jebel, Al Alia; the central region: Makthar, Siliana and Zaghouan; and the south: Gabes, Mareth.

The lichens corresponding to these samples are fixed on various media: soil and rocks (limestone, granite, etc.), shrubs (Rosemary, retama, etc.) and trees (Fig tree, olive, eucalyptus, Aleppo pine, carob tree, etc.).

The morphological identification of the lichens collected required a microscopic examination of the fragments or the apothecial sections. Certain thallus characteristics led to similar observations, especially when looking for the cellular cortex.

Analytical methods

Morphological analysis: In order to determine the different species, a microscopic examination of the fragments or the apothecial sections was required. These were mounted between the microscope cover slip and the slide [8]. In any morphologic characterization, the observation of the cellular cortex, the number, color and shape of the spores per ascus are the features of interest.

In order to examine the sections, a Carl Zeiss Jena microscope Med 2, which can perform magnifications of up to x 1000, was used. To observe the whole thallus, a Bruogg WLDM3 camera with a magnification power of up to 160 x was used.

Color tests: Color reactions occur during the determination of lichen species and when identifying lichen substances. These reactions can be observed by the naked eye and involve various tests, with each test using a suitable reagent.

These tests call for the following reactants:

–– Test C employs a saturated aqueous solution of calcium hypochlorite Ca (OCl2)2 or sodium NaOCl

–– Test K employs a potassium hydroxide KOH aqueous solution of about 10%

–– Test PD uses a paraphenylenediamine ethanoic solution of between 1 and 5%

–– Test KC uses the reagents of tests C and K applied successively.

The reagent for each test is either applied using a micropipette onto the lichen thalli studied or sprayed onto chromatographic plates developed to reveal the eluted lichen substances.

The appearance of color immediately after the execution of a test indicates the suitability of said test and is noted as K+, C+, PD+, KC+ depending on the reagent used, otherwise it is noted as K-, C-, PD-, KC-.

Analysis by high performance thin-layer chromatography: The best method for the identification of lichen substances is the thin-layer chromatography (TLC) described by Culberson and Kristensson [24] (a standardized technique which later underwent certain modifications). It involves the use of three solvent systems, silica plates ready for use and two control substances (atranorin and norstictic acid). The control substances are chromatographed simultaneously with the studied lichen extract.

High performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) [25], which can be used to study lichen substances [26], is used in this study. This technique has several advantages over TLC: a faster elution, it is more sensitive, a smaller amount of solvent is required and there is the possibility to elute double the number of samples [27].

This method was applied while using the experimental conditions recommended by Culberson and Ammann [28] for TLC, namely three solvent systems and two control substances.

Each substance is identified by its retention index (Rf) in three respective eluents. For every eluent, the comparison of the sample Rf with those of the controls allows to define the Rf class for the corresponding eluent.

The characterization of the classes is as follows: the starting line defines class 1; the displacements of the norstictic acid (N) and atranorin (A) determine classes 4 and 7 respectively. The distances between these classes, divided into two, yield two new classes: 2 and 3 between 1 and 4; and 5 and 6 between 4 and 7. Beyond class 7, class 8 is found which reaches up to the front of the eluent.

Thus, a class is assigned for each lichen compound chromatographed in each of the three elution systems. These attributions are also based on comparisons made with reference control samples extracted from specific lichens such as usnic acid extracted from Usnea barbata, lecanoric acid from Parmelia glabratula, etc. as well as the two controls recommended by the method described by Culberson et al.

Aliphatic acids are revealed by their thickness which makes spotting them easy through the appearance of big marks at the bottom of the plate, moistened with water, just after their development. Identification is achieved by comparing their Rf parameters with those of the reference products extracted with acetone from specific lichens, each containing a known aliphatic acid: caperatic acid in Plastimatia glauca, rangiformic acid in Cladonia rangiformis, bourgeanic acid in Cladonia conista and roccellic acid in Roccella tinctoria.

Other parameters intervene in the identification of an analyzed substance, such as its color, its fluorescence under UV before and after revelation, the results of the coloring tests with potassium hydroxide (test K), bleach (test C), and the two previous reactants applied successively (test KC), paraphenylenediamine (test PD) as well as the evolution of color with time [29].

According to these data, tables proposed by Culberson and Kristensson [24], Culberson [26], Culberson [30], White and James [31] allow to select a number of identification possibilities for the substance being considered.

The samples were prepared, processed and chromatographed according to the description given in the following preparation section:

Extraction of lichen substances: A minimum volume of (0.4 ml) of acetone (Merck for analyses) was added to 70 mg of dry lichen, corresponding to approximately a surface of 1 cm2.

Control substances: the norstictic acid and atranorine contained respectively in lichens Parmelia acetabulum and Plastismatia glauca. These lichens each contain a single unique major component.

Reference controls: Reference products extracted with acetone from specific lichens each containing a known lichen substance: erythrin in Dirina stenhammari, fumarprotocetraric acid in Cladonia coniocracea, protocetraric acid in Ramalina farinacea, glomelliferic acid in Parmelia loxodes, salazinic acid in Parmelia reticulata, lecanoric acid in Parmelia glabratula, gyrophoric acid in Ochrolechia androgyna, psoromic acid in Schismatomma niveum, arthothelin in Ochrolechia inversa, divaricatic acid in Haematomma ventosum, stenosporic acid in Ramalina stenespora, diploïcin in Buellia canescens, usnic acid in Usnea barbata, parietin in Caloplaca ferruginea, gangaleoïdin in Lecanora ganglaeoïdes, zeorin in Cladonia coccifera, 2-o-diméthylpsoromic acid in Scherophyton circumscriptum, granulosin in Buellia granulosa, 4,5-dichloronorlichexanthon in Lecanora straminea and chloroatranorin in Parmelia physodes.

Chromatographic plates: Silica gel plates 60 F over 20 × 10 cm (Merck) glass dried at 50° C for 5 min just before development. These plates differ from those used in TLC in the thickness of the adsorbent (0.20 mm instead of 0.22 mm) and the particle size of the silica gel (4 to 8 microns).

Deposit: deposits of analytes, spaced 5 mm from each other, formed 5 mm from the two edges along the length of the plate.

Three-solvent system:

A: Toluene-dioxane- ethanoic acid (18/06/0.8 by vol).

B: n-hexane-diethylether- methanoic acid (13/10/2 ml by vol).

C: Toluene- ethanoic acid (20/3 by vol).

10 ml were used for conditioning the plate and 4 ml for its development.

Developing chamber: Development was performed in a horizontal developing chamber (Camag) for HPTLC.

Elution: before eluting, the plate was placed in the developing chamber and saturated in the corresponding solvent vapors for 5 minutes. During migration, the solvent moved in the opposite direction starting from the edges. The elution was stopped when the two fronts met.

Revelation: three revelations were applied [32]:

- The examination of the plates before and after development was carried out under visible light and under UV light (λ=360 nm) of the Camag lamp.

- The impregnation of the plates with 10% sulfuric acid followed by heating at 100-110°C for 10 min allows to specifically stain the separated marks.

- Visualization by spraying the color test reagents.

The aliphatic acids were identified by their bold type immediately after their elution without any revelation; this led to their disappearance.

Extraction and analysis of usnic acid

Species containing usnic acid: The study of lichens collected by high-performance thin-layer chromatography identified usnic acid along with other components in the following 8 lichens: Cetraria aurescens (L5), Cladonia foliacea (L6), Evernia divaricata (L12), Lecanora muralis (L13), Lecanora campestris (L14), Parmelia caperata (L19), Parmelia somlesciens (L21), Squamarina cartilaginea (L26). The chromatographic analyses confirmed the presence of usnic acid as the single component in Usnea hirta (L25). This species is used to extract usnic acid to be used in the study of antibacterial activity (Figures 1 and 2).

medicinal-aromatic-plants-usnic-acid

Figure 1: Usnic acid

medicinal-aromatic-plants-iR-spectrum

Figure 2: IR spectrum of usnic acid.

Extraction of usnic acid: A Soxhlet apparatus was used for the extraction of usnic acid by solvent from lichens rich in this therapeutic principle. Usnea hirta (L25) fragments were collected and dried in air. 100 g of this lichen were heat-treated with 150 ml of hexane in a Soxhlet apparatus. The extraction time was 6 h and slurping was done every 10 minutes. The mixture collected was concentrated under vacuum and the residue was subjected to purification on a chromatographic column filled with silica gel. The elution used the chloroform -n- hexane solvent system (80/100 by volume). At the end of this process, an amount of 930 mg of usnic acid was obtained with a yield of 0.93%.

Study of usnic acid antibacterial activity: The laboratory of the Bizerte Regional Hospital helped in the study of the antibacterial activity of usnic acid on bacteria responsible for the infectious state of some patients.

The in vitro evaluation of the antibacterial activity was performed using the liquid medium dilution technique. The method involves the preparation of a series of usnic acid solutions with decreasing concentrations from a stock solution having a concentration of 5 mg/ ml. The same amount (2 ml) of bacterial suspension was added to each solution containing germs whose behavior towards the usnic acid was to be studied.

The mixtures thus prepared were incubated at a suitable temperature (37°C) for 24 h. Once incubation was complete the solutions were inspected with the naked eye. Solutions with disorders corresponded to the non-inhibition of the strain with usnic acid. The first tube of the prepared series, where no disorder was observed, would provide the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC).

Results and Discussion

Morphology

The Xanthoria parietina species (L27) was identified and which is dominant lichen in the Mediterranean climate and highly resistant to pollutants (fluorine, lead, etc.). It is extracted in areas located along the coast (Tunis, Cap Bon, Sahel, etc.) and inland (Kef, Makthar, etc.). Growing on various supports, (soil, tiles, trees, stone) it belongs to the foliose family. The thallus has a circular shape, limits which are slightly detached and an orientation-dependent color. Sunshine promotes orangey-green lichens while grayish-green lichens are favored by shade.

This lichen is characterized by its color reaction K + purple-red and for being rich in parietin. The morphological results also showed the Parmelia (Parmelia cetrata L18, Parmelia caperata L19, Parmelia pulla L20, Parmelia somlasciens L21) and Ramalina (Ramalina lacera L23) families, foliose and fruticose lichens respectively, widespread in regions where rainfall is abundant (Sejnane, Djebel Ichkeul). Almost all of these lichens are arboreal but calcifuges.

The Parmelia can develop usnic acid accompanied with other substances belonging to the depside, depsidone and anthraquinone classes. The divaricatic acid is the main substance of Ramalina.

Most Cladonia (Cladonia foliacea L6, Cladonia rangiformis L7, Cladonia cartilaginea L8) lichens identified were squamulose. This species is ubiquitous in Tunisia. These lichens are mostly soilborne and calcifuges [8], growing on tree trunks. Many substances developed by the Cladonia play an important role in the determination of species because of the color reactions which they give rise to. The Cladonia can develop usnic acid whose presence depends on the medium (support, sunshine, humidity, etc.). The morphological study led to the identification of two groups of very wide-spread crustaceous lichens in regions of high humidity (littoral, north). The first group is represented by Diploïcia L9, Lecanora L13, L14 and Lecidella L16, all growing exclusively on trees. Diploschistes L10 and Caloplaca (Calplaca saxicola L2), occurring in soil and rocks, form the second group. These crustacean lichens can develop substances belonging to different chemical families: parietin, atranorin, etc.

It must be noted that during this characterization, lichen belonging to the Usnea genus was found. This was Usnea hirta (L25) collected in the Sahel area. This terricolous lichen is rich in usnic acid. Confirmation of this hypothesis was provided by a chromatographic analysis. Results are presented in the Table 1.

Lichen ref Species of lichen Support Places of sampling Description and characteristics of the species
L2 Caloplaca aurantia Limestone Djebel Ichkeul - Lichen orange-red around the edges characterized by whitish parts
- Owns numerous apothecia orange color
- Lichen nitrophile
L6 Cladonia foliacea Ground Sejnane -Squamulose lichenpushing especially on medium not limestone or limestone little
-White thallus, xerophile non orophile - Always as on floor mats
L7 Cladonia rangiformis Ground -Nefza
-Boukornine
- Lichen soil-borne, small thallus -Has green-gray color podetions length 2 to 12 cm -Podetions branched, rigid and brittle
L8 Cladonia cartilaginea - Ground -Soft rocks -Trees Boukornine -Lichen squamulose or foliacea -Has long podetions of several cm -Granular thallus, cracked, sometimes mealy -Apothecia rare, yellowish or pink scarlet red, single-celled spores -Lichen usually calcifuge, and soil-borne humicole
L9 Diploïcia canescens Cork Sejnane - Lichen crustacean, sometimes blue-gray whitish gray, lobbed the periphery - Apothecia thin edge - Lichen nitrophile, saxicole, lignicolous or corticolous
L10 Diploschistes gypsaseus Ground Sahel(Zarmdine) - White lichen thallus, floury appearance - Apothecia not embedded in the thallus, with black discs and thallin thick edge
L13 Lecanora muralis Rock Kef - bright green crustacean lichen thallus, markedly lobed on the outskirts, fendrilled-aeroled - Attached directly to the support, owns numerous greenish-brown color apothecia - Nitrophile lichen growing on the most diverse substrates
L14 Lecanora campestris Eucalyptus Sejnane - Lichen crustacean non lobbed the periphery light gray - Thallus with brown apothecium with clear edge -Corticolous lichen
L16 Lecidella Carpathica Ground Sejnane - White lichen thallus sometimes greenish, granular, cracked - Flat or slightly convex apothecia, evergreen edge -Thallus C-, calcifuge, nitrophile
L19 Parmelia caperata Cork Sejnane - Foliose lichen growing on the trunks, branches and old trees but rarely on rocks and soils -Greenish thallus shaped rosette, strong adhesion to the substrate -Lichen photophile, very sensitive to pollution
L20 Parmelia pulla Rock Sejnane -Foliose Lichen thallus brown or greenish brown, strong adhesion to the substrate - Apothecia always present with flat or concave disk same color to thallus
L21 Parmelia somlesciens Rock Boukornine -Foliose greenish lichen, non calcicole, just stick to the substrate, elongated or not lobes -Very common lichen
L23 Ramalina lacera Cork Sejnane -Fruticose lichen thalloid drawn shaped strips of 1 to 10 cm high, highly branched green-whitish - Growing on bark, in wood, non-limestone in very humid environments
L25 Usnea hirta
Treetrunks
Djebel Ichkeul -Thallus of a clear or yellowish green, very narrowed at base - loose medulla K-, C-, PD- - Soralies abundant on terminal branches

Table 1: Results of the morphological determination of harvested lichens.

High-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC)

The analysis of Tunisian lichens by HPTLC using similar conditions to those for the TLC method recommended by Culberson and Ammann [31] led to the results shown in Table 2.

Ref Lichen species No. of identified pigments Rf’/RfN’/RfA’ Rf Class Color of the task after revelation UV(λ)=360 nm Color test Nature and class of pigments identified
      A B C A B C   Before revelation After revelation   Nature Class
L1 Caloplaca aurantia 1 39/25,38 30/19,31 30/13,28 7 6-7 7-8 Yellow Orange Orange K+red Parietin e
L2 Caloplaca saxicola 4 30/25,38
39/25,38
34/25,38 32/25,38
25/19,31
30/19,31
27/19,31 23/19,31
17/13,28
30/13,28
16/13,28 25/13,28
5
7
6 6
5-6
6-7
6 5
5
7-8
5 6
Yellow
Yellow
Orange
red
Orange
Yellow
Red
Red
Orange
Yellow
Orange
Red
Orange
K+ red
K+ red
K+ red
K+red
Emodin
Parietin
Faccinal Teloschistine
e
e
e
e
L3 Acarospora schle?cheri 1 33/24,37 23/18,30 20/12,27 6 5 6-5 Yellowlemon Darkred Brown _ Rhizocarpic
acid
j
L4 Aspicilia calcerea 1 2/24,37 2/18,30 1/12,27 1-2 1-2 1 Yellow _ Dark green C+red Erythrine a
L5 Cetraria aurescens 2 35/24,37 6/24,37 30/18,30 13/18,30 26/12,27 3/12,27 6-7 2 6-7 3 6-7 2 Gray-gren _ Dark _ Olive _ KC+yellow K+yellow UsnicAcid
CaperaticAcid
f
h
L6 Cladonia foliacea 2 3/24,37
35 /24,37
16/18,30
30/18,30
3/12,27
26 /12,27
2
6-7
3
6-7
2
6-7
Gray
Gray green
Colorless
Derk
colorless
Olive
PD+red
KC+yellow
Fumarprotocetraric acid
Usnicacid
d
f
L7 Cladonia rangiformis 3 4/25,39 3/25,39
39/25,39
16/20,31 14/20,31
31/20,31
4/13,28 5/13,28
28/13,28
2 1-2
7
3
3
7
2
2
7
Gray Fat
Yellow orange
Colorless
_
dark
Colorless
_
Brown
PD+red
_
K+yellow
Fumarprotocetraric acid
Rangiformic acid
Atranorin
d h
c
L8 Cladonia cartilaginea 1 4/25,39 16/20,31 4/13,28 2 3 2 Gray Colorless Colorless PD+red Fumarprotocetraric acid d
L9 Diploïcia canescens 3 30/25,39
39/25,39
39/25,39
27/20,31
31/20,31
31/20,31
24/13,28
28/13,28
30/13,28
6
7
7
6
7
7
6
7
7-8
Fat
Yellow orange
Yellow
Colorless
Dark
Colorless
Colorless
Brown
Orange
_
K+yellow
PD+ orange
Diploïcine
Atranorin
Chloroatranorin
b
c
c
L10 Diploschistes gypsaceus 1 11/24,38 22/19,31 10/13,28 3 5 3 Gray(A), yellow (B, C) Colorless Dark green C+red Lecanoric acide a
L11 Fulgensia fulgida 1 38/24,38 30/19,31 30/13,28 7 6-7 7-8 Gray-green yellow Orange Orange K+red Parietin e
L12 Evernia divaricata 3 25/24,38
36/24,38
23/24,38
29/19,31
30/19,31
26/19,31
25/13,28
38/13,28
15/13,28
5
6-7
3-4
6-7
6-7
6
6
6-7
5
Orange
Gray green
Yellow
Gray
dark
_
Gray
Olive
Green
C+red
KC+yellow
_
Divaricatic acid
Usnic acid
Evernic acid
a
f
a
L13 Lecanora muralis 6 3/24,37 23/24,37
24/24,37
29/24,37
35/24,37
37/24,37
16/18,31 19/18,31
25/18,31
22/18,31
30/18,31
31/18,31
3/13,27 11/13,27
20/13,27
20/13,27
26/13,27
27/13,27
2 3-4
4
5
6-7
7
3 4-5
5
5
6-7
7
2 4-5
5-6
5-6
6-7
7
Gray Fat
Fat-brown
Fat-gray
Fat-gray green
Fat-yellow orange
_
_
Blue-gray
_
Dark
Dark
Violet
_
Brown
Pink
Olive
Brown
PD+ red
_
PD+orange
PD+ red
KC+ yellow
K+yellow
fumarprotocétraric acid
murolic acid
psoromic acid
Zéorine
Usnicacid
Atranorin
d
h
d
i
f
c
L14 Lecanora campestris 3 29/24,37
35/24,37
37/24,37
22/18,31
30/18,31
31/18,31
20/13,27
26/13,27
27/13,27
5
6-7
7
5
6-7
7
5-6
6-7
7
Gray
Gray green
Yellow orange
_
Dark
Dark
Pink
Olive
Brown
PD+ red
KC+yellow
K+ yellow
Zéorine
Usnicacid
Atranorin
i
f
c
L15 Lecidella elaeochroma 3 21/24,38
25/24,38
37/24,38
18/19,31
19/19,31
30/19,31
11/13,28
14/13,28
25/13,28
3
4
7
4
4
6-7
3
4-5
6
_
Orange brown
colorless
Orange
Red
Orange
Orange
Red brown
Red brown
_
C+ orange
_
4,5-dichloronorlichéxanthone
Arthothelin
Granulosin
g
g
g
L16 Lecidella carpathica 3 30/24,38
38/24,38
38/24,38
27/19,31
31/19,31
31/19,31
24/13,28
30/13,28
28/13,28
6
7
7
6
7
7
6
7-8
7
Fat
Yellow
Yellow orange
colorless
colorless
Dark
_
Orange
Brown
_
PD+orange
K+yellow
Diploïcin
Chloroatranorin
Atranorin
b
c
c
L17 Lobaria pulmonaria 2 18/24,38
25/24,38
20/19,31
19/19,31
10/13,28
13/13,28
3
4
4-5
4
3
4
Yellow
Yellow
_
_
Green
Purple
C+red
K+red
Gyrophoricacid
Norsticticacid
a
a
L18 Parmelia cetrata 2 9/25,38 38/25,38 7/19,32 32/19,32 2/13,28 28/13,28 2 7 2 7 2 7 Orange bright
yellow-orange
Colorless Dark   Orange Brown K+ orange
K+yellow
Salazinic acid
Atranorin
d
c
L19 Parmelia caperata 4 6/25,38
2/25,38
36/25,38
38/25,38
13/19,32
12/19,32
31/19,32
32/19,32
3/13,28
2/13,28
26/13,28
28/13,28
2
1
6-7
7
3
3
6-7
7
2
2
6-7
7
fat
Dark gray
Gray-green
Yellow orange
_
_
Dark
Dark
_
Purple
Olive
Brown
K+yellow
PD+orange
KC+yellow
_
Caperatic acid
Protocetraric acid
Usnic acid
Atranorin
h
d
f
e
L20 Parmelia pulla 4 18/24,38
26/24,38
25/24,38
23/25,38
20/19,31
23/19,31
30/19,31
23/19,31
10/13,27
22/13,27
26/13,27
26/13,27
3
4-5
5
5
4-5
5-6
6-7
6-7
3
6
6
6
yellow
Pale yellow Orange
Yellow
_
Light blue
Gray
_
green
Bleu purple
Gray
Purple
C+red
C+red
C+red
C+red
Gyrophoric acid
glomelliferic acid
divaricatic acid
stenosporic acid
a
a
a
a
L21 Parmelia somlesciens 4 9/24,38 25/24,38
36/24,38
33/24,38
7/19,31 19/19,31
28/19,31
31/19,31
1/13,27 13/13,27
25/13,27
27/13,27
2 4
6-7
7
2 4
6-7
7
1-2 4
6-7
7
Bright orange
Bright yellow
Gray green
Yellow orange
_ _
Dark
Dark
Orange Purple
Olive
Brown
K+red
K+red
K+yellow
K+yellow
Salazinic acid
Norstictic acid
usnic acid
Atranorin
d
d
f
c
L22 Pertusaria flavida 2 18/24,38 33/24,38 6/19,31 27/19,31 9/13,27 25/13,27 3
6
2
6
3
6
Orange Pale orange _
Red orange
Orange Brown PD+orange
K+yellow
C+orange
Stictic acid
Thiophanic acid
c
g
L23 Ramalina lacera 2 32/24,37
25/24,37
27/18,31
30/18,31
20/13,27
23/13,27
5-6
4-5
6
6-7
5-6
6
_
Orange
_
Gray
_
Gray
_
C+red
Bourgeanique acid
Divaricatic acid
h
a
L24 Roccella tinctoria 2 2/24,37
11/24,37
2/18,31
21/18,31
1/13,27
9/13,27
1-2
3
1-2
5
1
3
Yellow
Gray(A), yellow (B, C)
_
_
Dark green
Dark green
C+red
C+red
Erythrin
Lecanoric acid
a
a
L25 Usnea hirta 1 34/24,37 30/18,31 27/13,27 6-7 6-7 6-7 Gray-green Dark Olive KC+yellow Usnic acid f
L26 Squamarina cartilaginea 3 17/24,37 24/24,37
35/24,37
18/18,31 22/18,31
30/18,31
7/13,27 18/13,27
27/13,27
3 4
6-7
4 5
6-7
2 5
6-7
Brown Darkbrown Gris-Green Colorless Gray-blue
dark
Yellowbrown Brun
Olive
_
PD+red
KC+yellow
Acide 2-O-diméthylpsoromique
Psoromic acid
Usnic acid
d
d
f
L27 Xanthoria parietina 1 31/24,37 28/18,31 32/13,27 7 6-7 7-8 Yellow Orange Orange K+red Parietin e
L28 Psora decipiens 0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
*: Rf’=Rfx100, RfN’=RfNx100, RfA’=RfAx100 are the respective pretensions of the factors studied pigment and witnesses (norstictic acid and atranorin).
**: Elution solvents: A=Toluene-dioxane-acetic acid (180/60/8), B=n-Hexane-ethyl ether - formic acid (130/100/20), C=Toluene- acetic acide (200/30).
***: Color tests: K (Potasse), C (Hypochlorite), PD (Paraphenylenediamine).
****: Chemical class of the pigment: a=Depside α-orsellic, b=Depsidone α-orsellic, c=Depside β-orsellic, d=Depsidone β-orsellic, e=Anthraquinone, f=Dibenzofurane,
g=Xanthone, h=Aliphatic acid, i=Triterpene.

Table 2: Results of the characterization and identification of the components extracted from 28 lichens in Tunisia by high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC).

The analysis of each lichen studied by HPTLC consisted in carrying out a comparison of Rf obtained by the three elution systems with control chromatographic data atranorin and norstictic acid. Moreover, the allocation was based on the results of the action of the various indicators used (UV, H2SO4, potassium hydroxide, hypochlorite, etc.) and on the values of the retention indices indications measured compared with those of the reference products.

For all the species chromatographed, the isolated lichen substances were thirty two. They belong to the following chemical classes:

- Xanthones represented by arthothelin, granulosine, 4,5-dichloronorlichexanthone and thiophanic acid. These substances are present in Lecidella elaeochroma (L15) and Pertusaria flavida (L22). Xanthones are yellow dyeing substances.

- Anthraquinone derivatives such as parietin seen in Xanthoria parietina (L27), Fulgencia fulgida (L15) and Caloplaca aurantia (L1). The parietin is a dye which is distinguished by its resistance to washing and light.

- The depsides (atranorin, erythrin, lecanoric acid, divaricatic, stenosporic and gyrophoric acids…) and the depsidones (salazinic, psoromic, protocetraric, fumarprotocetraric acids…) were detected in lichens L7, L9, L12, L13, L17, L20, L21, L22. The depsides and depsidones are known for their dyeing power.

- Dibenzofuran derivatives were represented in lichens L5, L6, L12, L13, L14, L19, L21 and L25 by usnic acid which has antibiotic properties.

The 28 species concerned differ in their composition in lichen substances except the Xanthoria parietina (L27), Fulgensia fulgida (L11) and Caloplaca aurantia species containing the same component, namely parietin. Other species also contain a single lichen component: rhizocarpic acid in Acarospora Schleïcheri (L3), erythrine in Acarospora Schleïcheri (L4) and usnic acid in Usnea hirta (L25). No lichen substance is identified in Psora decipiens (L28).

In the studied lichen, other components were identified; these components were fatty acids (caperatic, murolic, rangiformic, bourgeanic acids, etc.) and a triterpene (zeorine). Usnic acid was the only component of Usnea hirta . This lichen served as support to extract the usnic acid.

Isolation and characterization of usnic acid extracted from the Usnea hirta lichen

Several analytical methods have been used to identify the purified extracts obtained from the Usnea hirta lichen. Note that the molecule of usnic acid has the following structure:

Analysis by infrared spectroscopy: From the IR spectrum of the purified compound, the allocation of the strips collected were characterized by the following vibrations: 3433 cm-1OH, 1683 cm-1(C=O)Ar, 1600, and 1533 cm-1(C=C)Ar, 1300-1283 cm-1(C-O-C), a series of bands between 3083 and 2916 cm-1(C-H)Ar et ν(C-H)Aliph. These vibrations and their wave numbers are similar to those reported in the literature [33] for usnic acid. All these data confirm that the isolated and purified sample is indeed usnic acid.

Analysis by ultraviolet spectroscopy: The extract of Usnea hirta provided a UV-visible spectrum with two bands of neighboring intensities. The first band was found at λmax=230 nm and the second wavelength at λmax=280 nm. This is probably a π → π* transition of the conjugated system. The band at λ=280 nm can be explained by the strong combination of the system given its strong molar absorption coefficient ε. This band can only correspond to a π → π* transition because if this were an n → π* transition, a much lower ε less than or equal to 50 would be obtained. Comparing the results to bibliographic data [34], the UV spectrum of usnic acid has two bands at wavelengths λmax=230.9 nm and λmax=280.3 nm respectively. The similarity of the two spectra represents a first argument supporting that the sample under study must be usnic acid.

Results of the usnic acid antibacterial activity study extracted from Usnea lichens

The results of the antibacterial activity tests showed that the Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Enterococcus faecalis strains are very sensitive to the gentamicine antibiotic (40 mg/ ml) at dilutions of 1/256. The inhibition zones ranging from 25 to 48 mm prove the high antibacterial activity of the drug used as reference.

The tests revealed that bactericidal concentrations of usnic acid extracted from the Usnea hirta lichen are 1/64 for Staphylococcus aureus, 1/32 for E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae and 1/8 for Enterococcus faecalis. Thus, the sensitivities differ from one bacterium to another.

The inhibition zones ranged from 12 to 24 mm for Staphylococcus aureus, 10 to 14 mm for E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. A low sensitivity was assigned to the Enterococcus faecalis since its zones of inhibition ranged from 3 to 7 mm.

The effect of concentration was not well proven given that the inhibition zone does not provide an increasing diameter depending on the usnic acid content. This preliminary study should also be performed on other bacterial strains.

Conclusion

In this work, lichens having the ability to develop some components with significant therapeutic effects have been studied. A morphological identification of the lichens collected from various regions of Tunisia was first made since the chemical composition varies with the plant species. This determination identified some lichen species: Parmelia, Crustaceans, Cladonia, Diploschistes, etc.

The chromatographic analysis revealed the existence of various compounds in these species belonging to the following chemical classes: xanthones, anthraquinones and dibenzofurans. This identification confirmed the presence of usnic acid mainly in Usnea hirta, a dibenzofuranic component that can have therapeutic effects. The study of the antibacterial activity revealed that three strains showed sensitivity to usnic acid. These were Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumonaea. This result prompted us to resume the tests of this study to determine the parameters that affect the bacterial activity.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the team of the Bacteriology Laboratory of the Bizerte Regional Hospital for their help during this study.

References

  1. Brightman FH (1960) Antibiotics from lichens. Biol. Hum. Affairs, 26: 1-5.
  2. Richardson DHS, Young CM, Seaward MRD (1977) Lichens and vertebrates in lichens ecology. In: A Centuray of Mycology. Ed Academic Press, London, Pp: 121-144.
  3. Moriano FC, Divakar PK, Crespo A, Gómez-Serranillos MP (2015) Neutroprotective activity and cytotoxicpotential of two Parmeliacea lichens: Identification of active compounds. Phytomedicine 22: 847-855.
  4. Komaty S, Letertre M, Dang HD, Jungnickel H, Laux P, et al. (2016) Sample preparation for an optimized extraction of localized metabolites in lichens: Application to Pseudevernia furfuracea Talanta, 150: 525-530.
  5. Ramaut JL (1965) Réflexions sur la valeur chimiotaxonomique des substances lichéniques à basses concentrations : le cas de l’ acide usnique chez Evernia Prunastri (L.). Ach Phytochemistry 4: 199-202.
  6. Hanssen HP, Schadler M (1985) Pflanzen in der Tradionellen chinesischen Medizin. Dtsch Apoth. Ztg 125: 1239-1243.
  7. Ozenda P, Clauzade G (1970) Les lichens. Masson er Cie Editeurs, Paris, Pp: 69-78.
  8. Richardson DHS (1975) The Vanashing lichens. David and Charle, North Pomfret V, 5: 95-97.
  9. Carbonnier J (1990) Le devenir des plantes utiles:Un exemple de l’intérêt des lichens dans la lutte contre la sécheresse. Bull Soc. Industrielle de Mulhouse 4: 51-58.
  10. Hale ME (1983) Thebiology of lichens. 3rd Ed, Edward Arnold, London 138 Pp.
  11. Henderson A (1984) Somememorabilia on the industrial manufacture of lichen dyestuffs, Cudbears and orchil II. Bull. Br. Lichen Soc. 55: 19-21.
  12. Bao Y, Ju Y, Li B, Sun Y (2016) Migration of trace elements from basalt substrate to co-located vegetation (lichens and mosses) at the Wudalianchi volcanos, Northeast China. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 118: 95–100.
  13. Yemets O, Gauslaa Y, Solhaug KA (2015) Monitoring with lichens – Conductivity methods assesssalt and heavymetal damage more efficiently than chlorophyll fluorescence. Ecological Indicators 55: 59-64.
  14. Jackson TA (2015) Weathering, secondary mineral genesis, and soil formation caused by lichens and mosses growing on granitic gneiss in a boreal forest environment. Geoderma, 251–252: 78-91.
  15. VertikaS, UpretiDK, RajeshB, (2014) Selection of biomonitoring species, Lichens to Biomonitor the Environment, Pp: 47-60.
  16. Cansaran D, Kahya D, Yurdakulola E, Atakol O (2006) Identification and quantitation of usnic acidfrom the lichen Usneaspecies of Anatolia and antimicrobial activity. Z Naturforsch C 61: 773-776.
  17. Guo L, Shi Q, Fang JL, Mei N, Ali AA (2008) Review of usnic acid and Usnea barbatatoxicity. Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Environmental carcinogenesis ecotoxicology reviews, 26: 317-38.
  18. Odabasoglu F, Cakir A, Suleyman H, Aslan A, Bayr Y et al. (2006) Gastroprotective and antioxidant effects of usnic acid on indomethacin-induced gastriculcer in rats. Journal of Ethnopharmacology; 03: 59-65.
  19. Hamada N (1991) Environmental Factors Affecting the Content of Usnic acid in Lichen of Ramalina. The Bryologist 94: 57-59.
  20. Dobson F (1979) Lichens: An illustrated Guide. Richmond publishing Co. Ltd. Great Britain.
  21. Culberson CF, Kristinsson H (1970) A standardized method for the identification of lichen products. J. of chromatography 46: 83-93.
  22. Arup U, Ekman S, LindblomL and Matsson JE (1993) High performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC), an improved technique for screening lichen substances. Lichenologist 25: 61-71.
  23. Feige GB, Lumbsch HT, Huneck S, Elix JA (1993) Identification of lichen substances by standardized high-performance liquid chromatographic method. J. of chromatography 646: 417-427.
  24. Culberson CF, Ammann K (1979) Standard method ezur Dünnschicht chromatographievon Flechtensubstanzen. Herzogia 5: 1-24.
  25. Boissière JC (1981) Chromatographie des substances lichéniques: notions de base. Bulletin de l’Association Française de Lichénologie 16: 1-11.
  26. Culberson CF (1972) Improved conditions and new data for the identification of lichen products by astandardizedthin-layer chromatographicmethod. J Chromatogr 72: 113-125.
  27. Culberson CF, Culberson WL, Johnson A (1981) A standardized TLC analysis of ß-orsinoldepsidones. Bryologist 94: 16-29.
  28. Hoffenk-De Graaff JH (1969) Archil, Natural Dyestuffs. ICOM, Amsterdam. 15-19.
  29. Edwards HM, Newton EM and Williams DW (2003) Molecular structural studies of lichen substances II: atranorin, gyrophoric acid, fumarprotocetraric acid, rhizocarpic acid, calcyn, pulvinicdilactones and usnic acid. Journal of Molecular Structure. 651-653: 27-37.
  30. Bjerke JW, Jones DG and Callaghan TV (2005) Environmental and Experimental Botany. 53: 139-149.
Citation: Tabbabi K, Karmous T (2016) Characterization and Identification of the Components Extracted from 28 Lichens in Tunisia by High Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography (HPTLC), Morphologic Determination of the Species and Study of the Antibiotic Effects of Usnic Acid. Med Aromat Plants 5:253.

Copyright: © 2016 Tabbabi K, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top