Journal of Developing Drugs

Journal of Developing Drugs
Open Access

ISSN: 2329-6631

+44 1478 350008

Review Article - (2016) Volume 5, Issue 1

Chemical Synonyms, Molecular Structure and Toxicological Risk Assessment of Synthetic Textile Dyes: A Critical Review

Insaf Ayadi1,2, Yasmine Souissi1,3, Ines Jlassi1, Francisco Peixoto4 and Wissem Mnif1,5*
1LR11-ES31 Laboratory of Biotechnology and Valorisation of Bio-GeoRessources, Higher Institute of Biotechnology of Sidi Thabet, BiotechPole of SidiThabet, 2020, Universiy of Manouba, Tunisia, E-mail: ayadi.i@hotmail.com
2Faculty of Sciences of Bizerte, Jarzouna - Bizerte - 7021, University of Carthage, Tunisia, E-mail: ayadi.i@hotmail.com
3Université Libre de Tunis, Institut Polytechnique IP2, 32 Avenue Kheireddine Pacha 1002 Tunis-Tunisie, Tunisia, E-mail: ayadi.i@hotmail.com
4enter for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal, E-mail: ayadi.i@hotmail.com
5Faculty of Sciences and Arts in Balgarn, PO Box 60 Balgarn- Sabt Al Alaya 61985, Bisha University, Saudi Arabia, E-mail: ayadi.i@hotmail.com
*Corresponding Author: Wissem Mnif, LR11-ES31 Laboratory of Biotechnology and Valorisation of Bio-GeoRessources, Higher Institute of Biotechnology of Sidi Thabet, BiotechPole of SidiThabet, 2020, Universiy of Manouba, Tunisia, Tel: +216-989-473-71 Email:

Abstract

Textile industry has been considered for years to be one of the major sources of worldwide pollution problems. Huge amount of wastewater is generated at different stages of textile manufacturing. These waste products are mostly released in the environment without prior consideration. In Fact, they are highly contaminated with lot of chemicals including dyes. For this reason, the investigation of the effects of those compounds over the environment and human health has become a great interest. This review outlines the chemical synonyms, molecular structure and the toxicological effects of 85 textile dyes. The potential fate and effect of those substances on aquatic, human health and ecosystem are discussed in this article.

<

Keywords: Textile industry; Synthetic dyes; Toxicity; Toxicological effects

Introduction

Since the discovery of the brilliant fuchsia color, or mauve in 1856, thousands of synthetic dyes have been manufactured all over the world [1]. Actually, there are approximately 10,000 different synthetic dyes available in the market [2] with a global annual production of almost 800,000 tons [3]. Such dyes may be defined as colored matters and when applied they are to substrates may provide them with a permanent color that by any means will not be affected by sun rays, soap and water [1,4]. Specifically, every dye stuff consists of a group of atoms, called ‘chromophore’ that is responsible for the substrates’ coloration by absorbing certain wavelengths of light from the nearby ultraviolet region. It also contains an ‘auxochrome’ which helps the chromophore attach to the fiber by means of stable chemical bonds. The most important chromophores are: N=O, -NO2, -N=N-, -C=O, C=S, -C= N and (CH-CH)n and the compounds that bear them are known as chromogens [4].

These organic chemicals are usually classified as azo, anthraquinone, vat, phtalocyanine, indigo, polymethilene, carbonium and nitro dyes [5-7]. Azo dyes which have an azo bond (R1–N = N–R2), where R1and R2 are aromatic groups, can be substituted by sulphonated groups. R1 and R2 represents the biggest and most versatile group and composes about one-half of all dyes produced [8,9]. However, anthraquinone dyes constitute the second most important category of textile dyes and are often used for dyeing cellulosic fabric (such as cotton), wool and polyamide fibers. It is to be noted that a large diversity of chemical structures of anthraquinone colorants exist [10]. Concerning the nitro dyes, it was the first to be manufactured and rarely used. In terms of its atomic structure, the nitroso dyes consist on an NO2 group in orthoposition to an electron-donating substituent such as usually NH2 and an OH group [11].

Each year, nearly 140 000 tons of synthetic dyes are lost into the environment because of the dyeing process [11,12]. The discharge of dye-containing effluents has obvious negative effects. Those effluents are characterized by strong colors, high pH variations, high chemical oxygen demand (COD) and increased biotoxicity against bacteria [13]. Even at very low concentration (10-50 mg/L) water-soluble dyes may, intensively, affect the aquatic organisms [14-16] and interfere with the transmission of sun beams into streams and, therefore, reduce photosynthetic activity [17]. It is worth noting that these chemicals show high neutrality to light, temperature and microbial attacks [18]. They are also known to be persistent in the environment [15].

There has been increasing concern in recent years the occurrence, fate and toxicity of textile dyes products in the environment. This paper is a state of the art on the toxicological effects of those chemical substances.

Harmful Effects of Textile Dyes and their Metabolite

Textile dyes extensively used in several manufacturing process have been proved to be harmful to the human health as well as to the environment. Moreover, these chemicals, especially the azo dyes, could raise potential environmental concerns considering their toxic, mutagenic and carcinogenic effects [19-22].

As the discharge of azo dyes into water bodies presents human and ecological risks, a few synthetic dyes have been tested in order to evaluate their potential toxicity. The results have shown that these dyes have toxic effects on a variety of organisms such us aquatic animals [23]. Appendix1 displays about 85 toxic textile dyes.

Textile dyes and its metabolite carcinogenic effect, mutagenic effect and DNA damages

It has been reported that dyes toxicity may happen due to either the direct action of the original compound or its intermediate metabolites such as naphthalene, benzidine and other aromatic amines [24,25]. Those compounds are by-products of cleavage of azo bond by microorganisms, and reported to be carcinogenic and mutagenic [24,26]. They were proved to be more dangerous than the parent compound [27].

In this context, the benzidine-based azo Direct Red 28 intermediate metabolites, the benzidine and 4-aminobiphenyl were reported to be the real causes of its toxicity [25]. The reduction of textile azo dyes may breed DNA binding motifs [28,29] and may cause multiple toxic effects.

Along with the aforementioned problems, some dyes have been shown to have a propensity to bio accumulate in fish [15,30]. Moreover heavy-metal ions that are originally present in textile effluents have been detected to be higher in algae and plants which are exposed to such effluents [15]. Some experiments have revealed that wastewater generated by textile industry has high amount of Total Organic Carbon (TOC), high salt content and extremes in pH [31,32]. It was reported that high pH values are registered in reactive dye bathes and low ones in acid dye baths. Lastly, it was observed that colored effluents decrease soil fertility and inhibit several plants (Appendix 1).

Conclusion

Environmental textile dyes hazards are associated to alarming human and animal’s health side effects. Through this study we tried to highlight the fact that textile dyes discharged into the environment have alarming effects as both parent compound of dyes and their breakingdown products. They induce various cytotoxic, genotoxic, mutagenic and carcinogenic effects. Even at low concentration, these substances are proved to be responsible for harmful effects. Therefore, textile dyes treatment before eventual release in the environment has become a serious preoccupation. Several physical, chemical and biological processes are nowadays used in order to remove those compounds. However, their efficiency discussed as the danger associated to those compounds as well as to their degradation products which are generated through those treatment and unknown is of real concern.

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Tunisian Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research. Thanks are also to Dr. Sharif Mohammad Shahidullah from Department of English, Faculty of Sciences and Arts in Balgarn, Bisha University, Saudi Arabia for his contribution on correction of English language.

References

  1. Saratale RG, Saratale GD, Chang JS, Govindwar SP (2011) Bacterial decolorization and degradation of azo dyes: A review. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 42: 138-157.
  2. Bazin I, Ibn Hadj Hassine A, Haj Hamouda Y, Mnif W, Bartegi A, et al. (2012) Estrogenic and anti-estrogenic activity of 23 commercial textile dyes. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 85: 131-136.
  3. Asgher M, Azim N, Bhatti HN (2009) Decolorization of practical textile industry effluents by white rot fungus Coriolus versicolor IBL-04. Biochemical Engineering Journal 47: 61-65.
  4. Rai HS, Bhattacharyya MS, Singh J, Bansal TK, Vats P, et al. (2005) Removal of Dyes from the Effluent of Textile and Dyestuff Manufacturing Industry: A Review of Emerging Techniques with Reference to Biological Treatment. Crit Rev Env Sci Tec 35: 219-238.
  5. Abrahart EN (1977) Dyes and their Intermediates. Edward Arnold Ltd., London.
  6. Anliker R (1979) Ecotoxicology of dyestuffs-a joint effort by industry. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 3: 59-74.
  7. Sponza DT (2006) Toxicity studies in a chemical dye production industry in Turkey. J Hazard Mater 138: 438-447.
  8. Méndez-Paz D, Omil F, Lema JM (2005) Anaerobic treatment of azo dye Acid Orange 7 under batch conditions. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 36: 264-272.
  9. Mohan SV, Prasad KK, Rao NC, Sarma PN (2005) Acid azo dye degradation by free and immobilized horseradish peroxidase (HRP) catalyzed process. Chemosphere 58: 1097-1105.
  10. Christie RM (2001) Colour Chemistry. Cambridge, United Kingdom: The Royal Society of Chemistry.
  11. Zollinger H (1987) Synthesis, Properties of Organic Dyes and Pigments. In: Color Chemistry. New York, USA: VCH Publishers: 92-102.
  12. Cooper P (1995) Colour in dyestuff effluent, the society of dyers and colourists, Oxford: Aden Press.
  13. Walker GM, Weatherley LR (2000) Biodegradation and biosorption of acid anthraquinone dye. Environ Pollut 108: 219-223.
  14. Anliker R (1977) Color chemistry and the environment. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 1: 211-237.
  15. Banat IM, Nigam P, Singh D, Marchant R (1996) Microbial decolorization of textile-dye- containing effluents: a review. Bioresource Technology 58: 217-227.
  16. Demirci O, Hamamci DA (2013) Antioxidant responses in Phanerochaete chrysosporium exposed to Astrazone Red FBL textile dye. Cell Biochemistry and function 31: 86-90.
  17. Ciçek F, Ozer D, Ozer A, Ozer A (2007) Low cost removal of reactive dyes using wheat bran. J Hazard Mater 146: 408-416.
  18. Kokol V, Doliška A, Eichlerová I, Baldrian P, Nerud F (2007) Decolorization of textile dyes by whole cultures of Ischnoderma resinosum and by purified laccase and Mn-peroxidase. Enzyme Microbiol. Technol 40: 1673-1677.
  19. Spadaro JT, Gold MH, Renganathan V (1992) Degradation of azo dyes by the lignin-degrading fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Appl Environ Microbiol 58: 2397-2401.
  20. Sponza DT, Isik M (2005) Toxicity and intermediates of C.I. Direct Red 28 dye through sequential anaerobic/aerobic treatment. Proc Biochem 40: 2735-2744.
  21. Lu K, Zhang XL, Zhao YL, Wu ZL (2010) Removal of color from textile dyeing wastewater by foam separation. J Hazard Mater 182: 928-932.
  22. Nagel-Hassemer ME, Carvalho-Pinto CRS, Matias WG, Lapolli FR (2011) Removal of coloured compounds from textile industry effluents by UV/H2O2 advanced oxidation and toxicity evaluation. Environmental Technology 32: 1867-1874.
  23. Young L, Yu J (1997) Ligninase-catalysed decolourization of synthetic dyes. Water Research 31: 1187-1193.
  24. Osugi ME, Umbuzeiro GA, De Castro FJ, Zanoni MV (2006) Photoelectrocatalytic oxidation of remazol turquoise blue and toxicological assessment of its oxidation products. J Hazard Mater 137: 871-877.
  25. Bafana A, Jain M, Agrawal G, Chakrabarti T (2009) Bacterial reduction in genotoxicity of Direct Red 28 dye. Chemosphere 74: 1404-1406.
  26. Rafii F, Cerniglia CE (1995) Reduction of azo dyes and nitroaromatic compounds by bacterial enzymes from the human intestinal tract. Environ Health Perspect 103 Suppl 5: 17-19.
  27. Wong PK, Yuen PY (1996) Decolorization and biodegradation of methyl red by Klebsiella pneumoniae RS-13. Water Research 30: 1736-1744.
  28. Levine WG (1991) Metabolism of azo dyes: implication for detoxication and activation. See comment in PubMed Commons below Drug Metab Rev 23: 253-309.
  29. Stiborová M, Frei E, Schmeiser HH (1992) Comparison of cytochrome P-450- and peroxidase-mediated activations of carcinogenic azo dyes and N-nitrosamines. Gen Physiol Biophys 11: 489-498.
  30. Anliker R, Clarke EA, Moser P (1981) Use of the partition coefficient as an indicator of bio-accumulation tendency of dyestuffs in fish. Chemosphere 10: 263-274.
  31. Golob V, Vinder A, Simoni M (2005) Efficiency of the coagulation/ flocculation method for the treatment of dye bath effluents. Dyes and Pigments 67: 93-97.
  32. Franciscon E, Grossman MJ, Paschoal JA, Reyes FG, Durrant LR (2012) Decolorization and biodegradation of reactive sulfonated azo dyes by a newly isolated Brevibacterium sp. strain VN-15. Springerplus 1: 37.
  33. Chou PH, Matsui S, Misaki K, Matsuda T (2007) Isolation and identification of xenobiotic aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligands in dyeing wastewater. Environ Sci Technol 41: 652-657.
  34. Al-Sabti K (2000) Chlorotriazine reactive Azo red 120 textile dye induces micronuclei in fish. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 47: 149-155.
  35. Tsuboy MS, Angeli JP, Mantovani MS, Knasmüller S, Umbuzeiro GA, et al. (2007) Genotoxic, mutagenic and cytotoxic effects of the commercial dye CI Disperse Blue 291 in the human hepatic cell line HepG2. Toxicol In Vitro 21: 1650-1655.
  36. Umbuzeiro GA, Freeman HS, Warren SH, De Oliveira DP, Terao Y, et al. (2005) The contribution of azo dyes to the mutagenic activity of the Cristais River, Chemosphere 60: 55-64.
  37. de Aragão Umbuzeiro G, Freeman H, Warren SH, Kummrow F, Claxton LD (2005) Mutagenicity evaluation of the commercial product CI Disperse Blue 291 using different protocols of the Salmonella assay. Food Chem Toxicol 43: 49-56.
  38. Chequer FM, Angeli JP, Ferraz ER, Tsuboy MS, Marcarini JC, et al. (2009) The azo dyes Disperse Red 1 and Disperse Orange 1 increase the micronuclei frequencies in human lymphocytes and in HepG2 cells. Mutat Res 676: 83-86.
  39. Ferraz ER, Grando MD, Oliveira DP (2011) The azo dye Disperse Orange 1 induces DNA damage and cytotoxic effects but does not cause ecotoxic effects in Daphnia similis and Vibrio fischeri. J Hazard Mater 192: 628-633.
  40. Güngördü A, Birhanli A, Ozmen M (2013) Biochemical response to exposure to six textile dyes in early developmental stages of Xenopus laevis. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 20: 452-460.
  41. Ayadi I, Monteirod SM, Regaya I, Coimbrad A, Fernandes F, et al. (2015) Biochemical and histological changes in the liver and gill of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus exposed to Red 195 Dye. RSC Adv 5: 87168–87178.
  42. Zeiger E, Anderson B, Haworth S, Lawlor T, Mortelmans K (1988) Salmonella mutagenicity tests: IV. Results from the testing of 300 chemicals. Environ Mol Mutagen 11 Suppl 12: 1-157.
  43. Stiborová M, Martínek V, Rýdlová H, Hodek P, Frei E (2002) Sudan I is a potential carcinogen for humans: evidence for its metabolic activation and detoxication by human recombinant cytochrome P450 1A1 and liver microsomes. Cancer Res 62: 5678-5684.
  44. An Y, Jiang L, Cao J, Geng C, Zhong L (2007) Sudan I induces genotoxic effects and oxidative DNA damage in HepG2 cells. Mutat Res 627: 164-170.
  45. National Toxicology Program (1982) Carcinogenesis Bioassay of C.I. Solvent Yellow 14 (CAS No. 842-07-9) in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Feed Study). Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser 226: 1-164.
  46. McGregor DB, Brown AG, Howgate S, McBride D, Riach C, et al. (1991) Responses of the L5178Y mouse Lymphoma cell forward mutation assay. V: 27 coded chemicals. Environ Mol Mutagen 17: 196-219.
  47. Stahlmann R, Wegner M, Riecke K, Kruse M, Platzek T (2006) Sensitising potential of four textile dyes and some of their metabolites in a modified local lymph node assay. Toxicology 219: 113-123.
  48. IARC (1975) Monograph on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man, Some Armatic Azo Compounds. Lyon 8: 97-100.
  49. Ding F, Li N, Han B, Liu F, Zhang L (2009) The binding of C.I. Acid red 2 to human seum albumin: Determination of binding mechanism and binding site using fluorescence spectroscopy. Dyes and Pigments 83: 249-257
  50. IARC (1993) Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Occupational Exposures of Hairdressers and Barbersand Personal Use of Hair Colourants; Some Hair Dyes, Cosmetic Colourants, Industrial Dyestuffs and Aromatic Amines 57.
  51. Meal PF, Cocker J, Wilson HK, Gilmour JM (1981) Search for benzidine and its metabolites in urine of workers weighing benzidine-derived dyes. Br J Ind Med 38: 191-193.
  52. Robens JF, Dill GS, Ward JM, Joiner JR, Griesemer RA, et al. (1980) Thirteen-week subchronic toxicity studies of Direct Blue 6, Direct Black 38, and Direct Brown 95 dyes. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 54: 431-442.
  53. Cerniglia CE, Zhuo Z, Manning BW, Federle TW, Heflich RH (1986) Mutagenic activation of the benzidine-based dye direct black 38 by human intestinal microflora. Mutat Res 175: 11-16.
  54. Phugare SS, Kalyani DC, Patil AV, Jadhav JP (2011) Textile dye degradation by bacterial consortium and subsequent toxicological analysis of dye and dye metabolites using cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and oxidative stress studies. J Hazard Mater 186: 713-723.
  55. Oliveira GA, Ferraz ER, Chequer FM, Grando MD, Angeli JP, et al. (2010) Chlorination treatment of aqueous samples reduces, but does not eliminate, the mutagenic effect of the azo dyes Disperse Red 1, Disperse Red 13 and Disperse Orange 1. Mutat Res 703: 200-208.
  56. Ferraz ER, Umbuzeiro GA, de-Almeida G, Caloto-Oliveira A, Chequer FM, et al. (2011) Differential toxicity of Disperse Red 1 and Disperse Red 13 in the Ames test, HepG2 cytotoxicity assay, and Daphnia acute toxicity test. Environ Toxicol 26: 489-497.
  57. Venturini S, Tamaro M (1979) Mutagenicity of anthraquinone and azo dyes in Ames' Salmonella typhimurium test. Mutat Res 68: 307-312.
  58. Tee PN, Wong YT, Sherry JP, Bols NC (2011) Effect of acid blue 80, an anthracenedione dye, on rainbow trout liver, gill and gut cells in vitro. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 74: 1874-1878.
  59. Bae JS, Freeman HS (2007) Aquatic toxicity evaluation of new direct dyes to the Daphnia magna. Dyes and Pigments 73: 81-85.
  60. Ding Y, Sun C, Xu X (2009) Simultaneous identification of nine carcinogenic dyes from textiles by liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization mass spectrometry via negative/positive ion switching mode. Eur J Mass Spectrom (Chichester, Eng) 15: 705-713.
  61. Lima ROA, Bazo AP, Salvadori DMF, Rech CM, Oliveira DP, et al. (2007) Mutagenic and carcinogenic potential of a textile azo dye processing plant effluent that impacts a drinking water source. Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 626: 53-60.
  62. Ben Mansour H, Mosrati R, Corroler D, Ghedira K, Barillier D, et al. (2009) In vitro mutagenicity of Acid Violet 7 and its degradation products by Pseudomonas putida mt-2: Correlation with chemical structures. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 27: 231-236.
  63. Ben Mansour H, Barillier D, Corroler D, Ghedira K, Chekir-Ghedira L, et al. (2009) In vitro study of DNA damage induced by acid orange 52 and its biodegradation derivatives. Environ Toxicol Chem 28: 489-495.
  64. Ben Mansour H, Mosrati R, Corroler D, Ghedira K, Bariller D, et al. (2010) Acid violet 7 and its biodegradation products induce chromosome aberration, lipid peroxidation and cholinesterase inhibition in mouse bone morrow. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res 17: 1371-1378.
  65. Wang C, Yediler A, Linert D, Wang Z, Kettrup A (2002) Toxicity evaluation of reactive dye stuff, auxiliaries and selected effluents in textile finishing industry to luminescent bacteria vibrio fisheri, Chemosphere 46: 339-344.
  66. Novotný C, Dias N, Kapanen A, Malachová K, Vándrovcová M, et al. (2006) Comparative use of bacterial, algal and protozoan tests to study toxicity of azo- and anthraquinone dyes. Chemosphere 63: 1436-1442.
  67. Chung KT, Chen SC, Claxton LD (2006) Review of the Salmonella typhimurium mutagenicity of benzidine, benzidine analogues, and benzidine-based dyes. Mutat Res 612: 58-76.
  68. Gerundo N, Alderman DJ, Clifton-Hadely RS, Feist SW (1991) Pathological effects of repeated doses of malachite green: a preliminary study. J. Fish Dis 14: 521-532.
  69. Musa SO, Omoregie E (1999) Haematological changes in the mud?sh, Clarias gariepinus (Burchell) exposed to malachite green. J. Aquat Sci 14: 37–42.
  70. Srivastava S, Sinha R, Roy D (2004) Toxicological effects of malachite green. Aquat Toxicol 66: 319-329.
  71. Mansour HB, Mosrati R, Limem I, Corroler D, Ghedira K, et al. (2009) Genotoxic and antibutyrylcholinesterasic activities of acid violet 7 and its biodegradation products. Drug Chem Toxicol 32: 230-237.
  72. Schneider K, Hafner C, Jäger I (2004) Mutagenicity of textile dye products. J Appl Toxicol 24: 83-91.
  73. Jäger I, Hafner C, Schneider K (2004) Mutagenicity of different textile dye products in Salmonella typhimurium and mouse lymphoma cells. Mutat Res 561: 35-44.
  74. Przybojewska B (1996) An evaluation of the genotoxic properties of some chosen dyes using the micronucleus test in vivo. Mutat Res 367: 93-97.
  75. Nestmann ER, Douglas GR, Matula TI, Gran CE, Kowbel DJ (1979) Mutagenic Activity of Rhodamine Dyes and Their Impurities as Detected by Mutation Induction in Salmonella and DMA Damage in Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells. Cancer Res 39: 4412-4417.
  76. Sharma MK, Sobti RC (2000) Rec effect of certain textile dyes in Bacillus subtilis. Mutat Res 465: 27-38.
  77. Garner RC, Nutman CA (1977) Testing of some azo dyes and their reduction products for mutagenicity using Salmonella typhimurium TA 1538. Mutat Res 44: 9-19.
  78. Tezcanli-Guyer G, Ince NH (2003) Degradation and toxicity reduction of textile dyestuff by ultrasound. Ultrason Sonochem 10: 235-240.
  79. Ogugbue CJ, Oranusi NA (2005) Toxicity of azo dyes to the freshwater shrimp (Desmocaris trispinosa). International Journal of Natural And applied Sciences 1: 37- 44.
  80. Verma Y (2008) Acute toxicity assessment of textile dyes and textile and dye industrial effluents using Daphnia magna bioassay. Toxicol Ind Health 24: 491-500.
  81. Tamaro M, Monti-Bragadin C, Banfi E (1975) Mutagenic activity of anthraquinone derivatives used as dyes in a textile factory. Boll Ist Sieroter Milan 54: 105-107.
  82. Ding F, Zhang L, Diao JX, Li XN, Ma L, et al. (2012) Human serum albumin stability and toxicity of anthraquinone dye alizarin complexone: an albumin-dye model. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 79: 238-246.
  83. IARC (1982) Some industrial chemicals and dyestuffs. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risk Chem Hum 29: 1-398.
Citation: Ayadi I, Souissi Y, Jlassi I, Peixoto F, Mnif W (2016) Chemical Synonyms, Molecular Structure and Toxicological Risk Assessment of Synthetic Textile Dyes: A Critical Review. J Develop Drugs 5:151.

Copyright: © 2016 Ayadi I, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top