Journal of Chromatography & Separation Techniques
Open Access

Chromatography Detectors: Principles, Applications, and Advancements

Xiao He^{* *}Correspondence: Xiao He, Department of Chromatography, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China, Email:

Author info »

Description

In chromatography, detectors are essential for identifying and quantifying the separated components of a mixture. They play a critical role in converting the physical separation of analytes into measurable signals, which can then be analyzed to determine the composition and concentration of substances in a sample. Different types of detectors are used depending on the chromatographic technique (e.g., gas chromatography, liquid chromatography) and the nature of the analytes. Measures the absorbance of analytes at specific wavelengths of UV or visible light [1-4].

The amount of light absorbed is proportional to the concentration of the analyte. Suitable for organic compounds with chromophores (e.g., aromatic rings, conjugated systems). Simple, cost-effective, and widely applicable. Limited to compounds that absorb UV or visible light. Detects the emission of light from analytes that fluoresce after being excited by a specific wavelength. The intensity of fluorescence is proportional to the concentration of the analyte. Ideal for compounds that are naturally fluorescent or can be derivative to be fluorescent. Highly sensitive and selective, suitable for trace analysis. Limited to fluorescent compounds, and requires specific conditions for excitation and emission. Measures the mass-to-charge ratio of ions to identify and quantify analytes. It provides detailed molecular information and structural insights. Used for a wide range of compounds, providing detailed analysis including molecular weight and structure. High sensitivity and specificity, capable of identifying unknown compounds [5-7].

Expensive, complex, and requires specialized knowledge. Measures changes in the refractive index of the mobile phase as analytes pass through the detector. The change in refractive index is proportional to the concentration of the analyte. Suitable for compounds that do not absorb UV light, such as sugars and polymers. Non-destructive, suitable for a wide range of compounds. Less sensitive than UV-Vis and fluorescence detectors, affected by changes in mobile phase composition. Measures changes in electrical properties (current or potential) of analytes that are electroactive. This is based on redox reactions occurring at the electrode surface. Ideal for compounds that can undergo redox reactions, such as neurotransmitters and some pharmaceuticals. Highly sensitive for electroactive substances, allows for selective detection. Limited to electroactive compounds, requires careful electrode maintenance. Measures the electrical conductivity of the mobile phase as analytes with ionic properties alter the conductivity. It is used mainly in ion chromatography. Effective for ionic or polar compounds, such as inorganic ions and organic acids. Useful for detecting ionic species, non-destructive. Less effective for non-ionic compounds, sensitive to changes in mobile phase conductivity. Detects ions produced during the combustion of organic compounds in a hydrogen flame. The amount of ionization is proportional to the concentration of the analyte. Commonly used in gas chromatography for hydrocarbons and volatile organic compounds. Highly sensitive to organic compounds, especially hydrocarbons. Requires a flame, which can be hazardous, and is less effective for compounds that do not combust. Measures changes in the thermal conductivity of the carrier gas as analytes elute. It is used in gas chromatography. Suitable for detecting a wide range of gases, including both organic and inorganic species. Universal detector for gases, relatively simple. Less sensitive than FID, and may have difficulty with lowconcentration analytes. The nature of the analytes (e.g., UVabsorbing, electroactive) influences the choice of detector [8-10].

Conclusion

Detectors are a vital component in chromatography, providing the means to identify and quantify separated compounds. Each type of detector has its own principles, advantages, and limitations, making it essential to select the most appropriate one based on the specific analytical requirements. Advances in detector technology continue to enhance the capabilities of chromatography, offering greater sensitivity, specificity, and versatility in various applications.

References

1. Lobo S. Is there enough focus on lipophilicity in drug discovery?. Expert opinion on drug discovery. 2020 Mar 3; 15(3):261-3. K DeLaney

   [Cross Ref] [Google Scholar] [Pub Med]

2. Buchberger AR, DeLaney K, Johnson J, Li L. Mass spectrometry imaging: A review of emerging advancements and future insights. Anal Chem. 2018; 90(1):240-265.

   [Cross Ref] [Google Scholar] [Pub Med]

3. Chughtai K, Heeren RM. Mass spectrometric imaging for biomedical tissue analysis. Chem Rev. 2010; 110(5):3237-3277.

   [Cross Ref] [Google Scholar] [Pub Med]

4. Zaima N, Hayasaka T, Goto-Inoue N, Setou M. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization imaging mass spectrometry. Int J Mol Sci. 2010; 11(12):5040-5055.

   [Cross Ref] [Google Scholar] [Pub Med]

5. Goodwin RJ, Nilsson A, Mackay CL, Swales JG, Johansson MK, Billger M, et al. Exemplifying the screening power of mass spectrometry imaging over label-based technologies for simultaneous monitoring of drug and metabolite distributions in tissue sections. J Biomol Screen. 2016; 21(2):187-193.

   [Cross Ref] [Google Scholar] [Pub Med]

6. Murphy RC, Hankin JA, Barkley RM. Imaging of lipid species by MALDI mass spectrometry. J Lipid Res. 2009; 50:S317-322.

   [Cross Ref] [Google Scholar] [Pub Med]

7. Jackson SN, Baldwin K, Muller L, Womack VM, Schultz JA, Balaban C, et al. Imaging of lipids in rat heart by MALDI-MS with silver nanoparticles. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2014; 406(5):1377-1386.

   [Cross Ref] [Google Scholar] [Pub Med]

8. Findley ME. Vaporization through porous membranes. Ind Eng Chem Process Des Dev. 1967; 6:226-230. 

   [Cross Ref] [Google Scholar]

9. Tijing LD, Choi JS, Lee S, Kim SH, Shon HK. Recent progress of membrane distillation using electrospun nanofibrous membrane. J Membr Sci. 2014; 453:435-462.

   [Cross Ref] [Google Scholar]

10. Pan CY, Xu GR, Xu K, Zhao HL, Wu YQ, Su HC, et al. Electrospun nanofibrous membranes in membrane distillation: Recent developments and future perspectives. BMC Immunol. 2019; 221:44-63.

    [Cross Ref] [Google Scholar]