Journal of Defense Management
Open Access

Civil Society and Military Organizations

David Willey^{* *}Correspondence: David Willey, Department of Defense Management, Jamia Millia Islamia University, New Delhi, India, India, Email:

Author info »

Description

The political science portion of the area is the primary emphasis which also briefly discusses related fields when pertinent. As opposed to historians, political scientists have a propensity to search for systematic generalisations of causation and effect. Political scientists aim to explain what happens generally and, if possible, forecast what would probably happen in the next example given the ceteris paribus restriction, rather than to describe what happened in a specific instance. Political scientists, as opposed to sociologists, concentrate primarily on the structures of political control [1].

Sociologists' immediate concerns are only relevant as much as they may have a causal connection to the fundamental political question of who decides what, when, how, and to what effect. One such factor is the integration of the military into society. Without a doubt, the importance given to political science theory in this piece would offend sociologists and historians [2]. As in other areas, the nomothetic vs. ideographic debate is present here, and it is debatable whether political science is the primary field for the investigation of civil-military relations. However, compared to other political science subfields, sociologists and historians are likely to pay more attention to innovations in political theory in this subject [3].

Thus, while this science of teh political science civil-military literature is blatantly narrow in scope, it does have at least a passing interest in related fileds.

Influence of civil society

Any non-profit, voluntary citizen group that is organised on a local, national, or worldwide level is referred to as a Civil Society Organisation (CSO) or Non-Governmental Organisation (NGO). Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) execute a range of services and humanitarian tasks, raise citizens' concerns to governments, monitor policies, and promote political engagement at the local level. They are task-oriented and motivated by people who have a similar interest. CSOs offer analysis and knowledge, act as alert systems, and support the monitoring and execution of international agreements, such as Agenda 2030 and the Sustainable Development Goals [4]. Typically, they are structured around particular concerns, such as the UN's three pillars of development, human rights, and peace and security.

CSOs frequently advocate UN commemorations as well as global years and decades declared by the General Assembly to draw attention to crucial issues affecting mankind. Depending on where they are located and what they are mandated to do, their connections with the offices and agencies of the UN System vary.

Influence of military defense

India's defence, in its entirety, is the responsibility of the Indian government. The President has full authority over the armed forces. The Cabinet is in charge of overseeing national defence.

This is done through the Ministry of Defence, which gives the Armed Forces the resources and the policy framework they need to carry out their duties in the context of national defence [5].

The Ministry of Defense is led by the Raksha Mantri (Defense Minister).

In order for the Services Headquarters, Inter-Services Organizations, Production Establishments, and Research and Development Organizations to implement the policy directives of the Government on all defence and security-related topics, the Defence Ministry must first get them. Additionally, it is necessary to ensure that the government's policy directives are carried out effectively and that approved programmes are carried out within the available budgetary constraints. Department of Defense (DOD), Department of Defense Production (DDP), Department of Defence Research & Development (DDR&D), Department of Ex-Servicemen Welfare, and Finance Division make up the Ministry of Defense.

Conclusion

To maintain the combat strength, low U.S. casualty rates, and avoidance of noncombatant casualties required for ongoing public acceptance of U.S. army deployment in regional instability, military technology dominance, as demonstrated in Operation Desert Storm, will be required.

References

1. Shields P. Civil military relations. Encyclopedia of public administration and public policy. 2015:564-569.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

2. Brooks RA. Integrating the civil–military relations subfield. Annu Rev Polit Sci. 2019;22:379-398.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

3. Shields PM. Civil‐Military Relations: Changing Frontiers.JSTOR.2006;66:924-928.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

4. Cohen J, Segal MW. Veterans, the Vietnam era, and marital dissolution: An event history analysis. Armed Forces Soc. 2009;36(1):19-37.

5. Gee D, Taylor R. Is it counterproductive to enlist minors into the army?. RUSI J. 2016;161(6):36-48.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]