ISSN: 2161-0940
+44 1300 500008
Research Article - (2013) Volume 3, Issue 2
The left gastric vein (LGV), formerly called the gastric coronary vein, is an important tributary of the portal system. It runs along the lesser curvature of the stomach, descends along the gastropancreatic fold, and drains into the portal vein (PV) and splenic vein (SpV). Accidental injury to the LGV is often due to its various patterns of inflow and route relative to the surrounding arteries. Because the LGV and mesenteric vein flow into the PV and SpV, which are major blood vessels, injury to the LGV can lead to heavy blood loss and difficulty in maintaining hemostasis, even during open gastrectomy.
Laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer is as oncologically effective as open surgery, while having significant advantages over the latter, including smaller sized surgical incisions, reduced intraoperative bleeding, less postoperative pain, faster recovery of bowel function, shorter hospital stay, faster return to daily activities, and improved quality of life [1-5]. However, the vessels around the stomach are anatomically complicated and have many variations. The LGV requires dissection during gastric surgery, but its drainage patterns vary. The surgeon’s intuitive touch and exposure are lacking during laparoscopic surgery, with only the laparoscopic grasping forceps used for traction and separation in the suprapancreatic area. The shape of the blood vessels cannot be determined intuitively, increasing the likelihood of vascular injury and LGV bleeding during lymph node dissection in patients with gastric cancer. This can affect the patient’s circulation and ability to undergo subsequent surgery. Therefore, it is important to determine the anatomic variations of the LGV. This study therefore analyzed anatomic variations in the LGV observed in 1325 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical resection for gastric cancer.
Patients
Beginning in May 2007, the Department of Gastric Surgery of the Affiliated Union Hospital of Fujian Medical University established a video database of laparoscopic gastrectomy. By June 2012, the video database included data on 1325 patients who had undergone laparoscopic radical resection for gastric cancer. The LGV of these patients was anatomically exposed during lymph node dissection. This study compared operation time and intraoperative blood loss in patients who underwent laparoscopic assisted gastrectomy (LAG): (1) between May 2007 and December 2009, the initial period of LAG, and (2) between January 2010 and June 2012, during which surgeons were more experienced with LAG.
Surgical procedures
The assistant initially held and tensed the gastropancreatic fold and turned the stomach up. Subsequently, the surgeon gently pressed down the pancreas, exposing its superior border and, using an ultrasonic scalpel, separated the pancreas membrane to reach the posterior pancreas space. The anatomic space at the surface of the SpA was separated from left to right to reach the root of the SpA. From the root of the SpA, the assistant pulled up the lymphatic fatty tissue, which was dissected, and used an ultrasonic scalpel to separate the anatomic space at the surface of the artery. The lymphatic fatty tissue along the celiac artery was dissected, and the roots of the LGA and LGV were exposed. Finally, the surgeon dissected the lymphatic fatty tissue around the LGA and LGV using an ultrasonic scalpel, and skeletonized and cut the LGA and LGV at the superior border of the CHA or SpA. All operations were undertaken with the goal of curative resection (R0), along with D2 LN dissection according to the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma, third edition (JCGC3) [6]. The surgical processes and vascular anatomy were documented in all patients using the surgical video and high definition images. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients for publication of this report and any accompanying images, and the study was approved by our institutional review board.
Statistical analysis
Student's t-tests were used to evaluate continuous variables. Probability (p) values <0.05 were regarded as statistically significant.
Normal location of the LGV in relation to the perigastric arteries
The location of the LGV was identified during laparoscopic gastrectomy in all 1325 cases, and its location in relation to the perigastric arteries is summarized in Table 1. The LGV passed to the ventral side of the splenic artery (SpA) and common hepatic artery (CHA) in 743 patients (56.1%, type 1; Figure 1), and to the dorsal side of the CHA in 550 patients (41.5%, type 2; Figure 2).
Author/Site | Ventral side of the SpA | Ventral side of the CHA | Dorsal side of the CHA | Dorsal side of the SpA | Drains into the liver | Absence | Number of patients |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Miyaki T et al. [10] | 2(0.8%) | 245 | |||||
Lee SW et al. [21] | 21(51.2%) | 20(48.8%) | 41 | ||||
Kawasaki K et al. [22] | 17(21.0%) | 18(22.2%) | 40(49.4%) | 2(2.5%) | 2(2.5%) | 81 | |
Natsume T et al. [9] | 28(22.4%) | 42(33.6%) | 49(39.2%) | 6(4.8%) | 125 | ||
Miyaki A et al. [23] | 20(28.2%) | 13(18.3%) | 30(42.3%) | 8(11.3%) | 175 | ||
Present study | 743(56.1%) | 550(41.7%) | 4(0.3%) | 21(1.6%) | 7(0.5%) | 1325 |
Table 1: Previous findings on the location of the LGV in relation to the perigastric arteries
Rare locations of the LGV in relation to the perigastric arteries
In four patients (0.3%, type 3), the LGV ran across the dorsal side of the SpA and drained into the splenic vein (Figure 3), a drainage pattern differing from that of normal LGVs. In patients with this variant, small blood vessels from the anterior and posterior walls of the lesser curvature of the stomach drained into the LGV. The LGV lay close to the LGA in the high part of the lesser curvature, descended along the gastropancreatic fold, ran across the dorsal side of the SpA and drained into the splenic vein.
Aberrant locations of the LGV in relation to the perigastric arteries
We observed two patterns of aberrantly located LGVs in relation to the perigastric arteries. In one type, also known as the intrahepatic type and observed in 21 patients (1.6%), the LGV ran along the hepatogastric ligament and drained directly into the liver (Figure 4). In addition, no LGV was detected in the plica gastropancreatica and hepatogastric ligament of 7 patients (0.5%, type 5); in these patients, the right gastric vein was enlarged to compensate for the absence of the LGV (Figure 5).
LN dissection
The mean number of suprapancreatic LNs (Nos. 7-9) retrieved from all patients was 7.99 ± 3.89, and the mean number of LN metastases was 1.17 ± 2.11. The mean numbers of retrieved and metastatic suprapancreatic LNs in patients with types 1-5 LGV are shown in Table 2.
Ventral side of the SpA and CHA | Dorsal side of the CHA | Dorsal side of the SpA | Drains into the liver | Absence | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. of retrieved LNs | 7.92 ± 3.86 | 8.22 ± 3.69 | 8.50 ± 4.74 | 8.09 ± 3.23 | 7.15 ± 3.92 |
No. of metastatic LNs | 1.35 ± 2.32 | 0.95 ± 1.68 | 1.50 ± 2.60 | 1.13 ± 2.30 | 0.38 ± 1.08 |
Patients with LN metastases (%) | 300(40.38%) | 190(34.55%) | 1(25.00%) | 6(28.57%) | 2(28.57%) |
No. of No.7 retrieved LNs | 3.13 ± 2.10 | 3.38 ± 2.35 | 3.70 ± 2.45 | 3.36 ± 2.19 | 2.23 ± 1.25 |
No. of No.8 retrieved LNs | 2.27 ± 1.64 | 2.41 ± 1.91 | 2.35±2.83 | 2.64 ± 1.43 | 2.46 ± 1.45 |
No. of No.9 retrieved LNs | 2.52 ± 1.95 | 2.43 ± 1.73 | 2.45±2.06 | 2.09 ± 0.90 | 2.46 ± 2.50 |
All results reported as mean ± SD, except where indicated.
Table 2: LN dissection results in the 1325 patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy at our institution
Surgical outcomes
The mean operation time in all 1325 patients was 227.13 ± 49.13 min, and the mean intraoperative blood loss was 141.53 ± 74.94 ml. The mean operation time was significantly shorter (164.03 ± 35.05 min vs. 222.41 ± 60.13 min, P<0.05) and the mean intraoperative blood loss significantly lower (62.07 ± 63.52 ml vs. 80.95 ± 102.21 ml, P=P<0.05) in patients who underwent surgery between January 2010 and June 2012 than between May 2007 and December 2009, suggesting better patient outcomes after surgeons had more experience with laparoscopic gastrectomy.
The LGV is one of the most important blood vessels requiring dissection during gastric surgery. Thus, alterations in LGV drainage patterns can affect surgical processes [7,8]. Knowledge of the anatomical features of the LGV is therefore required to avoid accidental dissection of the vessel. In most individuals, the LGV starts from small branches of the anterior and posterior walls of the stomach, collects blood vessels from the lesser curvature of the stomach, and descends along the gastropancreatic fold. The drainage patterns of the LGV can vary. For example, evaluation of abdominal CT scans in 125 patients showed that, in 49 (39.2%), the LGV ran across the dorsal side of the CHA, whereas, in 28 (22.4%), it ran across the ventral side of the SpA [9]. In 2 of 245 cadavers (0.8%), the LGV entered the liver directly after passing through the hepatogastric ligament [10]. Although there have been several anatomic studies of the LGV [11-15], the reasons for the different drainage patterns remain obscure. Embryologically, the primitive foregut venous plexus (PFVP) courses along the primitive foregut, while the ductus venosus (DV of Arantius) is anastomosed to the PFVP, resulting in the anastomotic omental veins (AOV) [16,17]. During standard development of the PFVP, the AOV gradually disappear, with both the right and left gastric veins ending in the main portal vein (PV). Veins, however, must adapt to changes in the intestinal canal and expansion of the liver, resulting in differences in LGV drainage patterns, probably during the course of evolution. We found that the LGV in most patients ran across the ventral sides of the SpA and CHA, or along the ventral side of the SpA and the dorsal side of the CHA.
Since the first report of laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in 1994 [18], this method has become widely accepted due to its advantages over conventional open surgery, including smaller surgical incisions, less intraoperative blood loss, reduced pain, shorter hospital stays, and reduced morbidity and mortality rates [19]. The laparoscopic technique, however, still has significant limitations: laparoscopic surgery is generally a two-dimensional type of surgery with losses in depth perception and spatial orientation. In addition, the laparoscopic technique cannot utilize the surgeon’s intuitive touch and exposure, and only the laparoscopic grasping forceps can be used for traction and separation in the local area. The inability to manipulate tissue and the limited visibility of the operative field hinder the identification of vessels and procedure-specific anatomical landmarks. Dissection of lymph nodes in the suprapancreatic area is particularly difficult laparoscopically, since the vessels in this area are especially intricate and variable and are covered by much fatty lymphoid tissue. Furthermore, the suprapancreatic area is complex, situated at a deep location and difficult to expose, and the operating space is narrow. Surgery in this area increases operating times and the risks of visceral and vascular injuries, especially in patients with anatomical vascular variations and in obese patients. Intraoperative bleeding, difficulties in identifying the correct anatomy, and limited vision are major causes of conversion to open surgery. Thus, familiarity with anatomical vascular variations in the suprapancreatic area is very important for surgeons.
The LGV, an important blood vessel located in the suprapancreatic area, requires dissection during gastric surgery. This blood vessel is small and fragile and can be easily injured during suprapancreatic lymph node dissection in patients with gastric cancer. Moreover, LGV bleeding may be difficult to control [20,21]. Familiarity with the location of the LGV in relation to the perigastric arteries may benefit these patients. Normally, surgeons operating on the region around the superior border of the pancreas should first identify and cut the LGV in the region at the superior border of the CHA or SpA, then dissect the lymph nodes. Injury to the LGV during laparoscopic gastrectomy will result in bleeding and an unclear operative field, which may be difficult to control and may increase the difficulty of lymph node dissection. This may affect the operation procedure, prolong the operation time and increase the complication rate. If the bleeding is improperly handled, it may result in incomplete lymph node dissection, leaving residual cancer cells in metastatic lymph nodes and resulting in a postoperative decrease in lymph node metastasis rate, thus affecting the characteristics and completeness of oncological resection. In obese patients and in patients with enlarged lymph nodes at the superior border of the pancreas, exposure of the LGV may be more difficult due to increased amounts of lymphatic fatty tissue surrounding the LGV, thus increasing the likelihood of damaging the LGV. Care should be taken to identify anatomic variations in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy, and to carefully dissect lymphatic fatty tissue at the superior border of the pancreas. We found that increased experience with laparoscopic gastrectomy significantly reduced operation time (P<0.05) and intraoperative blood loss (P<0.05), suggesting that increased knowledge of LGV anatomy prior to surgery increases the confidence of surgeons in operating around the LGV and that surgical skill is required for laparoscopic LN dissection in the suprapancreatic area.
In summary, we have described five anatomic variants of the LGV. In most patients, this vein runs across the dorsal side of the CHA and the ventral side of the SpA. Knowledge of LGV variants may help avoid damage to this vessel during laparoscopic gastrectomy.
Drs. Yi Wang, Chang-Ming Huang, Chao-Hui Zheng, Ping Li, Jian-Wei Xie, Jia-Bin Wang, Jian-Xian Lin and Jun Lu have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Yi Wang, Chang-Ming Huang and Chao-Hui Zheng conceived of the study, analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript; Chao -Hui Zheng helped revise the manuscript critically for important intellectual content; Ping Li, Jian-Wei Xie, Jia-Bin Wang, Jian-Xian Lin, and Jun Lu helped collect data and design the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.