Journal of Clinical Trials
Open Access

Community Awareness of Which Seizure Type Should Present to Healthcare Providers: A Potential Risk Factor of Epilepsy Treatment

Ismat Babiker^1*, Mohamed K. Elnaeim² and Awab K. Elnaeem^{1 *}Correspondence: Ismat Babiker, Department of Neurology, University of Medical Sciences and Technology, Khartoum, Sudan, Email:

Author info »

Introduction

Epilepsy is the most common neurological disease that requires long-term healthcare, affecting almost 70 million patients [1], and 500 million family members and caregivers worldwide [2]. Epilepsy Treatment Gap (TG) is defined as the difference between the number of people with active epilepsy and the number of people whose seizures are being appropriately treated in a given population at a given point of time [3]. It is estimated to be 90% of People with Epilepsy (PWE) in the developing world [4-6]. Many factors are thought to contribute to this gap, including factors related to health-care availability (manpower, medications, and cost of treatment) and factors related to misconceptions about the disease [7]. These misconceptions can lead to failure seeking appropriate healthcare, increasing cost of care, and may contribute to epilepsy stigma. Studies reported people traveling long distances and donating treasured items to healers in exchange of epilepsy treatments [4]. In a meta-analysis by Mbuba et al, the effect of misconceptions about epilepsy on TG had a variable magnitude (56%; CI: 31.1%-100%) [7], this variability was greater in studies from Africa (from Gambia, Tanzania, Senegal). Healthcare unavailability has a bigger impact on epilepsy TG than misconceptions about the disease [7]. Nevertheless, providing drugs was insufficient in reducing TG unless combined with educational campaigns [8,9]. Education also reduces the negative psychosocial effect of epilepsy, which helps improve patient’s quality of life.

Seizures can have many forms, including convulsive seizures, staring episodes, and olfactory abnormalities. We hypothesize that different seizure presentations are perceived differently in terms of presentation to doctors, stigma, and the other psychosocial aspects. People who have a dramatic presentation (convulsive seizures) may be more prone to discrimination, while children with staring episodes may be perceived by their schoolteachers as careless. Although both conditions have a similar pathophysiology and management strategy, the first group tends to present to traditional treaters, while the second group tend to be ignored and remain without treatment. In this study, we investigate the awareness about the appropriate healthcare provider when treating epilepsy; a crucial factor measuring misconceptions about epilepsy. We investigate the awareness of the educated community in Sudan about the necessity of medical evaluation of different seizure types. This study can serve as a comparison point for future studies involving the general Sudanese population.

Methodology

Study design and setting

This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted in Sudan during the period from January to April 2018 using an online survey that was distributed in social media groups containing diverse groups of Sudanese people. We used Google Forms to collect out data. It is an online data collection tool that allows automatic export of results into files compatible with various analysis software. The post included a brief description of the study purpose and a link to enter the survey webpage. The first page in the survey included a more comprehensive description of the study and a consent form. The following pages included the questionnaire with each question detailed in a separate subsection.

This method was utilized to increase the number of study participants. We did not collect any personal identifying information or email addresses and the participants were completely anonymous. In order to increase our confidence in the understandability of the questionnaire items, we distributed a pilot form to a representative sample of 20 participants. We then interviewed them in person and utilized their feedback to improve the final form of the questionnaire. When asked to give feedback about the understandability of the final questions, all the participants agreed that it was easy to understand.

Participants

Our targeted population was the Sudanese people with university or higher education. We excluded participants who are less than 18 years of age and those who reside outside of Sudan. While the participant of this study represents only the educated section of the Sudanese community, the results of this study could highlight the knowledge level of this community and serve as a comparison for future studies (Table 1).

Table 1: Demographical data of our participants.

Statistical methods

We collected data from 467 participants, and then analyzed the data using IBM SPSS statistics version 25 and used Pearson’s Chi-square test, and t-test to test for possible associations between variables.

Variables

The questionnaire consists of;

1. Age, Gender.

2. Statement evaluating participant’s awareness of the appropriate care providers for people with epilepsy.

3. One question evaluating participants source(s) of obtaining information regarding epilepsy.

4. One question giving a description of a seizure symptomatology and asking whether a patient with this presentation should present to a doctor (seizure types included were: GME, focal seizures with retained awareness, and absence seizures).

Results

We included 467 participants in our study, with females representing 60% (279). The mean age of our participants was 28 years. Ages ranged between 18 and 73, and the distribution curve was positively skewed. Two-thirds of participants obtained at least some information about epilepsy from non-scientific sources. Eighty four percent of the participants were aware that doctors are the primary health care providers for people with epilepsy. Most of our participants (92%) were aware that patients with the symptomatology of GTC seizures should present to a doctor, while only two-thirds in the case of myoclonic seizures and focal seizures with retained awareness (68.5% and 67% respectively). Only one third (30.6%) were aware that absence seizure symptomatology should present to a doctor (Table 2).

Table 2: Percentages of people who think that seizure descriptions should present to the doctor. The P-value for the chi-square test is provided for the significant association.

Discussion

This study demonstrated a difference in awareness about the appropriate healthcare provider to care for a patient with epilepsy. Most of our participants (92.7%) were aware that people with generalized tonic-clonic seizures need to present to doctors, while only 30.6% thought so in case of absence seizures and 67%, 68.5% in focal seizures with retained awareness and myoclonic seizures respectively (Table 3).

Table 3: which seizure description should present to the doctor.

Possible explanations include a more dramatic presentation in generalized tonic-clonic seizures as well as perceived danger to health. Notably, absence seizures tended to be ignored. Although the condition usually resolves by adulthood, it affects aspects such as school performance, social wellbeing, and personality. It is especially amenable to treatment as more than 90% of patients become seizure free after treatment [9]. More than 80% of our participants thought that doctors are the primary care providers for people with epilepsy rather than other healers. We asked our participants which resources they used to obtain their knowledge about epilepsy. Participants were allowed to ask more than one answer (Table 4).

Table 4: Sources of knowledge chosen by participants. P values for the chi-square test are provided for significant associations.

More than half of our participants reported at least one nonscientific source of knowledge about epilepsy. This can propagate misinformation and magnify existing stereotypes about epilepsy. We hypothesized that people regard epilepsy to present as convulsive seizures. Our findings are not conclusive but support our hypothesis. Our study sheds light on an important factor that can contribute to TG in Sudanese people with epilepsy.

Conclusion

From the above results, we can understand that majority of the participants thought that doctors were primary care providers for epilepsy than other healers, and around 60% of participants described non-scientific knowledge about epilepsy. Where it can leads to misinformation and rise in the existing stereotypes in public and many patients about epilepsy. This study demonstrated poor awareness about the necessity of presenting to a healthcare provider when experiencing symptomatology of absence and focal seizures with retained awareness. We hypothesize that this lack of awareness may contribute to the epilepsy treatment gap, and we recommend further studies to examine this hypothesis.

Limitations

As people with higher educational levels are expected to have better awareness about epilepsy, the deficiencies that we found might be more pronounced in the general population. Including only highly educated people in our study prevented the analyzing the correlation between educational level and awareness about epilepsy.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all our participants for their involvement in the study. We thank Dr. Awab Hashim for assistance in the preparation of the manuscript and figures of the article.

Authors’ Contributions

Ismat Babiker co-formed the study concept and design, codeveloped the questionnaire, distributed the data collection sheet, and co-wrote all sections of the final manuscript.

Mohamed K. Elnaeim co-formed the study concept and design, co-developed the questionnaire, distributed the data collection sheet, and co-wrote all sections of the final manuscript.

Awab K. Elnaeem co-formed the study concept and design, codeveloped the questionnaire, analyzed the data using IBM SPSS Statistics, distributed the data collection sheet, and co-wrote all sections of the final manuscript.

Ethical Considerations

The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in the study; the consent form was attached before the data collection sheet. There are no potentially identifiable human images or data is presented in the study.

References

1. Ngugi AK, Bottomley C, Kleinschmidt I, Sander JW, Newton CR. Estimation of the burden of active and lifetime epilepsy: A meta‐analytic approach. Epilepsia. 2010;51(5):883-90.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

2. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: Guidelines for Implementation: Article 5.3, Article 8, Article 11, Article 13. WHO. 2010.

   [Google Scholar]

3. Meinardi H, Scott RA, Reis R, Sander JW. The treatment gap in epilepsy: The current situation and ways forward. Epilepsia. 2001;42:136-49.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

4. Shorvon SD, Farmer PJ. Epilepsy in developing countries: A review of epidemiological, sociocultural, and treatment aspects. Epilepsia. 1988;29:S36-54.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

5. Diop AG, Hesdorffer DC, Logroscino G, Hauser WA. Epilepsy and mortality in africa: A review of the literature. Epilepsia. 2005;46:33-5.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

6. Scott RA, Lhatoo SD, Sander JW. The treatment of epilepsy in developing countries: Where do we go from here? Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79:344-51.

   [Google Scholar] [Pubmed]

7. Mbuba CK, Ngugi AK, Newton CR, Carter JA. The epilepsy treatment gap in developing countries: A systematic review of the magnitude, causes, and intervention strategies. Epilepsia. 2008;49(9):1491-503.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

8. Krishnamoorthy ES, Satishchandra P, Sander JW. Research in epilepsy: Development priorities for developing nations. Epilepsia 2003;44:5-8.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

9. Callenbach PM, Bouma PA, Geerts AT, Arts WF, Stroink H, Peeters EA, et al. Long-term outcome of childhood absence epilepsy: Dutch study of epilepsy in childhood. Epilepsy Res. 2009;83:249-56.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]