Medicinal & Aromatic Plants

Medicinal & Aromatic Plants
Open Access

ISSN: 2167-0412

+44 1300 500008

Research Article - (2016) Volume 0, Issue 0

Comparative Analysis of Heterochromatin Distribution Pattern in Wild and Cultivated Species of Curcuma L.

Lamo JM, Wahlang DR and Rao SR*
Plant Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong-793 022, Meghalaya, India
*Corresponding Author: Rao SR, Plant Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong-793 022, Meghalaya, India, Tel: 0364-2722404 Email:

Abstract

Fluorochrome banding pattern with CMA and DAPI showed variation in the type, amount and distribution of heterochromatin in all the Curcuma species studied. The study provided clear insight on the numbers and genomic components such as the repetitive (GC, AT and GC/AT-rich) and non-repetitive DNA fraction(s). The polymorphism in heterochromatic-rich repetitive fraction(s) reflects higher molecular organization of the genome and evolutionary status of the genus Curcuma. The present works entails the importance of heterochromatin rich-repetitive DNA fraction(s) which play significant role in genome organization and evolutionary pattern in the genus Curcuma.

Keywords: Curcuma; Heterochromatin; Repetitive DNA fraction(s); CMA; DAPI

Abbreviations

CMA: Chromomycin A3; DAPI: 6-diaminido-2- phenyliodole

Introduction

The genus Curcuma L. (Zingiberaceae) comprises of about 120 species [1], which are rhizomatous perennial herbs. Many of them are consumed/utilized for their utility as spices, medicines, dyes, cosmetics and starch yielding taxa [2-4]. It is widely distributed in the tropical and subtropical regions of Asia [5]. The genus Curcuma display great quantum of diversity in habitat, morphology and ethno botanical aspects [6]. From the systematic point of view, the genus Curcuma is highly challenging due to complete lack of descriptors for identification of the taxa, non-availibility of herbarium specimens and also due to ambiguity in morphological markers due to extensive interspecific hybridization in the genus Curcuma [7,8]. Polyploidy has further complicated our understanding about the genome and species relationship in the genus Curcuma resulting in the taxonomic conflict between many researchers. An increase in ploidy level is commonly associated with blurring of morphological boundaries between taxa [9], which is clearly visible in the genus Curcuma.

Cytogenetical information such as chromosome number, structure, morphology, behaviour of chromosomes during mitotic and meiotic divisions, distribution of heterochromatin content have been of considerable valuable for solving taxonomic riddles on one hand and issues related to systematics, evolution and delimitation of the taxa on the other [10,11]. These parameters are also of immense value for defining intrageneric relationships in the genus Curcuma [1,3,12-14]. Such studies in the genus Curcuma are limited to chromosome counts perhaps due to their small size and higher numbers. It is interesting to note that even molecular details such as composition and distribution pattern of heterochromatin, which are generally useful for such chromosomally problematic genera, are also lacking in the genus Curcuma. The information regarding heterochromatic regions are cytologically recognized due to its condensation and differential staining during cell division [15]. Quantitative and qualitative differentiation of the heterochromatin played significant role in understanding the molecular composition of the genome without the need of advanced molecular techniques [16].

Highly repetetive DNA sequences are the main component of the heterochromatin of higher eukaryotic genomes [17]. It is mostly enriched at the centromeric and telomeric regions of the chromosomes, depending on the species or group of species [15],which contains satellite DNA, retrotransposons and/or rDNA sequences. Heterochromatin also serves a number of other important cellular and biological roles during recombination and segregation of chromosomes in meiosis/mitosis, and global control of gene regulation and speciation [18]. Heterochromatic regions have been studied by either C banding techniques or direct staining with base-specific fluorochromes [19]. The most frequently used fluorochromes are chromomycin A3 (CMA) and 6-diaminido-2-phenyliodole (DAPI) which preferentially stains GC-rich and AT-rich regions respectively on the chromosomes [20,21], to distinguish heterochromatin from euchromatin and to permit a direct comparison of the relative GC or AT content in the chromatin fraction [22]. Thereforeit helps in identification and measurement of difference in the total amount of heterochromatin and wasextensively used for solving the taxonomic problem in several species of Crinum [23,24]and different forms of Lasia [25].

Although fluorochromes binding with CMA and DAPI have been reported in several plant genera, however, no such reports are available for the genus Curcuma.Thepresent study was conducted to determinethe distribution pattern of AT- and GC- rich regions (heterochromatin) in Curcuma species. Comparative analysis of the repetitive and non-repetitive DNA fractions may also provide useful information to understand the mechanisms underlying the chromosomal evolution in the genus. Such useful information will facilitate comparative cytogenomics and provide an insight into the patterns of chromosomal differentiation of the genus Curcuma.

Materials and Methods

Plant materials

The rhizomes of 15 Curcuma species used in the present investigation were obtained from Indian Institute of Spices Research, Kozhikode, Kerala (Table 1). The plants were grown and maintained in poly-house conditions at Department of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, North- Eastern Hill University, Shillong, Meghalaya.

S No Species ISSR voucher numbers CMA+ DAPI+ CMA+/DAPI+ % Repetitive Total  % Repetitive % Non-repetitive
Range Mean ± SD Range Mean ± SD Range Mean ± SD CMA+ DAPI+ CMA+/DAPI+
GC % AT % GC+AT %
1 C. amadaRoxb. 521 4 4 ± 0.0 - - - - 16.00 - - 16.00 84.0
2 C. aromaticaSalisb. 711 4–6 4.28 ± 0.6 4 4 ± 0.0 - - 17.12 16.00 - 33.12 66.88
3 C. comosaRoxb. 644 2–7 4.35 ± 1.4 - - 3 3 ± 0.0 17.40 - 12.00 29.4 70.6
4 C. harithaMangaly& M. Sabu 1136 4–5 4.2 ± 0.4 - - - - 16.80 - - 16.80 83.2
5 C. manggaValeton&Zijp 1049 4 4 ± 0.0 4–7 5.72 ± 1.1 5 5 ± 0.0 16.00 22.90 20.00 58.9 41.1
6 C. montanaRoxb. 649 4 4 ± 0.0 4–5 4.24 ± 0.4 - - 16.00 16.97 - 32.97 67.03
7 C. aeruginosaRoxb. 1144 6–8 6.48 ± 0.6 7 7 ± 0.0 2 2 ± 0.0 25.90 28.00 8.00 61.9 38.1
8 C. caesiaRoxb. 700 6–8 6.48 ± 0.6 - - 5 5 ± 0.0 25.90 - 20.00 45.9 54.1
9 C. latifoliaRoscoe 638 5–6 5.12 ±0.3 4–6 5.44 ±0.8 - - 20.50 21.76 - 42.26 54.24
10 C. leucorrhizaRoxb. 1169 6 6 ± 0.0 - - 4–6 5.44 ± 0.6 24.00 - 21.76 45.76 48.24
11 C. longa L. Pratibha 4–6 4.24 ± 0.7 - - 2 2 ± 0.0 16.96 - 8.00 24.96 75.04
12 C. sylvaticaValeton 526 5–6 5.08 ± 0.3 8 8 ± 0.0 - - 20.32 32.00 - 52.32 47.68
13 C. zanthorrhizaRoxb. 1108 3–4 3.48 ± 0.5 3–5 3.6 ± 0.8 4 4 ± 0.0 13.92 14.40 16.00 44.32 55.68
14 C. zedoaria (Christm.) Roscoe 760 4–6 5.12 ± 1.0 0–8 3.28 ± 2.4 3 3 ± 0.0 20.48 13.12 12.00 45.6 54.4
15 C. raktakantaMangalyand M. Sabu 1137 4–8 4.96 ± 0.7 4–8 5.72 ± 1.5 - - 19.84 22.90 - 42.74 57.26

Table 1: Specimen voucher and comparative heterochromatin banding pattern in Curcuma species.

Chromosome preparation

Actively growing root tips of 1-2 cm long were excised from field grown plants and were pretreated with saturated para-dichlorobenzene (HiMedia) for 3 hrs at room temperature and were subsequently fixed in freshly prepared 1:3 acetic acid/ethanol mixture for a minimum period of 24 hrs and thereafter stored in 70% ethanol.

CMA/DAPI staining

Fluorescent banding using CMA (excitation/emission wavelengths: 365-460/475-680 nm) and DAPI (excitation/emission wavelengths: 320-385/400-580 nm) which binds specifically to GC and AT - rich regions respectively, was performed according to method described by Schweizer and Ambros [26] with minor modifications. The fixed root tips digested in an enzymatic solution containing 2% cellulase (Onuzuka) and 2% pectolyase (Sigma) at 37°C for 30-60 mins. The hydrolyzed root tips were squashed in 45% acetic acid. Slides were frozen in liquid nitrogen and aged for 3 days at room temperature in the dark. The aged slides were stained with CMA (0.5 mg/ml) for 60 min and subsequently counterstained with DAPI (2 μg/ml) for 30 min. The slides were then mounted with an antifade solution containing in 1:1 (v/v) McIlvaine’s buffer (pH 7.0) supplemented with 2.5 mM MgCl2 and glycerol and kept for 2 days at 4°C for aging before observation under a fluorescence microscope with a different filter cassette for CMA and DAPI respectively. Photomicrographs for CMA/DAPI stained preparations were captured using Leica DFC310FX camera (Germany) attached to Leica Microsystems CMS GmbH fluorescent microscope at × 100 magnifications. An average of 25 cells was used in the present analysis.

Results

The present investigations revealed differential heterochromatin banding pattern in 15 Curcuma species. Detailed analysis using CMA/DAPI staining showed constitutive heterochromatin as bright green fluorescence scored as CMA+ (CMA positive), while bright blue fluorescence as DAPI+ (DAPI positive) and CMA+/DAPI+ (CMA and DAPI positive) where both CMA and DAPI show intermingled fluorescence signals and the data are illustrated in Figures 1-4 and summarized in Table 1.

medicinal-aromatic-plants

Figure 1: CMA/DAPI differential staining of chromosomes complements in Curcuma species. Yellow arrow indicates DAPI+, blue arrow indicates CMA+, and white arrow indicates CMA+ /DAPI+. A-C = C. aeruginosa; D-F = C. amada; G-I = C. aromatica; J-L = C. caesia. Scale bar = 5 μm in all the figures.

medicinal-aromatic-plants

Figure 2: CMA/DAPI differential staining of chromosomes complements in Curcuma species.Yellow arrow indicates DAPI+, blue arrow indicates CMA+, and white arrow indicates CMA+ /DAPI+. A-C = C. comosa; D­–F = C. haritha; G–I = C. latifolia; J–L = C. leucorrhiza. Scale bar = 5µm in all the figures.

medicinal-aromatic-plants

Figure 3: CMA/DAPI differential staining of chromosomes complements in Curcuma species. A–C = C. longa; D–F = C. mangga; G–I = C. montana; J–L = C. raktakanta. Yellow arrow indicates DAPI+, blue arrow indicates CMA+, white arrow indicates CMA+/DAPI+. Scale bar = 5 μm in all the figures.

medicinal-aromatic-plants

Figure 4: CMA/DAPI differential staining of chromosomes complements in Curcuma species. Yellow arrow indicates DAPI+, blue arrow indicates CMA+, and white arrow indicates CMA+ /DAPI+. A–C = C. sylvatica; D–F = C. zanthorrhiza; G–I = C. zedoaria. Scale bar = 5 μm in all the figures.

All species showed the presence of distinctive CMA+ banding pattern both at interphase and metaphase chromosomes. In most species CMA+ heterochromatin were located at the distal end of the chromosomes, however, one interstitial CMA+ heterochromatin region was also recorded in C. aromatica (Figure 1H), C. longa (Figure 3B), C. mangga (Figure 3E), C. caesia, C. comosa and C. leucorrhiza. In contrast, DAPI+ and CMA+/DAPI+ heterochromatin bands were mostly confined to the interstitial region (Figures 1C, 2G, 3G, 3F and 4G) of the chromosomes which varied in the number, size and location of the bands among the taxa.

A characteristic feature observed was the differential distribution of GC/AT- rich heterochromatin sites in the genome. The number of CMA+ binding sites ranged from 3.48 ± 0.5 (C. zanthorrhiza) to 6.48 ± 0.6 (C. aeruginosa and C. caesia) whereas that of DAPI+ sites ranged from 3.2 ± 2.5 (C. zedoaria) to 8 ± 0 (C. sylvatica) and that of CMA+/ DAPI+ ranged from a minimum of 2 ± 0 (C. aeruginosa and C. longa) to a high of 5 ± 0 (C. caesia and C. mangga).

Another distinctive feature of the heterochromatin distribution pattern is the amount of repetitive and non-repetitive fraction(s) of the DNA (Table 1). The total repetitive fraction(s) ranged from 16% (C. amada) to 61.9% (C. aeruginosa) which corresponds to GC-rich (16%, 25.90%), AT-rich (0%, 28%) and/or AT+GC rich (0%, 8%) respectively. It can be noted that the amount of AT-rich fraction(s) is slightly higher compared to the GC-rich fraction(s) in C. aeruginosa, C. aromatica, C. latifolia, C. mangga, C. raktakanta, C. sylvatica, and C. zanthorrhiza exception is the case of C. zedoaria where the GC-rich fraction(s) (20.48%) is more than as compared to AT-rich fraction(s) (13.12%). The non-repetitive DNA fraction(s) ranged from a minimum of 38.1% (C. aeruginosa) to 84% (C. amada).

Discussion

Fifteen species of Curcuma currently investigated differed 3.9- fold in the amount of repetitive and 3.8 fold in non-repetitive DNA fraction(s). This variation in the amount and type of repetitive and non-repetitive DNA fraction(s) among species may be attributed to the rapidly evolving nature of the heterochromatin [18] and might have contributed to the genome evolution in the genus Curcuma. Several hypotheses have been proposed to understand the nature of the heterochromatin comprising of repetitive sequences. Among them, unequal crossing over [27], polymerase slippage or massive insertions/ removal of mobile elements [28,29] is well recognized. Alternatively, changes in the epigenetic state of the chromatin, by losses or alterations of chromatin insulators [30], or by de novo insertion of few mobile elements may determine changes in the size of heterochromatic bands [31].

Heterochromatin is one of the most important factors in evolution [32], since it can interfere with phenomena such as DNA replication, chromosomal structure, gene expression and the cell cycle [9,33]. DAPI+ or CMA+ bands observed in many plant genera reveal the presence of AT- or GC-rich repetitive DNA sequences, respectively [19,34]. Hence, CMA positive (CMA+) segment is high in GC-content and DAPI positive (DAPI+) segment is high AT-content. Comparative studies of plant repetitive sequences are useful for investigating evolutionary relationships between plant species [35]. Banding pattern with base-specific fluorochromes (CMA and DAPI) of metaphase as well as interphase cells showed the presence of GC- and/or AT- rich heterochromatin and some consisted of both GC- and AT-rich combine repetitive sequences in all the species analyzed (Table 1; Figures 1-4).

The amount of AT-rich fraction(s) is comparatively higher as compared to the number of GC-rich heterochromatin repetitive fraction(s) with a 1.1- fold mean difference in the amount of AT to GCrich repetitive fractions. Similar observations have also been reported in other species as well [16,19,36,37]. However, a contrary status has also been reported in some species [38], which is also the case of C. zedoaria presently studied. Though the polymorphism can be observed in the amount, type and distribution of heterochromatin but the general patterns were relatively unique for each species studied as reported in Vigna [39,40], Citrus [41], Cestrum [42] and Abelmoschus [16].

Heterochromatin studies in the genus Curcuma provide clear information on genome constitution such as the repetitive sequence (GC, AT and GC/AT-rich) families. The variation in the amount and distribution of heterochromatin are characteristics with highest taxonomic value at the species level [43], leading to greater genome size [1]. The polymorphism of the heterochromatic-rich repetitive fractions advocates their important role in genome structure and function of the genus Curcuma. This variation reflects higher molecular organization of the genome and polyploidy might have contributed significantly to the species diversification. The repeated DNA sequences of the heterochromatin are subjected to rapid evolutionary changes [17]. Therefore, it may be opined that the species within the genus Curcuma may have different evolutionary pattern which was also supported by the findings from genome size estimation by Škorničková et al. [1]. The present work entails the importance heterochromatin rich-repetitive DNA sequences which can give significant insights into the genome structure and should be considered a useful tool for understanding the genome organization and evolutionary drift in the genus Curcuma. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), a powerful tool for chromosome analysis, may authentically substantiate genome structure, organization and distribution of repetitive DNA families, and could resolve some of the unknown aspects of polyploidy in the genus Curcuma.

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by DBT-JRF Program, Department of Biotechnology, Government of India (Fellowship Ref. No. DBT-JRF/2010-11/582 dated 27th January, 2011). The present work was carried out in the Department of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong. The authors are thankful to the Head of the Department for providing necessary facilities. The authors are also grateful to the Director, Indian Institute of Spices Research (IISR), Kozhikode for providing the germplasm, VA Parthasarathy and Dr. Prasath Duraisamy for their help and encouragement. Sincere thanks are also due to the members of Plant Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong for their constant help and encouragement.

References

  1. Leong-Skornicková J, Sída O, Jarolímová V, Sabu M, Fér T, et al. (2007) Chromosome numbers and genome size variation in Indian species of Curcuma (Zingiberaceae). Ann Bot 100: 505-526.
  2. Velayudhan KC, Muralidharan VK, Amalraj VA, Gautam PL, Mandal S, et al. (1999) Curcuma genetic resources. Scientific monograph No. 4. NBPGR, New Delhi.
  3. Islam MA (2004) Genetic diversity of the genus Curcuma in Bangladesh and further biotechnological approaches for in vitro regeneration and long-term conservation of C. longa germplasm. PhD Thesis, University of Hannover.
  4. Sasikumar B (2005) Genetic resources of Curcuma: Diversity, characterization and utilization. Plant Genetic Resources 3: 230-251.
  5. Velayudhan KC (2015) Ornamental Curcuma species in Western Ghats of India. Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources 28: 269-277.
  6. Syamkumar S, Sasikumar B (2007) Molecular marker based genetic diversity analysis of Curcuma species from India. ScientiaHorticulturae 112:235-241.
  7. Škornicková J, Sabu M (2005) Curcuma roscoeana Wall. (Zingiberaceae) in India. Gardens' Bulletin, Singapore 57: 187-198.
  8. Škornicková J, Šída O, Sabu M, Marhold K (2008) Taxonomic and nomenclatural puzzles in Indian Curcuma: the identity and nomenclatural history of C. zedoaria (Christm.) Roscoe and C. zerumbetRoxb. (Zingiberaceae). Taxon 57: 949-962.
  9. Stace CA (2000) Cytology and cytogenetics as a fundamental taxonomic resource for the 20thand 21stcenturies. Taxon 49: 451-477.
  10. Yashikane I, Naohiro N (1991) Karyotypes of Fragarianubicola and F. daltoniana. Cytologia 56: 453-457.
  11. Bennett MD, Leitch IJ (2005) Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms: progress, problems and prospects. Ann Bot 95: 45-90.
  12. Ramachandran K (1961) Chromosome numbers in the genus Curcuma Linn. Current Science 30: 194-196.
  13. Joseph R, Joseph T, Joseph J (1999) Karyomorphological studies in the genus Curcuma Linn. Cytologia 64: 313-317.
  14. Chen J, Xia NH (2010) Chromosome cytology, leaf epidermal morphology and palynology of Curcuma rubrobracteata (Zingiberaceae). Nordic Journal of Botany 28: 212-215.
  15. Paula AA, Fernandes T, Vignoli-Silva M, Vanzela ALL (2015) Comparative cytogenetic analysis of Cestrum (Solanaceae) reveals different trends in heterochromatin and rDNA sites distribution. Plant Biosystems 149: 976-983.
  16. Keisham M, Kattukunnel JJ, Yadav SR, Bhat KV, Rao SR (2015) Comparative analysis of heterochromatin distribution in wild and cultivated Abelmoschus species based on fluorescent staining methods. Protoplasma 252: 657-664.
  17. Cuadrado A, Cardoso M, Jouve N (2008) Physical organisation of simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in Triticeae: structural, functional and evolutionary implications. Cytogenet Genome Res 120: 210-219.
  18. Hughes SE, Hawley RS (2009) Heterochromatin: a rapidly evolving species barrier. PLoSBiol 7: e1000233.
  19. Guerra M (2000) Patterns of heterochromatin distribution in plant chromosomes. Genetics and Molecular Biology 23: 1029-1041.
  20. Timmis JN, Ingle J, Sinclair J, Jones RN (1975) Genomic quality of rye B chromosomes. Journal of Experimental Botany 26: 367-378.
  21. Schweizer D, Nagl W (1976) Heterochromatin diversity in Cymbidium, and its relationship to differential DNA replication. Exp Cell Res 98: 411-423.
  22. Guerra M (1993) Cytogenetics of Rutaceae. V. High chromosomal variability in Citrus species revealed by CMA/DAPI staining. Heredity 71: 234-241.
  23. Alam SS, Azhar SS, Sarker RH, Zaman MA (1998) Karyotype analysis with differential banding in Crinum pratense and Crinum defixum. Cytologia 63: 223-227.
  24. Ahmed L, Begum R, Noor SS, Zaman MA, Alam SS (2004) Reversible fluorescent chromosome banding in three Crinum spp. (Amaryllidaceae). Cytologia 69: 69-74.
  25. Sultana S, Rahman RB, Alam SS (2006) Karyotype analysis in three morphological forms of Lasiaspinosa (L.) Thwaites, (Araceae). Cytologia 71: 359-364.
  26. Schweizer D, Ambros PF (1994) Chromosome banding: staining combinations for specific regions. In: Gosden JR (ed) Methods in molecular biology. Chromosome analysis protocols. Humana, Totowa, NJ.
  27. Bennett MD, Gustafson JP, Smith JB (1977) Variation in nuclear DNA in the genus Secale. Chromosoma 61: 149-176.
  28. Loidl J (1983) Some features of heterochromatin in wild Allium species. Plant Systematics and Evolution 143: 117-131.
  29. Schubert I, Wobus U (1985) In situ hybridization confirms jumping nucleolus organizing regions in Allium. Chromosoma 92: 143-148.
  30. Dorman ER, Bushey AM, Corces VG (2007) The role of insulator elements in large-scale chromatin structure in interphase. Semin Cell DevBiol 18: 682-690.
  31. Slotkin RK, Martienssen R (2007) Transposable elements and the epigenetic regulation of the genome. Nat Rev Genet 8: 272-285.
  32. Edelman JR, Lin YJ (1995) Repetitive DNA/heterochromatin: can it be the “driving force” of evolution and speciation? Cytobios 83: 117-127.
  33. Redi CA, Garagna S, Zacharias H, Zuccotti M, Capanna E (2001) The other chromatin. Chromosoma 110: 136-147.
  34. Schweizer D (1981) Counterstain-enhanced chromosome banding. Hum Genet 57: 1-14.
  35. Kamm A, Galasso I, Schmidt T, Heslop-Harrison JS (1995) Analysis of a repetitive DNA family from Arabidopsis arenosa and relationships between Arabidopsis species. Plant MolBiol 27: 853-862.
  36. Schweizer D (1976) Reverse fluorescent chromosome banding with chromomycin and DAPI. Chromosoma 58: 307-324.
  37. Moscone EA, Lambrou M, Ehrendorfer F (1996) Fluorescent chromosome banding in the cultivated species of Capsicum (Solanaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 202: 37-63.
  38. Roser M (1994) Pathways of karyological differentiation in palms (Arecaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 189: 83-122.
  39. Galasso I, Saponetti LS, Pignone D (1996) Cytotaxonomic studies in Vigna II. Chromosomal distribution and reacting properties of the heterochromatin in five wild species of the section Vigna. Caryologia 49: 311-319.
  40. Shamurailatpam A, Madhavan L, Yadav SR, Bhat KV, Rao SR (2015) Heterochromatin characterization through differential fluorophore binding pattern in some species of VignaSavi. Protoplasma 252: 629-635.
  41. Miranda M, Ikeda F, Endo T, Moriguchi T, Omura M (1997) Comparative analysis on the distribution of heterochromatin in Citrus, Poncirus and Fortunella chromosomes. Chromosome Res 5: 86-92.
  42. Fregonezi JN, Fernandes T, Torezan JMD, Vieira AOS, Vanzela ALL (2006) Karyotype differentiation of four Cestrum species (Solanaceae) based on physical mapping of repetitive DNA. Genetics and Molecular Biology 29: 97-104.
  43. Chalup L, Samoluk SS, Neffa VS, Seijo G, et al. (2015) Karyotype characterization and evolution in South American species of Lathyrus (Notolathyrus, Leguminosae) evidenced by heterochromatin and rDNA mapping. J Plant Res 128: 893-908.
Citation: Lamo JM, Wahlang DR, Rao SR (2016) Comparative Analysis of Heterochromatin Distribution Pattern in Wild and Cultivated Species of Curcuma L. Med Aromat Plants S3:006.

Copyright: © 2016 Lamo JM, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top