ISSN: 2155-9570
Research Article - (2017) Volume 8, Issue 3
Background: Cataract extraction affects some of the anterior chamber (AC) parameters like AC depth (ACD) and the width of the AC angle. Different techniques are used to evaluate these effects before and after cataract extraction.
Purpose: To evaluate the results of Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography (AS-OCT), Ultrasound Biomicroscopy (UBM) & Pentacam in evaluating the changes of the anterior segment parameters after cataract extraction.
Methods: Prospective non-randomized study including 40 cataractous eyes. AS-OCT, UBM and Pentacam were done 1 week before, 1 week and 1 month after phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, to measure ACD, AC angle width, and central corneal thickness (CCT).
Results: ACD depth, AC angle width and CCT increased significantly 1 week and 1 month after surgery than the preoperative level (p<0.001), with no significant difference between 1 week and 1 month after surgery (p>0.05). No significant difference between the 3 techniques in most measures either pre- or postoperatively.
Conclusion: ACD, AC angle width and CCT are significantly increased after uneventful phacoemulsification surgery and Foldable IOL implantation, which have become stabilized after 1 month of surgery with no significant difference in the measures given by AS-OCT, UBM or Pentacam.
Keywords: Anterior segment OCT; UBM; Pentacam; Phacoemulsification; AC Angle; Corneal thickness
Cataract and various lens disorders are well known to cause changes in the anterior chamber of the eye, especially the angle and affecting the intraocular pressure. One of these effects is the narrowing of the angle which may sometimes proceed to angle closure either in acute, subacute or chronic forms [1,2]. This happens because of the equatorial age-related growth of the lens which makes the suspensory ligament slackens and the lens moves anteriorly [3]. Phacoemulsification for cataract or even lens extraction with IOL implantation in eyes with narrow angle can reduce the intraocular pressure (IOP), open the iridocorneal angles and deepen the anterior chamber [3-10].
In the traditional clinical settings, direct visualization of the iridocorneal angle can be done by some diagnostic contact lenses; such as the Goldmann 3-mirror lens. The evolution of some new investigations for the anterior segment of the eye like anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), ultrasound biomicroscopy and pentacam, makes it possible to objectively evaluate the structures of anterior segment of the eye, the iridocorneal angle now can be objectively fully investigated and well-assessed [12,13].
AS-OCT acts through using light of long wavelength (1,310 nm) which gives images of high resolution for the anterior segment of the eye in a non-invasive and non-contact way. It is a rapid technique and provides quantitative analysis of different ocular structures. It also has repeatability and reproducibility because of its low intraobserver and interobserver variability [14-17].
The limitation of AS-OCT technique is its limited penetration of the iris due to the presence of pigmented epithelium. This limitation makes the obtaining of accurate images for structures behind this pigmented epithelium (ciliary body, lens and zonules) are difficult [15].
Ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) can give images of highresolution and good quality for anterior segment including iridocorneal angle and ciliary body which are not visible with ordinary gonioscopy [14,16,18]. The major disadvantage of the UBM technique is that the transducer requires immersion of the eye in a water bath of saline with the patient in the supine position. This makes the procedure uncomfortable for the patients and needs a skilled examiner, the Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam), which uses a slit beam and a camera, is a non-invasive technique and can be repeated easily but it does not allow visualization of the actual angle and its images need to be well processed because of its optical and acoustic nature [18-20].
This study aimed to evaluate the results of AS-OCT, UBM & Pentacam in evaluating the changes of the anterior segment parameters after Phacoemulsification with IOL implantation.
A prospective non-randomized study included 40 eyes of 40 patients who underwent uneventful phacoemulsification surgery and IOL implantation. This study has been obtained an ethical agreement from the medical ethics committee at faculty of medicine, Tanta University.
All the eyes had preoperative full ophthalmological evaluation. The intraocular pressure (IOP) was assessed by Goldmann applanation tonometer. All measurements were obtained under standard dim light conditions and without dilation.
Preoperative exclusion criteria were any eye with corneal pathology, high myopia >6 diopter (D) or axial length >26 mm, IOP abnormalities, lens abnormalities like pseudo exfoliation, uveitis, previous eye surgery or eye trauma, posterior segment pathology, systemic illness that affect the angle like diabetes, those using topical or systemic medications that might influence anterior segment parameters and IOP measurements. Eyes with intraoperative or postoperative complications that can affect the angle or the IOP were also excluded from the study.
Anterior segment OCT (AS-OCT), Pentacam and UBM imaging were obtained for all the included eyes 1 week before, 1 week and one month after phaco-surgery to evaluate Anterior chamber depth (ACD), nasal and temporal angle changes, and to measure corneal thickness.
OCT Images of the anterior segment were obtained using a (Topcon 3D OCT 2000 Fa plus, Japan) device. All the images were taken in the same dark conditions (0-1 lux by digital light meter with patients in a sitting position. After several scans were acquired, the operator selected the best image with no motion artifacts or image artifacts from the eyelids.
UBM examination was performed with VuMAXTM (Sonomed Escalon, USA) using the company water path probe and 35 MHz transducer. All patients were examined in supine position. After application of topical anesthesia, a plastic eye cup was placed gently on the globe and then filled with balanced saline solution. Sulcus to sulcus axial scan passing through the center of the pupil was obtained for every patient to measure the central corneal thickness and central ACD. After selecting angle scan preset mode of the device software, radial scans through the nasal and temporal AC angles with the probe marker directed away from the limbus were obtained to measure angle opening distance at 500 μm, which is calculated automatically by the device software after manually selected scleral spur position.
The Pentacam system (Oculizer II, wavelight) is based on an 180° rotating Scheimpflug camera which can take 12-50 single images to reconstruct the anterior chamber. After completing a scan, Pentacam software constructs the 3-dimensional image of the anterior segment and calculates the anterior chamber parameters.
All surgeries were performed by the same experienced surgeon (AG) in the same hospital and with the same settings of the phacomachine (WhiteStar Signature Phacoemulsification System, Abbott Medical Optics) and the same type of foldable IOL (Sensar; Advanced Medical Optics, Inc., Santa Ana, CA, USA).
Statistical analysis of the collected data
Results were collected, tabulated and statistically analyzed by an IBM compatible personal computer with SPSS statistical package version 20 (SPSS Inc. Released 2011. IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 20.0, Armnok, NY: IBM Corp.) Data was expressed in: Number (No), percentage (%) mean (¯x) and standard deviation (SD). ANOVA test was used for comparison of quantitative variables between more than two groups of normally distributed data with LSD test as post Hoc test while; Kruskal Wallis test was used for comparison of quantitative variables between more than two groups of not normal distributed data with Tamhane’s test as post hoc test. Repeated measures ANOVA test was used for comparison of quantitative variables between more than two consecutive measures in the same group of normally distributed data and Friedman test was used for comparison of quantitative variables between more than two consecutive measures in the same group of not- normally distributed data with LSD test as post Hoc test. P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
40 eyes of 40 patients with uneventful phacoemulsification surgery were the subjects of this study. The mean age of the studied patients were 51.22 ± 5.46 years. 22 (55%) eyes belonged to male patients, while the rest of the eyes belonged to female ones.
The postoperative measures of A.C. depth showed significant increase from the preoperative measure by all the used techniques. However, this increase was stabilized after 1st week from the surgery as there was no significant difference between the A.C depth at 1st week and 1st month after surgery. By using AS-OCT, the mean preoperative AC depth was 2.25 ± 0.9 mm, which was significantly increased to at 3.65 ± 0.89 mm at 1st week and 4.06 ± 1.01 mm at 1st month postoperative (P<0.001). By using UBM, the mean preoperative AC depth was 3.02 ± 0.82 mm, which was significantly increased to at 4.05 ± 0.99 mm at 1st week and 4.41 ± 0.75 mm at 1st month postoperative (P<0.001), and by using the Pentacam, the mean preoperative AC depth was 3.19 ± 0.93 mm, which was significantly increased to at 4.09 ± 0.84 mm at 1st week and 4.45 ± 0.88 mm at 1st month postoperative (P<0.001).
When comparing the 3 techniques, there was no significant difference between them regarding AC depth at different time measures except that AS-OCT gives lower preoperative AC depth (2.25 ± 0.9) than both the UBM (3.02 ± 0.82) and pentacam (3.19 ± 0.93) with p<0.001 (Table 1).
Technique | Preop. Mean ± SD |
1st w postop Mean ± SD |
1st postop. Mean ± SD |
Repeated measures ANOVA | P value | Post Hoc |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS-OCT | 2.25 ± 0.9 | 3.65 ± 0.89 | 4.06 ± 1.01 | 41.21* | <0.001 | P1<0.001 |
P2<0.001 | ||||||
P3<0.06 | ||||||
UBM | 3.02 ± 0.82 | 4.05 ± 0.99 | 4.41 ± 0.75 | 28.19 | <0.001 | P1<0.001 |
P2<0.001 | ||||||
P3<0.07 | ||||||
Pentacam | 3.19 ± 0.93 | 4.09 ± 0.84 | 4.45 ± 0.88 | 21.55 | <0.001 | P1<0.001 P2<0.001 |
P3<0.06 | ||||||
F test | 10.30** | 2.86 | 2.34 | ----- | ------ | ------- |
P value | <0.001 | 0.06 | 0.10 | ------ | ------- | ------- |
Post Hoc | P4<0.001 | ------ | ----- | |||
P5<0.001 | ||||||
P6>0.05 | ||||||
*Freidman test ** Kruskal wallis test |
Table 1: Comparison between the mean A.C. depth (mm) values preoperatively, 1st week and 1st month postoperatively.
P1 for comparison between preop. and 1st week postop., P2 for comparison between preop., and 1st month postop., P3 for comparison between 1st week and 1st month postop., P4 for comparison between AS-OCT and UBM, P5 for comparison between AS-OCT and pentacam and P6 for comparison between UBM and pentacam.
All the 3 techniques showed significant widening of the angle at the 1st week after surgery which become stable and did not differ significantly when measured at the 1st month after surgery. AS-OCT showed significant widening of the angle from 28.29 ± 4.21° to 34.20 ± 3.65° at the 1st week and 33.91° ± 4.21° at the 1st postoperative month. By UBM, the angled changed from 27.99 ± 3.89° preoperatively to 34.47 ± 4.02° and 34.13 ± 4.30° at 1st week and 1st month postoperative respectively. Pentacam showed the same results as the angle changed from 28.01° ± 3.76° preoperative to 33.91 ± 3.90° and 33.90 ± 3.87° at 1st week and 1st month postoperative respectively. There was no significant difference between the 3 techniques in angle measurements at each time measure (Table 2).
Investigation | Preop Mean ± SD |
1st w postop Mean ± SD |
1st m postop. Mean ± SD |
Repeated measures ANOVA | P value | Post Hoc |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS-OCT | 28.29 ± 4.21 | 34.20 ± 3.65 | 33.91 ± 4.21 | 27.30 | <0.001 | P1<0.001 |
P2<0.001 | ||||||
P3<0.74 | ||||||
UBM | 27.99 ± 3.89 | 34.47 ± 4.02 | 34.13 ± 4.30 | 32.06 | <0.001 | P1<0.001 |
P2<0.001 | ||||||
P3<0.71 | ||||||
Pentacam | 28.01 ± 3.76 | 33.91 ± 3.90 | 33.90 ± 3.87 | 31.36 | <0.001 | P1 <0.001 |
P2<0.001 | ||||||
P3<0.99 | ||||||
F test | 0.07 | 0.21 | 0.04 | ----- | ------ | ------- |
P value | 0.93 | 0.81 | 0.96 | ------ | ------- | ------- |
P1 for comparison between preop. and 1st week postop. , P2 for comparison between preop., and 1st month postop., P3 for comparison between 1st week and 1st month postop. |
Table 2: Comparison between the mean angle width preoperatively, 1st week and 1st month postoperative.
Regarding the central corneal thickness (CCT), it showed the same trend of the A.C depth. The postoperative measures of CCT showed significant increase from the preoperative measure by the 3 used techniques and showed stabilization after the 1st week from the surgery as there was no significant difference between the CCT at 1st week and 1st month after surgery. By using AS-OCT, the mean preoperative CCT was 512.0 ± 20.18 μm , which was significantly increased to at 545.03 ± 27.90 μm at 1st week and 540.71 ± 30.4 μm at 1st month postoperative (P value of <0.001). By using UBM, the mean preoperative CCT was 519.7 ± 18.91 μm, which was significantly increased to at 545.12 ± 28.7 μm at 1st week and 539.42 ±28.13 μm at 1st month postoperative (P value of <0.001), and by using the Pentacam, the mean preoperative CCT was 517.8 ± 21.71 μm, which was significantly increased to at 547.84 ± 26.3 μm at 1st week and 538.1 ± 29.4 μm at 1st month postoperative (P<0.001).
Again, when comparing the 3 techniques, there was no significant difference between them regarding CCT at different time measures (p value>0.05) (Table 3 and Figures 1-6).
Investigation | Preop Mean ± SD |
1st w postop Mean ± SD |
1st m postop. Mean ± SD |
Repeated measures ANOVA | P value | Post Hoc |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS-OCT | 512.0 ± 20.18 | 545.03 ± 27.90 | 540.71 ± 30.4 | 18.33 | <0.001 | P1 <0.001 |
P2<0.001 | ||||||
P3 0.50 | ||||||
UBM | 519.7 ± 18.91 | 545.12 ± 28.7 | 539.42 ± 28.13 | 10.82 | <0.001 | P1 <0.001 |
P2 <0.001 | ||||||
P3 0.17 | ||||||
Pentacam | 517.8 ± 21.71 | 547.84 ± 26.3 | 538.1 ± 29.4 | 13.9 | <0.001 | P1 <0.001 |
P2 <0.001 | ||||||
P3 0.12 | ||||||
F test | 1.56 | 0.13 | 0.07 | ----- | ------ | ------- |
P value | 0.21 | 0.87 | 0.92 | ------ | ------- | ------- |
P1 for comparison between preop. and 1st week postop. , P2 for comparison between preop., and 1st month postop., P3 for comparison between 1st week and 1st month postop. |
Table 3: Comparison between the mean central corneal thicknesses (CCT) values\ preoperatively, 1st week and 1st month postoperative.
After cataract extraction some changes occur in the anterior segment of the eye, mainly change in the AC depth and the iridocorneal angle.
In the current study, with all the 3 different techniques used, the AC depth showed significant increase in the first postoperative week than the preoperative level (p<0.001). There was no significant difference between the AC depth at 1st week and 1st month after surgery (p>0.05).
This goes very well with many researchers. Junejo et al. [21] studied a total of 74 subjects with overall preoperative ACD was 3.02 ± 0.43which increased to 3.46 ± 0.44 after 1 day of cataract surgery, then 3.64 ± 0.46 after 1 week and after 1 month of surgery it reached 3.81 ± 0.46 with significant increase from the preoperative level (p<0.001). They concluded that "after uneventful phacoemulsification along with IOL implantation, the anterior chamber angle depth increased markedly".
The same was reported by Kim et al. [22]. They found that angle opening distance (AOD), trabecular iris surface area (TISA), and trabecular- iris angle (TIA) increased significantly after cataract surgery and showed positive correlation with ACA. They studied Forty-five eyes underwent AS-OCT imaging in order to evaluate anterior chamber configuration before and 2 days after phacoemulsification and IOL implantation and found that the postoperative central ACD increased to 4.14 ± 0.31 mm (p<0.001).
Doganay et al. [23] studied the AC depth in 42 eyes which were evaluated preoperatively, and at 1, 3 and 6 months after cataract surgery using the Pentacam. The mean preoperative ACD measurements were 2.79 ± 0.42 mm which increased significantly to 4.41 ± 0.45 mm, 4.63± 0.57 mm and 4.65 ± 0.32 mm at 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively, respectively (p<0.05).
The widening of the iridocorneal angle is the main change occurs in the anterior segment of the eye after cataract extraction. This was evident in this study as the angle widened significantly at the 1st week of surgery than the preoperative measure (p<0.001). The angle then kept widened till the 1st month after surgery with no significant difference from the 1st week after surgery.
Kim et al. reported the same conclusion in the year 2011 [22]. In their study, before surgery, the mean anterior chamber angle widths were 23.21 ± 6.70° in the nasal quadrant and 24.89 ± 7.66° in the temporal quadrant which increased significantly to 35.16 ± 4.65° in the nasal quadrant (p=0.001) and 36.03 ± 4.86° in the temporal quadrant (p=0.001). Also, Doganay et al. [23], found the mean anterior chamber angle (ACA) measurements were 33 ± 6° preoperatively changed to 42 ± 7°, 44 ± 7° and 43 ± 6° at 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively, respectively. The differences between pre and postoperative ACA measurements were statistically significant (p<0.05).
Huang et al. [13] studied 26 eyes classified as having narrow angle (NA). They measured the angle width, ACD and IOP before and 6 months after surgery. They found the mean (SD) angle opening distance 500 μm (AOD500) anterior to scleral spur and ACD in were (in Shaffer grading) 0.179 (0.014) mm and 2.23 (0.07) mm, respectively which changed to 0.389 (0.025) mm and 3.75 (0.05) mm 6 months after surgery, respectively with significant reduction in IOP.
Shin et al. [24] found a significant increase in ACD and a significant reduction in IOP (p<0.01) after cataract surgery when they compared non-glaucomatous eyes with open angles or with occludable angles. This deepening in the AC was inversely related to preoperative ACD in the occludable-angle group (P<0.01).
This study showed significant increase in the CCT in the 1st week after lens extraction (p<0.001), then start to decrease afterwards but with no significant difference when measured at the 1st postoperative months (p>0.05). This happened with the 3 different used methods of measurement with no significant difference between them.
This was in agreement to Cetinkaya et al. [25] in their retrospective study, who found the Preoperative mean CCT value was 550.89 ± 20.07 μm. The increase that happened in CCT values of 1st week and 1st month after surgery was statistically significant, but those of 3rd month, 6th month, 1st year and 2nd year were not significant.
However, this was different to what was stated by Doganay et al. [23], who found no difference between preoperative and postoperative CCT. They found the mean CCT measurements were 534 ± 34 μm preoperatively and 528 ± 35 μm, 528 ± 36 μm and 538 ± 37 μm at 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively, respectively. The differences between pre- and postoperative CCT measurements were not statistically significant (p>0.05).
Cetinkaya et al. [25], when retrospectively studied 112 eyes with cataract and ocular hypertension found that the increase in ACD of the 1st week, 1st, 3rd, 6th month, and 1st year after surgery was statistically significant, however, at the 2nd year it was not. Preoperative mean iridocorneal angle value was Grade 2.85 ± 0.75 (2-4) according to Shaffer classification. The increase in iridocorneal angle values of the 1st week, 1st month, 3rd month, 6th month, and 1st year was statistically significant, but that of the 2nd year was not significant.
Baxant et al. [26], studied 170 eyes of 119 patients undergoing phacoemulsification, followed by PC-IOL implantation. They observed a significant increase of ACD, ACV and ACA of patients and mostly in the PACG group (p<0.05) at the 3rd week and 3rd month after surgery.
AS-OCT & UBM & Pentacam demonstrated increase of AC depth, angle width and CCT at 1st week after uneventful phacoemulsification surgery and Foldable IOL implantation, which have become stabilized at 1st month after surgery with no significant differences between the 3 used techniques.