Journal of Thermodynamics & Catalysis

Journal of Thermodynamics & Catalysis
Open Access

ISSN: 2157-7544

+44 1300 500008

Research Article - (2016) Volume 7, Issue 3

Cu or Fe Modified Cs2HPMo12O40 as Catalysts for Selective Oxidation of Methacrolein

Shuo Wang1,2*, Xiaofang Liu1 and Lilong Zhou2
1Faculty of Bioresource Sciences, Akita Prefectural University, Kaidobata-Nishi 241-438, Shimoshinjo-Nakano, Akita-shi, Akita 010-0195, Japan
2Beijing Key Laboratory of Ionic Liquids Clean Processes, Key Laboratory of Green Processes and Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Complex Systems Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, PR China
*Corresponding Author: Shuo Wang, Faculty of Bioresource Sciences, Akita Prefectural University, Kaidobata-Nishi 241-438, Shimoshinjo-Nakano, Akita-shi, Akita 010-0195, Japan, Tel: 8618637884174 Email:

Abstract

The Cu2+ or Fe3+ substituted Cs2HPMo12O40 was synthesized to study the effect of transitional metal cations on selective catalytic oxidation of methacrolein by polyoxometalates. Adding of Cu2+ could reduce acidity and enhance oxidizing ability of the catalyst. The catalytic experiments showed that the addition small amount of Cu2+ to the catalyst could increase the conversion of methacrolein from 65% to 96% and the selectivity to methacrylic acid to 55%, at 300-340°C. It is found adding of Cu2+ could promote the reduction process of catalysts should be the main reason of the performance enhancement. Adding of Fe3+ to the catalyst could induce some new weak acidic sites due to the formation of iron aqua complexes. Whereas, Fe3+ had no significant effect on redox ability of the catalyst. The conversion of methacrolein could reach 96% with the existence of Fe3+. However, the addition of Fe3+ had no significant effect on selectivity to methacrylic acid.

Keywords: Methacrolein (MAL), Polyoxometaltes (POMs), Copper, Iron, Catalysis

Introduction

Methacrylic acid (MAA) is an important mediate chemical for producing methyl methacrylate, which can be used to synthesize polymethylmethacrylate, other derivatives for coatings, PVC modifier and so on. To date, POMs with the so-called Keggin structure, especially the cesium salts of 12-molybdophosphoric acid, have been proved to be a good catalyst for selective oxidation of MAL to MAA [1- 10]. Cesium salts of 12-molybdophosphoric acid present an organized three-level structure. The primary structure is also known as Keggin structure consists of [PMo12O40]3- heteropolyanion, a central atom P bonding with four O atoms forming a PO4 tetrahedron, which is surrounded with twelve MoO6 octahedra. The secondary structure is composed of the heteropolyanion, counterions, crystalline water, and other additional molecules. The tertiary structure relates to the particle size, pore structure, the distribution of protons in the particles. Former researches indicate that POMs can be applied in both acidic and redox-catalyzed reactions, and their acidic and redox properties can be finely tuned by choosing constituent elements or counter cations [11,12]. The effect of counter cations on performance of POM catalyst had been extensively studied. Stytsenko et al. [1] found that cesium defines the acidity and specific area, vanadium controls the selectivity, and the transition metals define the mobility of oxygen in the bulk and the catalytic activity. Some other studies have pointed that the addition of copper and iron as counter cations into the POMs-catalysts can improve catalytic performance, as copper and iron play an important role in the redox processes [13,14]. Langpape et al. [15] found that the Cu2+/Cu redox couple could enhance the redox of the solids when protons were substituted by copper cations. The same effect of Fe was also confirmed [3]. In our former works, we found Cu and Fe co-doped acidic cesium salts of molybdovanadophosphoric acids could improve the redox properties and thereby enhance the catalytic behavior during the vapor-phase selective oxidation of MAL to MAA [7]. As a most simple and effective catalyst for selective oxidation of MAL to MAA, Cs2HPMo12O4, the effect of Cu and Fe doping on this catalyst is still parse and ambiguous. In order to clarify the effects of Cu and Fe modification on Cs2HPMo12O40 for selective oxidation of MAL, two series of catalysts with general formula Cs2CuxH1-2xPMo12O40 and Cs2FexH1-3xPMo12O40 (x=0.0-0.3) have been prepared and characterized. The catalytic performances of these two series catalysts were investigated at different reaction temperature. It is found that doping of both Cu and Fe can increase the catalytic performance of Cs2HPMo12O4, but with different mechanism.

Experiment

Preparation of the samples

A conventional method was utilized to prepare the Cs2HPMo12O40 (Cs2H). 1.62 g Cs2CO3 (TP. 99%, Hubei, Baijierui Advanced Materials Co. Ltd.) and 11.36 g H3PMo12O40 (AR, Shanghai, Huayi (Group) Company) were dissolved in deionized water to form an aqueous solution, respectively. Then the Cs2CO3 aqueous solution was dropped into H3PMo12O40 aqueous solution at 50°C. The precipitate rapidly generated and aged for 5 h. The precipitate was separated by centrifugation, washed with deionized water and dried in va

cuum oven at 50°C. The iron- and copper-containing cesium salts of 12-phosphomolybdic acid, simplified as Cs2Cux catalysts and Cs2Fex catalysts (x=0.05-0.3), were prepared by the same procedure. Certain amount of Cu(OH)2 or Fe(OH)3 was added into the aqueous solution of 12-molybdophosphoric acid to get clear solution before the addition of Cs2CO3 aqueous solution. Then the precipitate was collected by filtration, washed with water and dried in an oven. The calcination was carried out at 350°C under synthetic air atmosphere for 12 h. The obtained samples were crushed and sieved as 0.38-0.55 mm to be tested as catalysts for selective oxidation of MAL to MAA.

Characterization techniques

Elemental composition of catalysts was confirmed by atomic emission for Mo, Cu, Fe, Cs, and P using the Shimadzu Multitype ICP Emission Spectrometer (ICPE-9000). FT-IR spectra of the samples were recorded by a Thermo Nicolet FT-IR 380 with anhydrous KBr as standard to confirm the primary Keggin structure of these samples. Raman spectra of the samples obtained by using a laser Raman (HR800 UV, Horiba Scientific Co., Ltd.) with a 100 mV laser, equipped with a wavelength of 514 nm and CCD detector. X-ray diffraction (XRD) data were recorded on a Rigaku Smart Lab X-ray powder diffractometer operated at an accelerating voltage of 45 kV and an emission current of 200 mA with Cu Kα radiation. The surface structure of samples was studied by SEM on a SU8020 SEM instrument (Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation). The NH3-TPD and the H2-TPR measurements were carried out on a Micromeritics Autochem II 2920 apparatus. In the NH3-TPD experiment, 50 mg of the sample was pre-treated under helium flow (20 mL·min-1) at 150°C for 1 h. Then, samples cooling to 50°C were treated under an atmosphere of 10% NH3-He flow, and the desorption profile was recorded in flowing helium at a heating rate of 10°C·min-1 to 650°C. The TPR analysis was carried out in a 10% H2-Ar flow at a heating rate of 10°C·min-1 to 650°C until the baseline was stable.

Selective catalytic oxidation of MAL to MAA

Catalytic experiments were performed in a fixed-bed reactor under atmospheric pressure. 0.8 g of catalyst was loaded into the constant temperature zone of a stainless steel tubular reactor, and quartz sand (0.38-0.55 mm) was used to fill the leaving space of the reactor. The composition of reaction gas at a flow rate of 150 mL·min-1 was a mole ratio of MAL: O2: N2: H2O=1: 2.5: 15: 8. Before reaction, the temperature was raised to reaction temperature and the gaseous reactants were delivered into the reactor. The inside temperature of the reactor was showed by a temperature indicator. The reaction products were gathered and analyzed using the internal standard method and ethanol as the internal standard. Analytical equipment we used by an Agilent 6820 gas chromatograph equipped with an FID detector using a DB-624 capillary column.

Results and Discussion

FT-IR analysis

Figure 1 showed the FT-IR of the prepared catalysts recorded between 1200 and 700 cm-1. Four strong characteristic peaks were found in the spectra of all samples which are attributed to the vibration bands of Keggin structure. The Keggin ion bands were observed at 1066 cm-1 for νas(POa) vibration, 962 cm-1 for terminal νas(Mo=Od) vibration, 870 and 801 cm-1 for νas(Mo-Ob-Mo) and νas(Mo-Oc-Mo), respectively [16,17]. Comparison of the FT-IR of the catalyst before and after calcination, little difference was observed, indicating the prepared catalyst reserved the Keggin structure after reaction with Cu or Fe cations.

thermodynamics-catalysis-FT-IR-uncalcinated-calcinated

Figure 1: FT-IR of uncalcinated and calcinated catalysts with different composition. (a) uncalcinated Cs2Cux catalysts; (b) calcinated Cs2Cux catalysts; (c) uncalcinated Cs2Fex catalysts; (d) calcinated Cs2Fex catalysts.

Raman analysis

Raman spectra further confirmed the structure of the catalysts. As shown in Figures 2a and 2c, before calcination, the catalysts exhibited main bands that attributed to Keggin structure. The split bands in the region 220-270 cm-1 were caused by the deformation vibrations of the terminal M=O groups and the entire framework [18,19]. Bands at 605 and 890 cm-1 were assigned to Mo-Oc-Mo and Mo-Ob-Mo vibration bands, respectively. Bands at 984 cm-1 (shoulder) and 999 cm-1 were assigned to Mo=Od stretching bands [20,21]. After calcination, the main bands of Keggin structure were still reserved (Figures 2b and 2d). According to Raman spectra and FT-IR, the Keggin structure kept integral after calcination. In addition, it is also observed that the Raman spectra showed little difference for different composition of cations. For Cs2Cux, only a small band appeared at 940 cm-1 after calcination, which can be assigned to copper oxide [CuOX](2-2x)+ [22]. In comparison, Cs2Fex had almost the same bands indicating Cs2Fex was more stable at high temperature. Additionally, no characteristic peak assigned to MoO3 was observed in all the samples, suggesting the prepared catalyst was not decomposed during preparation process.

thermodynamics-catalysis-Raman-spectra

Figure 2: Raman spectra of (a) uncalcinated Cs2Cux catalysts; (b) calcinated Cs2Cux catalysts; (c) uncalcinated Cs2Fex catalysts, (d) calcinated Cs2Fex catalysts.

XRD analysis

XRD patterns of the samples were given in Figure 3. The XRD patterns of Cs2Cux and Cs2Fex catalysts exhibited a single cubic structure of Keggin-type HPCs (PDF No.46-0481). According to previous studies, the cubic phase only formed for salts with more than two cesium atoms [4]. In addition, the addition of Cu and Fe cations did not affect the fundamental crystal structure of the heteropoly compounds as previously reported by Deng et al. [23]. Comparison between Figures 3a and 3b, there is little difference in XRD for all the prepared catalyst before and after calcination indicating the crystal structure of the catalyst does not vary significantly after calcination. Additionally, no peak from orthorhombic MoO3 (PDF No. 35076) was observed in all the samples. Hence, the results further confirmed the prepared catalyst kept stable and did not decompose.

thermodynamics-catalysis-XRD-patterns

Figure 3: XRD patterns of (a) before calcination; (b) after calcination.

The crystalline sizes of the prepared catalyst were calculated by Scherrer equation. Figure 4 depicted the crystalline sizes of catalysts before and after calcination. Before calcination, crystalline sizes of Cs2Cux and Cs2Fex keep constant at about 16-19 nm. After calcination, both the crystalline sizes of Cs2Cux and Cs2Fex increased significantly. Doping small amount of Cu or Fe can further increase the crystalline size of the catalyst. However, the crystalline size decreased when more content of Cu or Fe was added in the catalyst. SEM of the catalyst with different compositions confirmed such decrease trend. As shown in Figures 5a and 5b, for Cs2Cux, when x value increased from 0.1 to 0.3, the mean particle size decreased from 31 nm to 28 nm. This trend is more obviously for Cs2Fex, as shown in Figures 5c and 5d. The mean particle size of Cs2Fex decreased from 30 nm to 24 nm when x increased from 0.1 to 0.3. This observation illustrated that the high content of Cu and Fe can restrain the growth of crystal grain size.

thermodynamics-catalysis-Crystalline-sizes

Figure 4: Crystalline sizes of (a) Cs2Cux catalysts before calcination; (b) Cs2Fex catalysts before calcination; (c) Cs2Cux catalysts after calcination; (d) Cs2Fex catalysts after calcination.

thermodynamics-catalysis-photographs-SEM

Figure 5: SEM photographs of the calcinated catalysts. (a) Cs2Cu0.1 catalyst; (b) Cs2Cu0.3 catalyst; (c) Cs2Fe0.1 catalyst; (d) Cs2Fe0.3 catalyst.

NH3-TPD analysis

It can be expected that the replacement of protons by Cu or Fe will lead to changes in acidic properties. NH3-TPD results were presented in Figure 6, all samples were calcinated under air atmosphere at 350°C for 12 h. The acid amount calculated from integration of peak area was exhibited in Tables 1 and 2. For Cs2Cux catalysts, NH3 may react with the Cu species in the catalyst resulting in the formation of Cu ammonia complex. Thus, it was necessary and reasonable to adjust the acid. The Tmax of desorption and the adjusted acid amounts were listed in Table 1. As described in Figure 6, all samples had a main desorption peak in the temperature range of 370-500°C, representing the main acidity sites of the catalysts. Compared with Cs2H, the Tmax of both Cs2Cux and Cs2Fex decreased. Moreover, for Cs2Fex (0.15≤x≤0.3) a small peak around 100°C and a big broad peak at temperatures between 250°C and 330°C were observed, indicating the presence of more weak acid sites in these catalysts. The formation of iron aqua complexes may result in such observation [3].

thermodynamics-catalysis-profiles-calcinated

Figure 6: NH3-TPD profiles of the calcinated catalysts. (a) Cs2Cux catalysts; (b) Cs2Fex catalysts.

Sample Tmaxof desorption /°C Acid amount /(mmol·g-1)
Cs2H 436 0.57
Cs2Cu0.05 418 0.43
Cs2Cu0.1 414 0.42
Cs2Cu0.15 415 0.38
Cs2Cu0.2 420 0.31
Cs2Cu0.25 414 0.29
Cs2Cu0.3 411 0.20

Table 1: The acid amounts of the calcinated Cs2Cux catalysts.

The acid amounts calculated from integration of peak area (Table 1) showed that the acid amounts of Cs2Cux catalysts decreased from 0.57 to 0.20 mmol·g-1 when x value increased from 0.0 to 0.3. As for Cs2Fex, there are both weak and strong acid sites existed in the catalysts, and the total amount of surface acid increased from 0.57 to 0.91 (Table 2) with the increase of Fe content from x=0.0 to 0.3. As Fe can reacted with water to form iron aqua complexes which showed weak acidity [24], the total amount of acid in Cs2Fex catalysts increased with the increasing of Fe content.

Sample Desorption Tmax/°C Acid amount/(mmol·g-1)
Weak Strong Total
Cs2Fe0.05 431 0.16 0.56 0.72
Cs2Fe0.1 429 0.22 0.55 0.77
Cs2Fe0.15 425 0.25 0.57 0.82
Cs2Fe0.2 425 0.40 0.54 0.94
Cs2Fe0.25 422 0.47 0.52 0.99
Cs2Fe0.3 413 0.43 0.48 0.91

Table 2: The acid amounts of the calcinated Cs2Fex catalysts.

H2-TPR analysis

Figure 7 showed the H2-TPR profiles of the calcinated catalysts. The temperature range of the main reduction peaks of all samples was between 450-600°C. According to the TG-DSC analysis, Cs2Cux and Cs2Fex catalysts completely decomposed when temperature was above 430°C. Hence, the reduction peaks between 450 and 600°C can be assigned to the reduction of the MoO3 formed from the decomposition of the Keggin anions during the H2-TPR experiment [19]. As shown in Figure 7a, with increasing Cu content, the main peak shifted from 582°C to 493°C suggesting that the replacement of protons by Cu would enhance the oxidizing ability of catalysts. In addition, a small reduction peak emerged around 200-250°C in H2-TPR profiles of Cs2Cu(0.1-0.3) which was associated with the reduction of copper oxide that produced during the decomposition of catalyst at high temperature. Compared with the Cs2H, the main reduction peak of Cs2Fex showed little difference, indicated that the Fe modification has no obvious effect on the oxidizing ability of the catalyst. Additionally, there is no characteristic peak of Fe2O3 was found in Cs2Fex catalysts.

thermodynamics-catalysis-H2-TPR-profiles

Figure 7: H2-TPR profiles of the calcinated catalysts. (a) Cs2Cux catalysts; (b) Cs2Fex catalysts.

Catalytic tests

The surface area of prepared Cs2Cux and Cs2Fex catalysts were characterized by BET measurements. It is found that all the prepared catalyst have close surface area to be about 10 m2·g-1. The results of MAL conversion over Cs2Cux catalysts with different Cu content at varied reaction temperatures were shown in Figure 8. When the reaction temperature was below 300°C, the addition of Cu just had small positive effect on the conversion of MAL. When the temperature raised to 300°C, MAL conversion of Cs2Cux can be improve significantly from 65% to 96% when small quantity of Cu was contained in the catalyst (x=0.05). However, further increase of Cu content in the catalyst induce decrease of conversion. Such phenomena can also be observed at higher reaction temperature like 320 and 340°C. The great improvement of MAL conversion indicated that small amount of Cu can enhance the oxidizing ability of catalysts when it reached a certain temperature. According to the former analysis, further increase of Cu content in the catalyst will decrease the acidity of the catalysts and thus weaken the adsorption of MAL on the catalyst and lower the catalytic activity. Therefore, the balance between Cu and proton content were important for promoting the catalytic activity [25]. It is also reported that in the presence of copper, the formation of oxygen vacancies turned to be easier [26], as a consequence of proton elimination associated with oxygen of the heteropolyanion [27]. This is consistent with our results. When the reaction temperature reached 320°C and 340°C, the MAL conversions on the Cs2Cu0.05 catalyst kept unchanged as 96%. But the conversion on the catalyst Cs2Cu0.25 and Cs2Cu0.3 fell to 89% and 83%, respectively, even lower than that of Cs2H.

thermodynamics-catalysis-conversion-MAL

Figure 8: The conversion of MAL over Cs2Cux (x=0.0-0.3) catalysts at different temperatures.

Figure 9 depicted the selectivity of the prepared Cs2H and Cs2Cux catalyst at different temperature. The results are complicated due to the complex reaction mechanism. First of all, the selectivity to MAA did not improved significantly when Cu was induced in to catalyst. For Cs2H, the selectivity to MAA was about 47% at three temperatures. For Cs2Cux (x=0.05-0.10), the selectivity to MAA even decreased at all the tested temperatures. When x value reached 0.15-0.20, the selectivity to MAA improved to 55%. Further increase of Cu content (x>0.20) result in the decline of MAA selectivity. Thus optimal x value in Cs2Cux catalyst was between 0.15-0.20. The result indicated the balance between the oxidation ability and acidity of the catalyst played a key role in determination the activity of the catalyst (Figure 10). Too low or too high loading of Cu would not good for the catalytic performance.

thermodynamics-catalysis-selectivity-MAL

Figure 9: The selectivity to MAA, acetic acid (AA) and COx (oxocarbon) over Cs2Cux (x=0.0-0.3) catalysts (a) 300°C; (b) 320°C; (c) 340°C.

thermodynamics-catalysis-promoted-reduction-process

Figure 10: Cu promoted the reduction process of catalysts by increasing oxidizing ability.

The MAL conversions of Cs2Fex catalysts were shown in Figure 11. At relative low reaction temperatures (260°C and 280°C), when x value in Cs2Fex catalyst is larger than 0.15, the conversion showed strong dependence on the content of Fe in the catalyst. At 300°C, the conversion showed almost linear relationship with the content of Fe in the catalyst. However, at higher temperatures (320 and 340°C), the conversion could reach 96%, but kept stable and showed little dependence on x value. This phenomenon was quite different from that of Cs2Cux catalyst, indicating different enhancement mechanism with these two kinds of catalysts. As we illustrated before, addition of Fe could only induce some weak acid sites in the catalyst and did not have any effect on oxidizing ability. Thus, the increase of MAL conversion may due to the enhanced water transfer by introduction of Fe in the catalyst, which can promote the reoxidation of the catalysts [28]. Additionally, the hydrated and dehydrated iron species should be in equilibrium in the secondary structure of Cs2Fex catalysts.

thermodynamics-catalysis-catalysts-different-temperatures

Figure 11: The conversion of MAL for Cs2Fex (x=0.0-0.3) catalysts at different temperatures.

The selectivity of Cs2Fex catalysts was shown in Figure 12. Compared with Cs2H and Cs2Cux catalysts, the selectivity to MAA over Cs2Fex catalysts were about 52% and showed little dependence on the Fe content. This is in agreement with that only reoxidation process of catalysts is speeded up by Fe modification (Figure 13).

thermodynamics-catalysis-selectivity-MAA

Figure 12: The selectivity of MAA, AA and oxocarbon for Cs2Fex (x=0.0-0.3) catalysts (a) 300°C; (b) 320°C; (c) 340°C.

thermodynamics-catalysis-speeded-reoxidation-process

Figure 13: Fe speeded up the reoxidation process of catalysts by assisting the water transfer.

Conclusion

In summary, the influence of Cu and Fe doping on Cs2HPMo12O40 catalyst for selective oxidation of methacrolein to methacrylic acid has been investigated. The introduction of Cu or Fe into catalyst did not modify the Keggin structure of the catalyst. Introduction of certain amount of Cu and Fe can improve the conversion of methacrolein from 65% to 96%. It is found that addition of Cu can enhance the oxidizing ability of the catalyst, whereas addition of Fe can enhance the reoxidation process of the catalyst.

References

  1. Stytsenko VD, Lee WH, Lee JW (2001) Catalyst Design for Methacrolein Oxidation to Methacrylic Acid. Kinetics & Catalysis 42: 212-216.
  2. Muneyama E, Kunishige A, Ohdan K (1994) ChemInform Abstract: Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Isobutyronitrile to Methacrylonitrile over Iron Phosphate Catalyst. Cheminform 89: 371-381.
  3. Langpape M, Millet JMM (2000) Effect of iron counter-ions on the redox properties of the Keggin-type molybdophosphoricheteropolyacid: Part I. An experimental study on isobutane oxidation catalysts. Applied Catalysis A: General 200: 89-101.
  4. Marosi L, Cox G, Tenten A, Hibst H (2000) In situ XRD investigations of heteropolyacid catalysts in the methacrolein to methacrylic acid oxidation reaction: Structural changes during the activation/deactivation process. Journal of Catalysis 194: 140-145.
  5. Guo X, Huang C, Li Y (2008) Effect of cesium content on the structure and catalytic performances of heteropoly compounds in one-step synthesis of methylmethacrylate from methacrolein. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering 25: 697-702.
  6. Deuser LM, Gaube JW, Martin FG, Hibst H (1996) Effects of Cs and V on heteropolyacid catalysts in methacrolein oxidation. Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis 101: 981-990.
  7. Zhang H, Yan R, Yang L, Diao Y, Wang L (2013) Investigation of Cu- and Fe-Doped CsH3PMo11VO40 Heteropoly Compounds for the Selective Oxidation of Methacrolein to Methacrylic Acid. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 52: 4484-4490.
  8. Konishi Y, Sakata K, Misono M, Yoneda Y (1982) Catalysis by heteropoly compounds: IV. Oxidation of methacrolein to methacrylic acid over 12-molybdophosphoric acid. Journal of Catalysis 77: 169-179.
  9. Harald Böhnke, Johann Gaube, Petzoldt J (2006) Selective Oxidation of Methacrolein towards Methacrylic Acid on Mixed Oxide (Mo, V, W) Catalysts. Part 1. Studies on kinetics. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 45: 8794-8800.
  10. Harald Böhnke, Johann Gaube, Petzoldt J (2006) Selective Oxidation of Methacrolein towards Methacrylic Acid on Mixed Oxide (Mo, V, W) Catalysts. Part 2. Variation of Catalyst Composition and Comparison with Acrolein Oxidation. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 45: 8801-8806.
  11. Misono M (1987) Acidic and catalytic properties of heteropoly compounds. Materials Chemistry & Physics 17(1-2): 103-120.
  12. Mizuno N, Tateishi M, Iwamoto M (1995) Pronounced catalytic activity of Fe0.08Cs2.5H1.26PVMo11O40, for direct oxidation of propane into acrylic acid. Applied Catalysis A: General 128: 165-170.
  13. Naitou H, Karasuda T, Fukui T (2007) Process for producing catalyst for methacrylic acid production, catalyst for methacrylic acid production, and process for producing methacrylic acid. US Patent.
  14. Guo X, Huang C, Chen B (2008) One-Step Synthesis of Methylmethacrylate from Methacrolein over Keggin-Type Heteropoly Compounds. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering 25: 675-680.
  15. Langpape M, Millet JMM, Ozkan US (1999) Study of Cesium or Cesium-Transition Metal-Substituted Keggin-Type Phosphomolybdic Acid as Isobutane Oxidation Catalysts: II. Redox and Catalytic Properties. Journal of Catalysis 182: 145-155.
  16. Miao S, Zhang J, Cao C, Zhang Q, Wang Y, et al. (2008) Significant effect of acidity on catalytic behaviors of Cs-substituted polyoxometalates for oxidative dehydrogenation of propan. Applied Catalysis A: General 349: 212-221.
  17. Villabrille P, Romanelli G, Vázquez P, Cáceres C (2004) Vanadium-substituted Kegginheteropolycompounds as catalysts for ecofriendly liquid phase oxidation of 2,6-dimethylphenol to 2,6-dimethyl-1,4-benzoquinone. Applied Catalysis A: General 270: 101-111.
  18. Bruckman K, Haber J, Serwicka EM (1989) Acid-base and oxidation catalysis on heteropolysalts with surface acid layers. Faraday Discussions of the Chemical Society 87: 173-187.
  19. Zhou L, Wang L, Zhang S, Yan R, Diao Y (2015) Effect of vanadyl species in Keggin-type heteropoly catalysts in selective oxidation of methacrolein to methacrylic acid. Journal of Catalysis 329: 431-440.
  20. Huynh Q, Schuurman Y, Delichere P,Loridant S, Millet JM (2009) Study of Te and V as counter-cations in Keggin type phosphomolybdicpolyoxometalate catalysts for isobutane oxidation. Journal of Catalysis 261: 166-176.
  21. Langpape M, Millet JMM, Ozkan US (1999) Study of Cesium or Cesium-Transition Metal-Substituted Keggin-Type Phosphomolybdic Acid as Isobutane Oxidation Catalysts: I. Structural characterization. Journal of Catalysis 181: 80-90.
  22. Texier F, Servant L, Bruneel JL, Argoul F (1998) In situ probing of interfacial processes in the electrodeposition of copper by confocal Raman microspectroscopy. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 446: 189-203.
  23. Qian D, Jiang S, Cai T, Peng Z, Fang Z (2005) Selective oxidation of isobutane over HxFe0.12Mo11VPAs0.3Oy, heteropoly compound catalyst. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 229: 165-170.
  24. Capek L, Kreibich V, Dedecek J (2005) Analysis of Fe species in zeolites by UV-VIS- NIR, IR spectra and voltammetry. Effect of preparation, Fe loading and zeolite type. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 80: 279-289.
  25. Mamoru AI (1982) Effects of cations introduced into 12-molybdophosphoric acid on the catalyst properties. Applied Catalysis 4: 245-256.
  26. Feng LC, Pham C, Bey F, Hervé G (2002) Oxidation of isobutane catalyzed by vanadyl, copper and cesium substituted H3PMo12O40. Reaction Kinetics & Catalysis Letters 75: 305-314.
  27. Hodnett BK, Moffat JB (1984) Application of temperature-programmed desorption to the study of heteropoly compounds: Desorption of water and pyridine. Journal of Catalysis 88: 253-263.
  28. Levy LB, Degroot PB (1982) Deactivation characteristics of an acrolein oxidation catalyst:I. Kinetics of activity loss. Journal of Catalysis 76: 385-392.
Citation: Wang S, Ma X, Wang L, Zhou L (2016) Cu or Fe Modified Cs2HPMo12O40 as Catalysts for Selective Oxidation of Methacrolein. J Thermodyn Catal 7:175.

Copyright: © 2016 Wang S, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top