Internal Medicine: Open Access
Open Access

Developing Metrics that Accurately Reflect the Real Value of Primary Care

Paul Yageria^{* *}Correspondence: Paul Yageria, Department of Medicine, Osaka University, New York, USA, Email:

Author info »

Description

Primary Care (PC) is a critical component of any high-quality healthcare system, and it benefits disadvantaged people in particular. It helps health systems operate better overall, and nations that refocus their health systems to PC are better poised to attain universal health coverage. Individuals, populations, and health systems all benefit from personal computers, according to decades of research.

PC contributes to the health of all members of society and increases fairness in access and outcomes as a crucial component of any high-quality healthcare system. PC has a particularly positive impact on vulnerable patients, such as those with multiple health problems, people from socially deprived backgrounds, and those with poorly defined illnesses or limited health literacy, as it is capable of meeting 80-90 percent of an individual's healthcare needs over their lifetime. A healthy PC workforce is linked to a decreased death rate. The necessity of investing in PC will become even more as the population ages and multimorbidity becomes the norm.

PC helps health systems enhance their entire performance by enhancing equality, patient-centeredness, access, continuity, coordination, comprehensiveness, quality, and efficiency of treatment. PC is a vital link between personal and population health, and for most individuals, it has been the primary source of treatment for the past 50 years. Even if health systems with more advanced PC are slightly more expensive.

It is critical to evaluate PC performance in health systems in order to create PC-friendly health policies. And here's the rub: health-care success is mostly measured using disease-specific measures such as mortality, life expectancy, and management. PC, on the other hand, is in charge of dealing with the vast majority of health issues that aren't always reflected in a precise diagnostic and/or leading to preventative and self-management choices. This leads to a bias toward secondary care, which is focused on particular diagnoses that are too narrowly defined to account for overall care quality in complicated populations with multimorbidity and limited access to treatment.

Consequences of primary care and primary health care

While the terms PHC and PC are sometimes interchanged, the World Health Organization (WHO) defines PHC as a health policy and service delivery model that encompasses both individual-based care and population-level public health and policy. Health promotion, illness prevention, public health, and rehabilitation services are all part of population health. PHC also includes a wide range of multi-sectorial services, such as community-based social services.

In the quest of health care and health, PC entails first contact with patients and their families. Individual care encompasses a person's overall health and well-being, as well as the health and well-being of their family, at all ages and phases of life. Family medicine is the medical specialty that serves as the primary point of contact and, in many cases, the leader of a contemporary PC team. Patients' varied medical conditions can be addressed by family doctors, who can also integrate treatment for individuals and families throughout the entire spectrum of PHC. However, depending on the environment and culture, the effectiveness of modern family physicians is dependent on a variety of other health professionals in the PC team, including as nurses, midwives, pharmacists, mental health workers, and others. PC teams with effective communication channels between professionals and tight collaboration with them have a higher success rate. The Lancet Global Health Commission on High Quality Health Systems recommends that the core metrics of health system performance be competent and respectful care, better health, and health system trust, and that other health system components like finance, management, or organization are a function of high quality, equitable, and efficient care.

Conclusion

The alignment of partners and stakeholders to support national objectives and policies, and the empowerment of individuals and communities to improve their own health and well-being. Various countries have different health-care systems. PC is distinct from, but overlaps with, PHC. The high-value functions of the PC are universal, but how they are translated into services depends on population requirements, the health professionals available to offer care, population socioeconomic circumstances, and governmental commitment to PHC. The capacity to compare national health systems, identify best practise, and influence strategic action by policymakers and governments is enabled by describing and quantifying the type and quality of both PC and PHC services. The above-mentioned frameworks are novel steps. The capacity to compare the national health systems, identify best practices, and drive strategic action by policymakers and governments is enabled by describing and quantifying the type and quality of both PC and PHC services. Only a systematic application of PC and PHC performance monitoring in diverse health systems and socioeconomic and cultural locations throughout the world can reveal their genuine strengths and limits.