Journal of Chromatography & Separation Techniques
Open Access

Development and Validation of HPTLC Method for the Simultaneous Estimation of Curcumin and Azadirachtin

Sushmita I. Hiremath¹, Mahesh. S. Palled^1*, Rajesh K Joshi², Mahendra Kumar Chouhan³ and Shailendra S. Suryawanshi^{1 *}Correspondence: Mahesh. S. Palled, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, KLE College of Pharmacy Belagavi, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavi, Karnataka, India, Email:

Author info »

Abbreviations

μl: Microlitre; LOD: Limit of Detection; LOQ: Limit of Quantification; HPTLC: High Performance Thin Layer Chromatography; CUM: Curcumin; ADT: Azadirachtin

Introduction

Curcumin Figure 1 is the active constituent of curcuminoid of the turmeric i.e. Curcuma longa belonging to the family Zingiberaceae [1]. It is used as a dietary supplement. It acts as a chemo preventive agent and anti-inflammatory agent [2-6]. Azadirachtin Figure 2 is the active constituent present in the neem i.e. Azadirachta indica belongs to the family Meliaceae which belongs to the limonoid group [2]. Azadirachtin is the main compound of neem present in the neem seed and neem leaf etc. which is mainly used as insecticide and also it is useful in blood purification and detoxification [3-6]. In order to estimate Curcumin and Azadirachtin in marketed formulation few UV–Spectrophotometric methods, HPLC methods have beenw reported by other researchers. Hence there is need to develop and validate HPTLC method for simultaneous estimation of Curcumin and Azadirachtin in marketed formulation.

Figure 1: Structure of curcumin.

Figure 2: Structure of azadirachtin.

Materials and Methods

Instrumentation

HPTLC instrument of CAMAG with Win Cats and Vision cat software used for the analysis of the Curcumin and Azadirachtin. Calibrated weighing balance was used for weighing.

Drug sample

Azadirachtin (API) was obtained from Kaizen Biochem, Amravati, Maharashtra. The curcumin was obtained from the Geekay Bioproducts, Dharapuram, Tamilnadu and marketed formulation is purchased from market.

Reagents and chemicals

Methanol and other chemicals used for the experiment were obtained from the store house of KLE College of Pharmacy and ICMR, Belagavi.

Selection of wavelength

Methanol was selected for the preparation of the standard stock solution because Curcumin and Azadirachtin both are soluble in methanol. In the combination of Curcumin and Azadirachtin the standard solution was prepared and 3 μl/spot is applied on the stationary phase and plate is developed, scanned under 254 nm using deuterium and tungsten lamp.

Preparation of stock solution

An accurately weighed 2 mg of Curcumin and 10 mg of Azadirachtin was taken in clean and dried 10 ml volumetric flask and dissolved in methanol then volume is made using the same. This was considered as standard stock solution having concentration of 200 μg/ml for Curcumin and 1000 μg/ml for Azadirachtin.

Preparation of calibration curve

From the standard stock solution containing concentrations of 1.5-15 μl/spot were applied on the stationary phase. Then the plate is developed using the mobile phase. After the development the plate is dried and scanned under 254 nm using deuterium and tungsten lamp. Linearity curve was plotted as Concentration (μl/spot) on x-axis and Area on y-axis and linear regression equation was calculated.

Method development and validation

Curcumin and Azadirachtin found to be soluble in methanol. Therefore, this solvent was used for the determination of detection wavelength and working concentration of standard. International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) has provided guidelines i.e. Q2(R1) for validation of analytical method which defines this process as characteristic performance that is established by laboratory studies. Developed method was validated according to the ICH guidelines for the validation of analytical procedures in order to prove the suitability of method using method parameters [7-10].

Specificity

The chromatogram of standards is obtained and there was no any interference of mobile phase and hence it indicates that the developed method is specific.

Linearity

Linearity was examined in the range of 1.5-15 μl/spot. An accurately weighed 2 mg of Curcumin and 10 mg of Azadirachtin was taken in clean and dried 10 ml volumetric flask and dissolved in methanol then volume is made using the same. This was considered as standard stock solution having concentration of 200 μg/ml for Curcumin and 1000 μg/ml for Azadirachtin.

LOD and LOQ

Limit of detection is concentration at which analyte in the test sample is detected. Limit of quantification is the concentration at which analyte in the test sample is quantified. By using the following formula LOD and LOQ are calculated.

LOD=3.3 × standard deviation of regression

Slope

LOQ=10 × standard deviation of regression

Slope

Precision

In order to determine system precision three replicates of solution containing 3 μl/spot, 9 μl/spot and 15 μl/spot of combination standard stock solution of Curcumin and Azadirachtin were applied on the stationary phase, plate is developed and scanned. Area of each application was measured at 254 nm using deuterium and tungsten lamp and %RSD (Relative Standard Deviation) was calculated.

Method Precision was determined by performing assay of sample under the tests of

1) Intraday precision

2) Interday precision

For Intraday Precision three replicates of solution containing concentration 3 μl/spot, 9 μl/spot, and 15 μl/spot of standard stock solution is analyzed and %RSD was calculated at different time intervals on the same day. For Interday Precision three replicates of solution containing concentration 3 μl/spot, 9 μl/ spot, and 15 μl/spot of standard stock solution is analyzed and %RSD was calculated on three consecutive days.

Ruggedness

Ruggedness was determined by performing the same proposed method on same instrument by different analyst to check the reproducibility.

Robustness

Robustness is done by changing the ratio of the mobile phase

Accuracy

Accuracy was determined by performing recovery experiments in which determination of % mean recovery of sample by standardization method at three different levels 50%, 100% and 150% of the sample solutions were prepared. An accurately weighed 2 mg of Curcumin and 10 mg of Azadirachtin was taken in clean and dried 10 ml volumetric flask and dissolved in methanol then volume is made using the same. At each level three replicates of concentration (ng/spot) solution was prepared and recovery study was carried out.

Analysis of marketed formulation

The validated method was applied for the determination of Curcumin and Azadirachtin in marketed formulation. Twenty capsules were weighed and calculated the average weight of capsule. The amount of drug in sample was in good agreement with the label claim of the formulation. Percent assay of Curcumin and Azadirachtin was found to be 92.95% and 91.79% respectively.

Quantification

The test sample applied and chromatograms are obtained under the same conditions as per the standard drug. The area of the standard Curcumin and Azadirahtin recorded and with the help of the calibration plot regression equation is obtained for both the drugs.

Results and Discussion

Method development

HPTLC method was developed by using CAMAG HPTLC instrument using a solvent system Toluene:Ethyl acetate:Ammonia:Formic acid (4:3:2.5:0.5 v/v/v/v) at 254 nm and details of method developed were presented in Table 1 [11-14].

Table 1: Developed method parameters.

Method validation

Developed method was validated in terms of validation parameters such as specificity, linear range, precision, robustness, ruggedness and reproducibility as per ICH guidelines.

Specificity

The chromatogram of standards is obtained and there was no any interference of mobile phase and hence it indicates that the developed method is specific.

Linearity

As mentioned in the above method the linearity range was found to be 1.5-15 μl/spot. The linearity graph is given in Figure 3, the linearity and range is given in Tables 2 and 3. The calibration curves are given in Figures 4 and 5.

Table 2: System precision data of Curcumin and Azadirachtin.

Table 3: Intraday precision data of Curcumin and Azadirachtin.

Figure 3: Linearity graph of curcumin and azadirachtin.

Figure 4: Linearity curve of curcumin.

Figure 5: Linearity curve of azadirachtin.

Precision

System precision: As mentioned in the method in order to determine system precision three replicates of solution containing 3 μl/spot, 9 μl/spot and 15 μl/spot of combination standard stock solution of Curcumin and Azadirachtin were applied on the stationary phase, plate is developed and scanned. Area of each application was measured at 254 nm using deuterium and tungsten lamp and %RSD (Relative Standard Deviation) was calculated [15].

Intraday precision: For intraday precision three replicates of solution containing 3 μl/spot, 9 μl/spot and 15 μl/spot of combination standard stock solution of Curcumin and Azadirachtin were applied on the stationary phase, plate is developed and scanned. Area of each application was measured at 254 nm using deuterium and tungsten lamp and %RSD was found to be less than 2% (Table 4) [16-19].

Table 4: Intraday precision data of Curcumin and Azadirachtin.

Interday precision: For Interday precision three replicates of solution containing 3 μl/spot, 9 μl/spot and 15 μl/spot of combination standard stock solution of Curcumin and Azadirachtin were applied on the stationary phase and %RSD was calculated on three consecutive days. And the calculated %RSD was found to be less than 2% (Tables 5-9).

Table 5: Interday precision data of Curcumin and Azadirachtin.

Ruggedness

Ruggedness was determined by performing the same proposed method by different analyst to check the reproducibility which showed %RSD less than 2% and indicates that the method developed is rugged (Table 6).

Table 6: Ruggedness data of Curcumin and Azadirachtin.

Robustness

Robustness is done by changing the mobile phase ratio i.e. Toluene:Ethyl acetate:Ammonia:Formic acid (4:3:2.6:0.4 v/v/v/ v), Toluene:Ethyl acetate:Ammonia:Formic acid (4:3:2.5:0.5 v/v/ v/v) and Toluene:Ethyl acetate:Ammonia:Formic acid (4:3:2.4:0.6 v/v/v/v).. The %RSD was found to be less than 2% (Table 7).

Table 7: Robustness data of Curcumin and Azadirachtin.

Accuracy

Accuracy was determined by performing recovery experiments in which determination of % mean recovery of sample by standardization method at three different levels 50%, 100% and 150% of the sample solutions were prepared. And the percent recovery is found in the range of 91-109% for Azadirachtin and 91%-105% for Curcumin (Tables 8 and 9) [20-22].

Table 8: Recovery data of Curcumin.

Table 9: Recovery data of Azadirachtin.

Quantification

Sample peaks were identified. The result of analysis proved that the content of Curcumin and Azadirachtin can be quantified [22].

Conclusion

It can be concluded that the developed method for the simultaneous estimation of Curcumin and Azadirachtin. In marketed formulation is simple, sensitive, accurate, precise, and reproducible. The excipients of the commercial sample analyzed did not interfere in the analysis, which proved the specificity of the methods for this formulation.

Acknowledgement

The authors are thankful to Principal Dr. S. S. Jalalpure and Vice Principal Dr. M. B. Patil and director of ICMR and BSRC for their support and guidance. Authors are thankful to Mr. Nikhil Gawas, Mr. Onkar Supe and Mr. Prathamesh Katte for helping during the research work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

References

1. Sethi PD. High Performance Thin Layer Chromatography, Quantitative Analysis of Pharmaceutical Formulations:1st edition. New Delhi:Stish Kumar Jain for CBS Publishers and Distributors.1996;2(2):3-4.

   [Cross Ref] [Google scholar] [Pub Med]

2. Kokate CK, Purohit AP,Gokhale SB.Pharmacognosy;Fourty First Edition. Nirali Publication.2008; 11.109-11.111.

   [Google scholar]

3. Curcumin .Drugbank online.2020.
4. Curcumin.Pubchem.2020.
5. Azadirachtin.Pubchem.2020.
6. Vyas NI, Kanan G, Khan MY, Panchal S, Pundarikakshudu K. Simultaneous estimation of Curcumin and Piperine in their crude powder mixture and Ayurvedic formulation using High performance thin layer chromatography. Indian Journal of Research in pharmaceutical and biomedical sciences.2011;2(1).231-236.

   [Cross Ref] [Google scholar]  

7. Kharat S,  Namdeo A,  Mehta P. Development and validation of HPTLC method for simultaneous estimation of curcumin and galangin in polyherbal capsule dosage form .Journal of Taibah University for Science;2016;11(5).1-18.

   [Cross Ref]

8. Wafaa A, Zaghary, Emily T. Hanna, Marwa A, Zanoun Y et al. Curcumin; Analysis and Stability. Journal of advanced pharmacy research.2019;3(2).47-58.

   [Cross Ref]

9. Shah MA,  Patel H,  Raj H. Methods for the estimation of ellegic aci and cucumin in Antidiabetic herbal formulations- A review. Eurasian Journal of Analytical Chemistry.2017;12(4);295-311.

   [Cross Ref] [Google scholar] [Pub Med]

10. Shanmugapriya P, Murugesan M.Qualitative analysis and quantitative determination of curcumin in a Siddha Herbo-Mineral formulation using high performance thin layer chromatography. World journal of pharmaceutical research.2016;5(5).1158-1166.

    [Google scholar]

11. Shukla A, Sachan M,  Bigoniya M. Comparative antidiabetic potential Assessment of Herbal formulation of Gymnemic acid and Curcumin. International journal of pharmaceutical sciences and drug research .2019;11(3).98-104.

    [Cross Ref] [Google scholar]

12. Vyas NI,  Patel S. Simultaneous estimation of curcuminoids , piperine and gallic acid in an ayurvedic formulation by validated high performance thin layer chromatographic method. Asian journal of pharmaceutical and clinical research.2016;9(2).117-122.

    [Cross Ref] [Google scholar]

13. Chavan AK, Nirmal SA, Pattan SR. Development and validation of HPTLC method to detect curcumin and gallic acid in polyherbal microencapsulated formulation. Journal of liquid chromatography and related technologies.2015;11(5).1213-1217.

    [Cross Ref] [Google scholar]

14. Dhalwal K, Biradar YS, Shinde VM, Mahadik KR, Rajani M. Phytochemical evaluation and validation of a polyherbal formulation using HPTLC. Pharmacognosy magazine.2008;4(14).89-95.  

    [Google scholar]

15. Prekh PP, Jadhav AP. Simultaneous HPTLC estimation of berberine and curcumin in gruhadhoomadi Churna. Indian Journal of pharmaceutical science.2018;80(3).570-574.  

    [Google scholar]

16. Gosavi S, Kasar S, Warule P,  Pawar S. Development and validation of RP-HPLC and HPTLC method for the estimation of curcumin in haridrakhand polyherbal tablet formulation. Journal of pharmacognosy and phytochemistry.2019;8(3).2562-2568.  

    [Google scholar]

17. kumar VY,Thakker, Shah V, Shah UD, Suthar MP. Simultaneous estimation of gallic acid, curcumin and quercetin by HPTLC method. Journal of Advanced pharmacy education and research.2011;1.70-80.  

    [Google scholar]

18. LallaJK, Hamrapurkar PD, Patil PS. Azadirachtin as a biomarker compound in HPTLC assay of seed and seed oil of Azadirachta Indica . Journal of planar chromatography.2003;16.311-314.

    [Google scholar]

19. Nicoletti M,  Petitto V, Gallo FR,  Multari G,  Federici E,Palazzino G. The modern analytical determination of botanicals and similar novel natural products by thr HPTLC fingerprint approach. Bioactive natural products.2012;37.217-258.

    [Cross Ref] [Google scholar]

20. Nicoletti M, Tomiolo C, Murugan k. The HPTLC approach to metabolomic determination of neem products composition.Pharmacology online.2013;3.122-127.  

    [Google scholar]

21. Geneva,Guidance ICH . validation of analytical method: definition and terminology,Q2A .International Conference on Harmonization.  

    [Google scholar]

22. guidance ICH, Geneva. validation of analytical procedures: methodology ,Q2B.International Conference on Harmonization.

    [Google scholar]