Entomology, Ornithology & Herpetology: Current Research

Entomology, Ornithology & Herpetology: Current Research
Open Access

ISSN: 2161-0983

+44 1478 350008

Research Article - (2015) Volume 4, Issue 3

Differential Gene Expression Profiling in Bed Bug (Cimex Lectularius L.) Fed on Ibuprofen and Caffeine in Reconstituted Human Blood

Ralph B. Narain, Haichuan Wang and Shripat T. Kamble*
Department of Entomology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA
*Corresponding Author: Shripat T. Kamble, Department of Entomology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA Email:

Abstract

The recent resurgence of the common bed bug (Cimex lectularius L.) infestations worldwide has created a need for renewed research on biology, behavior, population genetics and management practices. Humans serve as exclusive hosts to bed bugs in urban environments. Since a majority of humans consume Ibuprofen (as pain medication) and caffeine (in coffee and other soft drinks) so bug bugs subsequently acquire Ibuprofen and caffeine through blood feeding. However, the effect of these chemicals at genetic level in bed bug is unknown. Therefore, this research was conducted to determine differential gene expression in bed bugs using RNA-Seq analysis at dosages of 200 ppm Ibuprofen and 40 ppm caffeine incorporated into reconstituted human blood and compared against the control. Total RNA was extracted from a single bed bug per replication per treatment and sequenced. Read counts obtained were analyzed using Bioconductor software programs to identify differentially expressed genes, which were then searched against the non-redundant (nr) protein database of National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). Data on comparison of differentially expressed genes between control and Ibuprofen treatments revealed that 659 genes were significantly differentially regulated and 95% of them returned BLAST hits. Heat stress proteins were among the top significantly differentially down regulated genes. Comparison of the control vs caffeine treatments revealed that 2,161 genes were significantly differently regulated (Padj <0.05). Heat shock proteins were among the top ten down regulated genes in both treatments. Finally, using RNAi to identify the exact function of these highly differentially expressed genes and regulating these genes may offer potential for managing bed bug populations.

<

Keywords: Cimex lectularius; Bed bugs; Ibuprofen caffeine; Differential gene expression; Next RNA sequencing

Introduction

Bed bugs (Cimex lectularius L., Hemiptera: Cimicidae) are intermittent ectoparasities. They spend most of their time in their harborage of cracks and crevices of structures and leave only to feed. They feed mainly on the blood of mammals and birds, such as bats, humans and fowls. Bed bug nymphs and adults of both sexes require a blood meal for survival, growth and reproduction. Of the 92 described Cimicidae species, only three of them (C. lectularius, C. hemipterus F. and Leptocimex boueti Brumpt) attack humans, and they have been closely associated with humans since recorded history [1,2]. The recent resurgence of the common bed bug infestations worldwide has created a need for renewed interest in conducting new research on biology, behavior, population genetics and management practices.

Humans consume Ibuprofen to relieve headache, minor aches, and pains. Similarly, humans use coffee and other soft drinks containing caffeine. Bed bugs potentially procure Ibuprofen and caffeine from the blood stream while feeding on humans [1-3]. The biological impacts of these chemicals on bed bugs were recently determined by Narain and Kamble [4]. This research is the next phase in exploring the effects of Ibuprofen and caffeine on differential gene expression in bed bugs.

Ibuprofen (iso-butyl-propanoic-phenolic acid) is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug and it is used for reducing fever and pain from headache, toothache, back pain, arthritis, menstrual cramps, or minor injury. Ibuprofen is the active ingredient in more than 50 brand names and generic medications, such as Advil, Motrin that humans consume [5,6].

Caffeine (1,3,7-trimethylxanthine) is a bitter white crystalline alkaloid that acts as a central nervous system stimulant. Caffeine is the most widely consumed addictive substance in the world at the approximate rate of 70 to 76 mg/person/day. The caffeine consumption in USA was estimated at 196 to 238 mg daily [7], and major sources are coffee, chocolate, tea and some soft drinks. The caffeine amount in food products depends on serving size, type of product and preparation method [8-10].

Molecular research on modulation of gene expression and functional genomics associated with insecticide resistance has contributed to the in-depth understanding of resistance evolution in insects [11]. Insects have numerous insecticide detoxification genes. Strode et al. [12] reported 235 cytochrome P450, glutathione transferase and carboxy/cholinesterase genes in Aedes aegypti L. which is an increase of 58% and 36% compared with Drosophila melanogaster Meigen and Anopheles gambiae Giles, respectively. The human body louse, Pediculus humanus humanus L. has 37 cytochrome P450, 13 glutathione-S-transferase and 17 esterase genes which are approximately half the number found in D. melanogaster and A. gambiae [13]. A subset of these gene families is associated with xenobiotic detoxification. Ibuprofen and caffeine added to the blood would be identified by the bed bugs as xenobiotic which would result in an up regulation of these detoxification genes. Zhu et al. [14] identified 14 molecular markers which are associated with pyrethroid resistance in the bed bug. Some of these genes are involved in reducing or slowing down the amount of the toxin reaching the target sites and others are associated with increased metabolic detoxification and translocation by ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters. Mamidala et al. [15] used next-generation RNA sequencing technique to discover Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs) between pesticide resistant and susceptible strains of C. lectularius and identified cuticular proteins, metabolic detoxification proteins and ABC transporters in their pool of DEGs.

This research uses ribonucleic acid sequencing (RNA-Seq) analysis to determine differential gene expression in bed bugs fed with Ibuprofen and caffeine in reconstituted human blood. We hypothesize that there would be an up regulation in the detoxification genes in bed bugs after ingesting Ibuprofen and caffeine. This hypothesis was tested with the following objectives: 1) determine the differential gene expression in bed bugs 24 hr after ingesting Ibuprofen and caffeine; and 2) delineate the functions of the significantly differentially expressed genes.

Materials and Methods

Insects

The colony of bed bugs (Harlan strain) used throughout this study was established from live specimens obtained from the Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN on March 2011. The Minnesota bed bug colony are descendants from the colony acquired from the Insect Control Research Center (Baltimore, MD) [16], with specimens collected from a natural infestation in Gainesville, FL prior to 1983. In our laboratory, the bed bugs were confined in 500 mL Van Water and Rogers (VWR) short wide-mouth glass jar (VWR International, Radnor, PA), containing 9.0 cm circular VWR filter papers (Radnor, PA) with four folds for harborage and substrate for eggs. The glass jars containing bed bugs were covered with organza fabric (JoAnn’s Fabric, Lincoln, NE) for ventilation and containment. All jars were maintained in a Percival Scientific environmental growth chamber (Perry, IA) at 23 ± 2°C, 55 ± 5% relative humidity, and a photoperiod of 12:12 (Light: Dark) [17]. The bed bugs were fed weekly with expired Reconstituted Human Blood (RHB) obtained from the Nebraska blood bank (Lincoln, NE).

Treatments

This study included three treatments: 1) Ibuprofen 200 ppm, 2) caffeine 40 ppm, and 3) control (untreated). Each treatment had three replications. Each concentration of Ibuprofen and caffeine was incorporated in the reconstituted human blood and ten adult female bed bugs per treatment/replication were allowed to feed for 45 minutes, as per the feeding experiment described in Narain and Kamble [4]. After the completion of feeding, bed bugs were placed in a growth chamber set at 23 ± 2°C, 55 ± 5% R. H., and 12:12 (Light: Dark with light on 10 AM) for 24 hr. The 24 hr time interval was chosen to conduct the differential expression analysis in the bed bugs based on research of Marinotti et al. [18] and Dana et al. [19] who reported that after a blood meal, genes expressed in A. gambiae begin to climb and reach their peak at 24 hr post feeding (greater than 100 fold for some genes), then begin to drop.

Individual bed bugs that fed to repletion were then removed and placed in 1.5 mL centrifuge tube, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, and kept in -80°C freezer for RNA extraction.

RNA extraction and sequencing

Five extractions of total RNA per treatment (Ibuprofen, caffeine and control) from a single bed bug were done using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, Cat. 74104) and treated with RNase-Free DNase (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, Cat. 79254) to eliminate the DNA contamination, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The quality and quantity of RNA samples were evaluated on NanoDrop-l000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) and on 1% AMRESCO Formaldehyde-Free RNA Gel Kit N726-KIT (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Nine RNA samples (3 treatments x 3 replications) were submitted to the University of Nebraska-Omaha Medical Center (UNMC) Next Generation Sequence (NGS) Core Facility for additional quality assessment of the total RNA samples on Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies Inc. Santa Clara, CA) and sequencing on the Illumina HISeq 2500 Sequencer ( Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA).

RNA sequencing data analysis

The differential expression was determined by the number of RNA reads that mapped to the transcript which was correlated with its abundance level. In RNA-Seq analysis, the expression signal of a transcript depends on the sequencing depth and expression levels of other transcripts [20,21]. RNA-Seq analysis was enabled by the reduced costs in rapid, high-throughput sequencing technology [22]. A typical statistical approach for differential expression (DE) detection uses Poisson or negative binomial distributions and normalization procedure to model the gene count data [23]. This study used Bioconductor packages DESeq and edgeR to conduct the differential gene expression analysis on the read counts from the RNA sequencing data.

RNA sequencing data analysis was conducted on the Holland Computing Center (HCC) at the University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE. Programs and scripts used for the analyses included Sickle 1.33 [24], Bowtie 2.2.1.0 [25], TopHat 2.0.9 [26,27], HTSeq-count 0.6.1 [28], R 3.0.1 [29], DESeq 1.2.8 [30], DESeq 2 1.4.4 [31], edgeR 3.4.2 [32], Blast 2.2.26 [33,34] and Blast2GO [35]. The bed bug reference genome and annotation (V 0.5.2, released November 2011) were used in this analysis and are available on the i5K Pilot Project at Baylor College of Medicine on Human Genome Sequencing Center website https://www.hgsc.bcm.edu/arthropods/bed-bug-genome-project.

The Bowtie2 software, bowtie2-builder and bowtie2-inspect were used to create and inspect an index of the bed bug genome. The raw RNA-seq reads were filtered using sickle which removed and trimmed the low quality (Q <20) sequence reads for better mapping. The filtered RNA-seq reads were mapped to the indexes of the bed bug genome using TopHat2. The file with mapped sequencing reads and the list of annotated genes were then input into HTSeq-count to determine the number reads that mapped to each gene and to generate the read counts data.

Analysis of the read counts obtained from the RNA sequences for the differentially expressed genes were done using DESeq and edgeR. For RNA sequencing data analysis, the approach used by the DESeq program was to take the read count data generated, after it was mapped to annotated genes then performed the statistical analysis to discover quantitative changes of expression levels between experimental groups based on the Fisher’s exact test [28,36]. The edgeR program implemented an exact statistical approach for multi-group experiments based on generalized linear models [32,37]. For both programs, adjustment for multiple testing was accomplished by the False Discovery Rate (FDR) procedure of Benjamini and Hochberg [38]. By using both programs to identify the significantly differentially expressed genes, one program corroborated the results obtained from the other.

The read counts data from the ethanol treatment were compared against the control (untreated treatment) using DESeq to identify gene differentially expressed. DESeq calculated the variance-mean dependence from the read count data and tested for differential gene expression using the negative binomial distribution. The analyses were repeated with edgeR which used empirical Bayes estimation and exact tests based on the negative binomial distribution to determine the differential expression. A significantly differentially expressed gene was determined as having an adjusted p-value (padj) and false discovery rate (FDR) of less than 0.05 [39]. A comparison of the results from DESeq and edgeR were made and genes that were present in both outputs, and met the conditions for significance, were accepted as differentially expressed genes between the control (untreated) and the treatments.

Blast2GO analysis

The DEGs genes were compared against the nr database of the NCBI (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/db/) using the BLASTx algorithm. Blast2GO (http://www.blast2go.com/b2ghome) was used to assign functional groups to the predicted proteins from control (untreated) and the treatments and gene ontology associations were obtained with similarity (e <10–5) to proteins in the nr database. The gene function enrichment analyses were also conducted in Blast2GO, which applied the Fisher’s Exact Test to annotated sequences without consideration of the number of reads. Gene ontology categories were identified as significantly enriched at P <0.05.

Gene validation

Two genes, cytochrome p450 9e2 (significantly up-regulated) and vitellogenin (significantly down-regulated) were selected for validation with quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) (Table 1). The ClRp18 gene [40] was used as the housekeeping gene. The primers for qPCR for cytochrome p450 9e2 and vitellogenin genes were designed by using primer3 (http://bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3/, [41,42]. The primer efficiency was determined on the Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast Real- Time PCR System (Foster City, CA) using SYBR® Green Master Mix. The primer sets with primer efficiency between 90-110% were used in qPCR. The quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qRTPCR) was also conducted on same equipment by using the same kit (PN 4385372), according to the protocol in the manual.

    Efficiency test
Primer Sequence (5' to 3') Slope Y-intercept R2 Efficiency
CYP1241E_QRT1_LEFT TCCCAAGTTTGACCAATGCG -3.28 20.84 0.999 101.78
CYP1241E_QRT1_RIGHT GAGAGCATGTGTGACGCTTT        
VETO1309_QRT4_LEFT ACCTACTTCCGTGCTCAACA -4.04 16.56 0.999 101.80
VETO1309_QRT4_RIGHT GTCTTCTTTGTCGTGGGCAG        

Table 1: Primer sequences and efficiency test for bed bug genes used in qRTP-PCR expression validation.

Results

Differential gene expression

A summary of the data obtained from the mapping of the RNA sequences to the bed bug genome for the Ibuprofen, caffeine and control treatments is presented in Table 2. The Q score (Q <20) was used to access the sequencing data and averages of 0.0388% (range 0.037 to 0.041) of the sequences were removed by sickle [24]. The overall alignment rate varied between 74.5% for Ibuprofen replication 1 and 79.5% for caffeine replication 2. The concordant pair alignment rate ranged from 66.9 to 72.0% (Table 2).

RNA Sequence Input read Reads removed Overall mapping rate (%) Alignment
 / Accession # Q < 20 Percent Pairs % Concordant
Control Rep. 1 28629865 11739 0.041 75.5 19784343 66.9
/SRX1025857
Control Rep. 2 36307803 14887 0.041 77.5 25992583 70.2
/SRX1025916
Control Rep. 3 35471224 13125 0.037 75.1 24490490 67.1
/ SRX1036840
Ibuprofen Rep. 1 32575940 13833 0.039 77.1 22997040 68.8
/ SRX1029421
Ibuprofen Rep. 2 12261199 4475 0.036 74.5 8349844 66.2
/ SRX1036845
Ibuprofen Rep. 3 16928330 6095 0.036 75.4 11695003 67.2
/ SRX1036846
Caffeine Rep. 1 34951436 14330 0.041 79.5 25705235 71.9
/ SRX1029423
Caffeine Rep. 2 39118396 15643 0.04 78.6 28443072 71.5
/ SRX1036843
Caffeine Rep. 3 38445494 14610 0.038 78.1 27621725 70.5
/ SRX1036844

Table 2: Summary of bed bug RNA sequences that mapped to its genome for Ibuprofen and control treatments.

The read count data obtained after the RNA sequencing data were mapped to the bed bug genome and analyzed using Bioconductor programs DESeq and edgeR. The output MA-plot between control (untreated) vs Ibuprofen from DESeq (Figure 1) depicted the log2 fold change of the distribution of the differentially expressed genes. Blue and green lines identified the boundaries of one and two log2 fold change of the genes up or down regulated. The red points identified genes that were significantly differentially expressed (Padj <0.05). When comparing the read count data generated from HTSeq-count for control and Ibuprofen, 670 genes were identified as significantly differentially expressed (Padj <0.05) by the DESeq software, and 1,690 (FDR=0.05) by edgeR (Table 3). The output from DESeq and edgeR indicated that 659 of the genes were common which included 344 significantly differentially up regulated and 315 significantly differentially down regulated genes (Figure 2) The top five species among the BLAST hits obtained from the NCBI nr database search were Bean Bug, Riptortus pedestris F., Red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum Herbst, Pea aphis, Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris, Body louse, P. humanus L., and Jewel wasp, Nasonia vitripennis Walker (Figure 3) Biological and molecular functions of the BLAST genes identified by BLAST2GO are displayed in Figures 4, 5. Metabolic processes, cellular processes and single organism processes accounted for approximately 50% of the biological processes, with gene ontology scores of 284, 251 and 170, respectively. There were 314 genes participated in binding activity, followed by 183 genes in catalytic activities. These top two activities covered greater than 75% of the molecular activities of the genes that were significantly differentially expressed in the Ibuprofen treatment.

  DESeq edgeR      
Comparison (padj<0.05) (FDR <0.05) Intersect Up Reg. Down Reg.
Control vs Ibuprofen 670 1690 659 344 315
Control vs Caffeine 2259 2670 2161 1208 953

Table 3: Summary of differentially gene expression analysis of the bed bug using DESeq and edgeR for comparison of control vs Ibuprofen and Caffeine treatments.

entomology-ornithology-herpetology-DESeq-plotMA-displays

Figure 1: DESeq plotMA displays bed bugs differential expression genes log2 fold change versus means of normalized counts between control and Ibuprofen treated RHB, Red points show significantly expressed genes (adjusted p-value <0.05).Green lines indicate 4-fold changes, inner=less; outer=greater.

entomology-ornithology-herpetology-regulated-genes

Figure 2: The distribution of the log2 fold change significantly expressed genes in bed bugs between control and Ibuprofen treated RHB. Red bars represented down regulated genes, blue bars up regulated genes.

entomology-ornithology-herpetology-Ibuprofen-treatment

Figure 3: Top BLAST hits of the species to which significantly expressed genes in bed bugs in control vs Ibuprofen treatment were mapped.

entomology-ornithology-herpetology-Biological-functions

Figure 4: Biological functions to which significantly expressed genes in bed bugs in control vs Ibuprofen treatment were mapped.

entomology-ornithology-herpetology-Ibuprofen-treatment

Figure 5: Molecular function of the significantly expressed genes in bed bugs in control vs Ibuprofen treatment.

Data on caffeine vs control (untreated) indicated that of the 13,597 genes in the bed bug genome, there were 2,590 genes significantly differentially expressed at the Padj <0.05 from DESeq and 2,670 genes from edgeR. When comparing the output from DESeq and edgeR, 2,161 significantly differentially expressed genes were common, with 1,208 genes significantly differentially up regulated and 953 genes significantly differentially down regulated (Table 3). These genes were searched against the nr database of the NCBI using the BLAST algorithm to identify associated genes for the control vs Ibuprofen treatment. There was 67.42% positive hits of the genes submitted with similarity ranging between 37 -99% to genes in the NCBI nr database.

Output MA-plots from DESeq for control vs caffeine (Figure 6) showed the log2 fold change of the distribution of the differentially expressed genes versus the means of normalized counts. Blue and green lines identify the boundaries of one and two log2 fold change of the genes up or down regulated and red points were of genes that were significantly (Padj <0.05) expressed. The distribution of the significantly differentially expressed genes (Figure 7) indicated that 56% of the significantly differentially expressed genes were up regulated and 44% down regulated.

entomology-ornithology-herpetology-genes-bed-bugs

Figure 6: DESeq plotMA displays differential expression genes in bed bugs log2 fold change versus means of normalized counts between control and caffeine treated RHB, Red points show significantly expressed genes (adjusted p-value <0.05). Green lines indicate 4-fold changes, inner=less; outer=greater.

entomology-ornithology-herpetology-blue-bars-up

Figure 7: The distribution of the log2 fold change significantly expressed genes between control and caffeine treated RHB in bed bugs. Red bars represented down regulated genes, blue bars up regulated genes.

The top species among the five BLAST hit obtained from the NCBI nr database search for the control vs caffeine treatment were Bean bug, R. pedestris, Red flour beetle, T. castaneum, Pea aphis, A. pisum, Body louse, P. humanu and Alfalfa leafcutter bee, Megachile rotundata F. (Figure 8) Biological and molecular functions of the BLAST genes are displayed in Figures 9 and 10, respectively. Metabolic processes, cellular processes and single organism processes accounts for top three biological processes with gene ontology scores of 945, 793 and 535, respectively. There were 997 genes participated in some binding activity, followed by 760 responsible for catalytic activities. These top two activities accounted for greater than 75% of the molecular activities of the genes that were significantly expressed in the caffeine treatment.

entomology-ornithology-herpetology-BLAST-hits-species

Figure 8: Top BLAST hits of the species to which significantly expressed genes from bed bugs in control vs caffeine treatment were mapped.

entomology-ornithology-herpetology-caffeine-treatment

Figure 9: Biological functions to which significantly expressed genes in bed bugs in control vs caffeine treatment were mapped.

entomology-ornithology-herpetology-control-vs-caffeine

Figure 10: Molecular function of the significantly expressed genes in bed bugs in control vs caffeine treatment.

Blast2GO analysis

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway maps represented information on metabolism and various other cell and organism functions. The pathway maps contained a network of molecular interactions and reactions that linked genes in the genome to gene products in the pathway [43,44]. KEGG pathway mapping for control vs Ibuprofen, identified 14 genes and 8 enzymes involved in the purine metabolism pathway, followed by pyrimidine metabolism pathway with 10 genes and 4 enzymes in the control vs Ibuprofen treatments. The enzymes identified in the pyrimidine metabolism pathway were in transferases and hydrolases class and the enzymes identified in the purine metabolism pathway were transferases hydrolases and ligase. Of the 24 genes identified in those two pathways, 19 were significantly differentially down regulated that contained 10 in purine metabolism pathway and 9 in the pyrimidine metabolism pathway. The other five were significantly differentially up regulated, four in purine metabolism pathway and one in the pyrimidine metabolism pathway.

Top KEGG mapping output for control vs caffeine identified 45 genes and 19 enzymes differentially expressed involved in the purine metabolism pathway; 29 of these genes were differentially up regulated and 16 differentially down regulated. In the pyrimidine metabolism pathway there were 22 genes and 9 enzymes, differentially expressed with all the significantly differentially down regulated.

Gene expression validation

Quantitative Real-time PCR resulted from the gene expression validation analysis of the genes tested agrees with data obtained from the RNA sequence analysis. The efficiency of these primers determined on the Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System were 101%, with an R2 value of 0.999 for both validation genes testes (Table 1). There were significant differences in the expression of genes between the control (untreated) and the Ibuprofen treatments. The cytochrome p450 9e2 was highly (19x relative quantization) differentially expressed when compared to the cytochrome p450 9e2 in the control and vitellogenin was expressed at 2x relative quantization in the control, while for Ibuprofen it was at 0.45x relative quantization (Figure 11A) There were also significant differences in the expression of genes between the control and the caffeine treatment. In this case, the cytochrome p450 9e2 was expressed at 0.6x relative quantization in the control and 3x relative quantization in the caffeine. A similar trend was observed for vitellogenin, which was expressed at 0.2x relative quantization in the control and at 0.55x relative quantization for caffeine (Figure 11B).

entomology-ornithology-herpetology-Quantitative-RT-PCR

Figure 11: Quantitative RT-PCR validation of bed bugs genes for (A) Ibuprofen and (B) caffeine (error bars=std. err. Red=significantly differentially down regulated, Blue=significantly differentially up regulated gene) Different letters signify significant differences.

Discussion

This research is the second phase of a study by Narain and Kamble [4] on the biological impacts of Ibuprofen and caffeine on bed bugs, which focused on the differential gene expression in bed bugs 24 hr after ingesting Ibuprofen and caffeine from reconstituted human blood. For the Ibuprofen treatments, there was a 75% mapping rate of the RNA-sequencing to the bed bug genome with 659 genes significantly differentially expressed. Metabolic, cellular and single-organism processes account for greater than 50% of biological functions, while binding and catalytic activities account for greater than 75% of the molecular functions. Most of the genes and enzymes regulated were involved in purine and pyrimidine metabolism. The top significantly differentially down regulated genes were associated with heat stress, while top significantly differentially up regulated genes were stipulated with egg development.

Top KEGG mapping output identified 45 genes and 19 enzymes differentially expressed involved in the purine metabolism pathway, 29 of these genes were differentially up regulated and 16 differentially down regulated. The 19 enzymes were in the following classes: oxidoreductases (subclass acting on CH or CH2 groups); transferases (subclass transferring phosphorus-containing groups); hydrolases (subclass acting on ester bonds, acting on carbon-nitrogen bonds and acting on acid anhydride); and lyases (subclass carbon-nitrogen lyases and phosphorus-oxygen lyases). In the pyrimidine metabolism pathway, there were 22 genes and 9 enzymes differentially expressed with all the significantly differentially down regulated. The nine enzymes were in the following classes: transferases (subclass transferring one-carbon groups and transferring phosphorus-containing groups); hydrolases (subclass acting on ester bonds and acting on carbon-nitrogen bonds, other than peptide bonds); lyases (subclass carbon-oxygen lyases), and ligases (subclass forming carbon-nitrogen bonds).

Among the top 10 significantly differentially up regulated genes were serine protease, homeobox protein, protein 5nuc-like, lipophorin precursor, and three predicted hypothetical proteins. Serine proteases are enzymes that cleave peptide bonds in proteins, with serine at the active site. They are involved in various physiological processes, such as digestion, development, immunity and defense [45,46]. Jayachandran et al. [46] fed a trypsin-like serine protease to cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera Hubner and recorded a 70% reduction in fecundity and 40% larval mortality. In this study, the increase expression of serine protease may have had an impact on the bed bug fecundity because there was a 47% decrease in the number of eggs laid. Homeobox proteins are regulatory genes that act as transcription factors which recognize and bind to specific DNA sequences [47]. They were shown to play key roles in embryogenesis, such as setting up an anterior-posterior gradient in the egg of the fruit fly (D. melanogaster), and in cell differentiation [48]. Not much is known about the protein 5nuc-like, but the nuc-1 protein was shown to facilitate the apoptotic DNA degradation in many cells [49]. Lipophorin functions as the major lipid transport protein between different organs in insects. In the tsetse fly, Glossina morsitans Westwood, the primary nutrients within tsetse milk are lipids and proteins with amino acids and sugars as minor components. Knockdown of lipophorin (gmmlp) by RNA interference resulted in reduced hemolymph lipid levels and delayed oocyte development [50]. In Drosophila spp, lipophorin has lipidlinked morphogens on its surface that are required for long-range signaling activity, control growth and pattern during development [51]. Insects produce and store lipophorin exclusively in the fat body which functions analogously to mammalian liver and participates in detoxification [52]. The insect fat body is also essential in energy storage and utilization. In addition, it is an organ of great biosynthetic and metabolic activity. The fat bodies synthesize most of the hemolymph proteins and circulating metabolites, such as storage proteins used as amino acids reservoir for morphogenesis, or vitellogenins for egg maturation [53]. Up regulation of the lipophorin precursor may have been required for the number of eggs produced, since Ibuprofen was shown to influence egg and ovary development.

For the significantly differentially down regulation, genes associated with heat stress, hsp20, hsp70, and alpha-crystallin b chain, were among the top ten. These genes code for stress protein, which may have responded to the exposure of the bed bugs to the Ibuprofen in their diet.

The overall mapping rate of the RNA-sequencing to the bed bug genome for the caffeine treatment was 78%, with a 71% concordant. Comparison of the differentially expressed genes for control vs caffeine revealed 2161 genes significantly differentially expressed (1,208 up and 953 down) between the control and caffeine treatments. Proteins associated with heat stress (hsp20, hsp70, and alpha-crystallin b chain) were among the top 10 down regulated genes, while among the up regulated genes, were proteins associated with apoptosis immunity and metabolism, such as lipase, lysosomal aspartic protease, and zinc finger protein 512b-like and Kruppel-like. Using RNAi to identify the exact function of a few of the highly differentially expressed genes and control of the regulation of these genes, could aid in bed bug population management.

The top ten genes down regulated in the control vs caffeine treatment were mainly heat shock protein or related proteins (alpha-crystallin b chain). Among the top ten genes up regulated was lipase member m. Lipases are water-soluble enzymes that catalyze the hydrolysis of ester chemical bonds in water-insoluble lipid substrates. Lipase member m is an extracellular lipase, necessary for keratinocyte differentiation. They also function in the metabolism of circulating lipoproteins [54,55]. C-type lectin, which is a superfamily of extracellular proteins with diverse functions, whose most important role is the binding of calcium ion [45,56]. C-type lectin was also involved in cell death (apoptosis) and immune response in the organism [57,58]. Also among the up regulated genes were hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, a ‘shortchain’ dehydrogenases/reductase active on OH-groups of steroids [59]. Additional functions assigned to ‘short-chain’ dehydrogenases/ reductase is in intermediary metabolism, enzymes participating in lipid hormone and mediator metabolism [60]. In addition, there were homeobox proteins in the top 10 up differentially regulated genes. These regulatory genes act as transcription factors that recognize and bind to specific DNA sequences [48]. Another of the top 10 up regulated gene was the lysosomal aspartic protease, whose functions comprise the bulk protein degradation, antigen processing, proprotein processing, prohormone processing, degradation of matrix constituents in the extracellular space, and initiation of apoptotic processes [61]. Completing the top ten up regulated genes for the control vs caffeine treatment were zinc finger protein 512b-like and Kruppel-like factors which are highly related to zinc-finger proteins that are important components of the transcriptional machinery and take part in numerous cellular functions, including cell proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, and neoplastic transformation. Additionally, they function as activators or repressors depending on the promoter or co-regulators with which they interact [62,63]. The caffeine the bed bug consumed may have increased apoptosis, increase cell death may stimulate an immune response, and therefore, this would explain the increase in expression of most of these top 10 up regulated genes.

In conclusion, differential gene expression analysis using Next Generation Sequencing of the bed bug RNA was performed using the first available assembly of the bed bug genome and gene annotation (version 0.5.2). The RNA extraction for the gene expression analysis was done at a single point (24 hr) after the bed bugs were allowed to feed for 45 minutes on 200 ppm Ibuprofein and 40 ppm caffeine in reconstituted human blood. Between 74.5 and 79.6% of all left and right reads were mapped to the bed bug genome. The number of genes differentially expressed varied from 2,161 for control vs caffeine of which 56% were up regulated, to 659 for control vs Ibuprofen treatment (52% up regulated). When the differentially expressed genes were searched against the NCBI nr database, there were a 67.4 and 95.5% hits for control vs caffeine and Ibuprofen, respectively. Gene ontology from BLAST2GO returned R. pedestris (Bean bug) for control vs Ibuprofen and for control vs caffeine.

The RNA sequence data produced from these analyses was submitted to the NCBI and could be used for additional analysis such as identifying splice junctions or isoforms of genes. Also if mapped against the human genome may produce some information, such as blood type. Additionally, it may be able to identify symbionts of the bed bugs. Genes that have been shown to influence egg production in previous studies were also found to be significantly differentially regulated in this study with RNAi technology these genes could be used to help in bed bug management.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Istvan (Steve) Ladunga for his valuable assistance in gene expression analysis and validation. Special thanks to Department of Entomology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE for laboratory facilities and HCC (Holland Computer Center) at University of Nebraska, Omaha, NE for computer resources for data analysis. The University of Nebraska DNA Sequencing Core receives partial support from the NCRR (1S10RR027754-01, 5P20RR016469, RR018788-08) and the National Institute for General Medical Science (NIGMS) (8P20GM103427, P30GM110768). This publication’s contents are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH or NIGMS. This research was supported by the Nebraska Agricultural Research Division and Department of Entomology, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA.

References

  1. Usinger R (1966) Monograph of Cimidae (Hemiptera, Heteroptera). Entomological Society of America, College Park, MD.
  2. Reinhardt K, Siva-Jothy MT (2007) Biology of the bed bugs (Cimicidae). Annu Rev Entomol 52: 351-374.
  3. Snetsinger R (1997) Bed bugs and other bugs. pp. 392-424. In D. Moreland [ed.], Handbook of Pest Control (8th edition). Mallis Handbook and Technical Training Company, GIE Media Inc, Richfield, OH 44286.
  4. Narain RB, Kamble ST (2015) Effects of Ibuprofen and Caffeine Concentrations on the Common Bed Bug (Cimexlectularius L.) Feeding and Fecundity. EntomolOrnitholHerpetol 4: 152.
  5. Budavaria S, O'Neil M, Smith A, Heckelman P. (Eds.) (1997) The Merck index: an encyclopedia of chemicals, drugs, and biologicals (12th Ed.). NJ: Merck. pp 4927.
  6. Kennedy B (2010) Ibuprofen. pp 2044. In Physicians’ desk reference. 64th ed. Montvale, NJ: Thomson PDR.
  7. Fredholm BB, Bättig K, Holmén J, Nehlig A, Zvartau EE (1999) Actions of caffeine in the brain with special reference to factors that contribute to its widespread use. Pharmacol Rev 51: 83-133.
  8. Weidner G, Istvan J (1985) Dietary sources of caffeine. N Engl J Med 313: 1421.
  9. Somogyi L (2010) Caffeine intake by the US population. Food and Drug Administration
  10. CSPINET (Center for Science in the Public Interest) (2013) Caffeine content of food and drugs. December 17, 2013.
  11. Hemingway J, Field L, Vontas J (2002) An overview of insecticide resistance. Science 298: 96-97.
  12. Strode C, Wondji CS, David JP, Hawkes NJ, Lumjuan N, et al. (2008) Genomic analysis of detoxification genes in the mosquito Aedesaegypti. Insect BiochemMolBiol 38: 113-123.
  13. Lee SH, Kang JS, Min JS, Yoon KS, Strycharz JP, et al. (2010) Decreased detoxification genes and genome size make the human body louse an efficient model to study xenobiotic metabolism. Insect Mol Biol. 19:599-615.
  14. Zhu F, Gujar H, Gordon JR, Haynes KF, Potter MF, et al. (2013) Bed bugs evolved unique adaptive strategy to resist pyrethroid insecticides. Scientific Reports 3, Article number: 1456.
  15. Mamidala P, Wijeratne AJ, Wijeratne S, Kornacker K, Sudhamalla B, et al. (2012) RNA-Seq and molecular docking reveal multi-level pesticide resistance in the bed bug. BMC Genomics 13: 6.
  16. Olson JF, Moon RD, Kells SA (2009) Off-host aggregation behavior and sensory basis of arrestment by Cimexlectularius (Heteroptera: Cimicidae). J Insect Physiol 55: 580-587.
  17. Montes C, Cuadrillero C, Vilella D (2002) Maintenance of a laboratory colony of Cimexlectularius (Hemiptera: Cimicidae) using an artificial feeding technique. J Med Entomol 39: 675-679.
  18. Marinotti O, Calvo E, Nguyen QK, Dissanayake S, Ribeiro JM, et al. (2006) Genome-wide analysis of gene expression in adult Anopheles gambiae. Insect MolBiol 15: 1-12.
  19. Dana AN, Hillenmeyer ME, Lobo NF, Kern MK, Romans PA, et al. (2006) Differential gene expression in abdomens of the malaria vector mosquito, Anopheles gambiae, after sugar feeding, blood feeding and Plasmodium berghei infection. BMC Genomics 7: 119.
  20. Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M (2009) RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet 10: 57-63.
  21. Wilhelm BT, Landry JR (2009) RNA-Seq-quantitative measurement of expression through massively parallel RNA-sequencing. Methods 48: 249-257.
  22. Rapaport F, Khanin R, Liang Y, Pirun M, Krek A, et al. (2013) Comprehensive evaluation of differential gene expression analysis methods for RNA-seq data. Genome Biol 14: R95.
  23. Young MD, McCarthy DJ, Wakefield MJ, Smyth GK, Oshlack A, et al. (2012) Differential expression for RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) data: mapping, summarization, statistical analysis, and experimental design. pp. 169-190. In Rodríguez-Ezpeleta N, M. Hackenberg and A. M. Aransay [eds.], Bioinformatics for high throughput sequencing. Springer. New York, NY.
  24. Joshi NA, Fass JN (2011) Sickle: A sliding-window, adaptive, quality-based trimming tool for FastQ files (Version 1.33) [Software]. Available at https://github.com/najoshi/sickle. Accessed 16 December 2013.
  25. Langmead B, Salzberg SL (2012) Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9: 357-359.
  26. Trapnell C, Pachter L, Salzberg SL (2009) TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics 25: 1105-1111.
  27. Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, Pertea G, Kim D, et al. (2012) Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat Protoc 7: 562-578.
  28. Anders S, Huber W (2010) Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol 11: R106.
  29. Dean CB, Nielsen JD (2007) Generalized linear mixed models: a review and some extensions. Lifetime Data Anal 13: 497-512.
  30. Anders S, Huber W (2013) Differential expression of RNA-Seq data at the gene level–the DESeq package
  31. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S (2014) Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15: 550.
  32. Robinson MD1, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK (2010) edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26: 139-140.
  33. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215: 403-410.
  34. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 3389-3402.
  35. Conesa A, Götz S, García-Gómez JM, Terol J, Talón M, et al. (2005) Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics 21: 3674-3676.
  36. Anders S, McCarthy DJ, Chen Y, Okoniewski M, Smyth GK, et al. (2013) Count-based differential expression analysis of RNA sequencing data using R and Bioconductor. Nat Protoc 8: 1765-1786.
  37. Robinson MD, Smyth GK (2007) Moderated statistical tests for assessing differences in tag abundance. Bioinformatics 23: 2881-2887.
  38. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B. 57:289-300.
  39. Duressa D, Anchieta A, Chen D, Klimes A, Garcia-Pedrajas MD, et al. (2013) RNA-seq analyses of gene expression in the microsclerotia of Verticilliumdahliae. BMC Genomics 14: 607.
  40. Zhu F, Sams S, Moural T, Haynes KF, Potter MF, et al. (2012) RNA interference of NADPH-Cytochrome P450 reductase results in reduced insecticide resistance in the bed bug, Cimexlectularius. PLoS ONE 7: e31037.
  41. Rozen S, Skaletsky H (2000) Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Methods MolBiol 132: 365-386.
  42. Untergasser A, Cutcutache I, Koressaar T, Ye J, Faircloth BC, et al. (2012) Primer3--new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res 40: e115.
  43. Kanehisa M, Goto S (2000) KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 27-30.
  44. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Sato Y, Kawashima M, Furumichi M, et al. (2014) Data, information, knowledge and principle: back to metabolism in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res 42: D199-205.
  45. Zou Z, Lopez DL, Kanost MR, Evans JD, Jiang H (2006) Comparative analysis of serine protease-related genes in the honey bee genome: possible involvement in embryonic development and innate immunity. Insect Mol. Biol. 15: 603-614
  46. Jayachandran B, Hussain M, Asgari S (2013) An insect trypsin-like serine protease as a target of microRNA: utilization of microRNA mimics and inhibitors by oral feeding. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 43: 398-406.
  47. Corsetti MT, Briata P, Sanseverino L, Daga A, Airoldi I, et al. (1992) Differential DNA binding properties of three human homeodomain proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 20: 4465-4472.
  48. Burglin TR (1996) Homeodomain Proteins, pp. 55-76. In R. A. Meyers (ed.), Encyclopedia of Molecular Biology and Molecular Medicine Vol 3. Heart failure genetic basis of to mammalian genome. VCH, Verlagsgesellschaft, Weinheim, Germany.
  49. Lai HJ1, Lo SJ, Kage-Nakadai E, Mitani S, Xue D (2009) The roles and acting mechanism of CaenorhabditiselegansDNase II genes in apoptotic dna degradation and development. PLoS One 4: e7348.
  50. Benoit JB, Yang G, Krause TB, Patrick KR, Aksoy S, et al. (2011) Lipophorin acts as a shuttle of lipids to the milk gland during tsetse fly pregnancy. J Insect Physiol 57: 1553-1561.
  51. Panáková D, Sprong H, Marois E, Thiele C, Eaton S (2005) Lipoprotein particles are required for Hedgehog and Wingless signalling. Nature 435: 58-65.
  52. Prasad SV, Fernando-Warnakulasuriya GJ, Sumida M, Law JH, Wells MA (1986) Lipoprotein biosynthesis in the larvae of the tobacco hornworm, Manducasexta. J BiolChem 261: 17174-17176.
  53. Arrese EL, Soulages JL (2010) Insect fat body: energy, metabolism, and regulation. Annu Rev Entomol 55: 207-225.
  54. Wong H, Schotz MC (2002) The lipase gene family. J Lipid Res 43: 993-999.
  55. Toulza E, Mattiuzzo NR, Galliano MF, Jonca N, Dossat C, et al. (2007) Large-scale identification of human genes implicated in epidermal barrier function. Genome Biol 8: R107.
  56. Zelensky AN, Gready JE (2005) The C-type lectin-like domain superfamily. FEBS J 272: 6179-6217.
  57. Weis WI, Taylor ME, Drickamer K (1998) The C-type lectin superfamily in the immune system. Immunol Rev 163: 19-34.
  58. Cambi A, Figdor C (2009) Necrosis: C-type lectins sense cell death. CurrBiol 19: R375-378.
  59. Marekov L, Krook M, Jörnvall H (1990) Prokaryotic 20 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase is an enzyme of the 'short-chain, non-metalloenzyme' alcohol dehydrogenase type. FEBS Lett 266: 51-54.
  60. Oppermann UC, Filling C, Jörnvall H (2001) Forms and functions of human SDR enzymes. ChemBiol Interact 130-132: 699-705.
  61. Brix K (2000) Lysosomal proteases: revival of the sleeping beauty. In: Madame Curie Bioscience Database [Internet]. Austin (TX): Landes Bioscience. Retrived 29 December 2013 from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK6348/.
  62. De Graeve F, Smaldone S, Laub F, Mlodzik M, Bhat M, et al. (2003) Identification of the Drosophila progenitor of mammalian Krüppel-like factors 6 and 7 and a determinant of fly development. Gene 314: 55-62.
  63. Kaczynski J, Cook T, Urrutia R (2003) Sp1- and Krüppel-like transcription factors. Genome Biol 4: 206.
Citation: Narain RB, Wang H, Kamble ST (2015) Differential Gene Expression Profiling in Bed Bug (Cimex Lectularius L.) Fed on Ibuprofen and Caffeine in Reconstituted Human Blood. Entomol Ornithol Herpetol 4:160.

Copyright: © 2015 Narain RB, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top