Poultry, Fisheries & Wildlife Sciences

Poultry, Fisheries & Wildlife Sciences
Open Access

ISSN: 2375-446X

+44-77-2385-9429

Research Article - (2017) Volume 5, Issue 2

Differentiation of Corynebacterium uropygiale strains from Northern Bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) and Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo)

Michael Zhang1, Ming Yang2, Dale Rollins3 and Shuping Zhang2*
1Department of Biomedical Science, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, USA
2Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, USA
3Rolling Plains Bobwhite Research Foundation, Texas Agri Life Research, San Angelo, Texas, USA
*Corresponding Author: Shuping Zhang, Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, USA, Tel: +573 882-6811 Email:

Abstract

Genetic and biochemical characterizations were performed on the bacterial isolates from the intestinal contents of the Northern Bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) in western Texas, USA. The bobwhite bacterial isolates were Gramstain-positive, non-acid fast, catalase-positive, oxidase-negative and non-spore forming rods. The 16S rRNA gene sequences of the bobwhite isolates were identical and showed the highest sequence similarity to Corynebacterium uropygiale (99%) isolated from the wild captive turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) in Germany.
Phylogenetic analysis based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences and the rpoB gene sequences suggested that bobwhite strains belong to Corynebacterium uropygiale. However, DNA-DNA hybridization showed 76.5% relatedness between bobwhite DSM 101879T and C. uropygiale DSM 46817T, indicating that Bobwhite and Turkey strains may represent different subspecies of C. uropygiale. The genetic separation is supported by the distinct biochemical properties of bobwhite and turkey strains. Compared to turkey strains, bobwhite strains have no pyrazinamidase and alkaline phosphatase activities, do not ferment mannitol, and have lower content of fatty acids C18:1 ω9c (27.8%) and 18:0 10-methyl, TBSA (1.0%). To reflect the origin of isolation, the name Corynebacterium uropygiale subsp. colini subsp. nov. is proposed for bobwhite isolates. The type strain is DSM 101879T (=KCTC 49003T).

<

Keywords: Corynebacterium uropygiale; Colinus virginianus; Northern Bobwhite; Biochemical characteristics; Fatty acids profile; Phylogeny

Introduction

The GenBank accession number for 16S rRNA gene sequence and rpoB gene sequence are KY490590 and KY490591, respectively.

The genus Corynebacterium was first described by Lehmann and Neumann [1] and currently comprises more than 130 species. Members of Corynebacterium are Gram-stain positive, non-sporeforming, catalase positive, rod- or irregularly-shaped bacteria [2]. Corynebacterium spp. are widely distributed in nature and possess certain chemotaxonomic features such as the presence of tuberculostearic acid and short chain mycolic acids in cellular fatty acids, menaquinone (MK-8H2) or isoprenoid quinones (MK-9H2) and meso-diaminopimelic acid as components of the cell wall peptidoglycan [3,4]. The organisms are routinely isolated as commensals or pathogens of mammals and birds [5].

The most well characterized species include C. diphtheriae , the etiologic agent of diphtheria [6]; C. pseudotuberculosis, the causative agent of caseous lymphadenitis in sheep and goats and lymphadenitis in horses [7,8] and C. renale group that causes bovine cystitis and pyelonephritis [9]. Over the past two decades, many new species have been isolated from wild birds such as C. kroppenstedtii from a lovebird, C. falsenii and C. aquilae from eagles, C. sphenisci from wild penguins, C. spheniscorum, C. ciconiae from black storks, C. pelargi from white stork nestlings and C. trachiae from a white stork [8,10-15]. In late 2015, C. uropygiale spp. nov. was cultured from the preen gland of captive turkeys in Heidelberg, Germany [16].

Methodology

The Northern Bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) belongs to the order Galliformes which consists of ground-feeding birds, such as chicken and turkey. In a previous study, we characterized the intestinal and respiratory microbiota of wild-caught bobwhite and collected a number of isolates that exhibited morphological and biochemical characteristics of genus Corynebacterium [17].

At the time, these isolates could not be identified to a species level based on phenotypic characteristics, biochemical profiles and 16S rRNA gene sequenced deposited to public databases. In the present study, further biochemical and molecular analyses were carried out which lead to the classification of these isolates to the newly described C. uropygiale [16].

During initial bacterial culture and biochemical characterizations, Corynebacterium jeikeium (ATCC 43734T) was used as a control. C. jeikeium and the bobwhite isolates (n=5) under investigation were stored in 20% glycerol Luria broth (LB) at -80°C. Frozen cultures were inoculated onto Columbia blood agar with 5% sheep blood (Thermo Fisher Scientific Remel Products).

Inoculated agar plates were incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere for 48 h. To ensure purity, bacterial cultures were passaged a second time on agar plates. Pure cultures on agar were used for biochemical and molecular analysis. The colonies of the isolates on Columbia agar with 5% sheep blood were small (approx. 1-1.5 mm in diameter), circular, creamy, opaque with entire edge.

The isolates were Gram-stain positive, rod-shaped, acid-fast stain negative, catalase weak positive and none-spore forming. Phase contrast microscopic examination of 10 h BHI cultures indicated that the organisms were non-motile. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ ionization (MALDI) failed to assign the isolates to any known bacterial species.

The Northern Bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) belongs to the order Galliformes which consists of ground-feeding birds, such as chicken and turkey. In a previous study, we characterized the intestinal and respiratory microbiota of wild-caught bobwhite and collected a number of isolates that exhibited morphological and biochemical characteristics of genus Corynebacterium [17].

At the time, these isolates could not be identified to a species level based on phenotypic characteristics, biochemical profiles and 16S rRNA gene sequenced deposited to public databases. In the present study, further biochemical and molecular analyses were carried out which lead to the classification of these isolates to the newly described C. uropygiale [16].

Carbohydrate fermentation patterns and enzymatic activities of five isolates were examined using API Coryne strip and API ZYM test strips (BioMerieux, Germany), respectively. In brief, API Coryne and API ZYM kits were inoculated with isolated colonies of a pure culture of the control and each isolate was grown for 24 h according to the manufacturer’s instructions (BioMerieux, Germany).

The inoculated biochemistry strips were incubated for 24 h at 37°C in an aerobic, non-carbon dioxide environment. After the addition of appropriate reagents provided in the kit, biochemical reactions were evaluated and the results were recorded. Catalase was weak positive.

The isolates were positive for esterase (C4), esterase lipase (C8), lipase (C14), leucine arylamidase, acid phosphatase, α-glucosidase and β-glucosidase. The isolates reduced nitrate and hydrolyzed aesculin, but not urea or gelatin.

Acid was produced from glucose, ribose, maltose and sucrose, but not from xylose, mannitol, lactose and glycogen. Two of the five isolates had weak pyrazinamidase activity. The isolates showed no activity of pyrrolidonyl arylamidase, alkaline phosphatase, β- glucuronidase, β-galactosidase, N-acetyl-B glucosaminidase, valine arylamidase and cystine arylamidase.

The cellular fatty acids profile of the isolates was determined by Gas Chromatography using the Agilent ChemStation and Sherlock software (Microbial ID, Inc. Newark, DE 19713).

The results showed that the major cellular fatty acids were C16:0 (25.5%), C18:0 (20.1%) and C18:1 ω9c (27.8%). Small amounts of other fatty acids were also present such as C14:0 (1.3%), C17:0 (3.6%), C17:0 cyclo (2.1%), C17:1 ω8c (1.7%), 10-methyl C18:0 (Tuberculostearic acid, 1.0%) and summed feature 3 (C16:1 ω7c/C16:1 ω6c, 2.1%), summed feature 5 (C18:0 ante/C18:2 ω6,9c, 9.4%) and summed feature 8 (C18:1 ω7c/C18:2 ω6c, 4.7%).

Results

The cell wall peptidoglycan structure was determined by DSMZ (Braunschweig, Germany) according to a previously published method [16]. The cross linkage type was meso-Dpm-direct (A1γ) and mesodiaminopimelic acid was the diagnostic diamino acid of the peptidoglycan.

The DNA G+C content was analyzed by HPLC at the DSMZ (Braunschweig, Germany) as described previously [18,19]. In brief, DNA was hydrolyzed with P1 nuclease and nucleotides dephosphorylated as described previously [19]. The resulting deoxyribonucleosides were analyzed by HPLC and the G+C value was calculated according to a previously published method [19]. The G+C content of C110598 was 58.3 %.

Near complete 16S rRNA gene and a 310 bp fragment of a housekeeping gene (rpoB) were amplified by PCR as described previously [20,21]. The 16s rRNA gene sequences of the isolates were identical and shared 99% identity with the 16s rRNA gene sequence of C. uropygiale . Multiple alignments of the 16S rRNA gene sequences (1,500 bp) and rpoB sequence (310 bp) were conducted using Clustal W method [9]. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using the Neighbor-Joining (NJ), maximum-parsimony (MP) and maximumlikelihood (ML) algorithms each with 1000 randomly selected bootstrap replications [22-24].

Comparable tree topology was produced by all methods in which the bobwhite isolates formed one cluster that was closely related to C. uropygiale . The phylogenetic relationship of 16S rRNA gene (Figure 1A) was supported by the rpoB gene tree (Figure 1B). The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1,000 replicates) are shown next to the branches.

poultry-fisheries-wildlife-sciences-phylogenetic-relationship-gene

Figure 1A: The phylogenetic relationship of 16S rRNA gene.

poultry-fisheries-wildlife-sciences-phylogenetic-relationship-gene

Figure 1B: The phylogenetic relationship of 16S rRNA gene was supported by the rpoB gene tree.

Although greater than 99% of similarly has been used as the cutoff value for bacterial species identification, poor discriminatory power for some genera has been reported [25]. To determine the relatedness of bobwhite isolates and C. uropygiale type strain, DNA-DNA hybridization (DDH) between a representative isolate that had been deposited to DSMZ Bacteria Collection (DSM 101879T) and C. uropygiale (DSM 46817T) was carried out by DSMZ (Braunschweig, Germany). Genomic DNA was isolated as described previously [18].

DDH was performed as described previously [25,26]. The result showed 76.5% ± 3.6 similarity between DSM 101879 T and DSM 46817 T, indicating that the turkey and quail isolates may represent separate subspecies of C. uropygiale as DDH values of 79-80% are considered the threshold for defining subspecies [22,27].

The classification of subspecies is supported by the substantial differences in fatty acids composition and biochemical properties between bobwhite and turkey isolates. For instance, bobwhite isolates have much less C18:1 ω9c (27.8%) and C18:0 10-methyl, TBSA (1.0%) than turkey isolates (C18:1 ω9c, 37.4% and C18:0 10-methyl, 10.8%). Bobwhite isolates also have small amounts of C14:0 (1.3%), C17:0 (3.6%), C17:0 2-OH (3.2%) and C17:1 ω8c (1.7%) which were not described for C. uropygiale turkey stains [16]. Contrary to turkey strains, bobwhite isolates lack pyrazinamidase (PYZ) and alkaline phosphatase (PAL) activities and do not produce acid from mannitol. The comparative characteristics of Corynebacterium uropygiale strains are provided in Table 1 [28-30].

Fatty Acids composition* 1 2
C14:0 1.3 N/A
C16:0 25.5 21
C17:0 3.6 N/A
C17:0 cyclo 2.1 N/A
C17:1 ω8c 1.7 N/A
C18:0 20.1 18.5
C18:1 ω9c 27.8 37.4
C18:0 10-methyl, TBSA 1 10.8
Summed feature 3 2.1 N/A
Summed feature 5 9.4 N/A
Summed feature 8 4.7 N/A
Biochemical reactions
Nitra reduction (NIT) + +
Urease - +/-
Aesculin (ESC) + +
Pyrazinamidase (PYZ) - w
Alkaline Phosphatase (PAL) - +
Production of acid from
Mannitol - +
Maltose (MAL) + +
Sucrose + +
Glucose + +
Ribose + +

*Fatty acids with <1% are not shown.
Summed feature 3: C16:1 ω7c/C16:1 ω6c. Summed feature 5: C18:0 ante/C18:2 ω6,9c. Summed feature 8: C18:1 ω7c/C18:2 ω6c. Column 1: Bobwhite C. uropygiale isolate (DSM101879T). Column 2: Turkey C. uropygiale isolate (DSM46817T). (+) positive; (-) negative; w: weakly positive; and N/A: not available.

Table 1: Comparative characteristics of Corynebacterium uropygiale strains isolated from bobwhite and turkey.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the collective results of 16S rRNA gene and rpoB sequencing, phylogenetic study, DDH and phenotypic characterizations suggest that bobwhite isolates belong to species C. uropygiale . While it is interesting to see that bobwhites in Texas, USA and turkeys in Germany share the same Corynebacterium species, the bacterial strains can be differentiated based on the following characteristics: bobwhite strains are negative for pyrazinamidase (PYZ), negative for alkaline phosphatase (PAL), and no acid production from mannitol, as well as low amounts of C18:1 ω9c and C18:0 10-methyl (TBSA) and the summed features 3, 5 and 8. To reflect the differences in host origin, geographic location and phenotypic characteristics, we propose that bobwhite and turkey strains represent two subspecies of C. uropygiale . The name C. uropygiale subsp. colini (co.li'ni. N.L. gen. n. colini of Colinus, scientific name of bobwhites) may be considered for bobwhite strains. The type strain of C. uropygiale subsp. colini. is DSM 101879T (=KCTC49003T). The NCBI GenBank accession number for the 16S rRNA gene sequence is KY490590 and rpoB gene sequence is KY490591.

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the Rolling Plains Quail Research Foundation. The authors thank Dr. Steve Presley, Dr. Anna Gibson, and Dr. Kristan Urban with the Texas Institute of Environmental and Human Health at Texas Tech University for their assistance with sample procurement. The authors thank Ms. Christine Y. Zhang for editing the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lehmann RK, Neumann R (1896) Atlas und grundriss der bakteriologie und lehrbuch der speciellen bakteriologischen diagnostik.
  2. Bernard KA, Funke G (2012) Genus I. Corynebacterium. In: Goodfellow M, Kampfer P, Busse HJ, Trujillo ME, Suzuki K et al. editors. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. London, p: 245.
  3. Couderc F, de Briel D, Demont N, Gilard V, Promé JC (1991) Mass spectrometry as a tool for identifying group D2 corynebacteria by their fatty acid profiles. J Gen Microbiol 137: 1903-1909.
  4. Herrera-Alcaraz EA, Valero-Guillén PL, Martín-Luengo F, Soriano F (1990) Taxonomic implications of the chemical analysis of the D2 group of corynebacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett 60: 341-344.
  5. Holmes RK (2000) Biology and molecular epidemiology of diphtheria toxin and the tox gene. J Infect Dis 181: 156-167.
  6. Sangal V, Hoskisson PA (2016) Evolution, epidemiology and diversity of Corynebacterium diphtheria: New perspectives on an old foe. Infect Genet Evol 43: 364-370.
  7. Dorella FA, Pacheco LG, Oliveira SC, Miyoshi A, Azevedo V (2006) Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis: microbiology, biochemical properties, pathogenesis and molecular studies of virulence. Vet Res 37: 201-118.
  8. Baird GJ, Fontaine MC (2007) Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis and its role in ovine caseous lymphadenitis. J Comp Pathol 137: 179-210.
  9. Yanagawa R (1986) Causative agents of bovine pyelonephritis: Corynebacterium renale, C. pilosum and C. cystitidis. Prog Vet Microbiol Immunol 2: 158-174.
  10. Fernández-Garayzábal JF, Egido R, Vela AI, Briones V, Collins MD, et al. (2003) Isolation of Corynebacterium falsenii and description of Corynebacterium aquilae sp. nov., from eagles. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53: 1135-1138.
  11. Fernández-Garayzábal JF, Vela AI, Egido R, Hutson RA, Lanzarot MP, et al. (2004) Corynebacterium ciconiae sp. nov, isolated from the trachea of black storks (Ciconia nigra). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54: 2191-2195.
  12. Goyache J, Ballesteros C, Vela AI, Collins MD, Briones V et al. (2003) Corynebacterium sphenisci sp. nov., isolated from wild penguins. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53: 1009-1012.
  13. Goyache J, Vela AI, Collins MD, Ballesteros C, Briones V, et al. (2003) Corynebacterium spheniscorum sp. nov, isolated from the cloacae of wild penguins. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53: 43-46.
  14. Kämpfer P, Jerzak L, Bochenski M, Kasprzak M, Wilharm G, et al. (2015) Corynebacterium pelargi sp. nov. isolated from the trachea of white stork nestlings. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 65: 1415-1420.
  15. Kämpfer P, Jerzak L, Wilharm G, Golke J, Busse HJ, et al. (2015) Description of Corynebacterium trachiae sp. nov., isolated from a white stork (Ciconia ciconia). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 65: 784-788.
  16. Braun MS, Zimmermann S, Danner M, Rashid HO, Wink M (2016) Corynebacterium uropygiale sp. nov., isolated from the preen gland of Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo). Syst Appl Microbiol 39: 88-92.
  17. Su H, McKelvey J, Rollins D, Zhang M, Brightsmith DJ, et al. (2014) Cultivable bacterial microbiota of northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus): a new reservoir of antimicrobial resistance? PLoS One 9: e99826.
  18. Cashion P, Holder-Franklin MA, McCully J, Franklin M (1977) A rapid method for the base ratio determination of bacterial DNA. Anal Biochem 81: 461-466.
  19. Mesbah M, Premachandran U, Whitman WB (1989) Precise Measurement of the G+C Content of Deoxyribonucleic Acid by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 39: 159-167.
  20. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Hahnke RL, Petersen JP, Scheuner CS, Michael VM, et al. (2013) Complete genome sequence of DSM 30083T, the type strain (U5/41T) of Escherichia coli, and a proposal for delineating subspecies in microbial taxonomy. Standards in Genomic Sciences.
  21. Packeiser H, Lim C, Balagurunathan B, Wu J, Zhao H (2013) An extremely simple and effective colony PCR procedure for bacteria, yeasts, and microalgae. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 169: 695-700.
  22. Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
  23. Fitch WM (1971) Toward defining the curse of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool 20: 406-416.
  24. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4: 406-425.
  25. Huss VAR, Festl H, Schleifer KH (1983) Studies on the spectrophotometric determination of DNA hybridization from renaturation rates. Syst Appl Microbiol 4: 184-192.
  26. De Ley J, Cattoir H, Reynaerts A (1970) The quantitative measurement of DNA hybridization from renaturation rates. Eur J Biochem 12: 133-142.
  27. Tindall BJ, Rossello-Mora R, Busse HJ, Ludwig W, Kampfer P (2009) Notes on the characterization of prokaryote isolates for taxonomic purposes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 6: 249-266.
  28. Collins MD, Falsen E, Akervall E, Sjöden B, Alvarez A (1998) Corynebacterium kroppenstedtii sp. nov., a novel corynebacterium that does not contain mycolic acids. Int J Syst Bacteriol 48: 1449-1454.
  29. Khamis A, Raoult D, La Scola B (2004) rpoB gene sequencing for identification of Corynebacterium species. J Clin Microbiol 42: 3925-3931.
  30. Schumann P (2011) Peptidoglycan Structure in Taxonomy of Prokaryotes. Methods in Microbiology 38: 101-129.
Citation: Zhang M, Yang M, Rollins D, Zhang S (2017) Differentiation of Corynebacterium uropygiale strains from Northern Bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) and Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo). Poult Fish Wildl Sci 5: 186.

Copyright: ©2017 Zhang S, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top