Journal of Drug Metabolism & Toxicology
Open Access

Drug-Induced Teratogenicity in Animal Models: Translating Research to Human Safety

Rosal Yazar^{* *}Correspondence: Rosal Yazar, Department of Toxicology, California State University, Fresno, USA, Email:

Author info »

Description

Teratogenicity, the capability of substances to cause developmental malformations in embryos or fetuses, is a fundamental concern in pharmacology and toxicology. Understanding how drugs induce teratogenic effects is vital for ensuring the safety of medications prescribed to pregnant women. Animal models play an important role in this research, providing insights into the mechanisms of teratogenicity and informing risk assessments for human safety. This article discusses the importance of studying drug-induced teratogenicity in animal models and the challenges associated with translating these findings to human safety [1]. Teratogenicity refers to the development of congenital malformations due to exposure to teratogens during embryonic or fetal development. Teratogens can be environmental agents, infections, or drugs. The timing of exposure, dosage, and genetic susceptibility significantly influence the outcome of teratogenic effects. Key periods of vulnerability during pregnancy include organogenesis, when the organs are forming, typically during the first trimester [2].

Mechanisms of teratogenicity

The mechanisms by which drugs induce teratogenic effects can vary widely and may include:

Cell death: Certain drugs may cause apoptosis (programmed cell death) in developing tissues.

Disruption of cell signaling: Teratogens can interfere with important signaling pathways necessary for proper development.

Nutrient deprivation: Some drugs can alter maternal metabolism, leading to nutrient deficiencies that affect fetal development [3].

Role of animal models

Animal models are indispensable for studying drug-induced teratogenicity due to their physiological similarities to humans and the ethical limitations of conducting experiments directly on human subjects [4]. Various animal species, including rodents, rabbits, and non-human primates, are used to understand the effects of teratogens [5].

Rodents: Frequently used due to their well-characterized genetics and ease of breeding. They are particularly useful for highthroughput screening of potential teratogens.

Rabbits: Often used in reproductive toxicity studies because of their sensitivity to teratogenic effects and similarities to human fetal development.

Non-human primates: Serve as the closest models to humans and are valuable for studying complex behaviors and developmental processes [6].

Advantages of animal models

Controlled environment animal studies allow researchers to control variables such as dosage, timing, and route of exposure, providing clear insights into teratogenic effects and many animal species have shorter gestational periods, allowing for quicker assessment of developmental outcomes [7]. Genetic manipulation transgenic models can be used to search the genetic basis of teratogenic susceptibility. Complex interactions animal models can mimic the complex interactions of genetic, environmental, and dietary factors that contribute to teratogenicity [8]. Thalidomide is one of the most infamous examples of druginduced teratogenicity. Initially prescribed as a sedative and antiemetic for pregnant women, it caused severe limb deformities and other malformations in thousands of infants during the 1960s. Animal studies revealed that thalidomide disrupted the development of limb buds in rabbits, providing significant insights that informed regulatory actions. Isotretinoin, used to treat severe acne, is another drug with well-documented teratogenic effects [9]. Animal studies demonstrated that isotretinoin caused craniofacial and central nervous system abnormalities in developing embryos. Consequently, stringent regulations and educational programs have been established to prevent its use during pregnancy [10].

Challenges in assessing teratogenicity

While significant advancements have been made in assessing teratogenic potential, challenges remain in the field:

Species differences: The variability between animal models and humans can complicate the translation of findings. Results observed in animal studies may not always predict human outcomes accurately.

Complexity of development: The multifactorial nature of teratogenicity, influenced by genetic, environmental, and maternal factors, makes it difficult to pinpoint the exact causes of developmental defects.

Ethical considerations: While in vitro and computational models help address ethical concerns, there is still a need for responsible use of animal testing to ensure safety. Drug-induced teratogenicity remains a significant area of research in pharmacology and toxicology. Animal models provide fundamental insights into the mechanisms and effects of teratogenic drugs, informing regulatory guidelines and improving human safety. However, challenges in translating findings from animal studies to human contexts necessitate ongoing research and vigilance. By integrating data from animal models with clinical findings and regulatory frameworks, researchers and healthcare providers can work toward minimizing the risks of teratogenicity and ensuring the safe use of medications during pregnancy. Continued advancements in genetic modeling, imaging techniques, and risk assessment will enhance our understanding and prevention of drug-induced teratogenicity in the future.

References

1. King C, Rios G, Green M, Tephly T. UDP-glucuronosyltransferases. Curr Drug Metab. 2000;1(2):143–161.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

2. Sheehan D, Meade G, Foley V, Dowd C. Structure, function and evolution of glutathione transferases: implications for classification of non-mammalian members of an ancient enzyme superfamily. Biochem J.2001;360(1):1–16.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

3. Klein AV, Kiat H. Detox diets for toxin elimination and weight management: A critical review of the evidence. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics. 2015;28(6):675–686.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

4. Dulik DM, Fenselau C. Use of immobilized enzymes in drug metabolism studies. FASEB Journal. 1988; 2(7): 2235–2240.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

5. Danielson P. The cytochrome P450 superfamily: Biochemistry, evolution and drug metabolism in humans. Curr Drug Metab. 2002;3(6): 561–597.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

6. Buckman AH, Wong CS, Chow EA, Brown SB, Solomon KR, Fisk AT. Biotransformation of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) and bioformation of hydroxylated PCBs in fish. Aquat Toxicol. 2006;78 (2):176–185.  

   [Crossref][Google Scholar][Pub Med]

7. Chu S, Covaci A, Schepens P. Levels and chiral signatures of persistent organochlorine pollutants in human tissues from Belgium. Environ Res. 2003;93(2):167–176.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

8. Anezaki K, Nakano T. Unintentional PCB in chlorophenylsilanes as a source of contamination in environmental samples. J Hazard Mater. 2015;287:111–117.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar][PubMed]

9. Bordajandi LR, Abad E, Gonzalez MJ. Occurrence of PCBs, PCDD/Fs, PBDEs and DDTs in Spanish breast milk: Enantiomeric fraction of chiral PCBs. Chemosphere. 2008;70:567–575.

   [Crossref][Google Scholar][PubMed]

10. Brown JF Lawton RW. Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) partitioning between adipose tissue and serum. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1984;33:277–280.

    [Crossref][Google Scholar][PubMed]