Journal of Women's Health Care

Journal of Women's Health Care
Open Access

ISSN: 2167-0420

Research Article - (2018) Volume 7, Issue 1

Effect of Complete Antenatal Care on Birth Weight of Children in India: Evidence from National Family Health Survey (NFHS) Data

Sanjay Jayawant Rode*
Department of Economics, S.K. Somaiya College, Mumbai University, India
*Corresponding Author: Sanjay Jayawant Rode, Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, S.K. Somaiya College, Mumbai University, India, Tel: 9967575703 Email:

Abstract

Prenatal care consists of counseling, medical care and supplementary nutrition. As per WHO guidelines are concerned then all the pregnant women are expected to visit four times to health care staff, hospitals and get the counseling, medical care and supplementary food. We have used National Family Health Survey (NFHS)-1, 2, and 3 data and analyzed such data in STATA@10 software. We found that, lower access to health care facilities; education and poverty, religion and caste background do not support the pregnant women to have minimum four required prenatal visits. The multi-nominal logic regression result shows that poor, illiterate, lower age group, Scheduled caste and Tribe pregnant women do not get the minimum required prenatal care. Such variables are positively correlated and statistically significant with low birth weight babies in India. India has high infant, child mortality, malnutrition and morbidity. Adequate prenatal visits by all pregnant women will certainly reduce the incidence of mortality, illness and malnutrition in country. Government must broadcast prenatal related programs on television and radio. Government must open up more sub centers in villages and in urban areas. Government must promote private clinics/hospitals to provide prenatal care especially to poor pregnant women. Such efforts will certainly improve health status of women and children and reduce the prevalence of child malnutrition, morbidity and mortality in India.

Keywords: Nutrition; Breastfeeding; Healthcare; Malnutrition; Pregnancy; Antenatal care

Introduction

Developing countries have high incidence of neonatal, infant, child mortality and malnutrition [1]. Governments, international organizations and non-government organizations have taken number of steps over the period of time to reduce infant, child mortality and malnutrition and maternal mortality. In India, incidence of child malnutrition and mortality is not declining and still it is observed as very high. High malnutrition among children affects physical and intellectual growth. They become less educated and un-productive adults in the long term. Malnutrition in the long run effects on total productivity, economic growth of country. In order to reduce the low birth weight babies, neonatal, infant mortality and malnutrition, prenatal care is one of the best instruments [2]. The study also indicates that adequate use of prenatal care increases birth weight, holding other factors constant [3]. The maternal health production function explains that early onset of prenatal care and having a minimum number of prenatal care visits is important for improvement in health of mother as well as unborn child.

The prenatal care as per World Health Organization (WHO) consists of four visits by pregnant women to health care facility and health specialists. The four antenatal care ensures adequate nutrition, vitamin intake, proper vaccination, exercise, negative behavioral modification and institutional delivery. Pregnancy constitutes one of the most sensitive period of a women’s life, both physically and mentally [4]. Good care during pregnancy is important for the health of mother and the development of the unborn baby. During pregnancy, healthy behaviors as well as care and parenting skills, medicines are required. Antenatal care is an umbrella term used to describe the medical procedures and care that are carried out during pregnancy. In promoting antenatal care, it is essential that the effectiveness of this service leaves no room for doubt [5]. Prenatal care is a key strategy for achieving public health goals, primary healthcare objectives, and the Millennium Development Goals [6].

During four antenatal visits, the health care facility and skilled health staff certainly plans delivery, understand danger signs during pregnancy through various physical tests and modify unhealthy behaviors and advice healthy diets. The health staff get chance to work for normal delivery. In the literature, it is well documented that those women received four antenatal care have lower rates of maternal and infant mortality as well as good pregnancy outcome. A proper utilization of prenatal care is co-related to high birth weight of babies and gestational age. The preterm deliveries and low birth weight babies contribute neonatal and infant mortality [6,7]. In the literature, it is stated that children of mothers did not receive prenatal care are twice as likely to die during infancy as children of mothers who received prenatal care. Despite the evidence that prenatal care is associated with desirable birth outcomes, it is not an easy step to conclude cost effectiveness. Although, the incidence of low and very low birth weights, premature labor, transfers to acute-care facilities, and early death was significantly greater for those women who had no prenatal care, the combined impact on total cost of care is not large in an absolute sense [8]. The major objective of this paper is to study the impact of prenatal care on birth weight of babies in India [9-13].

Data and Methodology

We collected secondary data from three National Family Health Surveys. The NFHS-1 (1992-1993), NFHS-2 (1998-1999) and NFHS-3 (2005-2006) data is collected in different states in India. International Institute for Population Science provides the state-wise health data with different health indicators. We studied the prenatal care related data from three surveys. We classified and analyzed the prenatal care data in spss@20 and stata@10.

The pregnant woman had either no antenatal visit or they have multiple antenatal visits. We classified the total antenatal visits of each woman in different states and socio-economic characteristics. For the regression, the number of visits took as dependent variable and women’s socio-economic and demographic factors are considered as independent variables. We have used multinomial logit regression model to find the co-relation of dependent variable with independent variable.

Economic Model

We have developed economic model for prenatal care in India. The prenatal visits are categorized as follows:

PV=(NV, OV, TWV, THV, FMV)

The prenatal visits to health care facility and health specialist by pregnant women is categorized as No Visit (NV), One Visit (OV), Two Visits (TWV), Three Visits (THV) and Four or More (FMV) visits. All the pregnant women are expected to visit to health care facility and health care specialist. But due to socio-economic, demographic factors, the pregnant women either do not visit or visit less number of times to health care facility. The variables such as religion, caste, education and place of residence are considered as follows. The education of the women is considered into following categories:

E=(P, S, HS, C)

Education of pregnant women is considered as primary, secondary, high school and college.

R=(H, M, C, S, O)

Religion of pregnant women is categorized as Hindu, Muslim, Christian, Sikh and Others.

Wq=(PST, PER, MLE, RER, RST)

Wealth quintiles of pregnant women are classified as poorest (PST), poorer (PER), middle (MLE), richer (RER), richest (RST).

C=(SC, ST, OBC, O)

Caste background of pregnant women is categorized as Scheduled Caste (SC), Scheduled Tribe (ST), Other Back ward Class (OBC) and Other (O) caste. We have used above variables to examine the prenatal care among pregnant women in selected states in India.

The WHO Recommendations for Prenatal Care

The World Health Organization recommends (WHO) 9 at least four antenatal visits to health care facility during pregnancy of each women. We have used such standards for this study. The first visit is recommended before the end of the first trimester or before 12 weeks of pregnancy. The first visit to health care facility is expected to take 30-40 minutes. In this visit, pregnant woman’s medical and obstetric history is collected, certain physical examinations are done and some advice is given to avoid certain risks during pregnancy. The second visit is recommended during the 2nd trimester or 24-26 weeks.

It takes around 20 minutes. Blood test measurement, uterine height and some tests for urinary infection are performed in this period. The third visit should take place around the 32nd week and it is supposed to take place for 20 minutes. Routine check-up and any necessary test are recommended in this period. If the 2nd visit is missed then all test of 2nd visit should be performed during 3rd visit. The period of third visit should comprise as 32 weeks. The fourth or final visit should take place between 36 and 38 weeks. At this time, the fetus’s condition will be checked and if any abnormality found then the mother is advised to go to an obstetrician.

Health Care during Prenatal Visits

During four visits, variety of enquiries, testes, check-ups are conducted and advices are given to pregnant women and relatives. Usually the first contact of women to the health care staff takes place to confirm pregnancy. Suppose the pregnancy is confirmed then antenatal care should start immediately. Antenatal care (ANC) services are considered to be the key element in the primary health care delivery system of a country, which aims for a healthy society.

Over the past 60 years, the maternal health situation in the country has been staggering despite several changes in a rapidly evolving socioeconomic environment. The roles and responsibilities of primary care physicians have also been revised continuously in this context. Under their leadership, different cadres of health workers have been appointed to address the problem [10]. Therefore this study is making an attempt to understand the antenatal care among pregnant women and information provided about antenatal care to pregnant women.

Access and Visits of Prenatal Care in India

The prenatal access is very low among pregnant women in India. The doctors, nurses and midwives are the main providers of antenatal care. But they do not know potential barriers to utilization of antenatal care services. There are many barriers in utilization of prenatal care. Health care staff must be sensitive to women’s socio-economic situation and their cultural and traditional beliefs and their communication skills. We have computed the total antenatal visits of each pregnant woman to health care facilities in India (Table 1).

Survey Area No ANC Three ANC visits Four and above ANC
NFHS-1 Rural 40.97 38.81 20.22
Urban 17.19 33.29 49.52
NFHS-2 Rural 36.36 39.05 24.59
Urban 11.55 29.91 58.54
NFHS-3 Rural 19.67 41.29 39.05
Urban 8.94 25.49 65.57

Table 1: The prenatal visits by pregnant women in India (%).

Above table shows that in NFHS-1, around 40.97% women never received ante-natal care in rural area. The coverage of antenatal care is very low due to location of health care facilities. But in urban area, women without antenatal care are only 17.19% in NFHS-1. In NFHS-2, 36.36% women never received any antenatal care in rural area. In this survey, small increase in prenatal care is observed. It may be because of awareness of health care and development of transportation and communication technology.

In the urban area, 11.55% pregnant women never received any antenatal care at all. In the NFHS-3 survey, 19.67% pregnant women have not received antenatal care. In urban area, health care access is more. Therefore, only 8.94% of pregnant women have not received antenatal care. The coverage of antenatal care is higher in urban area as compare to rural area in India. It is simply because health facilities in rural area are located far away. The pregnant women cannot travel long distance for antenatal care.

In urban area, health care facilities are not far away. Therefore, access and utilization of antenatal care is more. We have also measured the outcome of the prenatal care. The study has pointed out the birth weight and that a delays in antenatal care. The study states that delay in obtaining prenatal care or receiving no prenatal care have been associated with increased frequencies of low birth weight and other adverse pregnancy outcomes [11].

We have studied the relationship of different socio-economic factors with the antenatal care of pregnant women. We have studied the prenatal care among pregnant women in relation to standard of living index. The standard of living index consists of holding various assets by the family members of pregnant women. The score of different assets is given as standard of living index (Table 2).

SLI No ANC Three ANC Four ANC
Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban
Low 49.9 29.6 38.1 21.65 24 7.1
Medium 44.9 55.61 50.6 53.67 51.8 43.86
High 5.23 14.8 11.4 24.68 24.3 49.04

Table 2: Prenatal visits according to standard of living Index in NFHS-2 (%).

The table shows that half of pregnant women from rural area with low standard of living index had not received antenatal check-ups. Poverty is the main reason of not getting the four antenatal care. But only 5.23% pregnant women from high standard of living index had not received antenatal care. In urban area, 55.61% pregnant women with medium standard of living index have not received any antenatal care. Half of pregnant women from rural area with medium standard of living index have received three antenatal cares. In urban area, 53.67% of pregnant women have received the three antenatal care. As far as four antenatal cares are concerned then 51.75% pregnant women of medium standard of living index have received four antenatal cares. In urban area, 49.04% of pregnant women of high standard of living index have received four antenatal cares. It means that women of higher socioeconomic status are more likely to receive early and adequate prenatal care, compared to those of a lower socio-economic status. In fact, continuity of care during pregnancy is influenced by financial resources and social support. Above data and results also show that poor pregnant women from rural area have either no or few visits of antenatal care. We have also studied the coverage of prenatal care as per the wealth quintile of households of pregnant women in India. The results are presented in the following table (Table 3).

Wealth quintile No ANC Three ANC Four ANC
Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban
Poorest 42 13.17 28.6 4.43 10 0.94
Poorer 30.6 19.49 27.8 11.29 16.6 2.97
Middle 19.2 27.73 24 21.79 26 10.64
Richer 7.09 27.89 15 36 27.2 27.46
Richest 1.18 11.71 4.69 26.49 20.2 57.98

Table 3: Prenatal visits according to wealth quintile in NFHS-3 (%).

It is found that 41.97% pregnant women of poorest quintile of rural area have not visited for any antenatal care. In urban area, 27.89% of pregnant women of richer quintile have not visited for prenatal care. It means they have missed all four tests which are performed during pregnancy. In poorest quintile, the 28.59% pregnant women have received three antenatal cares. Only 4.69% pregnant women of richest quintile in rural area have received three antenatal cares. In the urban area of country, 4.43% pregnant women of poorest quintile have received three antenatal cares as far as NFHS-3 data is concerned. Only 10.03% pregnant women of poorest quintile have received four antenatal cares in rural area. Such coverage of four antenatal cares is very low among poor women.

The 20.22% pregnant women of richest quintile in rural area have received four antenatal cares. The 2.97% pregnant women of poorer quintile of urban area have received four antenatal cares. The 57.98% women of richest quintile of urban area have received four antenatal check-ups. We have also considered the age related factor of pregnant women for antenatal care in India. One key medical and health issue of adolescent reproduction is its association with poor pregnancy outcomes for the mother and child. The study 12 has compared to women of more mature age, pregnancy and childbearing during the teen years have been observed to present much higher risks of low birth weight, neonatal mortality, infant mortality and pregnancyrelated medical complication. This study is more practical and significant for birth outcome (Table 4).

Age group  Region NFHS-1 NFHS-2 NFHS-3
No ANC Three ANC visits Four and above ANC No ANC Three ANC visits Four and above ANC No ANC Three ANC visits Four and above ANC
15-19 R 38.82 39.7 21.48 37.02 41.22 21.76 22.76 49.15 28.09
U 35.89 39.89 24.23 12.41 42.11 45.49 11.19 36.06 52.75
T 37.21 39.8 22.99 32.83 41.37 25.8 19.74 45.74 34.52
20-24 R 37.11 38.65 24.24 34.1 40.28 25.62 19.44 44.81 35.75
U 31.42 38.16 30.43 10.62 31.53 57.85 8.17 28.12 63.71
T 33.83 38.36 27.8 28.09 38.04 33.86 15.27 38.64 46.09
25-29 R 40.52 35.51 23.97 38.66 36.97 24.36 22.83 40.36 36.81
U 32.68 34.35 32.97 10.52 26.22 63.26 7.74 24.06 68.2
T 35.9 34.82 29.28 30.47 33.84 35.68 16.31 33.32 50.37
30-34 R 48.64 31.54 19.82 46.58 34.19 19.23 27.95 39.4 32.64
U 40.2 30.41 29.39 12.51 28.94 58.55 8.65 22.35 69
T 43.7 30.88 25.42 36.84 32.69 30.47 19.59 32.02 48.39
35-39 R 56.98 28.76 14.27 52.72 31.97 15.3 37.51 36.14 26.35
U 49.02 29.92 21.06 18.63 27.94 53.43 13.1 25.27 61.63
T 52.43 29.42 18.15 44.32 30.98 24.7 28.38 32.08 39.54
40-44 R 58.94 28.14 12.93 58.1 29.89 12.01 44.82 37.63 17.56
U 54.09 28.12 17.79 19.4 38.81 41.79 22.09 27.13 50.78
T 56.25 28.13 15.62 52 31.29 16.71 37.97 34.46 27.57
45-49 R 68.6 23.67 7.73 59.79 28.87 11.34 58.14 25.58 16.28
U 65.29 22.73 11.98 33.33 55.56 11.11 36.17 27.66 36.17
T 66.82 23.16 10.02 57.55 31.13 11.32 53.42 26.03 20.55

Table 4: Age of women and prenatal visits (%).

In NFHS-1, 65.29% pregnant women of 45-49 age groups have not received any antenatal care. In NFHS-2, nearly 57.55% pregnant women of 45-49 age groups have not received any antenatal care. In NFHS-3, 53.42% of same age group has not received any antenatal care. It means pregnant women without antenatal care are declining but it is declining at very lower rate. In NFHS-1, nearly 38.81% women of 15-19 age groups have received up to three antenatal care. In NFHS-2, 39.05% women of 15-19 age groups have received up to three antenatal care. In NFHS-3, 41.29% women of same age group have received up to three antenatal care. NFHS-1 data shows that, 32.97% pregnant women of 25-29 age groups have received four and above antenatal care.

The NFHS-2 shows that, 35.68% pregnant women of 25-29 age groups have received four and above antenatal care. In NFHS-3, 50.37% pregnant women of 25-29 age group have received three and above antenatal care. It means the antenatal care is increasing among pregnant women in India over the period of time. But there is need of more coverage of prenatal care. Health care staff must take more efforts for providing universal antenatal care in urban and rural area. Most of the time, health care staff is not available in hospitals for antenatal care. The four antenatal visits by pregnant women are also depends on the educational attainment. Highly educated women have more antenatal care as compare to illiterate and less educated women (Table 5).

Education Region NFHS-1 NFHS-2 NFHS-3
No ANC Three ANC visits Four and above ANC No ANC Three ANC visits Four and above ANC No ANC Three ANC visits Four and above ANC
Illiterate R 52.97 33.99 13.05 44.65 38.36 16.98 26.32 50 23.68
U 50.04 35 14.96 22.58 29.03 48.39 30 30 40
T 51.37 34.54 14.09 41.05 36.84 22.11 27.08 45.83 27.08
Primary R 25.27 43.39 31.34 18.99 42.95 38.06 14.69 39.87 45.44
U 21.56 43.08 35.36 5.34 27.91 66.75 4.6 23.77 71.62
T 23.11 43.21 33.68 14.25 37.72 48.03 10.02 32.42 57.56
Secondary R 12.56 36.77 50.67 19.36 37.41 43.22 10.12 36.03 53.85
U 8.95 32.89 58.16 3.86 20.89 75.25 3.14 17.78 79.08
T 10.22 34.25 55.52 12.48 30.08 57.43 6.39 26.27 67.34
High Secondary R 3.09 19.75 77.16 5.74 24.36 69.89 2.19 18.88 78.93
U 1.46 13.17 85.36 0.77 12.66 86.57 0.7 8.21 91.09
T 1.72 14.22 84.06 2.55 16.85 80.59 1.03 10.58 88.39

Table 5: Women’s education and prenatal visits (%).

In NFHS-1, only 14.09% illiterate pregnant women have received four or more antenatal care. In NFHS-2, it has increased up to 22.11%. In NFHS-3, 27.08% pregnant women have received four and above antenatal care. Illiterate women do not know much about minimum required antenatal care during pregnancy. Most of the time, they avoid the prenatal cares. In NFHS-1, 33.68% pregnant women have received four and above antenatal care but they are primary studied. In NFHS-2, 48.03% primary studied pregnant women have received four and above antenatal care.

In NFHS-3, 57.56% pregnant women have received four and above antenatal care. Nearly 55.52% secondary studied pregnant women have received four and above antenatal care. In NFHS-2, the prenatal coverage among pregnant women has increased. In this survey, 57.43% pregnant women have received four and above antenatal care. In NFHS-3, 67.34% secondary studied women have received four and above antenatal care. The 84.06% higher secondary studied pregnant women have received three and above antenatal care in NFHS-1.

In NFHS-2, 80.59% pregnant women have received four and above antenatal care. As far as NFHS-3 is concerned then 88.39% pregnant women have received four and above antenatal care and they are higher secondary studied. It means with increase in education, the antenatal care is also increases. The religious factors are also important in use of prenatal care by pregnant women (Table 6).

Religion Region NFHS-1 NFHS-2 NFHS-3
No ANC Three ANC visits Four and above ANC No ANC Three ANC visits Four and above ANC No ANC Three ANC visits Four and above ANC
Hindu R 42.21 36.04 21.75 39.6 38.57 21.83 22.05 43.38 34.57
U 35.72 35.33 28.95 11.45 30.01 58.54 7.56 24.24 68.19
T 38.49 35.64 25.87 32.83 36.51 30.65 16.53 36.1 47.37
Muslim R 45.46 34.84 19.7 42.44 33.07 24.49 28.89 39.7 31.41
U 38.13 35.21 26.66 15.87 33.52 50.62 14.28 29.62 56.1
T 41.01 35.06 23.93 33.25 33.22 33.53 21.81 34.81 43.38
Christian R 40.32 28.68 31 30.11 39.34 30.56 36.99 34.31 28.7
U 31.8 27.55 40.66 2.83 25.85 71.32 9.13 30.02 60.84
T 35.37 28.02 36.61 22.34 35.5 42.16 26.84 32.74 40.42
Sikh R 14.83 55.51 29.66 28.95 35.52 35.52 12.71 30.63 56.67
U 12.36 51.11 36.53 8.86 12.66 78.48 0.64 9.62 89.74
T 13.42 52.99 33.59 23.37 29.17 47.45 9.75 25.47 64.78
Other R 54.23 25.71 20.06 42.13 41.7 16.17 28.57 38.22 33.2
U 41.54 28.09 30.37 5.88 29.41 64.71 3.7 17.28 79.01
T 46.73 27.12 26.15 33.99 38.94 27.06 19 30.17 50.83

Table 6: Prenatal visits and religion (%).

In Hindu religion, only 25.87% pregnant women have received four and above antenatal care in NFHS-1. But in same survey, 23.93% women of Muslim religion have received four and more antenatal care. In NFHS-2, only 30.65% women of Hindu religion have four and more antenatal care. They must have more access to health care facilities.

But utilization of antenatal care is very low. The 47.45% pregnant women of Sikh religion have four and more antenatal care. In NFHS-3, 64.78% pregnant women of Sikh religion have received four and more antenatal care.

In NFHS-1 and 2, pregnant women from Hindu religion have received consistently lower access to antenatal care in India (Table 7).

Ethnicity  Region NFHS-1 NFHS-2 NFHS-3
No ANC Three ANC visits Four and above ANC No ANC Three ANC visits Four and above ANC No ANC Three ANC visits Four and above ANC
Scheduled Caste  R 45.16 37.77 17.07 42.12 39.09 18.78 25.04 45.98 28.97
 U 40.97 38.81 20.22 15.97 38.88 45.15 10.45 33.25 56.3
 T 42.82 38.35 18.83 36.36 39.05 24.59 19.67 41.29 39.05
Scheduled Tribe  R 54.77 31.29 13.94 45.07 40.55 14.38 34.96 42.43 22.61
 U 50.69 31.74 17.57 11.58 33.12 55.31 11.42 34.02 54.56
 T 52.59 31.53 15.88 40.09 39.45 20.46 29.6 40.52 29.88
Other Backward Classes  R 38.52 36.4 25.08 39.74 35.65 24.61 24.84 42.48 32.68
 U 31.61 35.07 33.32 12.84 28.53 58.63 12.35 26.23 61.42
 T 34.44 35.62 29.94 33.52 34 32.48 20.08 36.29 43.63

Table 7: Prenatal visits and ethnicity (%).

In NFHS-1, around 42.82% pregnant women of Scheduled Caste background have not received any antenatal care. The 36.36% female of Schedule Caste have not received antenatal care in NFHS-2. In NFHS-3, 19.67% women have not received any antenatal care. The number of women may have low birth weight babies, neonatal and infant mortality. In NFHS-1, nearly half of pregnant women of Scheduled Tribe (50.69%) have not received any antenatal care in India. The awareness and access of prenatal is very low among such women. In NFHS-2, 40.09% women of Scheduled Tribe have not received any antenatal care. In NFHS-3, 29.60% pregnant women of Scheduled Tribe have not received any antenatal care. The access to prenatal is increasing but it is increasing at very rate. As far as Other Backward Caste is concerned, then 34.44% pregnant women have not received any antenatal care. In NFHS-2, 33.52% pregnant women have not received any antenatal care. In NFHS-3, 20.08% pregnant women have not received any antenatal care of this caste. It means pregnant women with different ethnic background; the access to prenatal care is increasing but it is increasing at very slow rate in India.

The Multi-nominal Logit Regression Results

We have used multinomial logit regression model 13 to understand the different socio-economic and demographic factors responsible for antenatal care among pregnant women in India. The regression model is defined as follows.

image

Where for the ith women, yi is the observed outcome and Xj is a vector of explanatory variable. The parameters Bj are estimated by maximum likelihood. The positive and negative parameters are compared with the reference category of pregnant women those had four prenatal cares. The results are presented in the following table (Table 8).

NFHS-1 Rural Urban
No ANC Three ANC No ANC Three ANC
Variables Co-efficient Z-test Co-efficient Z-test Co-efficient Z-test Co-efficient Z-test
13-14 -3.67** (1.15) 10.14 -0.45 (0.63) 0.52 -2.03** (0.64) 10.04 -0.18 (0.51) 0.12
15-19 -0.0915 16.51 -0.17 (0.15) 1.23 -0.0564 15.03 -0.01 (0.13) 0.01
20-24 -0.042 17.83 -0.14 (0.10) 1.92 -0.0272 17.75 -0.04 (0.08) 0.21
25-29 -0.0196 14.78 -0.12 (0.07) 2.34 -0.0138 15.16 -0.04 (0.65) 0.52
30-34 -0.18** (0.06) 8.81 -0.09 (0.06) 2.14 -0.14** (0.04) 9 -0.04 (0.04) 0.75
35-39 -0.10*** (0.05) 3.79 -0.06 (0.05) 1.29 -0.06*** (0.04) 2.75 -0.01 (0.04) 0.1
40-44 -0.09** (0.04) 4.17 -0.05 (0.04) 1.28 -0.07*** (0.03) 3.63 0.02 (0.00) 0.47
Illiterate -0.17 (0.39) 0.19 -0.74*** (0.38) 3.7 -0.14 (0.34) 0.16 -0.2574 5.55
Primary -0.636 16.23 -1.23** (0.38) 10.19 -0.544 21.45 -1.28** (0.33) 14.92
Secondary -0.9438 37.42 -0.627 18.28 -2.60 (0.34) 56.38 -0.594 29.53
High secondary -1.8792 41.28 -0.9143 28.7 -1.616 98.4 -0.9588 68.15
Hindu 0.21* (0.05) 13.46 0.09 (0.05) 2.54 0.12** (0.04) 6.94 0.06 (0.04) 1.97
Muslim 0.16** (0.09) 3.33 -0.0208 9.83 0.08 (0.08) 1.14 -0.0217 18.45
Christian -0.1274 56.88 0.24* (0.09) 7.18 -0.95* (0.11 64.27 0.21** (-0.07) 7.54
Sikh 0.25** (0.14) 3.06 -0.26*** (0.14) 3.1 0.28** (0.12) 4.87 -0.12 (0.11) 1.13
Scheduled caste 0.08*** (0.05) 2.55 0.09** (0.05) 3.13 0.13** (0.04) 7.59 0.14** (0.04) 10.3
Scheduled tribe 0.79* (0.06) 151.57 0.45* (0.06) 48.29 0.92* (0.06) 242.71 0.52* (0.05) 78.96
Lbw -0.0264 685.66 -0.0036 648.76 -0.0168 1063.29 -0.0034 1029.89
Intercept 2.56* (0.49) 26.88 2.13* (0.49) 18.49 2.18* (0.41) 27.07 1.81* (0.41) 18.88
-2log likelihood=3169.19 Chi2=7194.97 -2log likelihood=3169.19 Chi2=7194.97
Sig=0.00 Cox and Snell=0.23 Sig=0.00 Cox and Snell=0.23
Nagelkerke=0.26 McFadden=0.12 Nagelkerke=0.26 McFadden=0.12

Table 8: Multi-nominal regression results of prenatal visits with NFHS-1 [@*significant at 1%, **significant at 5%, *** significant at 10%].

The pregnant women without antenatal care in NFHS-1 are positively co-related with women of Hindi, Muslim and Sikh religion. The pregnant women of Christian religion have negative relationship with no antenatal care. The women of Christian community visit to health care facilities. Therefore such women have complete antenatal care. But there is possibility that the other women may not have antenatal check-ups. Therefore the no antenatal visits are positively corelated with women of Hindi, Muslim and Sikh religion. The pregnant women of scheduled tribe caste have no antenatal care. The relationship with no antenatal care is statistically significant and positively co-related. The health care facilities are located far away. The pregnant women do not have access to such facilities. They do not have knowledge about required antenatal care during pregnancy. As far as age of the pregnant women is concerned then no antenatal care is negatively co-related to all age group categories. It is clear that antenatal care is not provided on the basis of age. Any age category pregnant women can get the complete antenatal care in all health care facilities. Therefore, based on the age group of pregnant women, there is no difference in antenatal care. That is the reason where no antenatal care is negatively co-related and statistically significant. The pregnant women with primary, secondary and higher secondary school have negative co-relationship with no antenatal care. Any woman with more than primary education has more antenatal visits.

Therefore, it is negatively co-related and statistically significant. The lower weight babies have negative co-relationship with no antenatal care. The women of Muslim and Sikh religion do not have adequate prenatal care. No antenatal care is negatively co-related with women of Muslim and Sikh religion. The women of Christian religion have three antenatal care visits. It is statistically significant and positively corelated. The women of the scheduled caste and tribe have positive corelationship with three antenatal care. The women of scheduled caste and tribe are economically poor. They do not have knowledge of required antenatal care. An access to health care facilities is also low. Due to high opportunity cost of time, they do not visit health care facilities and get the four antenatal cares. Therefore it is positively corelated and statistically significant. The illiterate, primary, secondary and higher secondary educated women have negative co-relationship with three antenatal care. There is no difference in three antenatal cares as far as education of women is concerned. The three antenatal cares is negatively co-related and statistically significant with low birth weight babies. During pregnancy, the women have not visited four times to health care facilities. Therefore, the women delivered low birth weight babies. In order to have healthy child, at least four antenatal visits are required by each pregnant woman. But it is negatively co-related and statistically significant.

In the urban area of county, no antenatal care is positively correlated to women of Hindu religion. The women of Hindu religion have not visited for antenatal care to hospitals in urban area. That is why it could be negatively co-related and statistically significant. The pregnant women of Christian religion have negatively co-relationship with no antenatal care. They have knowledge of minimum required prenatal care. Therefore, they visit to health care facilities and health specialist. That is why the relationship is negatively co-related and statistically significant. The women of Sikh religion in urban area have negative corelationship with no antenatal care. The women of scheduled caste and tribe have positive co-relationship with antenatal care. This is mainly because the women from such community are poor and they have less educational achievement and knowledge. They have also less knowledge of health care facilities and required antenatal care during pregnancy.

Therefore, it is positively co-related and statistically significant. The women of all age groups have negative co-relationship with antenatal care. There is no any discrimination in prenatal care on the basis of age of pregnant women. Any pregnant women can get the prenatal care in each health care facility. Therefore, it is statistically significant and negatively co-related with no antenatal care. The women with primary, secondary and higher secondary are negatively co-related with no antenatal care. The pregnant women with primary and secondary education can visit health care facility for prenatal care. Therefore they can have more than one antenatal care but certainly they do not have zero antenatal care. The low birth weight is negatively co-related with the no antenatal care (Table 9).

Variables Rural Urban
No ANC visits Three ANC visits No ANC visits Three ANC visits
Co-efficient Z test Co-efficient Z test Co-efficient Z test Co-efficient Z test
15-19 0.77*** (0.44) 3.08 -0.28 (0.41) 0.48 -1.32 (1.24) 1.14 -0.90 (1.14) 0.63
20-24 -0.4452 6.44 -0.00 (0.40) 0 -1.26 (1.23) 1.04 -1.19 (1.13) 1.1
25-29 -0.4961 8.49 -0.22 (0.40) 0.3 -1.28 (1.29) 1.08 -1.37 (1.13) 1.44
30-34 -0.4662 7.05 -0.30 (0.40) 0.55 -1.09 (1.23) 0.98 -1.19 (1.14) 1.1
35-39 -0.91** (0.42) 4.6 -0.23 (0.40) 0.32 -0.82 (1.24) 0.43 -1.26 (1.14) 1.22
40-44 -0.96 (0.45) 1.02 0.08 (0.43) 0.03 -0.84 (1.29) 0.42 -0.84 (1.17) 0.5
Illiterate 0.35 (0.82) 0.18 -0.33 (0.79) 0.18 -0.77 (0.49) 2.46 -0.89** (0.44) 4.1
Primary -0.148 494.93 -0.0465 294.54 -0.176 262.67 -0.0574 128.01
Secondary -0.224 494.93 -0.063 454.57 -0.2665 240.25 -0.088 185.97
Higher secondary - - - - -15.79 (74422.58) 0 -16.94 (4617.35 0
Hindu -0.3052 14.33 -0.41*** (0.21) 3.96 0.75 (0.59) 1.6 0.43 (0.36) 1.42
Muslim -0.61** (0.29) 4.33 -1.09 (0.21) 0.25 0.83 (0.60) 1.88 -0.50 (0.37) 1.8
Christian -0.56*** (0.29) 3.61 -0.16 (0.21) 0.59 -0.25 (0.65) 0.15 0.29 (0.37) 0.62
Sikh -2.92** (1.05) 7.74 -1.27** (0.34) 13.41 0.36 (0.67) 0.28 -0.61 (0.44 1.92
Buddhist -0.8164 8.96 -0.294 10.76 0.54 (0.82) 0.44 0.37 (0.46) 0.65
Jain -1.84*** (1.05) 3.05 -0.7752 8.9 1.03 (0.97) 1.12 -0.47 (0.65) 0.52
Jewish -16.22 (0.00) 1.03 -16.29 (677.75) 0 -13.07 (0.00) 0 -15.37 (654.35) 0
No religion -17.66 (39.64) 0 -0.45 (1.03) 0.19 -1.97*** (1.12) 3.07 0.85 (0.77) 1.21
Scheduled caste 1.36 (0.22) 38.43 1.16* (0.13) 76.23 -1.30** (0.60) 4.72 -0.5457 4.36
Scheduled tribe 1.44 (0.23) 37.41 1.15* (0.14) 64.55 -0.29 (0.31) 0.88 -0.42 (0.26) 2.57
Other backward caste 1.44 (0.20) 48.55 0.85* (0.12) 45.26 -0.8201 5.46 -1.41** (0.51) 7.57
None of above 0.79 (0.21) 14.32 0.61* (0.12) 23.52 -0.9735 7.7 -1.45** (0.51) 8.03
Lbw 1.43 (0.06) 512.08 0.71* (0.02) 609.62 -0.3042 403.98 -0.336 469.51
Intercept -6.17 (0.60) 105.3 -1.6121 52.01 -2.40 (1.47) 2.64 2.86 (1.29) 4.9
-2log likelihood=1319.30 McFadden=0.11 -2log likelihood=2458.70 McFadden=0.181
Sig=0.00 Chi2=727.84 Sig=0.00 Chi2=2516.13
Nagelkerke=0.24 Cox and Snell=0.21 Nagelkerke=0.338 Cox and Snell=0.285

Table 9: The regression results for antennal care in NFHS-2 [@*significant at 1%, **significant at 5%, ***significant at 10%].

Age of the women is positively co-related to no antenatal visits. In India, girls get marry at early age. After marriage, women conceive too early. They do not have knowledge of contraceptives. The antenatal care is not observed among the young women. During pregnancy, they do not visit to health care facilities. Therefore, the antenatal care among different age groups is negatively co-related to no antenatal visits. They do not visit regularly to health care facilities. Therefore, no antenatal visits by pregnant women in all age groups are statistically significant and negatively co-related. The women with primary and secondary education have negative relationship with no antenatal visits. Women are not discriminated on the basis of education. They easily get the antenatal care in public or private health care facilities.

Therefore, primary and secondary education of pregnant women is negatively co-related with no antenatal visits. The religion of pregnant women of Hindu, Muslim, Christian, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain and no religion is negatively co-related to no antenatal visits. The antenatal care is not discriminated on the basis of religion of women in India. All pregnant women of different religion have equal access to health care facilities. Therefore, it is negatively co-related and statistically significant. The women of scheduled caste, tribe, Other Backward Class (OBC) and none of above religion have negative co-relationship with no antenatal visits. The women of any caste background have negative co-relationship with prenatal care. The women of scheduled caste, tribe and other backward caste are poor. They do not have knowledge of minimum required antenatal care. They do not visit to health care facilities.

Therefore, no antenatal visits are negatively co-related and statistically significant. The lower birth weight of children is positively co-related to no antenatal visits. The pregnant women during pregnancies do not get antenatal care. It results into lower birth weight of children. The antenatal cares during pregnancies involve variety of methods such as counseling of food, breastfeeding, medicines. Therefore, every pregnant woman is expected to get four antenatal visits to avoid the lower birth weight babies, morbidity and mortality.

As far as three antenatal cares are concerned then they are negatively co-related with primary and secondary education of pregnant women. The pregnant women do not find any problem for getting up to three antenatal visits. The women of Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist and Jain have negative relationship with three antenatal visits. These women do not get the three antenatal visits and the visits are negatively co-related and statistically significant. The women of scheduled caste, tribe, other back ward caste and none of the above religion are positively co-related with three antenatal care in NFHS-2. The lower birth weight is positively co-related to three antenatal visits. It is clear that below three antenatal care leads to lower birth weight among children in NFHS-2 data. Therefore, every pregnant woman must have the four antenatal visits. We have also studied the prenatal care to pregnant women and its access with NFHS-3 data (Table 10).

Variables Rural Urban
NO ANC visits Three ANC visits NO ANC visits Three ANC visits
Co-efficient Z test Co-efficient Z test Co-efficient Z test Co-efficient Z test
15-19 -0.28 (0.25) 1.31 0.76** (0.26) 8.39 -0.3388 3.08 0.28 (0.41) 0.48
20-24 -0.60** (0.24) 6.28 0.50** (0.25) 3.85 -01.06** (0.42) 6.44 -0.00 (0.40) 0
25-29 -0.55 (0.24) 5.31 0.34 (0.25) 1.76 -1.21** (0.42) 8.49 -0.22 (0.40) 0.3
30-34 -0.39** (0.24) 2.72 0.36 (0.25) 1.95 -01.11** (0.41) 7.05 -0.30 (0.40) 0.55
35-39 -0.15 (0.25) 0.4 0.26 (0.26) 1.74 -0.91 (0.42) 4.6 -0.23 (0.40) 0.32
40-44 -0.20 (0.27) 0.6 0.66** (0.28) 5.47 -0.46 (0.45) 1.02 -0.08 (0.43) 0.03
Illiterate -0.52 (0.50) 1.07 -0.09 (0.43) 0.05 -0.35 (0.50) 0.18 -0.33 (0.79) 0.18
Primary -0.0695 735.4 -0.028 290.12 -0.148 494.93 -0.0465 294.54
Secondary -0.1044 693.35 -0.0352 346.23 -0.224 494.44 -0.063 454.57
Hindu -0.49** (0.15) 9.77 -0.11 (0.14) 0.66 -01.09** (0.28) 14.33 -0.41 (0.21) 3.96
Muslim -0.28** (0.16) 2.86 0.03 (0.15) 0.04 -0.61 (0.29) 4.33 -0.10 (0.21) 0.25
Christian 0.26*** (0.13) 2.62 0.03 (0.15) 0.04 -0.56*** (0.13) 3.61 -0.16 (0.21) 0.59
Sikh -0.2684 29.19 -0.51** (0.18) 7.83 -3.066 7.74 -0.4318 13.41
Buddhist -0.15 (0.24) 0.4 -0.06 (0.21) 0.08 -01.57 (0.52) 8.96 -0.294 10.76
Jain -19.25 0.00) 1.04 0.23 (01.16) 0.04 -1.84 (1.05) 3.05 -1.52** (0.51) 8.9
No religion -0.60 (0.83) 0.52 -0.48 (0.89) 0.29 -17.66 (3964.58) 0 -0.45 (1.03) 0.19
Scheduled caste 1.25* (0.12) 108.15 0.73* (0.09) 63.62 1.36* (0.22) 38.43 1.16* (0.13) 76.23
Scheduled tribe 1.50* (0.12) 153.75 0.93* (0.09) 97.42 1.44* (0.12) 37.41 1.15* (0.14) 64.55
Other backward class 1.22 (0.11) 117.67 0.62* (0.08) 53.12 1.44 (0.23) 48.55 0.85* (0.12) 45.26
None of above 0.91 (0.11) 65.87 0.44* (0.08) 26.99 0.79 (0.21) 14.32 0.61* (0.12) 23.52
Lbw 1.09 (0.2) 1589.15 0.59* (0.01) 0.01 1.43 (0.3) 512.08 0.71* (0.02) 609.62
Intercept -1.8909 288.82 -03.46 (0.31) 124.48 -2.03709 105.3 -1.6121 52.01
-2log likelihood=5589.66 McFadden=0.14 -2log likelihood=4145.46 Chi2-=3895.45 McFadden=0.159
Nagelkerke=0.295 Chi2-=6738.67 Nagelkerke=0.289 Cox and Snell=0.235

Table 10: The antenatal visits and its determinants in NFHS-3 [@*significant at 1%, **significant at 5%, ***significant at 10%].

In NFHS-3, not received any antenatal check-ups are negatively corelated to age group of 20-24 and 30-34. The pregnant women’s primary, secondary education is negatively co-related to no antenatal check-ups. The religion of pregnant women such as Hindu, Muslim and Sikh is negatively co-related with no antenatal check-ups but it is positively co-related to pregnant women of Christian community. As far as pregnant women’s caste is concerned then scheduled caste, tribes have positive co-relation with no antenatal check-ups. It is statistically significant and positively co-related with no antenatal care.

As far as three antenatal visits are concerned then they are negatively co-related to 15-19, 20-24 and 40-44 age group. In this age group, pregnant women have not received antenatal care. They must get four antenatal cares to avoid the low birth weight babies. The three antenatal visits are negatively co-related to primary and secondary education. Basically all pregnant women should get the antenatal care irrespective of their education. The Prenatal care relates to any event or condition that occurs or exists in the embryo or the mother during the period between conception and delivery of the infant [14].

The study does not differentiate on the basis of education of women and nature of antenatal care. The pregnant women of Sikh community have negative co-relationship with three antenatal care. The women of scheduled tribes and scheduled caste, other backward caste and none of above caste have negative relationship with below three antenatal visits. The below three antenatal visits are also negatively co-related to low birth weight babies. In rural areas, the pregnant women must get the four antenatal care in order to avoid infant, child mortality, morbidity and malnutrition.

In the urban area, no antenatal check-ups are negatively co-related with pregnant women of Muslim religion. These women of Muslim religion visit health care facilities more frequently in urban areas. Therefore, the prenatal visits are negatively co-related and statistically significant. The pregnant women of Sikh community have three antenatal visits and it is statistically significant and positively corelated. They do not complete required four antenatal cares. The women of scheduled caste and scheduled tribe have up to three antenatal visits. They do not complete all four antenatal care. They are poor and do not have health care knowledge as well as access to health care in urban area. The health care facilities are overcrowded and each visit has high opportunity cost of time. That is why minimum antenatal visits are not completed. An illiterate, primary, secondary, higher secondary studied women have negative co-relationship with three antenatal care. The three antenatal visits are negatively co-related with the educational background of women. The three antenatal visits are negatively co-related with low birth weight of babies. The low birth weight babies in NFHS-3 do not have three antenatal visits during pregnancy of women. The low birth weight could occur below three antenatal cares. Therefore pregnant women should have four antenatal visits in order to eliminate low birth weight babies in India.

Policy Implication and Conclusion

There are number of studies linked to prenatal care and birth weight of babies. Adequate utilization of prenatal health care services positively associated with improved maternal and neonatal, infant and mortality, morbidity and other health outcomes. The full prenatal care is expected to have impact on the development of the fetus and infant as well as mothers health. This can only be achieved through early antenatal visits and regular attendance of antenatal clinic. The trend of maternal mortality in developing countries has been increasing and various international organizations have reported that an important factor related to maternal and infant mortality has been linked to lack of antenatal care [15]. This study is important as an impact factor of birth weight to low birth weight, mortality and morbidity. Therefore, the prenatal care is significant determinant of birth weight, mortality and morbidity in India. The high stunting, wasting and underweight among children are observed in urban and rural area. All the pregnant women in urban and rural areas must get four antenatal cares. The four antenatal cares are expected to reduce the prenatal complexities and improve the birth weight of babies through counseling medical checkups, medicines, balanced diet and breastfeeding awareness. But the women with low educational status are less likely to visit to health care facilities for the antenatal care. They do not have knowledge of minimum four antenatal visits and what tasks are performed in four visits. They do not visit hospitals and health care experts because they do not find pregnancy is a health problem.

The pregnant women of Hindu, Muslim, Sikh religion do not visit health care facilities for prenatal care. The women of scheduled caste and tribe are less likely to visit to health care facilities for antenatal care. The hospitals are located far away in rural areas. The opportunity cost of using health care facilities is very high. Due to high waiting cost, medicines and transport cost, the poor women do not visit frequently to health care facilities. Therefore the poor women skip the number of prenatal visits. It is found that the pregnant women of the poorer wealth quintiles often skip the number of antenatal visits than the pregnant women of richest wealth quintiles. The richer class women have more economic resources and they can visit to health care facilities. The poor women are daily wage earners or depend on family members for health care. In order to visit to health care facility, they required to take leave from work or ask the family members to accompany them. The direct cost of prenatal care is high for poor pregnant women. We have used multi-nominal logic model to examine the socio-economic and demographic factors with prenatal care. We found positive co-relationship with age, educational status, religion and caste of pregnant women. In order to reduce the incidence of malnutrition among children and mothers, government must establish more health centers in urban and rural area. Government must fill the vacancies of doctors on urgent basis which are lying since many years. Central and state governments must spend more money on health care facilities. Government must prepare the prenatal care related programs and must broadcast on the radio and television. It will provide more awareness about prenatal care among pregnant women in rural and urban area. In urban areas, more hospitals are required as per the density of population.

All the prenatal care related policies are required on urgent basis to tackle the lower coverage of prenatal care. We estimated that the full coverage of prenatal care will be possible after 2034 in rural area and 2040 in urban area. The health care staff must promote healthy practices during delivery period of each pregnant woman. Most of the pregnant women have fear of caesarean deliveries than normal deliveries. They avoid visiting health care facilities during such period. The present speed of antenatal care and it coverage is very low. There are number of socio-economic, demographic, psychosocial and behavioral factors are also responsible for the low coverage of antenatal care. All these factors are associated with reductions in mean birth weight and with increases in the odds of low birth weight. Smoking, drinking and using drugs during pregnancy all had very strong, adverse effects on outcomes, even after we controlled for other psychosocial, socio-economic and demographic factors [16].

For Indian sample, this study is not much useful because pregnant women do not take drugs and smoke. Poor perinatal outcomes impact individual families, society, and an overburdened health-care system. Because of technological advances in medicine, babies born too early are surviving. If longer gestation periods and higher birth weights could be achieved through improved models of prenatal care and education, a significant beneficial impact on birth outcomes could be achieved. With the growing trend toward evidence-based practice, nurses not only have a strong voice but also have a responsibility to change perceptions regarding the need to adopt research evidence into nursing practice. The patients receiving medical and/or nursing care in a group format is not a new concept. Group medical appointments have evolved in the management of patients with chronic diseases, such as diabetes, hypertension, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The group care format is one alternative to the traditional delivery of medical care [17]. The study shows that despite various efforts by the Government of India, utilization of antenatal care (ANC) services continue to be low among women from rural areas particularly those belonging to the Scheduled Tribes [18]. Therefore, central government must focus on tribal women for complete antenatal care. It will reduce the malnutrition, morbidity and mortality among children.

The study suggested that the utilization of maternal health services is a complex phenomenon and it is influenced by several factors [19]. Antenatal care may play an indirect role in reducing maternal mortality by encouraging women to deliver with assistance of a skilled birth attendant or in a health facility [20]. The study highlights the need for coordinated effort from government and stakeholders to improve women's education, as well as strengthen community participation. Furthermore, the study recommended the need to scale up the quality of ANC and family planning services backed by improved and equitable access, availability and quality of skilled delivery care services [21]. Awareness and perception creation towards skilled maternity service utilization need to be enhanced. Facilities and transport services should be more accessible as pointed out by this study [22]. To ensure safe motherhood initiative, government should pay special attention to reduce inequality in seeking skilled delivery assistance [23]. The study shows that women's autonomy was significantly associated with the maternal health care utilization by skilled attendants [24].

The study emphasized that the use of institutional delivery services was very low even among antenatal care attendees. Targeted programmatic efforts are necessary to increase skilled attendantassisted births, with the ultimate goal of reducing maternal mortality [25]. Addressing the underlying determinants for the inequities and bridging the quality gaps in maternal and new born services with due emphasis on respectful care for migrant women need tailored intervention and prioritization [26]. The long term sustainable policies for universal prenatal care are an urgent requirement to reduce mortalities, improve birth weights and reduce morbidities in India. Present study will certainly help to create awareness, understand present coverage, future challenges and policies for universal pre-natal care among pregnant women in India.

Important Notes

• Government of India along with International Institute for Population Science (IIPS) conducted National Family Health Survey (NFHS) three times in India. First NFHS was conducted in 1992-1993 period. The second NFHS survey was conducted in 1998-99. The third NFHS was conducted in 2005-06 in India. We have used same data for this analysis.

• We have considered four antenatal visits to health care facility by each pregnant woman as per World Health Organization (WHO) standards and guidelines.

References

  1. Adam W (2000) Socio-economic inequalities in child mortality: Comparisons across nine developing countries. Bulletin of the World Heal Organ 78: 19-29.
  2. Bibha S, Teijlingen ER, Porter M, Simkhada P (2008) Factors affecting the utilization of antenatal care in developing countries: Systematic review of the literature. J Advan Nurs 61: 244-260.
  3. Awiti JO (2014) A multilevel analysis of prenatal care and birth weight in Kenya. Health Econ Rev 4: 33.
  4. Ashraf G, Mirzaei F, Dokht FA (2011) Relationship between prenatal care and the outcome of pregnancy in low-risk pregnancies. Open J Obstet Gynecol 1: 109-112.
  5. Marilyn M (1996) Is antenatal care effective in reducing maternal morbidity and mortality? Health pol and plan 11: 1-15.
  6. Shayesteh H, Tehrani FR, Simbar M, Farzadfar F (2016) Factors influencing the use of prenatal care: A systematic review. J Midwife Reprod Heal 4: 544-557.
  7. Akanda AS (2010) Relationship between prenatal care and infant mortality: Evidence from Bangladesh demographic and health survey. South Asian J Popul Health 3: 191-202.
  8. Henderson JW (1994) The cost effectiveness of prenatal care. Health Care Financ Rev 15: 21-32.
  9. WHO (2016) WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. WHO Press, Geneva, Switzerland.
  10. Roy MP, Mohan U, Singh SK, Singh VK, Srivastava AK (2013) Determinants of utilization of antenatal care services in rural Lucknow, India. J Family Med Prim Care 2: 55-59.
  11. William J, Gilbert GE, Davis L, Sturgill V (2003) Delayed prenatal care and the risk of low birth weight delivery. J Comm Health 28: 199-208.
  12. Yeboah MK (2012) Social support and access to prenatal health services: A study of pregnant teenagers in Cape Coast, Ghana. J Sci and Tech 32: 68-78.
  13. Greene W (2003) Econometric Analysis (5th edn.) Pearson Education Private Ltd, Indian Branch, Delhi, India.
  14. Falah MA (2015) Females' satisfaction and perception about prenatal care services at primary health care centres. Int J Sci Res 5: 620-627.
  15. Olayinka A, Joel A, Bukola D (2012) Factors influencing utilization of antenatal care services among pregnant women in Ife Central Lga, Osun State Nigeria. Adv in Appli Sci Res 3: 1309-1315.
  16. Nancy ER, Teitler JO (2003) Effects of psychosocial risk factors and prenatal interventions on birth weight: Evidence from New Jersey’s health start program. Persp Sexual Reprod Health 35: 130-137.
  17. Thielen K (2012) Exploring the group prenatal care model: A critical review of the literature. J Perinat Educ 21: 209-218.
  18. Tulsi A, Sahu D, Nair S, Saha KB, Sharma RK (2016) Factors associated with utilization of antenatal care services among tribal women: A study of selected States. Indian J Med Res 144: 58-66.
  19. Jat TR, Ng N, Sebastian M (2011) Factors affecting the use of maternal health services in Madhya Pradesh state of India: A multilevel analysis. Int J Equity Health 5: 10-21.
  20. Regassa N (2011) Antenatal and postnatal care service utilization in southern Ethiopia: A population-based study. Afr Health Sci 11: 390-397.
  21. Fekadu M, Regassa N (2014) Skilled delivery care service utilization in Ethiopia: analysis of rural-urban differentials based on national demographic and health survey (DHS) data. Afr Health Sci 14: 974-984.
  22. Girmaye M, Berhan Y (2016) Skilled antenatal care service utilization and its association with the characteristics of women's health development team in Yeky District, South-West Ethiopia: A multilevel analysis. Ethiop J Health Sci 26: 369-380.
  23. Kamal SM, Hassan CH, Kabir MA (2015) Inequality of the use of skilled birth assistance among rural women in Bangladesh: facts and factors. Asia Pac J Public Health 27: 1321-1332.
  24. Kc S, Neupane S (2016) Women's autonomy and skilled attendance during pregnancy and delivery in Nepal. Matern Child Health J 20: 1222-1229.
  25. Cotter K, Hawken M, Temmerman M (2006) Low use of skilled attendants' delivery services in rural Kenya. J Health Popul Nutr 24: 467-471.
  26. Mirkuzie AH (2014) Exploring inequities in skilled care at birth among migrant population in a metropolitan city Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A qualitative study. Int J Equity Health 25: 110-115.
Citation: Rode SJ (2018) Effect of Complete Antenatal Care on Birth Weight of Children in India: Evidence from National Family Health Survey (NFHS) Data. J Women's Health Care 7:412.

Copyright: © 2018 Rode SJ. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top