Journal of Horticulture
Open Access

Effect of Hydrogels in Three Substrates on Growth and Ornamental Quality of Apple Mint (Mentha suaveolens) in Unirrigated Green Roofs

Hui XU¹, Kyung-Jin Yeum², Yong-han Yoon³ and Jin-Hee JU^{3* *}Correspondence: Jin-Hee JU, KonKuk University-Glocal Campus, College of Science, Department of Green Technology Convergence, 268, Chungwondaero, Chungju-Si, Chungcehongbuk-Do, 27487, South Korea, Tel: +82 43-840-3114, Email:

Author info »

Introduction

Green roofs, vegetative layers grown on rooftops, are an important environmental technology that is becoming popular in many cities around the world, because they have numerous environmental benefits and provide green, open-air spaces without requiring additional land. In recent years, accompanied by the rapid development of urbanization and the rise of urban agriculture, more attention has turned to the combination of green roofs and urban agriculture [1]. More and more edible plants are grown on green roofs, not only because of their ecological effects, but also because of the social benefits of supplying a safe and adequate food supply [2]. Mentha suaveolens (known as apple mint or woolly mint), a common wild plant, is native to Africa, temperate Asia, and Europe [3]. It is a popular and attractive tall-growing (to 1 m) plant used for culinary and ornamental purposes, with rounded, gray-green, hairy leaves, lavender flowers in midsummer, a slight apple scent, and a mildly fruity flavor [4,5]. Most mints prefer moist, sunny to partly sunny conditions [6]. However, the ecological environments on roofs and the ground are quite different. Extreme environmental conditions are often found on rooftops, including intense solar radiation, a high rate of heating, large temperature gap between day and night, strong winds, shallow substrate depths and drought. These factors present great challenges in sustaining plant material on green roofs, especially during a drought. Hydrogels can retain water several hundred times greater than their weight and thus are widely used to improve the moisture content of soil in the fields of agriculture, horticulture and forestry [7-9]. The effects of hydrogel on plant growth are evidenced by prolonged survival time, increased plant height, wider leaves, greater leaf area, greater biomass, greater vegetable yield, increased succulence and a higher concentration of chloroplasts [10-13]. However, such reduction might result if hydrogels lose effectiveness with time [14]. According to Al-Harbi et al. the maximum water holding capacity of hydrogel decreased by 17.3% and 27.8% in soil fortified with hydrophilic polymer at a rate of 0.1% and 0.4%, respectively, in two years [15]. Jobin et al. observed no difference in available water or porosity in three substrates containing hydrogel after nine weeks [16]. Bai et al. studied soil moisture of sandy soils mixed with four types of super-absorbent polymer under alternating dry and weight conditions [17]. They found that the water-retention capacity of the polymer decreased sharply when soil moisture was lower than a critical threshold. In addition, the water-holding capacity of hydrogel could be affected by the extreme environmental conditions on a rooftop, such as intense solar radiation, high temperatures, water deficit, freeze-thaw cycles caused by seasonal changes and wetting-drying cycles caused by weather changes [18-20]. Those result indicated that the effect of hydrogel depended on substrate type and plant species. Therefore, we proposed to find out if addition of appropriate amounts of hydrogel to Mentha suaveolens growth substrates can increase its growth and ornamental quality of on green roofs.

Materials and Methods

Experimental design and substrate

This experiment had a factorial design with three different substrates and five hydrogel treatment rates (0, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 kgm^-3). There were three replicates for each treatment. A total of 45 square containers (50 cm L × 50 cm W × 25 cm H) were installed on a roof platform at the Complex Practice Building of Konkuk University, Chungju, Chungcheongbuk-do, located at latitude 35°49' N and longitude 127°08' E. From top to bottom, each container was filled with the following four layers: vegetation, growth medium, geotextile filter, and plastic drainage. Experimental substrates were formulated with 80%, 20%, or 50% (by volume) coconut coir dust and 20%, 80%, or 50% (by volume) per liter, respectively. Hydrogel (K-SAM, Kolon Chemical Co., Ltd., Korea) was incorporated into substrates at concentrations of 0 (control), 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 kgm- 3 (polymer: medium w/v; dry weight basis) with three replicates per treatment. The depth of all substrates was 20 cm. The monthly precipitation was 88.2, 110.6, 277.7, 122.7 and 153.8 mm in June, July, August, September and October, respectively.

Plant material

Seedlings of Mentha suaveolens were grown in 10-cm diameter pots obtained from a commercial nursery. This species was selected based on their growth habits, high sensitivity to moisture stress and need for regular irrigation, and also because they are commonly used in mint tea, fruit drinks, salads [21]. Three seedlings of Mentha suaveolens with heights of about 8 cm were transplanted into green roof containers on May 14^th, 2014. The initial height of transplants differed by <1 cm. All plants were watered every two days for the first week and no longer watered when they were well established.

Measurement of plant growth and ornamental quality

Plant height (H) above the stem base, width at the widest vegetative point of the plant passing through the center (W1) and widest width perpendicular to W1 (W2) were measured in June during the peak growth period and the drought period. The data on height and width were used to calculate the growth index (GI), ([W1 + W2]/2 +H)/2, which is commonly used as an indicator of plant size [22]. The length and width of leaves, number of leaves and relative appearance of the plants were also assessed in June. The relative appearance of the plants was evaluated based on visually. The visual rating evaluations were divided into five grades; grade 1, severely stressed and completely dried out; grade 2, stressed, with less than 50% of the leaves retaining green pigmentation; grade 3, mildly stressed, with 50% of the leaves retaining green pigmentation; grade 4, minor stress, with over 50% of the leaves appearing to be healthy; and grade 5, unstressed, with all leaves appearing healthy [23]. Number of inflorescences, leaf color and chlorophyll content of the leaves were measured in August, when plants were at their peak flowering time and the rainy season. Leaf color was measured using a Chroma meter (CR-400, Konica Minolta Group, Japan) with L*, a*, and b* mode. The L* values ranged from black (L*=0) to white (L*=100). The a* values ranged from red (a*=100) to green (a*=−100). The b* values ranged from yellow (b*=100) to blue (b*=−100). Chroma C* was calculated as (a^*2 + b^*2)^1/2 as a measure of color saturation or intensity. The hue angle, h, was calculated as tan^-1 (b*/a*). When a* was less than 0 and b* was greater than 0, h was 180 + tan^-1 (b*/a*). The value of h falls on a 360° color wheel, with 0°, 90°, 180°, and 270° representing red -purple, yellow, bluish-green and blue respectively. The third leaf from the top of each plant was measured. The chlorophyll content of the leaves was measured in nine leaves per container using a SPAD-502 meter (Minolta Camera Co., Ltd, Osaka, Japan).

Statistical Analysis

Data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the SAS 9.1 software package (SAS version 9.1, SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Significant mean separation was indicated by Duncan’s multiple range tests. Statistical significance was defined as p≤0.05.

Result and Discussion

The plant growth of Mentha suaveolens was significantly different in the three substrates (Table 1). There was an interactive effect between substrate and hydrogel rate on leaf number (interaction p<0.001) and visual rating (interaction p<0.001). The plant height (p<0.001), leaf length (p<0.001), leaf width (p<0.001), growth index (p< 0.001) and visual rating (p<0.001) of Mentha suaveolens were the worst in substrate C₁P₄ when they were measured in June with less rainfall. However, the lowest leaf number (p<0.001) was found in substrate C₁P₁. In substrate C₁P₄, all of the plant growth measures were highest with a concentration of 2.0 kg-m^-3 of hydrogel. In substrate C₁P₁, the plant height and visual rating at the concentration of 2.0 kg-m^-3 of hydrogel in substrate C₁P₁ was the highest. There was an interactive effect between substrate and hydrogel concentration on the total number of inflorescences of Mentha suaveolens, with a significantly greater number of inflorescences in substrate C₁P₄ than in the other substrates (Figure 1). The total number of inflorescences per plant in substrate C₁P₄ treated with 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 kg-m^-3 hydrogel was increased significantly, especially at the rate of 1.0 kgm^-3, compared to the other hydrogel treatments or control in all substrates. In substrate C₁P₄, the number of inflorescences was 1.27-, 1.24- and 1.39- fold more than those in the control. As shown in Table 2, there was an interactive effect between substrate and hydrogel concentration on a* (interaction p=0.004), b* (interaction p<0.001), chroma (C*) (interaction p<0.001) and SPAD value (interaction p< 0.001) of Mentha suaveolens, with the lowest a* value but the highest values of z and chroma (C*) in C₄P₁. There were also significant differences between the three substrates in the values of lightness (L*) (p=0.002). However, there was no significant difference in hue angle (h). The addition of 2.0 kg-m^-3 hydrogel increased the value of a* (more green) in C₄P₁. However, addition of hydrogel decreased the value of a* (less green) in C₁P₄. The values of b* and chroma (C*) were higher under the 2.0 kg-m^-3 treatment than under other treatments or control in C₁P₄. In substrate C₁P₁, the values of b* and C* were decreased at a concentration of 1.0 and 2.0 kg-m^-3 hydrogel. The effect of the hydrogel on plant growth of Mentha suaveolens was most obvious in substrate C₁P₄, which was associated with higher hydrogel content under drought stress, especially at a rate of 2.0 kgm^-3. Moreover, the highest growth of Mentha suaveolens was observed with the 1.0 kg-m^-3 and 2.0 kg-m- 3 treatments, perhaps because the capacity for water retention of the soil and the efficiency of water use increased with the addition of hydrogel under drought conditions [24-26]. This finding is also consistent with those of other studies which showed the effect of hydrogel on plant growth and hydrogel used to improve the transplant success of seedlings [12,13,27-30]. Akhter et al. reported that the addition of hydrogel could slow soil moisture loss and delay the wilting time of seedlings by four to five days [31]. The C₄P₁ and C₁P₁ substrates contained more coir components that could hold more water to maintain the structural integrity of plants and supply nutrients under drought conditions [32,33]. Cho et al. have found that gerbera has greater growth in coir-based substrates with more organic matter content than in rockwool, especially in root growth [34]. Xia et al. have studied the effects of relative moisture content of organic substrates on the growth of tomatoes and have shown that the physiological characteristics and fruit yield of tomatoes were improved significantly with increasing moisture content [35]. It has also been suggested that a substrate with high coir content can increase plant growth of Mentha suaveolens under drought conditions. However, the total number of inflorescences per plant of the Mentha suaveolens grown in C₁P₄ was significantly greater than that of plants grown in C₄P₁ and C₁P₁ under rainy conditions. Moreover, C₄P₁ with high coir content resulted in brighter, more yellow and more yellow-green leaves than did the other two substrates. The data on SPAD value in this study agreed with that of the color measurement. The light purple flowers of Mentha suaveolens start blooming in early July and continue through late September and the peak blooming period occurs from late July to the middle of the August. The period of peak flower blooming corresponded to the rainy season, when there is heavy rainfall. Leaf greenness can be affected by many factors, such as growth stage and water stress to the middle of August [36,37]. In our study, there was heavy rainfall during the peak flowering time, which may result in waterlogging and there by affect inflorescence number and leaf color. Rowe et al. reported that high levels of organic substrate may result in shrinkage because of decomposition. Increased coir could result in lush growth that may suffer damage under frequent rainfall, resulting in frequent wetting cycles. In our study, the higher coir content of substrate C₄P₁ increased the content of water available for plant growth in June, when there was little rainfall, resulting in greater growth and visual rating than for substrate C₁P₄. However, the intensity of rainfall in August reduced plant growth and ornamental quality. These results confirmed that the growth of Mentha suaveolens was significantly affected by the composition of substrate in the dry season [38]. On this, the growth of Mentha suaveolens was the best in C₄P₁ and the worst in C₁P₄ in June under drought conditions. However, data on the total number of inflorescences and the ornamental quality of Mentha suaveolens plant suggests that the 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 kg-m^-3 treatments of C₁P₄ and control, and the 2.0 kg-m^-3 treatment of C₁P₁, were more beneficial than were other treatments and more inflorescence and better ornamental quality in C₁P₄ and C₁P₁ than in C₄P₁ in August during the rainy season. This result might indicate that reducing water loss by adding the coconut coir dust seems to improve the growth of Mentha suaveolens plant under drought condition, but produces less flowering and ornamental quality under rainy condition. These experimental conditions suggest that effective strategies to improve growth and promote flowering yield might partially be amended in substrate C₁P₄ with 1.0 kg-m^-3 hydrogel for the rainy season or the dry season in green roofs.

Table 1: Plant height, leaf number, leaf length, leaf width growth index and visual rating of Mentha suaveolens (apple mint) grown in three different green roof substrates supplemented with five concentrations of hydrogel in June (dry season).

Table 2: Ornamental quality and chlorophyll contents of Mentha suaveolens (Apple mint) leaf grown in three different green roof substrates supplemented with five concentrations of hydrogel in August (rainy season).

Figure 1: Effect on the total number of inflorescences per plant of Mentha suaveolens (Apple mint) in the three different green roof-substrates (C4P1: Coir 80%, perlite 20%; C1P1: Coir 50%, Perlite 50%; C1P4: Coir 20%, perlite 80% (% by Vol)) supplemented with five concentrations of hydrogel, 0 (Control), 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 kg·m^-3 (hydrogel: medium w/v; dry weight basis). Bars followed by the same letter are not significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 level by Duncan’s multiple range tests. Data represent means ± SE (n=9).

Conclusion

Mentha suaveolens grew better in C₄P₁ or C₁P₁ than in C₁P₄ in June under drought conditions. However, C₄P₁ with high coir content decreased the inflorescence number and ornamental quality during peak flowering time; the heavier rainfall may result in waterlogging. In contrast, the effect of hydrogel on the number of inflorescences and on the ornamental quality of Mentha suaveolens was most obvious in substrate C₁P₄, which was associated with higher hydrogel content under rainy conditions. Therefore, we suggest that substrate C₁P₄ with 1.0 kg-m^-3 hydrogel was optimal for Mentha suaveolens grown on green roofs, because the plants showed stable growth in these conditions, regardless of growth concerns in times of drought and ornamental quality concerns in the rainy season.

References

1. Whittinghill LJ, Rowe DB. The role of green roof technology in urban agriculture. Renew Agr Food Syst. 2012;27(4):314-322.
2. Hui SCM. Green roof urban farming for buildings in high-density urban cities. In: The 2011 Hainan China World Green Roof Conference, Hainan (Haikou, Boao and Sanya), China, 18-21 March 2011.
3. Kumar P, Mishra S, Malik A, Satya S. Insecticidal properties of Mentha species: A review. Ind Crop Prod. 2011;34(1):802-817.
4. Kowalchick P, Hylton S, Kowalchick C, Hylton WH.  Rodales Illustrated Encyclopedia of Herbs. Rodale Press, Emmaus, Pennsylvania, USA, 1998.
5. Stace C. New Flora of the British Isles. Cambridge University Press, UK. 2010.
6. Austin ME, Bondari K. Hydrogel as a field medium amendment for blueberry plants. Hort Sci. 1992;27(9):973-974.
7. Fonteno WC, Bilderback TE. Impact of hydrogel on physical properties of coarse-structured horticultural substrates. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 1993;118(2):217-222.
8. Farrell C, Ang XQ, Rayner JP. Water-retention additives increase plant available water in green roof substrates. Ecological Engineering. 2013;52:112-118.
9. El-Rehim HA, Hegazy ESA, El-Mohdy HL. Radiation synthesis of hydrogels to enhance sandy soils water retention and increase plant performance. J Appl Polym Sci. 2004;93(3):1360-1371.
10. Lawrence JBO, Hillary A, Gerald E, John DK, Martin W, Aloys H, et al. Effects of hydrogels on tree seedling performance in temperate soils before and after water stress. J Environ Prot Sci. 2013;4(7):713-721.
11. Hüttermann A, Orikiriza LJ, Agaba H. Application of superabsorbent polymers for improving the ecological chemistry of degraded or polluted lands. Clean-Soil, Air, Water. 2009;37(7):517-526.
12. Agaba H, Baguma Orikiriza LJ, Esegu O, Francis J, Obua J, et al. Effects of hydrogel amendment to different soils on plant available water and survival of trees under drought conditions. Clean-Soil, Air, Water. 2010;38(4):328-335.
13. Geesing D, Schmidhalter U. Influence of sodium polyacrylate on the water-holding capacity of three different soils and effects on growth of wheat. Soil Use and Management. 2004;20(2):207-209.
14. Al-Harbi AR, Al-Omran AM, Shalaby AA, Choudhary MI. Efficacy of a hydrophilic polymer declines with time in greenhouse experiments. Hort Sci. 1999;34(2):223-224.
15. Jobin P, Caron J, Bernier PY, Dansereau B. Impact of two hydrophilic acrylic-based polymers on the physical properties of three substrates and the growth of Petunia× hybrid ‘Brilliant Pink’. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2004;129(3):449-457.
16. Bai W, Zhang H, Liu B, Wu Y, Song J. Effects of super-absorbent polymers on the physical and chemical properties of soil following different wetting and drying cycles. Soil Use and Management. 2010;26(3):253-260.
17. Holliman PJ, Clark JA, Williamson JC, Jones DL. Model and field studies of the degradation of cross-linked polyacrylamide gels used during the revegetation of slate waste. Sci Total Environ. 2005;336(1-3):13-24.
18. Wang YT, Gregg LL. Hydrophilic polymers-Their response to soil amendments and effect on properties of a soilless potting mix. Journal of the American Society for Hort Sci. 1990;115(6):943-948.
19. Andry H, Yamamoto T, Irene T, Moritani S, Inoue M, Fujiyama H, et al. Water retention,hydraulic conductivity of hydrophilic polymers in sandy soil as affected by temperature and water quality. J Hydrol. 2009;373(1-2):177-183.
20. Boning CR. Florida's best herbs and spices: Native and exotic plants grown for scent and flavor. Pineapple Press Inc. 2010;7:6-10.
21. Hammond HE, Norcini JG, Wilson SB, Schoellhorn RK, Miller DL. Growth, flowering and survival of fire wheel Gaillardia pulchella Foug. based on seed source and growing location. Native Plants J. 2007;8(1):25-39.
22. Nagase A, Dunnett N. Drought tolerance in different vegetation types for extensive green roofs: effects of watering and diversity. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2010;97(4):318-327.
23. McGuire RG. Reporting of objective color measurements. Horticultural Sci. 1992;27:(12)1254-1255.
24. Wang SY, Camp MJ. Temperatures after bloom affect plant growth and fruit quality of strawberry. Scientia Horticulturae. 2000;85(3):183-199.
25. Wang YT, Boogher CA. Effect of a medium-incorporated hydrogel on plant growth and water use of two foliage species. J Environmen Horticul. 1987;5(3):125-127.
26. Dorraji SS, Golchin A, Ahmadi S. The effects of hydrophilic polymer and soil salinity on corn growth in sandy and loamy soils. CLEAN-Soil, Air, Water. 2010;38(7):584-591.
27. Shim MS, Choi SY, Kwon OK. Growth responses of Ardisia pusilla to the contents of various hydrophilic polymers in the media. Horticul, Environ and Biotech. 2008;49(4):365-370.
28. Thomas DS. Hydrogel applied to the root plug of subtropical eucalypt seedlings halves transplant death following planting. Forest Ecology Management. 2008;255(4):1305-1314.
29. Hüttermann A, Zommorodi M, Reise K. Addition of hydrogels to soil for prolonging the survival of Pinus halepensis seedlings subjected to drought. Soil and Tillage Research. 1999;50(5):295-304.
30. Akhter J, Mahmood K, Malik KA, Mardan A, Ahmad M, Iqbal MM, et al. Effects of hydrogel amendment on water storage of sandy loam and loam soils and seedling growth of barley, wheat and chickpea. Plant, Soil and Environment. 2004;50(10):463-469.
31. Bilderback TE, Warren SL, Owen JS, Albano JP. Healthy substrates need physicals too! Hort Technology. 2004;15:747-751.
32. Handreck KA, Black ND. Growing media for ornamental plants and turf. UNSW Press, Australia.
33. Cho MS, Park YY, Jun HJ, Chung JB. Growth of Gerbera in mixtures of coir dust and perlite. Horticult, Environ and Biotech. 2006;47:211-216.
34. Xia XB, Yu XC, Gao JJ. Effects of moisture content in organic substrate on the physiological characters, fruit quality and yield of tomato plant. Chinese J Apllied Ecology. 2007;18:2710-2714.
35. Solari F, Shanahan J, Ferguson R, Schepers J, Gitelson A. Active sensor reflectance measurements of corn nitrogen status and yield potential. Agronomy J. 2008;100(3):571-579.
36. Fanizza G, Ricciardi L, Bagnulo C. Leaf greenness measurements to evaluate water stressed genotypes in Vitis vinifera. Euphytica. 1991;55(1):27-31.
37. Rowe DB, Monterusso MA, Rugh CL. Assessment of heat-expanded slate and fertility requirements in green roof substrates. Hort Technology. 2006;16(1):471-477.