Medicinal & Aromatic Plants

Medicinal & Aromatic Plants
Open Access

ISSN: 2167-0412

+44 1300 500008

Research Article - (2013) Volume 2, Issue 1

Effect of Momordica Charantia on the Cytotoxic and Virulence Responses of Campylobacter Jejuni Isolated from Poultry Fecal Samples

Khatiwada J1, Kallur V2, Mentreddy S2, Davis S1, Washington D1, Smith D1 and Williams L1*
1North Carolina A&T State University, Center for Excellence in Post-Harvest Technologies, North Carolina Research Campus, USA
2Alabama A&M University, Huntsville, AL 35810, USA
*Corresponding Author: Williams L, 500 Laureate Way, Suite 4222, Kannapolis, NC 28081, USA, Tel: +1-17042505703, Fax: +1-17042505709 Email:

Abstract

Consumption of untreated drinking water, raw milk, undercooked poultry meat and handling of raw poultry meat are the main sources of campylobacteriosis. Treatment of campylobacteriosis becomes very difficult due to the increasing pattern of antimicrobial resistance of these microbes. Thus, objectives of this study were to determine the cytotoxic potential of Campylobacter jejuni (C. jejuni) isolated from fecal samples of poultry on Chinese Hamster Ovary cell (CHO) and also to determine the effect of Bitter Melon (Momordica charantia) extract (BME) at 25%, 5%, 2.5% and 0.5% concentrations to reduce the cytotoxic effect of C. jejuni on CHO cells. Thirty-two C. jejuni strains isolated from poultry fecal samples were analyzed using Bolton broth as pre-enrichment broth and modified Charcoal–Cefoperazone Deoxycholate agar as a selective media, then characterized for the presence of 16S rRNA gene using polymerase chain reaction. Of the thirty-two strains isolated, twelve (37.5%) were positive for the presence of 16S rRNA gene. Minimum percent (0.17%) of cell adhesion of C. jejuni strain ATCC 29428 on CHO cells was observed at 25% BME and highest percent (8.3%) of cell adhesion was observed at 0.5% BME C. jejuni strain FCA 40 released minimum percent (44%) of Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) from CHO cells in the presence of 25% concentration of BME, where as maximum percent (73%) of LDH release was observed with 0.5% concentration of BME on CHO cells. Results of this experiment also showed that percent alkaline phosphate (AP) release is ranged from 100% (ATCC 29428 with 0.5% BME) to 67% (ATCC 29428 with 25% BME). Thus, results of this study showed that BME significantly reduced the cytotoxic effects of C. jejuni on CHO cells, and it can be utilize as a natural therapeutic agent.

Keywords: Foodborne; Campylobacter; jejuni; Chinese hamster ovary cell; Bitter melon extract; Cytotoxic effect Foodborne

Introduction

Campylobacteriosis is one of the most common diarrheal illness in the United States caused by Campylobacter spp. Campylobacteriosis is estimated to affect over 2.4 million persons or 0.8% of the population and causes 124 deaths each year in the US [1]. CDC reported that approximately one in every 1,000 reported Campylobacter illnesses leads to Guillain-Barré syndrome and as many as 40% of Guillain- Barré syndrome cases may be triggered by campylobacteriosis in the US (CDC, 2010). This infection may be sporadic in occurrence or can occur as an outbreak usually in autumn and spring [2]. Sporadic infection occurs due to consumption of untreated drinking water [3], raw milk [3,4], milk from bottles pecked by birds [5], undercooked poultry [3,6-9], and handling of raw poultry meat [3,10]. C. jejuni causes more than 90% of campylobacteriosis cases in most developed countries [11]. The species most commonly associated with human infection is Campylobacter jejuni (80–90%), followed by Campylobacter coli (5–10%), but other Campylobacter species are also known to cause human infection [12,13]. It has been reported that overlapping of serotypes of C. jejuni was observed in humans, poultry and cattle, which indicated that food of animal origin have a significant contribution in transmitting Campylobacter jejuni to human being [14].

Campylobacter species has resistance to several antibiotics, which leads to increasing infection and prolonged illness in humans. This resistance to several antibiotics makes it difficult to treat the infection. The use of fluoroquinolones in poultry was approved in Europe, but there was a rapid increase in the C. jejuni strains in humans in early 1990s [15,16], which showed that the fluoroquinolones susceptible strains also became resistant when it was administered in chicks [17]. The strains, which were isolated from dysenteric samples, were found to be more invasive and cytotoxic than the strains which were grown by in vitro method [18]. The important step in the pathogenesis of Campylobacteriosis is reported to be the adhesion to and invasion of the surface of the mucosal surfaces [19]. C. jejuni does not exhibit invasive property when tested with Sereny-Anton test. However, its invasive property is proved by its presence in blood and leucocytes of infected patients and also through many experiments performed in vivo [20].

C. jejuni is believed to account for approximately 90% of all cases of human Campylobacter infections, with C. coli, which is usually associated with pigs, accounting for 3-4% of cases [21]. Case-control study in the United States has shown that 48% to 70% of sporadic infections were due to consumption of chicken infected with C. jejuni [22]. However, consumption of contaminated chicken may not only be the reason for Campylobacteriosis in human. Feces of beef cattle are also known to be a rich source of C. jejuni. The infection can also occur due to drinking of contaminated water with C. jejuni [23]. The disease occurs due to the consumption of enterotoxins produced in the contaminated food by C. jejuni. Within 2-3 days of consumption of contaminated food, symptoms such as fever, abdominal pain and diarrhea are observed followed by the gastroenteritis, septicemia, proctitis, arthritis, meningitis, abortion and Guillain-Barre’ syndrome [23]. Treatment for Campylobacteriosis becomes difficult because of the antimicrobial resistance of these microbes. Antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter is an emerging threat to public health. In a study, 38.8% of 297 C. jejuni samples were resistant to antibiotics like ampicillin, streptomycin, and erythromycin samples [8]. In the same study resistance to tetracycline, a character transferred through plasmid was the most common antibiotic resistance observed in around 23.8% of all the C. jejuni. In another study, 59% of C. jejuni were found to be resistant to ciprofloxacin, 23% to tetracycline and 17% to ampicillin from 69 samples collected from humans suffering with diarrhea [24].

Differentiation between various species of C. jejuni is very important, especially between C. jejuni and C. coli. The main reason is that these species are the most frequently isolated from the diarrhea. These two species share common clinical manifestation, which makes it further more difficult to differentiate. Microbiological, biochemical and serological detection and identification are time consuming and cumbersome procedures. Thus, an easier and efficient way of differentiating microbes with close similarities is by performing molecular identification.

Adherence and invasion of Campylobacter species into a host cell does not mean that host cell is infected. After the adherence and invasion of C. jejuni, the host cell defense will try and kill the microbe. A host cell is said to be infected either by observing derailment in metabolic changes or by the cell damage or cell death. Cell death or damage is indicated by the release of various enzymes such as lactate dehydrogenase and alkaline phosphatase. Thus, in this study cell association, adhesion and cell cytotoxicity assays were performed by estimating the lactate dehydrogenase and alkaline phosphatase release from Chinese hamster ovary cells. Cytotoxic effects of various Campylobacter jejuni strains isolated from cells fecal samples of poultry in the presence of 25, 5, 2.5 and 0.5% ethanol extract Bitter Melon.

Materials and Methods

The C. jejuni samples were collected from various poultry farms using sterile tongue depressors. Approximately 2-3 g of fecal samples was collected into tubes containing Clair-Blair semi-solid medium. This medium were supplemented with 5% lysed horse blood and shipped in refrigerator maintained at 8-10ºC to the Food Microbiology Laboratory at Alabama A&M University.

Isolation and Growth of Campylobacter jejuni

Within an hour of sample collection, plating was performed for identification of C. jejuni. Plating was performed using modified Campy- Cefex [25] and modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar [26]. The samples were grown in Preston Broth enrichment media (Oxoid, Ltd.), and then were incubated for 24 h at 42ºC under microaerophillic conditions. Microaerophillic condition was provided in Anaxomat (Spiral Biotech, Norwood, MA) jar glassing System. These conditions include 10% CO2, 5% O2, and 85% N2 air gas mixture. Then 0.1 ml of this enriched sample were swabbed onto mCC (modified campy cefex) and mCCDA (modified charcoal cefeperozone deoxycholate agar) plates. These plates were incubated for 24 h at 42ºC under microaerophillic conditions. Plates were then screened for typical Campylobacter colonies. Colonies that showed typical morphology and motility under phase contrast microscopy were considered presumptive positive. Tryptic soy broth (Difco, Detroit, MI) supplemented with 30% glycerol (v/v) and 5% lysed horse blood were used to store the presumptive positive samples at -80ºC for further use.

In this study, C. jejuni strains were isolated using modified protocol. Brain heart infusion broth (BHI) supplemented with crude 0.5, 2.5, 5.0, and 25% Bitter Melon extract were used for culturing all C. jejuni strains. The ethanol extract of Bitter Melon used in this experiment was provided by Dr. S. Rao Mentreddy, Medicinal Plant Laboratory of Alabama A&M University. Different concentrations of Bitter Melon extract were prepared using sterile distilled water. BHI broth (5 mL) in a 13×100 mm culture tube was inoculated with approximately 10 μl of culture taken from a frozen glycerol stock. Each tube containing the starter culture was incubated at 37ºC for 24-48 h without agitation under modified microaerophillic conditions (85% Nitrogen, 10% carbon dioxide and 5% oxygen).

Polymerase Chain Reaction Identification of Campylobacter Isolates

DNA from the samples was extracted. The samples were initially grown for about 24-48 h at 42ºC under microaerophillic conditions. DNA extractions were performed using PrepMan™ Ultra (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). PCR assay were carried out using extracted DNA samples for 16s ribosomal RNA. 16s ribosomal RNA gene is highly conserved within a species and among species of the same genus, and hence can be used as the new gold standard for speciation of C. jejuni. [27].

DNA amplification for 16s ribosomal RNA

DNA amplification for 16S r RNA was performed on a total of 50μl. The reaction mix consisted of 30.9 μl of deionized water, 5 μl of 10X PCR buffer II (50mM KCl, 10mM Tris-HCL, pH 8.3), 4 μl of 25 mM MgCl2, 4 μl of each of 200 μM deoxynucleotide triphosphates dATP, dCTP, dGTP and dTTP, 0.3 μl of each forward and reverse primer (Table 1), 0.5 μl of Taq DNA polymerase (Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, Conn.) and 5 μl of 20 ng template DNA. Amplification was carried out with in 30 cycles. Denaturation was carried out at 94ºC for one minute, annealing for one minute at 60ºC, and an extension for 1 minute at 72ºC. After the last cycle, an extra extension temperature of 72ºC for 5 minutes was carried out and the samples were held at 4ºC until it is used. The PCR product was detected by electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel and then visualized under UV light after staining with ethidium bromide.

Primer Name Sequence (5'-3') Gene Base pair
C412 F GATGACACTTTTCGGAG 16SrRNA 816
C1228 R CATTGTAGCACGTGTGTC 16SrRNA 816

Table 1: Gene sequence of Primer used for 16S r RNA for performing Polymerase Chain Reaction.

Cytotoxicity Assay

Cell Association/Adhesion Assay

The cell association assay was performed as described by Francis et al. [28]. CHO cells were seeded in 24-well tissue culture plates with 0.5 ml of Dulbecco,s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum containing 105 cells per ml and incubated overnight at 37ºC with 7% CO2. Prior to cell association assay, the medium covering the cells was replaced with fresh pre-warmed DMEM-10 and incubated for a minimum of 30 min at 37ºC in 7% CO2. The cells were inoculated with the same numbers of bacteria for different Bitter Melon concentrations. One hundred micro liters of each culture was added to each well at a multicity of infection (MOI) of 100:1. The initial concentrations per well ranged from 3.1×107 to 5.8×107 cells per milliliter. The plates were incubated for 2 hour at 37ºC with 7% CO2. After incubation, monolayers were washed three (3x) times with sterile phosphate buffered saline (pH 6.8) to remove any non-associated bacteria. The cells were lysed by incubation at 25ºC with 1% Triton-X for 10 minute. BHI broth (0.8 ml) was added to each well and serial dilutions were performed to determine cell concentration per monolayer. This represented the number of bacteria cell-associated and intracellular. Cell associated bacteria were plated onto plate count agar (PCA) to determine the number of associated cells. Cell association percentages were calculated as follows:

(Number of cell associated bacteria / the number of bacteria originally added)×100.

Cell Invasion Assay

The cell invasion assay was carried out as described by Durant et al. [29]. Bacteria were allowed to adhere to CHO cells as described in the cell association assay. After incubation for 2 hour, the overlying medium was removed and replaced with pre-warmed DMEM-10 containing 100 μg of gentamicin per ml. The cell monolayer was washed 3 times with sterile PBS (pH 6.8). The cells were then lysed by incubation at 25ºC with 0.2 ml of 1% Triton-X for 10 min. Brain heart infusion (BHI) broth was added to each well and serial dilutions were performed to determine the cell concentration (cells/ml) per monolayer. This represented the number of bacteria that were internalized since gentamicin killed extracellular bacteria while intracellular bacteria were viable MacBeth and Lee [30]. Intracellular bacteria were enumerated by plating for viable bacteria onto plate count agar. The percent of invasion were determined as follows:

% Invasion = Mean number of internalized bacteria/Mean number of bacteria originally added × 100

Lactate Dehydrogenase Assay

After the development of a monolayer, CHO obtained in 24 well plates were washed two times with serum free Dulbecco’s modified Eagles medium (DOF) and exposed to C. jejuni bacteria at MOI of 100:1 for 16 hour. The experiment was carried out in replicates of 2 wells per treatment. After incubation, cells were centrifuged (300×g, 3 min) using a Beckman bench top centrifuge and cell free supernatant fluid (0.1 ml) was collected and LDH assay was conducted using a cytotoxicity kit (Boehringer Mannheim, Anaheim, CA) according to Manufacturer instructions. After 3 minutes of incubation at room temperature, the plates were read at 490/655 nm using a BioTek Synergy™ (Winooski, VT) micro plate reader. The cytotoxicity percentage was calculated by following formula:

Cytotoxicity (%) = Experimental Value – Low Control/High Control-Low Control×100.

Alkaline Phosphatase Activity

After the development of a monolayer, CHO obtained in 24 well plates were washed two times with serum free Dulbecco’s modified Eagles medium (D0F) and exposed to C. jejuni bacteria for 16 hour. After incubation, cells were centrifuged (300×g, 3 min) and cell supernatant (0.1 ml) was placed in a 96-wells microtitre plate for AP assay. Alkaline phosphatase substrate buffer (100 μl, 0.1 M Tris, 0.1 mol l-1 NaCl, 5 mmol l-1 MgCl2, pH 9.5) containing p-nitrophenyl phosphate (PNPP, 1 mg/ml) (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO) was added to each well. After 3 minutes of incubation at room temperature, the plates were read at A405/595 nm using a BioTek Synergy™ plate reader (Winooski, VT). The AP percentage was calculated by the following formula.

AP % = Experimental Value – Low Control/High Control-Low Control×10.

Statistical Analysis

Complete Random Block Design was used for cell association, cell invasion, lactate dehydrogenase and alkaline phosphatase assay. Data were analyzed using SAS software. Mean differences were tested for statistical significance by ANOVA and means were separated using Tukey’s studentized range test. Means differences were considered significant at P ≤ 0.05.

Results and Discussions

Bacterial Strains

The ability of the C. jejuni to utilize catalase, oxidase and production of sodium hippurate were determined. The results of this test showed that twelve out of thirty-two isolates were positive for C. jejuni (Figure 1) and these isolates were considered presumptive positive and were further characterized genotypically using PCR.

medicinal-aromatic-plants-polymerase-chain

Figure 1: Detection of 16S rRNA gene from Campylobacter jejuni isolated from poultry samples using polymerase chain reaction. Lanes from left to right are M-100 bp DNA ladder, 1)-Campylobacter jejuni ATCC 29428 (positive control), 2-6) E. coli 0157:H7 (negative control), 10-3, 1, 10-2, 10-5, 14-2 7) Campylobacter jejuni isolate #17-1, 8-9) 7, 10-1 10)- Campylobacter jejuni isolate #14-5, 11)- Campylobacter jejuni isolated #1-3 and 12) Campylobacter jejuni isolate # 8, 14 and 15) 11-4 and 4.

PCR identification

Twelve (38.7%) isolates were positive by PCR for 16s rRNA, indicating the presence of the gene encoding a highly conserved region of the Genus Campylobacter. These isolates positive for the 16s rRNA gene were further characterized for their ability to produce cytotoxic effects on CHO cell and also determine the role of Bitter Melon extract on the virulence and cell mediated cytotoxicity of C. jejuni in cell culture.

Cell adhesion assay without Bitter Melon extract

Results of this experiment showed that percent cell adhesion ranges from 0.34-31.9% by the C. jejuni isolates 14-5 and 17-1 respectively (Figure 2), when inoculated on CHO cells. Highest percentage of cell adhesion was observed in C. jejuni isolates 17-1 (31.9%) followed by the isolate 2-F (31%) and then 5A (20.7%). Lowest percentage of cell adhesion was observed in C. jejuni isolate 14-5 (0.34%). Control strain of C. jejuni ATCC 29428 showed 12.2% cell adhesion. C. jejuni isolates 1230 and 950 showed similar percentages of cell adhesion (8.6%). Thus, these results showed that C. jejuni isolates 17-1 and 14-5 had the maximum and minimum capacity to adhere the CHO cells respectively (Figure 2).

medicinal-aromatic-plants-Percent-cell

Figure 2: Percent cell adhesion of various strains of Campylobacter jejuni on Chinese hamster ovary cells.

Cell invasion assay without Bitter Melon extract

Outcomes of this study showed that percent of cell invasion by C. jejuni isolates ranged from 0.2%-5.2%, when inoculated on CHO cells (Figure 3). Highest percent of cell invasion was observed by C. jejuni ATCC 29428 (5.2%), then isolate 5A and 961 (2.6%). C. jejuni isolates 8, 11-4, 17-1 and 1-3 showed the least cell invasion (0.2%) on CHO cell (Figure 3).

medicinal-aromatic-plants-various-strains

Figure 3: Percent cell invasion of various strains of Campylobacter jejuni on Chinese hamster ovary cells.

Cell adhesion with Bitter Melon extract

Cell adhesion assay was performed using C. jejuni ATCC 29428 and FCA 40 isolate on CHO cells in the presence of Bitter Melon extract at 25, 5, 2.5 and 0.5% concentrations. Minimum percent of cell adhesion of C. jejuni isolate ATCC 29428 on CHO cells was observed at 25% concentration of Bitter Melon extract (0.17%), where as Bitter Melon extract at 0.5% concentration showed high percent of cell adhesion (8.3%) (Figure 4). FCA 40 isolate of C. jejuni showed minimum percent of cell adhesion on CHO cells of 2.6% at 25% concentration of Bitter Melon extract and highest at 0.5% concentration of Bitter Melon extracts (8.8%) (Figure 4). C. jejuni ATCC 29428 and FCA 40 grown in the presence of 25% Bitter Melon extract showed minimum cell adhesion on CHO cells, which indicates that Bitter Melon extract had adverse effects on the growth of C. jejuni and also help to reduce the infectious capability of the organism.

medicinal-aromatic-plants-ovary-cells

Figure 4: Percent cell adhesion of Campylobacter jejuni strains ATCC 29428 and FCA 40 in the presence of 25%, 5%, 2.5% and 0.5% concentrations of ethanol extract Bitter Melon on Chinese hamster ovary cells.

Cell invasion with Bitter Melon extract

Cell invasion assay was performed using C. jejuni ATCC 29428 and FCA 40 isolate on CHO cells in the presence of Bitter Melon extract at 25, 5, 0.5 and 0.5% concentrations. Complete inhibition of cell invasion was observed in C. jejuni ATCC 29428 grown at 25% concentration of Bitter Melon extract. Results of the this study indicated that there was an increasing trend of invasion of C. jejuni ATCC 29428 isolate with the decreased percent of Bitter Melon extract in which it was grown (Figure 5). FCA 40 isolate of C. jejuni grown at 25% concentration of Bitter Melon extract did not show any cell invasion into CHO cells, but FCA 40 isolate grown at 0.5% concentrations of Bitter Melon, showed 5.3% of cell invasion into CHO cells (Figure 5).

medicinal-aromatic-plants-Chinese-hamster

Figure 5: Percent cell invasion of Campylobacter jejuni strains ATCC 29428 and FCA 40 in the presence of 25%, 5%, 2.5% and 0.5% concentrations of ethanol extract Bitter Melon on Chinese hamster ovary cells.

Lactate dehydrogenase assay without Bitter Melon extract

After 16 hour of exposure of CHO cells to C. jejuni ATCC 29428 and FCA 40, LDH assay was performed using a cytotoxicity kit (Boehringer Mannheim, Anaheim, CA). Figure 6 shows the percent LDH released from CHO cells, when treated with various strains of C. jejuni. Maximum percent of LDH release was caused by C. jejuni ATCC 29428 (99%) followed by FCA 40, 8 and 17-1 (91%, 74% and 70% respectively). The lowest percent of LDH enzyme release was caused by C. Jejuni isolates 2F and 14-5 strains (28%). Thus, the strains C. jejuni ATCC 29428 has the ability to cause maximum cell damage releasing highest percent of LDH enzyme followed by FCA 40, 8 and 17-1 (Figure 6). The outcomes of this experiment also showed that C. jejuni strains 2F and 14-5 have the minimum ability to cause CHO cell damage.

medicinal-aromatic-plants-Lactate-dehydrogenase

Figure 6: Lactate dehydrogenase release from Chinese hamster ovary cells after 16 hour of exposure to various strains of Campylobacter jejuni.

Lactate dehydrogenase assay with Bitter Melon extract

After 16 hour of exposure of CHO cells to C. jejuni ATCC 29428 and FCA 40 strains grown in the presence of the various concentrations of Bitter Melon, LDH assay was performed using LDH kit. As shown in figure 7, the values of percent LDH release were observed ranging from 97% (ATCC 29428 with 0.5 % Bitter Melon extract) to 61% (ATCC 29428 with 25% Bitter Melon extract). LDH release was lowest percent in the CHO cells treated with 25% of Bitter Melon extract and highest in the CHO cells treated with 0.5% Bitter Melon extract. C. jejuni strain FCA 40 was observed to have minimum LDH release with 25% concentration of Bitter Melon extract (44%) and maximum LDH release with 0.5% concentration of Bitter Melon extract (73%) on CHO cells (Figure 7). The cytotoxic effects of C. jejuni ATCC 29428 and FCA 40 was inhibited due to the presence of Bitter Melon extract at 25% concentration, which resulted in reduce cell damage and less percent of LDH released.

medicinal-aromatic-plants-Bitter-Melon

Figure 7: Percent Lactate dehydrogenase release by Chinese hamster ovary cells after 16 hour of exposure to Campylobacter jejuni strains ATCC 29428 and FCA 40 in the presence of 25%, 5%, 2.5% and 0.5% concentrations of Bitter Melon extract.

Alkaline phosphatase assay without Bitter melon

After 16 h of exposure of CHO cells to C. jejuni ATCC 29428 and FCA 40, AP assay was performed using AP substrate at 405/595 nm wave length. Both the strains were observed to have 100% AP release from CHO cells, indicating that both the strains are highly pathogenic and cause complete cell damage.

Alkaline phosphatase assay with Bitter Melon extract

AP assay was performed using CHO cells in the presence of 25, 5, 2.5 and 0.5% concentration of Bitter Melon extract. After 16 h of exposure of CHO cells to C. jejuni ATCC 29428 and FCA 40 grown in the presence of the above mentioned concentrations of Bitter melon, AP assay was performed using AP substrate at 405/595 nm wavelength.

Results of this experiment showed that percent AP release was ranged from 100% (ATCC 29428 with 0.5 % Bitter Melon extract) to 41% (ATCC 29428 with 25% Bitter Melon extract) (Figure 8). Percent AP released from CHO cells was lowest treated with 25% Bitter Melon extract and highest in the CHO cells treated with 0.5% Bitter Melon extract.

medicinal-aromatic-plants-Alkaline-phosphatase

Figure 8: Percent Alkaline phosphatase release by Chinese hamster ovary cells after 16 hour of exposure to Campylobacter jejuni strains ATCC 29428 and FCA 40 in the presence of 25%, 5%, 2.5% and 0.5% concentrations of Bitter Melon extract.

Discussion

According to World Health Organization, Campylobacter spp. is currently the bacterial foodborne pathogen causing the highest number of gastrointestinal disease in developed countries (www.who.int). Campylobacter jejuni is the most common zoonosis and the main cause of bacterial gastroenteritis in the western world [31]. Several reports showed that annual C. Jejuni infection is about 1% of the US and EU populations [32,33]. Ogundipe et al. [34] reported that the phytochemical extract from the morphological parts of Mallotus oppositifolium exhibited minimum inhibitory concentration and minimum bacterial concentrations of 32.5 micro g/ml and 65 micro g/ ml against Pseudomonas aeruginosa NCTC 6750 and 25 micro g/ml and 50 micro g/ml against Staphylococcus aureus NCTC 6571 respectively [35]. These values obtained were similar to the therapeutic drugs. Mahony et al. [35] demonstrated that turmeric was the most effective against Helicobacter pylori, followed by ginger, cumin, chili, borage, black caraway, oregano and liquorice. Extract of turmeric, borage and parsley showed the ability to inhibit the adhesion of Helicobacter jejuni to the stomach wall. Thus, in this study it observed that the consumption of plants, which have the ability to prevent adhesion of Helicobacter pylori to the stomach wall, would be an excellent alternative for the drugs therapy during infections [35].

Results of this experiment also support the above findings. When CHO cells were infected with C. jejuni without any phytochemicals, the percent cell adhesion ranges from 0.34–31.9% by the C. jejuni isolates 14-5 and 17-1 respectively. Control strain of C. jejuni ATCC 29428 showed 12.2% cell adhesion. When CHO cells were infected with C. jejuni and treated with different concentrations of Bitter Melon extract, it substantially reduced the cell adhesion. When CHO cells were infected with control strains of C. jejuni ATCC 29428 and FCA 40 and treated with 25% of Bitter Melon extract, the cell adhesion were 0.17% and 2.6% respectively compared to control (without Bitter Melon extract were 12.2% and 17% respectively). Truiti Mda et al. [36] reported that ethanol extract of Chaptalia nutans root (7-O-beta-D-glucopyranosylnutanocoumarin) effectively inhibit Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis at concentrations of 62.5 g/ml and 125 g/ml, respectively. [36]. Yarrow (Achillea millefolium) is recognized as a powerful medicinal extract showed antibacterial activity against S. Typhimurium and S. aureus with predicted MICs on the order of 10 s of μg/mL or 10 s of mg/mL, respectively [37]. Maldonado et al. [38] reported that E. coli isolated from environmental and food sources where studied for their potential cytotoxicity on African green monkey kidney (Vero, CCL- 81) cells [38]. The food isolates exhibited greater LDH release from the vero cells compared to the environmental isolates. Seventy-one percent (71%) of the food isolates showed high percentage of LDH activity i.e. >50. The outbreak and food isolates exhibited high levels of cytotoxicity. Kang et al. [39] transfected the CHO-K1 with bovine prion protein gene (Prnp) responsible for the bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) and studied cellular changes using LDH assay [39]. Transfected cells showed a relative higher LDH release (6.3%) when compared to wild-type cells (2.7%). The LDH assay suggested that exogenous and endogenous expression of prion protein decreases the cell viability. Kalischuk et al. [40] studied the cytotoxic effect to C. jejuni on human colonic epithelial cell line with a crypt-like phenotype, T84 cells using the LDH enzyme release assay [1]. The C. jejuni treated monolayer showed increased cytotoxicity in 3-hours of inoculation. Gray et al. [41] reported that the toxins of Bacillus cereus and Bacillus thuringiensis using Ped-2E9 cell and CHO cell [41]. They reported that B. cereus and B. thuringiensis exhibiting an alkaline phosphatase activity of >16% were considered cytotoxic strains. Strains with NHE (diarrheal enterotoxin) complex and alkaline phosphatase of >16% were shown to cytotoxic, therefore identified as the pathogenic strains.

Results of this experiment demonstrated that when CHO cells were infected with C. jejuni without Bitter Melon extract, it released high amount of LDH and AP enzymes compared to cells treated with Bitter Melon extract. When CHO cells were infected with C. jejuni ATCC 29428 and FCA 40 (controls) for 16 hour, LDH released was 99% and 91% respectively. Similar trends were observed when CHO cells were infected with various isolates of C. jejuni from poultry samples. When CHO cells were infected with C. jejuni isolates 8 and 17-1 for 16 hour, LDH released was 74% and 70% respectively. When CHO cells were infected with C. jejuni ATCC 29428 and FCA 40 (controls) for 16 hour and treated with 25% Bitter Melon extract, LDH released was significantly lower 61% and 44% respectively compared to controls. These results demonstrated that cytotoxic effects of C. jejuni ATCC 29428 and FCA 40 isolates were inhibited by 25% concentration of Bitter Melon extract, which resulted in reduced cell damage and less LDH released. Same trend was observed, when CHO cells were infected with C. jejuni ATCC 29428 and FCA 40 (controls) for 16 hour and treated with 25% Bitter Melon extract, AP released was significantly lower 41% and 35% respectively compared to CHO cells without Bitter Melon extract (100%).

References

  1. Tauxze RV (1992) Epidemiology of Campylobacter jejuni infections in the United States and other industrial nations. Nachamkin, I, Blaser MJ, and Tomkins LS. Campylobacter jejuni current status and future trends. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. 9-12.
  2. Hopkins RS, Olmsted R, Istre GR (1984) Endemic Campylobacter jejuni infection in Colorado: identified risk factors. Am J Public Health 74: 249-250.
  3. Schmid GP, Schaefer RE, Plikaytis BD, Schaefer JR, Bryner JH, et al. (1987) A one-year study of endemic Campylobacteriosis in a midwestern city: association with consumption of raw milk. J Infect Dis 156: 218-222.
  4. Lighton LL, Kaczmarski EB, Jones DM (1991) A study of risk factors for Campylobacter infection in late spring. Public Health 105: 199-203.
  5. Kapperud G, Skjerve E, Bean NH, Ostroff SM, Lassen J (1992) Risk factors for sporadic Campylobacter infections: results of a case-control study in southeastern Norway. J Clin Microbiol 30: 3117-3121.
  6. Oosterom J, den Uyl CH, Bänffer JR, Huisman J (1984) Epidemiological investigations on Campylobacter jejuni in households with a primary infection. J Hyg (Lond) 92: 325-332.
  7. Harris NV, Weiss NS, Nolan CM (1986) The role of poultry and meats in the etiology of Campylobacter jejuni/coli enteritis. Am J Public Health 76: 407-411.
  8. Deming MS, Tauxe RV, Blake PA, Dixon SE, Fowler BS, et al. (1987) Campylobacter enteritis at a university from eating chickens and from cats. Am J Epidemiol 126: 526-534.
  9. Norkrans G, Svedhem A (1982) Epidemiological aspects of Campylobacter jejuni enteritis. J Hyg (Lond) 89: 163-170.
  10. World Health Organization, WHO, (2009), WHO/FAO, (World Health Organization/ Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) Risk assessment of Campylobacter spp Broiler chickens: technical report Microbiological risk assessment series no 12 (2009), 132 Geneva.
  11. Bull SA, Allen VM, Domingue G, Jørgensen F, Frost JA, et al. (2006) Sources of Campylobacter spp. colonizing housed broiler flocks during rearing. Appl Environ Microbiol 72: 645–652.
  12. Gilbert C, Slavik M (2004) Determination of toxicity of Campylobacter jejuni isolated from humans and from poultry carcasses acquired at various stages of production. J Appl Microbiol 97: 347–353.
  13. Nielsen EM, Engberg J, Madsen M (1997) Distribution of serotypes of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli from Danish patients, poultry, cattle and swine. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 19: 47-56.
  14. Murphy GS Jr, Echeverria P, Jackson LR, Arness MK, LeBron C, et al. (1996) Ciprofloxacin- and azithromycin-resistant Campylobacter causing traveler's diarrhea in U.S. troops deployed to Thailand in 1994. Clin Infect Dis 22: 868-869.
  15. Piddock LJ (1995) Quinolone resistance and Campylobacter spp. J Antimicrob Chemother 36: 891-898.
  16. Jacobs-Reitsma WF, Kan CA, Bolder NM (1996) The induction of quinolone resistance in Campylobacter bacteria in broilers by quinolone treatment. In: Campylobacters, helicobacters, and related organisms. Newell DG, Ketley JM, Feldman RA, editors. New York: Plenum Press 307-311.
  17. Mahajan S, Rodgers FG (1990) Isolation, characterization, and host-cell-binding properties of a cytotoxin from Campylobacter jejuni. J Clin Microbiol 28: 1314-1320.
  18. Hu L, Kopecko DJ (2000) Interactions of Campylobacter with eukaryotic cells: gut luminal colonization and mucosal invasion mechanisms, 191-215.
  19. Konkel ME, Joens LA (1989) Adhesion to and Invasion of HEp-2 Cells by Campylobacter spp. Infection and immunity 57: 2984-2990.
  20. Frost JA, Kramer JM, Gillanders SA (1999) Phage typing of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli and its use as an adjunct to serotyping. Epidemiol Infect 123: 47-55.
  21. Inglis GD, Kalischuk LD, Busz HW, Kastelic JP (2005) Colonization of cattle intestines by Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter lanienae. Appl Environ Microbiol 71: 5145-5153.
  22. Galanis E (2007) Campylobacter and bacterial gastroenteritis. CMAJ 177: 570-571.
  23. Wardak S, Szych J, Duda U (2007) Antimicrobial susceptibilities of Campylobacter sp strains isolated from humans in 2005 to 2006 in Bielsko-Biala Region, Poland. Med Dosw Mikrobiol. 59: 43-49.
  24. Oyarzabal OA, Macklin KS, Barbaree JM, Miller RS (2005) Evaluation of agar plates for direct enumeration of Campylobacter spp. from poultry carcass rinses. Appl Environ Microbiol 71: 3351-3354.
  25. Hutchinson DN, Bolton FJ (1984) Improved blood free selective medium for the isolation of Campylobacter jejuni from faecal specimens. J Clin Pathol 37: 956–957.
  26. Woo PC, Leung KW, Tsoi HW, Wong SS, Teng JL, et al. (2002) Thermo-tolerant Campylobacter fetus bacteraemia identified by 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing: an emerging pathogen in immunocompromised patients. J Med Microbiol 51: 740–746.
  27. Francis CL, Starnbach MN, Falkow S (1992) Morphological and cytoskeletal changes in epithelial cells occur immediately upon interaction with Salmonella Typhimurium grown under low-oxygen conditions. Mol Microbiol 6: 3077-3087.
  28. Durant JA, Lowry VK, Nisbet DJ, Stanker LH, Corrier DE, et al. (1999) Short-chain fatty acids affect cell-association and invasion of HEp-2 cells by Salmonella Typhimurium. J Environ Sci Health B 34: 1083-1099.
  29. MacBeth KJ, Lee CA (1993) Prolonged inhibition of bacterial protein synthesis abolishes Salmonella invasion. Infect. Immun. 61: 1544-1546.
  30. McCarthy ND, Colles FM, Dingle KE, Bagnall MC, Manning G, et al. (2007) Host-associated Genetic Import in Campylobacter jejuni. Emerg Infect Dis 13: 267-272.
  31.  Humphrey T, O'Brien S, Madsen M (2007) Campylobacters as zoonotic pathogens: a food production perspective. Int J Food Microbiol 117: 237-257.
  32. Weisent J, Seaver W, Odoi A, Rohrbach B (2010) Comparison of three time-series models for predicting campylobacteriosis risk. Epidemiol Infect 138: 898-906.
  33. Ogundipe OO, Moody JO, Fakeye TO, Ladipo OB (2000) Antimicrobial activity of Mallotus oppositifolium extractives. Afr J Med Med Sci 29: 281-283.
  34. O'Mahony R, Al-Khtheeri H, Weerasekera D, Fernando N, Vaira D, et al. (2005) Bactericidal and anti-adhesive properties of culinary and medicinal plants against Helicobacter pylori. World J Gastroenterol. 11: 7499-7507.
  35. Truiti Mda C, Sarragiotto MH, de Abreu Filho BA, Nakamura CV, Dias Filho BP (2003) In vitro antibacterial activity of a 7-O-beta-D-glucopyranosyl-nutanocoumarin from Chaptalia nutans (Asteraceae). Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 98: 283-286.
  36. Frey FM, Meyers R (2010) Antibacterial activity of traditional medicinal plants used by Haudenosaunee peoples of New York State. BMC Complement Altern Med 10: 64.
  37. Maldonado Y, Fiser JC, Nakatsu CH, Bhunia AK (2005) Cytotoxicity potential and genotypic characterization of Escherichia coli isolates from environmental and food sources. App and enviro micro 71: 1890–1898.
  38. Kang SG, Lee DY, Kang ML, Yoo HS (2007) Biological characteristics of Chinese hamster ovary cells transfected with bovine Prnp. J Vet Sci 8: 131–137.
  39. Kalischuk LD, Inglis GD, Buret AG (2007) Strain-dependent induction of epithelial cell oncosis by Campylobacter jejuni is correlated with invasion ability and is independent of cytolethal distending toxin. Microbiology 153: 2952–2963.
  40. Gray KM, Banada PP, O'Neal E, Bhunia AK (2005) Rapid Ped-2E9 Cell-Based Cytotoxicity Analysis and Genotyping of Bacillus Species. J Clin Microbiol. 43: 5865–5872.
Citation: Khatiwada J, Kallur V, Davis S, Washington D, Smith D, et al. (2013) Effect of Momordica Charantia on the Cytotoxic and Virulence Responses of Campylobacter Jejuni Isolated from Poultry Fecal Samples. Med Aromat Plants 2:117.

Copyright: © 2012 Khatiwada J, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top