Fungal Genomics & Biology

Fungal Genomics & Biology
Open Access

ISSN: 2165-8056

Review Article - (2018) Volume 8, Issue 2

Brevibacillus Spp. in Agroecology: The Beneficial Impacts in Biocontrol of Plant Pathogens and Soil Bioremediation

Ahmed IS Ahmed1*, Amal M Omer2, Amr IM Ibrahim1 and Mohamed K Agha1
1Plant Protection Department, Desert Research Center, Cairo, Egypt
2Soil Fertilization and Microbiology Department, Desert Research Center, Cairo, Egypt
*Corresponding Author: Ahmed IS Ahmed, Plant Protection Department, Desert Research Center, Cairo, Egypt, Tel: +201003871788 Email:

Abstract

The genus Bacillus and related genera are distributed vastly in nature and contain thermophilic, psychrophilic, alkalophilic, acidophilic, and halophilic bacteria that utilize a wide range of carbon sources for autotrophs or heterotrophic growth. A lot of bioactive metabolites have been detected, as bioactive compounds produced by biocontrol agents such as the bacterial genus of Brevibacillus. In this review, we summarize the general characteristics and properties of the Brevibacillus genus as biocontrol agents, taxonomy, phylogeny, identification and the impact of Brevibacillus as a biological control agent of plant disease combat and soil bioremediation.

 

Keywords: Brevibacillus; Bioremediation; Chemical pesticides; Morphology; Biocontrol agents; Phylogeny

Introduction

The agricultural is one of the most significant sectors in related to productivity and economies around the globe in achieving food security and to benefit directly from the natural resources, forestry, and other benefits. In the same time, the agricultural sector suffers a lot of challenges and problems for many reasons, including climate change, water scarcity and excessive use of chemical pesticides, chemical fertilizers. Population growth also is the severe challenge where in the year 2050 it is estimated that the world’s population will have reached 9.7 billion, and worldwide crop production will need to increase twofold in order to cover the demand by this time [1,2].

A large number of phytopathogens are causal disease agents in all plant types. Their effects range from low to higher impacts in large areas planted to economical food crops. Phyto pathogens are challenges to control because the pathogenic populations are variable in time, space, and genotypic variations. At the scientific and political stage, there is a need to know that there is a link between plant diseases and food security [3,4].

The environmental stresses like soil salinity, drought, and lack or increase nutrients, had also been affected plants with herbicides are important challenges in plant production. An alternative to conventional methods for improving plant disease resistance is biological control methods [5]. Biological control of plant diseases can be defined as the use of organisms to influence the activities of a plant pathogen. Biocontrol organisms can be fungi, bacteria, and others.

Bacillus as a bacterial genus has a wide range of phenotypic strains of Gram-positive or Gram-variable, aerobic, endospore-forming, facultative anaerobic and rod-shaped [6,7]. Bacillus brevis was first characterized in 1900 [8] and was taxonomies as the type species Brevibacillus brevis of a new genus, Brevibacillus , with nine other species [9]. Recently there are more than twenty two species with validly published names under the genus Brevibacillus [9,10]. Determination the species is difficult because the poor reactivity of strains in conventional identification tests strains have useful differential phenotypic characteristics [10]. In Brevibacillus , the HV region sequence is highly conserved within a species but has diverged sufficiently between species to enable identification and grouping of Brevibacillus species by sequence comparisons of the HV region [10,11]. Brevibacillus is one of the most widespread genera of Grampositive bacteria, recorded from the diverse environmental habitats [5,10,11]. The high growth rate, better transformation efficiency by electroporation, production of the negligible amount of extracellular protease, and the constitutive expression of heterologous proteins so some strains of Brevibacillus genus are excellent as laboratory models. For various applications, this genus continues to be a source of various enzymes of effective bio control interest due to their ability to suppress some different species of the phytopathogens, ability to act as bio control agent [12,13,14]. This review article summarized the properties of Brevibacillus spp. as biological agents in plant disease control and bioremediation.

Morphology and Taxonomy of Brevibacillus

The genus Brevibacillus was originally proposed by Shida et al. [9] based on 16S rRNA gene sequence analyses of eleven species, it has belonged to the genus Bacillus and B. brevis was designated the type species [9]. This genus is Gram-positive or Gram-variable [12]. Ellipsoidal endospores are in swollen sporangia. Most species of this genus are aerobically on nutrient agar, yellowish grey, and smooth colonies. The DNA G+C content ranges from 40.2 to 57.4 mol% this description is according to Logan et al. [12]. Determine the phenotypic like acid production from carbohydrates) of members of the genus Brevibacillus is difficult [12]. Most species of Brevibacillus are difficult to distinguish from each other based solely on routine phenotypic tests.

The rod-shaped cells of Brevibacillus species are usually roundended, and occur singly, in pairs, and in chains. Cell diameters range from 0.7–1.0 μm and lengths from 3.0–6.0 μm, but the cells of a particular strain are quite regular in size, and individual species normally have dimensions within fairly narrow limits. Most of the species of Brevibacillus do not have distinctive sporangial morphologies; the spores are ellipsoidal, lie sub-terminally or perhaps terminally, and swell the sporangia slightly or moderately The notable exception is the unique sporangial morphology of Brevibacillus laterosporus which produces Parasporal Bodies (PBs) which laterally displace the spore in the sporangium, and which remain attached to the free spore. The ellipsoidal spores of this species may lie centrally, paracentrally, or subterminally, and they characteristically swell the sporangia into spindle shapes this detailed characterization is according to Logan et al. [12]. Characterization and features of Brevibacillus spp. were mentioned in some previous studies (Brevibacillus agri [15-17], Brevibacillus aydinogluensis [18], Brevibacillus borstelensis [9,17], Brevibacillus brevis [8,9], Brevibacillus centrosporus [16,17], Brevibacillus choshinensis [9,19], Brevibacillus fluminis [20], Brevibacillus formosus [9,17], Brevibacillus fulvus [19], Brevibacillus gelatini [18], Brevibacillus ginsengisoli [19], Brevibacillus halotolerans [20], Brevibacillus invocatus [15], Brevibacillus laterosporus [9,21], Brevibacillus levickii [11], Brevibacillus limnophilus [22], Brevibacillus nitrificans [23], Brevibacillus panacihumi [24], Brevibacillus parabrevis [9,25], Brevibacillus reuszeri [9,17], Brevibacillus sediminis [26]).

Isolation and Identification of Brevibacillus Strains

Brevibacillus strains were isolated from the natural environment such as soils, where they appear as saprophytes, while some isolates also were isolated from human illness. Brevibacillus species also isolated from heat treatment of specimens. The Brevibacillus spores in different environments but does not necessarily indicate that the organisms were able to metabolites production, but some isolates from different habitats produce the metabolites to make the Brevibacillus cells active.

In order to identify the unknown bacteria, examination of seven characteristics are necessary, e.g. (1. cell morphology, 2. colony morphology, 3. oxygen requirements for growth, 4. Gram stain reaction, 5. presence of endospores in a culture, 6. carbon source utilization, and 7. Motility), finally comparison according to Bergy’s manual. According to [27] gramicidin A and gramicidin S, the first linear and cyclic peptide antibiotics used clinically. After reclassifying B. brevis classified into Brevibacillus , the genus remained a reliable source for novel Antimicrobial Peptides (AMPs). AMPs produced by Brevibacillus spp. and the B. brevis were classified based on biosynthesis pathway and structural traits, where two groups of AMPs are recognized: 1 AMPs that target cell-surface components, i.e., cell wall, membrane and membrane-bound protein, and 2 AMPs that target intracellular components such as ribosomes, and the synthesis machinery for DNA and RNA [27]. The previous research reports divided all AMPs into four groups: sidechain-linked, linear polypeptide, sidechain-backbone linked, and backbone-backbone linked circular group. It has been served as a biological controlling agent with various biological activities [27].

Characterization and General Features of some Brevibacillus Species

Brevibacillus thermoruber : Optimal growth at 45–48°C, high G/C content (57 ± 0.8 mol %) and endocellular, nondiffusible pigment [9].

Brevibacillus agri : Non-pigmented Colonies, Catalase positive. Strictly aerobic. Growth at pH 5.6–5.7. The growth temperature 28°C. The DNA buoyant density 1.7055–1.7084 g/cm3; the G/C content 52– 55 mol% [16,17].

Brevibacillus borstelensis : Produces soluble brown-red pigment on nutrient agar. Strictly aerobic. Catalase positive and oxidase negative. Growth occurs at pH 5.5–5.6. Specific S-layer proteins present. High G/C content [9,17].

Brevibacillus centrosporus : Non-pigmented colonies. Catalase positive. Strictly aerobic.The optimum growth temperature 28°C. The DNA buoyant density 1.7025–1.7045 g/cm3; G/C content 49–51 mol% [16,17].

Brevibacillus choshinensis : Utilization the citrate, ammonium and acid production. High G/C content [9,19].

Brevibacillus formosus : Smooth, flat, circular, and entire colonies. Strictly aerobic. Catalase positive and oxidase negative. Growth occurs at pH 5.5–5.6. Specific S-layer proteins present. High G/C content [9,17].

Brevibacillus brevis : Strictly aerobic, produces gramicidin, 45–56 mol% as range of G/C values [8,9].

Brevibacillus parabrevis : Positive for reduction of nitrate to nitrite, utilization of ammonium, hydrolysis of casein, gelatin, DNA, and Tween 60. From 51.3 to 53.3 mol as % G/C content ranges [9,25].

Brevibacillus reuszeri : Strictly aerobic. Catalase positive and oxidase negative. Growth occurs at pH 5.5–5.6. Specific S-layer proteins present. 46.4 to 46.7 mol% as G/C content range [9,17].

Brevibacillus invocatus : Brownish-yellow colonies, positive in catalase. from 15 to 35C as growth temperature, pH 6–8. Range of G/C content is 49.1–49.8 mol% [15].

Brevibacillus limnophilus : Temperature for growth ranged from 20 to 45°C; optimum growth temperature 30–35°C. Optimum pH 7.0–7.5. Main quinone MK-7.G/C content 51.9 mol% [22].

Brevibacillus levickii : Utilizes K antiport system and similar energy systems for the uptake of L-glutamic acid [11].

Brevibacillus ginsengisoli : At 20–42 °C Growth temprature, pH 5.0– 8.5, iso-C15:0, iso-C14:0, and anteiso-C15:0 are the major cellular fatty acids.G/C content 52.1 mol% [19].

Brevibacillus panacihumi : Aerobic, grow at 15–42°C (optimum 30°C) and at pH 5–9 while (optimum, pH 7). The major cellular fatty acids iso-C15:0, anteiso-C15:0, iso-C14:0, and iso-C16:0. G/C content 50.1–50.5 mol% [24].

Brevibacillus fluminis : White pigment, strictly aerobic and motile. The G/C content 52.4 mol% [20].

Brevibacillus aydinogluensis : Moderately thermophilic. The major fatty acids iso-C15: 0 (39.30%), anteiso-C15: 0 (26.10%), and iso-C16: 0 (14.75%).The major isoprenoid quinone MK-7. G/C content 56.09 mol% [18].

Brevibacillus nitrificans : Grows at pH 5–8 growth temprature, with optimum growth at pH 7. The major isoprenoid quinone MK-7. G/C content 54.1 mol% [23].

Brevibacillus laterosporus : Rapidly lose their characteristic appearance and assume a fusiform or spindle shape with a swollen middle and pointed ends. Flat, transparent, and irregular colonies [9,21].

Biocontrol and Bioremediation

Brevibacillus brevis produced useful peptide antibiotic gramicidin S, which attacks the lipid bilayer of the membranes of organisms [28]. Brevibacillus strains with antifungal properties are potentially valuable biocontrol agents. These include a Bacillus brevis strain active against fusarium wilt of pigeon pea [29] and a Brevibacillus laterosporus effective against wheat foliar necrotrophic [30]. Edwards and Seddon [13] found that gramicidin S produced by B. brevis , is sporicidal to conidia of B. cinerea , and is less inhibitory towards growth of mycelium. Omar and Ahmed [27] studied inhibitory and antagonistic impact of some rhizobacteria against various isolates of Fusarium on Sage plants, they concluded that, Rhizo-bacterial strains namely Brevibacillus brevis Brevibacillus agri , and Brevibacillus formosus which have high effects in suppression of Salvia officinalis wilt and root rot diseases effectiveness probably due to the production of several inhibitory metabolites like HCN, chitinase, and siderophore. Ahmed [28] studied the effect of Brevibacillus formosus strain DSM 9885 and Brevibacillus brevis strain NBRC 15304 as a biological control agent on potato brown leaf spot disease caused by Alternaria alternata , the study demonstrated that the use of the tested Brevibacillus strains could enhance resistance to brown leaf spot in potato. The linear mycelial growth and spore germination of A. alternata was inhibited by both of tested bacterial isolates with reduction of disease symptoms, where the effects were determined in vitro through detached leaves and under greenhouse conditions. Protein profiling by SDS-PAGE revealed that some bands of protein are produced due to the Brevibacillus as biocontrol agents. So Ahmed [28] concluded that B. formosus strain DSM 9885, and B. brevisstrain NBRC 15304 could be considered as part of management tools for reducing the impact of A. alternata causing brown leaf spot disease on potato [31,32].

Brevibacillus is playing an important role as bio-remediation factor to combat the contamination resulted by toxic metals and reduce the environmental pollution in agricultural soils, water, and the atmosphere. Toxic metals can also have massive detrimental effects on soil ecosystems and the environment [33]. Soil contamination by metal is seriously problematic because of the strong adsorption of many metals to the surfaces of soil particles. From a physiological point of view, metals fall into three main categories: 1) basically non-toxic e.g. Ca and Mg, 2) essential but harmful at high concentrations, typically Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu, Co, Ni and Mo, and 3) toxic e.g. Hg, Pb or Cd [34]. Soil remediation contaminated with heavy metals also problem because metals are difficult to degrade. Bioremediation, i.e. the use of living organisms to manage or remediate heavy metal-polluted soils, is an emerging technology. It is defined as the elimination, reduction or transformation of polluting or contaminating substances through the use of biological tools, and it is a genuine option for removing industrial pollution from the environment [35]. Soil microorganisms play important roles in bioremediation or biotransformation processes [36]. Microorganisms can interact with metal contaminants and transform these metals from one chemical form to another by changing their chemical and physical states through addition or removal of oxidation electrons [37-39], or by stimulating changes in the microbial population balance, for instance by using it as a biological control tools against plant pathogens [40]. Some Brevibacillus spp . were able s synthesis 3.8 mg/L indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) in vitro and this might have contributed to the beneficial effects noticed, since the production of IAA or ethylene has been suggested as a mechanism for plant growth promotion under heavy metal stress. Mullen et al. [38] mentioned that soil bacteria associated with the clay and organic fractions of the soil microenvironment and would be expected to engage in the metal dynamics typically attributed to these soil fractions as well as a strictly physical cellular interface should have a great ability for sorbing metals from solutions. Another mechanism by which Brevibacillus sp. could have contributed to the protection of plants against Pb toxicity is by induction of root exudates which have a variety of roles. Some previous research reports mentioned to the valuable role of bacteria or mycorrhizal-colonization in plants growing in metal-contaminated sites [41-44]. B. brevis behaved as a PGPR, but its notable effect on root biomass was greater than that shown on the shoot. B. brevis also played an effective role as a Mycorrhizae-Helper (MH) bacterium [45-47].

Mycorrhizal root development, when related to B. brevis , was less negatively affected by Ni stress conditions. These findings could be relevant for improving growth of plant and nutrient. Different strategies would be involved in prohibiting plant toxicity disadvantage. Changes in uptake of metal and internal transportation storage could give tolerance of metal to the host plant [48]. Applying the microbial mixture (AM fungus and/or B. brevis ) probably induce tolerance to Ni by affecting metal availability and uptake. Changes in root exudates, pH and physicochemical characteristics of the soil [49] may be involved and such changes could decrease metal root uptake or translocation from root to shoot tissue. The benefits that legume plants obtain from the AM symbiosis under Ni stress are more relevant in coinoculations with B. brevis . The B. brevis strain studied has a cellular mechanism as bio-sorption and bioaccumulation that involved in the detoxification of Zn in the medium of growth. Metabolic abilities may be related to the Zn tolerance and also to the Zn reduction in the medium Burd et al. [47] suggested that this bacteria used to plant protection against the inhibitory effects of high concentrations of Zn is related to their ability to encourage plant growth by synthesis of Indol, as has been shown for many PGPRs [50-52], so, PGP bacteria can facilitate plant growth by modifying the plant hormonal balance. Another study aimed to investigate the effect of B. brevis on the axenic development of G. mosseae in related to the rate of spore germination and hyphal development under different levels of Zn added to a water agar medium. Vivas et al. [50] reported that G. mosseae spores provided a 56% increase in growth of mycelium without Zn, and more than 130% increase with 200 mg Zn/mL, when treated with the bacterium inoculum, in comparison with uninoculated spores. Moreover, in a subsequent study, the same bacterium not only stimulated presymbiotic mycorrhizal fungal development but also the quality and quantity as metabolic characteristics of mycorrhizal colonization, with the improvement being for vitality of arbuscular and its activity.

Ruíz-Lozano et al. [51] reported that the isolation of efficient metaladapted microorganisms could be a usefully bio-technological tool for inoculation purposes in contaminated soils, they concluded that this sustainable system can be an important strategy in order to promote bio-remediation of heavy metal-polluted soils. A strain identified as Bacillusbrevis was isolated from soil contaminated with hexachlorocyclohexane where it degraded this polluting pesticide, another strain of this species was found to degrade the insecticide teflubenzuron reported that B. borstelensis gain a great ability to degrade the fungicide carbendazim from agricultural fields at high rates, especially when mixed with Streptomyces albogriseolus found that Brevibacillus agri strain CAT37 was able to degrade the thiols, decanethiol and dodecanethiol, and their corresponding autoxidation products, effectively after 30 days of incubation at 37 °C [52,53].

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the Nano-Phytopathology Lab- which was established with the full financial support of the Desert Research Center, Cairo, Egypt-through the Collaborative work in the research project entitled “Isolation and identification of fungi and bacteria from different Egyptian ecological habitats for bio-pesticides production”. The authors would like to thank all colleagues who contributed information useful to the preparation of this article.

References

  1. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2015) World population prospects: The 2015 revision, key findings and advance tables.
  2. Tilman D, Balzer C, Hill J, Befort BL (2011) Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. PNAS 108: 20260-64.
  3. Elmer W, White JC (2018) The future of nanotechnology in plant pathology. Ann Rev Phytopathol 56: 111-133.
  4. Bourke P, Zuizina D, HanL, Cullen PJ, Gilmore BF (2017) Microbiological interactions with cold plasma. J Appl Microbiol 123: 308-324.
  5. Ahmed AIS (2017) Efficacy of two potent soilborne Streptomyces spp. in controlling wilt and root rot disease of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) under greenhouse conditions. Int J Pharm Bio Sci 8 : 394-403
  6. Claus D, Berkeley CW (1986) The genus Bacillus. In: Sneath PHA, Mair NS, Sharpe ME, Holt JG (eds) Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1105.
  7. Nazina TN, Tourova TP, Poltaraus AB, Novikova EV, Grigoryan AA et al. (2001) Taxonomic study of aerobic thermophilic bacilli: descriptions of Geobacillus subterraneus gen. nov., sp. nov. and Geobacillus uzenensis sp. nov. from petroleum reservoirs and transfer of Bacillus stearothermophilus, Bacillus thermocatenulatus, Bacillus thermoleovorans, Bacillus kaustophilus, Bacillus thermodenitrificans to Geobacillus as the new combinations G. stearothermophilus, G. th. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51: 433–446.
  8. Shida O, Takagi H, Kadowaki K, Komagata K (1996) Proposal for two new genera, Brevibacillus gen nov and Aneurinibacillus gen nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 46: 939–946.
  9. Goto K, Fujita R, Kato Y, Asahara M, Yokota A (2004) Reclassification of Brevibacillus brevis strains NCIMB 13288 and DSM 6472 (5NRRL NRS-887) as Aneurinibacillus danicus sp. nov. and Brevibacillus limnophilus sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54: 419–427.
  10. Allan RN, Lebbe L, Heyrman J, De Vos P, BuchananCJ et al. (2005) Brevibacillus levickii sp. nov. and Aneurinibacillus terranovensis sp. nov., two novel thermoacidophiles isolated from geothermal soils of northern Victoria Land, Antarctica. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55: 1039–1050.
  11. De Vos P (2009) Genus IV. Brevibacillus Shida, Takagi, Kadowaki and Komagata 1996a, 942VP. In: Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (eds) Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology (2nd edn.). Springer, New York, 305–316.
  12. Edwards SG, Seddon B (2001) Mode of antagonism of Brevibacillus brevis against Botrytis cinerea in vitro. J Appl Microbiol 91: 652–659.
  13. Gupta A, Kaushik CP, KaushikA (2000) Degradation of hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH; α, β, γ, and δ) by Bacillus circulans and Bacillus brevis isolated from soil contaminated with HCH. Soil Biol Biochem 32: 1803–1805.
  14. Nakamura LK (1993) DNA relatedness of Bacillus brevis Migula 1900 strains and proposal of Bacillus agri sp. nov., nom. rev., and Bacillus centrosporus sp. nov., nom. rev. Int J Syst Bacteriol 43: 20–25.
  15. Inan K, Ozer A, Guler HI, Belduz AO, Canakci S (2016) Brevibacillus gelatini sp. nov., isolated from a hot spring. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66: 712–718.
  16. Takagi H, Shida O, Kadowaki K, Komagata K, Udaka S (1993) Characterization of Bacillus brevis, with descriptions of Bacillus migulanus sp. nov., Bacillus choshinensis sp. nov., Bacillus parabrevis sp. nov., and Bacillus galuctophilus sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 43: 221-231.
  17. Choi MJ, Bae JY, Kim KY, Kang H, Cha CJ (2010) Brevibacillus fluminis sp. nov., isolated from sediment of estuarine wetland. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 60: 1595–1599.
  18. Laubach CA (1916) Studies on aerobic spore-bearing non-pathogenic bacteria. Spore-bearing organisms in water. J Bacteriol 1: 505–512.
  19. Takebe F, Hirota K, Nodasaka Y, Yumota I (2012) Brevibacillus nitrificans sp. nov., a nitrifying bacterium isolated from a microbiological agent for enhancing microbial digestion in sewage treatment tanks. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 62: 2121–2126.
  20. Kim MK, Sathiyaraj S, Pulla RK, Yang DC (2009) Brevibacillus panacihumi sp. nov., a b-glucosidase-producing bacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59: 1227–123.
  21. Miyauchi A, Ozawa M, Mizukami M, Yashiro K, Ebisu S, et al. (1999) Structural conversion from non-native to native form of recombinant human epidermal growth factor by Brevibacillus choshinensis. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 63: 1965–1969.
  22. Xian WD, Yin YR, Liu L, Yuan CG, Hussain F, et al. (2016) Brevibacillus sediminis sp. nov., isolated from a hot spring. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66: 548–553.
  23. Prenner EJ, Lewis RN, McElhaneyRN (1999) The interaction of the antimicrobial peptide gramicidin S with lipid bilayer model and biological membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1462: 201–221.
  24. Bapat S, Shah AK (2000) Biological control of fusarial wilt of pigeon pea by Bacillus brevis. Can J Microbiol 46: 125–132.
  25. Alippi AM, PerelloAE, SisternaMN, Greco NM, CordoCA (2000) Potential of spore-forming bacteria as biocontrol agents of wheat foliar diseases under laboratory and greenhouse conditions. J Plant Dis Prot 107: 155–169.
  26. Omar AM, Ahmed AIS (2014) Antagonistic and inhibitory effect of some plant rhizo-bacteria against different Fusarium isolates on Salvia officinalis. American-Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci 14: 1437-1446.
  27. Ahmed AIS (2017) Biological control of potato brown leaf spot disease caused by Alternaria alternata Using Brevibacillus formosus Strain DSM 9885 and Brevibacillus brevis Strain NBRC 15304. J Plant Pathol Microbiol 8: 413.
  28. Khan MR, Saha ML, Afroz H (2001) Microorganisms associated with gemstones. Bangladesh J Bot 30: 93-96.
  29. Valls M, de Lorenzo V (2002) Exploiting the genetic and biochemical capacities of bacteria from the remediation of heavy metal pollutions. FEMS Microbiol Rev 26: 327–338.
  30. Wenzel WW (2009) Rhizosphere processes and management in plant-assisted bioremediation (phytoremediation) of soils. Plant Soil 321: 385–408.
  31. Kinkle BK, Sadowsky MJ, Johanstone K, Koskinen WC (1994) Tellurium and selenium resistance in Rhizobia and its potential use for direct isolation of Rhizobium meliloti from soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 60: 1674–77.
  32. Tabak H, Lens P, van Hullebusch ED, DejongheW (2005) Development in bioremediation of soils and sediments polluted with metals and radionuclides–1. Microbial processes and mechanisms affecting bioremediation of metal contamination and influencing metal toxicity and transport. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 4: 115–156.
  33. Meyer JR, Linderman RG (1986) Response of subterranean clover to dual inoculation with vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungia and a plant growth-promoting bacterium, Pseudomonas putida. Soil Biol Biochem 18: 185–190.
  34. Barea JM, Tobar RM, Azcon-Aguilar C (1996) Effect of a genetically modified Rhizobium meliloti inoculant on the development of arbuscular mycorrhizas, root morphology, nutrient uptake and biomass accumulation in Medicago sativa. New Phytol 134: 361–69.
  35. Weller DM, Thomashow LS (1994) Current challenges in introducing beneficial microorganisms in the rhizosphere. In: O’Gara F, Dowling DN, Boesten B (eds) Molecular ecology of rhizosphere microorganisms: biotechnology and the release of GMOs. VCH Verlagsgesellchaft, Winheim, 1–13.
  36. Pishchik VN, Vorobyev NI, Chernyaeva LL, Timofeeva SV, Kozhemyakov AP et al. (2002) Experimental and mathematical simulation of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and plant interaction under cadmium stress. Plant Soil 243: 173–186.
  37. Mullen MD, Wolf DC, Gerris FG, Beveridge TJ, Flemming CA, et al. (1989) Bacterial sorption of heavy metals. Appl Environ Microbiol 55: 3143–49.
  38. Shetty KG, Banks MK, Hetrick BA, Schwab AP (1994) Biological characterization of a southeast Kansas mining site. Water Air Soil Pollut 78: 169–177.
  39. Shetty KG, Hetrick BAD, Figge DAH, Schwab AP (1994) Effects of mycorrhizae and other soil microbes on revegetation of heavy metal contaminated mine spoil. Environ Pollut 86: 181–188.
  40. Garbaye J (1994) Helper bacteria: A new dimension to the mycorrhizal symbiosis. New Phytol 128: 197–210.
  41. Azcón R (1987) Germination and hyphal growth of Glomus mosseae in vitro: Effects of rhizospherebacteria and cell-free culture media. Soil Biol Biochem 19: 417–419.
  42. Germination and hyphal growth of Glomus mosseae in vitro: Effects of rhizospherebacteria and cell-free culture media. Soil Biol Biochem 19: 417–419.
  43. Vivas A, Biro B, Nemeth T, Barea JM, Azcon R (2006) Nickel-tolerant Brevibacillus brevis and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus can reduce metal acquisition and nickel toxicity effects in plant growing in nickel supplemented soil. Soil Biol Biochem 38: 2694–2704.
  44. Grichko VP, Filby B, Glick BR (2000) Increased ability of transgenic plants expressing the bacterial enzyme ACC deaminase to accumulate Cd, Co, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn. J Biotechnol 81: 45–53.
  45. Zhou JL (1999) Zn biosorption by Rhizopus arrhizus and other fungi. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 51: 686–69.
  46. Burd IG, Dixon DG, Glick BR (2000) Plant growth promoting bacteria that decrease heavy metal toxicity in plants. Can J Microbiol 46: 237–245.
  47. Xie H, Pasternak JJ, Glick BR (1996) Isolation and characterization of mutants of the plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Pseudomonas putida GR 12–2 that overproduce indoleacetic acid. Curr Microbiol 32: 67–71.
  48. Vivas A, Barea JM, Azcon R (2005) Brevibacillus brevis isolated from cadmium or zinc contaminated soils improves in vitro spore germination and growth of Glomus mosseae under high Cd or Zn concentrations. Microb Ecol 49: 416–424.
  49. Scholeske S, Maetz M, Schneider T, Hildebrandt U, Bothe H, et al. (2004) Element distribution in mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal roots of the halophyte Aster tripolium determined by proton induced X-ray emission. Protoplasma 223: 183–189.
  50. Ruíz-LozanoJM, Azcón R (2011) Brevibacillus, arbuscular mycorrhizae and remediation of metal toxicity in agricultural soils. In: N.A Logan, P. de Vos [eds.] Endospore-forming Soil Bacteria, Soil Biology. Springer- Verlag. Berlín, Heidelberg, Germany, 235-258.
  51. Vivas A, Barea JM, Biro B, Azcon R (2006) Effectiveness of authochthonous bacterium and mycorrhizal fungus on Trifolium growth, symbiotic development and soil enzymatic activities in Zn contaminated soil. J Appl Microbiol 100: 587–98.
  52. Arya R, Sharma AK (2016) Bioremediation of carbendazim, a benzimidazole fungicide using Brevibacillus borstelensis and Streptomyces albogriseolus together. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 17: 185–189.
Citation: Ahmed IS, Omer AM, Ibrahim, Agha MK (2018) Brevibacillus Spp. in Agroecology: The Beneficial Impacts in Biocontrol of Plant Pathogens and Soil Bioremediation . Fungal Genom Biol 8: 157.

Copyright: © 2018 Ahmed, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top