Clinical & Experimental Cardiology

Clinical & Experimental Cardiology
Open Access

ISSN: 2155-9880

+44 1300 500008

Editorial - (2013) Volume 4, Issue 9

Endothelialisation of Cardiovascular Implants–The Open Question

Matthias Sigler*
Pediatric Cardiology and Intensive Care, Georg-August University Goettingen, Germany
*Corresponding Author: Matthias Sigler, Pediatric Cardiology and Intensive Care, Georg-August University Goettingen, Robert-Koch-Str 40, D-37099 Goettingen, Germany

Nowadays, cardiovascular implants are employed for many indications and at almost every location throughout the cardiovascular system. Beside the surgical route, many other ways and methods have been developed for bringing the implant to its destiny in the human body. Heart surgeons, vessel surgeons, neurosurgeons, radiologists, cardiologists and pediatric cardiologists routinely perform implantations of a large variety of devices into blood vessels or into the heart.

But independently of which implant was implanted where or how, and who performed the procedure: the implant is and remains a foreign body. Foreign body surface exposure to the bloodstream is inevitable. And that means that there is a risk of superficial thrombus formation and subsequent embolisation with possible organ damage [1]. In this context, re-endothelialisation of cardiovascular devices following implantation is of major relevance since presence of endothelium is considered the natural and most effective prevention of superficial thrombus formation [2]. But the time gab after an interventional procedure until re-endothelialisation has taken place has to be bridged in order to minimize the risk of thromboembolic complications. This is why antiplatelet therapy is usually given for weeks or months although guidelines are missing except for prophylaxis against thrombus formation after coronary stent implantation [3,4], or after vascular bypass surgery [5]. For all other implants and indications, the best mode and duration of anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy is largely unknown.

With intent to find the right way to sufficiently prevent thrombus formation on the surface of cardiovascular devices, the following question has to be answered: What is the time course of reendothelialisation?

Most data from histological examinations of cardiovascular implants demonstrate that re-endothelialisation does occur. But there is little information on the time course of this process. Most authors state that formation of superficial endothelium on vascular foreign bodies happens within three to six months [6-8]. But we know that thrombus formation can definitely occur later [9-11].

What is to do? All implants that happen to be explanted should be carefully evaluated with the question of endothelialisation in order to better understand mechanisms and the time course of reendothelialisation. That would give a better basis for the decision which patient has to receive antiplatelet theray for how long. And every patient who has received an intracardiac or intravascular device should undergo clinical and sonographic examinations on a regular basis in order to detect possible problems as soon as possible.

References

  1. Forbes CD, Prentice CR (1978) Thrombus formation and artificial surfaces. Br Med Bull 34: 201-207.
  2. Vane JR, Anggård EE, Botting RM (1990) Regulatory functions of the vascular endothelium. N Engl J Med 323: 27-36.
  3. ten Berg JM, Plokker HT, Verheugt FW (2001) Antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy in elective percutaneous coronary intervention. Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med 2: 129-140.
  4. O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, Casey DE Jr, Chung MK, et al. (2013) 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Executive Summary. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 127: 529-555.
  5. Sobel M, Verhaeghe R; American College of Chest Physicians; American College of Chest Physicians (2008) Antithrombotic therapy for peripheral artery occlusive disease: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 133: 815S-843S.
  6. Sigler M, Jux C (2007) Biocompatibility of septal defect closure devices. Heart 93: 444-449.
  7. Otsuka F, Finn AV, Yazdani SK, Nakano M, Kolodgie FD, et al. (2012) The importance of the endothelium in atherothrombosis and coronary stenting. Nat Rev Cardiol 9: 439-453.
  8. Sigler M, Paul T, Grabitz RG (2005) Biocompatibility screening in cardiovascular implants. Z Kardiol 94: 383-391.
  9. Vogt MO, Kühn A, Hörer J, Schreiber C, Schneider H, et al. (2011) Clinical, echocardiographic and histopathologic findings in nine patients with surgically explanted ASD/PFO devices: do we know enough about the healing process in humans? Int J Cardiol 147: 398-404.
  10. Krumsdorf U, Ostermayer S, Billinger K, Trepels T, Zadan E, et al. (2004) Incidence and clinical course of thrombus formation on atrial septal defect and patient foramen ovale closure devices in 1,000 consecutive patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 43: 302-309.
  11. Stöllberger C, Finsterer J, Krexner E, Schneider B (2008) Stroke and peripheral embolism from an Amplatzer septal occluder 5 years after implantation. J Neurol 255: 1270-1271.
Citation: Sigler M (2013) Endothelialisation of Cardiovascular Implants–The Open Question. J Clin Exp Cardiolog 4:e125.

Copyright: © 2013 Sigler M. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top