Medicinal & Aromatic Plants

Medicinal & Aromatic Plants
Open Access

ISSN: 2167-0412

+44 1300 500008

Research Article - (2013) Volume 2, Issue 2

Essential Oil Composition of Five Endemic Hypericum Species from Turkey

E. Eroglu Özkan1*, B. Demirci2, Ç. Ünsal Gürer1, S. Kültür3, A. Mat1 and K.H.C. Baser4
1Department of Pharmacognosy, Istanbul University, 34112 Beyazit, Istanbul, Turkey
2Department of Pharmacognosy, Anadolu University, 26470 Eskisehir, Turkey
3Department of Pharmaceutical Botany, Istanbul University, 34112 Beyazit, Istanbul, Turkey
4Botany and Microbiology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, 1145 Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
*Corresponding Author: E. Eroglu Özkan, Department of Pharmacognosy, Istanbul University, 34112 Beyazit, Istanbul, Turkey Email:

Abstract

More than 465 Hypericum species exist on the Earth, widely spreading in Europe, Asia and North Africa. 42 of 80 species growing in Turkey are endemic. The chemical composition of the essential oils obtained from the aerial parts of the H. uniglandulosum Hausskn. ex Bornm., H. scabroides Robson & Poulter, H. kotschyanum Boiss., H. salsugineum Robson & Hub.-Mor. and H. thymopsis Boiss, five of the endemic species of Turkey by using the hydrodistillation method was identified by GC and GC/MS. The major components were identified as follows: 2,6-Dimethyl-3,5-heptadien-2-one (40.7%), nonacosane (3.2%), hexadecanoic acid (2.7%) and α-pinene (2.7%) in H. uniglandulosum; hexadecanoic acid (17.7%), spathulenol (5.3%), nonacosane (4.4%), dodecanoic acid (4.1%), baeckeol (4.1%) and γ-muurolene (3.9%) in H. scabroides; α-pinene (14.4%), nonacosane (11.1%), hexadecanoic acid (9.2%), β-pinene (8.7%), spathulenol (6.3%) and limonene (5.1%) in H. kotschyanum; nonacosane (42.7%), hexadecanoic acid (23.2%) and baeckeol (6.1%) in H. salsugineum; α-pinene (44.0%), baeckeol (32.9%), spathulenol (8.0%), limonene (7.6%) and camphene (5.2%) in H. thymopsis. Finally, the results are compared with each other. The differences between the results of the H. thymopsis and H. scabroides obtained in this study and the previous studies show that the chemical composition of the essential oils is different for the same species obtained at different locations. The essential oil composition of these species, except for the H. thymopsis and H. scabroides is identified for the first time

Keywords: Hypericum uniglandulosum; Hypericum scabroides; Hypericum kotschyanum; Hypericum salsugineum; Hypericum thymopsis; Hypericaceae; Essential oil composition

Introduction

The genus Hypericum (Hypericaceae) is represented by nearly 100 taxa grouped under 19 sections in Turkey. Among them, 45 taxa are endemic. In the traditional medicine of Turkey, the genus is known as “sari kantaron, kantaron, binbirdelik otu, mayasil otu” and most of them, especially H. perforatum, have been used for the treatment of burns, wounds, hemorroids, diarrhorea and ulcers [1-5].

Moreover, aqueous extracts prepared from the flowering aerial parts of the Hypericum species are being used in the treatment of psychological diseases such as neuralgia, anxiety, neurosis and depression [6]. The preparative forms of the Hypericum perforatum (St. John’s Wort) are sold for the treatment of mild to moderate depression in the USA and Europe. The chemical composition of some Hypericum species includes naphthodianthrones (especially hypericin and pseudohypericin), acylphloroglucinol derivatives (especially hyperforin and adhyperforin), flavonoids (especially quercetin, quercitrin, hyperoside and biapigenin), tannins, n-alkanes, xanthones and essential oil [7-9].

The essential oil compositions of about 50 different Hypericum species have so far been identified [10-13].

In this study, the oils of 5 endemic Hypericum species were obtained by hydro-distillation and analyzed by GC and GC/MS.

With the exception of H. thymopsis and H. scabroides the chemical composition of the essential oils of H. uniglandulosum, H. kotschyanum and H. salsugineum have not been reported to date [13,14].

The aim of this study was to investigate volatile constituents of five endemic Turkish Hypericum species, thus adding for the database of phytochemical knowledge for the genus. In addition to this, a comparison between the volatile oil composition of H. thymopsis and H. scabroides from different locations was performed.

Compounds were calculated automatically from peak areas of the total ion chromatogram (TIC). n-alkanes were used as reference points in the calculation of relative retention indexes (RRI). A library search was carried out using Wiley GC/MS Library, MassFinder, Adam’s Library [15,16] and in-house “Baser Library of Essential Oil Constituents” built up by genuine compounds and components of known oils, as well as MS literature data [17,18], was also used for the identification.

Material and Methods

Plant material

Flowering aerial parts of H. uniglandulosum were collected from east Anatolia, namely, Erzincan: Erzincan-Eski Çayirli road, 10 km to Eski Çayirli, 1450 m, 15.07.2006, that of H. scabroides were collected from east Anatolia, namely, Erzincan: Erzincan-Kelkit, 15 km to Kelkit, 1550 m, 14.07.2006, that of H. kotschyanum were collected from south Anatolia, namely, Içel: North-west of Arslanköy, 1840 m, 15.06.2006, that of H. salsugineum were collected from central Anatolia, namely, Konya: around The Salt Lake, on 01.07.2005, H. thymopsis were collected from central Anatolia, namely, Sivas: Sivas-Malatya road, Ziyaret Tepe, 1350 m, 10.07.2005. Specimens were identified and vouchers were deposited in the Herbarium of Istanbul University, Faculty of Pharmacy (Istanbul Üniversitesi Eczacilik Fakültesi Herbaryumu, Istanbul, Turkey) under code numbers of ISTE 85344, ISTE 85343, ISTE 83979, ISTE 85341 and ISTE 85342, respectively.

Isolation of the essential oil

Air dried and powdered plant materials were subjected to hydrodistillation in a Clevenger-type apparatus according to the method recommended in the European Pharmacopoeia [19]. The oils obtained were stored at +4°C until analyzed.

Gas chromatography (GC)

The GC analysis was carried out using an Agilent 6890N GC system. FID detector temperature was 300°C. To obtain the same elution order with GC-MS, simultaneous auto-injection was done on a duplicate of the same column applying the same operational conditions. Relative percentage amounts of the separated compounds were calculated from FID chromatograms. The analysis results are given in table 1.

Compound RRI UN SB KC SG TP
α-pinene 1032 2.7 3.1 14.4 - 44.0
Camphene 1076 - - 0.5 - 5.2
Undecane 1100 1.9 0.3 0.1 tr -
β-pinene 1118 - - 8.7 - 1.7
Limonene 1203 0.2 1.0 5.1 - 7.6
γ-terpinene 1255 - - 0.7 - -
p-cymene 1280 - 0.3 1.5 - -
6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one 1348 0.9 - - - -
2,6 Dimethyl-3,5 heptadien-2-one* 1377 40.7 - - - -
Nonanal 1400 0.1 - - - -
trans-linalool oxide (furanoid) 1450 - - - 0.2 -
cis-linalool oxide (furanoid) 1478 0.9 - - 0.1 -
Bicycloelemene 1495 - - - 0.7 -
α-copaene 1497 0.1 0.5 0.6 0.3 -
α-campholene aldehyde 1499 0.2 0.2 0.6 - -
β-bourbonene 1535 - - - 0.3 -
Linalool 1553 1.2 - - 0.1 -
Pinocarvone 1586 - - 0.3 - -
Fenchylalcohol 1591 - - 0.5 - -
β-ylangene 1589 - - - 0.3 -
β-copaene 1597 - - - 0.5 -
β-elemene 1600 - - - 0.3 -
β-caryophyllene 1612 - - - 0.2 -
Aromadendrene 1628 0.1 1.2 - 0.3 -
Myrtenal 1648 0.2 - 0.7 - -
(E)-2-Decenal 1655 - - - 0.1 -
γ-Gurjunene 1659 - - - 0.1 -
Alloaroma dendrene 1661 - - - 0.1 -
trans-pinocarveol 1670 - - 1.0 - -
Acetophenone 1671 - 1.5 - - -
trans- Verbenol 1683 0.2 - 0.4 - -
Drima-7,9(11)-diene 1694 tr - - - -
γ-Muurolene 1704 1.0 3.9 1.8 0.4 -
Borneol 1719 0.2 - 0.3 0.1 tr
Verbenone 1725 0.3 0.8 - 0.2 -
Germacrene-D 1726 - - 0.9 1.4 tr
Valencene 1740 0.2 - - - -
α-Muurolene 1740 0.2 0.8 0.3 0.2 -
Geranial 1740 0.1 - - - -
Carvone 1751 0.1 - - - -
Bicyclogermacrene 1755 - - - 1.0 -
Decanol 1766 - - 0.3 - -
δ-Cadinene 1773 tr 1.6 0.6 0.4 tr
γ-Cadinene 1776 0.4 2.2 0.6 0.3 tr
Myrtenol 1804 0.2 - 0.4 - -
Methyl dodecanoate 1815 - - - 0.2 -
Trans-carveol 1845 0.3 0.9 0.3 - -
Calamenene 1849 1.0 1.8 0.9 0.3 -
Geraniol 1857 1.0 - - - -
(E)-Geranyl acetone 1868 0.2 - 0.4 0.1 -
α-calacorene 1941 0.1 1.2 0.6 - -
1,5-Epoxysalvial-4(14)-ene 1945 - - 1.0 - -
(E)-β-Ionone 1958 0.1 - - - -
1-Dodecanol 1973 0.5 - - 1.5 -
Eicosane 2000 0.1 - - - -
Caryophyllene oxide 2008 0.3 1.7 1.3 0.1 -
Salvial-4(14)-en-1-one 2037 0.6 - - tr -
1-Tridecanol 2077 - - - 0.2 -
Octanoic acid 2084 0.1 1.0 - - -
Globulol 2098 0.2 - - - -
Heneicosane 2100 - - - 0.2 -
Viridiflorol 2104 - - - 0.2 -
 
             
Hexahydrofarnesyl acetone 2131 0.6 1.4 0.8 1.1 tr
Spathulenol 2144 1.5 5.3 6.3 - 8.0
1-Tetradecanol 2179 0.3 - - 0.5 -
T-cadinol 2187 - tr - - -
Nonanoic acid 2192 0.3 2.2 - - -
Docosane 2200 0.1 - - - -
T-Muurolol 2209 0.2 - - 0.1 -
Methyl hexadecanoate 2226 0.1 - - 0.2 -
Carvacrol 2239 - - 2.4 - -
α-cadinol 2255 0.3 1.8 0.8 0.2 tr
Cadalene 2256 0.4 3.0 0.8 0.2 0.5
Ethyl hexadecanoate 2262 0.2 - - - -
Decanoic acid 2298 0.6 - - - -
Tricosane 2300 0.9 0.6 0.8 0.6 -
Eudesma-4(15),7-dien-1β-ol 2369 - - 0.9 0.7 tr
1-Hexadecanol 2384 - - - 0.1 -
Undecanoic acid 2400 0.2 - - - -
Tetracosane 2400 - - - 0.4 -
Pentacosane 2500 0.2 2.6 3.9 1.9 -
Dodecanoic acid 2503 2.3 4.1 3.0 0.1 tr
Hexacosane 2600 - - - 0.2 -
Phytol 2622 - - tr 0.7 -
Benzyl benzoate 2655 0.1 - 1.8 - -
Baeckeol 2668 0.9 4.1 2.4 6.1 32.9
Tetradecanoic acid 2670 0.8 2.9 2.4 2.5 -
Heptacosane 2700 0.1 1.2 1.0 2.2 -
Octacosane 2800 - - - 1.3 -
Pentadecanoic acid 2822 - - - 1.2 -
Nonacosane 2900 3.2 4.4 11.1 42.7 tr
Hexadecanoic acid 2931 2.7 17.7 9.2 23.2 tr
Total   72.7 75.3 92.4 96.9 99.9
UN: H. uniglandulosum; SB: H. scabroides; KC: H. kotschyanum; SG: H. salsugineum; TP: H. thymopsis
RRI: Relative retention indices calculated against n-alkanes
% calculated from FID data
tr: Trace (<0.1%)
* tentative identification

Table 1: Percentage of volatiles of 5 endemic Hypericum species.

Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS)

The GC/MS analysis was carried out with an Agilent 5975 GC-MSD system. Innowax FSC column (60 m×0.25 mm, 0.25 μm film thickness) was used with helium as carrier gas (0.8 mL/min). GC oven temperature was kept at 60°C for 10 min and programmed to 220°C at a rate of 4°C/min and kept constant at 220°C for 10 min and then programmed to 240°C at a rate of 1°C/min. Injection volume was 1 μL (10%) in hexane. Split ratio was adjusted at 40:1. The injector temperature was set at 250°C. Mass spectra were recorded at 70 eV. Mass range was from m/z 35 to 450. Relative percentage amounts of the separated compounds were calculated automatically from peak areas of the total ion chromatogram (TIC). n-Alkanes were used as reference points in the calculation of relative retention indexes (RRI). A library search was carried out using Wiley GC/MS Library, MassFinder, Adam’s Library [15,16] and in-house “Baser Library of Essential Oil Constituents” built up by genuine compounds and components of known oils, as well as MS literature data [17,18], was also used for the identification.

Results and Discussion

Volatile oils were obtained from the aerial parts of the H. uniglandulosum, H. scabroides, H. kotschyanum, H. salsugineum and H. thymopsis with yields of 0.67% (v/w), trace (in hexane), 0.67% (v/w), trace (in hexane), 0.67% (v/w), respectively. The analyses were performed and are given in table 1.

Fifty-eight constituents corresponding to the 72.7% of the oil from the H. uniglandulosum, thirty-two constituents corresponding to the 75.3% of the oil from H. scabroides, forty-five constituents corresponding to the 92.4% of the oil from the H. kotschyanum, fiftyfour constituents corresponding to the 96.9% of the oil from the H. salsugineum, seventeen constituents corresponding to the 99.9% of the oil from the H. thymopsis were identified.

2,6-Dimethyl-3,5-heptadien-2-one (40.7%), nonacosane (3.2%), hexadecanoic acid (2.7%) and α-pinene (2.7%) were characterized as the main components of the H. uniglandulosum. Hexadecanoic acid (17.7%), spathulenol (5.3%), nonacosane (4.4%), dodecanoic acid (4.1%), baeckeol (4.1%) and γ-muurolene (3.9%) were characterized as the main components of the H. scabroides (SB). α-pinene (14.4%), nonacosane (11.1%), hexadecanoic acid (9.2%), β-pinene (8.7%), spathulenol (6.3%) and limonene (5.1%) were characterized as the main components of the H. kotschyanum. Nonacosane (42.7%), hexadecanoic acid (23.2%) and baeckeol (6.1%) were characterized as the main components of the H. salsugineum. α-pinene (44.0%), baeckeol (32.9%), spathulenol (8.0%), limonene (7.6%) and camphene (5.2%) were characterized as the main components of the H. thymopsis. The chemical class distribution of the volatile oils of 5 different species is given in table 2.

Chemical Class UN
(#/%)
SB
(#/%)
KC
(#/%)
SG
(#/%)
TP
(#/%)
Monoterpene Hydrocarbons 2 / 2.9 3 / 4.4 6 / 30.9 - 4 / 58.5
Oxygenated Monoterpenes 12 / 4.3 4 / 5.0 11 / 7.5 6 / 0.7 2 / Tr
Sesquiterpene Hydrocarbons 11 / 3.5 9 / 16.2 9 / 7.1 17 / 7.3 4 / 0.5
Oxygenated Sesquiterpenes 6 / 3.0 4 / 7.2 5 / 10.1 5 / 1.1 2 / 8.0
Alkanes+Alkenes 7 / 6.5 5 / 9.1 5 / 16.9 9 / 49.5 1 / Tr
Fatty acids 8 / 7.9 5 / 27.9 3 / 14.6 6 / 27.3 2 / Tr
Others 12 / 44.6 2 / 5.5 5 / 5.3 11 / 11.0 2 / 32.9
Total 58 / 72.7 32 / 75.3 45 / 92.4 54 / 96.9 17 / 99.9
UN: H. uniglandulosum; SB: H. scabroides; KC: H. kotschyanum; SG: H. salsugineum; TP: H. thymopsis
#: number of compound
% relative percentage

Table 2: The chemical class distribution of the oil components of 5 endemic Hypericum species.

It has been observed that, the oil of H. uniglandulosum was rich in terms of carbonylic compounds and fatty acids. The oil of H. scabroides was rich in terms of sesquiterpene hydrocarbons and fatty acids. The oil of H. kotschyanum, on the other hand, was dominated by monoterpene hydrocarbons, alkanes, oxygenated sesquiterpene hydrocarbons and fatty acids. The oil of H. salsugineum contained alkanes and fatty acids. The oil of H. thymopsis was found to be rich in monoterpene hydrocarbons and a phenolic-compound.

As a result of this research α-pinene-2,6-dimethyl-3,5-heptadien- 2-one, baeckeol, nonacosane and hexadecanoic acid were identified as major volatile constituents ( >10%) in Hypericum species.

Comparing the main constituent of the H. uniglandulosum oil to the other studies, the following are observed: 2,6-Dimethyl-3,5-heptadien- 2-one was found to be the major component only in H. tetrapterum from Serbia [20].

Hexadecanoic acid and spathulenol were detected in high amount in H. scabroides in this study, however, the δ-3-carene and sabinene were reported as the main constituents of the H. scabroides collected from different location [14].

Nonacosane was found to be the major component only in two species, namely H. salsugineum and H. davisii [21].

It was observed that α-pinene was found to be the main component in H. kotschyanum and H. thymopsis. Among the previous studies about Hypericum essential oils from Turkey, many taxa were characterized by the high amount of α-pinene [11,20,22-30], namely H. calycinum, H. cerastoides, H. montbretii, H. scabrum, H. perforatum [10,31], H. hyssopifolium subsp. elongatum var. elongatum, H. capitatum var. capitatum, H. aviculariifolium subsp. depilatum var. depilatum and H. apricum [21].

α-pinene, baeckeol, limonene and spathulenol were identified as major components in H. thymopsis, although baeckeol and limonene were not determined in a previous study. α-pinene, germacrene D, δ-cadinene, γ-cadinene, spathulenol, α-cadinol, eudesma-4(15),7- dien-1β-ol, nonacosane and hexadecanoic acid were identified both in this study and the previous one [13].

Essential oil compositions of species show difference in the sense of collecting regions and dates. Chemical profiling using volatiles may be useful in taxonomical classifications.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Tuba Kiyan for her assistance.

References

  1. Baytop T (1999) Türkiye’de Bitkilerle Tedavi. (2ndedn), Nobel Tip Kitabevi, Istanbul, Turkey.
  2. Honda G, Yesilada E, Tabata M, Sezik E, Fujita T, et al. (1996) Traditional medicine in Turkey. VI. Folk medicine in west Anatolia: Afyon, Kütahya, Denizli, Mugla, Aydin provinces. J Ethnopharmacol 53: 75-87.
  3. Tuzlaci E, Eryasar Aymaz P (2001) Turkish folk medicinal plants, Part IV: Gönen (Balikesir). Fitoterapia 72: 323-343.
  4. Sezik E, Yesilada E, Honda G, Takaishi Y, Takeda Y, et al. (2001) Traditional medicine in Turkey X. Folk medicine in Central Anatolia. J Ethnopharmacol 75: 95-115.
  5. Kultur S (2007) Medicinal plants used in Kirklareli Province (Turkey). J Ethnopharmacol. 111: 341-364.
  6. Blumenthal M, Goldberg A, Brinckmann J (2000) Integrative Medicine Communications. Herbal Medicine Newton 359-366.
  7. Bombardelli E, Morazzoni P (1995) Hypericum perforatum. Fitoterapia 66: 43-68.
  8. Bruneton J (1995) Pharmacognosy, Phytochemistry, Medicinal Plants. Lavoisier Publishing, Paris 367-370.
  9. Di Carlo G, Borrelli F, Ernst E, Izzo AA (2001) St. John’s wort: Prozac from the plant kingdom. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 22: 292-297.
  10. Erken S, Malyer H, Demirci F, Baser KHC (2001) Chemical Investigations On Some Hypericum Species Growing in Turkey-I. Chemistry of Natural Compounds 37: 434-438.
  11. Demirci B, Baser KHC, Crockett SL, Khan IA (2005) Analyses of the Volatile Constituents of Asian Hypericum L. (Clucsiaceae, Hypericoideae) Species. J Essent Oil Res 17: 659-663.
  12. Crockett SL, Demirci B, Baser KHC, Khan IA (2007b) Volatile Constituents of Hypericum L. Section Myriandra (Clusiaceae): Species of the H. fasciculatum Lam. Alliance. Journal of Essential Oil Research 20: 244-249.
  13. Gençler Özkan AM, Demirci B, Baser KHC (2009) Essential Oil Composition of Hypericum thymopsis Boiss. Journal of Essential Oil Research 21: 149-153.
  14. Bagci E, Bekçi F, (2010) Variation in essential oil composition of Hypericum scabrum L. and H. scabroides N. Robson & Poulter (Hypericaceae) aerial parts during its phenological cycle. Acta Bot Gallica 157: 247-254.
  15. McLafferty FW, Stauffer DB, Einar S, Heller SR (1989) The Wiley/NBS Registry of Mass Spectral Data. J Wiley and Sons, New York.
  16. Koenig WA, Joulain D, Hochmuth DH (2004) Terpenoids and Related Constituents of Essential Oils. MassFinder 3, Edit., D.H. Hochmuth (edn), Convenient and Rapid Analysis of GC/MS, incorporating W.A. Hamburg, Germany.
  17. Joulain D, Koenig WA (1998) The Atlas of Spectra Data of Sesquiterpene Hydrocarbons. E.B. Verlag, Hamburg, Germany.
  18. ESO 2000 (1999) The Complete Database of Essential Oils, Boelens Aroma Chemical Information Service. The Netherlands.
  19. European Pharmacopoeia (2005) Council of Europe. (5thedn), Strasbourg, France 1: 217.
  20. Smelcerovic A, Spiteller M, Ligon AP, Smelcerovic Z, Raabe N (2007) Essential Oil Composition of Hypericum L. Species from Southeastern Serbia and their Chemotaxonomy. Biochem Syst Ecol 35: 99-113.
  21. Bagci, E, Yüce E (2010) Essential Oils of the Aerial Parts of Hypericum apricum Kar. and Kir. and Hypericum davisii Robson (Guttiferae) Species from Turkey. Asian J Chem 22: 7405-7409.
  22. Baser KHC, Özek T, Nuriddinov HR, Demirci AB (2002) Essential Oils of Two Hypericum Species from Uzbekistan. Chemistry of Natural Compounds 38: 54-57.
  23. Coudalis M, Baziou P, Petrakis PV, Harvala C (2001) Essential oil Composition of Hypericum perforatum L. Growing Different Locations in Greece. Flavour Fragr J 16: 204-206.
  24. Sajjadi SE, Rahiminezhad MR, Mehregan I, Poorassar A (2001) Constituents of Essential Oil of Hypericum dogonbadanicum Assadi. J Essent Oil Res 13: 43-44.
  25. Couladis M, Chinou IB, Tzakou O, Petrakis PV (2003) Composition and Antimicrobial Activity of the Essential Oil of Hypericum rumeliacum subsp. apollinis (Boiss. & Heldr.) Phytotherapy Research 17: 152-154.
  26. Petrakis PV, Couladis M, Roussis V (2005) A Method for Detecting the Biosystematic Significance of the Essential Oil Composition: The Case of Fice Hellenic Hypericum L. Species. Biochem Syst Ecol 33: 873-898.
  27. Pavlovic M, Tzakou O, Petrakis PV, Coudalis M (2006) The Essential Oil of Hypericum perforatum L., Hypericum tetrapterum Fries and Hypericum olympicum L. Growing in Greece. Flavour Fragr J 21: 84-87.
  28. Saroglou V, Marin PD, Rancic A, Veljic M, Skaltsa H (2007) Composition and Antimicrobial Activity of the Essential Oil Six Hypericum Species from Serbia. Biochem Syst Ecol 35: 146-152.
  29. Crockett S, Demirci B, Baser KHC, Khan IA (2007a) Analysis of the Volatile Constituents of Five African and Mediterranean Hypericum L. (Clucsiaceae, Hypericoideae) Species. J Essent Oil Res 19: 302-306.
  30. Crockett S, Demirci B, Baser KHC, Khan IA (2007b) Volatile Constituents of Hypericum L. Section Myriandra (Clusiaceae): Species of the H. fasciculatum Lam. Alliance J Essent Oil Res 20: 244-249.
  31. Çakir A, Duru ME, Harmandar M, Criminna R, Passannati S, et al. (1997) Comparison of the Volatile Oils of Hypericum scabrum L. and Hypericum perforatum L. From Turkey. Flavour Fragr J 12: 285-287.
Citation: Özkan EE, Demirci B, Gürer çü, Kültür S, Mat A, et al. (2013) Essential Oil Composition of Five Endemic Hypericum Species from Turkey. Med Aromat Plants 2:121.

Copyright: © 2012 Özkan EE, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top