Journal of Bone Research
Open Access

Euroqol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Health-Related Quality of Life and Orthopedic Surgery

Nora Beatriz Calcaterra^{* *}Correspondence: Nora Beatriz Calcaterra, Department of Biology, National University of Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina, Email:

Author info »

Description

In the world, musculoskeletal problems, which impact hundreds of millions of individuals, are the primary cause of severe, chronic pain and impairment. They are among the top 10 causes of Disability-Adjusted Life-Years (DALY) in Europe and the primary cause of disability in older age groups (WHO 2006). The World Health Organization has acknowledged this and supported the Bone and Joint Decade (2000-2010). In highincome nations, osteoarthritis ranks sixth in terms of Years Lived with Disability (YLD). 114,000 individuals in the UK received a main hip or knee joint replacement procedure in 2007. According to prevalence data from Sweden for the same year, 1 in 15 elderly women underwent knee replacement surgery. To lessen the burden and expense of musculoskeletal problems on individuals, healthcare providers, and society at large has been one of the main objectives of the Bone and Joint Decade. It is now appropriate to consider how orthopedic surgery has turned out as we approach the end of the decade.

One of the main objectives of orthopedic surgery is to enhance Health-Related Quality Of Life (HRQOL). There are numerous tools for measuring HRQOL. The generic tools among them are applicable to a range of patient populations, regardless of the underlying illness or disability. EQ-5D (EuroQol), SF-6D (derived from RAND-36/SF-36), HUI (Health Utilities Index Mark II/Mark III), and AQoL (Assessment of Quality of Life) are some examples of generic instruments. The instrument most frequently used is the SF-36. The majority of studies have focused on particular orthopedic procedures, and they all demonstrate improved HRQOL following surgery. Using HRQOL, the impact of surgical procedures has been assessed. Different elective orthopedic surgical treatments' outcomes have been compared. In order to estimate the success of orthopedic healthcare, generic techniques have also been utilised. In order to estimate the success of orthopedic healthcare, generic techniques have also been utilised. The generic EQ-5D instrument for measuring health-related quality of life allows for both the description of health status along 5 dimensions and the assessment of health or the estimate of a health summary score: The EQ-5D score is on a scale where 0 is death and 1 is complete health. More than ten nations have used the tool in demographic surveys. In clinical trials and research evaluating various orthopedic therapies, HRQOL and health status indicators are frequently used as outcomes.

The EQ-5D is brief, simple to use, and responsive, meaning it can identify changes that are clinically significant. Additionally, it enables the combining of several health variables to produce the EQ-5D index score, which is needed for healthcare evaluations and for the production of Quality-Adjusted Life-Years (QALYs), a metric widely employed in cost-effectiveness analyses.

Data on health-related quality of life were gathered from the EQ-5D, a patient questionnaire that they self-administered. The EQ-5D respondents categorize their own health state into five categories, each with three severity levels: Mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression (no problems, moderate problems, or severe problems). In a sizable UK population, the Time Trade-Off (TTO) approach is employed to rate these various health states (UK EQ-5D index tariff). The only Swedish population survey to evaluate the EQ-5D used the UK tariff, and there is no Swedish TTO tariff for EQ-5D health statuses.

There may be restrictions with the EQ-5D tool. It might not be responsive to subtle but crucial clinical changes in health. In the patient subgroups who underwent surgery for foot, shoulder, and elbow issues. One must take into account the absence of Minimal Important Differences (MID) for this group. In assessing the results of orthopedic surgery, it is also critical to include condition-specific equipment.