Medicinal & Aromatic Plants

Medicinal & Aromatic Plants
Open Access

ISSN: 2167-0412

+44 1300 500008

Conference Proceeding - (2016) Volume 5, Issue 1

Evaluation of Antimicrobial, Antioxidant and Cytotoxic Activity of Lovoa trichiliodes Extracts and Essential Oils

Opawale BO1*, Onifade AK2 and Ogundare AO2
1Department of Science Laboratory Technology, Rufus Giwa Polytechnic, Owo, Ondo State, Nigeria
2Department of Microbiology, Federal University of Technology, P.M.B. 704, Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria
*Corresponding Author: Opawale BO, Department of Science Laboratory Technology, Rufus Giwa Polytechnic, Owo, Ondo State, Nigeria, Tel: 2348035925955 Email:

Abstract

Lovoa trichiliodes is a medicinal plant used in many African countries by traditional practitioners for the treatment of some infectious diseases. The extracts and essential oils from the leaves and stem bark of Lovoa trichiliodes were investigated for their antioxidant, antimicrobial and cytotoxic properties using standard techniques. The 2, 2-diphenyl- 1-picryl-hydrazyl scavenging activity ranged from 03.33 ± 0.03% at 0.05 mg/ml of acetone stem bark extracts to 88.14 ± 0.03% at 2.0 mg/ml of stem bark essential oil. The IC50 ranged from 0.81 ± 0.15 to 1.65 ± 0.03 for the extracts and essential oils. However, the IC50 of the leaf extract (1.65 ± 0.03) and that of the leaf oil (1.52 ± 0.03) were significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher than that of ascorbic acid (0.40 ± 0.15) used as control. The antimicrobial assay of the samples revealed a high activity against both the typed and clinical isolates of test pathogens at 50 mg/ml for extracts and 50 µg/ml for oil respectively. The leaf extract showed lower level of activity than the stem bark extract against the test organisms compared to the controls. The essential oils from both the leaf and stem bark exhibited higher activities against bacteria than fungi. Bacillus subtilis showed the highest susceptibility to the extracts while Pseudomonas aeruginosa exhibited the least susceptibility to the plant materials. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal/fungicidal concentration (MBC/MFC) ranged from 2.5 to 200 mg/ml and 5 to 50 mg/ml for the extracts while that of oils ranged from 3 to 40 µg/ml and 5 to 75 µg/ml respectively. All the extracts and essential oils showed high level of lethality on brine shrimp larva with LC50 ranging from 0.71 to 52.65 ppm. These results confirm the basis for the use of this plant in traditional medicine as remedy against several diseases and prospect for antibiotic drug development for the treatment of ailments caused by the test pathogens.

Keywords: Lovoa trichiliodes; Essential oils; Antimicrobial assay; Traditional medicine; Infectious diseases

Introduction

The folkloric concepts of a wide range of medicinal plants have been proven scientifically and had led to the development of drugs to fight various infectious diseases [1]. Plant extracts and essential oils have been widely explored for their therapeutic activities against most microbial infections. It has been established that about 80% of the world’s population relies on plant derived medicines for their healthcare needs and 3.5 billion people in the world depend on the exploitation medicinal plants and herbal products around them for their health needs [2]. These extracts and essential oils contain a variety of volatile molecules such as terpenes, terpenoids and phenols derived from aromatic and aliphatic compounds which might have antibacterial, antiviral and fungicidal consequences [3]. There has been an increasing interest in the radical scavenging activities of some natural antioxidants, especially those found in medicinal plants, which may play a role in preventing various chronic diseases [4]. There is also increasing need to search for new compounds with cytotoxic activity as the treatment of cancer with the available anticancer drugs is often unsatisfactory due to the problem of toxicity to the normal cells.

Lovoa trichiliodes is a species of plant in the Meliaceae family. It is common in West Africa and it is a large forest tree that could grow up to 40 m high with a dark heavy crown. It is used in traditional medicine for the treatment of many microbial infections. Based on the ethno medical information on the plant, the present study was aimed at demonstrating the antimicrobial activity of the extracts and essential oils from the plant materials against some human pathogens and to evaluate their potential antioxidant and cytotoxic activities.

Materials and Methods

Collection of plants and extraction procedure

Fresh leaves and stem bark of Lovoa trichiliodes Harm. were harvested from uncultivated farmlands located in Owo, Ondo State, South-Western Nigeria in May, 2011. The plant materials were then authenticated at the Herbarium of the Department of Botany, University of Lagos and voucher specimens (LVH3699) were deposited at the Department of Forestry and Wood Technology, Federal University of Technology, Akure. The authenticated plant materials were washed and cleaned thoroughly with tap water and then air-dried under shade. The dried samples were then ground into coarse powder with the aid of a mechanical grinder and were stored in clean air-tight containers, and kept in a cool, dry place until required for use.

The powdered sample (100 g) was soaked in 300 ml acetone for 72 hr with intermittent stirring using sterile spatula. The plant extracts were then filtered through Whatman No1. filter paper into bijou bottles and then dried using rotary evaporator at a temperature of 50°C to yield crude extracts [5]. Different concentrations of the extracts were prepared by diluting 0.10 g, 0.20 g, 0.30 g, 0.40 g and 0.50 g of the extracts in 100 ml of 0.01% Tween-20 to obtain concentrations of 10 mg/ml, 20 mg/ml, 30 mg/ml, 40 mg/ml and 50 mg/ml respectively [6].

A 500 g portion of the respective plant parts in 2000 ml of distilled water was hydro distilled using Clevenger type of apparatus for 5 hr to obtain the oil. The steam distillate was dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate and 10 mg of it was diluted with 100 ml of 0.01% Tween-20 to obtain a 100 μg/ml solution. Serial dilution of each 100 ml stock solution was made with 0.01% Tween-20 to give test solutions 50, 25, 12.5 and 6.3 μg/ml respectively [7,8].

Test microorganisms

The microorganisms employed in the study were fifteen clinical isolates (Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, Klebsiella pneumonia, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella typhi, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus spp, Streptococcus pyogenes, Aspergillus flavus, Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, Cryptococcus neoformans and Trichophyton rubrum) and five typed cultures ( Bacillus substilis ATCC 6633, Stapylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Salmonella typhi ATCC 6539 and Candida albicans ATCC 10231) obtained from Federal Medical Center, Owo and Federal Institute of Industrial Research, Oshodi, Lagos State, Nigeria respectively.

In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility test

The extracts and essential oils obtained from the test plants were screened against the test organisms by agar well diffusion method [9]. A 25 ml aliquot of Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA, Lab Oratorios Britania, Argentinia) and Saboraud Dextrose agar (SDA) was poured into each Petri plate. When the agar solidified, test organisms were inoculated on the surface of the plates (1×106 cfu/ml and 1 x 106 sfu/ml for bacteria and fungi respectively) using a sterile glass spreader, allowed to set and punched with 6 mm cork borer. A portion of 50 μl of each of the extract concentrations was introduced into the wells. Control wells containing the same volume of 30% Dimethyl sulphoside (DMSO) served as negative control, while Chloramphenicol (100 μl) and Miconazole (100 μl) were used as positive controls for bacterial and fungal plates respectively. The tests were carried out in triplicates. Bacterial plates were incubated at 37°C while fungal plates were incubated at 25°C for 24 h and 72 h respectively. The diameters of the zones of inhibition were then measured in millimeters.

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and Minimum bactericidal/fungicidal concentrations (MBC/MFC)

Two-fold serial dilutions of the extracts were prepared in Mueller- Hilton broth and Saboraud broth for bacteria and fungi respectively to achieve a decreasing concentrations ranging from the least concentration that produced clear zone of inhibition (10 mg/ml to 0.156 mg/ml). All tubes including the controls were labeled accordingly. Each dilution was seeded with 1 ml of standardized inoculums (1.0 × 106 cfu/ml for bacteria and 1.0 × 106 sfu/ml for fungi) incubated at 37°C for 24 hr and 25°C for 72 hr for bacteria and fungi respectively. A tube containing only seeded broth (i.e. without plant extracts) was used as the positive control while the un-inoculated tube was used as negative control. The lowest concentration of each oil sample that showed a clear zone of inhibition was when compared with the controls was considered as the MIC. The minimum bactericidal/fungicidal concentration (MBC/ MFC) was determined by inoculating 1 ml aliquot of the MIC tube culture on antibiotic free Muller Hinton Agar and Saboraud Dextrose Agar plates and incubated at 37°C for 24 hr for bacteria and 25°C for 72 hr for fungi. The lowest concentration of the extracts at which there was no observable growth was taken as the MBC/MFC.

DPPH free radicals scavenging assay

The DPPH free radical (2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) scavenging assay was determined using the method described by Koto-Nyiwa et al. [10]. A 4 mg portion of DPPH was dissolved in methanol to get 100 μM methanol solution of DPPH. A 3 ml portion of the extract concentrations (0.00 to 2.0 mg/ml) was added to 1 ml of 100 μM methanol solution of DPPH. The mixture was shaken vigorously and incubated in the dark at room temperature for 30 min. The absorbance at 517 nm was measured against the blank (methanol) and ascorbic acid as positive control using a spectrophotometer. The DPPH radical scavenging activity (%) was then determined by the following equation:

DPPH radical scavenging: Activity (%)=[(Ao −As) /Ao] × 100 where Ao=absorbance of DPPH without sample; As=absorbance of mixture of sample and DPPH. The radical scavenging activity of the samples (Median inhibitory concentration, IC50) value was determined from an equation line obtained by plotting a graph of concentration against percentage inhibition.

Determination of cytotoxic effect of plant extracts

The brine shrimp (Artemia salina) lethality bioassay was carried out according to the method described by Hag et al. [11]. Brine shrimp eggs were hatched in artificial sea water prepared by dissolving 38 g of salt in 1 liter of distilled water, filtered and put in shallow rectangular dish. A plastic divider with several holes of 2 mm size was clamped in the dish to make two equal compartments. Brine shrimp eggs were placed in one side of the compartment while the other compartment was illuminated. After 48 h of illumination, phototrophic nauplii (Brine shrimp larvae) were collected by using pipette from the lightened side. Samples were then prepared by dissolving 20 mg each of the extracts and essential oils respectively in 2 mls of DMSO from where further diluted concentrations of 1000, 100, 10 and 1 ppm were prepared. A 4 ml portion of the artificial sea water was added into each test tube and 20 shrimps were transferred into it. This was followed by the addition of 1 ml of each of the test extracts and essential oils of previously prepared concentrations and maintained under illumination at room temperature. Survivors were counted with the aid of magnifying glass after 24 h. The percentage mortality was calculated using Abbot’s formula and the LC50 was also determined [12,13].

Data analysis

Data were presented as mean ± standard error (SE). Significance difference between different groups was tested using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and treatment means were compared with Duncan’s New Multiple Range Test (DNMRT) using SSPS window 7 version17.0 software. The significance was determined at the level of p ≤ 0.05.

Results and Discussion

Extracts and essential oils derived from medicinal plants are potential sources of novel antimicrobial compounds especially against pathogenic organisms. The results of the in vitro antimicrobial studies in this work showed that the acetone extracts (Tables 1 and 2) and essential oils (Tables 3 and 4) of L. trichiliodes leaf and stem bark significantly (p ≤ 0.05) inhibited the growth of most of the test pathogens. The results revealed that the plant extracts and essential oils exhibited strong activity against the selected pathogens with varying magnitude. The acetone extracts showed the inhibition zones range of: leaf (12.00 ± 0.00-17.00 ± 0.58), stem bark (10.67 ± 0.58-22.33 ± 0.33) while the essential oils revealed: leaf (5.33 ± 0.33-18.00 ± 0.58) and stem bark (6.00 ± 0.58- 20.33 ± 0.88) with the reference antibiotic standards ranging from: Chloramphenicol (10.00 ± 0.58-17.33 ± 0.33) and Myconazole (10.00 ± 0.58-14.33 ± 0.33) at 50 mg/ml and 50 μg/ml for the extracts and essential oils respectively. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) obtained in the double broth dilution of the extracts and essential oils of the plant materials against all the test pathogens are shown in Tables 5 and 6 respectively. The results showed that all the extracts and oils have significant antimicrobial activity against most of the tested microbial strains in the ranges 2.5-200 mg/ml and 3.0-60 μg/ml for the extracts and essential oils respectively. This significant activity may be due to the presence of monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes as reported in the work of Soroglou et al. [14]. The pathogens: Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus were the most sensitive strains while Salmonella typhi, Streptococcus pyogenes, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus species, Cryptococcus neoformans and Trichophyton rubrum were insensitive to the extracts and essential oils. The extracts and essential oils had more significant (p ≤ 0.05) antibacterial activity than those of fungi. The susceptible pathogens were even more sensitive to the plant materials than the reference antibiotics. The results corroborate the reported antimicrobial activity of some members of the Meliaceae and the plant may serve as good source of cheap and highly effective antimicrobial agents for bacterial infections caused by multi-resistant organisms.

Conc. (mg/ml) Organisms 10 20 30 40 50 DMSO Chl(100µg/ml) Myz(100µg/ml)
B. S NI 7.67 ± 0.58a 10.67 ± 0.58b 13.67 ± 0.58c 15.33 ± 0.58d NI 11.00 ± 0.00b N.A
B. S ATCC6633 NI 8.33 ± 0.33a 11.33 ± 0.33b 14.33 ± 0.33c 15.67 ± 0.33d NI 13.33 ± 0.33c N.A
S. A 5.67 ± 0.58a 9.00 ± 0.00b 11.00 ± 0.00c 12.67 ± 0.58d 15.00 ± 0.00e NI 20.00 ± 0.00f N.A
S. A ATCC25923 6.33 ± 0.33a 9.33 ± 0.33b 11.33 ± 0.33c 13.33 ± 0.88d 15.33 ± 0.33e NI 22.33 ± 0.33f N.A
S. E 4.33 ± 0.58a 7.33 ± 0.58b 10.67 ± 0.58c 13.33 ± 0.58d 15.00 ± 0.00e NI 11.00 ± 0.00c N.A
E. C NI 6.33 ± 0.58a 9.33 ± 0.58b 12.67 ± 0.58c 14.33 ± 0.58d NI 14.00 ± 0.00d N.A
E. C ATCC25922 NI 7.33 ± 0.33a 9.67 ± 0.67b 13.67 ± 0.33c 14.67 ± 0.33c NI 16.00 ± 0.58d N.A
Ps. A NI 5.33 ± 0.58a 8.33 ± 0.58b 11.33 ± 0.58c 13.67 ± 0.58d NI 12.00 ± 0.00c N.A
A. f 3.67 ± 0.58a 6.33 ± 0.58b 11.67 ± 0.58c 12.00 ± 0.00c 12.00 ± 0.00c NI N.A 17.33 ± 0.58d
C. A 7.67 ± 0.58a 11.33 ± 0.58b 13.67 ± 0.58c 15.67 ± 0.58d 16.00 ± 0.00d NI N.A 12.00 ± 0.00bc
C. A ATCC10231 8.33 ± 0.33a 11.67 ± 0.33b 13.67 ± 0.33c 16.67 ± 0.33d 17.00 ± 0.58d NI N.A 14.00 ± 0.58c
C. N NI NI 8.00 ± 0.00a 11.33 ± 0.58b 14.00 ± 0.00c NI N.A 14.33 ± 0.58c
T. R 6.67 ± 0.58a 9.67 ± 0.58b 12.67 ± 0.58c 15.67 ± 0.58d 16.00 ± 0.00d NI N.A 10.00 ± 0.00b
Values are Mean ± S.E.M (mm), Values followed by different alphabet along the rows are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05, NI: No Inhibition, N.A: Not Applicable, Chl: Chloramphenicol, Myz: Miconazole, B.S: Bacillus subtilis, S.A: Staphylococcus aureus, E.C: Escherichia coli, Ps.A: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, A.F: Aspergillus flavus, C.A: Candida albicans, C.N: Cryptococcus neoformans, T. R: Trichophyton rubrum, S.E: Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Table 1: Antimicrobial activity of acetone extract of Lovoa trichiliodes leaf on selected human pathogens.

Conc. (mg/ml) Organisms 10 20 30 40 50 DMSO Chl Myz
B. S 8.67 ± 0.58a 12.33 ± 0.58b 16.33 ± 0.58c 19.33 ± 0.58d 22.00 ± 1.00e NI 11.33 ± 0.58b N.A
B. S ATCC6633 8.33 ± 0.33a 13.00 ± 0.58c 16.67 ± 0.33d 19.67 ± 0.33e 22.33 ± 0.33f NI 14.67 ± 0.58c N.A
S. A 3.67 ± 0.58a 6.33 ± 0.58b 10.33 ± 0.58c 14.67 ± 0.58e 19.67 ± 0.58f NI 13.67 ± 1.00d N.A
S. A ATCC25923 3.33 ± 0.33a 6.67 ± 0.33b 10.67 ± 0.33c 15.00 ± 0.58e 20.00 ± 0.58f NI 15.33 ± 0.33d N.A
E. C 6.33 ± 0.58a 10.33 ± 0.58b 13.33 ± 0.58d 15.67 ± 0.58e 19.33 ± 0.58f NI 11.33 ± 0.58c N.A
E. C ATCC25922 6.33 ± 0.33a 10.67 ± 0.33b 13.00 ± 0.00c 16.00 ± 0.58d 19.67 ± 0.33e NI 14.33 ± 0.67d N.A
K. P 5.33 ± 0.58a 9.67 ± 0.58b 13.33 ± 0.58c 16.33 ± 0.58d 21.33 ± 0.58e NI 13.33 ± 0.58c N.A
S. T NI 7.33 ± 1.15a 11.33 ± 0.58b 14.67 ± 0.58c 18.67 ± 0.58d NI 11.67 ± 0.33b N.A
S. T ATCC6539 NI 7.67 ± 0.33a 11.67 ± 0.33b 15.33 ± 0.33c 19.33 ± 0.33d NI 14.33 ± 0.67c N.A
Ps. A 9.00 ± 0.00a 12.33 ± 0.58b 16.33 ± 0.58c 18.67 ± 0.58d 20.33 ± 0.58e NI 11.67 ± 1.00b N.A
A. F NI NI 6.00 ± 0.00a 8.33 ± 0.58b 10.67 ± 0.58c NI N.A 10.00 ± 1.00c
C. A 7.67 ± 0.58a 11.33 ± 0.58b 13.67 ± 0.58c 16.33 ± 0.58d 18.33 ± 0.58e NI N.A 11.00 ± 0.00b
C. A ATCC10231 7.67 ± 0.33a 12.33 ± 0.33b 14.67 ± 0.67c 16.67 ± 0.33d 19.33 ± 0.33e NI N.A 13.67 ± 0.33c
Values are Mean ± S.E.M (mm), Values followed by different alphabet along the rows are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05, NI: No Inhibition, N.A: Not Applicable, Chl: Chloramphenicol, Myz: Miconazole, B.S: Bacillus subtilis, S.A: Staphylococcus aureus, E.C: Escherichia coli, K.P: Klebsiella pneumoniae, Ps.A: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, S.T: Salmonella typhi, A.F: Aspergillus flavus, C.A: Candida albicans.

Table 2: Antimicrobial activity of acetone extract of Lovoa trichiliodes stem bark on selected human pathogens.

Conc. (µg/ml)/ Organisms 6.3 12.5 25 50 DMSO Chl Myz
B. S NI 7.33 ± 0.33a 10.00 ± 0.58b 12.67 ± 0.33c NI 11.00 ± 0.58b N.A
B. S ATCC6633 5.33 ± 0.33a 8.00 ± 0.58b 10.00 ± 1.00c 13.00 ± 0.58d NI 13.33 ± 0.33d N.A
S. A 6.33 ± 0.33a 7.33 ± 0.33a 11.33 ± 0.33b 12.33 ± 0.33b NI 11.33 ± 0.33b N.A
S. A ATCC25923 6.00 ± 0.00a 8.33 ± 0.33b 11.33 ± 0.33c 14.33 ± 0.33e NI 13.00 ± 0.58d N.A
S. P NI NI NI 5.33 ± 0.33a NI 11.67 ± 0.33b N.A
S. E NI NI 4.33 ± 0.33a 8.00 ± 0.58b NI 15.67 ± 0.33c N.A
SSP NI NI NI 3.33 ± 0.88a NI 13.00 ± 0.58b N.A
E. C 6.00 ± 0.00a 8.33 ± 0.33b 11.33 ± 0.33c 14.67 ± 0.33e NI 13.67 ± 0.33d N.A
E. C ATCC25922 6.33 ± 0.33a 9.67 ± 0.67b 11.33 ± 0.33b 16.00 ± 0.58c NI 15.67 ± 0.67c N.A
E. F 7.00 ± 0.00a 10.00 ± 0.58b 14.33 ± 0.33d 18.00 ± 0.58e NI 11.33 ± 0.33c N.A
K. P NI NI 6.33 ± 0.33a 8.33 ± 0.33b NI 10.00 ± 0.58c N.A
A.F NI NI NI 7.33 ± 0.33a NI N.A 10.00 ± 0.58b
C. A NI NI NI 9.33 ± 0.88a NI N.A 11.00 ± 0.58b
C. A ATCC10231 NI NI NI 8.00 ± 0.58a NI N.A 14.33 ± 0.33b
C. G NI 4.00 ± 0.58a 6.33 ± 0.33b 9.33 ± 0.33c NI N.A 11.67 ± 0.33d
Values are Mean ± S.E.M (mm), Values followed by different alphabet along the rows are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05, NI: No Inhibition, N.A: Not Applicable, Chl: Chloramphenicol, Myz: Miconazole, B.S: Bacillus subtilis, S.A: Staphylococcus aureus, E.C: Escherichia coli, E.F: Enterococcus faecalis, K. P: Klebsiella pneumoniae, A.F: Aspergillus flavus, C.A: Candida albicans, C.G: Candida glabrata, S.P: Streptococcus pyogenes, SSP: Streptococcus species, S.E: Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Table 3: Antimicrobial activity of essential oil extracts of Lovoa trichiliodes leaf on selected human pathogens

Conc. (µg/ml)/
Organisms
6.3 12.5 25 50 DMSO Chl Myz
B. S 6.33 ± 0.33a 7.67 ± 0.67b 13.33 ± 0.33d 17.33 ± 0.33e NI 11.00 ± 0.00c N.A
B. S ATCC6633 6.33 ± 0.33a 10.33 ± 0.33b 12.00 ± 0.00c 18.00 ± 0.58e NI 14.67 ± 0.67d N.A
S. A 7.33 ± 0.33a 11.33 ± 0.33b 14.67 ± 0.67c 19.33 ± 0.33d NI 13.67 ± 0.00c N.A
S. A ATCC25923 8.00 ± 0.00a 11.67 ± 0.33b 15.33 ± 0.33c 19.67 ± 0.33d NI 15.33 ± 0.33c N.A
E. C 7.33 ± 0.33a 11.67 ± 0.33b 14.33 ± 0.33c 18.33 ± 0.33d NI 11.33 ± 0.00b N.A
E. C ATCC25922 8.33 ± 0.33a 13.33 ± 0.33b 17.00 ± 0.58c 20.33 ± 0.88d NI 14.33 ± 0.67b N.A
E. F 5.33 ± 0.33a 7.00 ± 0.00b 10.00 ± 0.58c 16.33 ± 0.33d NI 17.33 ± 0.33d N.A
K. P NI 8.33 ± 0.33a 10.67 ± 0.33b 12.33 ± 0.33c NI 13.33 ± 0.00d N.A
S. T NI NI NI 6.00 ± 0.58a NI 11.67 ± 0.00b N.A
S. T ATCC6539 NI NI 5.33 ± 0.33a 11.33 ± 0.33b NI 14.33 ± 0.67c N.A
Ps. A NI 6.33 ± 0.33a 9.33 ± 0.33b 13.33 ± 0.33d NI 11.67 ± 0.00c N.A
A. F NI NI 6.33 ± 0.33a 7.33 ± 0.33b NI N.A 10.00 ± 0.00c
C. A NI 3.00 ± 0.58a 8.33 ± 0.33b 10.67 ± 0.33c NI N.A 11.00 ± 0.00c
C. A ATCC10231 NI 4.33 ± 0.33a 8.33 ± 0.33b 11.33 ± 0.33c NI N.A 13.67 ± 0.33d
Values are Mean ± S.E.M (mm), Values followed by different alphabet along the rows are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05, NI: No Inhibition, N.A: Not Applicable, Chl: Chloramphenicol, Myz: Miconazole, B.S: Bacillus subtilis, S.A: Staphylococcus aureus, E.C: Escherichia coli, E.F: Enterococcus faecalis, K. P: Klebsiella pneumoniae, A.F: Aspergillus flavus, C.A: Candida albicans, C.G: Candida glabrata, S.P: Streptococcus pyogenes, SSP: Streptococcus species, S.E: Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Table 4: Antimicrobial activity of essential oil from Lovoa trichiliodes stem bark on selected human pathogens.

Test Organisms MIC MBC/MFC
leaf Bark Leaf Bark
Bacillus subtilis 25 2.5 50 7.5
Bacillus subtilisATCC6633 25 2.5 40 5
Staphylococcus aureus 2.5 5 7.5 10
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC25923 2.5 5 5 5
Staphylococcus epidermidis 200 100 ND ND
Escherichia coli 10 5 40 15
Escherichia coli ATCC25922 10 5 40 12.5
Klebsiellapneumoniae 15 5 30 20
Salmonella typhi 200 15 ND 30
Salmonella typhi ATCC6539 200 15 ND 25
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 2.5 2.5 5 7.5
Aspergilusflavus 25 25 50 50
Candida albicans 15 5 40 20
Candida albicans ATCC10231 15 5 40 20
Cryptococcus neoformans ND 100 ND ND
Trichophytonrubrum ND 200 ND ND
ND: Not Detected.

Table 5: The MIC and MBC/MFC of acetone extracts of L. trichiliodes Harm. on the selected organisms.

Test Organisms MIC MBC/MFC
Leaf Bark Leaf Bark
B. subtilis 10 5 20 7.5
B. subtilisATCC6633 10 5 20 10
S. aureus 6.3 5 10 7.5
S. aureusATCC25923 5 5 10 10
S. pyogenes 30 ND 50 ND
S. epidermidis 25 ND 40 ND
Streptococcus spp 40 ND 60 ND
E. coli 3 3 5 5
E. coli ATCC25922 3 3 5 5
E. faecalis 3 5 7.5 10
K. pneumonia 10 7.5 15 15
S. typhi ND 20 ND 40
S. typhiATCC6539 ND 15 ND 25
Ps. aeruginosa ND 7.5 ND 15
A. flavus 40 20 75 40
C. albicans 40 10 60 15
C. albicansATCC10231 40 10 50 20
ND: Not Detected.

Table 6: The MIC and MBC/MFC of Essential oils from L. trichiliodes on the selected organisms (μg/ml).

The radical scavenging activity of the extracts and essential oils of L. trichiliodes was measured by the in vitro DPPH assay. The percentage (%) scavenging of DPPH free radical was found to be concentration dependent at 517 nm. The more rapidly the absorbance decreases, the more potent the antioxidant activity of the sample in term of its hydrogen atom donating capacity [15]. The results of antioxidant and cytotoxic activities of the acetone extracts and essential oils of the plant materials as presented in Tables 7 and 8 respectively showed that all extracts and essential oils exhibited good DPPH radical inhibition activity compared with ascorbic acid and high cytotoxic property.

Conc. (mg/ml) Stem bark extract Leaf extract Stem bark oil Leaf oil Ascorbic acid
0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00
0.05 03.33 ± 0.03a 04.17 ± 0.02a 06.25 ± 0.03b 05.33 ± 0.88b 09.42 ± 0.04c
0.10 11.42 ± 0.03a 15.64 ± 0.57b 56.86 ± 0.03d 10.64 ± 0.03a 46.27 ± 0.03c
0.20 25.15 ± 0.01b 24.27 ± 0.15b 64.46 ± 0.07c 15.33 ± 0.88a 56.25 ± 0.03c
0.40 27.46 ± 0.01b 29.18 ± 0.00b 71.88 ± 0.06d 19.38 ± 0.01a 64.38 ± 0.01c
0.60 32.51 ± 0.00b 32.62 ± 0.01b 76.26 ± 0.02c 26.25 ± 0.03a 77.50 ± 0.06c
0.80 38.17 ± 0.13b 37.93 ± 0.01b 80.64 ± 0.03c 29.36 ± 0.03a 81.86 ± 0.03c
1.00 41.14 ± 1.15a 38.16 ± 0.02a 83.14 ± 0.03b 38.76 ± 0.06a 83.77 ± 0.02b
1.20 52.21 ± 0.10b 42.41 ± 0.15a 86.88 ± 0.01c 46.81 ± 0.12a 86.40 ± 0.31c
1.40 59.14 ± 0.01b 48.05 ± 0.25a 89.36 ± 0.03c 51.85 ± 0.04a 89.39 ± 0.06c
1.60 63.75 ± 0.14b 56.21 ± 0.00a 88.14 ± 0.03c 60.64 ± 0.03ab 90.64 ± 0.03c
1.80 62.33 ± 0.15a 59.75 ± 0.01a 90.33 ± 0.88b 67.53 ± 0.07a 91.81 ± 0.14b
2.00 66.18 ± 0.02ab 61.42 ± 0.01a 88.14 ± 0.03c 70.66 ± 0.02b 93.81 ± 0.05c
IC50 1.23 ± 0.15c 1.65 ± 0.03d 0.81 ± 0.15b 1.52 ± 0.03d 0.40 ± 0.15a

Table 7: Antioxidant activity of acetone extracts and essential oil of Lovoa trichiliodes (%DPPH scavenging inhibition).

Dosage(ppm)
Leaf
Initial larvae Acetone Essential oil
No. of survivors No. of deaths % mortality No. of survivors No. of deaths % mortality
1000 20 0 20.00 ± 0.00b 100 2 18.00 ± 0.00a 90
100 20 3 17.00 ± 1.00b 85 6 14.33 ± 0.00a 70
10 20 4 16.00 ± 0.02b 80 16 4.00 ± 0.00a 20
1 20 8 12.33 ± 0.05b 60      
LC50       0.71     52.65
Stem bark
1000 20 0 20.00 ± 0.00b 100 1 19.00 ± 0.00a 95
100 20 6 14.00 ± 0.00a 70 7 13.00 ± 0.00b 65
10 20 7 13.00 ± 1.01a 65 5 5.00 ± 0.00b 25
1 20 10 10.33 ± 0.02b 50      
LC50       0.92     49.65
Values followed by different superscripts across each row are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05

Table 8: Percentage mortality of brine shrimps at different concentrations of acetone extract and Essential oils of Lovoa trichiliodes.

It was observed that the stem bark extract and essential oil showed higher DPPH free radical scavenging activity than the leaf extract and essential oil with IC50 values of 1.23 ± 0.15, 0.81 ± 0.15 and 1.65 ± 0.03, 1.52 ± 0.03 when compared with the ascorbic acid used as reference (0.40 ± 0.15) respectively. These results can be a strong scientific evidence of the use of this plant as a source of antioxidants.

Brine shrimps cytotoxic assay is a simple, quick and economical bioassay which has been designed to evaluate the cytotoxic potential of active natural products [16]. The result of cytotoxic activities of the L. trichiliodes extracts and essential oils had marked cytotoxic effect on brine shrimp larvae which was concentration dependent with percentage mortality of 50-100% and 25-95% and LC50 of 0.71 and 0.92; and 52.65 and 49.65 respectively for the leaf and stem bark acetone extracts and essential oils of the plant. It indicates the presence of anticancer activity of both the extracts and essential oils.

Conclusion

The results obtained in the study have shown that acetone extracts and essential oils of L. trichiliodes plant materials demonstrated significantly, good antimicrobial, antioxidant and anticancer activities against the test microorganisms, and may be exploited for discovery and development of new therapeutic agents. Further investigations should be conducted to isolate pure compounds in this plant for the development of new antimicrobial agents.

Acknowledgement

The Authors are grateful to the Management of Rufus Giwa Polytechnic, Owo, Nigeria and Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria for providing the facilities for the research. We also thank the Authorities of Federal Medical Centre, Owo and Federal Institute of Research Oshodi, Lagos for the supply of test clinical and typed microorganisms respectively.

References

  1. Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ (2012) Azole antifungal drug cross-resistance: resistance mechanisms, epidemiology and clinical significance. Journal of Invasive Fungal Infection 1:74-92.
  2. Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR (2006) Complementary and alternative medicine. In Disease control priorities in Developing Countries, World Bank, Washington, DC, USA, (2ndedn).
  3. Akthar MS, Degaga B, Azam T (2014) Antimicrobial activity of essential oils extracted from medicinal plants against the pathogenic microorganisms: A review. Biological Sciences and Pharmaceutical Research 2:1-7.
  4. Dhekra T, Ahlem HA, Faten B, Fethi Z (2014) Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities of Essential oils and Methanolic Extracts of Tu-sian Citrus aurantium L. Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology 8: 18-27.
  5. Sneh L, Geetika S, Harmanjot KS (2014) Antimicrobial properties of various medicinal plants extracts against Klebsiella sp. International Research Journal of Environment Sciences 3: 75-78.
  6. Idu M, Igeleke CL (2012) Antimicrobial activity and phytochemistry of Khayasenegalensis roots. International Journal of Aryurvedic and Herbal Medicine 2: 416-422.
  7. Onifade AK, Fatope MO, Deadman ML, AI-Kindy SMZ (2008) Nematicidal Activity of Haplophylumtuberculatum and Plectranthuscylindraceus oils on Meloidogyne Java-ca. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 36: 679-683.
  8. Fadipe DO, Onifade AK (2015) Antibacterial and toxicological properties of essential oils of CymbopogoncitratusStapf and KhayaivorensisChev. International Journal of Innovative Research and Advanced Studies 2: 28-32.
  9. Perez C, Pauli M, Bazerque P (1990) An antibiotic assay by the agar-well diffusion method. Actabiologiaeet Medicine Experimentalis, 15:113-115.
  10. Koto Nyiwa N, Rosie EN, Mubindukila PT, Damien STT, Masengo CA, et al.(2014) Phytochemical screening, Antibacterial and Antioxidant Activities of Anthocleistaliebrechtsiana Wild & T. Durand (Gentianaceae) Originated from Democratic Republic of the Congo. J. Advancement in Medical and Life Sciences 1: 1-6.
  11. Hag IU, Mannan A, Ahmed I, Hussain I, Jamul M, et al. (2012) Antimicrobial activity and Brine Shrimp toxicity of Artemisia dubia extract. Pakistan Journal of Botany 44: 1487-1490.
  12. Abbott WS (1987) A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 3: 302-303.
  13. Meyer BN, Ferrigni NR, Putma JE, Jacobson LB, Nicholas DE et al. (1982) Brine Shrimp: a convenient general bioassay for active plant constituents. Planta Medicine 45: 31-34.
  14. Saroglou V, Dorizas N, Kypriotakis Z, Skaltsa HD (2006) Analysis of the essential oil composition of eight Anthemis species from Greece.J Chromatogr A 1104: 313-322.
  15. Alasalvar C, Karama AM, Kosiaska A, Rybarczyk A, Shahidi F, et al. (2009) Antioxidant activity of hazelnut skin phenolics. J Agric Food Chem 57: 4645-4650.
  16. Ghias U,Abdur R, Bina SS, Haroon K (2013) Cytotoxic Activity of Extracts/Fractions of various parts of Pistaeiaintegerrima (stewart). Translational Traditional Medicine 3:1-4.
Citation: Opawale BO, Onifade AK, Ogundare AO (2015) Evaluation of Antimicrobial, Antioxidant and Cytotoxic Activity of Lovoa trichiliodes Extracts and Essential Oils. Med Aromat Plants 5:222.

Copyright: © 2015 Opawale BO, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top