Mycobacterial Diseases

Mycobacterial Diseases
Open Access

ISSN: 2161-1068

+44 1478 350008

Research Article - (2013) Volume 3, Issue 1

Evaluation of Fibronectin-Binding Protein Ag85-B as Target for Serodiagnosis of Swine Mycobacteriosis in Living Animals

Amr M. Mohamed1,2*, Ghada A. Abou El-Ella1,2, Essam A. Nasr3 and Youssef A. Soliman4
1Department of Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
2Department of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Saudi Arabia
3Bacterial Diagnostic Product, Veterinary Serum and Vaccine Research Institute, Abbassia, Cairo, Egypt
4Central Laboratory for Quality Control of Veterinary Biologics, Abbassia, Cairo, Egypt
*Corresponding Author: Amr M. Mohamed, Department of Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt Email:

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to evaluate the fibronectin-binding protein Ag85-B as a potential antigen for ELISA-based serodiagnosis of swine mycobacteriosis in living pigs. The validity of Ag85-B, in comparison with tuberculin purified protein derivatives (PPD), for the serodiagnosis of swine mycobacteriosis was investigated in the current study. A total of 89 serum samples from previously confirmed Mycobacterium and non-Mycobacteriuminfected slaughtered pigs were used for the evaluation study. These included 66 serum samples from confirmed cases with swine mycobacteriosis and 23 samples from non-Mycobacterium infected cases. Obtained ELISA results revealed an overall accuracy index, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 87.6%, 87.9%, 86.9%, 95.1%, and 71.4%, respectively for Ag85-B as compared to 80.9%, 86.4%, 65.2%, 87.7%, and 62.5%, respectively for tuberculin PPD. In conclusion, the study revealed the reliability of Ag85-B as a potential candidate for ELISA-based serological assay that would provide for early and rapid diagnosis of swine mycobacterial infections in living animals.

Introduction

During the last two decades, infection with tuberculous, as well as non-tuberculous mycobacteria has become increasingly important among human beings and farm animals [1,2]. The pandemic of HIV infection in many part of the world, as well as the emergence of multidrug resistant (MDR) tuberculosis have complicated the disease control process [3]. Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex are the most frequently isolated mycobacteria from AIDS patients [4,5]. Origin of mycobacterial infections in humans is still a matter of speculation. Previous studies have shown that pigs are among important sources of mycobacterial infections to man [6,7].

Diagnosis of swine mycobacteriosis in living pigs has been a major hindrance in efforts to study the disease. Clinical signs of diagnostic value are usually absent and reliability of the tuberculin skin test has been questioned [8]. Majority of cases are diagnosed only during regular meat inspection in slaughterhouses by detection of suspected mycobacterial lesions in carcasses [9,10]. However, many cases can escape postmortem examination especially during early stage of infection [11,12]. In some other cases, it is difficult to differentiate lesions caused by mycobacterial infections from other lesions [13,14]. Unreliability of the tuberculin skin test for diagnosis of swine tuberculosis has drawn attention towards serodiagnosis as an alternative for diagnosis of swine mycobacteriosis in living animals [8,15,16].

Culture filtrates prepared from tuberculous Mycobacterium spp. are complex mixture of several antigenic proteins [17]. A major portion of the secreted proteins in M. tuberculosis and M. bovis BCG culture filtrate is formed of the antigen 85 (Ag85) complex, a 30-32 kDa family of three fibronectin-binding proteins (Ag85-A, Ag85-B, and Ag85-C) [18]. All members of Ag85 complex possess a mycoloyltransferase enzyme activity required for the biogenesis of cord factor, a dominant structure necessary for maintaining cell wall integrity [19,20]. The Ag85 complex molecules have been reported to be the dominantly secreted antigens expressed by nearly all mycobacterial species [18]. Ag85 complex molecules are highly conserved among Mycobacterium spp. and thus revealed species-specific properties [15,21].

The aim of the current study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of Ag85-B as a potential ELISA candidate, in comparison with tuberculin PPD, for serological diagnosis of swine mycobacterial infections in living animals.

Materials and Methods

Study samples

A total of 89 serum samples from previously investigated and confirmed infected pigs, based on mycobacteriological and molecular examination, [22] were used for the current evaluation study. Investigated samples included 66 samples from animals whose suspected lesions were previously confirmed positive for Mycobacterium bovis [7], M. tuberculosis [22] and other non-tuberculous Mycobacterium spp. [23] The remaining 23 samples were from animals whose suspected lesions were positive for bacteria other than Mycobacterium spp. (non- Mycobacterium isolates) and were used to assess the cross-reaction probability of Ag85-B to other non-mycobacterial bacteria. In addition, 28 serum samples were obtained from apparently healthy lesionsfree pigs and were used as healthy control subjects for the purpose of calculating the optimal cut-off points for distinguishing between positive and negative results for both Ag85-B and tuberculin PPD antigens.

Serological examination

Bacterial strains and preparation of antigens: The M. bovis AN5 standard strain (supplied by the Central Veterinary Laboratory, Weybridge, England) was used throughout the study. M. bovis AN5 cultures were grown to log phase in Middlebrook 7H9 liquid medium supplemented with Middlebrook ADC enrichmenta then were sub cultured as surface pellicles on the wholly synthetic Sauton medium for 3-8 weeks. The supernatants were collected by centrifugation and then filtered through a 0.22 μm Millipore membraneb (Cambridge, MA, USA) to remove remaining mycobacteria. The whole Culture Filtrate (CF) proteins were then precipitated with ammonium sulfate (55%) for 18 h at 4°C, and the resulting precipitate was dissolved and dialyzed against 1 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) for 18 h at 4°C. The PPD antigen was prepared from the heated CF as previously described [24], while the native Ag85-B antigen was purified from the unheated CF by sequential ion-exchange chromatography and reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography to yield a single 29 to 30 kd component as previously described [21].

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (elisa)

For serological evaluation, indirect ELISA was carried out using both Ag85-B and tuberculin PPD antigens as previously described [25] with some modifications. Briefly, Immulon II 96 microtiter platesc were coated with either Ag85-B (0.5 μg/100 μl carbonate buffer, pH 9.6) or tuberculin PPD (5 μg/100 μl carbonate buffer, pH 9.6, containing 1% carbodiamide) and were incubated for 24 hours. The plates were then decanted and blocked with 2% bovine serum albumin for 2 h. 100 μl of 1/100 diluted serum was added to each well and plates were incubated at 37°C/2h. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-pig was used as a secondary antibody. The substrate used was OPDd. The plates were washed four times between each step with PBS containing 0.1% Tween20. All reaction mixtures were set in duplicate, with the mean value being used for recording and calculations. Results were read on SOFTmax PRO ELISA readere at a wave length of 450 nm.

Evaluation of tests and statistical analysis

Analysis of mean optical density (OD) values of both antigens with different serum samples groups were carried out using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 10.0. Data were presented as the mean OD ± SD and the OD range. The optimal cut-off points for distinguishing between positive and negative results for both antigens were determined by Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis using Analyse-it Softwaref [21]. The tested antigens were evaluated in terms of accuracy index, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values as described elsewhere [26].

Results

Results of Ag85-B and tuberculin PPD-based ELISA

The ROC curve was constructed for both antigens and the obtained results revealed cutoff values for Ag 85-B and tuberculin PPD as 0.144 (Figure 1) and 0.212 (Figure 2). Based on the calculated cut-off points, Ag85-B-based ELISA was able to detect a total of 58 (87.9%) out of 66 confirmed Mycobacterium species-infected animals and 3 (13.04%) out of the 23 non-Mycobacterium species infected animals. On the other hand, tuberculin PPD-based ELISA was able to detect 57 (86.4%) out of 66 confirmed Mycobacterium species-infected animals and 8 (34.8%) out of 23 non-Mycobacterium species infected animals (Table 1).

mycobacterial-diseases-ELISA-data

Figure 1: ROC curve obtained from the analysis of ELISA data from suspected sera against Ag85-B. The optimal cutoff value and area under the curve (AUC) were 0.144 and 0.944, respectively.

mycobacterial-diseases-cutoff-value

Figure 2: ROC curve obtained from the analysis of ELISA data from suspected sera against PPD. The optimal cutoff value and area under the curve (AUC) were 0.212 and 0.934, respectively.

Confirmed bacterial identification NO. Ag58-B PPD antigen
Mean OD ± SD (OD range) +ve cases * % Mean OD ± SD (OD range) +ve cases † %
M. bovis 12 0.546 ± 0.156
(0.209– 0.748)
12 100 0.534 ± 0.145
(0.203 – 0.821)
11 91.7
M. tuberculosis 18 0.560 ± 0.203
(0.203 – 0.862)
18 100 0.544 ± 0.131
(0.323 – 0.794)
18 100
Non-tuberculous Mycobacterium spp. 36 0.364 ± 0.173
(0.074 – 0.674)
28 77.8 0.544 ± 0.131
(0.323 – 0.794)
28 77.8
Sub-total 66   58 87.9   57 86.4
Non-Mycobacterium spp. 23 0.126 ± 0.025
(0.076 - 0.189)
3 13 0.180 ± 0.086
(0.086 – 0.376)
8 34.8
* cutoff point for Ag85-B = 0.144, † cutoff point for tuberculin PPD = 0.212

Table 1: Serodiagnosis of swine mycobacteriosis by ELISA detection of anti-mycobacterial IgG in swine sera using Ag85-B and tuberculin PPD antigens.

Validity of Ag85-B and tuberculin PPD-based ELISA

Based on the results of both Ag85-B and tuberculin PPD-based ELISA with confirmed Mycobacterium species and non-Mycobacterium species infected cases, true and false positive and negative values were calculated for each protein (Table 2). Regarding the validity of evaluated antigens for the serodiagnosis of swine mycobacteriosis, obtained results revealed an overall accuracy index, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 87.6%, 87.9%, 86.9%, 95.1%, and 71.4%, respectively for Ag85-B as compared to 80.9%, 86.4%, 65.2%, 87.7%, and 62.5%, respectively for tuberculin PPD (Table 2).

Methods Test Results Validity parameters (%)
TP* TN FP FN§ SN¦ SP# AI PPV** NPV††
Ag85-B ELISA 58 20 3 8 87.9 86.9 87.6 95.1 71.4
Tuberculin PPD-ELISA 57 15 8 9 86.4 65.2 80.9 87.7 62.5
*true positive; true negative; false positive; §false negative; ¦sensitivity; #specificity; Accuracy index; **positive predictive value; ††negative predictive value

Table 2: Evaluation of Ag85-B and Tuberculin PPD- based ELISA for diagnosis of Swine mycobacteriosis

Discussion

Swine mycobacteriosis represents a public health threat in many countries for being a potential reservoir of many mycobacterial infections for other farm animals as well as contact humans [27-29]. Tuberculin skin testing is unreliable for diagnosis of swine tuberculosis in living pigs [16]. Therefore, diagnosis of swine mycobacteriosis and studying of its prevalence in live animals is usually impossible and it still based mainly on post-mortem findings by meat inspectors [10]. In the current study, the fibronectin-binding protein Ag85-B was purified and evaluated serologically, in comparison with the tuberculin PPD, as a potential candidate for rapid screening of swine mycobacteriosis in living pigs. The ROC curve [a plot of the true positive rate (sensitivity) against the false positive rate (1-specificity) that is obtained at each cutoff point] was constructed using the OD readings of both antigens with both infected and non-infected sera. The AUC value was calculated as a measure of the accuracy of the test and they were 0.944 for Ag85-B (Figure 1) and 0.934 for PPD tuberculin (Figure 2). This shows that in more than 93% of cases, an animal giving a result above the cutoff value was correctly identified [30].

Serodiagnosis of swine mycobacteriosis using Ag85-B and tuberculin PPD have showed that both Ag85-B and tuberculin PPD antigens have comparable sensitivity (87.9 and 86.4, respectively), however, the specificity, AI, PPV and NPV for Ag85-B were considerably higher (86.9%, 87.6 %, 95.1 and 71.4%, respectively) than that (65.2%, 80.9%, 87.7% and 62.5%, respectively) of tuberculin PPD (Table 2). The higher specificity and positive predictive value of Ag85-B as compared to that of tuberculin PPD could be attributed to the fact that PPD is a protein complex that contains many shared antigenic epitopes with other nonmycobacterial organism, which greatly affect its specificity in diagnosis of mycobacterial infection [31]. On the other hand, Ag85 complex molecules have been reported to be the dominant secreted antigens that are highly specific and conserved among Mycobacterium spp. and thus revealed species specific properties [15,21,32]. In previous studies, the use of multiple overlapping peptides corresponding to the entire sequence of the antigen 85 revealed the presence of at least seven Tcell determinants with high homology between the antigen 85 purified from both M. bovis BCG and M. tuberculosis [32]. The same epitopes were found in the M. avium strains but with much less homology indicating that the antigen could have potential diagnostic capabilities for both M. tuberculosis complex as well as M. avium intracellulare complex [15,33].

In conclusion, the overall validation parameters of Ag85-B revealed the reliability of the proposed antigen for serological diagnosis of swine mycobacteriosis among living animals. The assay would provide for rapid and early detection of both tuberculous and non-tuberculous mycobacterial infections of living pigs and help to control the disease and prevent its dissemination among other farm animals and contact humans.

References

  1. Bottger EC (1994) Mycobacterium genavense: an emerging pathogen. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 13: 932-936.
  2. Butler WR, O'Connor SP (1993) Mycobacterium celatum sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 43: 539-548.
  3. Wayne LG, Sramek HA (1992) Agents of newly recognized or infrequently encountered mycobacterial diseases. Clin Microbiol Rev 5: 1-25.
  4. Benson CA (1994) Disease due to the Mycobacterium avium complex in patients with AIDS: epidemiology and clinical syndrome. Clin Infect Dis 18: S218-S222.
  5. LoBue PA, Peter C, Tracy M, Moser K (2001) Concurrent Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis infections in a patient with AIDS. Int J Tuber Lung Dis5: 1164-1165.
  6. Bono M, Jemmi T, Bernasconi C, Burki D, Telenti A, et al. (1995) Genotypic characterisation of Mycobacterium avium strains recovered from animals and their comparison to human strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 61: 371-373.
  7. Komijn RE, de Haas PE, Schneider MM, Eger T, Nieuwenhuijs JH, et al. (1999) Prevalence of Mycobacterium avium in slaughter pigs in The Netherlands and comparison of IS1245 restriction fragment length polymorphism patterns of porcine and human isolates. J Clin Microbiol 37: 1254-1259.
  8. Songer JG, Bicknell EJ, Thoen CO (1980) Epidemiological investigation of swine tuberculosis in Arizona. Can J Comp Med 44: 115-120.
  9. Brown J, Neuman MA (1979) Lesions of swine lymph nodes as a diagnostic test to determine Mycobacterial infection. Appl Environ Microbiol37: 740-743.
  10. Dey BP, Parham GL (1993) Incidence and economics of tuberculosis in swine slaughtered from 1976 to 1988. J Am Vet Med Assoc203: 516-519.
  11. Matlova L, Dvorska L, Ayele WY, Bartos M, Amemori T, et al. (2005) Distribution of Mycobacterium aviumComplex Isolates in Tissue Samples of Pigs Fed Peat Naturally Contaminated with Mycobacteria as a Supplement. J Clin Microbiol 43: 1261-1268.
  12. Windsor RS, Durrant DS, Burn KJ (1984) Avian tuberculosis in pigs: Mycobacterium intracellulare infection in a breeding herd. Vet Rec114: 497-500.
  13. Katsumi M, Kodama N, Miki Y, Hiramune T, Kikuchi N, et al. (1991) Typing of Rhodococcus equi isolated from submaxillary lymph nodes of pigs in Japan. Zentralbl Veterinarmed B 38: 299-302.
  14. Makrai L, Takayama S, Dénes B, Hajtós I, Sasaki Y, et al. (2005) Characterization of Virulence Plasmids and Serotyping of Rhodococcus equi Isolates from Submaxillary Lymph Nodes of Pigs in Hungary. J Clin Microbiol 43: 1246-1250.
  15. Schorey JS, Holsti MA, Ratliff TL, Allen PM, Brown EJ (1996) Characterization of the fibronectin-attachment protein of Mycobacterium avium reveals a fibronectin-binding motif conserved among mycobacteria. Mol Microbiol21: 321-329.
  16. Thoen CO, Armbrust AL, Hopkins MP (1979) Enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay for detecting antibodies in swine infected with Mycobacterium avium. Am J Vet Res 40: 1096-1099.
  17. Daniel TM, Anderson PA (1978) The isolation by immunosorbent affinity chromatography and physicochemical characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen 5. Am Rev Respir Dis 117: 533-539.
  18. Wiker HG, Harboe M (1992) The antigen 85 complex: a major secretion product of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microbiol Rev 56: 648-661.
  19. Belisle JT, Vissa VD, Sievert T, Takayama K, Brennan PJ, et al. (1997) Role of the major antigen of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in cell wall biogenesis. Science276: 1420-1422.
  20. Jackson M, Raynaud C, Lanéelle MA, Guilhot C, Laurent-Winter C, et al. (1999) Inactivation of the antigen 85C gene profoundly affects the mycolate content and alters the permeability of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis cell envelope. Mol Microbiol31: 1573-1587.
  21. Salata RA, Sanson AJ, Malhotra IJ, Wiker HG, Harboe M, et al. (1991) Purification and characteriz-ation of the 30,000 dalton native antigen of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and characterization of six monoclonal antibodies reactive with a major epitope of this antigen. J Lab Clin Med118: 589-598.
  22. Mohamed AM, Abou El-Ella GA, Nasr EA (2009) Phenotypic and molecular typing of tuberculous and nontuberculous Mycobacterium species from slaughtered pigs in Egypt. J Vet Diag Invest 21: 48-52.
  23. Wisselink HJ, van Solt-Smits CB, Oorburg D, van Soolingen D, Overduin P, et al. (2010) Serodiagnosis of Mycobacterium avium infections in pigs. Vet Microbiol 142: 401-407.
  24. Landi S (1984) Production and standardization of tuberculin (a brief history). Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci 24: 78-87.
  25. Sada E, Ferguson LE, Daniel TM (1990) An ELISA for the serodiagnosis of tuberculosis using 30,000 Da native antigen of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Infect Dis162: 928-931.
  26. Smith RD (1995) Veterinary Clinical Epidemiology: A problem-Orinted Approach, pp. 31-52. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Ranton, Florida, USA.
  27. Leão SC, Briones MR, Sircili MP, Balian SC, Mores N, et al. (1999) Identification of two novel Mycobacterium avium allelic variants in pig and human isolates from Brazil by PCR-restriction enzyme analysis. J Clin Microbiol37: 2592-2597.
  28. Phillips CJ, Foster CR, Morris PA, Teverson R (2003) The transmission of Mycobacterium bovis infection to cattle. Res Vet Sci 74: 1-15.
  29. Pollock JM, Girvin RM, Lightbody KA, Clements RA, Neill SD, et al. (2000) Assessment of defined antigens for the diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis in skin test-reactor cattle. Vet Rec146: 659-665.
  30. Surujballi OP, Romanowska A, Sugden EA, Turcotte C, Jolley ME (2002) A fluorescence polarization assay for the detection of antibodies to Mycobacterium bovis in cattle sera. Vet Microbiol87: 149-157.
  31. Fifis T, Costopoulos C, Radford AJ, Bacic A, Wood PR (1991) Purification and characterization of major antigens of a Mycobacterium bovis culture filtrate. Infect Immun 59: 800-807.
  32. Silver RF, Wallis RS, Ellner JJ (1995) Mapping of T-cell epitopes of the 30KDa antigen of Mycobacterium bovis, strain Bacillus Calmette-Guiein in purified protein (PPD) positive individuals. J Immunol 154: 4665-4674.
  33. Secott TE, Lin TL, Wu CC (2001) Fibronectin attachment protein homologue mediates fibronectin binding by Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. Infect Immun69: 2075-2082.
Citation: Mohamed AM, El-Ella GAA, Nasr EA, Soliman YA (2012) Evaluation of Fibronectin-Binding Protein Ag85-B as Target for Serodiagnosis of Swine Mycobacteriosis in Living Animals. J Mycobac Dis 3:124.

Copyright: © 2012 Mohamed AM, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top