Journal of Thermodynamics & Catalysis

Journal of Thermodynamics & Catalysis
Open Access

ISSN: 2157-7544

+44 1300 500008

Research Article - (2015) Volume 6, Issue 1

Exploration of Solution Behaviour of Potassium Halides in Mixtures of LProline and Water at 298.15, 308.15 and 318.15 K

Mahendra Nath Roy*, Partha Sarathi Sikdar and Pritam De
Department of Chemistry, University of North Bengal, Darjeeling 734013, India, E-mail: parthasarthis34@yahoo.com
*Corresponding Author: Mahendra Nath Roy, Department of Chemistry, University of North Bengal, Darjeeling-734013, India, Tel: +91-353-2776381, Fax: +91-353- 2699001 Email:

Abstract

Apparent molar volume ( φV ) and viscosity B-coefficients were estimated for potassium chloride, potassium bromide and potassium iodide in aqueous mixture of L-Proline from measured solution density (ρ) and viscosity (η) at 298.15, 308.15 and 318.15 K at various electrolyte concentrations. The experimental density data were evaluated by Masson equation and the derived data were interpreted in terms of ion-solvent and ion-ion interactions. The viscosity data has been analyzed using Jones-Dole equation and the derived parameters, B and A, have also been interpreted in terms of ion-solvent and ion-ion interactions respectively. The structure-making or breaking capacity of the electrolyte under investigation has been discussed in terms of sign( ∂φV0 / ∂T )P.

Keywords: Potassium chloride; Potassium bromide; Potassium iodide; L-Proline; Ion-solvent interaction

Introduction

Studies on densities (ρ) and viscosities (η) of electrolyte solutions are of great importance in characterizing the properties and structural aspects of solutions. The addition of an electrolyte to an aqueous organic solution alters the pattern of ion solvation and causes phenomenal changes in the behaviour of the dissolved electrolyte. Hence studies on the limiting apparent molar volume and viscosity B-coefficients of electrolyte provide us valuable information regarding ion-ion, ion-solvent and solvent-solvent interactions [1-3]. It has been found by a number of workers [4-6] that the addition of an electrolyte could either make or break the structure of a liquid. As the viscosity of a liquid depends on the intermolecular forces, the structural aspects of the liquid can be inferred from the viscosity of solutions at various electrolyte concentrations and temperature.

In this paper we have attempted to report the limiting apparent molar volume ( Equation), experimental slopes ( Equation ) and viscosity B-coefficients for potassium chloride, potassium bromide and potassium iodide in aqueous mixture of L-Proline at 298.15, 308.15 and 318.15 K. Since potassium ion being a common cation for all of the electrolytes under investigation, the present work enables us to have a qualitative comparison of the role of anion in aqueous L-Proline in terms of various derived parameters obtained from viscosity (η) and density (ρ) measurements.

Experimental Methods

Materials

L-Proline (SD. Fine Chemicals) was purified by standard methods [7]. The purity of the solvent was checked by measuring the viscosity (η) and density (ρ) at 298.15 K which was in good agreement with the literature values. Doubly distilled, degassed and deionised water with a specific conductance of 1 × 10-6/Ω/cm was used. Potassium chloride, potassium bromide and potassium iodide (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) were purified by re-crystallizing twice from conductivity water and then dried in a vacuum desiccator over P2O5 for 24 h before use. The experimental values of viscosity (η) and density (ρ) of aqueous mixtures of 0.01 M, 0.03 M and 0.05 M L-Proline at different temperatures are listed in Table 1.

Temperature (K)   ρ×10-3( kg/m) η(mPa.s)
0.01 M L-proline  
298.15 K   0.99753 0.909
308.15 K   0.99605 0.771
318.15 K   0.99466 0.639
0.03 M L-proline  
298.15 K   0.99902 0.916
308.15 K   0.99763 0.778
318.15 K   0.99604 0.645
0.05 M L-proline    
298.15 K   1.00045 0.923
308.15 K   0.99941 0.786
318.15 K   0.99772 0.652

Table 1: Density (ρ, kg/m) and viscosity (η, mPa.s) of aqueous mixtures of 0.01 M L-proline, 0.03 M L-proline, 0.05 M L-proline at different temperatures.

Apparatus and procedure

Densities (ρ) were measured with an Anton Paar density-meter (DMA 4500M) with a precision of 0.0005 g/cm3. The calibration was done by double-distilled water and dry air and uncertainty in density was ± 0.00005 g/cm.

The measurements were done in a thermostat bath controlled to ± 0.01 K. Viscosity (η) was measured by means of Brookfield DV-III Ultra Programmable Rheometer with spindle size-42 having an accuracy of 1.0% and fitted to a Brookfield Digital Bath TC-500 at 298 K using density and viscosity values from the literature [8-10]. The uncertainty in viscosity measurements is within ± 0.003 mPa s. The mixtures were prepared by mixing known volume of pure liquids in airtight-stopper bottles and each solution thus prepared was distributed into three recipients to perform all the measurements in triplicate, with the aim of determining possible dispersion of the results obtained. Adequate precautions were taken to minimize evaporation loses during the actual measurements.

The electrolyte solutions studied here were prepared by mass and the conversion of molality into molarity was accomplished [3] using experimental density values. The experimental values of concentrations (c), densities (ρ), viscosities (η), and derived parameters at various temperatures are reported in Table 2.

c(mol/dm3) ρ×10-3( kg/m) η
(mPa.s)
×106
( m3/mol )
(kg1/2 mol-1/2)
Potassium chloride in aqueous mixture 0.01 M L-proline        
298.15K        
0.0151 0.99804 0.918 40.7724 0.081
0.0302 0.99862 0.923 38.4219 0.089
0.0452 0.99924 0.927 36.6533 0.093
0.059 0.99985 0.931 35.1369 0.1
0.0752 1.00059 0.935 33.7388 0.104
0.0903 1.00132 0.938 32.4331 0.106
Potassium chloride in aqueous mixture 0.01 M L-proline        
308.15K        
0.0151 0.99651 0.779 44.1206 0.084
0.0302 0.99709 0.784 40.094 0.097
0.0452 0.99773 0.789 37.3202 0.11
0.059 0.99835 0.793 35.4719 0.117
0.0752 0.99914 0.798 33.3263 0.128
0.0903 0.99988 0.802 31.9725 0.134
Potassium chloride in aqueous mixture 0.01 M L-proline        
318.15K        
0.0151 0.99509 0.647 46.1479 0.102
0.0302 0.99565 0.653 41.7753 0.126
0.0452 0.99628 0.659 38.6617 0.147
0.059 0.99693 0.664 35.9803 0.161
0.0752 0.99774 0.67 33.4493 0.177
0.0903 0.99858 0.675 30.951 0.187
Potassium bromide in aqueous mixture 0.01 M L-proline        
298.15K        
0.0153 0.99853 0.922 53.5574 0.116
0.0303 0.99959 0.931 50.8657 0.139
0.0454 1.00071 0.94 48.7479 0.16
0.0607 1.00189 0.948 46.9048 0.174
0.0759 1.00311 0.957 45.1597 0.192
0.0912 1.00438 0.966 43.5138 0.208
Potassium bromide in aqueous mixture 0.01 M L-proline        
308.15K        
0.0153 0.99692 0.783 62.103 0.126
0.0303 0.99796 0.792 55.8276 0.156
0.0454 0.99911 0.801 51.3776 0.183
0.0607 1.00036 0.81 47.6963 0.205
0.0759 1.00168 0.819 44.4546 0.226
0.0912 1.00305 0.828 41.8137 0.245
Potassium bromide in aqueous mixture 0.01 M L-proline        
318.15K        
0.0153 0.99542 0.651 69.3779 0.152
0.0303 0.9964 0.661 61.4873 0.198
0.0454 0.99754 0.671 55.3595 0.235
0.0607 0.9988 0.681 50.4901 0.267
0.0759 1.00015 0.69 46.2727 0.29
0.0912 1.00162 0.701 42.2061 0.321
Potassium iodide in aqueous mixture 0.01 M L-proline        
298.15K        
0.0151 0.99887 0.926 77.1285 0.152
0.0302 1.00029 0.941 74.3642 0.203
0.0451 1.00175 0.955 72.0751 0.238
0.0604 1.00329 0.968 70.1716 0.264
0.0755 1.00486 0.982 68.3442 0.292
0.0906 1.00647 0.995 66.6517 0.314
Potassium iodide in aqueous mixture 0.01 M L-proline        
308.15K        
0.0151 0.99714 0.788 93.7994 0.179
0.0302 0.99851 0.803 84.3485 0.239
0.0451 1.00001 0.818 77.8489 0.287
0.0604 1.00168 0.833 72.2998 0.327
0.0755 1.00341 0.847 67.9012 0.359
0.0906 1.00525 0.861 63.7203 0.388
Potassium iodide in aqueous mixture 0.01 M L-proline        
318.15K        
0.0151 0.99559 0.656 104.5438 0.217
0.0302 0.99691 0.672 91.3819 0.297
0.0451 0.99839 0.688 82.9873 0.361
0.0604 1.0001 0.703 75.4455 0.408
0.0755 1.00189 0.718 69.5956 0.45
0.0906 1.00387 0.733 63.5555 0.489
Potassium chloride in aqueous mixture 0.03 M L-proline        
298.15K        
0.015 0.99921 0.923 61.945 0.062
0.0301 0.99949 0.927 58.9421 0.069
0.0451 0.99984 0.931 56.3604 0.077
0.0603 1.00027 0.935 53.7704 0.085
0.0754 1.00075 0.938 51.5348 0.087
0.0907 1.00137 0.942 48.5495 0.094
Potassium chloride in aqueous mixture 0.03 M L-proline        
308.15K        
0.0151 0.99772 0.785 68.7139 0.073
0.0301 0.99795 0.79 64.0361 0.089
0.0451 0.99829 0.795 59.9847 0.103
0.0603 0.99871 0.799 56.6853 0.11
0.0754 0.99924 0.804 53.2104 0.122
0.0907 0.99979 0.808 50.6903 0.128
Potassium chloride in aqueous mixture 0.03 M L-proline        
318.15K        
0.0151 0.99619 0.652 64.8067 0.088
0.0302 0.99659 0.658 56.4412 0.116
0.0451 0.99712 0.664 50.6549 0.139
0.0604 0.99784 0.669 44.7281 0.151
0.0756 0.99866 0.675 39.7752 0.169
0.0907 0.99964 0.679 34.7144 0.175
Potassium bromide in aqueous mixture 0.03 M L-proline        
298.15K        
0.015 0.99923 0.928 105.103 0.107
0.0301 0.99983 0.938 92.0902 0.138
0.0452 1.00074 0.947 80.857 0.159
0.0603 1.00193 0.956 70.5692 0.178
0.0754 1.00332 0.965 61.7272 0.195
0.0905 1.00486 0.975 54.1642 0.214
Potassium bromide in aqueous mixture 0.03 M L-proline        
308.15K        
0.0151 0.99774 0.79 111.9319 0.126
0.0302 0.99842 0.802 92.8868 0.178
0.0453 0.99948 0.812 78.0739 0.205
0.0604 1.00089 0.822 64.8203 0.23
0.0755 1.00258 0.832 53.1259 0.253
0.0906 1.00448 0.842 42.9908 0.273
Potassium bromide in aqueous mixture 0.03 M L-proline        
318.15K        
0.0151 0.99612 0.657 114.1186 0.152
0.0302 0.99691 0.669 90.3578 0.214
0.0453 0.99818 0.68 71.7285 0.255
0.0604 0.99985 0.691 55.7207 0.29
0.0755 1.00185 0.702 41.6985 0.322
0.0906 1.00412 0.713 29.3384 0.35
Potassium iodide in aqueous mixture 0.03 M L-proline        
298.15K        
0.0149 0.99928 0.934 148.643 0.161
0.0302 1.00032 0.95 122.8749 0.214
0.0456 1.0018 0.965 104.7895 0.251
0.0604 1.00356 0.98 90.4247 0.284
0.0755 1.00571 0.996 76.8781 0.318
0.0906 1.00802 1.012 66.0675 0.348
Potassium iodide in aqueous mixture 0.03 M L-proline        
308.15K        
0.0149 0.99781 0.796 154.2313 0.19
0.0302 0.99878 0.813 127.989 0.259
0.0456 1.00027 0.829 107.9414 0.307
0.0605 1.00225 0.845 89.2142 0.35
0.0756 1.00455 0.861 73.9113 0.388
0.0907 1.00701 0.879 61.9273 0.431
Potassium iodide in aqueous mixture 0.03 M L-proline        
318.15K        
0.0149 0.99612 0.663 161.2379 0.229
0.0302 0.99723 0.68 126.7934 0.312
0.0456 0.99899 0.697 101.1548 0.378
0.0605 1.00115 0.714 81.1575 0.435
0.0756 1.00374 0.731 63.5879 0.485
0.0907 1.00674 0.749 47.3012 0.535
Potassium chloride in aqueous mixture 0.05 M L-proline        
298.15 K        
0.0147 1.00058 0.931 66.192 0.071
0.0298 1.00085 0.937 61.6009 0.088
0.0449 1.00122 0.942 57.8579 0.097
0.0602 1.00167 0.947 54.712 0.106
0.0754 1.00215 0.952 52.421 0.114
0.0904 1.00271 0.957 49.9364 0.123
Potassium chloride in aqueous mixture 0.05 M L-proline        
308.15 K        
0.0147 0.99955 0.794 65.5701 0.084
0.0298 0.99998 0.8 55.9323 0.103
0.0449 1.00064 0.806 47.6291 0.12
0.0602 1.00141 0.812 41.7613 0.135
0.0754 1.00234 0.817 36.1032 0.144
0.0903 1.00348 0.823 29.8654 0.157
Potassium chloride in aqueous mixture 0.05 M L-proline        
318.15 K        
0.0147 0.99787 0.66 64.981 0.101
0.0298 0.99833 0.667 54.6447 0.133
0.0449 0.99899 0.674 46.7675 0.159
0.0603 0.99985 0.681 39.6604 0.181
0.0754 1.00089 0.688 32.9022 0.201
0.0904 1.00199 0.695 27.6887 0.219
Potassium bromide in aqueous mixture 0.05 M L-proline        
298.15 K        
0.0152 1.00061 0.935 108.4123 0.105
0.0304 1.00135 0.945 89.2875 0.137
0.0454 1.00251 0.954 73.4616 0.158
0.0605 1.00389 0.964 61.9252 0.181
0.0756 1.00556 0.974 51.1534 0.201
0.0907 1.00753 0.983 40.6693 0.216
Potassium bromide in aqueous mixture 0.05 M L-proline        
308.15 K        
0.0152 0.99958 0.798 107.8545 0.124
0.0304 1.00046 0.809 84.4013 0.168
0.0454 1.00177 0.82 66.8686 0.203
0.0605 1.00345 0.83 52.0043 0.228
0.0756 1.00542 0.841 39.243 0.254
0.0907 1.00756 0.851 28.872 0.275
Potassium bromide in aqueous mixture 0.05 M L-proline        
318.15 K        
0.0152 0.99789 0.664 108.0181 0.149
0.0304 0.99906 0.676 74.8907 0.211
0.0454 1.00072 0.687 52.7317 0.252
0.0605 1.00279 0.698 34.9094 0.287
0.0756 1.00533 0.709 18.0126 0.318
0.0907 1.00822 0.721 2.945 0.351
Potassium iodide in aqueous mixture 0.05 M L-proline        
298.15 K        
0.0146 1.00065 0.941 152.2114 0.161
0.0303 1.00155 0.959 129.5148 0.224
0.0452 1.00301 0.976 109.0648 0.27
0.0607 1.00488 0.993 92.6019 0.308
0.0759 1.00713 1.009 77.4794 0.338
0.0908 1.00958 1.025 64.8759 0.367
Potassium iodide in aqueous mixture 0.05 M L-proline        
308.15 K        
0.0146 0.99962 0.804 151.6684 0.19
0.0303 1.00072 0.823 122.6546 0.27
0.0452 1.00236 0.841 100.5065 0.329
0.0607 1.00433 0.859 84.5345 0.377
0.0759 1.00688 0.876 67.0643 0.416
0.0908 1.00963 0.893 52.8721 0.452
Potassium iodide in aqueous mixture 0.05 M L-proline        
318.15 K        
0.0146 0.99794 0.67 151.2114 0.228
0.0303 0.99944 0.69 109.1685 0.335
0.0453 1.00165 0.709 78.8492 0.411
0.0607 1.00446 0.728 54.4682 0.473
0.0759 1.00769 0.746 34.0835 0.523
0.0908 1.01154 0.764 13.2989 0.57

Table 2: The concentration (c), density (ρ), viscosity (η), apparent molar volume and of potassium chloride, potassium bromide and potassium iodide in different aqueous mixtures 0.01M L-proline , 0.03M L-proline, 0.05M L-proline at different temperatures.

Results and Discussion

Density calculation

The apparent molar volumes (Equation ) were determined from the solution densities using the following Equation [3]:

Equation

Where M is the molar mass of the solute, c is the molarity of the solution; ρ0 and ρ are the densities of the solvent and the solution respectively. The limiting apparent molar volumes Equation was calculated using a least-squares treatment to the plots of Equationversus √c using the following Masson equation [11]:

Equation

Where ( Equation) is the apparent molar volume at infinite dil ution and ( Equation) is the experimental slope. The plots of (Equation ) against square root of molar concentration (√c) were found to be linear as depicted graphically in Figures 1-9 with negative slopes. Values of Equationand Equation are reported in Table 3.

thermodynamics-catalysis-molar-volume

Figure 1: The apparent molar volume (φV ) and the square root of concentrations (√c) for potassium chloride in different aqueous mixtures 0.01 M L-Proline at 298.15 K (—♦—), 308.15 K (—■—) and 318.15 K (—▲—).

thermodynamics-catalysis-molar-volume

Figure 2: The apparent molar volume (φV ) and the square root of concentrations (√c) for potassium chloride in different aqueous mixtures 0.01 M L-Proline at 298.15 K (—♦—), 308.15 K (—■—) and 318.15 K (—▲—).

thermodynamics-catalysis-molar-volume

Figure 3: The apparent molar volume (φV ) and the square root of concentrations (√c) for potassium chloride in different aqueous mixtures 0.01 M L-Proline at 298.15 K (—♦—), 308.15 K (—■—) and 318.15 K (—▲—).

thermodynamics-catalysis-molar-volume

Figure 4: The apparent molar volume (φV ) and the square root of concentrations (√c) for potassium bromide in different aqueous mixtures 0.01 M L-Proline at 298.15 K (—♦—), 308.15 K (—■—) and 318.15 K (—▲—).

thermodynamics-catalysis-molar-volume

Figure 5: The apparent molar volume (φV ) and the square root of concentrations (√c) for potassium bromide in different aqueous mixtures 0.01 M L-Proline at 298.15 K (—♦—), 308.15 K (—■—) and 318.15 K (—▲—).

thermodynamics-catalysis-molar-volume

Figure 6: The apparent molar volume (φV ) and the square root of concentrations (√c) for potassium bromide in different aqueous mixtures 0.01 M L-Proline at 298.15 K (—♦—), 308.15 K (—■—) and 318.15 K (—▲—).

thermodynamics-catalysis-molar-volume

Figure 7: The apparent molar volume (φV ) and the square root of concentrations (√c) for potassium iodide in different aqueous mixtures 0.01 M L-Proline at 298.15 K (—♦—), 308.15 K (—■—) and 318.15 K (—▲—).

thermodynamics-catalysis-molar-volume

Figure 8: The apparent molar volume (φV ) and the square root of concentrations (√c) for potassium iodide in different aqueous mixtures 0.01 M L-Proline at 298.15 K (—♦—), 308.15 K (—■—) and 318.15 K (—▲—).

thermodynamics-catalysis-molar-volume

Figure 9: The apparent molar volume (φV ) and the square root of concentrations (√c) for potassium iodide in different aqueous mixtures 0.01 M L-Proline at 298.15 K (—♦—), 308.15 K (—■—) and 318.15 K (—▲—).

Molarity of L-Proline (m3/mol) (m2/mol3/2 L1/2)
298.15 K 308.15 K 318.15 K 298.15 K 308.15 K 318.15 K
0.01 46.56 52.19 56.59 -46.89 -68.46 -84.87
0.03 71.52 81.51 85.63 -73.76 -102.01 -167.33
0.05 77.16 89.67 90.59 -90.67 -196.92 -208.7
Potassium bromide
0.01 60.6 75.84 87.98 -56.09 -113.71 -151.83
0.03 141.42 160.01 173.02 -288.91 -388.12 -477.11
0.05 155.11 162.3 178.49 -379.72 -446.42 -584.88
Potassium iodide
0.01 84.48 113.9 131.59 -58.75 -168.01 -227.4
0.03 203.81 218.21 237.49 -460.91 -521.5 -634.07
0.05 212.82 217.51 241.73 -489.42 -545.32 -758.61

Table 3: Limiting apparent molar volumes ( ) and experimental slopes ( ) of potassium chloride, potassium bromide and potassium iodide in different aqueous mixtures 0.01M L-proline , 0.03M L-proline, 0.05M L-proline at different temperatures.

In these systems the ion-solvent and ion-ion interactions can be interpreted in terms of structural changes between various components of the solvent and solution systems. Equationcan be used to interpret ionsolvent interactions. A perusal of Table 3 reveals that the Equation values are positive and increase with a rise in both the temperature and amount of L-Proline in the mixtures. This indicates the presence of strong ionsolvent interactions and these interactions are further strengthened at higher temperatures and higher molar mass of L-Proline in the mixtures, suggesting larger electrostriction at higher temperatures and in enhanced amount of L-Proline.

A perusal of Table 3 also reveals that the Equation values are negative for all the solutions at all the experimental temperatures and Equation values decrease as the experimental temperature and amount of L-Proline in the mixtures increases. Since Equation is a measure of ion-ion interactions, the results indicate the presence of weak ion-ion interactions in the solutions at all the experimental temperatures and these interactions further decrease with a rise in temperature and increase in molar mass L-Proline in the mixtures. In other words, it may be said that the solvation of electrolyte/ions increases with the increase of L-Proline content in water. This is probably due to more violent thermal agitation at higher temperatures, resulting in diminishing the force of ion-ion interactions (ionic-dissociation) [12]. This suggests that ion-solvent interactions dominate over ion-ion interactions in all the solutions and at all experimental temperatures.

The variation of Equation with temperature of potassium chloride, potassium bromide and potassium iodide in aqueous mixture of LProline follows the polynomial,

Equation

Over the temperature range under study where T is the temperature in K. Values of coefficients of the above equation for potassium chloride, potassium bromide and potassium iodide in aqueous mixture of L- Proline are reported in Table 4.

Molarity of L-proline a0( m3/mol) a1( m3/mol/K) a2(m3/mol/K)
Potassium chloride
0.01 -686.321 4.2917 -0.0062
0.03 -2922.861 18.7939 -0.0293
0.05 -5619.977 36.3861 -0.0579
Potassium bromide
0.01 -1817.842 10.9216 -0.0155
0.03 -2976.151 18.7747 -0.0279
0.05 4075.112 -26.5645 0.0451
Potassium iodide
0.01 -6181.141 38.5014 -0.0586
0.03 2016.222 -13.3537 0.0244
0.05 9044.573 -58.7362 0.0976

Table 4: Values of the coefficients of Eq. (4) for potassium chloride, potassium bromide and potassium iodide in different aqueous mixtures 0.01 M L-proline, 0.03 M L-proline, 0.05M L-proline at different temperatures.

The apparent molar expansibilities (Equation ) can be obtained by the following equation:

Equation

The values of Equationfor different solutions of the studied electrolytes at 298.15, 308.15 and 318.15 K are reported in Table 5. From the table it is evident that the values of Equation for potassium chloride increases with the increase in the amount of L- Proline in the mixture. However, for potassium bromide and potassium iodide the Equationvalues were found to be rather complicated to explain. During the past few years it has been emphasized by a number of workers that Equation is not the sole criterion for determining the structure making or breaking tendency of any solute. Hepler [13] developed a technique of examining the sign of Equation for the solute in terms of long-range structure-making and breaking capacity of the electrolytes in the mixed solvent systems. The general thermodynamic expression used is as follows

Molarity of L-Proline   (m3/mol)   (m3/mol/k)
  298.15 K 308.15 K 308.15 K  
Potassium chloride
0.01 0.0595 0.47064 0.34664 -0.0124
0.03 1.3223 1.7363 0.34664 -0.0586
0.05 1.8603 0.7023 0.4556 -0.1158
Potassium bromide
0.01 1.6789 1.3690 1.0589 -0.0310
0.03 2.1379 1.5799 1.0220 -0.0558
0.05 0.3286 1.2306 2.1326 0.0902
Potassium iodide
0.01 3.5582 2.3862 1.2142 -0.1172
0.03 1.1960 1.6840 2.1720 0.0488
0.05 -0.5373 1.4146 3.3666 0.1952

Table 5: Limiting partial molar expansibilities for potassium chloride, potassium bromide and potassium iodide in different aqueous mixtures 0.01 M L-proline , 0.03 M L-proline, 0.05 M L-proline at different temperatures.

Equation

If the sign of Equation is positive or small negative [14,15] the electrolyte is a structure maker and when the sign of Equation is negative, it is a structure breaker. As is evident from Table 5, the electrolyte under investigation generally acts as a structure breaker.

The viscosity data of solutions for the electrolytes in 0.01 M, 0.03M, 0.05M L-Proline have been analyzed using Jones-Dole [16] equation:

Where η0 and η are the viscosities of the solvent and solution respectively. A and B are the constants estimated by least square method and are reported in Table 6. From the table it is evident that the values of the A-coefficient are very small for all the solutions under investigation at all experimental temperatures. These results indicate the presence of weak ion-ion interactions, and these interactions further decrease with both rise of experimental temperatures and amount of L-Proline suggesting an increase in ion-solvation. Interestingly, values are found to be smallest for Potassium iodide and hence it may be concluded that solubility in aqueous L-Proline solutions is maximum for Potassium iodide and minimum for Potassium chloride.

Molarity of L-proline B-coefficient(dm3/2/mol1/2) A-coefficient( dm3/mol)
  298.15 K 308.15 K 318.15 K 298.15 K 308.15 K 318.15 K
Potassium chloride
0.01 0.149 0.283 0.488 0.062 0.048 0.042
0.03 0.179 0.308 0.496 0.039 0.035 0.029
0.05 0.278 0.403 0.658 0.038 0.034 0.02
Potassium bromide
0.01 0.511 0.669 0.938 0.05 0.041 0.035
0.03 0.588 0.81 1.103 0.034 0.031 0.019
0.05 0.625 0.849 1.116 0.027 0.019 0.013
Potassium iodide
0.01 0.903 1.177 1.525 0.043 0.035 0.031
0.03 1.037 1.325 1.706 0.032 0.026 0.016
0.05 1.137 1.451 1.889 0.025 0.016 0.004

Table 6: Values of A and B coefficients for potassium chloride, potassium bromide and potassium iodide in different aqueous mixtures 0.01M L-proline , 0.03M L-proline, 0.05M L-proline at different temperatures.

The effects of ion-solvent interactions on the solution viscosity can be inferred from the B-coefficient [17,18]. The viscosity B-coefficient is a valuable tool to provide information concerning the solvation of the solutes and their effects on the structure of the solvent. From Table 6 it is evident that the values of the B-coefficient of potassium chloride, potassium bromide and potassium iodide in the studied solvent systems are more positive than A-coefficients, thereby suggesting the presence of strong ion-solvent interactions, and these types of interactions are strengthened with a rise in both temperature and amount of L-Proline in solutions. These conclusions are in excellent agreement with those drawn from values Equationdiscussed earlier. It has been reported in a number of studies [19,20] that dB/dT is a better criterion for determining the structure-making/breaking nature of any solute rather than simply the value of the B-coefficient. It is found from Table 6 that the values of the B-coefficient increase with a rise in temperature (positive dB/dT) suggesting the structure-breaking tendency of potassium chloride, potassium bromide and potassium iodide in the solvent systems.

Conclusion

Extensive study of potassium chloride, potassium bromide and potassium iodide in aqueous mixture of L- Proline reveals that potassium iodide is more associated in L-Proline than the other two halides. The ion-association is found minimum in the case of potassium chloride in L- Proline. The said interaction of potassium bromide arises in the intermediacy of potassium iodide and potassium chloride. The present study reveals the predominance of ion-solvent interaction over the ion-ion interaction in all the solution under investigation.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the UGC supported Major research project, Ref. No. RP/5032/FCS/2011 New Delhi for financial support in order to continue this research work.

One of the authors, Prof. M. N. Roy is thankful to University Grant Commission, New Delhi, Government of India for being awarded one time grant under Basic Scientific Research via the grant-in-Aid No. F.4-10/2010 (BSR) regarding his active service for augmenting of research facilities to facilitate further research work.

References

  1. McDowaliJM, Vincent CA (1974) Viscosity behaviour of some simple electrolytes in formamide solution. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 1: 1862-1868.
  2. DackMRJ, Bird KJ, Parker AJ (1975) Solvation of ions XXV Partial molal volumes of single ions inprotic and dipolar aprotic solvents. Aust J Chem 28: 955-963
  3. Roy MN, SinhaB, DeyR, SinhaA (2005) Solute-Solvent and Solute-Solute Interactions of Resorcinol in Mixed 1,4-Dioxane-Water Systems at Different Temperatures.Int J Thermophys 26: 1549-1563
  4. Stokes RH, Mills R (1965) IntEncyclopedia of Physical Chemistry and Chemical Physics.
  5. NikamPS, Mehdi H (1988) Ultrasonic velocity and adiabatic compressibility of monochloroacetic acid in aqueous ethanol at various temperatures. J Chem Eng Data 33: 165-169
  6. Perrin DD, Amarego WLF (1966) Purification of Laboratory Chemicals(4thedn.)Reed Educational and Professional Publishing Ltd
  7. SinhaB, DakuaVK, Roy MN (2007) Apparent Molar Volumes and Viscosity B-Coefficients of Some Amino Acids in Aqueous Tetramethylammonium Iodide Solutions at 29815 K. J Chem Eng Data 52: 1768-1772
  8. Dean JA(1973) Lange’s Handbook of Chemistry (11thedn.) McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York
  9. Chatterjee BD (2006) Electrical Conductances of Tetrabutylammonium Bromide, Sodium Tetraphenylborate, and Sodium Bromide in Methanol (1) + Water (2) Mixtures at (29815, 30815, and 31815) K.J Chem Eng Data 51: 1352-1355
  10. Millero FJ (1972) Structure and Transport Process in Water and Aqueous Solutions, RAHorne, New York
  11. Hepler LG (1969) Thermal expansion and structure in water and aqueous solutions Can. J Chem 47: 4613-4617
  12. Sarkar BK, Sinha B, Roy MN (2008) Ion-solvent and ion-ion interactions of sodium molybdate and sodium tungstate in mixtures of acetonitrile and water at 29815, 30815, and 31815 K. Russ J Phys Chem 82: 960-966
  13. Parmar ML, Banyal DS (2005) Effect of temperature on the partial molar volumes of some bivalent transition metal nitrates and magnesium nitrate in DMF + water mixtures Indian. J Chem 44 A: 1582-1588
  14. Jones G, Dole M(1929)The viscosity of aqueous solutions of strong electrolytes with special reference to barium chloride. J Am ChemSoc 51: 2950-2964
  15. Millero FJ, Lo Surdo A, Shin C(1978) The apparent molal volumes and adiabatic compressibilities of aqueous amino acids at 25°C.J PhysChem 82: 784-792
  16. Gopal R, Siddiqi MA (1969) Variation of partial molar volume of some tetra-alkylammonium iodides with temperature in aqueous solutions. J Phys Chem 72: 1814-1817
Citation: Roy MN, Sikdar PS, De P (2015) Exploration of Solution Behaviour of Potassium Halides in Mixtures of L- Proline and Water at 298.15, 308.15 and 318.15 K. J Thermodyn Catal 6: 142.

Copyright: © 2015 Roy MN, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top