Journal of Clinical Toxicology

Journal of Clinical Toxicology
Open Access

ISSN: 2161-0495

+44 1478 350008

Research Article - (2016) Volume 6, Issue 2

GC-MS Analysis and Evaluation of Mutagenic and Antimutagenic Activity of Ethyl Acetate Extract of Ajuga bracteosa Wall ex. Benth: An Endemic Medicinal Plant of Kashmir Himalaya, India

Hilal Ahmad Ganaie1,2, Md. Niamat Ali1*, Bashir A Ganai2, Jasbir Kaur1 and Mudasar Ahmad2
1Cytogenetic and Molecular Biology Research Laboratory, Centre of Research for Development (CORD), University of Kashmir, Srinagar-190 006, J & K,, India
2Phytochemistry Research Laboratory, Centre of Research for Development (CORD), University of Kashmir, Srinagar-190 006, J & K, India
*Corresponding Author: Md. Niamat Ali, Cytogenetic and Molecular Biology Research Laboratory, Centre of Research for Development (CORD), University of Kashmir, Srinagar-190 006, J & K, India Email:

Abstract

Herbal medicines as the major remedy in traditional system of medicine have been used in medical practices since antiquity. The natural products remain an important source of new drugs, new drug leads and new chemical entities. The ethyl acetate extract of Ajuga bracteosa was evaluated for mutagenic and antimutagenic assay against mice pre-treated with 1/4th LD50 (117.5 mg/kg bw) of ethyl methane sulphonate by micronucleus and chromosomal aberration assay. Mice were treated with ethyl acetate extract of Ajuga bracteosa (Ab-EAE) (100, 200 300 & 400 mg/kg bw) for 30 days. Without the doses of EMS, no mutagenic effects were observed in blood and bone marrow samples of the mice. But Ab-EAE showed antimutagenic effects on EMS induced mutagenicity in mice. It was observed that high doses of Ab-EAE showed protective effects. The reduction profiles in the EMS induction MN at concentration of ethyl acetate extract of Ajuga bracteosa (100, 200, 300 and 400 mg/kg bw) were estimated as 2%, 4.9%, 16.4% and 20.7% respectively. It can be concluded from the study that ethyl acetate extract of Ajuga bracteosa exhibited no mutagenic effects but only possessing antimutagenic effects. This antimutagenic activity is an induction of medicinal relevance.

Keywords: Ajuga, Antimutagenicity, EMS, Micronucleus, GC-MS

Introduction

Traditional herbal medicine practitioners have described the therapeutic effectiveness of many indigenous plants [1]. The plants are the source of synthetic and traditional herbal medicine and hence are useful for healing and curing of human diseases because of the presence of phytochemical constituents [2-4]. These phytochemicals are naturally present in all parts of medicinal plants viz., leaves, vegetables and roots. The Phytochemicals are synthesized by a plant itself as primary and secondary metabolites. Chlorophyll, proteins and common sugars are included in primary constituents while as terpenoids, alkaloids and phenolic compounds come under secondary compounds [5]. Terpenoids and phenols exhibit various important pharmacological activities viz., anti-inflammatory, anticancer, antimalarial, anti-viral, anti-bacterial activities and inhibition of cholesterol synthesis [6]. Alkaloids are known to possess anesthetic properties [7,8].

The pharmacological and therapeutic properties of traditionally used medicinal plants are attributed to various chemical constituents isolated from their crude extracts [9-11]. It is very common among the people who live in upper reaches of Kashmir Himalaya to use herbs for curing of various diseases [12]. Although the diversity of plant species in Kashmiri Himalayas is a potential source of biologically active compounds, the effects on human health and genetic material are often unknown. Interest in such popular usage has recently gained strength, through recent knowledge that chemicals, such as proteases and antioxidants may prevent or reduce the development of cancer by blocking genetic damage [13-15].

Ajuga bracteosa Wall ex. Benth of family Lamiaceae is commonly known as ‘Bungle’ in English and ‘Jan-i-adam’ in Kashmiri. It is a perennial erect, ascending hairy herb, often prostrates with oblanceolate or sub-spathulate leaves and grows up to 5-50 cm tall. It is found along roadsides, open slopes, and rock cervices [16,17]. Its distribution extends from temperate regions of Western Himalayas viz., Kashmir, Pakistan, Afghanistan and China to Bhutan in Eastern Himalayas; Indian subtropical regions [18] viz., plains of Punjab and upper Gangetic plains at an altitude of 1300 m [19] and in tropical regions of Malaysia. In Pakistan, it is found in northern hilly areas, where in local Hindi/Punjabi language it is called kori booti (means bitter herb) owing to its bitter taste. The plant is effectively used for the treatment of gout, rheumatism, palsy, jaundice, hypertension, sore throat and as a blood purifier. Locally, the leaves are used to cure headache, pimples, measles, stomach acidity, burns and boils.

Materials And Method

Collection and air drying of plant material

Aerial parts of Ajuga bracteosa were collected from Sinthan Top area of District Anantnag (Kashmir) in the month July, 2013. The plant was identified at the Centre of Biodiversity and Plant Taxonomy, Department of Botany, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, J & K and a voucher specimen (JKASH/CBT/226 Dated 08. 08. 2014) was deposited there. The parts were allowed to dry under shade (30°C) for 8-10 days.

Preparation of extracts

After shade drying, the aerial parts were macerated to fine powder, 1 kg of leaves were extracted successively with hexane for defatenning and methanol for 16 h using Soxhlet apparatus. The extracts were filtered through a Buchner funnel using Whatman No.1 filter paper, and all the extracts were concentrated to dryness under vacuum using a Heidolph rotary evaporator, yielding hexane, ethyl acetate, methanol and aqueous crude extracts of 65, 52, 46 and 36 g respectively. All the extracts were stored at 4°C in air tight glass bottles before use.

Phytochemical screening

Chemical tests were carried out on the extracts using standard procedures to identify various constituents like Tannin, saponin, flavonoids, steroids, terpenoids, glucosides, alkaloids, carbohydrates, phytosterols, phenol, proteins and amino acids [20-23].

GC-MS analysis

GC-MS analysis was carried out with GCMS-QP2010 Plus, Shimadzu, Japan fitted with programmable head space auto sampler and auto injector. The capillary column used was DB-1/RTX-MS (30 metre) with helium as a carrier gas, at a flow rate of 3 mL/min with 1 μL injection volume. Samples were analysed with the column held initially at 100°C for 2 min after injection, then increased to 170°C with 10°C/min heating ramp without hold and increased to 215°C with 5°C/min heating ramp for 8 min. Then the final temperature was increased to 240°C with 10°C/min heating ramp for 15 min. The injections were performed in split mode (30:1) at 250°C. Detector and injector temperatures were 260°C and 250°C, respectively. Pressure was established as 76.2 kPa and the sample was run for 70 min. Temperature and nominal initial flow for flameionization detector (FID) were set as 230°C and 3.1 mL/min, correspondingly. MS parameters were as follows: scan range (m/z): 40-650 atomic mass units (AMU) under the electron impact (EI) ionization (70 eV). The constituent compounds were determined by comparing their retention times and mass weights with those of authentic samples obtained by GC and as well as the mass spectra from the Wiley libraries and National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) database.

Animals and treatments

Both sex of albino mice, Balb/c strain useful for research in cancer and immunology, weighing 25-35 g were obtained from the Indian Institute of Integrative Medicine (IIM), Canal Road Jammu, kept in plastic cages in an experimental room under controlled conditions of temperature (22 ± 2°C), humidity (55 ± 10%), 12 h light/dark cycles and access to food and water. They were randomized at the beginning of the experiment. The study design was approved by the Institutional Animal Ethical Committee, and the experiments undertaken in accordance with the ethical principles of the CPCSEA norms. The mice were divided into 8 groups, with 5 animals per group (Table 1). Ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS, Sigma Aldrich) was used to induce mutations and chromosomal aberrations for antimutagenic evaluation of ethyl acetate extract of Ajuga bracteosa .

Group Dose Purpose of group Duration
Group 1 Distilled water Negative control 15 days
Group 2 1/4th LD50 EMS Positive control EMS 24 h
Group 3 Ab-EAE 100 mg/kg bw Positive control Ajugabracteosa 24 h
Group 4 Ab-EAE 400 mg/kg bw Positive control Ajugabracteosa 24 h
Group 5 Ab-EAE 100 mg/kg bw + EMS Treated Group 30 days
Group 6 Ab-EAE 200 mg/kg bw + EMS Treated Group 30 days
Group 7 Ab-EAE 300 mg/kg bw + EMS Treated Group 30 days
Group 8 Ab-EAE 400 mg/kg bw + EMS Treated Group 30 days

Table 1: Grouping, dose (distilled water, EMS and Ab-ME in concentrations of 100, 200, 300 and 400 mg/kg bw) and duration of experiment. Ab- EAE=Ethyl acetate extract of Ajuga bracteosa .

The micronucleus test

The method of MacGregor et al. was used for micronucleus test. Mice were injected intraperitoneal with 0. 5 ml of 0.06% colchicine and two hours later, mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. Slides were prepared with blood collected from the jugular vein. The slides were air-dried, fixed in absolute methanol, stained in 10% Giemsa and then coded for blind analysis. One thousand polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) were analysed per mouse. The proportion of PCE and normochromatic erythrocytes (NCE) in 200 erythrocytes/animal was calculated, to detect possible cytotoxic effects. The slides were scored blindly, using a light microscope with a 65x objectives.

Chromosomal aberration

Both the femurs were fleshed out from the muscles and kept in HBSS (Hank’s balanced salt solution). The femurs were then rinsed with 3 ml 0.056% KCl solution in a centrifuge tube. The tube was then incubated at 37°C for 20 minutes. After incubation, centrifugation at 800 rpm for 4 minutes was carried out. Supernatant was discarded and fresh Carnoy’s fixative was added (3:1methanol: acetic acid). The process of centrifugation was repeated three times. Then slides were prepared, stained with 4% Giemsa, air dried and studied under compound microscope.

Results

Phytochemical screening

Therapeutic values of medicinal and aromatic plants (MAPs) are due to the presence of major bioactive constituents like alkaloids, phenolics, flavonoids, tannins, cardiac glycosides, terpenes, saponins, steroids etc. The phytochemical investigation of Ajuga bracteosa extracts in the present study revealed presence of different active ingredients (secondary plant metabolites) like flavonoids, phenolics, alkaloids, tannins, cardiac glycosides, terpenes, saponins, steroids, carbohydrates, amino acids and proteins as shown in Table 2. It supports the resourcefulness of the plant extract.

Phytoconstituents Test Result
Alkaloids Wagner’s test + +
Phenolics phenol test + +
Tannins Ferric chloride test + +
Cardiac glycosides Keller-Killani test + +
Terpenes Salkwaski’s test +
Flavonoids Shinoda’s test + +
Saponins Frothing test +
Steroids Libermann-Buchard’s test +
Carbohydrates Molish test + +
Proteins Biuret test +
Polysterols Salkowski’s Test +
Amino acids Ninhydrin Test +

Table 2: Qualitative phytochemical screening of Ajuga bracteosa . (++) = strong presence, (+) = moderate presence

GC-MS analysis

In order to find out the phytocomponents responsible for antimutagenic activity, ethyl acetate fraction of Ajuga bracteosa was subjected to GC-MS analysis. The active principals present in the ethyl acetate fraction of Ajuga bracteosa along with their retention time (RT), molecular formula, molecular weight (MW) and peak area (%) are presented in Table 3. The chromatogram of Ab-ME showed six major peaks (Figure 1): 1, 2, 3-Propanetriol (18.15%), 1, 2, 3- Propanetriol, 1-acetate (11.35%), Stigmast-5-en-3-ol (11.35%), 2, 6, 10- Trimethyl, 14-ethylene-14-pentadecane (8.51%), 2-Hexadecene-1-ol, 3, 7, 11, 15-tetramethyl-, [R-[R (5.76%) and l-(+)-Ascorbic acid 2, 6- dihexadecanoate (4.75%) comprising 59.87% of total peak area.

S. No. Compound Retention time % Area Molecular formula Molecular weight
1 1, 2, 3-propanetriol 5.7 18.15 C3H8O3 92
2 1,2,3-Propanetriol, 1-acetate 7.47 11.35 C5H10O4 134
3 1,2,3-Propanetriol, 1-acetate 8.5 0.77 C5H10O4 134
4 1,2,3-Propanetriol, 1-acetate 11.12 0.94 C5H10O4 144
5 2,3-Dihydroxypropyl acetate 11.23 0.45 C5H10O4 134
6 1,2,3-Propanetriol, 1-acetate 14.42 0.59 C5H10O4 134
7 2(4H)-Benzofuranone, 5,6,7,7A-tetrahydro-6-H 24.04 0.83 C11H16O3 196
8 (2E)-3, 7, 11, 15- Tetramethyl-2-Hexadecane 25. 08 0.24 C20H40 280
9 2, 6, 10- Trimethyl, 14- Ethylene-14-Pentadecne 25.19 8.51 C20H38 278
10 Acetic acid, 3, 7, 11, 15- Tetramethyl-hexadecyl ester 25.32 0.8 C22H44O2 340
11 2-Hexadecen-1-ol, 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-, [R-[R 25.7 2.82 C20H40O 296
12 2-Hexadecen-1-ol, 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-, [R-[R 26.07 4.37 C20H40O 296
13 Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester 26.89 0.42 C17H34O2 270
14 1-Hexadecne-3-ol, 3, 5, 11, 15-Tetramethyl 27.29 0.24 C20H40O 296
15 l- (+)- Ascorbic acid 2, 6-dihexadecanoate 27.69 4.75 C38H68O8 652
16 Hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester 28.01 0.78 C18H36O2 284
17 9, 12-Octadecenoic acid (Z, Z)-, methyl ester 29.44 0.23 C19H34O2 294
18 9, 12, 15-Octadecenoic acid, methyl ester, (Z, Z, Z)-, 29.53 0.78 C19H32O2 292
19 2-Hexadecen-1-ol, 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-, [R-[R 29.7 5.76 C20H40O 296
20 9,12, 15-Octadecatrienoic acid, (Z,Z,Z)- 30.19 1.55 C18H30O2 278
21 Ethyl (9Z, 12Z)-9, 12-Octadecadienoate 30.35 1.05 C20H36O2 308
22 Octadecanamide 30.6 0.15 C18H37NO 283
23 Phytol, acetate 30.9 0.88 C22H42O2 338
24 1-Chloroheptacosane 31.72 0.48 C27H55Cl 414
25 9-Hexadecanoic acid, 9-Octadecenyl Ester, (Z) 31.88 0.19 C34H64O2 504
26 13-Octadecenal, (Z) 31.97 0.73 C18H34O 266
27 Cyclohexane, Decyl- 32.19 0.43 C16H32 224
28 1-Heptacosanol 32.43 0.27 C27H56O 396
29 1-Henicosanol 32.64 0.36 C21H44O 312
30 1, 3, 5- Trisilacyclohexane 33.42 0.26 C3H12Si3 132
31 Octadecanal 33.87 0.5 C18H36O 268
32 1, 2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid 34.06 0.62 C24H38O4 390
33 Eicosanoic acid, 2-(acetyloxy)-1-[(acetyloxy)methyl] ethyl ester 34.6 0.9 C27H50O6 470
34 1,3-Dioxolane, 4-[(2-Methoxy-4-Hexadecenyl) 34.95 0.14 C23H44O4 384
35 Heneicosane 35.31 0.16 C21H44 296
36 14-Beta-H-Pregna 35.74 0.19 C21H36 288
37 1-(3,4-dimethoxybenzyl)-6,7-Dimethoxy-2-Meth 35.95 0.44 C21H27NO4 357
38 E, Z-1, 3, 12-Nonadecatriene 36.39 0.62 C19H34 262
39 Methyl (Z)-5, 11, 14, 17-Eicosatetraenoate 36.51 0.62 C21H34O2 318
40 Tetracontane 37.61 2.12 C40H82 562
41 2-Pentatriacontanone 39.66 1.3 C35H70O 506
42 Protopine 40.29 0.59 C20H19NO5 353
43 1, 54- Dibromotetrapentacontane 41.1 1.35 C54H108Br2 914
44 Stigmast-5-en-3-ol, (3.beta.)- 41.48 0.57 C29H50O 414
45 Vitamin E 42.05 0.61 C29H50O2 430
46 Octacosyl acetate 43.54 0.48 C30H60O2 452
47 Ergosta-5, 24-dien-3-ol, (3 beta) 44.39 0.22 C28H46O 398
48 Ergost-5-en-3-ol, (3 beta) 44.59 1.32 C28H46O 400
49 Octadecanoic acid, octadecyl ester 45.88 0.31 C36H72O2 536
50 Stigmast-5-en-3-ol, (3.beta.)- 47.18 11.35 C29H50O 414
51 Cholest-5-en-3-ol, 24-propylidene-, (3 beta) 47.69 1.27 C30H50O 426
52 9, 19-Cyclocholeatan-3-ol, 14-methyl- (3 beta) 48.34 0.91 C28H48O 400
53 9, 19-Cyclolanost-24-en-3-ol (3 beta) 49.6 0.52 C30H50O 426
54 Stigmast-5-en-3-ol, oleate 51.71 3.01 C47H82O2 678
55 2, 6, 10- Trimethyl, 14-Ethylene-14-Pentadecne 56.47 0.74 C20H38 278

Table 3: Phytocomponents identified in the ethyl acetate fraction of Ajuga bracteosa (Ab-EAE) by GC-MS.

clinical-toxicology-Ethyl-acetate

Figure 1: GC-MS chromatogram of Ethyl acetate extract of Ajuga bracteosa .

Micronucleus test

According to MN testing of mouse blood cells the low frequencies of micronucleated cells presumes the meagre effects of ethyl acetate extract of Ajuga bracteosa (Ab-EAE ) 100 and 400 mg/kg (Table 4), there by indicating the virtual absence of mutagenic effect. In other words, nonstatistically significant difference in the frequency of MN polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) or the ratio of PCE to normochromatic erythrocytes (NCE), between the negative control and thegroups that ingested extracts could be detected.

  Treatment Total No. of cells analysed per mice No. of cells with micronuclei % age of MN % Reduction P value
Group 1 Negative Control (Distilled water) 1000 2.35 ± 0.12      
Group 2 Positive control (EMS) 1000 7.23 ± 0.89     0.05*
Group 3 Ab- EAE 100 mg/kg bw 1000 2.32 ± 0.08      
Group 4 Ab- EAE 400 mg/kg bw 1020 2.30 ± 0.05      
Group 5 Ab- EAE 100 mg/kg + EMS 1000 7.09  ± 0.76 98 2  
Group 6 Ab-EAE 200 mg/kg + EMS 1000 6.88 ± 0.54 95.1 4.9 0.05*
Group 7 Ab-EAE 300 mg/kg + EMS 1000 6.05 ± 0.45 83.6 16.4 0.05*
Group 8 Ab-EAE 400 mg/kg + EMS 1000 5.74 ± 0.35 79.3 20.7 0.05*

Table 4: Effects of Ethyl Acetate Extract of Ajuga bracteosa on MNPCE frequencies (mean ± SD) in mice, induced with ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS) 117.5 mg/kg bw (1/4th LD50). Ab-EAE = Ethyl Acetate extract of Ajuga bracteosa

When evaluating antimutagenicity in Ab-EAE, a significant decrease in the frequency of EMS-induced MN PCE was observed only in mice that had received 100, 200, 300 and 400 mg/kg of Ab-EAE (p=0.05). In the present study, the ethyl acetate extract of A. bracteosa showed antimutagenic activities by reducing the % age of micronuclei with increase in the dose of the extract (Table 4 and Figure 2). The number of cells with micronuclei also decreased with increase in the dose of the extract i.e., from 100 mg/kgbw to 400 mg/kgbw (Figure 3).

clinical-toxicology-reduction-EMS

Figure 2: % age reduction in EMS treated micronuclei with increase in concentration ethyl acetate extract of Ajuga bracteosa

clinical-toxicology-micronucleated-cells

Figure 3: Number of micronucleated cells in different groups of mice treated with EMS alone, EMS + Ab-EAE and Ab-EAE alone in different concentrations.

Chromosomal aberration

Chromosomal aberration frequencies observed after various treatment schedules with EMS and different doses of Ab-EAE is shown in Table 5. The chromosomal aberrations decreased from 25.09% in EMS induced cells to 20.59%, 16.50%, 12.63% and 8.27% at 100, 200, 300 and 400 mg/kg bw of the ethyl acetate extract of Ajuga bracteosa (Figure 4). EMS produced predominantly breaks, gaps, fragments and exchanges.

Treatments Chromosomal Aberrations
Concentration (mg/kgbw) No. of cells Rings Fragments Exchange Breaks Dicentrics Gaps Total Aberrations %age of Aberrations
Distilled water 1004 2 6 - 15 - - 23 2.29
EMS 117.5 mg/kg bw 1020 8 35 28 123 - 62 256 25.09
Ab-EAE Alone 100 mg/kg bw 1000 3 4 - 14 - - 21 2.1
Ab-EAE Alone 400 mg/kg bw 1000 2 6 - 12 - - 20 2
Ab-EAE 100 mg/kg bw + EMS 1005 8 32 24 102 3 38 207 20.59
Ab-EAE 200 mg/kg bw + EMS 1000 6 28 20 86 - 26 166 16.5
Ab-EAE 300 mg/kg bw+ EMS 1005 4 24 18 62 1 18 127 12.63
Ab-EAE 400 mg/kg bw + EMS 1015 2 18 14 38 - 12 84 8.27

Table 5:Frequency of Chromosomal aberrations observed after post-treatment with Ethyl Acetate extract of Ajuga bracteosa in EMS treated mouse bone marrow cells. Ab-EAE=Ethyl Acetate extract of Ajuga bracteosa

clinical-toxicology-Ethyl-acetate

Figure 4: Bar diagram showing the %age reduction in chromosomal aberrations (CA) induced by EMS following post-treatment with Ethyl acetate extract of Ajuga bracteosa (Ab-EAE).

Discussion

From ancient times, medicinal plants are being used as remedies for various diseases in humans. In today’s industrialized society, the use of medicinal plants has been traced to the extraction and development of several drugs as they were used traditionally in folk medicine [24]. Medicinal plants have potent phytoconstituents which are important source of antibiotic compounds and are responsible for the therapeutic properties [25-32]. These phytoconstituents bestow them with medicinal properties [33,34]. The antioxidant properties, in many plants, are attributed to the presence of phenolic compounds. These phenolic compounds are known to possess various biological properties such as anti-apoptosis, anti-aging, anti-carcinogen, antiinflammation, anti-atherosclerosis, cardiovascular protection and improvement of endothelial function, as well as inhibition of angiogenesis and cell proliferation activities [35]. Flavonoids are hydroxylated phenolic substances known to be synthesized by plants in response to microbial infection and they have been found to be antimicrobial substances against wide array of microorganisms in vitro . Their activity is probably due to their ability to complex with extracellular and soluble proteins and to complex with bacterial cell wall [36]. They are also effective antioxidants and show strong anticancer activities [37]. Tannins bind to proline rich protein and interfere with protein synthesis. Besides, most of the phytochemicals are known to have therapeutic properties such as insecticidals [38], antibacterial, antifungal [39] and anticonstipative [40] activities etc.

The phytochemical screening of Ajuga bracteosa showed that their aerial parts were rich in saponins, alkaloids, phenol, tannins and Steroids. The presence of these phytochemicals in the tested plant indicates that this plant may be a good source for production of new drugs for various ailments. Saponins are known to produce inhibitory effect on inflammation [41]. They also have the property of precipitating and coagulating red blood cells. Some of the characteristics of saponins include formation of foams in aqueous solutions, hemolytic activity and cholesterol binding properties [42]. Steroids have been reported to possess antibacterial properties [43] and they are very important compounds especially due to their relationship with compounds such as sex hormones [44,45]. It has been reported that alkaloids possess analgesic [46], antispasmodic and antibacterial [47,48] properties. According to many reports, glycosides are known to show blood pressure lowering property [49]. Thus from the present study, it could be suggested that the identified phytoconstituents from Ajuga bracteosa make the plant valuable for bioactive compounds of sustainable medicine.

Important sources of new bioactive agents are the natural products. These natural products are obtained from medicinal herbs which are not only being used world-wide for the treatment of various diseases but also have a great potential for providing novel drug leads with novel mechanism of action [50]. The majority of higher plants contain a number of agents or phytoconstituents that are capable of causing mitigating effects to a number of mutagens [51]. The phytoconstituents from Terminalia arjuna suppressed the mutagenic effect of the aromatic amine, i.e., 2-aminofluorene (2-AF). The observed activity caused the inhibition of the metabolic activation of pro-mutagens [52]. It was also found that the extracts of Acanthopanax divaricatus were able to rapidly eliminate the mutagenic compounds from the cells before they induce the DNA damage [53]. In a similar study, it was observed that the methanol extracts of the lichens have antimutagenic effects against sodium azide [54]. The antimutagenic properties of plant extracts was also demonstrated against cyclophosphamide induced mutagenicity in mice [55]. The different extracts of Dioscorea pentaphylla were found to significantly inhibit the effects of methyl methanesulphonate (MMS) induced mutagenicity [56]. An edible wild plant, Tragopogon longirostis was also evaluated for antioxidant, mutagenic and antimutagenic properties and it was found that the ethanolic extract of its leaves exhibited antimutagenic properties at 2.5, 0.25, and 0.025 mg/plate concentrations [57]. The ethanolic extract of Origanum vulgare also reduced the frequency of MN PCR from 10.52 ± 1.07 for CP to 2.17 ± 0.6 for the synergic test of CP and the ethanolic extract [58].

Conclusion

The medicinal plants are the source of the secondary metabolites i.e., alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids, phlobatannins and reducing sugars. Medicinal plants play a vital role in preventing various diseases. The presence of secondary metabolites in Ajuga bracteosa bestow it with different biological properties like antidiuretic, antiinflammatory, antianalgesic, anticancer, anti-viral, antimalarial, antibacterial and anti-fungal. Thus, Ajuga bracteosa can be used for discovering and screening of the phytochemical constituents which are very helpful for the manufacturing of new drugs. Thus we hope that the important phytochemical properties identified in this study in the local plant of Kashmir Himalaya will be helpful in copping different diseases of this particular region.

Acknowledgements

The authors are highly thankful to the Director, Centre of Research for Development, University of Kashmir for providing the necessary facilities for the smooth research and also to Curator, Centre of Biodiversity and Plant Taxonomy, Department of Botany, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, J & K in proper identification of the plant. The authors are also thankful to Dr Ajai Kumar, Incharge GC-MS Facility, Advanced Instrumentation Research Facility (AIRF), Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi for GC-MS analysis.

References

  1. Bharat G, Parabia MH (2010) Pharmacognostic Evaluation of Bark and Seeds of Mimusopselengi. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2:110-113.
  2. Nostro A, Germano MP, Dangelo V, Marino A, Cannatelli MA (2000) Extraction methods and bioautography for evaluation of medicinal plant antimicrobial activity. LettApplMicrobiol 30: 379-384.
  3. Rao ML, Savithramma N (2012) Quantification of primary and secondary metabolites of Svensoniahyderobadensis-A rare medicinal plant. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 4: 519-521.
  4. Choudhary S, Singh B, Vijayvergia TR, Singh T (2013) Preliminary phytochemical screening and primary metabolites of Melothriamaderaspatana (Linn.) cong. International Journal of Biological and Pharmaceutical Research 4: 168-171.
  5. Krishnaiah D, Sarbatly R, Bono A (2007) Phytochemical antioxidants for health and medicine: A move towards nature. Biotechnology and Molecular Biology Reviews 1: 97-104.
  6. Mahato SB, Sen S (1997) Advances in triterpenoid research, 1990-1994. Phytochemistry 44: 1185-1236.
  7. Hérouart D, Sangwan RS, Fliniaux MA, Sangwan-Norreel BS (1988) Variations in the Leaf Alkaloid Content of Androgenic Diploid Plants of Daturainnoxia. Planta Med 54: 14-17.
  8. Kumbhar RR, Godghate AG (2015) Physicochemical and quantitative phytochemical analysis of some medicinal plants in and around Gadhinglaj. International Journal of Science Environment and Technology 4: 172-177.
  9. Pereira RP, Fachineto R, Prestes AS, Puntel RL, Boschetti TK, et al. (2009) Antioxidant effects of different extracts from Melissa officinalis, Matricariarecutita and Cymbopogoncitratus. Neurochem Res 34: 973-983.
  10. Kwak Y, Ju J (2015) Inhibitory activities of Perillafrutescensbritton leaf extract against the growth, migration, and adhesion of human cancer cells. Nutr Res Pract 9: 11-16.
  11. Liu HX, He MT, Tan HB, Gu W, Yang SX, et al. (2015) Xanthine oxidase inhibitors isolated from Piper nudibaccatum.Phytochemistry Letters 12: 133-137.
  12. Dutt HC, Bhagat N, Pandita S (2015) Oral traditional knowledge on medicinal plants in jeopardy among Gaddi shepherds in hills of northwestern Himalaya, J&K, India. J Ethnopharmacol 168: 337-348.
  13. Berhow MA, Wagner ED, Vaughn SF, Plewa MJ (2000) Characterization and antimutagenic activity of soybean saponins. Mutat Res 448: 11-22.
  14. Hernandez-Ceruelos A, Madrigal-Bujaidadar E, De La Cruz C (2002) Inhibitory affect of chamomile essential oil on the sister chromatid exchanges by daunorubicin and methyl methanesulfonate in mouse bone marrow. ToxicolLett 135: 103-110.
  15. de Sousa AC, Alviano DS, Blank AF, Alves PB, Alviano CS, et al. (2004) Melissa officinalis L. essential oil: antitumoral and antioxidant activities. J Pharm Pharmacol 56: 677-681.
  16. Chauhan NS (1999) Medicinal and aromatic plants of Himachal Pradesh Indus publishing company New Delhi 500.
  17. Upadhyay SU, Patel VB, Patel AA, Upadhyay UL, Patel NM (2011) Ajugabracteosa- A promising herb. Pharma science monitor - An international Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2080-2088.
  18. Khare CP (2007) Indian Medicinal Plants - An Illustrated Dictionary. 1st Indian Reprint Springer (India) Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi28.
  19. Chandel S, Bagai U (2010) Antiplasmodial activity of Ajugabracteosa against Plasmodium berghei infected BALB/c mice. Indian J Med Res 131: 440-444.
  20. Sofowora AE (1993) Medicinal Plants and Traditional Medicines in Africa. 2nd edition. Spectrum Books, Ibadan, Nigeria. p. 289.
  21. Trease GE, Evans WC (1989) Trease and Evans’ Pharmacognosy. 13th Edn., BailliereTindall, London, UK., ISBN-13: 9780702013577, Pages: 832.
  22. Harborne JB (1973) Phytochemical Methods. Chapman and Hall Ltd., London, UK. pp: 49-188.
  23. Okwu DE (2004) Phytochemicals and vitamin content of indigenous species of southeastern Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and the Environment 6: 30-37.
  24. Shrikumar S, Ravi TK (2007) Approaches towards development and promotion of herbal drugs. Pharmacognosy 1: 180-184.
  25. Jeeva S, Johnson M, Aparna JS, Irudayaraj V (2011) Preliminary phytochemical and antibacterial studies on flowers of selected medicinal plants. IntJ MedArom Plants 1: 107-114.
  26. Jeeva S, Johnson M (2012) Antibacterial and phytochemical studies on Begonia flacciferaBedd. flower. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine 1: 151-154.
  27. Florence AR, Joselin J, Jeeva (2012) Intraspecific variation of bioactive principles in select members of the genus Clerodendrum L. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research 11: 4908- 4914.
  28. Florence AR, Joselin J, Brintha TSS, Sukumaran S, Jeeva S (2014) Preliminary phytochemical studies of select members of the family Annonaceae for bioactive constituents. Bioscience discovery 5: 85-96.
  29. Joselin J, Brintha TSS, Florence AR, Jeeva S (2012) Screening of select ornamental flowers of the family Apocyanaceae for phytochemical constituents. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Disease 2: 260-264.
  30. Joselin J, Brintha TSS, Florence AR, Jeeva S (2013) Phytochemical evaluation of Bignonaceae flowers. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research 5: 106-111.
  31. Sainkhediya J, Ray S (2012) Preliminary study of flowering plant diversity of Nimar region. Bioscience Discovery 3: 70-72.
  32. Sumathi BM, Uthayakumari F (2014) GC MS analysis of Leaves of JatrophamaheswariiSubram&Nayar. Science Research Reporter 4: 24-30.
  33. Brown JE, Rice-Evans CA (1998) Luteolin-rich artichoke extract protects low density lipoprotein from oxidation in vitro. Free Radic Res 29: 247-255.
  34. Krings U, Berger RG (2001) Antioxidant activity of roasted foods. Food Chemistry 72: 223-229.
  35. Han X, Shen T, Lou H (2007) Dietry polyphenols and their biological significance. Int JMolSci8: 950-988.
  36. Marjorie C (1999) Plant products as antimicrobial agents. ClinMicrobiol Rev 12: 564-582.
  37. Del-Rio A, Obdululio BG, Casfillo J, Main FG, Ortuno A (1997) Uses and properties of citrus flavonoids. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 45: 4505-4515.
  38. Kambu K, Di Phenzu N, Coune C, Wauter JN, Angenot L (1982) Plants Medicine ET. Phytotherapie 34.
  39. Lemos TLG, Matos FJA, Alencar JW, Crareiro AA, Clark AM, et al. (1990) Antimicrobial activity of essential oils of Brazilian plants. Phytotherapy Research 4: 82-84.
  40. Ferdous AJ, Islam SM, Ahsan M, Hassan CM, Ahmad ZV (1992) In vitro antibacterial activity of the volatile oil of Nigella sativa seeds against multiple drugresistant isolates of Shigella spp. and isolates of Vibrio cholerae and Escherichia coli. Phytotherapy Research 6: 137-140.
  41. Just MJ, Recio MC, Giner RM, Cuéllar MJ, Máñez S, et al. (1998) Anti-inflammatory activity of unusual lupanesaponins from Bupleurumfruticescens. Planta Med 64: 404-407.
  42. Sodipo OA, Akiniyi JA, Ogunbamosu JU (2000) Studies on certain on certain characteristics of extracts of bark of Pansinystaliamacruceras (K schemp) picrreExbeille. Global Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences 6: 83-87.
  43. Epand RF, Savage PB, Epand RM (2007) Bacterial lipid composition and the antimicrobial efficacy of cationic steroid compounds (Ceragenins). BiochimBiophys Acta 1768: 2500-2509.
  44. Okwu DE (2001) Evaluation of chemical composition of medicinal plants belonging to Euphorbiaceae. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 14: 160-162.
  45. Nobori T, Miura K, Wu DJ, Lois A, Takabayashi K, et al. (1994) Deletions of the cyclin-dependent kinase-4 inhibitor gene in multiple human cancers. Nature 368: 753-756.
  46. Antherden LM (1969) Textbook Of Pharmaceutical Chemistry. 8th edn., Oxford University Press, London, pp. 813-814.
  47. Stray F (1998) The Natural Guide to Medicinal herbs And Plants. Tiger Books International, London, pp. 12-16.
  48. Okwu DE, Okwu ME (2004) Chemical composition of Spondiasmombinlinn. plant parts. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and the Environment 6: 140-147.
  49. Nyarko AA, Addy ME (1990) Effects of aqueous extract of Adeniacissampeloides on blood pressure and serum analyte of hypertensive patients. Phytotherapy Research 4: 25-28.
  50. Dar SA, Ganai FA, Yousuf AR, Balkhi MU, Bhat TM, et al. (2013) Pharmacological and toxicological evaluation of Urticadioica. Pharm Biol 51: 170-180.
  51. Mitscher LA, Telikepalli H, McGhee E, Shankel DM (1996) Natural antimutagenic agents. Mutat Res 350: 143-152.
  52. Kaur S, Kumar S, Kaur P, Chandel M (2010) Study of antimutagenic potential of phytoconstituents isolated from Terminaliaarjuna in the Salmonella/microsome assay. Am J BiomedSci 2: 164-177.
  53. Hong CE, Cho MC, Jang HA, Lyu SY (2011) Mutagenicity and anti-mutagenicity of Acanthopanaxdivaricatus var. albeofructus. J ToxicolSci 36: 661-668.
  54. Nardemir G, Yanmis D, Alpsoy L, Gulluce M, Agar G, et al. (2013) Genotoxic, antigenotoxic and antioxidant properties of methanol extracts obtained from Peltigerahorizontalis and Peltigerapraetextata. ToxicolInd Health 31: 602-613.
  55. Durnova NA, Kurchatova MN (2015) [THE EFFECT OF PLANT EXTRACTS ON THE CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE INDUCTION OF MICRONUCLEUS IN RED BLOOD CELLS OF OUTBRED WHITE MICE]. Tsitologiia 57: 452-458.
  56. Prakash G, Hosetti BB, Dhananjaya BL (2014) Antimutagenic effect of dioscoreapentaphylla on genotoxic effect induced by methyl methanesulfonate in the Drosophila wing spot test. ToxicolInt 21: 258-263.
  57. Sarac N (2015) Antioxidant, mutagenic, and antimutagenic activities of Tragopogonlongirostis var. longirostis, an edible wild plant in Turkey. Indian J Pharmacol 47: 414-418.
  58. Habibi E, Shokrzadeh M, Ahmadi A, Chabra A, Naghshvar F, et al. (2015) Genoprotective effects of Origanumvulgareethanolic extract against cyclophosphamide-induced genotoxicity in mouse bone marrow cells. Pharmbiol53: 92-97.
Citation: Ganaie HA, Ali MN, Ganai BA, Kaur J, Ahmad M (2016) GC-MS Analysis and Evaluation of Mutagenic and Antimutagenic Activity of Ethyl Acetate Extract of Ajuga bracteosa Wall ex. Benth: An Endemic Medicinal Plant of Kashmir Himalaya, India. J Clin Toxicol 6:288.

Copyright: © 2016 Ganaie HA, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top