Mycobacterial Diseases

Mycobacterial Diseases
Open Access

ISSN: 2161-1068

+44 1478 350008

Review Article - (2014) Volume 4, Issue 6

Glycogenomics of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Anil Kumar Gupta, Amit Singh and Sarman Singh*
Division of Clinical Microbiology and Molecular Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
*Corresponding Author: Sarman Singh, Division of Clinical Microbiology and Molecular Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi-110 029, India, Tel: +91-11-26588484, Fax: +91-11-26588641 Email:

Abstract

Glycogen is an important energy store of almost all living organisms. It is an alpha linked polymer comprised of thousands of glucose units. In bacteria it is usually synthesized when carbon ions are in excess in the growth medium and its synthesis helps for the survival of the bacteria under such nutritional conditions. Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis), accumulates glycogen during the adverse condition such as reactive oxygen and nitrogen intermediates, low pH, nutrients and other vital element starvation for their survival in the host. Glycogen also plays a very important role in the pathogenesis of M. tuberculosis. The biosynthesis of glycogens is mediated by glycosyltransferases enzyme which can be divided into two families; glycogen transferase (GT) 3 and glycosyltransferases GT 5. Regulation of glycogen metabolism in bacteria involves a complex mechanism, involving several synthase enzymes such as glycogen synthase A (glgA), glycogen branching enzyme (glgB), and catalytic enzyme (glgC). Another enzyme known as glycogen phosphorylase (glgP), removes extra units of glucose from the non- reducing ends of the glycogen molecule. Several workers have recognized role of glycogen in Mycobacterial pathogenesis, in the recent years. Trehalose-dimycolate (TDM) and trehalose-monomycolate (TMM) present in the cell wall are indeed a precursor of mycolic acid of Mycobacteria, which plays an important role in its invasion and pathogenesis. This review focuses on various cycles and mechanisms involved in the glycogen synthesis in M. tuberculosis and its role in pathogenesis.

Keywords: Glycogen, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, MTB, Glycogen transferases

Introduction

All living organisms present on the earth accumulates glucose as energy storage molecules in the form of glycogen or starch [1,2]. Glycogen is a polysaccharide localized in the cytoplasm, which is mainly utilized by bacteria, fungus or animals [3-5]. Starch is synthesized in the plant and stored in plastids. It is composed of two glucose polymers: amyl pectin, which is the main component and is sufficient to form starch granules, and amylase [6]. Glycogen and amylopectin are the complex molecules containing α-4-linked glucose units with α-6-branching points. The length and number of branches vary depending on the organism [5,7,8]. Glycogen is linked with α glucose polymer with the ~90 % α-4-links in its backbone and ~10 % α-6-linked branches [9]. It is comprised thousands of glucose units and is generally synthesized in bacteria, when excess carbon is present over other nutrient that limits growth [3,10]. Glycogen covered 60% of dry cell weight and enhances the cell survival (e.g. M.tuberculosis). It rapidly accumulates prior to beginning of sporulation in Bacillus cereus and production of exo-polysaccharides in M. tuberculosis [11].

Glycogen and starch both are extra-large sized glucose polymers and are the major reservoir of freely available carbon and energy source of all living organisms such as archaea, eubacteria, yeasts and higher eukaryotes including animals and plants. The parasitic lifestyle appears to be related to the reduction and eventual complete abolishment of glycogen metabolism [12]. In mammals, uptake and utilization of glucose are under stretched control. Any defect in the normal glucose level, lead to induce a variety of glycogen storage diseases, like diabetes in the human [13].

M. tuberculosis, aerobic, acid fast bacilli that cause tuberculosis in human, accumulates glycogen during the adverse condition i.e. reactive oxygen and nitrogen intermediates, low pH, nutrients and other vital element starvation for their survival in the host [14]. Although, glycogen accumulation does not occur during exponential growth under laboratory culture conditions, but existence of glycogen may increase the viability of M. tuberculosis under adverse conditions. Glycogen also plays a very important role in the pathogenesis of M. tuberculosis [15]. It has been validated in the M. tuberculosis, if the organisms are physiologically inactive for long time period; its storage of sugars becomes very important for survival. Various groups of scientific community has been reported that, glycan’s may regulate biochemical pathways by binding of these molecules to proteins and lipids during the post-translational modifications via covalent and non-covalent interactions. It also acts as a boundary between cells, tissues and organs to organize biological processes [16]. Therefore, from a biological viewpoint, complex glycan’s represent a promising, but relatively untapped, source for the development of new pharmaceutical agents. In this context, many uncharacterized glycosyltransferase (GTs) of M. tuberculosis are of particular interest of researchers. This review summarizes present knowledge and facts on characterizing and putative GTs in Mycobacterium spp.

Glycosyltransferases (GTs)- A key enzymes of glycogen synthesis

The biosynthesis of glycogen is mediated by glycosyltransferase enzyme [17]. GTs constitutes a large family of enzymes that are involved in the biosynthesis of oligosaccharides, polysaccharides and glycoconjugates [18,19]. Due to enormous diversity of these enzymes, it’s mediating a wide range of functions both structural and storage for molecular signaling. It is present in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes and generally display vast specificity for both the glycosyl donor and acceptor. In eukaryotes, glycosylation reactions occur in the specialized compartment such as golgi apparatus and generate a wide range of structural oligosaccharide diversity of eukaryotic cells [20].

But in prokaryotes, they produce a variety of glycoconjugates and polysaccharides of vast structural diversity and complexity. In E. coli, glgC, glgA and glgB gens encode glycogen synthesis enzymes and glgP and glgX genes encode enzymes for glycogen degradation. The role of glgC and glgA is a generation of the activated glucose nucleotide diphosphate and linear glucan chain respectively. GlgB, or glycogen branching enzyme, catalyzes the transfer of a fragment of 6–7 glucose units from a non-reducing end of hydroxyl group of C6 of a glucose unit, either on the same glucose chain or adjacent chains. GlgB is very essential enzyme present in bacteria [21], and fungus, responsible for glycogen accumulation. Functional glgB (encoded by the ORF Rv1326c) is essential for normal growth of M. tuberculosis [22]. In bacteria, glycans includes many unusual sugars which are generally not found in vertebrates, i.e. Kdo (3-deoxy-D-manno-octulosonic acid), heptoses, and also various modified hexoses. The modified hexoses molecules play a very important role in the pathogenicity of bacterial cells. In some instances, the donor substrates are lipids (dolichol-phosphate), linked to glucose or mannose or a dolichol-oligosaccharide precursor and play major role in the assembly of peptidoglycan, lipopolysaccharide, and capsules [17].

Classification of glycosyltransferase (Glycogen Synthase)

Based on sequence and structural analysis, glycogen synthase (GS) have grouped within the GTB-fold of glycosyl transferases. These structures are characterized by the presence of two Rossmann fold domains with a deep inter domain cleft in between that harbors the substrate-binding and catalytic sites. GTB-fold enzymes are further subdivided into two families, GT3 and GT5 (Figure 1). The bacterial and archaeal GS enzymes are grouped in the GT5 family and eukaryotic enzymes are grouped into the GT3 family and are regulated through the allosteric activator glucose-6- phosphate (G-6-P) and inhibitory phosphorylation.

mycobacterial-diseases-Schematic-representation

Figure 1: Schematic representation of the Glycotransferases (GTs) enzymes classification.

An additional point of distinction is that the bacterial enzyme uses adenosine diphosphate (ADP) -glucose as their sugar donor, whereas eukaryotic enzymes almost exclusively utilize uridine diphosphate (UDP) glucose as their donor molecule. Archaeal enzymes are capable of using both ADP and UDP-glucose as sugar donors. To date, three dimensional structures have been determined for three members of the GT5 family - a monomeric E. coli enzyme, dimeric Agrobacterium tumefacians and trimeric Pyrococcus abyssi. However, these structures have shed little light on the regulatory mechanisms controlling eukaryotic enzymes.

Mechanisms of action

The action mechanisms of GTs are based on the use of an activated donor, such as nucleotide di-phosphosugar, nucleoside mono-phosphosugar or lipid phosphosugar and acceptor molecules like a hydroxyl group of amino acid. GTs catalyzes the transfer of monosaccharide moieties from activated nucleotide sugar (glycosyl donor) to glycosyl acceptor molecules, forming glycosidic bonds. The mechanism of inverting GTs is believed to be similar to the one of inverting glycosyl-hydrolases with the requirement of one acidic amino acid, which activates the acceptor hydroxyl group by deprotonation [20].

c glycogen- role and regulation

In higher eukaryotes such as mammals, glycogen is synthesized at the time of nutritional abundance. The two major tissues or organ systems that serve as a glycogen stores in higher eukaryotes, are skeletal muscles and liver. Other organs like brain, adipose, kidney and pancreas are also capable of synthesizing minute quantity of glycogen. In the skeletal muscles, glycogen provides energy for muscular contraction during generation of glucose-6-phosphate (G-6-P) from glycogen for entry into glycolysis as a means for ATP production and liver glycogen play vital role in glucose homeostasis or maintaining the blood glucose level during fasting. Any defect or mutation in the enzymes involved in glycogen metabolism leads to development of glycogen storage disease (GSD), which affects the liver, muscle or both and other organs.

In the budding yeast (Sacccharomyces cerevisiae), glycogen is one of the major reservoir of carbohydrate and accounts 20% of the dry weight of yeast cells. The amount of glycogen accumulated in the cell increases, when the cell enters into the stationary phase or in depletion of essential nutrients like nitrogen and phosphorous in the growth media. Also, Glycogen accumulation was observed when exponentially growing S. cerevisiae exposed cells to high temperature, salt, oxidizing agents or ethanol. The accumulated glycogen has been utilized for their survival by yeast during nutrient deprivation [23,24]. Additionally, yeast has a growth advantage over other non-glycogen accumulative cells, as it makes a contribution to the overall fitness of the cell [25].

The glycogen regulation in eukaryotes is controlled by the activity of various enzymes such as glycogenin, glycogen synthase, branching and de-branching enzyme followed by multiple mechanisms including covalent modification, allosteric activators and translocation within the cells [23,25-29]. The common regulatory themes of GTs are phosphorylation and allosteric activation by G-6-P, but the physiological responses that interrupt these regulatory controls often differ between different organisms and even between different tissues of the same organism [29]. Yeast has two different isoforms of glycogen synthase (GS), of which the nutritionally regulated isoform-2 (GSY2) has shown to be the most essential enzyme for the accumulation of glycogen in the cells. Unlike the other higher eukaryote, where the regulation of glycogen metabolism is primarily control by the action of enzyme activities, in yeast it involves both transcriptional and enzymatic responses. The transcriptional response is dependent on the presence of the cis-element stress response element (STRE) in the promoter of the genes involved in glycogen pathways. The enzymatic control of glycogen deposition is controlled by the activation of GS through G-6-P and inactivation of Glycoside-Pentoside-Hexuroni (GPH) through phosphorylation. Exposure of the starved cells to nutrients activates GPH, inhibits GS resulting in the mobilization of glycogen and vice versa.

Prokaryotes glycogen- synthesis, degradation and regulation

The enzymology of glycogen biosynthetic and degradative processes is highly conserved in prokaryotes [3,30]. Extracellular glucose is taken up and converted into G-6-P by the carbohydrate phosphotransferase system (PTS). G-6-P is further converted into glucose-1-phosphate (G-1-P) by the action of phosphoglucomutase (PGM) and finally converted into ADP glucose (ADPG) in the presence of Mg2+ and ATP [30]. ADPG act as sugar donor nucleotide for the production of bacterial glycogen by the action of glycogen synthase (glgA). After chain elongation by glgA, glycogen branching enzyme (glgB) catalyzes the formation of branched oligosaccharide chains having α-6-glucosidic linkages [3]. Genetic evidence of glycogen synthesis suggested that glgC is the sole enzyme catalyzing the production of ADPG [30,31].

Regulation of glycogen metabolism in bacteria, involves a complex group of factors that adjusted to the physiological and energetic status of the cell [32,33], expression of corresponding genes and cell-to-cell communication [34]. At genomic level, several factors have been described to control the bacterial glycogen accumulation. In M. tuberculosis, it is subjected to allosteric regulation of enzymes [3,35]. The product of glgC gene is representing the signals of high carbon and energy contents within the cell, whereas the presence of inhibitors provides the signal at the low metabolic energy levels (Figure 2) [30]. Allosteric regulation of glgC has been extensively reviewed in recent years including structural and functional relationships of glgC, glgA and glgB [3,30].

mycobacterial-diseases-Systemic-representation

Figure 2: Systemic representation of genes mediated regulatory pathway of Glycogen synthesis in M. tuberculosis.

Glycogen phosphorylase (glgP), which removes glucose units from the non-reducing ends of the glycogen molecule, shows strong and highly specific interaction between glgP and HPr (a PTS component) by surface plasmon resonance ligand fishing [32,35]. The binding of glgP to HPr is maximal, when HPr is totally phosphorylated and reduce activity of glgP during log phase of M. tuberculosis and vice-versa. It’s assumed that activity of glgP is regulated by the phosphorylation status of Hpr and therefore allowing the accumulation of glycogen at the beginning of the stationary phase under glucose excess conditions (Table 1) [35,36].

Organisms Organism Name Enzyme Name Name of Glycotransferese GT Family References
Virus T4- Phage BGT β-Glycosyltransferase GT63 [69]
Prokaryotes A. tumefaciens AtGS Glycogen Synthase GT5 [15]
Amycolatopsisorientalis GtfA β-Epi-vancosaminyltransferase GT-1 [70]
GtfB β-Glycosyltransferase GT-1 [70]
GtfD β -vancosaminyltransferase GT-1 [70]
B. subtilis SpsA Putative glycosyltransferase GT-2 [71]
Campylobactorjejuni CstII α-2-3-8-Sialyltransferase Gt-42 [72]
E. coli. MurG β -1-4- Galactosyltranserase GT-28 [73]
OtsA Trehalose-6-phosphate synthase GT-20 [74]
RfaF Heptosyltransferase GT-9 [74]
Neisseria meningitidis LgtC α -1-4-Galactosyltransferase GT-8 [75]
Rhodothermusmarinus MGS Mannosylglycerate GT-78 [76]
Mouse Ext12 α-1-4-N- Acetylhexosaminlytransferase GT-64 [18]
ppGalNAc-T1 Polypeptide- α-GalNActransferase GT-27 [18]
Rabbit Glycogenin α-Glucosyltransferase GT-8 [74]
GnT1 β-1-2-GlcNAc transferase GT-13 [77]
Bovine α3GalT α-3-Galactosyltransferase GT-6 [78]
β4GalT1 β-1-4- Galactosyltransferase I GT-7 [78]
Human GlcAT-I β-1-3-Glucuronytransferase GT-43 [19]
GlcAT-P β-1-3-Glucuronytransferase GT-43 [79]
GTA α-3-GalNAc transferase A GT-6 [80]
GTB α-3-GalNAc transferase B GT-6 [80,81]

Table 1: Glycotransferases enzymes with available crystal structures.

Pathways of glycogen synthesis, degradation and its regulation in M. tuberculosis

Glycogen synthesis, an endergonic process and is synthesized from monomers of UDP-glucose. The genetic basis of glycogen synthesis and degradation has been extensively characterized in E. coli. In E. coli, glgC, glgA and glgB genes encode glycogen synthesis enzymes and glgP and glgX encode enzymes for glycogen degradation [37,38]. It is expected that bacteria have been synthesize glycogen using classical glgC-glgA pathway (Figure 3).

mycobacterial-diseases-Bacterial-glucan

Figure 3: Bacterial glucan pathways. GlgC and GlgA are central to the classical glycogen pathway. The Rv3032 pathway is associated with methylglucose lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis. The newly identified GlgE pathway (red) (Kalscheue et al.) may contribute to cytosolic glycogen, capsular glucan and/or methylglucose lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis.

The activated glucose nucleotide diphosphate generated from G-1-P by the action of nucleotide di-phosphoglucose pyrophosphorylase (glgC) and subsequently polymerization by glycogen synthase (glgA), for generation of linear glucan [6,10]. Conversion of linear glucan’s into glycogen is mediated by glgB enzyme through the transfer of oligo glucans (non-reducing-end) to the 6-position of residual chain for the generation of side branches [10,39].

Expressions of glgC and glgA genes are regulated by intracellular bacterial signals, which denote the energy status of the cell [40]. Deletion or mutations in glgC gene prevent glycogen synthesis in E. coli. [9]. The outcome of recent studies suggested that a tiny amount of glycogen can be synthesized in naturally glgC deleted mutant during growth under specific conditions [3,41]. Also, glgS is linked to the glycogen synthesis process, but role is still unclear. Recent study shows that it could be plays important role during glycogen accumulation in E. coli [4,38,42]. In prokaryotes, glycogen has been degraded by the combined action of two enzyme glgP (highly conserved enzyme together) and glgX, to yield G-1-P, which is directly utilized in the primary metabolism of bacteria [10]. Glycogen phosphorylase enzyme degrades glycogen by sequentially removes glucose units from the non-reducing ends of glycogen and glgX removes α- 6 linkages of glycogen via hydrolyzing manner [39]. glgP and glgX regulates glycogen degradation according to the energy requirement of bacteria. A recent study suggests the deletion of either glgP or glgX or both prevents degradation of internal stores of glycogen [39]. Trehalose, a well-known disaccharide present in bacteria as storage carbohydrate and is used as both an energy store and a stress-protectant. Trehalose helps bacteria to survive under desiccation, cold and osmotic stress [43,44]. Trehalose is consist of α-1-1 linkage of di-glucose and synthesized in bacteria from glucose phosphate intermediates via trehalose-6-phosphate, using the GalU-OtsA-OtsB system [45]. Trehalose can constitute more than 10% of cellular dry weight, and might be the major storage carbohydrate during specialized developmental states i.e. spores and bacteroids.

In mycobacteria, trehalose shows extraordinary interest for researchers due of its incorporation into mycolic acids. Mycolic acid is a cell wall component of mycobacteria and is involved in the pathogenesis of M. tuberculosis [46,47]. Because of poor appearance of trehalose, conversion from trehalose to glucose has been studies relatively low as compared to other molecules [48,49]. The transcriptional regulation of glycogen operon is also mediated through the RNA polymerase (Es70) by the restricted action of RpoS subunit [40]. Makinoshima et al. demonstrated that the rpoS mutants of E. coli accumulate less glycogen as compared to the wild type strain of E. coli [50]. The biosynthesis of glycogen is depending on the substrate accessibility and allosteric activity of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase [9] and catabolism is adjusted to accommodate changes in the availability of easily utilizable energy sources [40].

Role of glycogen under stress condition in M.tuberculosis

Mycobacterium cell wall accounts approximately 2-3% of dry weight of bacteria and constituted mostly of polysaccharide and proteins (94-99%). Mycobacterial glycans is similar to E. coli glycogen and the exact role of glycogen under stress (hypoxia, nutrient deprivation, Nitrous oxide treatment and growth in acidic media) environment is not fully understood [22]. But it has been reported by various group of scientific community, mycobacteria accumulates glycogen under stress condition for their survival and endogenous reserves during post exponential growth. [Antoine and Tepper, 1968 was demonstrated that glycogen and lipid accumulation increased affectedly as the nitrogen/ sulfur content of the medium was dropped in M. phlei and M. tuberculosis under stress conditions. In the absence of exogenous carbon substrate, these reserve substrates were utilized as carbon and energy source and continued growth of organism. Glycogen inhibits phagocytosis of M. tuberculosis in macrophage and also takes part in host-pathogen interaction during pathogen entry in to the host [51].

Alternatively, glycogen or its intermediates also act as key role for production of two unusual cell wall constitutes i.e. 6-O-methylglucosyl-containinglipopolysaccharides (MGLP) and the 3-O-methylmannose polysaccharides, which plays regulatory role in fatty acid biosynthesis in M. tuberculosis [52].

Role of glycogen in pathogenomics of M.tuberculosis

Glycogen is one of the most important storage sugars in the living world. It is provides nutrition to the organism and plays a very important role during host pathogen interaction [15]. Under the nutrient limiting conditions, glycogen accumulation occurs in M. tuberculosis and their role in survival and pathogenesis is poorly understood.

The glycogen has been playing a minor role in virulence and colonization in the Salmonella typhi, but has a more significant role in their survival. It has been demonstrated that the capsule consists of carbohydrate (glycan up to 80%), proteins and tiny volume of lipids [15,40,53]. The glycan’s of mycobacterium envelope showed unique features than other bacteria. Its cell wall consists of mycolic acids (also known as arabinoglacton) and peptidoglycan, which constitutes “the core” of the cell wall and it is intercalated by a number of glycolipids such as lipoarabinomannan (LAM), the phosphatidylinositol containing mannosides (PIMs), phenolic glycolipids (PGLs), trehalose-dimycolate (TDM) and trehalose-monomycolate (TMM) present in the cell wall [27,54]. M. tuberculosis capsule is located outside of the mycolic acid layers, which contains generally polysaccharides such as arabinomannan and α-glucans and take part during the time of infection and invasion of macrophages [55]. The trehalose (formed by glycogen) is the precursor of formation of mycolyl acetyl trehalose (known as mycolic acid or cord factor). Also, mycobacteria synthesize unusual polysaccharides containing α-4-linked methylated hexoses (methyl glucose lipopolysaccharide (MGLP), methyl-mannose polysaccharide (MMP) that is slightly hydrophobic and helical conformation as amylose chain. These polysaccharides forms stable complex with fatty acids and modulate the activity of fatty acid synthase I (FAS I) In vitro. The MGLP has been found in both slow- and rapid-growing mycobacteria, while MMP has been detected only in rapid-growing mycobacteria. The synthesis and regulation of MGLP are shown in Figure 4. Based on presence of complex glucan and their derivatives in the M. tuberculosis cell wall suggested that glycogen might be responsible for pathogenesis.

mycobacterial-diseases-enzyme-activities

Figure 4: Pathway for the synthesis of the MGLP in M. tuberculosis. Confirmed activities are shaded in green. White boxes indicate putative/deduced enzyme activities. Genes linked to the MGLP pathway by mutagenesis studies are indicated in blue box. GpgS (Rv1208), glucosyl-3-phosphoglycerate synthase; GpgP (Rv2419), glucosyl-3-phosphoglycerate phosphatase; DggS, diglucosylglycerate synthase; GT, glucosyltransferases

Glyco-immunology in M. tuberculosis pathogenesis

Carbohydrate constitute M. tuberculosis capsules representing up to 80% of the extracellular polysaccharides (glycan), composed of α-4-α-DGlc-1 core branched at position six every five or six residues by 4-α-D-Glc-1 oligoglucosides [22,56,57]. The mycobacterial ligands that interact with macrophage receptors are less well characterized. Therefore, as the discovery of the role of capsular carbohydrates in bacterial pathogenesis, researchers have been given focus on the identification and characterization of the macrophage receptors involve in the binding and phagocytosis of M. tuberculosis. Carbohydrates are pathogenic mycobacterial species and have been determined much later than the discovery of the mycobacterial capsule [22,57,58].The reducing end of arabinogalacton (AG) consists of α-3-GlcNAc disaccharide, which is attached through phosphodiester linkage to the muramic acids of peptidoglycan [59]. The arabinan of AG contains 2 to 3 branched chain attached at 5-position to Galf residue of the galactan chain nearby to its reducing end. D-arabinan chain consists of 22 Araf residues [60]. The core structure of D-arabinan consists of backbone of α-5-linked Araf with several α-3-linked branch points and the non-reducing ends are always terminated by β-2-Araf. This assembly leads to the characteristic hexa-arabinoside (Ara6) motifs at the non-reducing ends of AG, of which the dimers [β-D-Araf-2-α-D-Araf] constitute mycolic acid attachment sites. PG and AG together forms an important covalently linked network located between the plasma membrane and the mycolic acid layer. These components of mycobacterial cell wall make the cell extremely robust and difficult to penetrate [55].

Unlike AG, LAM is a non-covalently linked to the cell envelope components and may be attached in the plasma membrane or mycolic acid layer or both through the phosphatidyl-myo-inositol (PI) unit. The reducing end of LAM shares structural similarities to the PI-mannosides (PIMs) and the inositol residues of the PI of both the PIMs and LAM are mannosylated at the 2 and the 6 positions (Figure 2) [55]. At present, there is limited information about the biological functions of these components. The mycobacterial cell wall moieties, i.e. lipoarabinomannan, binds to macrophage and glucans are able to inhibit the binding of mycobacteria to complement receptor 3 expressed in CHO cells [61]. The capsular polysaccharides, mediated the non-opsonic binding of M. tuberculosis H37Rv to CR3 [22,62]. The cell wall of Pseudallescheria boydii contains a vast amount of glycogen, which shows structural similarity to the M. tuberculosis and are involves in the infection or internalization of fungus by macrophages. It is also capable to induce the innate immune response by the involvement of toll-like receptor2, CD14 and MyD88 receptors [63]. In another study, the M. tuberculosis capsular components were revealed to contain compounds that displayed antiphagocytic properties with certain types of macrophages [61]. Also, induce monocytes to differentiate into altered dendritic cells that failed to present lipid antigens to CD1-restricted T cells [64].

Glycogen based therapeutics and drug targets

The emergence of multidrug-resistant strains of M. tuberculosis accentuate the need to identify novel drug targets or new drugs for treatment of tuberculosis, which could act against the tubercular bacilli that persists during prolonged therapy with currently available drugs [65,66]. Enzymes involved in glycogen metabolisms (take part in synthesis of essential components of the cell envelope in bacteria), display auspicious drug targets for designing new drugs against mycobacteria; glgB shows unique drug targets for M. tuberculosis. It has been demonstrated that toxic polymers accumulated insight the glgB autotrophs and finally induce cell death. The absence of glucan’s did not affect the outcome of macrophage infections with mycobacteria mutants, but its presence advise their protective role in persisting stage of mycobacteria during chronic infections [67]. Additionally, an alternative pathway (glgE depended) of glucan’s biosynthesis was identified in mycobacteria. The glgE gene transfers an activated glucose residue to maltose1-phosphate via alpha 1-4 linkage. The gene pep2 (Rv0127) would phosphorylate and activate maltose reducing glucose and ultimately polymerization of glycogen initiated. As similar to glgB mutant role, mutation in glgE gene displays auspicious drug targets for mycobacteria, as it is part of earlier unrecognized α-glucan pathway that has never been targeted to induce death in mycobacteria. GlgE displays killing of bacteria by two mechanisms, The first death mechanism (glgE dependent) is self-poisoning by accumulation of the phosphosugar Maltose1phosphate followed by feedback inhibition of glgE. The second death mechanism (glgE independent) is based on essentiality of glgE pathway products. Both the genes (glgB and glgE) seem to be in an operon and it was assumed that the reason for their essentiality in mycobacteria was the accumulation of toxic product. Thus, inhibiting GlgE has become an exciting drug target [67].

Alternatively, Trehalose synthesis pathway from glycogen is widely studies in mycobacteria and the enzyme involved in trehalose metabolism shows promising drug targets for M. tuberculosis due to its importance in bacterial cytoplasm and presence in toxic glycolipids [66]. Several antibiotics, which inhibit the growth of M. smegmatis had an effect on the trehalose biosynthetic enzymes. Disruption of trehalose mycolyltransferase enzyme by 6-azido-6-deoxy-a,a-trehalose shows inhibition of mycobacterial growth in vitro [68].

In summary, glycotransferase enzymes, which are involved in the synthesis of essential components of the cell envelope in bacteria, could be explored as novel drug targets for the development of new drugs against bacterial pathogens.

References

  1. Alonso CN, Dauvillée D, Viale AM, Muñoz FJ, Baroja FE, et al.(2006) Glycogen phosphorylase, the product of the glgP Gene, catalyzes glycogen breakdown by removing glucose units from the non-reducing ends in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol 188: 5266-5272.
  2. Antoine AD, Tepper BS (1969) Environmental control of glycogen and lipid content of Mycobacterium phlei. J Gen Microbiol 55: 217-226.
  3. Argüelles JC (2000) Physiological roles of trehalose in bacteria and yeasts: a comparative analysis. Arch Microbiol 174: 217-224.
  4. Ball S, Guan HP, James M, Myers A, Keeling P, et al. (1996) From glycogen to amylopectin: a model for the biogenesis of the plant starch granule. Cell 86: 349-352.
  5. Ball SG,Morell MK (2003) From bacterial glycogen to starch: understanding the biogenesis of the plant starch granule.Annu Rev Plant Biol 54: 207-233.
  6. Ballicora MA, Iglesias AA, Preiss J (2003) ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase, a regulatory enzyme for bacterial glycogen synthesis.MicrobiolMolBiol Rev 67: 213-225, table of contents.
  7. Baskaran S, Roach PJ, DePaoli-Roach AA, Hurley TD (2010) Structural basis for glucose-6-phosphate activation of glycogen synthase.ProcNatlAcadSci U S A 107: 17563-17568.
  8. Belanger AE,Hatfull GF (1999) Exponential-phase glycogen recycling is essential for growth of Mycobacterium smegmatis. J Bacteriol 181: 6670-6678.
  9. Belisle JT,Vissa VD, Sievert T, Takayama K, Brennan PJ, et al. (1997) Role of the major antigen of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in cell wall biogenesis. Science 276: 1420-1422.
  10. Berg S, Kaur D, Jackson M, Brennan PJ (2007) The glycosyltransferases of Mycobacterium tuberculosis- roles in the synthesis of arabinogalactan, lipoarabinomannan, and other glycoconjugates. Glycobiology 17: 35-56.
  11. Besra GS, Khoo KH, McNeil MR, Dell A, Morris HR, et al. (1995) A new interpretation of the structure of the mycolyl-arabinogalactan complex of Mycobacterium tuberculosis as revealed through characterization of oligoglycosylalditol fragments by fast-atom bombardment mass spectrometry and 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Biochemistry (Mosc.) 34:4257-4266.
  12. Bittencourt VC,Figueiredo RT, da Silva RB, Mourão-Sá DS, Fernandez PL, et al. (2006) An alpha-glucan of Pseudallescheriaboydii is involved in fungal phagocytosis and Toll-like receptor activation. J BiolChem 281: 22614-22623.
  13. Bolat I (2008) The importance of trehalose in brewing yeast survival. Innov. Romanian Food Biotechnol 2: 1-10.
  14. Bourassa L,Camilli A (2009) Glycogen contributes to the environmental persistence and transmission of Vibrio cholerae.MolMicrobiol 72: 124-138.
  15. Breton C,Snajdrová L, Jeanneau C, Koca J, Imberty A (2006) Structures and mechanisms of glycosyltransferases.Glycobiology 16: 29R-37R.
  16. Buléon A, Colonna P, Planchot V, Ball S (1998) Starch granules: structure and biosynthesis.Int J BiolMacromol 23: 85-112.
  17. Buschiazzo A,Ugalde JE, Guerin ME, Shepard W, Ugalde RA, et al. (2004) Crystal structure of glycogen synthase: homologous enzymes catalyze glycogen synthesis and degradation. EMBO J 23: 3196-3205.
  18. Calder PC (1991) Glycogen structure and biogenesis.Int J Biochem 23: 1335-1352.
  19. Carroll JD,Pastuszak I, Edavana VK, Pan YT, Elbein AD (2007) A novel trehalase from Mycobacterium smegmatis - purification, properties, requirements. FEBS J 274: 1701-1714.
  20. Chandra G,Chater KF, Bornemann S (2011) Unexpected and widespread connections between bacterial glycogen and trehalose metabolism. Microbiology 157: 1565-1572.
  21. Charnock SJ, Davies GJ (1999) Structure of the nucleotide-diphospho-sugar transferase, SpsA from Bacillus subtilis, in native and nucleotide-complexed forms. Biochemistry 38: 6380-6385.
  22. Chauhan DS, Chandra S, Gupta A, Singh TR (2012) Molecular modelling, docking and interaction studies of human-plasmogen and salmonella enolase with enolase inhibitors.Bioinformation 8: 185-188.
  23. Chen Q, Haddad GG (2004) Role of trehalose phosphate synthase and trehalose during hypoxia: from flies to mammals. J ExpBiol 207: 3125-3129.
  24. Cheng C, Mu J,Farkas I, Huang D, Goebl MG, et al. (1995) Requirement of the self-glucosylating initiator proteins Glg1p and Glg2p for glycogen accumulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15: 6632-6640.
  25. Chiu CP, Watts AG, Lairson LL, Gilbert M, Lim D, et al. (2004) Structural analysis of the sialyltransferaseCstII from Campylobacter jejuni in complex with a substrate analog. Nat StructMolBiol 11: 163-170.
  26. Cid E,Geremia RA, Guinovart JJ, Ferrer JC (2002) Glycogen synthase: towards a minimum catalytic unit? below FEBS Lett 528: 5-11.
  27. Crick DC,Mahapatra S, Brennan PJ (2001) Biosynthesis of the arabinogalactan-peptidoglycan complex of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.Glycobiology 11: 107R-118R.
  28. Cywes C, Hoppe HC, Daffé M, Ehlers MR (1997) Nonopsonic binding of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to complement receptor type 3 is mediated by capsular polysaccharides and is strain dependent. Infect. Immun. 65: 4258-4266.
  29. Dauvillée D,Kinderf IS, Li Z, Kosar-Hashemi B, Samuel MS, et al. (2005) Role of the Escherichia coli glgX gene in glycogen metabolism. J Bacteriol 187: 1465-1473.
  30. De Smet KA, Weston A, Brown IN, Young DB, Robertson BD (2000) Three pathways for trehalose biosynthesis in mycobacteria. Microbiology 146 : 199-208.
  31. Deutscher J, Francke C, Postma PW (2006) How phosphotransferase system-related protein phosphorylation regulates carbohydrate metabolism in bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. MMBR 70: 939-1031.
  32. Dinadayala P,Sambou T, Daffé M, Lemassu A (2008) Comparative structural analyses of the alpha-glucan and glycogen from Mycobacterium bovis.Glycobiology 18: 502-508.
  33. Elbein AD, Pan YT, Pastuszak I, Carroll D (2003) New insights on trehalose: a multifunctional molecule.Glycobiology 13: 17R-27R.
  34. Farkas I, Hardy TA, Goebl MG, Roach PJ (1991) Two glycogen synthase isoforms in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are coded by distinct genes that are differentially controlled. J. Biol. Chem. 266: 15602-15607.
  35. Flint J, Taylor E, Yang M, Bolam DN, Tailford LE, et al. (2005) Structural dissection and high-throughput screening of mannosylglycerate synthase. Nat StructMolBiol 12: 608-614.
  36. François J,Parrou JL (2001) Reserve carbohydrates metabolism in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Rev 25: 125-145.
  37. Gastinel LN, Bignon C, Misra AK, Hindsgaul O, Shaper JH, et al. (2001) Bovine alpha,3-galactosyltransferase catalytic domain structure and its relationship with ABO histo-blood group and glycosphingolipidglycosyltransferases. EMBO J. 20: 638-649.
  38. Geurtsen J, Chedammi S, Mesters J, Cot M, Driessen NN, et al. (2009) Identification of mycobacterial alpha-glucan as a novel ligand for DC-SIGN: involvement of mycobacterial capsular polysaccharides in host immune modulation. J Immunol 183: 5221-5231.
  39. Gagliardi MC, Lemassu A, Teloni R, Mariotti S, et al. (2007) Cell wall-associated alpha-glucan is instrumental for Mycobacterium tuberculosis to block CD1 molecule expression and disable the function of dendritic cell derived from infected monocyte. Cell. Microbiol9: 2081-2092.
  40. Gibson RP,Turkenburg JP, Charnock SJ, Lloyd R, Davies GJ (2002) Insights into trehalose synthesis provided by the structure of the retaining glucosyltransferaseOtsA.ChemBiol 9: 1337-1346.
  41. Ha S, Walker D, Shi Y, Walker S (2000) The 1.9Ao crystal structure of Escherichia coli MurG, a membrane-associated glycosyltransferase involved in peptidoglycan biosynthesis. Protein Sci. Publ. Protein Soc 9: 1045-1052.
  42. Hancock IC, Carman S, Besra GS, Brennan PJ, Waite E (2002) Ligation of arabinogalactan to peptidoglycan in the cell wall of Mycobacterium smegmatis requires concomitant synthesis of the two wall polymers. Microbiology 148: 3059-3067.
  43. Hengge-Aronis R, Fischer D (1992) Identification and molecular analysis of glgS, a novel growth-phase-regulated and rpoS-dependent gene involved in glycogen synthesis in Escherichia coli.MolMicrobiol 6: 1877-1886.
  44. Henrissat B,Deleury E, Coutinho PM (2002) Glycogen metabolism loss: a common marker of parasitic behaviour in bacteria? below Trends Genet 18: 437-440.
  45. Kakuda S, Shiba T, Ishiguro M, Tagawa H, Oka S, et al. (2004) Structural basis for acceptor substrate recognition of a human glucuronyltransferase, GlcAT-P, an enzyme critical in the biosynthesis of the carbohydrate epitope HNK-1. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 22693-22703.
  46. Kalscheuer R,Syson K, Veeraraghavan U, Weinrick B, Biermann KE, et al. (2010) Self-poisoning of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by targeting GlgE in an alpha-glucan pathway. Nat ChemBiol 6: 376-384.
  47. Koch A, Mizrahi V, Warner DF (2014) The impact of drug resistance on Mycobacterium tuberculosis physiology: what can we learn from rifampicin?. Emerging Microbes and Infections 3: e17.
  48. Lemassu A,Daffé M (1994) Structural features of the exocellular polysaccharides of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.Biochem J 297 : 351-357.
  49. Leung P, Lee YM, Greenberg E, Esch K, Boylan S, et al. (1986) Cloning and expression of the Escherichia coli glgC gene from a mutant containing an ADPglucosepyrophosphorylase with altered allosteric properties. J Bacteriol 167: 82-88.
  50. Lin K, Hwang PK, Fletterick RJ (1995) Mechanism of regulation in yeast glycogen phosphorylase. J BiolChem 270: 26833-26839.
  51. Makinoshima H,Aizawa S, Hayashi H, Miki T, Nishimura A, et al. (2003) Growth phase-coupled alterations in cell structure and function of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 185: 1338-1345.
  52. McMeechan A, Lovell MA, Cogan TA, Marston KL, Humphrey TJ, et al. (2005) Glycogen production by different Salmonella enterica serotypes: contribution of functional glgC to virulence, intestinal colonization and environmental survival. Microbiol. Read. Engl. 15: 3969-3977
  53. Mendes V, Maranha A, Alarico S, da Costa MS, Empadinhas N (2011) Mycobacterium tuberculosis Rv2419c, the missing glucosyl-3-phosphoglycerate phosphatase for the second step in methylglucose lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis. Sci. Rep. 1: 177.
  54. Montero M, Eydallin G, Viale AM, Almagro G, Muñoz FJ, et al. (2009) Escherichia coli glycogen metabolism is controlled by the PhoP-PhoQ regulatory system at submillimolar environmental Mg2+ concentrations, and is highly interconnected with a wide variety of cellular processes. Biochem. J. 424:129-141.
  55. Morán-Zorzano MT, Alonso-Casajús N, Muñoz FJ, Viale AM, Baroja-Fernández E, et al. (2007) Occurrence of more than one important source of ADPglucose linked to glycogen biosynthesis in Escherichia coli and Salmonella. FEBS Lett 581: 4423-4429.
  56. Morán-Zorzano MT, Montero M, Muñoz FJ, Alonso-Casajús N, Viale AM, (2008) Cytoplasmic Escherichia coli ADP sugar pyrophosphatase binds to cell membranes in response to extracellular signals as the cell population density increases. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 288: 25-32.
  57. Mulichak AM,Losey HC, Lu W, Wawrzak Z, Walsh CT, et al. (2003) Structure of the TDP-epi-vancosaminyltransferaseGtfA from the chloroeremomycin biosynthetic pathway.ProcNatlAcadSci U S A 100: 9238-9243.
  58. Ortalo-Magné A,Dupont MA, Lemassu A, Andersen AB, Gounon P, et al. (1995) Molecular composition of the outermost capsular material of the tubercle bacillus. Microbiology 141 : 1609-1620.
  59. Pal K, Kumar S, Sharma S, Garg SK, Alam MS, et al. (2010) Crystal structure of full-length Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv glycogen branching enzyme: insights of N-terminal beta-sandwich in substrate specificity and enzymatic activity. J. Biol. Chem 285: 20897-20903.
  60. Palomo M, Kralj S, van der Maarel, MJEC, Dijkhuizen L (2009) The unique branching patterns of Deinococcus glycogen branching enzymes are determined by their N-terminal domains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 1355-1362.
  61. Pedersen LC, Dong J, Taniguchi F, Kitagawa H, Krahn JM, et al. (2003) Crystal structure of an alpha ,4-N-acetylhexosaminyltransferase (EXTL2), a member of the exostosin gene family involved in heparansulfate biosynthesis. J BiolChem 278: 14420-14428.
  62. Pan YT,KorothEdavana V, Jourdian WJ, Edmondson R, Carroll JD, et al. (2004) Trehalose synthase of Mycobacterium smegmatis: purification, cloning, expression, and properties of the enzyme.Eur J Biochem 271: 4259-4269.
  63. Patenaude SI,Seto NO, Borisova SN, Szpacenko A, Marcus SL, et al. (2002) The structural basis for specificity in human ABO(H) blood group biosynthesis. Nat StructBiol 9: 685-690.
  64. Pederson BA, Cheng C, Wilson WA, Roach PJ (2000) Regulation of glycogen synthase. Identification of residues involved in regulation by the allosteric ligand glucose-6-P and by phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 27753-27761.
  65. Persson K, Ly HD, Dieckelmann M, Wakarchuk WW, Withers SG, et al. (2001) Crystal structure of the retaining galactosyltransferaseLgtC from Neisseria meningitidis in complex with donor and acceptor sugar analogs. Nat StructBiol 8: 166-175.
  66. Preiss J (2006) Bacterial Glycogen Inclusions: Enzymology and Regulation of Synthesis In: Shively DJM Inclusions in ProkaryotesSpringer Berlin Heidelberg 71-108.
  67. Preiss J, Romeo T (1994) Molecular biology and regulatory aspects of glycogen biosynthesis in bacteria.Prog Nucleic Acid Res MolBiol 47: 299-329.
  68. Ramaswamy NT, Li L, Khalil M, Cannon JF (1998) Regulation of yeast glycogen metabolism and sporulation by Glc7p protein phosphatase. Genetics 149: 57-72.
  69. Authors Rini J, Esko J, Varki A () Glycosyltransferases and Glycan-processing Enzymes. Glycosyltransferases and Glycan-processing Enzymes .
  70. Roach PJ, Cheng C, Huang D, Lin A, Mu J, et al. (1998) Novel aspects of the regulation of glycogen storage. J Basic ClinPhysiolPharmacol 9: 139-151.
  71. Schwebach JR, Glatman-Freedman A, Gunther-Cummins L, Dai Z, Robbins JB, et al. (2002) Glucan is a component of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis surface that is expressed in vitro and in vivo. Infect Immun 70: 2566-2575.
  72. Seibold GM, Breitinger KJ, Kempkes R, Both L, Krämer M, et al. (2011) The glgB-encoded glycogen branching enzyme is essential for glycogen accumulation in Corynebacteriumglutamicum. Microbiology 157: 3243-3251.
  73. Seok YJ, Koo BM, Sondej M, Peterkofsky A (2001) Regulation of E. coli glycogen phosphorylase activity by HPr. J MolMicrobiolBiotechnol 3: 385-393.
  74. Shriver Z, Raguram S, Sasisekharan R (2004) Glycomics: a pathway to a class of new and improved therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov 3: 863-873.
  75. Silljé HH, Paalman JW, terSchure EG, Olsthoorn SQ, Verkleij AJ, et al. (1999) Function of trehalose and glycogen in cell cycle progression and cell viability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 181: 396-400.
  76. Stadthagen S, Sambou T, Guerin M, Barilone N, Boudou F, et al. (2007) Genetic Basis for the Biosynthesis of Methylglucose Lipopolysaccharides in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Biol. Chem. 282: 27270-27276.
  77. Stokes RW, Norris-Jones R, Brooks DE, Beveridge TJ, Doxsee D, et al. (2004) The glycan-rich outer layer of the cell wall of Mycobacterium tuberculosis acts as an antiphagocytic capsule limiting the association of the bacterium with macrophages. Infect Immun 72: 5676-5686.
  78. Takayama K, Wang C, Besra GS (2005) Pathway to synthesis and processing of mycolic acids in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. ClinMicrobiol Rev 18: 81-101.
  79. Unligil UM, Rini JM (2000) Glycosyltransferase structure and mechanism. CurrOpinStructBiol 10: 510-517.
  80. Vrielink A, Rüger W, Driessen HP, Freemont PS (1994) Crystal structure of the DNA modifying enzyme beta-glucosyltransferase in the presence and absence of the substrate uridinediphosphoglucose. EMBO J 13: 3413-3422.
  81. Wilson WA, Roach PJ, Montero M, Baroja-Fernández E, Muñoz FJ, et al. (2010) Regulation of glycogen metabolism in yeast and bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 34: 952-985.
Citation: Gupta AK, Singh A, Singh S (2014) Glycogenomics of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mycobact Dis 4:175.

Copyright: © 2014 Gupta AK, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top