Journal of Nutrition & Food Sciences

Journal of Nutrition & Food Sciences
Open Access

ISSN: 2155-9600

+32 25889658

Research Article - (2014) Volume 0, Issue 0

Identification of Date Seeds Varieties Patterns to Optimize Nutritional Benefits of Date Seeds

Carine Platat*, Hosam M Habib, Fatima D AL Maqbali, Nada N Jaber and Wissam H Ibrahim
Nutrition and Health Department, College of Food and Agriculture, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, UAE
*Corresponding Author: Dr. Carine Platat, Department of Nutrition and Health, College of Food and Agriculture, United Arab Emirates University, P.O Box: 15551, Al Ain, UAE, Tel: +971-3-713 6025

Abstract

Bioactive compounds, like fibers and polyphenols, of plant products are recognized for their health benefits. A large amount of these bioactive compounds can be found in date seeds. The health benefit characteristic of such bioactive compounds depends on the type of food they are found in. However, further research is needed in examining how these compounds interact to give them these beneficial health effects. The aim of this study was to describe the macro, micro nutrients and polyphenols content, color and antioxidant properties of eighteen varieties of date seeds, and to examine how these parameters interact and identify patterns of varieties. Factorial analysis was performed to study the interrelations between these parameters and identify date seeds patterns. Overall, date seeds showed a great nutritional value, highlighting their enormous potential as a functional ingredient. Different patterns of nutritional, antioxidant and color parameters were identified, suggesting that the health benefit may vary according to the pattern of the date seeds variety.

Keywords: Date seeds; Antioxidant capacity; Patterns; Antioxidant compounds; Nutritional composition; Color

Introduction

Date seeds, which constitute 6-15% of the total weight of the ripe date, are largely produced in the Middle East and especially in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). In 2004, the world production of date seeds reached approximately 863 thousand tons. Although, a high nutritional value is well-recognized for date seeds they are being wasted in large quantities or used for animal (camels, cattle, sheep, and poultry) feed.

The nutritional value of date seeds is mainly related to a significant amount of dietary fiber and a high content of polyphenols [1,2]. Dietary fibers are particularly well-known for their potential benefits on cancer and type 2 diabetes prevention [3]. Polyphenols, including chemical compounds like phenolic and flavonoids, are common constituents of the human diet, with fruits and vegetables being the major dietary sources of these bioactive compounds. Their possible health benefits have been suggested to derive from their antioxidant properties by chelating redox-active metal ions, inactivating lipid free radical chain reactions, preventing hydro peroxide conversion into reactive oxradicals, and from their anti-inflammatory properties [4].

The current environment and trend to move toward a westernized diet and a sedentary lifestyle, have been associated with an overproduction of free radicals and reactive oxygen species (ROS) or insufficient ROS detoxification, contributing to oxidative stress in human. Oxidative stress is defined as an imbalance between the systemic manifestation of reactive oxygen species and a biological system’s ability to readily neutralize these compounds using antioxidant systems, leading to cell damages and cellular mechanisms disruptions. This has been associated to the development of cardiovascular diseases, obesity, diabetes and cancer. This emphasizes the importance of all natural antioxidants, including polyphenols, which are likely to strengthen the oxidative system in human body and prevent the development of chronic diseases, and contribute to health promotion [5].

The promising role of polyphenols is reinforced by experimental studies on animals and human cell lines, which demonstrated that they can contribute to the prevention of degenerative diseases, cancer, cardiovascular diseases and obesity as well [6,7].

Nonetheless, the nature and the intensity of the effects of polyphenols are likely to vary according to the chemical type of the polyphenol compound. Indeed, flavan-3-ols, including catechin and epicatechin which were the most abundant polyphenols detected in date seeds extract from Khalas variety, have been described in literature as having the highest beneficial health effects among the polyphenols. It has been suggested that the molecular target and the activated signaling pathway could vary from a polyphenol compound to another one, resulting to different protective effects [8].

One factor that is that is likely to affect the polyphenols’ profile in plant products and more generally the nutrient’s composition, is the cultivar. Indeed, since significant differences in nutritional and antioxidant properties between varieties have been commonly reported in other plant seeds [7], similar varietal differences can be expected in date seeds. In regards to the date palm, there are more than 100 known cultivars.

According to the variety, the polyphenolic profile, the nutritional properties, and the antioxidant properties, may differ and potentially result in different health impacts. In other words, this suggests that the interest of date seeds would depend on the variety of the seed and on the targeted health benefit. Overall, the field of varietal differences in the date seeds needs to be further studied.

Due to its high polyphenols content and nutritional value, date seeds represent a potential functional agent in the food industry, cosmetics and pharmaceuticals [9]. However, further research is needed to determine the specificities in terms of nutritional and antioxidant properties of each variety of date seed. This is due to the differences of the nutrients and polyphenols’ composition on antioxidant properties.

The objective of this research was to describe the macro, micro nutrients and polyphenols content, color and antioxidant properties of eighteen varieties of date seeds, and to identify the specificities of each variety.

Materials and Methods

Material

Date palm seeds of the following varieties; Khalas, Barhe, Lulu, Shikat alkahlas, Sokkery, Bomaan, Sagay, Shishi, Maghool, Sultana, Fard, Maktoomi, Naptit saif, Jabri, Kodary, Dabbas, Raziz, and Shabebe, were used in this study. All 18 varieties were obtained at the “tamr” stage (fully ripe dates), from a well-known commercial date pack house in the UAE (Al Ain Dates Factory) and were subjected to uniform harvest and post-harvest treatments [10]. The summer season is when the tamr is collected, and it is usually spread over a period of 2–3 months, i.e. the industry receives freshly harvested tamr batches over a 2-3- month period. With no preference to size, color, appearance or firmness, 5 kg from each of the seed varieties were collected randomly from tamr batches at the end of the season and were analyzed. After collection, the seeds were soaked in water, washed to get rid of any adhering date flesh, and then air-dried. Date seeds of each variety were separately ground to powder form in a heavy-duty grinder (IKA M 20 Universal Mill; IKA werke GmbH Co. KG, Staufen, Germany), and each sample was estimated in triplicate.

Methods

Extraction: The extraction of antioxidant compounds from 18 date seed varieties was carried out using methanol/H2O (50:50, v/v). The date palm seed variety sample (1 g) was extracted using 40 mL methanol/H2O (50:50, v/v).

Nutritional composition

Protein content: Total protein was determined by the Kjeldahl method. Protein was calculated using the general factor (6.25) [11].

Fat content: Fat was measured by extracting with light petroleum ether and then removing the solvent by distillation. The residue was dried at 1038C and the fat content determined gravimetrically.

Dietary fiber: Determination of dietary fiber was carried out using the AOAC enzymatic gravimetric official method (Method 991.43) [12].

Micronutrients composition: The levels in different minerals including Calcium (Ca), Phosphorus (P), Potassium (K), Magnesium (Mg), Iron (Fe), and zinc (Zn) were measured.

Samples were prepared for the determination of minerals as described by Heckman [13]. The minerals were determined using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (Varian- Vista-MPX; Varian, Inc. Palo Alto, CA, USA) as outlined in the manufacturer’s manual.

Antioxidant properties

Total phenolics content: Total phenolics were evaluated using the spectrophotometric analysis with Folin–Ciocalteu’s phenol reagent according to Kim [14]. The standard curve for total phenolics was made using gallic acid standard solution (0–100 mg/L) and total phenolics were expressed as mg of gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/100 g of date seed.

Total flavonoids content: Total flavonoids were determined using the method of Zhishen [15]. An aliquot (250 μl) of each extract or standard solution was mixed with 1.25 ml of H2O and 75 μl of 5% NaNO2 solution. After 6 min, 150 μl of 10% AlCl3 solution was added. After 5 min, 0.5 ml of 1 M NaOH solution was added and then the total volume was made up to 2.5 ml with H2O. The absorbance against blank was read at 510 nm. The results were expressed in terms of mg rutin equivalent (RE)/100 g date seed.

(+)-Catechin and (-)-Epicatechin contents: Determination (+)-catechin and (-)-epicatechin in date seeds extracts was performed according to the method of Satoh [16]. In brief, high-performance liquid chromatography equipped with 125 binary HPLC pump, 2475 fluorescence detector, 717 plus auto sampler and inline degasser AD was used (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA., USA). Reversephase separation was carried out using symmetry C18, 5 μm, and 4.6x150 mm column, equipped with a C18 precolumn. An 15-min isocratic elution was performed using mobile phase of 9% acetonitrile and 2% acetic acid with flow rate of 1ml/min. Detection was carried out using fluorescence detector set at λEX= 280nm and λEM= 315 nm. Catechin and epicatechin were quantified by external standard method. Plotting concentration (μg/mL) to peak area was set up by the calibration graphs.

Total antioxidant capacity: The total antioxidant capacity (TAC) of date seeds extracts was investigated according to the method of Prieto [17]. In brief, 0.1 ml of date seed extract was mixed with 0.3 ml of the reagent solution (0.6 M sulphuric acid, 28 mM sodium phosphate and 4 mM ammonium molybdate). The tubes were capped and the reaction mixture then incubated for 90 min at 95°C. The absorbance of the cooled mixture was measured at 695 nm against a blank. The blank contained the reagent solution and solvent. TAC was expressed as the absorbance of the sample. The higher absorbance value indicated higher antioxidant activity.

Superoxide radical (O2-) scavenging assay: Superoxide anion (O2-), the one-electron reduced form of molecular oxygen, is one of the most representative free radicals. Superoxide anion is a precursor to active free radicals that have the potential of reacting with biological macromolecules, and thereby inducing tissue damage [18,19]. In cellular oxidation reactions, superoxide radicals are normally formed first, and their effects can be magnified because they produce other kinds of cell-damaging free radicals and oxidizing agents.

Superoxide radical scavenging assay was determined as per the method described by Gao and Marklund [20,21]. O2- was generated from autoxidation reaction of pyrogallol. Eighty microliters of date seed extract was mixed with 80 μl of 50 mM Tris–HCl buffer (pH 8.3) containing 1 mM EDTA in a 96-well microplate followed by the addition of 40 μl of 1.5 mM pyrogallol in 10 mM HCl. The rate of O2- induced polymerisation of pyrogallol (ΔA/min s) was measured as increase in absorbance at 420 nm for 4 min at room temperature. Tris– HCl buffer was used instead of seed extract as blank (ΔA/ min c). All assays were performed in triplicate, and the scavenging activity of the seed extract was calculated using

Activity = [(ΔA/ min c - ΔA/ min s) / ΔA/min c] x 100%

Ferric-reducing antioxidant power assay (FRAP): FRAP assay depends on the reduction of ferric tripyridyltriazine (Fe (III)-TPTZ) complex to the ferrous tripyridyltriazine (Fe (II)-TPTZ) by a reductant (antioxidants or other reducing agents) at low pH. Fe (II)-TPTZ has an intensive blue color and can be monitored at 593 nm. FRAP was performed according to the method of Benzie and Strain [22] with slight modifications. The FRAP reagent included 10 mM TPTZ solution in 40 mM HCl, 20 mM FeCl3 solution and 0.3 M acetate buffer (pH 3.6) in proportions of 1:1:10(v/v/v). 50 μL of diluted methanolic extracts were mixed with 3 mL of freshly prepared FRAP reagent and the reaction mixtures incubated at 37°C for 30 min. Absorbance was determined at 593 nm against distilled water blank. Aqueous solutions of ferrous sulfate (100–2000 μM) were used for calibration. Triplicate measurements were taken and the FRAP values were expressed as μmol of ferrous equivalent (FE)/100 g of date seed.

DPPH free radical-scavenging assay: The antioxidant activities of the seeds extracts were also studied through the evaluation of the free radical-scavenging effect on the 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical. DPPH is a free radical and stable at room temperature, which produces a violet solution in ethanol. Reduction of DPPH by antioxidants results in a loss of absorbance. Thus, the degree of discoloration of the solution indicates the scavenging efficiency of the added substances. The use of DPPH provided an easy and rapid way to evaluate antioxidant activity.

The determination was based on the method proposed by De Ancos [23]. An aliquot (10 μl) of seed extract was mixed with 90 μl of distilled water and 3.9 ml of 0.25 mM DPPH in methanol. The mixture was thoroughly vortex-mixed and kept in the dark for 30 min. The absorbance was later measured at 515 nm, against a blank of methanol without DPPH. Results were expressed as percentage of inhibition of the DPPH radical. Percentage of inhibition of the DPPH radical was calculated according to the following equation:

% inhibition of DPPH = [(Abs control - Abs sample)/ Abs control] x 100 where Abs control is the absorbance of DPPH solution without extracts.

Color: The color of date seeds sample was measured with a TC-PIIG automatic color difference meter using a Hunter Lab model (ColorFex; Hunter Associates Laboratory Inc., USA). Color measurements were expressed as tristimulus parameters, L*, a*, and b*. L* indicates lightness (100= white and 0 =black). a* indicates redness–greenness and b* indicates yellowness–blueness [24].

Statistical Analysis: Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for windows (version 20; SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA).

Univarate analysis: All analytical determinations were performed in triplicate. Means ± standard deviation were calculated. Correlation coefficients were calculated to study the relationship between nutritional characteristics, antioxidant properties, and color parameters of the eighteen varieties of date seeds. Spearman coefficient was used. The statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

Multivariate analysis: Factor analysis was used to identify major patterns of date seeds varieties based on their nutritional characteristics (protein, dietary fiber and fat contents), antioxidant properties (total phenolics, total polyohenols, catechin and epicatechin levels, FRAP, DDPH, Superoxide inhibition and TAC) and color parameters (L, A and B) and some nutritional characteristics (protein, fiber and fat contents).

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was done with the factors rotated by orthogonal transformation. The purpose of this method is to determine the axes or planes that provide the most informative graphical representation of the relationships between the variables listed above. The ability of an axis to describe the layout is quantified by the percentage of information represented by this axis and by its eigenvalue. The natural interpretation of the components or factors in conjunction with eigenvalues (≥1.5) and Scree plot determined whether a factor should be retained or not. The derived factors (pattern) were labelled on the basis of our interpretation of data and on prior literature. Each date seed variety received a score for each identified pattern.

Results

Nutritional characteristics: The level of different macro and micro nutrients (protein, fat, dietary fibers, calcium, potassium, phosphorus, magnesium, iron and zinc) are presented in Tables 1 and 2. These results were previously described elsewhere.

  Protein   Dietary Fiber   Fat  
  Mean sd Mean sd Mean sd
All varieties            
Khalas 5.84h 0.01 72.72efgh 0.26 7.92g 0.06
Barhe 5.68ef 0.01 72.69efgh 0.22 7.52ef 0.05
Lulu 5.14b 0.35 70.05b 0.03 7.37e 0.06
Shikat alkahlas 5.32c 0.35 72.70efgh 0.01 7.39e 0.01
Sokkery 6.43i 0.01 70.40bc 0.74 6.52c 0.09
Bomaan 5.38c 0.01 74.00gh 0.22 6.42bc 0.02
Sagay 5.3c 0.01 73.28efgh 0.61 5.71a 0.08
Shishi 5.70fg 0.02 73.07efgh 0.45 6.20b 0.11
Maghool 5.55de 0.01 73.36efgh 0.96 6.52c 0.01
Sultana 5.18b 0.01 74.05gh 0.28 6.64c 0.01
Fard 5.82gh 0.08 74.20h 0.15 6.51c 0.06
Maktoomi 5.83h 0.01 72.07def 0.16 7.53ef 0.01
Naptit saif 5.70fg 0.01 72.87efgh 0.01 6.92d 0.04
Jabri 5.42cd 0.08 73.47fgh 0.42 7.07d 0.11
Khodary 5.36c 0.04 72.52efg 0.32 7.68fg 0.01
Dabbas 5.13b 0.03 70.89bcd 0.21 6.93d 0.02
Raziz 6.93j 0.04 67.56a 0.37 8.77h 0.01
Shabebe 4.81a 0.01 71.80cde 0.07 7.73fg 0.16
*Tukey test was peformed to compare varieties. Different letters denote significant differences, p<0.05

Table 1: Nutritional characteristics of eighteen varieties of date seeds: macronutrients content (g/100g). Means and sd are presented.*

  Ca   P   K   Mg   Fe   Zn  
  Mean sd Mean sd Mean sd Mean Sd Mean sd Mean sd
All varieties                        
Khalas 34.00j 0.09 133.29gh 0.02 202.19bc 0.01 63.55abc 0.12 3.44j 0.10 1.45abc 0.13
Barhe 30.05i 0.05 122.97def 0.01 222.19cde 0.01 73.21defgh 0.01 3.15i 0.08 1.63c 0.01
Lulu 19.89de 0.25 134.05h 2.72 204.22bcd 1.05 68.51bcde 1.05 1.63bcd 0.03 1.40abc 0.14
Shikat alkahlas 20.73def 0.54 125.82efg 1.02 217.58cde 1.93 86.10ij 1.93 1.82de 0.04 1.13ab 0.02
Sokkery 14.64ab 1.09 116.87abcd 0.87 217.92cde 2.02 67.47abcde 2.02 2.43h 0.06 1.30abc 0.15
Bomaan 25.06h 1.07 122.39cdef 0.31 206.82bcd 2.91 77.01fgh 2.91 2.14g 0.05 1.53bc 0.08
Sagay 16.85bc 0.65 121.84cdef 0.10 216.71cde 4.98 65.40abcd 4.98 2.21gh 0.04 1.54bc 0.19
Shishi 13.83a 0.21 120.24bcde 0.12 209.49bcd 1.23 71.57cdefg 1.23 2.13g 0.02 1.55bc 0.17
Maghool 22.70efgh 0.06 146.50i 3.01 240.23e 0.55 74.92efgh 0.55 5.05k 0.04 1.62c 0.08
Sultana 18.00cd 0.21 134.68h 0.38 222.47cde 1.56 77.61ghi 1.56 1.40ab 0.02 1.02a 0.03
Fard 24.21gh 0.05 115.95abcd 0.76 238.79e 1.82 72.40defgh 1.82 2.12fg 0.10 1.63c 0.22
Maktoomi 20.60def 0.20 173.07j 0.26 240.54e 3.44 89.66j 3.44 1.52abc 0.07 1.35abc 0.02
Naptit saif 16.13abc 1.43 127.92fgh 0.05 188.91ab 3.28 76.72fgh 3.28 1.85def 0.17 1.31abc 0.09
Jabri 13.41fgh 0.47 146.77i 2.32 226.28de 0.88 81.14hij 0.88 2.01efg 0.10 1.20abc 0.01
Khodary 21.81efg 0.86 115.34abc 1.32 213.25cd 1.26 58.76a 1.26 1.36ab 0.06 1.42abc 0.13
Dabbas 24.55gh 1.10 127.91fgh 3.13 225.98cde 0.53 62.68ab 0.53 1.32a 0.04 1.22abc 0.08
Raziz 20.11de 1.24 110.09a 4.65 175.02a 2.83 69.54bcdefg 2.83 3.01i 0.01 1.23abc 0.14
Shabebe 24.42gh 0.32 113.86ab 2.38 239.40e 1.49 67.63bcde 1.49 1.71cd 0.01 1.27abc 0.05
*Tukey test was peformed to compare varieties. Different letters denote significant differences, p<0.05

Table 2: Nutritional characteristics of eighteen varieties of date seeds: micronutrients content (mg/100g). Means and sd are presented.*

Antioxidant and color characteristics: Polyphenols content (total phenols, total flavonoids, catechin and epicatechin) and color are described in Table 3.

  Total Phenolics (mg GAE/100g) Total Flavonoids (mg RE/100g) Catechin (mg /100g) Epicatechin (mg /100g) L A B
  Mean s.d. Mean s.d. Mean s.d. Mean s.d. Mean s.d. Mean s.d. Mean s.d.
All varieties 3411.81 717.41 13327.38 4621.85 5.71 2.41 0.72 0.35 48.10 1.04 11.80 1.04 18.53 1.20
Khalas 2459.75b 0.22 6213.33a 247.40 0.76a 0.02 1.16i 0.11 47.23c 0.09 8.43a 0.19 15.13a 0.19
Barhe 1864.82a 12.63 7510.67b 246.13 2.15b 0.04 0.39bc 0.02 48.52tg 0.07 10.13b 0.14 16.70b 0.15
Lulu 2923.11e 1.27 9065.33c 410.66 3.96d 0.06 0.56de 0.01 48.47tg 0.11 11.25c 0.18 16.80b 0.12
Shikat alkahlas 3129.16h 0.61 10997.33d 286.62 2.76e 0.13 0.51cde 0.01 48.32t 0.11 11.5cd 0.13 17.65c 0.16
Sokkery 3637.45k 0.45 18179.67h 194.42 8.80m 0.11 0.82tg 0.02 48.55tg 0.05 11.95et 0.04 18.53de 0.06
Bomaan 2957.95g 0.69 1810.80h 99.48 5.78g 0.03 1.51j 0.09 47.48d 0.06 12.32ghij 0.07 19.20g 0.09
Sagay 3984.20n 0.00 21673.33i 105.10 7.83k 0.02 0.98h 0.02 47.62d 0.03 12.51ij 0.04 19.29gh 0.05
Shishi 4087.90o 0.00 15017.33t 198.08 8.12l 0.14 0.64et 0.01 48.59g 0.09 11.89t 0.13 18.82ef 0.13
Maghool 2940.66t 0.23 9537.33c 180.24 8.96m 0.06 0.80tg 0.04 50.21i 0.05 11.63e 0.04 19.28gh 0.05
Sultana 3986.63n 1.83 14656.00t 98.31 6.06h 0.06 0.36bc 0.03 46.91b 0.03 12.55ij 0.04 19.27gh 0.08
Fard 4426.72p 1.15 16113.33g 387.74 6.74j 0.05 0.49cde 0.04 46.67a 0.05 12.16tgh 0.09 19.28gh 0.09
Maktoomi 3849.92l 0.69 9261.33c 334.72 4.4e 0.01 0.47cde 0.01 48.04e 0.1 12.22tgh 0.13 18.43d 0.09
Naptit saif 3422.71j 2.79 12260.00e 134.40 7.86k 0.13 0.9gh 0.06 48.92h 0.03 11.96etg 0.07 19.27gh 0.13
Jabri 3860.35m 0.69 16049.33g 95.44 7.77k 0.03 1.05ht 0.13 47.22c 0.13 12.53ij 0.14 18.81def 0.19
Khodary 4768.87q 1.61 18157.33h 194.09 7.69k 0.02 1.15i 0.04 46.54a 0.03 12.59j 0.1 18.60de 0.17
Dabbas 2848.16c 1.28 5994.67a 112.09 2.66c 0.05 0.19a 0.01 47.58d 0.13 13.06k 0.23 19.81i 0.20
Raziz 2866.56d 0.83 18186.67h 100.66 5.04t 0.06 0.31ab 0.01 48.89gh 0.03 12.11tg 0.01 19.08fg 0.03
Shabebe 3397.66i 0.46 12912.00e 128.31 6.49t 0.02 0.62de 0.02 50.10i 0.05 11.68de 0.06 19.60hi 0.03
*Tukey test was peformed to compare varieties. Different letters denote significant differences, p<0.05

Table 3: Antioxidant and color characteristics of eighteen varieties of date seeds. Means and sd are presented.*

On average, the phenolic content was 3411.81 ± 717.41 mg GAE/100 g, with Khodary variety having the highest total phenolic content (4768.87 mg GAE/100g seeds), and Barhe variety having the lowest phenolic content (1864.82 mg GAE/100 g seeds).

The average of total flavonoids content was 13327.38 ± 4621.85 mg RE/100 g, with Sagay variety having the highest total flavonoid content (21673 mg RE/100 g seed) and Dabbas variety having the lowest total flavonoid content (5995 mg RE/100 g seed).

The average contents of catechin and epicatechin were of 5.71 ± 2.41 mg/100 g and 0.72 ± 0.35 mg/100 g, respectively (Table 1). Across the different varieties, Maghool possessed the highest content of (+)-catechin (8.96 mg/100 g date seeds), while Khalas had the lowest one (0.76 mg/100 g date seeds). On the other hand, the (-)-epicatechin content was highest for Bomaan (1.51 mg/100 g date seeds) and lowest for Dabbas (0.19 mg/100 g date seeds).

The averages of L, a, and b were 48.10 ± 1.04, 11.80 ± 1.04, and 18.53 ± 1.20 respectively. Khodary had the lowest lightness score, whereas Maghool had the highest one. Khalas presented both the lowest redness-greenness and yellowness-blueness scores. Dabbas had the highest redness-greenness score and Shabebe the highest yellownessblueness score.

Antioxidant properties

Date seeds extracts were found to possess significant total antioxidant capacity, with an average in the 18 varieties of 0.04 ± 0.02 nm (Table 4). Sultana variety had the highest antioxidant effect (0.102 nm), while Barhe (0.012) had the lowest antioxidant effect.

  Total Antioxidant capacity (OD, nm) Superoxide
(% inhibition)
FRAP
(µmol of FE/100g)
DPPH
(% inhibition)
  Mean s.d. Mean s.d. Mean s.d. Mean s.d.
All Varieties 0.04 0.02 48.40 5.07 157654.25 52326.08 45.53 7.66
Khalas 0.02b <0.01 45.70bcd 1.56 75627.20b 526.70 41.61d 0.08
Barhe 0.01a <0.01 42.14b 1.07 62554.93a 434.48 29.44a 0.03
Lulu 0.03bc <0.01 48.50cde 1.49 82406.53c 480.84 42.65e 0.02
Shikat alkahlas 0.03bcd <0.01 50.64defg 1.63 108488.93e 193.71 62.90m 0.77
Sokkery 0.03bc <0.01 53.05efgh 1.63 183802.80j 388.09 44.43g 0.02
Bomaan 0.05gh <0.01 44.57bc 1.10 137681.87g 348.50 42.85e 0.00
Sagay 0.05fgh <0.01 56.39h 2.58 222569.20n 219.07 52.73k 0.01
Shishi 0.04fg <0.01 48.43cde 1.59 171449.07i 762.89 47.18i 0.02
Maghool 0.03bc <0.01 47.73cd 1.20 159825.07h 203.22 35.57b 0.02
Sultana 0.10j <0.01 47.77cd 1.51 210160.27m 621.99 48.81j 0.01
Fard 0.05h <0.01 55.32gh 1.95 198639.20i 15.24 53.70i 0.03
Maktoomi 0.04fg <0.01 44.47bc 1.56 102144.13d 170.67 43.03e 0.03
Naptit Saif 0.04def <0.01 48.28cde 2.13 199638.13i 576.56 42.65e 0.01
Jabri 0.05h <0.01 53.59fgh 1.25 221595.73n 724.60 43.68f 0.02
Khodary 0.05gh <0.01 35.27a 1.28 221467.07n 509.95 53.08k 0.04
Dabbas 0.03cde <0.01 50.67defg 2.08 159552.27h 675.46 53.16kl 0.02
Raziz 0.07i 0.01 48.98cdef 1.19 188095.60k 538.92 45.32h 0.00
Shabebe 0.04ef <0.01 49.72def 1.61 132078.53f 108.76 36.71c 0.00
*Tukey test was peformed to compare varieties. Different letters denote significant differences, p<0.05

Table 4: Antioxidant capacities of eighteen varieties of date seeds. Means and sd are presented*.

On average, the % superoxide inhibition was 48.40 ± 5.07. Sagay had the highest scavenging effects (56.39% inhibition); while Khodary had the lowest scavenging effects (35.27% inhibition).

The average FRAP was 157654.25 ± 52326.08 μmol of FE/100g. The Sagay variety had the highest effect of FRAP (222569 μmol FE/100 g), while Barhe had the lowest effect (62555 μmol FE/100 g).

The average % inhibition of DPPH was 45.53 ± 7.66. Fard possessed the highest DPPH scavenging activity with an estimated value of 53.70%, while Barhe possessed the lowest DPPH scavenging activity with an estimated value of 29.44% (Table 5).

  Protein Fiber Fat Ca P K Mg Fe Zn
Protein 1 -0.03 0.07 -0.12 -0.10 -0.22 0.09 0.60* 0.30
Fiber -0.03 1 -0.60** -0.04 0.26 0.21 0.43 0.15 0.28
Fat 0.07 -0.60** 1 0.35 -0.04 -0.10 -0.12 -0.14 -0.34
Ca -0.12 -0.04 0.35 1 -0.11 0.12 -0.22 0.13 0.32
P -0.10 0.26 -0.04 -0.11 1 0.28 0.53* -0.12 -0.17
K -0.22 0.21 -0.10 0.12 0.28 1 0.28 -0.21 -0.10
Mg 0.09 0.43 -0.12 -0.22 0.53* 0.28 1 -0.3 -0.19
Fe 0.60* 0.15 -0.14 0.13 -0.12 -0.21 -0.3 1 0.53*
Zn 0.30 0.28 -0.34 0.32 -0.17 -0.10 -0.19 0.53* 1
*Spearman’s correlation coefficients were calculated. Statistical significance set at p<0.05, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001

Table 5: Correlations between nutritional parameters among 18 varieties of date seeds.*

Correlations between nutritional, polyphenols content, color and antioxidant properties

Correlations between nutritional parameters are described in Table 6. Dietary fibers and fat content showed a significant negative correlation. By contrast, protein and iron levels, phosphorus and magnesium, and finally, iron and zinc were positively correlated.

  Total Phenolic Total flavonoid Catechin Epicatechin L a B TAC Superoxide FRAP DPPH
Total Phenolics 1 0.59* 0.61** 0.21 -0.39 0.52* 0.491* 0.63** 0.20 0.70** 0.53*
Total flavonoids 0.59* 1 0.58* 0.30 -0.12 0.42 0.581* 0.73** 0.34 0.73** 0.38
Catechin 0.61** 0.58* 1 0.38 0.27 0.22 0.659** 0.33 0.26 0.67** 0.04
Epicatechin 0.21 0.30 0.38 1 -0.16 -0.03 0.174 0.03 -0.12 0.21 -0.22
L -0.39 -0.12 0.27 -0.16 1 -0.54* 0.20 -0.37 0.01 -0.28 -0.52*
A 0.52* 0.42 0.22 -0.03 -0.54* 1 0.207 0.70** 0.17 0.70** 0.57*
B 0.49* 0.58* 0.66** 0.17 0.20 0.21 1 0.61* 0.26 0.56* -0.01
TAC 0.63** 0.73** 0.33 0.03 -0.37 0.70** 0.61* 1 0.17 0.75** 0.43
Superoxide 0.20 0.34 0.26 -0.12 0.01 0.17 0.259 0.17 1 0.41 0.46
FRAP 0.70** 0.73** 0.67** 0.21 -0.28 0.70** 0.562* 0.75** 0.41 1 0.49*
DPPH 0.53* 0.38 0.04 -0.22 -0.52* 0.57* -0.011 0.43 0.46 0.49* 1
*Spearman’s correlation coefficients were calculated. Statistical significance set at p<0.05, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001

Table 6: Correlations between phenolics, flavonoids, catechin, epicatechin, antioxidant capacity and color among 18 varieties of date seeds.*

Spearman correlation coefficients between polyphenols content, color and antioxidant properties are presented in Table 7. Total phenolics were positively and significantly correlated with the total antioxidant capacity, FRAP, and DPPH. Total flavonoids were positively and significantly related to the total antioxidant capacity and FRAP. Catechin was positively and significantly related to FRAP. In contrast, epicatechin was not correlated to any parameter. A lower lightness was associated with higher redness-greenness and higher DPPH. Results showed that the higher the redness-greenness color, resulted in higher phenolics, total antioxidant capacity, FRAP and DPPH. The higher the yellowness-blueness color, the higher the content of phenolics, flavonoids, catechin, total antioxidant capacity, and FRAP.

  Total Phenolic Total flavonoid Catechin Epicatechin L a B TAC Superoxide FRAP DPPH
Protein -0.01 0.21 0.16 0.09 0.13 -0.23 -0.08 -0.03 -0.12 -0.01 -0.13
Fiber 0.44 0.18 0.31 0.32 -0.40 0.22 0.48* 0.37 0.04 0.39 0.12
Fat -0.42 -0.33 -0.58* -0.20 0.05 -0.25 -0.41 -0.19 -0.37 -0.40 -0.25
Ca -0.55* -0.46 -0.63* -0.08 -0.14 -0.24 -0.23 -0.37 -0.25 -0.61* -0.25
P -0.16 -0.58* -0.14 0.01 -0.11 -0.03 -0.29 -0.25 -0.05 -0.19 -0.28
K 0.22 -0.20 0.13 -0.29 -0.06 0.19 0.18 -0.05 0.17 -0.02 -0.01
Mg 0.10 -0.10 0.01 -0.15 0.06 -0.04 0.14 0.17 -0.13 -0.07 -0.09
Fe -0.36 0.15 0.17 0.28 0.37 -0.55* 0.13 -0.26 -0.01 -0.14 -0.45
Zn 0.01 0.01 0.17 0.27 0.06 -0.32 0.15 -0.22 -0.26 -0.17 -0.30
*Spearman’s correlation coefficients were calculated. Statistical significance set at p<0.05, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001

Table 7: Correlations between color, nutritional and antioxidant parameters among 18 varieties of date seeds.*

A higher yellowness-blueness color was related to a lower level of dietary fiber. Also, if the catechin content was high, the fat content would be low. The results also showed that the higher the calcium content, the higher the total phenolics and catechin contents, but lower FRAP content. Phosphorus and total flavonoids were inversely correlated. Iron was only inversely related to redness-greenness color. Magnesium and zinc were not related to any of the antioxidant parameters.

Factorial analysis: identification of nutrition, antioxidant and color based patterns for date seeds

Factorial analysis identified two main factors with eigenvalues of 5.84 and 2.83 for factor 1 and factor 2, respectively. The two factors were explaining almost 45% of total variance. The matrix of components scores is in Table 8.

Component 1 2
Eigenvalue
% of variance explained
5.84
29.19
2.83
14.14
Total Phenolics 0.86 0.04
Total Flavonoids 0.81 0.03
Catechin 0.77 0.40
Epicatechin 0.18 0.51
L -0.31 0.20
a 0.79 -0.20
B 0.52 0.41
TAC 0.69 -0.30
Superoxide 0.34 -0.02
FRAP 0.89 -0.06
DPPH 0.51 -0.44
Protein -0.05 -0.21
Fiber 0.27 0.69
Fat -0.52 -0.55
Ca -0.77 0.09
P -0.15 0.26
K 0.07 0.45
Mg 0.08 0.17
Fe -0.42 0.50
Zn -0.22 0.70
Factorial analysis with Principal Component Analysis and orthogonal rotation was performed. Absolute Eigenvalue ≥0.5 is bolded

Table 8: Matrix for the two extracted components.*

The first factor was determined by total phenolics, total flavonoids, catechin, a, b, TAC, FRAP, DPPH in a positive manner and with fat, calcium in a negative manner.

The second factor was determined by epicatechin, dietary fibers, iron, and zinc in a positive way and by fat in a negative way.

The correlations of the eighteen date seeds varieties with these two factors enabled the identifications of the specificities of the different varieties and to highlight 4 different patterns of date seeds varieties. The results are presented in Figure 1. Some varieties, including Sagay, Fard, Sultana, Jabri and Khodary were mainly characterized by high levels of phenolics, flavonoids, catechin, higher redness-greenness color, higher yellowness-blueness color, higher TAC, FRAP, and DPPH, but low fat and calcium contents. However, for the Khalas and Barhe varieties it was the opposite. The Maghool variety was stood out because it was strongly associated with high epicatechin, dietary fibers, iron, and zinc contents but with low fat level. By contrast, the Shikat alkahlas, Dabbas and Raziz varieties were characterized by low epicatechin, dietary fibers, iron, and zinc contents, but by high fat level. These results were confirmed by conducting a cluster analysis used to classify the different varieties according to the same nutritional and antioxidant parameters as those which were considered in the previous factorial analysis.

nutrition-food-sciences-Date-seeds-patterns

Figure 1: Date seeds patterns based on nutritional, antioxidant and color characteristics.*

Discussion

This work is the first of its kind to describe the nutritional and antioxidant properties, color of 18 different varieties of date seeds, and to determine the specificities of each variety of date seeds. Particularly high levels of dietary fibers, phenolics, and flavonoids were obtained as well as high antioxidant activities, as evidenced by both strong reducing power and radical-scavenging capacity. Interestingly, combinations of nutritional and antioxidant specificities were identified in date seeds varieties. Some varieties were better characterized by their fat and calcium contents, antioxidant components, antioxidant effects, yellowness-blueness and redness-greenness color; whereas the others were rather characterized by epicatechin, dietary fibers, iron and zinc contents.

The nutritional characteristics of the same date seeds varieties have already been discussed in details somewhere else and emphasized the particularly high content in dietary fibers. This is interesting in terms of prevention of chronic diseases like cardiovascular diseases or diabetes [3].

The polyphenolic compounds content and antioxidant effects of the date seeds were additionally studied in this work. The findings which were obtained are in agreement with the results reported by other studies previously conducted on date seeds [25-27]. Remarkably, the content of polyphenols and the antioxidant activity were much higher, up to 10-fold, in date seeds compared to date fruits, but also compared to other popular dietary antioxidant-rich food products like tea extract or some other by-products like grape seeds [17,25,28].

The strength of this work is to have discriminated the date seeds varieties on the basis of their nutritional, antioxidant, and color properties, and to have determined which nutritional and antioxidant properties better characterize each variety. In this way, it was possible to highlight group or patterns of varieties on the basis of their nutritional, antioxidant and color properties. These parameters were interrelated in date seeds but in a different manner according to the variety. These differences can be explained by different factors such as; genetic, environmental and agricultural factors including time of harvest, postharvest treatments, fertilizers, quality of irrigation water, and variable soil mineral availability. In regards to polyphenols, the presence of water-soluble compounds with different free radical-scavenging effects, such as phenolics and flavonoids, could help explain the differences obtained, in particular for superoxide anion (O2-) scavenging power, FRAP and DPPH. Indeed, these compounds, especially catechin and epicatechin, are the first to be oxidized contributing to a lower radicalscavenging activity. This process has already been described by Chaira [29].

On a side note, it appeared as though some varieties were better characterized by their fat and calcium contents, antioxidant components, antioxidant effects, and yellowness-blueness and redness-greenness color. Not surprisingly, phenolics and flavonoids were strongly and positively related to the antioxidant capacities, both radical scavenging and reducing powers. Interestingly, catechin but not epicatechin, was positively correlated with reducing the radical scavenging powers. This may be related to the relatively low concentration of epicatechin in date seeds compared to other plant products.

The varieties presenting the highest antioxidant capacity are also those with the lowest amount of fat, which is particularly important in the purpose of the use of date seeds as a functional ingredient. The date seeds that contained the highest levels of phenolics and flavonoids enabled the maximum antioxidant effect of polyphenols by minimizing fat intake and hence contribute to prevention of diseases like cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and cancer. This is said to be the cause of the potent antioxidant and anticancer activities of phenolics and flavonoids [30].

Our results suggest that the color of the date seeds can be used as an indicator of the nutritional and antioxidant properties. Indeed, colorfulness seems to indicate higher content of phenolics, flavonoids and catechin, higher TAC, FRAP and DPPH, but a lower fat and calcium. Color parameters were only recently considered in the study of antioxidant properties of food, and our results are in accordance with other studies related to cereal products such as rice or fruits such as pomegranate [31,32]. Coloration has been related to anthocyanins, which were not measured in our work. Nonetheless, a higher level can be expected in darker varieties compared to lighter ones.

On the other hand, other varieties were better characterized by their epicatechin, dietary fibers, fat, iron, and zinc levels; with the highest contents in epicatechin, dietary fibers, zinc, and iron being observed in the same varieties as those with the lowest fat level. Metal minerals have been demonstrated to play a significant beneficial role in oxidative stress and inflammation in many chronic diseases [33]. Knowing this and considering the known health benefits of fibers; the combination of these nutritional properties in the same varieties, make these latters good candidate for prevention and management of diseases related to oxidative stress. Further, this information can be used in the prevention of diseases more related to the effect of dietary fibers like diabetes and gastrointestinal cancers.

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that date seeds could be a potential promising candidate for future pharmaceutical application or functional food in order to prevent and treat illnesses and improve overall health, according to their nutritional and antioxidant characteristics. But, interestingly, it indicated also that this potential varied among the date seeds varieties, with different nutritional and antioxidant profiles. This is of a particularly great importance, when considering a specific health purpose, for the selection of date seeds varieties, single or combination of varieties, in the development of functional food. Further research is needed to start developing functional products based on date seeds and to test the effect of single varieties and combinations of varieties.

References

  1. Habib HM, Ibrahim WH (2009) Nutritional quality evaluation of eighteen date pit varieties. Int J Food Sci Nutr 60 Suppl 1: 99-111.
  2. Habib HM, Ibrahim WH (2011) Effect of date seeds on oxidative damage and antioxidant status in vivo. J Sci Food Agric 91: 1674-1679.
  3. Al-Farsi M, Chang Yong Lee (2008a) Optimization of phenolics and dietary fiber extraction from date seeds. J Food Chem 3: 977-985.
  4. Anderson JW, Baird P, Davis RH Jr, Ferreri S, Knudtson M, et al. (2009) Health benefits of dietary fiber. Nutr Rev 67: 188-205.
  5. Joseph JA, Shukitt-Hale B, Casadesus G (2005) Reversing the deleterious effects of aging on neuronal communication and behavior: Beneficial properties of fruit polyphenolic compounds. Am J Clin Nutr 81: 313S-316S.
  6. Limón-Pacheco J, Gonsebatt ME (2009) The role of antioxidants and antioxidant-related enzymes in protective responses to environmentally induced oxidative stress. Mutat Res 674: 137-147.
  7. Wojcik M, Burzynska-Pedziwiatr I, Wozniak LA (2010) A review of natural and synthetic antioxidants important for health and longevity. Curr Med Chem 17: 3262-3288.
  8. Baiano A, Terracone C (2011) Varietal differences among the phenolic profiles and antioxidant activities of seven table grape cultivars grown in the south of Italy based on chemometrics. J Agric Food Chem 59: 9815-9826.
  9. Andriantsitohaina R, Auger C, Chataigneau T, Étienne-Selloum N, Li H, et al. (2012) Molecular mechanisms of the cardiovascular protective effects of polyphenols. Br J Nutr 108: 1532-1549.
  10. Masaki H (2010) Role of antioxidants in the skin: anti-aging effects. J Dermatol Sci 58: 85-90.
  11. Barreveld WH (1993) Date Palm Products. FAO Agricultural Services Bulletin no. 101. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
  12. El-Shurafa MY, Ahmed HS, Abou-Naji SE (1982) Organic and inorganic constituent of dates palm pit (seeds). Journal of Date Palm 2: 275-284.
  13. AOAC (2003) Official methods of analyses. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
  14. Heckman M (1971) Collaborative study of a copper in feeds by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 54: 666-668.
  15. Kim DO, Chun OK, Kim YJ, Moon HY, Lee CY (2003) Quantification of polyphenolics and their antioxidant capacity in fresh plums. J  Agric Food Chem 51: 6509-6515.
  16. Zhishen J, Mengcheng T, Jianming W(1999) The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food Chem 64: 555-559.
  17. Satoh E, Tohyama N, Nishimura M (2005) Comparison of the antioxidant activity of roasted tea with green, oolong, and black teas. Int J Food Sci Nutr 56: 551-559.
  18. Prieto P, Pineda M, Aguilar M(1999) Spectrophotometric quantitation of antioxidant capacity through the formation of a phosphomolybdenum complex: Specific application to the determination of vitamin E. Anal Biochem 269: 337-341.
  19. Aruoma O (1996b) Assessment of potential prooxidant and antioxidant actions. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society 73: 1617-1625.
  20. Pulido R Bravo L, Saura-Calixto F (2000) Antioxidant activity of dietary polyphenols as determined by a modified ferric reducing/antioxidant power assay. J Agric Food Chem 48: 3396-3402.
  21. Gao R, Yuan Z, Zhao Z, Gao X (1998) Mechanism of pyrogallol autoxidation and determination of superoxide dismutase enzyme activity. Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics 45: 41-45.
  22. Marklund S, Marklund G (1974) Involvement of the superoxide anion radical in the autoxidation of pyrogallol and a convenient assay for superoxide dismutase. Eur J Biochem 47: 469-474.
  23. Benzie IF, Strain JJ (1996) The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of "antioxidant power": the FRAP assay. Anal Biochem 239: 70-76.
  24. De Ancos B, Sgroppo S, Plaza L, Cano MP (2002) Possible nutritional and health-related value promotion in orange juice preserved by high-pressure treatment. J Sci Food Agric 82: 790-796.
  25. Bao J, Cai Y, Sun M, Wang G, Corke H (2005) Anthocyanins, flavonols, and free radical scavenging activity of Chinese bayberry (Myrica rubra) extracts and their color properties and stability. J Agric Food Chem 53: 2327-2332.
  26. Al-Farsi MA, Lee CY (2008b) Nutritional and functional properties of dates: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 48: 877-887.
  27. Al-Farsi M, Chang Yong Lee (2008a) Optimization of phenolics and dietary fiber extraction from date seeds. J Food Chem3: 977-985.
  28. Al-Farsi M, Alasalvar C, Al-Abid M, Al-Shoaily K, Al-Amry M, et al. (2007) Compositional and functional characteristics of dates, syrups, and their by-products. Food Chem 104: 943-947.
  29. Guendez R, Kallithraka S, Makris DP, Kefalas P (2005) An analytical survey of the polyphenols of seeds of varieties of grape (Vitis vinifera) cultivated in Greece: implications for exploitation as a source of value-added phytochemicals. Phytochem Anal 16: 17-23.
  30. Chaira N, Ferchichi A, Mrabet A, Sghairoun M (2007) Chemical composition of the flesh and the pit of date palm fruit and radical scavenging activity of their extracts. Pak J Biol Sci 10: 2202-2207.
  31. Limon-Pacheco J, Gonsebatt ME (2009) The role of antioxidants and antioxidant-related enzymes in protective responses to environmentally induced oxidative stress. Mutat Res 674: 137-147.
  32. Shen Y, Jin L, Xiao P, Lu Y, Bao J (2009) Total phenolics, flavonoids, antioxidant capacity in rice grain and their relations to grain color, size and weight. J Cereal Sci 49: 106-111.
  33. Schwartz E, Tzulker R, Glazer I, Bar-Ya'akov I, Wiesman Z, et al. (2009) Environmental conditions affect the color, taste, and antioxidant capacity of 11 pomegranate accessions' fruits. J Agric Food Chem 57: 9197-9209.
  34. Jomova K, Valko M (2011) Advances in metal-induced oxidative stress and human disease. Toxicology 283: 65-87.
Citation: Platat C, Habib HM, AL Maqbali FD, Jaber NN, Ibrahim WH (2014) Identification of Date Seeds Varieties Patterns to Optimize Nutritional Benefits of Date Seeds. J Nutr Food Sci S8:008.

Copyright: © 2014 Platat C, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top