Journal of Antivirals & Antiretrovirals

Journal of Antivirals & Antiretrovirals
Open Access

ISSN: 1948-5964

+44 1300 500008

Review Article - (2011) Volume 3, Issue 3

Immunity to Cytomegalovirus

A Lochmanova* and Ivo Lochman
Czech Republic, E-mail: ivo.lochnam@osu.cz
*Corresponding Author: A Lochmanova, Czech Republic Email:

Abstract

Cytomegalovirus is one of the most immunodominant antigens that are encountered by the human immune system. The human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) exhibits a broad cellular tropism and can infect most major organ systems and cell types. Immunologic control of HCMV replication includes several distinct categories of effector cells: natural killer cells, macrophages, B cells and T cells however virus-specific CD8+ and CD4+ T cells appear to play a pivotal role. The importance of cell mediated immunity against CMV is exemplified by the occurrence of severe and prolonged HCMV infection in immunocompromised individuals, including transplant recipients, late stage -HIV patients, congenitally infected neonates, elderly subjects and/or septic patients. Severely impaired T-cell function leads to viral reactivation and consequences are widely variable, ranging from asymptomatic infections to life-threatening situations. Monitoring of protective HCMV-specific immune response may serve as an early predictive marker for identifying individuals at high risk for HCMV disease prior to the detection of increased viremia. The identification of patients who are at high risk of CMV is a more complex challenge for the laboratory. Mainly HCMV specific T cell immunity, resp. enumeration of CD8+ HCMV specific T cells would be expected to correlate with the incidence of HCMV disease. Recently, it has become possible to enumerate antigen-specific CD8+ T cells by using tetramers. HCMVspecific cellular immunity by evaluating the activation capacity of CD8+ T cells to a mitogenic stimulus or whole HCMV antigen or HCMV peptides assessed by IFNγ ELISPOT or ELISA seem to be promising in the assessment of HCMV specific function/immunity. However the clinical utility of these assays will need to be evaluated.

<

Keywords: HCMV; Immune system; Cellular immunity; T cells; Cytokines

Introduction

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), a member of Herpesviridae family, is a ubiquitous opportunistic pathogen. Compared to other human herpes viruses, HCMV is the largest, with a genome of approximately 235 kb. HCMV genome contains a number of accessory genes; most of them are engaged in immune evasion or inhibition of cell death. HCMV infection usually peaks first during childhood. The next peak occurs in young adults, mostly by sexual transmission [1,2]. Primary HCMV infection in healthy hosts is usually a clinically silent even with few symptoms like fever, myalgia, cervical lymphadenopathy etc. After an initial primary infection, HCMV can remain latent throughout the lifetime of the host and sporadic reactivation events, if they occur, are generally well controlled by immunosurveillance. Viral latency is defined as the persistence of viral genome in the absence of production of infection virions [3,4].

Transplacental transmission during pregnancy or neonatal infection can lead to neurological damage, manifesting itself as deafness or learning disability in early life [4,5].

Infection with HCMV occurs as result of exposure of mucosal surfaces of the upper respiratory tract or the genital tract. Although the cellular target of HCMV infection remains incompletely defined, the widespread expression of putative cell surface receptors including proteoglykans, integrins and epidermal grow factor receptor suggest that the tropism of virus is not limited to specific cell types on the mucosal surfaces. After mucosal infection with HCMV, local and initial viremia leads to infection of visceral structures such as the liver and spleen. Infection of these organs is then followed by a secondary viremia that leads to more generalized infection [6].

HCMV exhibits a broad cellular tropism and can infect a remarkably broad cell range within its host. Epithelial cells, endothelial cells, fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells are the predominant targets for virus replication [7,8]. Infectivity in the blood compartment is most frequently associated with peripheral blood leukocytes and endothelial cell. Endothelial cells also appear to be crucial for infection of various tissues during HCMV dissemination. Even though the polymorphonuclear leucocytes cannot support virus replication, they have been shown to carry virus and viral gene products. Other cells of peripheral blood cells that enable HCMV resistance and transmit infectious virus include monocytes, resp. macrophages [9,10,11]. Moreover, it appeared that HCMV infection of host cells, including monocytes and endothelial cells, could induce expression of variety mediators of the inflammatory response including adhesion molecules, chemokines, cytokines, and pro-inflammatory enzymes such as COX-2 [6].

The outcome of HCMV infection typically correlates with the immune status of the host. HCMV infection is well controlled in immunocompetent hosts and infection of healthy individuals is often asymptomatic. In contrast, infection of immunocompromised hosts, especially organ and stem cell transplantant recipients and AIDS patients can be devastating.

Immune response to HCMV infection

HCMV, like other herper viruses, broadly influences the magnitude and quality of both innate and adaptive immune response. Cells infected with HCMV exhibit profound reprogramming of gene expression. Antiviral genes belonging to the interferon-stimulated gene family and inflammatory genes such as those for TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12, IL-18 and cyclooxygenase 2 (COXX-2) are hallmarks of innate immunity that contribute significantly to control infection [1,12,13].

Infection with HCMV is followed both humoral and cellular immune responses. Antibody-mediated complement lysis is an important mechanism for elimination of virus-infected cells. HCMV have evolved mechanisms limiting complement activity and it is able to inactivate the complement cascade, increasing virus replication and survival [14,15].

Humoral immunity is established early and immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody remains the standard assay for determining infection history but the protection value of this response is unclear [16].

It is widely believed that the cellular immune response is the major mechanism by which HCMV replication is controlled. The presence of protective anti-HCMV cellular immunity is hypothesized to prevent HCMV disease regardless of the anti-CMV status [17]. The crucial role of cell-mediated immunity against HCMV demonstrates the fact that severe and prolonged HCMV infections occur in individuals with congenital, iatrogenic, or acquired immune deficiences. Infection in most individuals with primary B cell disorders usually is not severe [18].

Immune control of HCMV replication includes several distinct categories of cells: natural killer (NK) cells, macrophages, B cells, αβ and γδ T cells but particularly T cells seem to play a key role in this process. Mostly T lymphocytes are of major importance in the initiation and maintenance immunity against viral infection. Both virus-specific CD8+ and CD4+ T cells seem important in the control of active as well as persistent infection. The main function of cytotoxic CD 8 T cells resides in the specific lysis of virus-infected target cells, CD4 T cells are critical for the induction and regulation of immune responsiveness. This function is mediated by the specific activation of dendritic cells, which present antigenic peptides in the context of MHC class I molecules to induce virus-specific cytotoxic CD8 cells. Furthermore, CD4 T cells provide help for B cells to secrete virus specific antibodies. Both CD4 and CD8 T cells secrete cytokines, such as interferon-γ (IFN-γ) or tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), that may have direct antiviral effects [19,20,21].

Secretion of cytokines and chemokines has both local and systemic effect, whereas lysis of infected cells by components of CD8+ T cell cytotoxic granules depends on cell-cell contact. Upon resolution of the viral expansion, most of these effector T cells die by apoptosis, whereas other enters the memory pool [13,16,19].

On the other hand, immune evasion strategies contribute to successful persistence of virus in the immunocompetent host. In the infected cell, herpes viruses use general evasion approaches, such blocking the induction synthesis and dedicate part of their genomes to functions that modulate immune recognition. But most specific evasion strategies describe to date allow viruses to impair T cell activation by interfering with both major histokompatibility complex (MHC) class I and MHC class II antigen processing a presentation [22].

Age-dependent HCMV immunity

Congenital infection may be severe and followed by permanent sequelae CMV infection. Preconceptional immunity against HCMV provides only partial protection from intrauterine transmission of the virus and the factors that are associated with this transmission of HCMV have not been identified. Unlike adult primary HCMV infection of neonates and infants usually results in continuous or frequent shedding into urine and saliva for up to several years. The difference in duration of HCMV shedding in young children and adults is related to quantitative and qualitative differences in the T cell mediated immune response, resp. CD4+ T cell mediated immunity that in generated in an age-dependent manner [23,24].

Inflammatory mechanisms play a prominent role in the pathogenesis of many age-related diseases and possibly in the primary process of aging itself. It has become evident, that HCMV chronic infection contributes to a number of modifications that characterize immunosenescence. HCMV infection accelerates in the reduction in the naïve T cell pool, which occurs following thymic involution. However, it has been reported that elderly subject exhibit an increase in T cell specific for HCM-derived epitopes, constituting oligoclonal T cell expansion, with phenotype of highly differentiated effector cells. HCMV-specific CD8+ T cells produce IFN-γ but no IL-4 and very little IL-12. A high type 1 combined with a low type 2 cytokine production can change the cytokine microenvironment in lymphatic tissues and trigger ubiquitous inflammatory process in elderly persons The low number of CD8+ naïve T cells may lead to difficulties in the immunological response to neoantigens in old age [25,26,27].

HCMV infection in immunocompromised individuals

HCMV infection in immunocompromised individuals causes various clinical syndromes in different groups of patients, and the severity of infection is proportional to the degree of immunosuppression. The most severe infections develop in transplant recipients, late stage HIV-patients, and congenitally infected neonates. However, patients with T lymphocyte defects and old people are prone to reactivation and life-threatening infections. Recently, laboratory-based signs of active CMV infection have been observed in association with the onset and course of autoimmune diseases [28,29,30].

HCMV infection and primary immunodeficiences

The primary manifestation of the immunodeficiences is undue susceptibility to infection. It means too many, too severe, prolonged, complicated and unusual infections. HCMV infections of immunocompetent hosts are characterized by a dynamic, life-long interaction in which host immune response, particularly of T cells, restrain viral replication and prevent disease but do not eliminate the virus or preclude transmission. HCMV infection may be severe in the immunocompromised host, particularly in the face of T cell deficiency such as due to primary immunogenetic defects or acquired immunoficiency states. HCMV is poorly adapted to survive within an immunosuppressed host, and, in this situation, there is often uncontrolled viral replication with subsequent viral reactivation [31,32,33].

Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) is the most common primary antibody deficiency caused by a variety of inherited genetic defects. The disease in many patients is probably determined by multiple abnormalities in different cell types. Many of CVID patients have a T cell lymphopenia, which is often, associated with poor T cell proliferation to mitogens in vitro what appears to be a significant defect in cellular immunity. The same patients often show signs of persistent immunostimulation and inflammation raising the possibility that these abnormalities reflect persistent viral infection in a substantial subset of CVID patients [34].

HCMV in immunosuppressed patients

HCMV infection is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in immunosuppressed patients, including organ and bone marrow transplant recipients, hemodialysis patients, cancer patients, patients receiving immunosuppressive drugs and HIV-infected patients [27,35]. The majority of CMV disease is caused by reactivation of a latent infection rather that by newly acquired virus. A series of mechanisms have been proposed to be responsible for CMV reactivation. These include: (a) stress, (b) inflammation, and (c) some cAMP-elevating drugs (e.g. pentoxifylline). The loss of immune control of HCMV is closely associated with an impaired function of CMV-specific CD8+ T cells. In fact, it is the reduced cytokine production rather than a lower frequency or absolute number of HCMV-specific CD4+ or CD8+ T cells that are thought to be responsible for the loss of immune control. Reduced numbers of cytokine-producing HCMV-specific CD8+ T cells were found in individuals with higher risk of HCMV reactivation [36,37,38].

AIDS patients develop cytomegalovirus disease in advanced stages of immunosuppression, at CD4 cell counts of less than 50 cells/μl when there are other defects in antigen-driven lymphocyte proliferation, natural killer activity and production of cytokines. Loss of HCMV specific CD4+ T lymphocyte function may be key to pathogenesis of AIDS-related cytomegalovirus disease, increased HCMV-specific CD4+ lymphocytes response have been observed after initiation of highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART). However, CD4 T cell count is only one the other factors related to HCMV virulence. In addition, the amount of circulation cytomegalovirus DNA is predictive of cytomegalovirus end-organ disease [39,40].

HCMV is a common pathogen that influences the outcome after transplantation. HCMV infection is associated with an increased predisposition to acute and chronic allograft rejection accelerates the occurrence of number of other opportunistic infection, as well as reduced overall patient and allograft survival. A consistence feature of HCMV infection in allograft recipients is the temporal sequence associated with virus replication and disease. In solid organ allograft recipient’s virus replication and clinical symptoms are commonly observed several weeks following transplantation. The seemingly prolonged interval between transplantation and expression of acute disease syndrome remains unexplained but probably HCMV must first establish a productive infection and amplify its genome copy number prior to dissemination to distant sites. CMV disease occurs only if the T cell response in compromised, so the most common predisposing factor for the occurrence of HCMV disease after transplantation is the lack of an effective HCMV-specific immunity [41,42]. Current immunosuppressive therapies used to prevent the rejection of a transplanted organ have detrimental effects upon T lymphocytes and cell-mediated immune responses, resulting in increased susceptibility to CMV infection. Moreover, the majority of donors and recipients have latent CMV infection at the time of transplantation. Infection can occur as result of reactivation of latent virus or new infection from donor tissues. That is why donor CMV positivity, especially in the absence of prior recipient infection, is the most important risk factor for post transplant infection. It is clear that pre-existing immunity modifies the course of infection [48].

In addition to the role of HCMV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, there are data to suggest that functionality of the innate immune system contributes to HCMV disease pathogenesis. It was shown, that recipients with specific polymorphism in innate immune molecules known as Toll-like receptors were more likely to develop higher levels of HCMV replication and clinical disease [46].

Although active HCMV is well-known opportunistic infection in immunocompromised patients HCMV can be reactivated in patients with sepsis and septic shock not undergoing immunosuppressive therapy. It was demonstrated that active HCMV infection develops despite functionally active HCMV-reactive Th-1 cells. The hyperreactive inflammatory phase matched by increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines (e.g. TNF-α, IL-6), arachidonic acid derivates (e.g. prostaglandine and thromboxane), and chemokines, contributes to HCMV reactivation [43,44].

Importance of laboratory diagnosis of HCMV infection in immunocompromised patients

Reactivation of HCMV remains a serious problem in immunosuppressed individuals. An important proportion of immunodepressed patients are latent carriers of the virus and the lack of cellular immunity predispose these patients to an active infection in which the virus is replicating. Consequences for the immunodepressed patients are widely variable, ranging from completely asymptomatic infections to life-threatening situations. Therefore the identification of patients who are at high risk of HCMV disease is a more complex challenge for the laboratory.

Until now, serological test have been proven the most useful. The HCMV IgG results indicate past HCMV infection, while the finding of IgM may reflect a recent infection or reactivation [45,46]. Nevertheless, there is a continuous effort to develop more HCMV-specific immune based methods, which may be of benefit in the control of HCMV disease. Because of their speed, sensitivity, and specificity, molecular diagnosis assay, resp quantitative RT-PCR testing, are increasingly used as a marker for HCMV reactivation [47]. However, the current data indicate that sometimes even active HCMV disease does not always correlate with viral load detection and a negative PCR result does not exclude HCMV end-organ disease [48].

T cells are crucial for the control of HCMV in infected individuals. Several methods are available to measure the number, diversity, differentiation and function of HCMV-specific T cells. These are predominantly flow cytometry techniques such as measurement of major histokompatibility complex class I- peptide tetramer binding, intracellular cytokine and chemokine release, cytotoxic potential and T-cell proliferation. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay spot (ELISPOT) can also be used to measure cytokine production at the single level [48,49].

It has been shown that cytomegalovirus IFN-γ production correlates with protection against HCMV reactivation. Several cells of the immune system synthesize and secrete IFN-γ upon stimulation, including CD4, CD8n and natural killer cells. Although the association between IFN-γ and protection against cytomegalovirus reactivation does not identify the cell type that mediates the protective effect, it characterizes the protective response as T helper cell, resp. Th type 1. Assays that detect the production of IFN-γ following stimulation with whole CMV antigens or CMV peptides have previously been used to identify the presence of HCMV-specific function/immunity and has been correlated with protection against HCMV reactivation disease in HIV-infected and transplanted individuals. One of the new, high throughput quantitative assays to detect HCMV-specific CD8+ T cell immunity is QuantiFERON®-CMV assay (Cellestis) which measures IFN-γ production in response to a range of previously defined CD8+ T cell CMV epitopes [40,50,51].

Great attention is recently been given to T regulatory cells (Treg). It has been shown that week regulatory T cell response might maintain high-generalized immune activation, potentially contributing to CD4+ decline even in the absence of clinically detectable viremia [52].

The immunological aspects of HCMV infection is very complex and displays a broad heterogeneity. Current management of HCMV reactivation and HCMV disease HCMV elicits both humoral and cellular immune responses, although the latter appear more critical for viral control. Knowledge of the characteristics of HCMV-specific CD8+ T cells as well as functional cell activity characterized by cytokine production might also be considered in diagnosis, monitoring and therapy of HCMV disease.

References

  1. Juckem LK, Boehme KW, Feire AL, Compton T (2008) Differential initiation of innate immune responses induced by human cytomegalovirus entry into fibroblast cells.J Immunol180: 4965-4977.
  2. Moss P, Khan N (2004 ) CD8(+) T-cell immunity to cytomegalovirus. Hum Immunol 65: 456-464.
  3. Sinclair J, Sissons P (2006) Latency and reactivation of human cytomegalovirus. J Gen Virol 87:1763-1779
  4. Lim JB, Kwon OH, Kim HS, Kim HO,Choi JR, et al.(2004) Adoptive immunotherapy for cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in immunocompromised patients.Yonsei Med J Suppl 45:18-22.
  5. Britt W Virus entry into host, establishment of infection, spread in host, mechanisms of tissue damage. In: Arvin A, Campadelli-Fiume G, Mocarski E, Moore PS, Roizman B, Whitley R, Yamanishi K, editors. Human Herpes viruses: Biology, Therapy and Immunoprophylaxis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2007. Chapter 41.
  6. Isaacson MK, Juckem LK, Compton T(2008) Virus entry and innate immune activation.Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 325:85-100.
  7. Sinzger C, Digel M, Jahn G (2008) Cytomegalovirus cell tropism. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 325: 63-83.
  8. Gerna G, Percivalle E, Baldanti F, Sozzani S, Lanzarini P, et al.(2000) Human cytomegalovirus replicates abortively in polymorphonuclear leukocytes after transfer from infected endothelial cells via transient microfusion events. J Virol 74:5629-5638.
  9. Waldman WJ, Knight DA, Huang EH, Sedmak DD (1995). Bidirectional transmission of infectious cytomegalovirus between monocytes and vascular endothelial cells: an in vitro model. J Infect Dis 171: 263-272.
  10. Sinzger C, Jahn G (1996) Human cytomegalovirus cell tropism and pathogenesis. Intervirology 39: 302-319.
  11. Wilkinson GW, Tomasec P, Stanton RJ, Armstrong M, Prod'homme V, et al.(2008) Modulation of natural killer cells by human cytomegalovirus. J Clin Virol 41: 206-212.
  12. Miller-Kittrell M, Sparer TE (2009) Feeling manipulated: cytomegalovirus immune manipulation. Virol J 6: 4.
  13. Spiller OB, Hanna SM, Devine DV, Tufaro F (1997) Neutralization of cytomegalovirus virions: the role of complement. J Infect Dis176:339-347.
  14. Spear GT, Lurain NS, Parker CJ, Ghassemi M, Payne GH, et al. (1995) Host cell-derived complement control proteins CD55 and CD59 are incorporated into the virions of two unrelated enveloped viruses. Human T cell leukemia/ lymphoma virus type I (HTLV-I) and human cytomegalovirus (HCMV). J Immunol 155: 4376-4381.
  15. Motta VN, Martins SL (2008) Impairment of cytomegalovirus-specific cellular immune response as a risk factor for cytomegalovirus disease in transplant recipients. Braz J Med Biol Res41: 5-11
  16. Danziger-Isakov L, Heeger PS (2009) Clinical utility of measuring T-cell immunity to CMV in transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 9: 987-988.
  17. Rook AH(1988) Interactions of cytomegalovirus with the human immune system. Rev Infect Dis Suppl 3: S460-467.
  18. Sester M, Sester U, Gärtner BC, Girndt M, Meyerhans A, et al.(2002) Dominance of virus-specific CD8 T cells in human primary cytomegalovirus infection. J Am Soc Nephrol 13: 2577-2584.
  19. Waldrop SL, Davis KA, Maino VC, Picker LJ (1998) Normal human CD4+ memory T cells display broad heterogeneity in their activation threshold for cytokine synthesis. J Immunol 161: 5284-5295.
  20. Sandberg JK, Fast NM, Nixon DF (2001) Functional heterogeneity of cytokines and cytolytic effector molecules in human CD8+ T lymphocytes. J Immunol 167:181-187.
  21. Wiertz EJ, Devlin R, Collins HL, Ressing ME (2007) Herpesvirus interference with major histocompatibility complex class II-restricted T-cell activation. J Virol 81: 4389-4396.
  22. Tu W, Chen S, Sharp M, Dekker C, Manganello AM, et al. (2004) Persistent and selective deficiency of CD4+ T cell immunity to cytomegalovirus in immunocompetent young children. J Immunol 172: 3260-3267.
  23. Boppana SB, Rivera LB, Fowler KB, Mach M, Britt WJ (2001) Intrauterine transmission of cytomegalovirus to infants of women with preconceptional immunity. N Engl J Med 344: 1366-1371.
  24. Vescovini R, Biasini C, Fagnoni FF, Telera AR, Zanlari L, et al. (2007) Massive load of functional effector CD4+ and CD8+ T cells against cytomegalovirus in very old subjects. J Immunol 179: 4283-4291.
  25. Almanzar G, Schwaiger S, Jenewein B, Keller M, Herndler-Brandstetter D, et al. (2005) Long-term cytomegalovirus infection leads to significant changes in the composition of the CD8+ T-cell repertoire, which may be the basis for an imbalance in the cytokine production profile in elderly persons. J Virol 79: 3675- 3683.
  26. Weinberger B, Lazuardi L, Weiskirchner I, Keller M, Neuner C, et al. (2007) Healthy aging and latent infection with CMV lead to distinct changes in CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell subsets in the elderly. Hum Immunol 68: 86-90.
  27. Rafailidis PI, Mourtzoukou EG, Varbobitis IC, Falagas ME (2008) Severe cytomegalovirus infection in apparently immunocompetent patients: a systematic review. Virol J 5: 47.
  28. Varani S, Landini MP (2011) Cytomegalovirus-induced immunopathology and its clinical consequences. Herpesviridae 2: 6.
  29. Gamadia LE, Rentenaar RJ, Baars PA, Remmerswaal EB, Surachno S, et al. (2001) Differentiation of cytomegalovirus-specific CD8(+) T cells in healthy and immunosuppressed virus carriers. Blood 98: 754-761.
  30. Kano Y, Shiohara T (2000) Current understanding of cytomegalovirus infection in immunocompetent individuals. J Dermatol Sci 22: 196-204.
  31. Stiehm ER, Chin TW, Haas A, Peerless AG (1986) Infectious complications of the primary immunodeficiencies. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 40: 69-86.
  32. Sylwester AW, Mitchell BL, Edgar JB, Taormina C, Pelte C, et al. (2005) Broadly targeted human cytomegalovirus-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells dominate the memory compartments of exposed subjects. J Exp Med 202: 673-685.
  33. Raeiszadeh M, Kopycinski J, Paston SJ, Diss T, Lowdell M, et al. (2006) The T cell response to persistent herpes virus infections in common variable immunodeficiency. Clin Exp Immunol 146: 234-242.
  34. Harari A, Zimmerli SC, Pantaleo G (2004) Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific cellular immune responses. Hum Immunol 65: 500-506.
  35. Pescovitz MD (2007) Review of the CMV in renal transplantation. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 18: 505-511.
  36. Stone SF, Price P, French MA (2006) Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific CD8+ T cells in individuals with HIV infection: correlation with protection from CMV disease. J Antimicrob Chemother 57: 585-588.
  37. Hughes D, Hafferty J, Fulton L, Friend P, Devaney A, et al. (2008) Donor and recipient CMV serostatus and antigenemia after renal transplantation: an analysis of 486 patients. J Clin Virol 41: 92-95.
  38. Singh KP, Howard JL, Wild SP, Jones SL, Hoy J, et al. (2007) Human cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific CD8+ T cell responses are reduced in HIVinfected individuals with a history of CMV disease despite CD4+ T cell recovery. Clin Immunol 124: 200-206.
  39. Weinberg A, Wohl DA, MaWhinney S, Barrett RJ, Brown DG, et al. (2003) Cytomegalovirus-specific IFN-gamma production is associated with protection against cytomegalovirus reactivation in HIV-infected patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy. AIDS 17: 2445-2450.
  40. Jacobson MA, Schrier R, McCune JM, Torriani FJ, Holland GN, et al. (2001) Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific CD4+ T lymphocyte immune function in longterm survivors of AIDS-related CMV end-organ disease who are receiving potent antiretroviral therapy. J Infect Dis183 :1399-1404.
  41. Bunde T, Kirchner A, Hoffmeister B, Habedank D, Hetzer R, et al. (2005) Protection from cytomegalovirus after transplantation is correlated with immediate early 1-specific CD8 T cells. J Exp Med 201: 1031-1036.
  42. Razonable RR (2008) Cytomegalovirus infection after liver transplantation: current concepts and challenges. World J Gastroenterol 14: 4849-4860.
  43. von Muller L, Klemm A, Durmus N, Weiss M, Suger-Wiedeck H, et al. (2007) Cellular immunity and active human cytomegalovirus infection in patients with septic shock. J Infect Dis 196: 1288-1295.
  44. Hughes D, Hafferty J, Fulton L, Friend P, Devaney A, et al. (2008) Donor and recipient CMV serostatus and antigenemia after renal transplantation: an analysis of 486 patients. J Clin Virol 41: 92-95.
  45. Enan KM, Rennert H, El-Eragi AM, El Hussein AR, Elkhidir IM (2011) Comparison of Real-time PCR to ELISA for the detection of Human Cytomegalovirus infection in Renal Transplant Patients in the Sudan. Virol J 8: 222.
  46. Ruell J, Barnes C, Mutton K, Foulkes B, Chang J, et al. (2007) Active CMV disease does not always correlate with viral load detection. Bone Marrow Transplant 40: 55-61.
  47. Motta VN, Martins SL (2008) Impairment of cytomegalovirus-specific cellular immune response as a risk factor for cytomegalovirus disease in transplant recipients. Braz J Med Biol Res 41: 5-11.
  48. Wills MR, Okecha G, Weekes MP, Gandhi MK, Sissons PJ, et al. (2002) Identification of naive or antigen-experienced human CD8(+) T cells by expression of costimulation and chemokine receptors: analysis of the human cytomegalovirus-specific CD8(+) T cell response. J Immunol 168: 5455-64.
  49. Singh KP, Howard JL, Wild SP, Jones SL, Hoy J, et al. (2007)Human cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific CD8+ T cell responses are reduced in HIVinfected individuals with a history of CMV disease despite CD4+ T cell recovery. Clin Immunol 124: 200-206.
  50. Lochmanova A, Lochman I, Tomaskova H, Marsalkova P, Raszka J,et al. (2010) Quantiferon-CMV test in prediction of cytomegalovirus infection after kidney transplantation.Transplant Proc 42: 3574-3577.
  51. Hunt PW, Landay AL, Sinclair E, Martinson JA, Hatano H, et al. (2011) A low T regulatory cell response may contribute to both viral control and generalized immune activation in HIV controllers. PLoS One 6: e15924.
Citation: Lochmanova A, Lochman I (2011) Immunity to Cytomegalovirus. J Antivir Antiretrovir 3: 040-044.

Copyright: © 2011 Lochmanova A, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top