Journal of Horticulture

Journal of Horticulture
Open Access

ISSN: 2376-0354

+44-77-2385-9429

Research Article - (2015) Volume 2, Issue 1

In vitro Propagation of Kainth (Pyrus pashia) Using Explants from Forced Cutting

Rehman HU*
Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India
*Corresponding Author: Rehman HU, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India, Tel: +08054641392 Email:

Abstract

This study was carried out in Tissue culture laboratory, Department of Fruit Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana during 2011-13. The effect of various media {1/2 MS (M1), MS (M2) and WPM (M3)} and growth regulators (BAP, IBA and NAA) on establishment, proliferation and rooting was studied. Maximum establishment (63.60%) was obtained on M2 containing BAP (1.5 mgl-1) and IBA (0.25 mgl-1). Maximum proliferated cultures (95.30%) and shoots per explant were obtained using M3 medium fortified with BAP (3.0 mgl-1). However, shoots of maximum length (42.97 mm) were obtained in M3 medium containing BAP (0.0 mgl-1) i.e control. Rooting (%), roots per explant and root length was found to be influenced by type of medium and growth regulator fortification. Rooting (%) was maximum (13.34%) was observed in M1 medium supplemented with IBA (0.1 mgl-1). However, NAA (1.0 mgl-1) induced rooting of 29.61 per cent using M1 medium. Maximum roots per explant were obtained using M1 medium supplemented with IBA (1.0 mgl-1). NAA (1.0 mgl-1) induced highest roots per explant i.e 3.40 using M1 medium. However, M3 supplemented with IBA (0.1 mgl-1) resulted in maximum root length of 31.15 mm. NAA (0.1 mgl-1) resulted in maximum root length of 22.97 mm using M1 medium.

<

Keywords: Media; Establishment; Proliferation; Rooting; Fortification

Introduction

The use of tissue culture for fruit and nut tree species have increased substantially since the early 1970s and virtually all fruit tree species have been micropropagated with various degrees of success. Seedling rootstocks are not uniform in growth and productivity [1]. Therefore, vegetative propagation methods like cutting and stooling are used to multiply pear rootstocks. Micropropagation has shown promises for rapid and large scale clonal multiplication of disease free planting material throughout the year. In vitro propagation has been reported in several pear rootstocks viz. P betulaefolia L. [2], Wild pear [3]; OPR 157, OPR 260 and OH × F 230 [4]; P calleryana [5] and quince [6], Pyrodwarf [7] and Pyrus communis L. rootstock [8].

Materials and Methods

For forcing, dormant cuttings of Kainth of 15-20 cm in length (10-15 mm diameter) were collected and stored at 4±3°C in polythene bags. After subjecting the requisite chilling units, the cuttings were withdrawn and basal ends were re-cut by about 1 cm and placed in polythene bags containing rooting medium, covering about 5 cm of basal portion of cuttings. The cuttings were incubated in growth chamber at 23±1°C under 16 hours photoperiod with light intensity of 3000 lux. Shoots put forth by the sprouted buds served as explant source for in vitro propagation (Figure 1).

horticulture-Forced-cuttings

Figure 1: Forced cuttings of Kainth.

The basal media used in the study were Murashige and Skoog’s medium (MS), Murashige and Skoog’s medium with half strength of macro and micronutrients (1/2 MS) and Woody Plant Medium (WPM).

Already prepared MS medium (PT021) and WPM (PT026) purchased from Hi Media Pvt. Limited was used to prepare basal media i.e. M1 (half strength MS), M2 (full strength MS) and M3 (Woody Plant Medium). Sterilized explants were inoculated in test tubes/glass jars containing autoclaved media for establishment. Different media (½ MS, MS and WPM) fortified with different combinations of 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) {(0.5-3.0 mgl-1) and IBA (0.01-2.0 mgl-1)} were used. The data were recorded on necrotic cultures (%), explant establishment (%) after 3 weeks of inoculation.

Established explants were transferred to shoot proliferation media. Various shoot proliferation media i.e. ½ MS, MS and WPM were used, fortified with various concentrations of BAP i.e. 0.5-5.0 mgl-1. The optimum media and concentration of BAP for shoot proliferation was standardized. Observations on proliferated cultures (%), number of shoots/explant and average length of shoot (mm) was recorded after third subculture and the culture duration were four weeks each.

After allowing shoots to multiply on shoot proliferation medium, individual shoots were separated (20 mm long) and transferred to root regeneration medium. Different types of media i.e. ½ MS, MS and WPM containing various combinations of IBA (0.1-2.0 mgl-1) and NAA (0.1-2.0 mgl-1) were used. Observations on rooting (%), number of roots/ explant and average length of roots (mm) were recorded after four weeks.

Results and Discussion

The results of present investigation are described under appropriate heads supplemented with tables and plates.

Effect of medium supplemented with growth regulators on explant establishment

Data in Table 1 reveal that both media and growth regulator had significant effect on establishment (%). Highest establishment of 23.55 per cent was achieved by using M3 medium, which was significantly higher as compared to M2 and M1. The data clearly shows that establishment percentage was highest using BAP (1.5 mgl-1) and IBA (0.25 mgl-1) and this combination differed significantly from all other combinations. Interaction studies between medium and growth regulators revealed that the highest explant establishment of 52.80 per cent was achieved from M2 medium fortified with BAP (1.5 mgl-1) and IBA (0.25 mgl-1) (Figure 2).

Growth regulator
combination (mgl-1)
Media Mean
M1(1/2 MS) M2(MS) M3(WPM)
BAP(0.5)+IBA(0.01) 21.32 25.05 16.61 20.99
BAP(0.5)+IBA(0.25) 0.40 9.11 25.04 11.52
BAP(0.5)+IBA(0.5) 0.05 0.21 12.47 4.24
BAP(1.0)+IBA(0.01) 11.12 26.68 50.14 29.31
BAP(1.0)+IBA(0.25) 8.36 14.19 41.49 21.35
BAP(1.0)+IBA(0.5) 5.29 11.29 11.72 9.43
BAP(1.5)+IBA(0.01) 18.82 26.36 31.27 25.48
BAP(1.5)+IBA(0.25) 11.06 52.80 27.30 30.39
BAP(1.5)+IBA(0.5) 5.09 18.71 14.30 12.70
Control 5.67 10.40 5.12 7.063
Mean 8.72 19.48 23.55  
C.D(p ≤ 0.05) Media (A)=0.881, GR’s (B)= 1.608, A×B=2.786

Table 1: Effect of media type and growth regulators (mg/l) on explant establishment (%).

horticulture-MS-medium

Figure 2: Explant establishment in MS medium fortified with BAP (1.5 mgl-1) + IBA(0.25 mgl-1)

M1 medium fortified with BAP (0.5 mgl-1) and IBA (0.5 mgl-1) resulted in the lowest establishment (%). These results are in conformity with earlier observation made by De Paoli, [9], who reported Murashige and Skoog medium as the best medium for culture initiation resulting in the highest establishment (%) with least necrotic cultures. Variations in per cent establishment of explants with different doses of auxin and cytokinin during micropropagation are in conformity with the reports given by Fan and Jiang [10] in apple; [11] in Carica papaya; [12] in pear; [13] in Citrus acida; [14] in pineapple and [15] in sweet cherry. Different media have been tried earlier for establishment of plant species by various workers and reported varied results in terms of establishment percentage. Peer et al. [16] reported better results in terms of establishment percentage in sweet cherry cv. Bigarreau Noir Grossa using Murashige and Skoog medium over Driver and Kuniyuli medium, Woody Plant Medium and Knop’s macro and MS micro-organics medium independent of growth regulators concentration. In vitro effects of growth regulator on overall establishment of explant has been reported to be influenced by growth medium composition, growing conditions and genotype [17,18].

Shoot proliferation

Established explants were transferred to shoot proliferation media i.e. M1, M2 and M3 containing different levels BAP. Data regarding shoot proliferation was obtained after two sub culturing as shoot growth was very slow initially irrespective of media used and growth regulator level.

From the perusal of (Table 2) it is evident that proliferated culture (%) during proliferation stage is certainly affected by type of media and BAP concentration individually as well as in interactive fashion. With regard to media, irrespective of BAP concentration, maximum proliferated culture (72.13%) was obtained in M3, which is significantly higher than proliferated culture (%) obtained in M2 and M1. Maximum proliferated cultures (91.13%) resulted by using BAP at 3.0 mgl-1, which is statistically at par with proliferated culture (%) obtained at BAP (1.5 mgl-1). Regarding interaction between type of media and BAP concentration, maximum proliferated cultures (95.30%) were obtained by using M3 fortified with BAP (3.0 mgl-1) (Figure 3).

Growth regulator (mgl-1) Media Mean
M1(1/2 MS) M2(MS) M3(WPM)
BAP(0.5) 60.03 71.43 66.65 66.04
BAP(1.5) 84.59 92.51 92.35 89.82
BAP(3.0) 86.44 91.64 95.30 91.13
Control 13.93 25.49 34.23 24.55
Mean 61.25 70.27 72.13  
C.D(p ≤ 0.05) Media (A)= 1.551 , BAP (B)= 1.790 , A×B=3.101

Table 2: Effect of media type and growth regulator level (mgl-1) on proliferated cultures (%).

horticulture-proliferation

Figure 3: Shoot proliferation in WPM fortified with BAP (3.0 mgl-1).

Data in (Table 3) clearly shows that with increase in level of BAP, there is increase in number of shoots produced per explant irrespective of media used. Maximum number of shoots per explant was observed in M3 (4.39) which was followed by M2 (3.61) and M1 (2.63). All media differ significantly in terms of production of number of shoots per explant. The highest number of shoots per explant i.e. 4.78 was obtained with BAP (3.0 mgl-1) and it was followed by 1.5 mgl-1 BAP (4.43). Interaction effect revealed that there is significant interaction between media and growth regulator concentration on number of shoots produced per explant in Kainth. M3 medium fortified with BAP (3.0 mgl-1) resulted in maximum number of shoots per explant (6.28) followed by 5.75 in M3 supplemented with BAP (1.5 mgl-1).

Growth regulator (mgl-1) Media Mean
M1(1/2 MS) M2(MS) M3(WPM)
BAP(0.5) 2.76 2.59 2.91 2.75
BAP(1.5) 2.92 4.61 5.75 4.43
BAP(3.0) 3.15 4.92 6.28 4.78
Control 1.68 2.33 2.62 2.21
Mean 2.63 3.61 4.39  
C.D(p ≤ 0.05) Media (A)= 0.141 , BAP (B)= 0.163 , A×B=0.282

Table 3: Effect of media type and growth regulator level (mgl-1) on number of shoots.

Shoots of most desirable length (40.86 mm) were obtained on M3 medium followed by 38.86 mm on M1 medium (Table 4). From the perusal of Table 5, shoot length clearly decreases with increase in level of BAP and shoots of maximum length were obtained when no growth regulator was added to medium i.e. control. Average shoot length produced at 0.5 mgl-1 BAP (41.79 mm) and control (42.19) were statistically at par but differ significantly from average shoot length produced at 1.5 mgl-1 BAP (37.20 mm) and 3.0 mgl-1 BAP (33.22 mm). There was no significant interaction between type of media and growth regulator level on average length of shoots although maximum length of shoots was obtained when basal M3 medium i.e. control was used during shoot proliferation.

Growth regulator (mgl-1) Media Mean
M1(1/2 MS) M2(MS) M3(WPM)
BAP(0.5) 42.10 40.31 42.97 41.79
BAP(1.5) 39.05 33.53 39.01 37.20
BAP(3.0) 31.02 31.37 37.26 33.22
Control 43.27 39.11 44.20 42.19
Mean 38.86 36.08 40.86  
C.D(p ≤ 0.05) Media (A)= 1.924 , BAP (B)= 2.222 , A×B=NS

Table 4: Effect of media type and growth regulator level (mgl-1) on av. length of shoots (mm).

These findings are in conformity with those of in P. pyrifolia cv. in Japanese pear cultivar Hosui, who reported superiority of WPM over other media with respect to proliferation rate [19,20]. BAP level was found to effect significantly per cent proliferation, shoots per explant and shoot length and these results are in conformity with studies reported by Dwivedi and Bist [19]; Sedlak and Paprstein [21]; Cosac and Frasin [22]; Karimpour et al. [18]; Hassanen and Gabr [2]; Ruzic et al. [7]; Isikalan et al. [23] and Soni et al. [24]. Hu and Wang [25] reported that cytokinins, especially BAP stimulated axillary bud development but at higher concentration shoot elongation was suppressed. Similarly, higher number of shoots per explant during proliferation stage on M2 as compared to M1 has been reported by Hassan [26] in Le Conte pear, [27] in Bartlett pear and [28] on figure due to higher nutrient concentration.

In vitro rooting

The in vitro regenerated shoots during shoot proliferation were transferred to various rooting media supplemented with different levels of IBA and NAA. Data from (Table 5) reveal that the highest rooting of 5.22 per cent was observed on M1 medium, which is significantly different from rooting percentage observed on M2 and M3. Irrespective of media, IBA (0.1 mgl-1) induced higher rooting (1.58%) as compared to IBA (1.0 mgl-1). The interaction effect of treatment combination of M1 fortified with IBA (0.1 mgl-1) resulted in best rooting response (13.34%) (Figure 4), when compared to M3 fortified with IBA (0.1 mgl-1).

Growth
regulator (mgl-1)
Media Mean
M1(1/2 MS) M2(MS) M3(WPM)
IBA (0.1) 13.34 9.04 9.36 10.58
IBA (1.0) 7.55 0.00 0.00 2.52
IBA (2.0) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Control 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mean 5.22 2.26 2.34  
C.D(p ≤ 0.05) Media (A)= 0.705, IBA(B)= 0.815, A×B=1.411

Table 5: Effect of media type and IBA level (mgl-1) on rooting (%).

horticulture-Rooting

Figure 4: Rooting using ½ MS fortified with IBA (0.1 mgl-1).

Data in (Table 6) clearly reveals that the highest number of roots per explant (1.25) was produced in M1, which is significantly higher than those obtained on M2 and M3.

Growth
regulator (mgl-1)
Media Mean
M1(1/2 MS) M2(MS) M3(WPM)
IBA (0.1) 2.20 2.01 1.81 2.01
IBA (1.0) 2.79 0.00 0.00 0.93
IBA (2.0) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Control 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mean 1.25 0.50 0.45  
C.D(p ≤ 0.05) Media (A)= 0.057, IBA(B)= .066, A×B=.114

Table 6: Effect of media type and IBA level (mgl-1) on number of roots per explant.

Maximum number of roots per explant (2.01) was obtained by using IBA at 0.1 mgl-1 irrespective of media used. M1 medium fortified with IBA (1.0 mgl-1) resulted in significantly higher number of roots per explant (2.79) than what was obtained in M1 medium fortified with IBA (0.1 mgl-1).

Perusal of data in (Table 7) clearly reveals that there is significant effect of rooting media and IBA levels on average length of roots. Irrespective of IBA levels, M1 induced average root length of 11.00 mm as compared to 7.79 mm on M3 and 7.04 mm on M2 medium. While as IBA at 0.1 mgl-1 resulted in maximum average root length of 27.41 mm, which is significantly higher than 7.03 mm observed at IBA (1.0 mgl-1). Interaction effect revealed that roots of maximum length were produced in M3 medium fortified with IBA (0.1 mgl-1) having average length of 31.15 mm, which is significantly higher than other treatment combinations.

Growth
regulator (mgl-1)
Media Mean
M1(1/2 MS) M2(MS) M3(WPM)
IBA (0.1) 22.90 28.17 31.15 27.41
IBA (1.0) 21.10 0.00 0.00 7.03
IBA (2.0) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Control 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mean 11.00 7.04 7.79  
C.D(p ≤ 0.05) Media (A)= 1.226, IBA(B)= 1.416, A×B=2.452

Table 7: Effect of media type and IBA level (mgl-1) on average length of roots (mm).

As compared to IBA, NAA induced higher rooting irrespective of type of rooting media used (Table 8). Data from Table 9 clearly reveals that M1 induced the highest rooting (13.49%) in Kainth. NAA at 1.0 mgl-1 resulted in maximum rooting (24.83%), which is significantly higher than 22.35 per cent obtained at NAA (0.1 mgl-1). A treatment combination of M1 with NAA (1.0 mgl-1) resulted maximum rooting of 29.61 per cent (Figure 5).

Growth
regulator (mgl-1)
Media Mean
M1(1/2 MS) M2(MS) M3(WPM)
NAA (0.1) 24.35 23.41 19.30 22.35
NAA (1.0) 29.61 24.94 19.95 24.83
NAA (2.0) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Control 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mean 13.49 12.09 9.81  
C.D(p ≤ 0.05) Media (A)=1.006, NAA(B)=1.162, A×B=2.012

Table 8: Effect of media type and NAA level (mgl-1) on rooting (%).

horticulture-fortified

Figure 5: Rooting using ½ MS fortified with NAA (1.0 mgl-1).

With regard to effect on number of roots per explant using different types of rooting media fortified with various levels of NAA showed that M1 resulted in maximum number of roots per explant. From the perusal of data in (Table 9), significantly more number of roots per explant (3.07) were observed using NAA (1.0 mgl-1), irrespective of media. M1 fortified with NAA (1.0 mgl-1) resulted in the highest number of roots per explant (3.40).

Growth
regulator (mgl-1)
Media Mean
M1(1/2 MS) M2(MS) M3(WPM)
NAA (0.1) 3.02 2.78 2.43 2.74
NAA (1.0) 3.40 3.22 2.60 3.07
NAA (2.0) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Control 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mean 1.61 1.50 1.26  
C.D(p ≤ 0.05) Media (A)= 0.057, NAA(B)= 0.065, A×B=0.113

Table 9: Effect of media type and NAA level (mgl-1) on number of roots per explant.

Data in (Table 10) shows that average length of roots in Kainth is significantly affected by rooting media and NAA levels. As far as media is concerned, M3 resulted in longer roots (11.04 mm) irrespective of NAA level. NAA at 0.1 mgl-1 resulted in significantly longer roots (20.53 mm) when compared to 16.97 obtained at NAA (1.0 mgl-1).

Growth
regulator (mgl-1)
Media Mean
M1(1/2 MS) M2(MS) M3(WPM)
NAA (0.1) 18.23 20.40 22.97 20.53
NAA (1.0) 14.33 15.37 21.20 16.97
NAA (2.0) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Control 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mean 8.14 8.94 11.04  
C.D(p ≤ 0.05) Media (A)= 0.919, NAA(B)= 1.061, A×B=1.837

Table 10: Effect of media type and NAA level (mgl-1) on average length of roots (mm).

A treatment combination of M3 fortified with NAA (0.1 mgl-1) resulted in maximum average length of roots (22.97 mm) which is followed by 21.20 mm in M3 medium fortified with NAA (1.0 mgl-1). These two treatments were statistically at par in terms of controlling average root length.

Thakur [29] and Thakur and Kanwar [3] also reported better rooting response of Kainth as compared to scion varieties. Like the multiplication rate, rooting ability being genotype dependent [30] and rootstocks usually root with greater ability than scions [31]. The mineral concentration in the culture medium affects rooting characteristic and some researchers have proposed that reduction of salt strength to half strength improved rooting [32].

The reason behind increasing rooting rate on half strength culture medium might be due to a disorder in carbohydrate to nitrogen in nutrient medium, which lead to decreasing nitrogen level in shoot and then improving rooting rate, initiation roots, increasing root number and lengths [33]. Higher rooting response in Kainth using NAA than IBA is in conformity with [3,29]. Better rooting response of pear genotypes with NAA is in concordance to the findings of Singha [34] who preferred NAA over IBA for inducing roots in P. communis cv. Seckel to avoid the basal callus formation. Reed [35] also found that some pear genotypes rooted better on NAA than on IBA. Too high an auxin concentration in rooting media is undesirable as it leads reduction in rooting by inducing basal callus formation [36] or by inhibiting the root elongation [37]. This may be the reason for poor rooting response at higher auxin concentration in the present study.

References

  1. Baviera JA, Garcia JL, Ibarra M(1989) Commercial in vitro micropropagation in pear cv. Conference. Acta Hort., 256: 63-68.
  2. Hassanen SA, Gabr MF(2012) In vitro propagation of pear (Pyrusbetulaefolia) rootstock. American-Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci., 12: 484-489.
  3. Thakur A, Kanwar JS(2008)Micropropagation of ‘wild pear’ Pyruspyrifolia (Burm F.) Nakai. II. Induction of rooting. Not. Bot. Hort. Agrobot. Cluj., 36:104–111.
  4. Yeo DY, Reed BM(1995)Micropropagation of three Pyrus rootstocks. Hort Sci., 30: 620-623.
  5. Antunes de MLK, Claudia F, Leandro C, Lima da SA(2004) In vitro establishment and multiplication of Pyruscalleryana D-6 on double-phase culture system. Brazil. Mag. Fruit Cult., 26: 403-405.
  6. Dolcet-Sanjuan R, Mok DWS,Mok MC(1990)Micropropagation of Pyrus and Cydonia and their responses to Fe-limiting conditions. Pl. Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 16: 191-199.
  7. Ruzic DJ, Vujovic T, Nikolic D,Cerovic R(2011) In vitro growth responses of the ‘Pyrodwarf’ pear rootstock to cytokinin types. Roman. Biotech. Lett., 16: 6630-6637.
  8. Rahman AE, Al-Ansary MF, Rizkalla AA, Badr-Elden AM(2007)Micropropagation and biochemical genetic markers detection for drought and salt tolerance of pear rootstock. Aust. J. Basic Applied Sci., 1: 625-636.
  9. De Paoli G(1989)Micropropagation of pear cultivars. InformatoreAgrario., 43: 71-73.
  10. Fan KH, Jiang ZT(1993) Studies on callus induction and plantlet regeneration from apple cotyledon. J. Shanghai Agric. Coll., 11: 243-248.
  11. Mondal, Gupta MS,Mukhrejee BB(1994) Callus culture and plantlet production in Carica papaya (var. Honey Dew). Pl. Cell Rep., 18: 873-878.
  12. Caboni E, Tonelli MG, Lauri P, Angeli SD, Damiano C(1999) In vitro shoot regeneration from leaves of wild pear. Pl. Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 59: 1-7.
  13. Chakravarty B, Goswami BC(1999) Plantlet regeneration from long term callus cultures of Citrus acidaRoxb. and the uniformity of regenerated plants. Scientia Hort., 82: 159-169.
  14. Akbar MA, Karmakar BK, Roy SK(2003) Callus induction and high frequency plant regeneration of pine apple (Ananascomosus L. Mers.) Pl. Tiss. Cult., 13: 109- 116.
  15. Canli FA,Tian L(2008) In vitro shoot regeneration from stored mature cotyledons of sweet cherry (Prunusavium L.) cultivars. Scientia Hort., 116: 34-40
  16. Peer FA, Rather ZA, Dar KR, Mir MA,Hussain G(2013) Studies of in vitro propagation of sweet cherry cv. Bigarreau Noir Grossa. Indian J. Hort., 70: 317-322.
  17. Bairu MW, Jain N, Stirk WA, Dolezal K, van Staden J(2009) Solving the problem of shoot-tip necrosis in Harpagophytumprocumbens by changing the cytokinin types, calcium and boron concentrations in the medium. S. Afr. J. Bot., 75:122–127.
  18. Karimpour S, Davarynejad GH, Bagheri A,Tehranifar A(2013) In vitro establishment and clonal propagation of Sebri pear cultivar. J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 15: 1209-1217.
  19. Dwivedi SK,Bist LD(1999) In vitro propagation of low-chill pear cv. Gola. Indian J. Hort., 56: 189-193.
  20. Kadota M, Imizu K, Hirano T(2001) Double-phase in vitro culture using sorbitol increases shoot proliferation and reduces hyperhydricity in Japanese pear. Scientia Hort., 89: 207-215.
  21. Sedlak J,Paprstein F(2003) Influence of growth regulators on In Vitro propagation of Pyruscommunis cv. Koporecka. Acta Hort., 616: 25-29.
  22. Cosac AC,Frasin LB(2008) In vitro propagation of some pear cultivars. Acta Hort., 800: 447-452.
  23. Isikalan C, Namli S, Akbas F, ErolAk B(2011)Micrografting of almond (Amygdaluscommunis) cultivar ‘Nonpariel’. Aus. J. Crop Sci., 5: 61-65.
  24. Soni M, Thakur M,Modgil M(2011) In vitro multiplication of Merton I. 793-An apple rootstock suitable for replantation. Indian J. Biotech., 10: 362-368.
  25. Hu CY, Wang PJ(1983) Meristem, shoot tip and bud culture. In: D A Evans, W R Sharp, P V Ammirato and Y Yamada (eds.) Handbook of Plant cell culture vol I. MacMillan, New York. pp. 177-227.
  26. Hassan SAM(2012) Studies on improving flowering and fruiting of leconte pears. Ph.D. Hort., Dept. Fac. of Cairo Univ.
  27. Tange H, Low Y,Lui C(2008) Plant regenerate from in vitro leaves of four commercial pyrus species. Pl. Soil Environ., 54: 140-148.
  28. Mustafa NS, Rania A,Taha SAM, Hassan, Nagwa SMZ(2013) Effect of medium strength and carbon source on in vitro shoot multiplication of two Ficuscarica cultivars. J. Applied Sci. Res., 9: 3068-3074.
  29. Thakur A(2004) Studies on In vitro clonal propagation and somatic cell culture in Pyrus species. Ph.D thesis submitted to Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab.
  30. Sharma T, Modgil M, Thakur M(2007) Factors affecting induction and development of in vitro rooting in apple rootstocks. Indian J. Exp. Bio., 45:824-829
  31. Dobránszky J,Teixeira da Silva JA(2010)Micropropagation of apple-a review. Biotechnol. Adv., 28:462-488.
  32. Dimassi-Theriou K,Economou A(1993) The effect of the explants type and the nutrient substrate composition on shoot production in in vitro cultures of the rootstock GF-677 (P persica x P amygdalus). In Scientific Annals. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, p: 31-35.
  33. Fotopoulos S,Sotiropoulos TE(2005) In vitro rooting of PR 204/84 rootstock (Prunuspersica x P. amygdalus) as influenced by mineral concentration of the culture medium and exposure to darkness for a period Agron. Res., 3: 3–8.
  34. Singha S(1980) In vitro propagation of ‘Seckel’ Pear. In : R H Zimmerman (ed.) Procedings of the Conference on nursery production of fruit plants through tissue culture : applications and fasibility. USDA. pp. 59-63.
  35. Reed BM, (19 95) Screening Pyrusgermplasms for in vitro rooting response. Hort Sci., 30: 1292-1294.
  36. Lane WD(1979) Regeneration of pear plants from shoot meristem tips. PlSciLett, 16: 337-342.
  37. Thimann KV(1977) Hormone action in the life of plant. Univ. of Massachusetts Press, Amherts. p.510.
Citation: Rehman HU (2015) In vitro Propagation of Kainth (Pyrus pashia) Using Explants from Forced Cutting. J Horticulture 2: 127.

Copyright: ©2015 Rehman HU. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top