Pharmaceutical Analytical Chemistry: Open Access
Open Access

Innovative Bioanalytical Techniques Transforming Pharmacokinetic Research

Poorna Basuri^{* *}Correspondence: Poorna Basuri, Department of Analytical Chemistry, University of Jawaharlal Nehru Technology, Hyderabad, India, Email:

Author info »

Description

Bioanalytical methods play a pivotal role in pharmaceutical research, particularly in understanding the pharmacokinetics of drugs with in biological systems [1]. These methods are essential for quantifying drug concentrations in complex biological form such as blood, urine, and tissues. The development of sensitive and selective bioanalytical techniques has significantly contributed to the advancement of pharmacokinetic studies, enabling researchers to gain insights into drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion profiles [2]. This article explores recent developments and challenges in bioanalytical methods for pharmacokinetic analysis.

Mass Spectrometry (MS) in bioanalysis

Mass Spectrometry (MS) has emerged as a basis technique in bioanalytical chemistry due to its unparalleled sensitivity and specificity [3]. In pharmacokinetic studies, Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is widely utilized for the quantification of drugs and their metabolites in biological samples. Recent advancements in MS instrumentation, such as high-resolution MS and triple quadrupole MS, have enhanced the accuracy and precision of pharmacokinetic measurements [4]. Additionally, novel sample preparation techniques, including solid-phase extraction and micro extraction, have improved the efficiency and throughput of bioanalytical workflows [5].

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) in bioanalysis

High-performance liquid chromatography remains a basis technique in bioanalytical chemistry, particularly in conjunction with mass spectrometry for pharmacokinetic studies [6]. HPLC offers excellent resolution and versatility in separating complex mixtures of analyses present in biological samples. Recent developments in HPLC column technologies, including superficially porous particles and monolithic columns, have enabled faster separations with improved sensitivity and peak symmetry [7]. Moreover, innovative stationary phases and mobile phase compositions have enhanced the selectivity and robustness of HPLC methods for pharmacokinetic analysis.

Immunoassays for biomarker detection

Immunoassays, such as Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays (ELISA) and Radioimmunoassay (RIA), are invaluable tools for quantifying biomarkers and drug molecules in biological samples [8]. In pharmacokinetic studies, immunoassays offer high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of target analyses, making them suitable for large-scale clinical trials and bioequivalence studies. Recent advancements in immunoassay technologies, including multiplex assays and microfluidic platforms, have facilitated high-throughput analysis of pharmacokinetic parameters with minimal sample volume requirements [9]. However, immunoassays may suffer from limitations such as cross-reactivity and matrix interference, necessitating careful method validation and optimization.

Micro dialysis for in-vivo sampling

Microdialysis is a minimally invasive sampling technique that allows continuous monitoring of drug concentrations in interstitial fluid or blood in vivo [10]. This technique provides real-time pharmacokinetic data, enabling researchers to assess drug kinetics at specific anatomical sites or disease states. Recent innovations in micro dialysis probes, such as miniaturized designs and integrated sensors, have enhanced the spatial and temporal resolution of sampling. Moreover, coupling micro dialysis with online analytical techniques, such as HPLC or MS, enables direct analysis of dialysate samples, eliminating the need for offline sample processing.

Challenges and future perspectives

Despite significant advancements, bioanalytical methods for pharmacokinetic studies face several challenges, including assay standardization, method validation, and regulatory compliance. Harmonization of analytical procedures and implementation of Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) guidelines are essential to ensure the reliability and reproducibility of pharmacokinetic data. Additionally, emerging trends such as micro sampling techniques and microfluidic-based assays hold potential for further enhancing the sensitivity, speed, and cost-effectiveness of bioanalytical methods in pharmacokinetic studies.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the development of sensitive and selective bioanalytical methods has revolutionized pharmacokinetic research, enabling comprehensive characterization of drug disposition in biological systems. Mass Spectrometry (MS), High- Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC), immunoassays, and micro dialysis are among the key techniques utilized for quantifying drug concentrations and understanding pharmacokinetic profiles. Continued innovation and collaboration across disciplines are essential to address current challenges and propel the field of bioanalysis towards precision medicine and personalized therapeutics.

References

1. Suseela MN, Mehata AK, Vallamkonda B, Gokul P, Pradhan A, Pandey J, et al. Comparative evaluation of liquid-liquid extraction and nanosorbent extraction for HPLC-PDA analysis of cabazitaxel from rat plasma. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2024;245 :116149.

   [Crossref] [Google scholar] [Pubmed]

2. Guettai N, Kadmi Y, Puri M, Kerkich K, Bouargane B. Occurrence, analysis and removal processes of emerging pharmaceuticals from waters for the protection and preservation of a sustainable environment: a review. J. Clean. Prod. 2024:142654.

   [Crossref] [Google scholar]

3. He B, Feng J, Liu J, Zhong Q, Zhou T. Inline phase transition trapping-selective supercritical fluid extraction-supercritical fluid chromatography: A green and efficient integrated method for determining prohibited substances in cosmetics. Anal Chim Acta. 2023;1279 :341831.

   [Crossref] [Google scholar] [Pubmed]

4. Iwamoto N, Umino Y, Aoki C, Yamane N, Hamada A, Shimada T. Fully validated LCMS bioanalysis of Bevacizumab in human plasma using nano-surface and molecular-orientation limited (nSMOL) proteolysis. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2016;31(1):46-50.

   [Crossref] [Google scholar] [Pubmed]

5. Lanshoeft C, Cianférani S, Heudi O. Generic hybrid ligand binding assay liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry-based workflow for multiplexed human immunoglobulin G1 quantification at the intact protein level: application to preclinical pharmacokinetic studies. Anal Chem. 2017;89(4):2628-2635.

   [Crossref] [Google scholar] [Pubmed]

6. Liu Y, Wang X, Yu J, Guo X. Chiral separation and molecular simulation study of six antihistamine agents on a coated cellulose tri‐(3, 5‐dimethylphenycarbamate) column (Chiralcel OD‐RH) and its recognition mechanisms. Electrophoresis. 2021;42(14-15):1461-1472.

   [Crossref] [Google scholar] [Pubmed]

7. Ratih R, Wätzig H, Azminah A, Asmari M, Peters B, El Deeb S. Immobilization of chondroitin sulfate a onto monolithic epoxy silica column as a new chiral stationary phase for high-performance liquid chromatographic enantioseparation. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021;14(2):98.

   [Crossref] [Google scholar] [Pubmed]

8. Swanson EC, Schleiss MR. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection: new prospects for prevention and therapy. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2013;60(2):335-349.

   [Crossref] [Google scholar] [Pubmed]

9. Griffiths PD. Burden of disease associated with human cytomegalovirus and prospects for elimination by universal immunisation. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12(10):790-798.

   [Crossref] [Google scholar] [Pubmed]

10. Sweet C. The pathogenicity of cytomegalovirus. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1999;23(4):457-482.

    [Crossref] [Google scholar] [Pubmed]