Journal of Information Technology & Software Engineering
Open Access

Integrating Analytics Tools for Advanced Monitoring to Improve Software Performance

Marco Angela^{* *}Correspondence: Marco Angela, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada, Email:

Author info »

Description

In the ever-changing world of software development, producing dependable, responsive, and scalable systems depends on performance optimization. In order to accomplish these objectives, monitoring and analytics tools are essential since they offer perceptions into the actions of applications, point out difficulties, and facilitate the early detection and resolution of performance problems. Improving an application's responsiveness, efficiency, and scalability while reducing resource usage and delay are known as software performance optimization. For various reasons, efficient analytics and monitoring are important. Realtime visibility into application performance data is made possible by monitoring tools, which help identify and fix problems before they affect end users. Analytics tools facilitate goal-setting and continual development by comparing current performance measurements to specified standards or historical data [1]. Through the prediction of future resource requirements based on current consumption trends and performance metrics, insights from monitoring tools aid in capacity planning. Improved user experience, lower bounce rates, higher customer satisfaction, and higher retention are all results of performance optimization. Reducing infrastructure expenditures and operating expenses related to application scalability and maintenance is possible through performance optimization and efficient resource usage [2,3].

A variety of capabilities are included in monitoring and analytic solutions, which are intended to gather, process, and present performance data. Real-time monitoring of application metrics such as error rates, productivity, response times, and resource usage. Proactive alerting systems that in response to preset limits, inform relevant parties when there is a decline in performance or other irregularities. Graphical dashboard and report depiction of performance data that makes trend analysis and interpretation simple. Instruments for carrying out in-depth performance analysis is used to assist in determining the root causes and establish priorities for remedial action. Maintaining records of prior performance and assessing them for evaluations, trend analysis, and capacity planning [4]. Integration across several platforms, services, and frameworks are used to collect comprehensive performance data on the entire application stack. Large-volume data-handling and scalable systems can be adjusted to a variety of application contexts (such as on-premises and cloud). The industry uses a number of tools extensively for tracking and improving software performance. New Relic is renowned for its extensive Application Performance Monitoring (APM) features. It offers real-time insights into synthetic, infrastructure, and application performance monitoring [5].

Enabling effortless integration with cloud platforms such as AWS and Azure provides consistent visibility throughout distributed systems. A complete monitoring system that offers insights into application performance, infrastructure monitoring, and user experience through the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and analytics. In addition to focusing on business performance monitoring and Application Performance Monitoring (APM), this system offers anomaly identification and automatic root cause investigation. It also offers end-user monitoring, business transaction tracing, and insight into application performance indicators [6]. Supported environments include cloud and onpremises. Application Performance Monitoring (APM) solutions are provided by Splunk, a company best known for its analytics and log management capabilities. Real-time monitoring and predictive analytics are offered.

An open-source analytics and monitoring tool that works with Prometheus, InfluxDB, and Graphite among other data sources. Grafana makes metrics visualization and dashboard customization possible. Data is stored and indexed using Elastic search, processed and enhanced using Logstash, and visualized and dash boarded using Kibana. When combined, they offer strong log management and monitoring features. The following best practices should be taken into consideration in order to maximize the effectiveness of monitoring and analytics tools for software performance optimization [7]. Prior to choosing and putting monitoring technologies into place, clearly identify performance targets and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) that are in line with company objectives. Select the monitoring solutions that best suit the requirements, taking into account aspects like application stack support, scalability, and integration capabilities. To prioritize optimization efforts, pay close attention to Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) pertaining to application response time, productivity, error rates, and resource use. Establish standards for performance and specify alert levels to proactively spot and handle performance discrepancies. To obtain comprehensive visibility, maintain vigilant tabs on each level of the application stack, which include servers, databases, networks, and outside services. To address performance issues promptly and minimize manual interaction, automate monitoring workflows and remedial steps [8]. Before deploying, undertake frequent load testing and performance testing to mimic real-world circumstances and spot any possible bottlenecks. To guarantee agreement on performance goals, KPIs, and priorities, encourage communication between the development, operations, and business teams.

Analyzing case studies may provide clarity on how businesses use analytics and monitoring tools to maximize performance. An international e-commerce platform saw a 20% increase in conversion rates after using New Relic to monitor and optimize application performance in real-time during periods of high traffic [9,10]. A financial services business used Dynatrace's AIpowered analytics to identify and fix performance issues across its dispersed application ecosystem, resulting in a 50% reduction in Mean Time To Resolution (MTTR). By using Datadog to monitor and optimize the functioning of their telemedicine application and guarantee high availability and dependability, a healthcare provider improved patient care.

Conclusion

Software performance optimization can only be achieved with the help of monitoring and analytics tools, which offer visibility, insights, and useful data for ongoing development. Organizations may maintain a competitive edge in the current digital world, improve customer experience, and save operating costs by successfully utilizing these tools. Software application efficiency, scalability, and dependability are all dependent on investing in strong monitoring and analytics solutions as technologies advance and application structures grow more sophisticated.

References

1. Fang C, Mu D, Deng Z, Wu Z. Word-sentence co-ranking for automatic extractive text summarization. Expert Syst Appl. 2017;72:189-195.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

2. Indu M, Kavitha KV. Review on text summarization evaluation methods. In 2016 International Conference on Research Advances in Integrated Navigation Systems (RAINS). 2016;1-4.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

3. Kiyoumarsi F. Evaluation of automatic text summarizations based on human summaries. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2015;192:83-91.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

4. Moen H, Peltonen LM, Heimonen J, Airola A, Pahikkala T, Salakoski T, et al. Comparison of automatic summarisation methods for clinical free text notes. Artif Intell Med. 2016,67:25-37.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

5. Allahyari M, Pouriyeh S, Assefi M, Safaei S, Trippe ED, Gutierrez JB, et al. Text summarization techniques: A brief survey. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl. 2017;8(10).

   [Google Scholar]

6. Feblowitz JC, Wright A, Singh H, Samal L, Sittig DF. Summarization of clinical information: A conceptual model. J Biomed Inform. 2011;44(4):688-699.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

7. PadmaLahari E, Kumar DS, Prasad S. Automatic text summarization with statistical and linguistic features using successive thresholds. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Communications, Control and Computing Technologies. 2014,1519-1524.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

8. Moradi M, Ghadiri N. Quantifying the informativeness for biomedical literature summarization: An itemset mining method. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2017;146:77-89.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

9. Narayan S, Cohen SB, Lapata M. Ranking sentences for extractive summarization with reinforcement learning. Association for Computational Linguistics, Louisiana, 2018, 1747-1759.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

10. Erdirencelebi D, Yalpir S. Adaptive network fuzzy inference system modeling for the input selection and prediction of anaerobic digestion effluent quality. Appl Math Model. 2011;35(8):3821-3832.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]