Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
Open Access

ISSN: 2155-9570

Case Report - (2015) Volume 6, Issue 3

Intraretinal Silicone Oil Infiltration following Traumatic Macular Hole Repair

Matthew Benage1, Richard Hwang2, Frank Siringo2, Hugo Quiroz-Mercado2, Scott CN Oliver2, Naresh Mandava2, Marc T Mathias2 and Jeffrey L Olson2
1University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, Missouri, USA
2Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA

Abstract

Purpose: To present a case study describing incorporation of silicone oil into a traumatic macular hole following surgical correction.
Methods: Case report
Results: A nine-year-old male presented with a traumatic macular hole. After waiting for spontaneous closure, pars plana vitrectomy with standard 1000 centistroke silicone oil tamponade was performed. Postoperatively, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, demonstrated closure of the macular hole, but with infiltration of silicone oil into the foveal architecture. A second surgical approach with different attempts to remove the retained silicone oil's bubble was successfully performed using a soft-tip cannula. However, the macular hole reopened intraoperatively. Therefore silicone oil was replaced with no infiltration and adequate closure of the macular hole.
Conclusion: Previous reports have demonstrated small droplets of retained silicone oil within the retinal layers, but to our knowledge, this is the first report of a large globule of oil becoming incorporated into a healing macular hole.

Keywords: Silicone oil; Traumatic macular hole; Vitrectomy

Introduction

Compared to idiopathic macular holes, traumatic macular holes tend to occur in younger patients, present with worse initial vision, and are thought to be related to the transmission of tangential tractional forces on the macula. [1,2]. It is well known that traumatic MHs may spontaneously close with time. However the choice and the timing for surgery may be debated and patients may undergo a surgical approach in some cases. Once spontaneous resolution is not achieved, pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane peel and endotamponade is typically the treatment of choice, using either gas or silicone oil. Studies have shown both to be successful in anatomic closure of macular holes, with gas showing some advantages in visual acuity[3]. Silicone oil may provide an advantage compared to gas by being less dependent upon postoperative positioning; however, a second procedure is needed for oil removal. There have been some reports of emulsified oil migrating into the retina across the internal limiting membrane (ILM)[4]. Chung and colleagues hypothesized that ILM peeling enabled emulsified oil droplets to enter the retina[5].

Herein, we present a surgical case complicated by incorporation of silicone oil into the healing macular hole, requiring additional intervention.

Case Report

A nine year old male presented to the retina service with loss of central vision in the left eye, two months after a baseball injury to the left periocular adnexa. Best-corrected visual acuity, (BCVA) left eye was 20/100, intraocular pressure 14 mmHg, and the anterior segment and periorbita were without signs of trauma or active inflammation, other than mild posterior subcapsular cataract. Dilated fundus examination was remarkable only for a full-thickness macular hole of the left eye as seen with optical coherence tomography (Figure 1A). The perifoveal region had mild retinal pigment epithelial changes thought to be secondary to resolved commotio retinae.

clinical-experimental-ophthalmology-Optical-coherence

Figure 1: Optical coherence tomography of patient’s progression. A) Full-thickness traumatic macular hole upon presentation. B) Large globule of silicone oil (arrowhead) which has become incorporated into the healing macular hole, 3 weeks after surgery. Note the shadowing of the underlying retina and RPE (arrow). C) Return of normal foveal architecture following aspiration of the oil globule from the macular hole, and repeat SO placement (10 weeks after initial surgery) D) Final OCT with closure of the macular hole, mild underlying outer retinal changes (8 months after initial trauma).

After waiting an additional six weeks for signs of spontaneous closure, the decision was made to perform surgery. A 25 gauge pars plana vitrectomy with kenalog-assisted induction of a posterior vitreous separation and internal limiting membrane peeling was performed. The ILM peeling was completed with indocyanine green (ICG) staining, with the final concentration of 2.5 mg/cc applied for 60 seconds. Silicone oil (1000 centistroke) tamponade with was used rather than gas, as the patient lived at an altitude of 6,500 feet compared with our surgical center’s altitude of 5,280 feet, and travel home required traversing mountain passes in excess of 10,000 feet.

Three weeks post-operatively, the macular hole appeared to be closed on exam under silicone oil, but the patient complained of a large circle in his central vision. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, (SD-OCT, Heidelberg Engineering) demonstrated closure of the macular hole and dimpling of the inner retinal surface consistent with an ILM peel [6], but with infiltration of silicone oil into the foveal architecture (Figure 1B). BCVA was 20/400.

Four weeks later, pars plana vitrectomy and silicone oil replacement was performed. After the main silicone oil bubble had been removed, there was a small oil globule which appeared trapped in the foveal tissue. Attempts were made to manually dislocate it using a soft tip cannula and a brush, but without success. The intraretinal oil could only be removed by using a soft-tip cannula with active aspiration, which caused the macular hole to re-open. Silicone oil tamponade was repeated, with instructions to maintain upright positioning during the day, and right side down at night.

Post-operatively, the patient noted that the circle in the center of his vision had resolved, and BCVA under silicone oil was 20/100. SD-OCT demonstrated closure of the macular hole without silicone oil infiltration into the retina (Figure 1C).

Two months later, and six months after initial presentation, silicone oil was removed, final visual acuity was 20/80, and SD-OCT with enface view demonstrated closure of the macular hole with some persistent subfoveal ellipsoid zone disruption (Figures 1D and 2C).

clinical-experimental-ophthalmology-Enface-OCT-image

Figure 2: A) Enface OCT image displaying a full-thickness macular hole (2 months after initial trauma) B) Enface OCT image taken through SO, displaying silicone oil droplet trapped in the macular hole and dimpling of the retinal surface post-ILM peel (3 weeks following initial surgery) C) Final enface OCT image displaying closure of the macular hole, 8 months after initial trauma D) Intraoperative image displaying silicone oil droplet trapped in the macular hole (arrowhead).

Discussion

The most common etiology for MHs is idiopathic, though some vascular retinal disease have been observed [7,8]. However, it has been postulated that both anteroposterior and tangential tractions could play an important role in MH formation. Traumatic macular holes spontaneously close at higher rates than idiopathics. Typically these are smaller holes, without a fluid cuff [9], therefore there is some controversy whether to wait or perform early surgery. However, when surgery is pursued, in most cases macular holes are successfully treated by PPV with ILM peeling and endotamponade (70-96% closure rate) [10,11]. Nevertheless, the management, duration and type of tamponade are still debated.

Standard silicone oil migration into the retina is an uncommon occurrence following vitrectomy, and may be related to duration of silicone oil placement, oil emulsification, and presence or absence of the ILM [12]. Previous reports have demonstrated small emulsified droplets within the substance of the retina, but to our knowledge, this is the first report of a large globule of oil becoming incorporated into a healing macular hole. Emulsification of silicone oil is more common in patients with higher activity levels, which may have played a role in this case.

In patients that live at an altitude significantly higher than the location of surgery, silicone oil is often the default choice, even though it is not free from potential complications.

Disclosures

Financial support: none

The authors have no financial or proprietary interest in anything discussed in this manuscript. This manuscript has not been presented at any meeting or conference.

References

  1. Steel DH, Lotery AJ (2013) Idiopathic vitreomacular traction and macular hole: a comprehensive review of pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Eye (Lond) 27 Suppl 1: S1-21.
  2. McDonnell PJ, Fine SL, Hillis AI (1982) Clinical features of idiopathic macular cysts and holes. Am J Ophthalmol 93: 777-786.
  3. Tafoya ME, Lambert HM, Vu L, Ding M (2003) Visual outcomes of silicone oil versus gas tamponade for macular hole surgery. SeminOphthalmol 18: 127-131.
  4. Eckardt C, Nicolai U, Czank M, Schmidt D (1992) Identification of silicone oil in the retina after intravitreal injection. Retina 12: S17-S22.
  5. Chung J, Spaide R Intraretinal silicone oil vacuoles after macular hole surgery with internal limiting membrane peeling. Am J Ophthalmol 136: 766-767.
  6. Alkabes M, Salinas C, Vitale L, Bures-Jelstrup A, Nucci P, Mateo C (2011) En face optical coherence tomography of inner retinal defects after internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic macular hole. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52: 8349-8355.
  7. Leibovitch I, Azmon B, Pianka P, Alster Y, Loewenstein A (2003) Macular hole secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion diagnosed by Retinal Thickness Analyzer. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 34: 53-56.
  8. Olson JL, Mandava N (2006) Macular hole formation associated with idiopathic parafoveal telangiectasia. Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von GraefesArchiv fur klinische und experimentelleOphthalmologie 244: 411-412.
  9. Kusaka S, Fujikado T, Ikeda T, Tano Y (1997) Spontaneous disappearance of traumatic macular holes in young patients. Am J Ophthalmol 123: 837-839.
  10. Amari F, Ogino N, Matsumura M, Negi A, Yoshimura N (1999) Vitreous surgery for traumatic macular holes. Retina 19: 410-413.
  11. Johnson RN, McDonald HR, Lewis H, Grand MG, Murray TG, et al. (2001) Traumatic macular hole: observations, pathogenesis, and results of vitrectomy surgery. Ophthalmology 108: 853-857.
  12. Ohira A, Wilson CA, deJuan E Jr, Murata Y, Soji T, et al. (1991) Experimental retinal tolerance to emulsified silicone oil. Retina 11: 259-265.
Citation: Benage M, Hwang R, Siringo F, Quiroz-Mercado H, Oliver SCN (2015) Intraretinal Silicone Oil Infiltration following Traumatic Macular Hole Repair. J Clin Exp Ophthalmol 6:442.

Copyright: © 2013 Jung YG. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top