Clinical & Experimental Cardiology

Clinical & Experimental Cardiology
Open Access

ISSN: 2155-9880

+44 1300 500008

Research Article - (2016) Volume 7, Issue 3

Left & Right Ventricular Myocardial Performance Index and it’s Relation with TIMI Frame Count in the Coronary Slow Flow Phenomenon

Khaled Sayed Mahmoud*
Assistant Professor, Cardiology Department, El Minia University Hospital, Egypt
*Corresponding Author: Khaled Sayed Mahmoud, Assistant Professor, Cardiology Department, Elminia University Hospital, Al Salam Strminia, 002, Egypt, Tel: 002 08675552032505, Fax: 0022505 Email:

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the left and right ventricular myocardial performance index in patients with coronary slow flow phenomenon and to determine the relationship between it and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count in SCF patients.

Material and methods: 45 patients with slow coronary flow; mean age 51 ± 12 years and 20 subjects with angiographically normal coronary; mean age 52 ± 12 years, were included in the study. All the subjects underwent echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging to determine left & right ventricular diastolic functions and myocardial performance index (MPI).

Results: The TDE parameters obtained from the left and right ventricles showed. LV Sm, and Am, was similar in both the SCF and control groups; however, LV Em, Em/Am, IRT and MPI were significantly different in the SCF group compared to the control. RV wall Sm, and Am were similar in both the SCF and control groups however, RV Em, Em/Am, IRT and MPI were significantly different in the SCF group compared to the control. Patients had significantly higher TFC for each major epicardial coronary artery (P < 0.001). TFC was positively correlated with the left ventricle MPI index (r = 0.61, p < 0.001), the right ventricle MPI index (r = 0.49, p < 0.001), and mitral IVRT (r = 0.61, p < 0.001). There was a strong inverse correlation between mean TFC and left ventricle Ea and Ea/Aa ratio (r = -0.70, p < 0.001; r = -0.45, p = 0.001, respectively).

Conclusion: Left and right ventricular diastolic functions deteriorated in the CSF phenomenon and this deterioration was associated with increased TIMI frame count.

Keywords: Myocardial performance index; Coronary slow flow; TIMI frame count

Introduction

In some patients with chest pain who are scheduled for selective coronary angiography, slow contrast agent passage is observed through the epicardial coronary arteries in the absence of stenosis. This phenomenon has been designated the slow coronary flow (SCF) phenomenon [1]. Functional and morphological abnormalities in the microvasculature, endothelial dysfunction, raised inflammatory markers, occult atherosclerosis, and anatomical factors of epicardial arteries have all been implicated in the pathogenesis of CSF [2]. Myocardial velocity determined by tissue Doppler imaging is a new technique that has been used recently to analyze left ventricular function. The development of tissue Doppler imaging opens up the possibility of also assessing left ventricular function [3,4]. Left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunctions have been reported in the CSF phenomenon but no study in the literature has evaluated right ventricular function in patients with CSF [5-8] myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame count (TFC) method is an objective method for evaluating coronary blood flow. This method measures the number of frames over which the contrast flows from the injection site to a predefined distal point [9]. Previous studies showed that in arteries with slow flow, TFC is significantly increased [10-12]. The aim of the present study was to investigate left and right ventricular functions using conventional and tissue Doppler echocardiography in patients with CSF and to determine the relationship between them and TFC.

Patients and Methods

45 consecutive patients with CSF who had undergone diagnostic Coronary Angiography (CA) between January 2010 and January 2014 in El Minia university hospital. The control group consisted of 20 consecutive patients with normal coronary arteries who had undergone CA during the same period. Indications of CA were determined with positive results of myocardial ischemia in noninvasive tests and typical angina pectoris. All patients were assessed for demographic features, cardiovascular risk factors, laboratory parameters, and medications. The local ethics committee approved the study protocol and written informed consent was obtained.

The exclusion criteria were as follows: previous history of myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, coronary ectasia, patients with valvular heart disease, prosthetic valves, pulmonary, hepatic, renal disease, malignancy, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, left bundle branch block, and a rhythm other than sinus.

Coronary angiography

All patients underwent coronary angiography by the femoral approach using the standard Judkins technique in all subjects. All the cineangiograms were evaluated by an experienced cardiologist.

The diagnosis of SCF was made using the TFC method. CSF was identified using the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame count (TFC) method [4]. In brief, the first frame was accepted when there was more than 70% lumen opacification with antegrade filling. When contrast dye reached distal landmarks, the final frame was determined. The distal landmarks were the distal bifurcation of the left anterior descending artery (LAD), the distal bifurcation of the segment with the longest total distance in the left circumflex artery (LCX) and in the right coronary artery, and the first branch of the posterolateral artery. The LAD is the longest artery among the major coronary arteries. In order to obtain corrected TFC, LAD frame counts were divided by 1.7 as previously reported [13]. LAD and LCx arteries’ TIMI frame counts were evaluated in the right anterior oblique projection with caudal angulation. For the right coronary artery, left anterior oblique projection with cranial angulation was used. The mean TFC was calculated for the LAD, Cx and RCA. Gibson et al. reported cutoff values for TFC (for LAD: 36.2 ± 2.6; for Cx: 22.2 ± 4.1; for RCA: 20.4 ± 3.0) [13]. Any TFC values above these levels were considered CSF.

Echocardiography

Conventional and TDE were performed for all patients using a Vivid 3 Ultrasound machine, in the left decubitus position according to the recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography [14]. LV diameter and thicknesses were measured from the parasternal window with two-dimensional M-mode echocardiography. LV ejection fraction was measured by the modified biplane Simpson’s method [15]. Doppler recordings were obtained with the pulsed sample volume placed at the tip of the mitral leaflets from the apical 4-chamber view. Peak early and late velocities, E-wave deceleration time and isovolumetric relaxation time (IRT) were measured. TDE with active TDE functions. Peak systolic myocardial velocity (Sm), peak early myocardial velocity (Em), and late myocardial velocity (Am) were measured for the lateral segment and the Em/Am ratio was calculated. The IRT was measured from the end of Sm to the beginning of Em, the isovolumetric contraction time was measured from the end of Am to the beginning of Sm, and the time period of Sm was measured as the ejection time. The MPI was calculated using the equation (isovolumetric contraction time + IRT)/ejection time [16]. The Sm, Em, and Am values obtained from the tricuspid annulus were used for the RV MPI.

Statistical analysis

SPSS version 21 was used for the statistical analysis. All the data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Categorical variables were compared via chi-square test. Normally distributed variables were compared across groups by means of Student’s t test, whereas variables that were not normally distributed were compared by Mann-Whitney U test. Pearson’s correlation analysis was used to evaluate relations between the variables. A P value of < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

The clinical characteristics of 45 coronary slow flow patients and 21 normal coronary angiography individuals are presented (Table 1).

Variables Patients Control P
Age (years) 56.1 ± 9.1 53.9 ± 7.9 0.34
Sex (male/female) 25/20 8-Dec 0.33
Body mass index (kg/m) 26.1 ± 1.5 25.7 ± 1.6 0.38
Family history 5 3 0.45
Smoking 15 7 0.36
Diabetes Mellitus 14 6 0.26
Dislipidemia 19 7 0.35
Systolic blood pressure 136 ± 7 140 ± 8 0.62
Diastolic blood pressure 79 ± 16 82 ± 5 0.37
Glucose (mg/dl) 91.8 ± 7 90 ± 7.6 0.49
Serum creatinine (mg/dl) 0.99 ± 0.08 0.99 ± 0.11 0.94
Hemoglobin (g/dl) 13.1 ± 0.6 12.9 ± 0.6 0.25
Total cholesterol (mg/dl) 172.8 ± 26.6 174.4 ± 27 0.83
Triglycerides (mg/dl) 165.7 ± 25 169.3 ± 20 0.58
High density lipoprotein (mg/dl) 31.5 ± 5.5 30 ± 2.2 0.25
Low density lipoprotein (mg/dl) 133 ± 29 126 ± 30 0.14
One vessel with CSF 9 (20%) 0 (0) 0.001
One vessel with CSF 16 (35.5%) 0 (0) 0.001
One vessel with CSF 20 (44.4%) 0 (0) 0.001

Table 1: Demographic and clinical data of both groups.

Age, sex, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, family history, and smoking status did not differ between the CSF patients and the control group. Also, there were no significant differences as regards laboratory data (Table 1) as regards conventional echocardiography parameters, there were no significant difference of LA, LVEDD, LVESD, PW, IVS, EF, and A velocity between the two groups, but the mitral E velocity , E/A ratio were higher in the control than the patients (p = 0.01) and deceleration time of early diastolic filling was significantly higher (p = 0.01) in the patient group (Table 2).

Variables Patients Controls P
LA diameter (mm) 33.5 ± 16 33.92.1 0.52
LVEDD (mm) 47.6 ± 8.4 46.2 ± 5 0.51
LVESD (mm) 28.7 ± 1.2 30 ± 2 0.74
IVS (mm) 9.1 ± 0.4 9.2 ± 0.6 0.5
PW (mm) 8.6 ± 0.73 8.8 ± 0.41 0.45
EF (%) 58.5 ± 7.6 60.3 ± 5.3 0.34
E, cm/s 71.1 ± 6.3 97.4 ± 13.3 0.01
A, cm/s 68.9 ± 5.7 69.3 ± 5.1 0.81
DT, ms 204.2 ± 32.2 183.9 ± 28.8 0.01
E/A 1 ± 0.11 1.2 ± 0.2 0.01
LA: Left atrium LVEDD: Left Ventricle End Diastolic Diameter; LVESD: Left Ventricle End Systolic Diameter; IVS: Interventriculer Septum; EF: Ejection Fraction; RVEDD: Right Ventricle End-Diastolic Diameter; E: Mitral E Velocity; A: Mitral A Velocity; DT: Deceleration Time.

Table 2: Echocardiographic parameters of CSF and the control groups.

The TDE parameters obtained from the left and right ventricles are given (Table 3). Left ventricular MPI was significantly higher in the SCF group compared to the control, also right ventricular MPI was significantly higher in the SCF group than the control.

Variables Patients Controls P
Left ventricle  
Sm,cm/s 7.9 ± 0.4 7.8 ± 0.5 0.96
Em,cm/s 7.3 ± 1.5 12.6 ± 2.3 0.01
Am,cm/s 10.8 ± 0.8 10.90.4 0.77
Em/Am 0.8 ± 0.1 1 ± 0.13 0.01
IRT,ms 100.1 ± 10.3 88 ± 11 0.01
MPI 0.64 ± 0.04 0.49 ± 0.05 0.01
Right ventricle  
Sm,cm/s 12.3 ± 1.9 13.1 ± 1.2 0.41
Em,cm/s 8.2 ± 1.02 12.6 ± 2.3 0.01
Am,cm/s 13.3 ± 0.8 16.1 ± 1,1 0.45
IRT,ms 80.5 ± 10.2 64.6 ± 14.8 0.01
MPI 0.51 ± 0.05 0.44 ± 0.08 0.01
E: Mitral E velocity, A: Mitral A velocity; DT: Deceleration Time; IRT:Isovolumetric Relaxation Time; MPI: Myocardial Performance Index.

Table 3: Tissue Doppler parameters of CSF and control groups.

Patients had significantly higher TFC for each major epicadial coronary artery (P < 0.001) (Table 4). TFC was positively correlated with the left ventricle MPI index (r = 0.61, p < 0.001), the right ventricle MPI index (r = 0.49, p < 0.001), and mitral IVRT (r = 0.61, p < 0,001). There was a strong inverse correlation between mean TFC and left ventricle Ea and Ea/Aa ratio (r = −0.70, p < 0.001; r = −0.45, p = 0.001, respectively) (Table 5), (Figure 1 and 2).

Variables Patients Controls P
LAD 35.1±12.4 14.9±1.3 0.001
LCX 38.7±6.7 17.5±3 0.001
RCA 36.3±7.6 18.2±2.4 0.001
Mean 37.6±5.9 18±2.8 0.001
LAD: Left Anterior Descending Artery; LCx: Left Circumflex Artery; RCA: Right Coronary Artery.

Table 4: Comparison of TIMI frame count between CSF and the control groups.

Variables cLAD-r cLAD-p LCX-r LCX-p RCA-r RCA-p Mean-r Mean-p
E -0.52 0.001 -0.63 0.001 -0.63 0.001 -0.7 0.001
E/A -0.33 0.001 -0.51 0.001 -0.46 0.001 -0.45 0.001
IRT 0.45 0.001 0.61 0.001 0.6 0.001 0.61 0.001
MPI 0.55 0.001 0.64 0.001 0.55 0.001 0.61 0.001
Right MPI 0.53 0.001 0.52 0.001 0.51 0.001 0.49 0.001
cLAD: Corrected Frame Count for Left Anterior Descending Artery; LCx: Left Circumflex Artery; RCA: Right Coronary Artery; IRT: Isovolumetric Relaxation Time; MPI: Left Ventricle Myocardial Performance Index.

Table 5: Correlations between TIMI frame count and echocardiographic parameters.

clinical-experimental-cardiology-TIMI-frame-count

Figure 1: Correlation between mean TIMI frame count and MPI.

clinical-experimental-cardiology-frame-count-RMPI

Figure 2: Correlation between mean TIMI frame count and RMPI.

Discussion

A number of studies have been conducted to assess LV function in patients with CSF [17,18]. Some authors have reported only impaired diastolic LV function, whereas others have reported both impaired diastolic and systolic LV function in CSF patients. Several mechanisms for the pathophysiology of CSF were suggested by previous studies, such as increased small vessel resistance, endothelial dysfunction, impairment of platelet function, inflammation, and increased plasma endothelin levels. Left and right ventricular studies showed small vessel disease in patients with CSF [18,19]. Supporting this, some studies have shown that spontaneous episodes of the CSF phenomenon during angiography are associated with ST elevation in the absence of large vessel spasm [19,20]. It is well known that ischemia first impairs ventricular diastolic function [20].

In this study, there were significant differences between patients with CSF and control groups as regards LV, and RV MPI and diastolic functions. Bonow et al. [21] reported that the earliest indicator of myocardial ischemia is LV relaxation disorder, a parameter of diastolic function. Sezgin et al. [22] and Tan-riverdi et al. [23] also showed that there is LV relaxation disorder in SCF patients using conventional Doppler echocardiography. Despite these studies, Nurkalem et al. [24] and Baykan et al. [25] found no LV relaxation disorder in, their study on SCF patients using the same methods. In addition, TIMI frame count for coronary arteries showed a negative correlation with LV, and RV MPI. LV MPI (Tei index) is a new echocardiographic parameter which correlates with invasive measurements and is used to evaluate both systolic and diastolic functions. It can be measured from the mitral annulus with pulsed-wave TDI and is not affected by cardiac rate, blood pressure, or ventricular geometry [26]. In coronary artery disease a prolonged MPI has been shown to be an important precursor of the disease before the development of systolic dysfunction.

As a result of this study, left ventricular diastolic functions present and impaired in coronary slow flow phenomenon and this deterioration was associated with increased TIMI frame count. Further studies with larger number of patients are needed to determine the effects of left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunctions on mortality.

Conclusion

In conclusion, it was detected that left and right ventricular diastolic functions deteriorated in the CSF phenomenon and this deterioration was associated with increased TIMI frame count.

References

  1. Sanati H, Kiani R, Shakerian F, Firouzi A, Zahedmehr A, et al. (2016) Coronary Slow Flow Phenomenon: Clinical Findings and Predictors. Res Cardiovasc Med 5: e30296.
  2. Beltrame JF, Limaye SB, Horowitz JD (2002) The coronary slow flow phenomenon-a new coronary microvascular disorder. 97: 197-202.
  3. Ulusoy RE, Yokusoglu M, Baysan O (2011) Ventricular functions, aortic elastic properties, andendothelial functions in patients with hypertensive response to treadmill exercise testing. Turk J Med Sci 41.
  4. Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Daley WL, Dodge JT, Alexander B, et al. (1996) TIMI frame count: a quantitative method of assessing coronary artery flow. Circulation 93: 879-888.
  5. Sezgin AT, Topal E, Barutcu I, Ozdemir R, Gullu H, et al. (2005) Impaired left ventricle filling in slow coronary flow phenomenon: an echo-Doppler study. Angiology 56: 397-401.
  6. Baykan M, Baykan EC, Turan S, Gedikli O, Kaplan S, et al. (2009) Assessment of left ventricular function and Tei index by tissue Doppler imaging in patients with slow coronary flow. Echocardiography 26: 1167-1172.
  7. Elsherbiny IA (2012) Left ventricular function and exercise capacity in patients with slow coronary flow. Echocardiography 29: 158-164.
  8. Dell'Italia LJ (1998) Reperfusion for right ventricular infarction. N Engl J Med 338: 978-980.
  9. Tambe AA, Demany MA, Zimmerman HA, Mascarenhas E (1972) Angina pectoris and slow flow velocity of dye in coronary arteries--a new angiographic finding. Am Heart J 84: 66-71.
  10. Sevimli S, Buyukkaya E, Gundogdu F (2007) Left ventricular function in patients with coronary slow flow: a tissue Doppler study. Arch Turk SocCardiol 35: 360-365.
  11. Nurkalem Z, Gorgulu S, Uslu N, Orhan AL, Alper AT, et al. (2009) Longitudinal left ventricular systolic function is impaired in patients with coronary slow flow. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25: 25-32.
  12. Nagueh SF, Appleton CP, Gillebert TC (2009) Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiography 10:165-193.
  13. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, et al. (2005) Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am SocEchocardiogr 18: 1440-1463.
  14. Tei C, Nishimura RA, Seward JB (1997) Noninvasive Doppler-derived myocardial performance index: correlation with simultaneous measurements of cardiac catheterization measurements. J Am SocEchocardiogr 10:169-178.
  15. Cin VG, Pekdemir H, Camsar A, Ciçek D, Akkus MN, et al. (2003) Diffuse intimal thickening of coronary arteries in slow coronary flow. Jpn Heart J 44: 907-919.
  16. Sezgin AT, Sigirci A, Barutcu I, Topal E, Sezgin N, et al. (2003) Vascular endothelial function in patients with slow coronary flow. Coron Artery Dis 14: 155-161.
  17. Kopetz V, Kennedy J, Heresztyn T, Stafford I, Willoughby SR, et al. (2012) Endothelial function, oxidative stress and inflammatory studies in chronic coronary slow flow phenomenon patients. 121: 197-203.
  18. Elsherbiny IA, Shoukry A, El Tahlawi MA (2012) Mean platelet volume and its relation to insulin resistance in non-diabetic patients with slow coronary flow. J Cardiol 59: 176-181.
  19. Fineschi M, Bravi A, Gori T (2008) The “slow coronary flow” phenomenon: evidence of preserved coronary flow reserve despite increased resting microvascular resistances. Int J Cardiol 127: 358-361.
  20. Kopetz VA, Penno MA, Hoffmann P, Wilson DP, Beltrame JF (2012) Potential mechanisms of the acute coronary syndrome presentation in patients with the coronary slow flow phenomenon-insight from a plasma proteomic approach. Int J Cardiol 156: 84-91.
  21. Acikel S, Bozkaya OA, Akdemir R (2010) The relationship between intermittent left bundle-branch block and slow coronary flow in a patient presenting with acute coronary syndrome. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 21: 595-597.
  22. Yalcin F, Thomas J (1999) Diastolic dysfunction: pathogenesis, therapy and the importance of Doppler echocardiography. Turk J Med Sci 29: 501-506.
  23. Bonow RO, Kent KM, Rosing DR, Lipson LC, Bacharach SL, et al. (1982) Improved left ventricular diastolic filling in patients with coronary artery disease after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation 66: 1159-1167.
  24. Tanriverdi H, Evrengul H, Kilic ID, Taskoylu O, Dogan G, et al. (2010) Aortic pressures, stiffness and left ventricular function in coronary slow flow phenomenon. 116: 261-267.
  25. Gaibazzi N, Petrucci N, Ziacchi V (2005) Left ventricle myocardial performance index derived either by conventional method or mitral annulus tissue-Doppler: a comparison study in healthy subjects and subjects with heart failure. J Am SocEchocardiogr 18: 1270-1276.
  26. Kang SM, Ha JW, Rim SJ, Chung N (1998) Index of myocardial performance using doppler-derived parameters in the evaluation of left ventricular function in patients with essential hypertension. Yonsei Med J 39: 446-52.
Citation: Khaled Sayed Mahmoud (2016) Left & Right Ventricular Myocardial Performance Index and it’s Relation with TIMI Frame Count in the Coronary Slow Flow Phenomenon. J Clin Exp Cardiolog 7:421.

Copyright: © 2016 Mahmoud KS. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top