Journal of Proteomics & Bioinformatics

Journal of Proteomics & Bioinformatics
Open Access

ISSN: 0974-276X

Research Article - (2015) Volume 8, Issue 11

Limited Polymorphisms between Two Whole Plastid Genomes in the Genus Zizania (Zizaniinae)

Zhiqiang Wu1,3*, Cuihua Gu2,3*, Luke R Tembrock3 and Song Ge1
1State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
2School of Landscape and Architecture, Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, Hangzhou 311300, PR China
3Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
*Corresponding Author(s): Zhiqiang Wu, Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
Cuihua Gu, School of Landscape and Architecture, Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, Hangzhou 311300, PR China

Abstract

Plastids, originated from cyanobacteria through endosymbiosis, contain their own DNA genome (plastome), and are uniparentally inherited in most of plant species. In this study, we reported the complete plastome sequence of Manchurian wild rice (Zizania latifolia) obtained by traditional Sanger sequencing and compared it with the previously published plastome of North America wild rice (Z. aquatica) from the same genus. The plastome of Z. latifolia has a total sequence length of 136,461 bp exhibiting a typical circular structure including a pair of 20,878 bp inverted repeats (IRa, b) separated by a large single-copy region (LSC) of 82,115 bp and a small single-copy region (SSC) of 12,590 bp, and it is only 97 bp longer than North America wild rice. The gene content, order, and orientation are similar to all other grass species. Four junctions in two plastome structures are exactly the same between the Zizania species. From complete genome comparisons, 744 (568, 46 and 130 for LSC, IR and SSC) substitutions are found between the two Zizania plastomes including 267 from coding regions and 477 from non-coding regions. Insertions/deletions (Indels) are mainly found in non-coding regions (136) except the only one repeat indel from coding regions in rpoC2 gene. The most informative biomarkers (rps16-trnQ, ndhF and matK) are also the most divergent between the two Zizania species. The completed plastome and comparative analyses from these two Zizania species would be as important resource for further systematic or population genetic studies in the Zizaniinae subtribe, marker assisted breeding, and plastomic transformation.

Keywords: Zizania; PCR; Plastome; Polymorphisms; Indels

Introduction

The tribe Oryzeae contains some of the most economically important species in the world. The tribe is divided into two well supported subtribes named Oryzinae and Zizaniinae [1-4]. Economically important species are found in both subtribes such as cultivated rice in Asian and African (Oryza sativa and O. glaberrima) from Oryzinae and the wild rice (Zizania latifolia and Z. aquatica) in Asia and North America from Zizaniinae [5,6]. Besides rice (Oryza sativa), many other close relatives in this tribe could provide valuable genetic resources for rice breeding and improvement. For example, Z. latifolia had been used for generating introgression lines for potential breeding applications [7,8]. Furthermore, with the development of high throughput sequencing technologies, more species in the Oryza genus have been completed their whole genomes [9-13]. These progresses have made the tribe Oryzeae as an ideal system to study genomic evolution [14-16].

Now, in Oryzinae, numerous plastid genomes have been completely sequenced [17,18], however, the finished plastomes from subtribe of Zizaniinae are limited. Zizania is a small genus only comprised of four species including Z. palustris, Z. aquatica, and Z. texana native to North America, and one species Z. latifolia widely distributed in Eastern Asia [19]. As the only species native to Asia, Z. latifolia, named Manchurian wild rice, is used as a food plant with both the stem and grain being consumed in several Asian countries. As a relative of rice, Zizania could be an important genetic resource in rice breeding and genetic transformation [7]. Plastid transformation can accelerate genetic modifications, and therefore, the finished plastomes are particularly important genetic resource in developing improved rice varieties. Plastomes have been shown to be a very effective targets in genomic transformation with fewer concerns regarding gene flow into wild or non-transformed individuals [20].

Plastomes, similar to animal mitochondrial genomes, maintain a conserved circular double-stranded DNA structure, with sizes ranging from 115 to 165 kb in land plants [21,22], and stable gene content and order [23]. These features of plastomes and the decreasing cost of high-throughput sequencing technologies have led to an increase in the number of completed plastomes. At present, more than 900 species’ completed plastomes are currently available in the NCBI database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/). Besides being an effective tool for genetic transformation [24,25], complete plastomes are also important resources to explore the genetic and evolutionary variation between plant groups. For example, as a primary source for plant molecular systematic and taxonomic studies, plastomes have provided strong phylogenetic signals at multiple levels of inquiry [17,26-28]. For instance, the markers from plastomes have been used to explore the biogeographical relationships among plant populations [27,29] and for DNA barcoding [24,25].

In this study, we combined the traditional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Sanger sequencing methods to fully sequence and assemble the whole plastome of Z. latifolia. We conducted comprehensive comparisons with Z. aquatica [30] and other rice species to infer what evolutionary changes have occurred within the Oryzeae tribe. The finished plastome of Z. latifolia will provide important genetic information for plastid transformation involved with crop improvement.

Materials and Methods

Complete plastid genome sequence of Zizania latifolia

Fresh leaves of Zizania latifolia were collected from plants grown in the greenhouse of the Institute of Botany of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing. Total cellular DNA was extracted using the cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) method [31] and purified with phenol extraction to remove proteins. With PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing methods, we completely sequenced the plastid genome (plastome) of Z. latifolia. For sequencing Z. latifolia, a full set of primers was designed based on two previously sequenced bamboo plastomes [17,32]. PCR amplification and purification of the products were performed, as described in Tang et al. [3]. The purified products were directly sequenced on an ABI 3730 automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The sequences were assembled with the ContigExpress program from the Vector NTI Suite 6.0 (Informax Inc., North Bethesda, MD).

Plastid genome annotation and drawing

The fully assembled plastid genome of Z. latifolia was annotated using the DOGMA (Dual Organellar GenoMe Annotator, [33]). The first draft annotation from the DOGMA output was subsequently manually inspected and adjusted for accurate assessment of the start and stop codons and the exon–intron boundaries of genes. Both tRNA and rRNA genes were identified by BLASTN searches against the database of chloroplast genomes from NCBI. The final annotations were plotted as a circular genome by the bioinformatics tools circos 0.67 [34] (Figure 1). For comparison, we download the published plastid genomes from five species in Oryzeae and one bamboo species [17,35].

proteomics-bioinformatics-chloroplast-genome-maps

Figure 1: Chloroplast genome information and variation maps of Z. latifolia (KT161956). From outside to inside, tracks depict: 1) coding genes on forward strand; 2) coding genes on reverse strand; 3) the number and distribution of substitutions (simply named as SNP) (grey bar color); 4) the number and distribution of non-repeat insertion/deletions (Indels) (green bar color); 5) the number and distribution of poly structures (grey bar color); 6) the number and distribution of repeat Indels (green bar color). The coding genes are colored based on functional group with different color codes at the bottom. Maps were generated with software Circos v0.67.

Dynamic variation of junction regions in plastid genome

Based on the configuration of the plastid genome with the two inverted repeat regions (IRA and IRB) and the two single copy regions (LSC and SSC) [36,37], four junctions named as JLA, JLB, JSA, and JSB are located between the two single copy (LSC and SSC) regions and the two IRs (IRA and IRB) [38]. The dynamic variation at the four junction regions (JLA, JLB, JSA, and JSB) can contribute to the size variation of plastid genomes [39,40]. The detailed IR border positions and the distance with adjacent genes among seven grass species plastomes (Oryza sativa ssp. japonica [AY522330], O. australiensis [KJ830774], Leersia tisserantii [JN415112], Z. latifolia [in this study], Z. aquatica [KJ870999], Rhynchoryza subulata [JN415114], Phyllostachys propinqua [JN415113]) were therefor e compared in this work.

Polymorphism analysis from coding and non-coding regions

To comprehensively compare the complete plastomes of two Zizania species, we employed the mVISTA program under the Shuffle-LAGAN mode [41] to detect whole genome variation with the plastome of O. sativa ssp. japonica (AY522330) as the reference. To identify the polymorphic regions that may be highly informative for phylogenetic or population genetic analyses from the two Zizania plastid genomes, we divided the whole plastid genome as coding and non-coding regions. Excluding the non-variation of the RNA genes, all protein coding genes were separately analyzed as coding regions, and all intron and intergenic regions were examined as non-coding regions (only the sequence longer than 200 bp were used in this analysis). These regions were extracted by using custom PERL scripts from the whole plastid genome and aligned using ClustalW under MEGA6 [42] and adjusted manually using the similarity criterion [43] for non-coding regions or preserving the reading frames for coding regions. The aligned sequences were used to calculate the sequence identity values (SI) by using BioEdit software [44] and the number of the polymorphic sites were reported from DnaSP v5.10 [45]. Only one part of the IRs regions was used in this process given the identical nature of the other repeat.

Phylogenetic analysis

To determine the phylogenic relationships among the six Oryzeae species and outgroup bamboo species, as whole plastomes alignment was used to build phylogenetic tree. Based on the collinearity of the whole plastid is extremely conserved among grass family [17,46], the whole plastomes of seven species were aligned in MAFFT v7.221 [47] under the FFT-NS-2 setting, followed by manual adjustment based on the similarity criterion [43]. Three different phylogenetic-inference methods were used to infer relationships: maximum parsimony analysis was implemented in PAUP* 4.0b10 [48], Bayesian inference (BI) in MrBayes 3.1.2 [49] and Neighbor-Joining (NJ) in MEGA6 [42] by applying the settings from Wu et al., [37].

Results and Discussion

Sequencing, assembly and annotation

Compared with the low-cost and high-throughput next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, PCR and Sanger sequencing produced highly creditable results with fewer errors [37]. Meanwhile, some other features made plastid are easy to amplify including that the plastome is small but with abundant component in cellular DNA, and rates of nucleotide substitution are relatively slow [50]. By integrating the overlapped Sanger sequenced fragments (longer 100 bp) from PCR products, we successfully assembled the whole plastid genome for Z. latifolia with 136,461 bp in length by using the method from Wu et al., [32] (Figure 1). After the automatic annotation from DOGMA [33], comparative analyses, and manual verification, the annotated plastid genome of Z. latifolia was uploaded to GenBank with accession KT161956 (Figure 1). It is composed of two single-copy regions separated by a pair of inverted repeats (IR) of 20,878 bp each, which account for 30.60% of the whole plastid genome. The large single copy (LSC) and the small single copy (SSC) regions span 82,115 bp and 12,590 bp, respectively. The proportion of LSC and SSC length in the total plastid genome is 60.17% and 9.23% respectively, and those features were all extremely similar with the other six published plastomes (Table 1). The same gene content, gene number and gene order among the seven species reflects the highly conserved plastomes of Poaceae [46,51]. The size differences among plastomes are mainly a result of the variation within intergenic sequences.

Subfamily Species Total size  LSC region IR region SSC region Gene Content GenBank Accession
Length (bp) GC (%) Length (bp) GC (%) Length (bp) GC (%) Length (bp) GC (%)
Ehrhartoideae Oryza sativa ssp. japonica 134,551 39.00 80,604 37.11 20,802 44.35 12,343 33.37 the same AY522330
  Oryza australiensis 134,549 38.98 80,614 37.07 20,796 44.36 12,343 33.25 the same GU592209
  Leersia tisserantii 136,550 38.88 81,865 37.01 21,329 44.05 12,027 33.23 the same JN415112
  Zizania latifolia 136,461 39.00 82,115 37.13 20,878 44.42 12,590 33.18 the same  KT161956a
  Zizania aquatica 136,364 39.02 82,013 37.14 20,879 44.41 12,593 33.31 the same KJ870999
  Rhynchoryza subulata 136,303 39.00 82,029 37.14 20,840 44.36 12,594 33.40 the same JN415114
Bambusoideae Phyllostachys propinqua 139,704 38.88 83,227 36.96 21,800 44.23 12,877 33.14 the same JN415113
aSequenced in this study.                    

Table 1: Comparison of major features of seven Poaceae plastome.

Polymorphisms between the two Zizania plastomes

Discovery of polymorphisms between plastomes are the basis of marker selection in plant systematic or barcoding research [24,52], in addition, discovery of sites with limited variation could be the candidates of plastid transformation [20]. We conducted the following genome wide and local specific analysis to fully investigate the polymorphisms variation between two Zizania plastomes.

First, based on the conserved features of the land plant plastomes [22], the polymorphisms were discovered from the whole genome alignment of two Zizania plastomes and categorized as either substitutions (for simply named as SNPs) or insertions/deletions (Indels, Table 2). From the results (Table S1 and S2), we found that the large single copy (LSC) regions possessed the most variable sites (568 SNPs and 124 Indels), and the two inverted repeats (IR) contained the least variable sites (46 SNPs and 6 Indels). However, when we consider the number of variable sites per kilo base pairs (kbp), the small single copy (SSC) region was the highest with 10.3 substitutions/ kbp, and 6.9 and 2.2 for the LSC and IR. This result was the same as the evolutionary rate variation among the three regions [53]. When comparing polymorphisms between coding and non-coding regions, the non-coding regions contained the most variable sites in the LSC and IR regions, but in SSC, the number of SNPs was higher in coding regions. This result shows that in LSC and SSC regions, the rate of variation between coding and non-coding is different.

Type Region Coding Regions Non-Coding Regions Sum
SNP LSC 189 379 568
IR 8 38 46
SSC 70 60 130
Total 267 477 744
  Region Indel Poly Repeat Indel Poly Repeat  
Indel LSC 0 0 1 28 63 32 124
IR 0 0 0 0 6 0 6
SSC 0 0 0 2 3 2 7
Total 0 0 1 30 72 34 137

Table 2: The number of polymorphisms in different regions by comparison from two Zizania plastome.

Second, for comparison the whole genome variation within the two Zizania plastomes, we also employed the mVISTA program [41]. We used O. sativa ssp. japonica (AY522330) as the reference for these comparisons (Figure 2). In regards to structural differences, the organization of the plastome was conserved between the two Zizania species with no differing translocations or inversions found. The two IR regions were more conserved than the LSC and SSC regions with 99.8% similarity found between them, and the coding regions were more conserved than non-coding regions (by the view from different colors). The most variation from coding regions was found in the rpoC2 gene (Figure 3). After the alignment of the amino acid (AA) sequence of rpoC2, the variable regions were focused around 650 to 820 AA. The length of this gene was different in all seven species surveyed and was mainly caused by size variation of repeat sequence within rpoC2. For the two Zizania species, there was one only 7 AA deletion around position 680 found in Z. aquatica. Among the non-coding regions (the pink portions in Figure 2), ndhC-trnV, rps16-trnQ and ycf3-trnS demonstrated the most divergent patterns between the two Zizania species.

proteomics-bioinformatics-chloroplast-genomes-protein

Figure 2: Identity plot that compares the chloroplast genomes of the two Zizania data sets used in this study with O. sativa ssp. Japonica (AY522330) as the reference sequence. The vertical scale indicates the percentage of identity to the reference, ranging from 50% to 100%. The horizontal axis indicates the coordinated base position within the chloroplast genome. Genome regions are color coded as protein-coding, RNA (rRNA and tRNA), intron, and conserved noncoding regions.

proteomics-bioinformatics-alignment-amino-acid

Figure 3: Partial alignment of amino acid from rpoC2 gene indicating the length variation caused by the repeat sequences in seven grass species.

Third, to examine the sequence identity (SI value) of the two Zizania plastomes, the whole plastome was divided into individual coding (gene regions) and non-coding (intergenic and intronic regions). Among 76 annotated protein coding genes (Table S3), which were the same in gene content as other grass species[17], the SI values for the two Zizania species were all larger than 98% with the average value for SI being 99.5% with 23 genes showing no variation. These results showed that all coding genes were extremely conserved between two Zizania species. However, the genes matK, ndhF and rpoC2 possessed the lowest SI values, and these regions have been used as universal markers in barcoding and phylogenetic studies [54], which also show phylogenetic signal at lower taxonomic levels. For the SI values from 126 non-coding regions (only one copy of IR regions was used) (Table S4), we found that the average SI values across all non-coding regions longer than 200 bp was 97.9% and was only a little lower than coding regions. Only three regions (ndhC-trnV, rps16-trnQ and ycf3-trnS) had SI values lower than 90%. Rps16-trnQ had the greatest number of polymorphic sites and as such was also an important marker for plant systematic studies [54].

Conserved variation of two Zizania plastome junction boundaries

Based on the quadripartite structure of plastomes from most land plants [22] (Figure 4A), four junctions (JLA, JLB, JSA, and JSB) were named between the two IRs (IRa and IRb) and the two single copy (LSC and SSC) regions (Figure 4C) [38]. It has already been shown that the dynamic variation of IR regions can contribute to the size variation between plastomes [22] and as such provide useful phylogenetic signals [38]. By combining the phylogenetic relationships among the seven grass species plastomes species (Figure 4B) and applying the distance between border position and the adjacent genes, we were able to compare the gene distance in a phylogenetic context (Figure 4C). By comparison with the variation from the Oryza genus [37], the two species of Zizania retained the same distance around the four junctions (Figure 3B). This indicates that the distance between gene and junction border is more conserved in Zizania than Oryza. We also examined the difference at gene distance to junction between the two subtribes. The distance of JSA and JSB reflects the variation of the two Oryzeae subtribes from this plastome feature. In subtribe Zizaniinae, the two genes distance from JSB is 319 bp (rps15) and 89-93 bp (ndhF). However, in subtribe Oryzinae, those distances were 301 bp and 41-42 bp (except for L. tisserantii). This feature could be used as a marker to separate the two subtribes. In total, the junction in JLA and JLB are more conserved than JSA and JSB.

proteomics-bioinformatics-plastomes-chloroplast-genome

Figure 4: The junction variation among seven grass plastomes. (A) Simplified schematic diagram structure of typical chloroplast genome of land plant; (B) Phylogenetic tree was built using the whole genome sequence data with three different methods including maximum parsimony (MP), Bayesian inference (BI) and Neighbor-Joining (NJ) of seven grass species. All branches with no number means 100 bootstrap values or 1.0 posterior probability; (C) Comparisons of border distances between adjacent genes and junctions of LSC, SSC, and two IR regions among seven grass plastomes. Boxes above or below the main line indicate the adjacent border genes. The figure is not to scale with sequence length and only shows relative changes at or near the IR/SC borders.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30990240). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  1. Ge S, Li A, Lu BR, Zhang SZ, Hong DY (2002) A phylogeny of the rice tribe Oryzeae (Poaceae) based on matK sequence data. Am J Bot 89: 1967-1972.
  2. Guo YL, Ge S (2005) Molecular phylogeny of Oryzeae (Poaceae) based on DNA sequences from chloroplast, mitochondrial, and nuclear genomes. Am J Bot 92: 1548-1558.
  3. Tang L, Zou XH, Achoundong G, Potgieter C, Second G, et al. (2010) Phylogeny and biogeography of the rice tribe (Oryzeae): evidence from combined analysis of 20 chloroplast fragments. Mol Phylogenet Evol 54: 266-277.
  4. Tang L, Zou XH, Zhang LB, Ge S4 (2015) Multilocus species tree analyses resolve the ancient radiation of the subtribe Zizaniinae (Poaceae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 84: 232-239.
  5. Johnson E (1969) Archeological evidence for utilizaton of wild rice. Science 163: 276-277.
  6. Vaughan DA (1994) The wild relatives of rice: a genetic resources handbook. 1994.
  7. Dong ZY, Wang YM, Zhang ZJ, Shen Y, Lin XY, et al. (2006) Extent and pattern of DNA methylation alteration in rice lines derived from introgressive hybridization of rice and Zizania latifolia Griseb. Theor Appl Genet 113: 196-205.
  8. Dong Z, Wang H, Dong Y, Wang Y, Liu W, et al. (2013) Extensive microsatellite variation in rice induced by introgression from wild rice (Zizania latifolia Griseb.). PLoS One 8: e62317.
  9. Goff SA, Ricke D, Lan TH, Presting G, Wang R, et al. (2002) A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica). Science 296: 92-100.
  10. Yu J, Hu S, Wang J, Wong GK, Li S, et al. (2002) A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica). Science 296: 79-92.
  11. Kim H, Hurwitz B, Yu Y, Collura K, Gill N, et al. (2008) Construction, alignment and analysis of twelve framework physical maps that represent the ten genome types of the genus Oryza. Genome Biol 9: R45.
  12. Wang M, Yu Y, Haberer G, Marri PR, Fan C, et al. (2014) The genome sequence of African rice (Oryza glaberrima) and evidence for independent domestication. Nat Genet 46: 982-988.
  13. Zhang QJ, Zhu T, Xia EH, Shi C, Liu YL, et al. (2014) Rapid diversification of five Oryza AA genomes associated with rice adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111: E4954-4962.
  14. Zou XH, Zhang FM, Zhang JG, Zang LL, Tang L, et al. (2008) Analysis of 142 genes resolves the rapid diversification of the rice genus. Genome Biol 9: R49.
  15. Ai B, Wang ZS, Ge S (2012) Genome size is not correlated with effective population size in the Oryza species. Evolution 66: 3302-3310.
  16. Jacquemin J, Ammiraju JS, Haberer G, Billheimer DD, Yu Y, et al. (2014) Fifteen million years of evolution in the Oryza genus shows extensive gene family expansion. Mol Plant 7: 642-656.
  17. Wu ZQ, Ge S (2012) The phylogeny of the BEP clade in grasses revisited: evidence from the whole-genome sequences of chloroplasts. Mol Phylogenet Evol 62: 573-578.
  18. Wambugu PW, Brozynska M, Furtado A, Waters DL, Henry RJ1 (2015) Relationships of wild and domesticated rices (Oryza AA genome species) based upon whole chloroplast genome sequences. Sci Rep 5: 13957.
  19. Xu XW, Wu JW, Qi MX, Lu QX, Lee PF, et al. (2015) Comparative phylogeography of the wild-rice genus Zizania (Poaceae) in eastern Asia and North America. Am J Bot 102: 239-247.
  20. Bock R1 (2015) Engineering plastid genomes: methods, tools, and applications in basic research and biotechnology. Annu Rev Plant Biol 66: 211-241.
  21. Palmer JD (1985) Comparative organization of chloroplast genomes. Annu Rev Genet 19: 325-354.
  22. Ravi V, Khurana JP, Tyagi AK, Khurana P (2008) An update on chloroplast genomes. Plant Syst Evol 271: 101-122.
  23. Wicke S, Schneeweiss GM, dePamphilis CW, Müller KF, Quandt D (2011) The evolution of the plastid chromosome in land plants: gene content, gene order, gene function. Plant Mol Biol 76: 273-297.
  24. Group CPBOL, Li DZ, Gao LM, Li HT, Wang H, et al. (2011) Comparative analysis of a large dataset indicates that internal transcribed spacer (ITS) should be incorporated into the core barcode for seed plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 19641-19646.
  25. Day A, Goldschmidt-Clermont M (2011) The chloroplast transformation toolbox: selectable markers and marker removal. Plant Biotechnol J 9: 540-553.
  26. Wang L, Qi X, Xiang Q, Heinrichs J, Schneider H, Zhang X (2010) Phylogeny of the paleotropical fern genus Lepisorus (Polypodiaceae, Polypodiopsida) inferred from four chloroplast DNA regions. Mol Phylogenet Evol 54: 211-225.
  27. Wang L, Wu ZQ, Bystriakova N, Ansell SW, Xiang QP, et al. (2011) Phylogeography of the Sino-Himalayan fern Lepisorus clathratus on "the roof of the world". PLoS One 6: e25896.
  28. Jansen RK, Cai Z, Raubeson LA, Daniell H, dePamphilis CW, et al. (2007) Analysis of 81 genes from 64 plastid genomes resolves relationships in angiosperms and identifies genome-scale evolutionary patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 19369-19374.
  29. Wang L, Schneider H, Zhang XC, Xiang QP (2012) The rise of the Himalaya enforced the diversification of SE Asian ferns by altering the monsoon regimes. BMC Plant Biol 12: 210.
  30. Wysocki WP, Clark LG, Attigala L, Ruiz-Sanchez E, Duvall MR5 (2015) Evolution of the bamboos (Bambusoideae; Poaceae): a full plastome phylogenomic analysis. BMC Evol Biol 15: 50.
  31. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19: 11-15.
  32. Wu FH, Kan DP, Lee SB, Daniell H, Lee YW, et al. (2009) Complete nucleotide sequence of Dendrocalamus latiflorus and Bambusa oldhamii chloroplast genomes. Tree Physiol 29: 847-856.
  33. Wyman SK, Jansen RK, Boore JL (2004) Automatic annotation of organellar genomes with DOGMA. Bioinformatics 20: 3252-3255.
  34. Krzywinski M, Schein J, Birol I, Connors J, Gascoyne R, et al. (2009) Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res 19: 1639-1645.
  35. Wu ZQ, Ge S (2014) The whole chloroplast genome of wild rice (Oryza australiensis). Mitochondrial DNA 1-2.
  36. Palmer JD (1983) Chloroplast DNA exists in two orientations. Nature 301: 92-93.
  37. Wu Z, Tembrock LR, Ge S3 (2015) Are differences in genomic data sets due to true biological variants or errors in genome assembly: an example from two chloroplast genomes. PLoS One 10: e0118019.
  38. Wang RJ, Cheng CL, Chang CC, Wu CL, Su TM, et al. (2008) Dynamics and evolution of the inverted repeat-large single copy junctions in the chloroplast genomes of monocots. BMC Evol Biol 8: 36.
  39. Palmer JD, Nugent JM, Herbon LA (1987) Unusual structure of geranium chloroplast DNA: A triple-sized inverted repeat, extensive gene duplications, multiple inversions, and two repeat families. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 84: 769-773.
  40. Nazareno AG, Carlsen M, Lohmann LG1 (2015) Complete Chloroplast Genome of Tanaecium tetragonolobum: The First Bignoniaceae Plastome. PLoS One 10: e0129930.
  41. Frazer KA, Pachter L, Poliakov A, Rubin EM, Dubchak I (2004) VISTA: computational tools for comparative genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 32: W273-279.
  42. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30: 2725-2729.
  43. Simmons MP1 (2004) Independence of alignment and tree search. Mol Phylogenet Evol 31: 874-879.
  44. Eckert AJ, Hall BD (2006) Phylogeny, historical biogeography, and patterns of diversification for Pinus (Pinaceae): phylogenetic tests of fossil-based hypotheses. Mol Phylogenet Evol 40: 166-182.
  45. Librado P, Rozas J (2009) DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25: 1451-1452.
  46. Cotton JL, Wysocki WP, Clark LG, Kelchner SA, Pires JC, et al. (2015) Resolving deep relationships of PACMAD grasses: a phylogenomic approach. BMC Plant Biol 15: 178.
  47. Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 30: 772-780.
  48. Swofford DL (2002) PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods).
  49. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, et al. (2012) MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol 61: 539-542.
  50. Clegg MT, Gaut BS, Learn GH Jr, Morton BR (1994) Rates and patterns of chloroplast DNA evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91: 6795-6801.
  51. Michelangeli FA, Davis JI, Stevenson DW (2003) Phylogenetic relationships among Poaceae and related families as inferred from morphology, inversions in the plastid genome, and sequence data from the mitochondrial and plastid genomes. Am J Bot 90: 93-106.
  52. Shaw J, Lickey EB, Beck JT, Farmer SB, Liu W, et al. (2005) The tortoise and the hare II: relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis. Am J Bot 92: 142-166.
  53. Walker JF, Zanis MJ, Emery NC (2014) Comparative analysis of complete chloroplast genome sequence and inversion variation in Lasthenia burkei (Madieae, Asteraceae). Am J Bot 101: 722-729.
  54. Dong W, Liu J, Yu J, Wang L, Zhou S (2012) Highly variable chloroplast markers for evaluating plant phylogeny at low taxonomic levels and for DNA barcoding. PLoS One 7: e35071.
Citation: Wu Z, Gu C, Tembrock LR, Ge S (2015) Limited Polymorphisms between Two Whole Plastid Genomes in the Genus Zizania (Zizaniinae). J Proteomics Bioinform 8: 253-259.

Copyright: © 2015 Wu Z, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top