Entomology, Ornithology & Herpetology: Current Research

Entomology, Ornithology & Herpetology: Current Research
Open Access

ISSN: 2161-0983

+44 1478 350008

Mini Review - (2016) Volume 5, Issue 1

Managing Semi-natural Habitats of Pollinators within Agro-ecosystems

Jelena Barbir*
ICA, CSIC, Calle Serrano 105bis, 28006 Madrid, Spain
*Corresponding Author: Jelena Barbir, ICA, CSIC, Calle Serrano 105bis, 28006 Madrid, Spain Email:

Abstract

Although wild pollinators are better conserved within protected areas and natural parks, where floral diversity and shelters are available, for agricultural production it is more convenient to conserve pollinators within agricultural fields. Recently, implementation of floral margins in agricultural landscapes has been shown to increase the abundance of pollinators in agro-ecosystems and positively affects production of neighbouring crops. However, special attention should be focused on the selection of beneficial insectary plants and their management in the agro-ecosystems. Therefore, this short review highlights the importance of choosing appropriate plants to attract beneficial insects and to consider their attractiveness to pollinators, ecology, physiology, floral phenology, and potential weediness prior introducing them in agro-ecosystems.

<

Introduction

Since agricultural practices can damage biodiversity through various pathways, agriculture is frequently considered anathema to conservation. However, appropriate management can ameliorate many of the negative impacts of agriculture, while largely maintaining provisioning ecosystem services [1,2]. Although honey bee has high economic importance in honey production and it is the most abundant cosmopolitan pollinator, it has been discovered that there are various crops for which honey bees are poor pollinators compared to wild bees [3,4]. For that reason, national and international organizations are publicizing the need to conserve native pollinators [3]. Moreover, honeybees are insufficient to supply the demands of crop pollination in Europe [5].

Although wild pollinators are better conserved within protected areas and natural parks, where floral diversity and shelters are available, for agricultural production it is more convenient to conserve pollinators within agricultural fields. Conventional farmers routinely manage their fields for greater provisioning services by using inputs and practices to increase yields, but management practices can also enhance other ecosystem services, such as pollination, biological control, soil fertility and structure, and support biodiversity [1]. Therefore, if introduced properly, habitat management within agro-ecosystem can provide resources needed for conservation of pollinators and natural enemies [6].

Large monocultures of bee-pollinated crops such as almond, melon, oilseed rape, alfalfa, coriander or canola [7,8], normally provide abundant food sources for pollinators, but only for a few weeks period. Therefore, lack of within field or adjacent wild plants, blooming before and after the main crops bloom, can result in a decline of healthy pollinators abundance and diversity [9]. Recently, implementation of floral margins in agricultural landscapes has been shown to increase the abundance of pollinators in agro-ecosystems [10,11]. Naturally regenerated uncropped margins were primarily designed to conserve rare local arable flora and their associated fauna [11]. However, sowing an uncropped margin with wildflower seed mixture can offer better food sources to pollinators and improve their conservation [12].

Therefore, in order to maintain native plant species in each region for pollinator conservation, there is a need for pollination biologists to integrate their findings with those of plant restoration ecologists and to ensure sustainable restoration of pollinator habitats within agro-ecosystems by using native plants [13]. For that reason, special attention should be focused on the selection of beneficial insectary plants and their management in the agro-ecosystems [14].

Beneficial Insectary Plants

Beneficial insectary plants attract beneficial insects (pollinators and natural enemies of pests) by producing nectar and pollen which are their main food sources [15]. Although many pollinators are generalist, e.g., honey bee and the majority of hoverfly species [16,17], some pollinators have preferences when choosing the plants to visit [17].

Pigmentation in flowers seems to play a major role in pollination success [18] and can significantly influence the insects’ preference [19]. In addition, colour can help beneficial insects with plant species selection, flower location and ripeness, and nectar and pollen location within the flower. Besides, shape and size of the flower [20,21], nectar availability and chemical composition of the plant species [22,23] also contribute to the preferences of pollinators.

Some plant families have been widely known as highly attractive to beneficial insects, for instance Boraginaceae, Brassicaceae and Apiaceae, and many plant species from those families have been introduced within agricultural fields worldwide. Plants as buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench (fam. Polygonaceae)) (Figure 1a), phacelia (Phacelia tanacetifolia Benth. (fam. Boraginaceae)) (Figure 1b), alyssum (Lobularia maritima L. Desv. (fam. Brassicaceae)) (Figure 1c) and coriander (Coriandrum sativum L. (fam. Apiaceae)) (Figure 1d), have been used in beneficial insect conservation practices in the last 10 years [24,25], where their attractiveness to beneficial insects have been highly ranked on the basis of feeding visit frequencies [26].

entomology-ornithology-Beneficial-insectary

Figure 1: Beneficial insectary plants [a) Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench); b) Phacelia (Phacelia tanacetifolia Benth.); c) Alyssum (Lobularia maritima L. Desv.); d) Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.)].

While it is important to consider all the factors mentioned above when choosing plants to attract beneficial insects, it is also necessary to consider the ecology, physiology, floral phenology, and potential weediness of the plants prior introducing them in agro-ecosystems [14], with the final aim to apply the most appropriate and sustainable habitat management for conservation of pollinators.

Management of Beneficial Insectary Plants within Agro-ecosystems

Although some plants can be widely attractive to cosmopolitan pollinators, other plants have flowers that are more attractive to specific groups of pollinators, e.g., open flowers are attractive to hoverflies and plants from Boraginaceae family are very attractive to bumblebees [27]. Therefore, it is important to have fundamental knowledge about the abundance and diversity of groups of pollinators in the region before choosing plant species for efficient management of pollinator habitats within the landscapes.

In addition, to manage beneficial insectary plants within agroecosystems it is essential to consider the climate conditions of the region [28]. In the Mediterranean region, where precipitation and irrigation water are scarce, usage of plant species that can cope with water stress are preferred, while in other regions, i.e., tropical, Central and Northern Europe, irrigation is not a limiting factor. Under different environmental conditions, beneficial insectary plants easily managed in one region can show weediness or invasiveness in another region. Therefore, it is recommendable to test under field conditions the agricultural behaviour and the attractiveness to pollinators of introduced or native beneficial plants [29,30] before recommending its usage in specific agro-ecosystems.

Furthermore, beneficial insectary plants can be managed in different ways within agro-ecosystems depending on the scale of the field, climate and agricultural practices of specific region [31]. One of the most common approaches to implement beneficial plants within large agricultural fields is to sow field margins. However, some plant species are more efficient if sown as mono-specific margins (Figure 2a), while others are more efficient if mixed with other plant species (Figure 2b) [32,33]. Mixed margins could combine the advantages of all species in terms of a longer flowering period and offering complementary resources relative to single species. However, mixed margins are less visited by pollinators than some highly attractive mono specific margins, which might be due to the lower floral density in mixed margins.

entomology-ornithology-Mono-specific-field

Figure 2: Sowed field margins: a) Mono-specific field margin (Phacelia tanacetifolia Benth.), b) Mixed field margin.

In addition, sustainable and organic agriculture have recently received a lot of attention as strategies that will stop or at least reduce the damage to ecosystems [34,35] and improve conservation of beneficial insects [36,37]. In organic farming, beneficial insectary plants are widely used for their positive impact in conservation of natural enemies of pests and pollinators [36]. Since the commercialization of organic products is becoming increasingly widespread, this implies an unquestionable opportunity for organic production on a small-scale, where the use of beneficial insectary plants should be a key part of the production system (Figure 3) [38].

entomology-ornithology-small-scale-gardening

Figure 3: Use of beneficial insectary plants in small-scale gardening.

Conclusion

To manage beneficial insectary plants within agro-ecosystems it is essential to consider their attractiveness to pollinators, ecology, physiology, floral phenology, and potential weediness prior introducing them in agro-ecosystems. In addition, under different environmental conditions, beneficial insectary plants easily managed in one region can show weediness or invasiveness in another region. Therefore, it is recommendable to test under field conditions the agricultural behaviour and the attractiveness to pollinators of introduced or native beneficial plants. Finally, this short review highlights the importance of choosing the most appropriate implementation of the beneficial plants in the agro-ecosystems, as mono-specific or mixed margins.

References

  1. Power AG (2010) Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies.Philos Trans R SocLond B BiolSci 365: 2959-2971.
  2. Vanbergen AJ(2013) Insect Pollinators Initiative, Threats to an ecosystem service: pressures on pollinators. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11: 251-259.
  3. Michener CD (2007)The bees of the world. The bees of the world. 2007: Johns Hopkins University Press. i-xiv, 1-972.
  4. Garibaldi LA, Steffan-Dewenter I, Winfree R, Aizen MA, Bommarco R, et al. (2013) Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance.Science 339: 1608-1611.
  5. Breeze TD, Vaissière BE, Bommarco R, Petanidou T, Seraphides N, et al, (2014) Agricultural Policies Exacerbate Honeybee Pollination Service Supply-Demand Mismatches Across Europe. Plos One 9: 8.
  6. Tscharntke T, Klein A, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I,Thies C (2005) Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity-ecosystem service management. Ecology Letters 8: 857-874.
  7. Westphal C, Steffan-Dewenter I,TscharntkeT (2003) Mass flowering crops enhance pollinator densities at a landscape scale. Ecology Letters 6: 961-965.
  8. JelenaBarbir, Francisco R. Badenes-Pérez, César Fernández-Quintanilla and José Dorado (2015) Can floral field margins improve pollination and seed production in coriander Coriandrumsativum L. (Apiaceae)? Agricultural and Forest Entomology 17: 302-308.
  9. Goulson D (2013) Effects of introduced bees on native ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 34: 1-26.
  10. Marshall EJP (2005) Field margins in northern Europe: Integrating agricultural, environmental and biodiversity functions. Field Boundary Habitats: Implications for Weed, Insect and Disease Management, ed. A.G. Thomas. Vol. 1. 2005, Quebec: Canadian Weed Science Soc, SocCanadienneMalherbologie. 39-67.
  11. Kells AR, Holland JM and Goulson D (2001)The value of uncropped field margins for foraging bumblebees. Journal of Insect Conservation 5: 283-291.
  12. Pywell RF (2011) Management to enhance pollen and nectar resources for bumblebees and butterflies within intensively farmed landscapes. Journal of Insect Conservation15: 853-864.
  13. Menz MHM (2011) Reconnecting plants and pollinators: challenges in the restoration of pollination mutualisms. Trends in Plant Science 16: 4-12.
  14. Nicholls C,Altieri MA (2013) Plant biodiversity enhances bees and other insect pollinators in agro ecosystems. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development33: 257-274.
  15. Colley MR,Luna JM (2000) Relative attractiveness of potential beneficial insectary plants to aphidophagous hoverflies (Diptera :Syrphidae). Environmental Entomology 29: 1054-1059.
  16. Branquart E,Hemptinne JL (2000) Selectivity in the exploitation of floral resources by hoverflies (Diptera :Syrphinae). Ecography23: 732-742.
  17. Frund J, Linsenmair KE,Bluthgen N (2010) Pollinator diversity and specialization in relation to flower diversity. Oikos 119: 1581-1590.
  18. Miller R, Owens SJ,Rorslett B (2011) Plants and colour: Flowers and pollination. Optics and Laser Technology 43: 282-294.
  19. Campbell DR (2012)Where have all the blue flowers gone: pollinator responses and selection on flower colour in New Zealand Wahlenbergiaalbomarginata. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 25: 352-364.
  20. Schiestl FP, Johnson SD (2013) Pollinator-mediated evolution of floral signals.Trends EcolEvol 28: 307-315.
  21. Gomez JM (2008)Spatial variation in selection on corolla shape in a generalist plant is promoted by the preference patterns of its local pollinators. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 275: 2241-2249.
  22. Baker HG, Baker I (1983) Floral nectar sugar constituents in relation to pollinator type, in Handbook of experimental pollen biology., C.E.L.R.J. Jones, Editor. 1983. pp. 117-141.
  23. Stout JC,Goulson D (2002)The influence of nectar secretion rates on the responses of bumblebees (Bombus spp.) to previously visited flowers. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 52: 239-246.
  24. Landis DA, Wratten SD, Gurr GM (2000) Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture.Annu Rev Entomol 45: 175-201.
  25. Pfiffner L,Wyss E (2004) Use of sown wildflower strips to enhance natural enemies of agricultural pests. Ecological engineering for pest management: advances in habitat manipulation for arthropods., ed. G.M. Gurr, S.D. Wratten, and M.A. Altieri. 2004: CSIRO Publishing. 165-186.
  26. Ambrosino MD (2006) Relative frequencies of visits to selected insectary plants by predatory hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae), other beneficial insects, and herbivores. Environmental Entomology 35: 394-400.
  27. Makino TT, Ohashi K, Sakai K (2007) How do floral display size and the density of surrounding flowers influence the likelihood of bumble bee revisitation to a plant? Functional Ecology 21: 87-95.
  28. Memmott J, Carvell C, Pywell RF, Craze PG (2010) The potential impact of global warming on the efficacy of field margins sown for the conservation of bumble-bees.Philos Trans R SocLond B BiolSci 365: 2071-2079.
  29. Corbet SA (2001) Native or exotic? Double or single? Evaluating plants for pollinator-friendly gardens. Annals of Botany 87: 219-232.
  30. Comba L (1999) Flowers, nectar and insect visits: Evaluating British plant species for pollinator-friendly gardens. Annals of Botany 83: 369-383.
  31. Altieri MA (1991)How best we can use biodiversity in agro ecosystems. Outlook on Agriculture 20: 15-23.
  32. Barbir J (2014)The attractiveness of flowering herbaceous plants to bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) and hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) in agro-ecosystems of Central Spain. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 17: 20-28.
  33. Pontin DR (2006) Attractiveness of single and multiple species flower patches to beneficial insects in agroecosystems. Annals of Applied Biology 148: 39-47.
  34. Andersson GK, Rundlöf M, Smith HG (2012) Organic farming improves pollination success in strawberries.PLoS One 7: e31599.
  35. Crowder DW, Northfield TD, Gomulkiewicz R, Snyderi WE (2012) Conserving and promoting evenness: organic farming and fire-based wildland management as case studies.Ecology 93: 2001-2007.
  36. Power EF,Stout JC (2011) Organic dairy farming: impacts on insect-flower interaction networks and pollination. Journal of Applied Ecology48: 561-569.
  37. Gill RJ, Ramos-Rodriguez O, Raine NE (2012) Combined pesticide exposure severely affects individual- and colony-level traits in bees. Nature491: 105-108.
  38. Markussen MV (2014) Evaluating the sustai nability of a small-scale low-input organic vegetable supply system in the United Kingdom. Sustainability 6: 913-1945.
Citation: Barbir J (2016) Managing Semi-natural Habitats of Pollinators within Agroecosystems. Entomol Ornithol Herpetol 5:171.

Copyright: © 2016 Barbir J. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top