Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Medical Devices
Open Access

Microfluidic Lab-on-a-Chip Devices for the Detection of Blood borne Infectious Diseases

Joseph Yock^{* *}Correspondence: Joseph Yock, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Stanford University, California, USA, Email:

Author info »

Description

The rise of microfluidic Lab-On-a-Chip (LOC) devices has revolutionized the field of medical diagnostics, offering new avenues for detecting blood borne infectious diseases with unprecedented speed, accuracy and portability. These innovative systems, which integrate multiple laboratory functions on a single chip, hold immense promise for healthcare, particularly in resource-limited settings where access to traditional diagnostic methods may be scarce. In this opinion, I will discuss the potential benefits, challenges and future directions of microfluidic LOC devices in the detection of blood borne infectious diseases, focusing on their role in improving diagnostic accessibility, reliability and cost-effectiveness [1]. Microfluidic LOC devices are miniature platforms capable of performing complex biochemical analyses on small volumes of fluids-such as blood-by manipulating them within tiny channels. For infectious disease diagnostics, these devices can detect pathogens, identify biomarkers and analyse genetic material in real-time [2,3]. The integration of various diagnostic processes (e.g. sample preparation, amplification, detection and analysis) onto a single chip streamlines the workflow, reducing the need for multiple pieces of equipment and trained personnel. One of the most significant advantages of microfluidic LOC devices is their ability to deliver rapid diagnostics at the Point of Care (POC). Traditionally, detecting blood borne infections like HIV, malaria or hepatitis requires sending blood samples to a laboratory, where results can take hours or even days to obtain. Microfluidic devices can cut down this waiting time, providing results within minutes, which is important for prompt treatment and reducing disease transmission [4-6]. The fast turnaround also plays an important role in outbreak management, allowing healthcare providers to quickly identify and isolate cases, reducing the spread of infection. Furthermore, the portability of these devices is an important feature, especially for use in low-resource or remote areas where traditional diagnostic laboratories may not be available. A microfluidic LOC device can easily be integrated with mobile technology, enabling healthcare professionals to transmit test results to medical experts or centralized databases, improving telemedicine capabilities [7]. This makes blood borne disease diagnostics more accessible, empowering local healthcare workers to take swift action in the management of infectious diseases [8]. Despite the remarkable potential of microfluidic LOC devices, several challenges must be addressed before they can be widely implemented in clinical settings. One key hurdle is the integration of sample preparation steps, particularly when dealing with complex blood samples. Blood is a heterogeneous fluid, containing various cells, proteins and pathogens [9]. For accurate detection, the system must be able to isolate and concentrate the target pathogen or biomarker while avoiding interference from other components in the blood. Developing microfluidic systems that can efficiently and reliably perform these complex steps in a single, automated process remains a technical challenge. Furthermore, cost remains a barrier to the widespread adoption of microfluidic technologies, particularly in low-income regions. Although microfluidic devices themselves are typically inexpensive to produce, the supporting infrastructure-such as reagent kits, testing supplies and mobile integration systems-can add to the overall cost [10]. In many low-resource settings, where healthcare budgets are tight, the cost-effectiveness of these systems must be carefully evaluated to ensure they provide tangible benefits in terms of improved health outcomes and reduced healthcare costs. Looking forward, the future of microfluidic LOC devices for detecting blood borne infectious diseases appears promising.

Conclusion

Microfluidic lab-on-a-chip devices hold immense promise for the detection of blood borne infectious diseases, offering a range of benefits including rapid, accurate and cost-effective diagnostics at the point of care. However, technical challenges related to sample preparation, sensitivity and cost must be overcome before these devices can be widely adopted. With continued advancements in materials, integration with AI and innovative multiplexing capabilities, microfluidic LOC devices have the potential to significantly improve global health outcomes by providing faster and more accessible diagnostics, particularly in resource-limited settings. As the field continues to evolve, these devices could play a pivotal role in the fight against infectious diseases, making early detection and timely treatment more accessible to populations around the world.

References

1. Wagner B, Freer H. Development of a multiplex assay for the detection of antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi in horses and its validation using bayesian and conventional statistical methods. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2011;144(3-4):374-381.

   [Crossref] [Google scholar] [Pubmed]

2. Branda JA, Wormser GP. 2-tiered antibody testing for early and late lyme disease using only an immunoglobulin G blot with the addition of a vlse band as the second-tier test. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(1):20-26.

   [Crossref] [Google scholar] [Pubmed]

3. Abdeljalil Z, Raphel A. Diagnosis and management of suspected lyme neuroborreliosis-related facial nerve palsy in children by paediatricians and general practitioners: A French survey. Eur J Pediatr. 2024;183(12):5363-5370.

   [Crossref] [Google scholar] [Pubmed]

4. Wagner B, Goodman LB. Antibodies to Ospc, Ospf and c6 antigens as indicators for infection with Borrelia burgdorferi in horses. Equine Vet J. 2013;45(5):533-537.

   [Crossref] [Google scholar] [Pubmed]

5. Owen C, Fader KA. Western blotting: Evolution of an old analytical method to a new quantitative tool for biomarker measurements. Bioanalysis.2024;16(5):319-328.

   [Crossref] [Google scholar] [Pubmed]

6. Perez GG, Juarez GI. Serological evidence of Borrelia burgdorferi infection in Mexican patients with facial palsy. Rev Invest Clin.2017;69(6):344-348.

   [Crossref] [Google scholar] [Pubmed]

7. Sahmani M, Vatanmanian M. Microchips and their significance in isolation of circulating tumor cells and monitoring of cancers. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(3):879-894.

   [Crossref] [Google scholar] [Pubmed]

8. Tanaka Y, Sato K. Biological cells on microchips: New technologies and applications. Biosens Bioelectron. 2007;23(4):449-458.

   [Crossref] [Google scholar] [Pubmed]

9. Escarpa A, Garcia M. Microchips for CE: Breakthroughs in real-world food analysis. Electrophoresis. 2008;29(24):4852-4861.

   [Crossref] [Google scholar] [Pubmed]

10. Breadmore MC, Wuethrich A. Recent advances in enhancing the sensitivity of electrophoresis and electrochromatography in capillaries and microchips (2014-2016). Electrophoresis. 2017;38(1):33-59.

    [Crossref] [Google scholar]