Fisheries and Aquaculture Journal

Fisheries and Aquaculture Journal
Open Access

ISSN: 2150-3508

+44 1478 350008

Mini Review - (2018) Volume 9, Issue 4

Mini review on Vibrio Infection-A Case Study on Vibrio harveyi Clade

Denicia Atujona1,2,3, Shuanghu Cai1,2,3* and Eric Amenyogbe1,2
1College of Fisheries, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang, Guangdong Province, China
2Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Aquaculture in the South China Sea for Aquatic Economic Animals, Zhanjiang, China
3Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Pathogenic Biology and Epidemiology for Aquatic Economic Animals, Zhanjiang, China
*Corresponding Author: Shuanghu Cai, College of Fisheries, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang, Guangdong Province, China, Tel: +8613729039109 Email:

Abstract

Pathogens respond to host immunity by secreting virulence factors which facilitate their proliferation and survival in host. Most bacteria including Vibrio harveyi coordinates gene expression by cell-cell communication termed quorum sensing. Quorum sensing (QS) involves the production, detection, and response of molecules to extracellular signals to enable bacteria monitor population density and induce specific genes in response to changes in cell number. Quorum sensing systems regulate virulence, bioluminescence, biofilm formation and antibiotic production which are necessary factors to induce infection. V. harveyi interacts inter-specially and intra-specially to overcome host defences and cause detrimental infections to a wide range of aquatic host. This review reflects the mechanism aiding infection in Vibrio species, considering V. harveyi clade.

Keywords: V. harveyi ; Quorum sensing; Virulence

Introduction

Aquaculture is one of the fastest growing food production sectors globally, with Asian aquaculture significantly contributing to total global output (http://www.fao.org). Output consistency is challenged by diseases resulting from ubiquitous opportunistic bacterial pathogens in the aquatic environment [1,2]. V. harveyi is a bioluminescent marine bacterium free- living in seawater column, adhered to abiotic surfaces, as a constituent of biofilm and in pathogenic associations with marine and estuarine organisms [3,4]. V. harveyi , among Vibrio species are short, curved rod-shaped, monotrichous, luminescent, motile marine bacterium associated with normal marine flora and pathogenic to most marine species; largely a cause of global economic losses especially to young population of aquatic vertebrates and invertebrates including shrimp and finfish [5-7].

Bacteria quorum sensing uses extracellular signals known as autoinducers (AI) to monitor population density and induce gene expression in response to cell number. Auto-inducer (AI) concentration increase and decrease proportionally with bacterial population to activate group and individual responses respectively at any given time. Understanding the mechanism of operation in Vibrio species will help device and adapt means to reduce infection incidences. Environmental conditions including water temperature and oxygen fluctuation as well as related stresses are first-hand susceptors of host to infections. Effective environmental management is therefore, a prerequisite to disease control and healthy aquaculture.

Effects of V. harveyi Infection on Mariculture

Portal of entry of V. harveyi is species dependent, in some species it enters through the mouth to forms plaques, then spread to innards, appendages and limbs. The severity of havoc is dependent on host exposure to a concentration enough to cause infection [8].

Reports exist on epizootic outbreaks by V. harveyi over a wide geographical range in marine organisms [9]. V. harveyi has been associated with massive mortalities in aquaculture in France, Japan, Australia, Korea, and China [10,11]. Communication skills of V. harveyi have been revealed with major effects of their interaction with the environment in terms of virulence expression or expression of defence mechanisms. Understanding the parameters causing the proliferation of pathogenic V. harveyi has been of immerse importance over the years in combating and reducing its infestation and impact on Maricultured organisms.

The bacterium is pathogenic to a wide range of organisms especially fish and invertebrates [5,12] and a major cause of most serious bacteria diseases, growth retardation and huge mortalities in both vertebrates and invertebrates including groupers, elasmobranches, rainbow trout, Atlantic salmon, olive flounder, black rockfish, sea bream, turbot, penaeid shrimp and bivalves. The bacterium identified to be opportunistic is associated with serious production losses in marine fish farms with a potential to eliminate a whole population of affected juvenile species [13,14] resulting in significant economic impact on the industry.

Depending on the fish species, Vibriosis affected organisms exhibit a variety of clinical signs including abnormal swimming behaviour, dark pigmentation, distended abdomen, skin ulceration, gastroenteritis, ascites, inflammation of the circulatory system or eye, skin lesions, presence of white spots on foot and inflammation of the pericardial tissue resulting in impaired mobility and septicemia in various species of vertebrates and invertebrates [15,16].

Diseases of V. harveyi include vasculitis [17,18] and luminous vibriosis. Luminous vibriosis has been a leading cause of death among commercially farmed shrimp and other aquaculture [5]. V. harveyi has been a common cause of vibriosis outbreaks in Orange spotted grouper (Epinephelus coioides ) in the Guangdong province of China since 2008 [19]. In European abalone Haliotis tuberculata , V. harveyi has been responsible for massive mortalities during summer spawning period both in natural populations and farmed stocks [11].

Pathogenicity of V. harveyi

Though the pathogenicity of V. harveyi is not well elucidated, some virulence indicators have been identified: Extracellular products (cysteine protease, phospholipase and haemolysin), lipopolysaccharide, bacteriophage, bacteriocin-like substance and quorum sensing factors [5]. The pathogenicity of V. harveyi is strain-dependent, reflecting a synergistic interaction between individual or coupled factors of hydrophobicity, biofilm formation, survival ability in fish skin mucus and serum, and the proteolytic, hemolytic, cytotoxic activities of ECPs [20].

The life cycle of pathogenic bacteria consists of two phases; environmental phase regulated by environmental conditions and host phase characterized by virulence factors [21]. The production of virulence factors is strongly influenced by environmental conditions. Conditions that initiate bacterial infection occur in three stages: colonization, adhesion of the pathogen to host where it multiplies and penetrate to establish itself; invasion of host organs by expression of virulence factors to initiate disease; exit of pathogen and disease transmission to neighbouring host [22].

Pathogens multiply and deliver effector proteins into host to invade host defences and establish diseases. Bacterial adhesion to host surfaces is one of the initial steps in microbial pathogenesis; hydrophobicity and biofilm formation are thought to be determining factors of adhesion and survival for pathogens in host cells [20,23,24]. The cell wall of V. harveyi consists of an outer membrane of lipopolysaccharides, an important adhesion factor for host attachment [25].

Vibrio species vary in their modes of infection in different host, among these; V. anguillarum penetrates preferentially through gastrointestinal tract in turbot Scophthalmus maximus [26], through skin and gills in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar ) and rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri ) [27,28], portal of entry of Vibrio pathogens into mollusks is predicted organic matrix of the shell [29,30].

Virulence regulation in V. harveyi

Virulence of V. harveyi is predicted to be achieved by attachment mechanisms, biofilms formation, bacterial secretions and extracellular products. Vibrio bacteria pathogens and V. harveyi for that matter regulates virulence expression to initiate and maintain disease. Gene expression is regulated by population density in a process known as quorum sensing; cell-to-cell communication, effected by "hormone like" organic compounds, signal molecules known as autoinducers (AIs). V. harveyi integrates AI signals of different strength and unique encoding information about neighbouring species content in a phosphor relay signaling system [31].

Bacterial densities are influenced by multiple factors including nutrients, temperature, osmotic strength, pH and oxygen concentration, with maximal growths at optimal conditions of species and strains [32] for example increased bacteria concentration facilitates virulence. The mechanisms of quorum sensing are dependent on signal peptide regulation of LuxO. AI-1 and AI-2 are signal molecules [33,34] involved in LuxO phosphorylation and dephosphorylation. AIs switch intermittently between individual and group existence mechanisms at low and high population densities respectively to produce and preserve bacterial virulence. Phosphorylation of LuxO occurs at low signal molecule concentration due to low bacteria density to activate the expression of genes that repress the production of master transcriptional regulator protein LuxR mRNA. Increased signal molecules as a result of rise in bacteria cell density terminates the expression of master transcriptional regulator protein LuxR repressive or inhibitory genes, dephosphorylate LuxO and translate luxR mRNA [35-38]. Gene expression regulation results in secretion of effector proteins that allow pathogens infect and damage their host.

Quorum sensing facilitates the production, secretion, and detection of virulence mechanisms in a wide range of bacteria strains in which it is conserved [7]. Quorum sensing influences virulence of most pathogens with type III secretion systems [39,40]. To regulate activities of virulence, antibiotic production, biofilm formation, symbiosis, motility, conjugation and bioluminescence, V. harveyi utilizes AI signals for intra-species communication (AI-1) and interspecies communication (AI-2) [41,42]. AI-2 functions as a broad-spectrum antibiotic which disrupts quorum-sensing systems, a potential for development of synthetic inhibitors to disrupt virulence factors along communication pathways [43].

Bioluminescence in V. harveyi: Bioluminescence is a biological process of light production and emission. Though the mechanism of bioluminescence is not well elucidated, luminescence is found in symbiotic, saprophytic, parasitic, as well as in free-living bacteria [44]. Bioluminescence is regulated by a signaling pathway in response to cell density. Signaling result in production of luciferase, an enzyme that generates light in the visible range causing bacterial glow in response to activated quorum sensing pathways [3]. Most bioluminescent organisms are resident in oceans, where they emit light for biological activities including attraction of prey or to find food, to attract mates and escape predators, also aids intra-species communication among bacteria population [45-48].

Bioluminescence is important for efficient DNA repair, an evolutionary drive for luminescent bacteria due to its inefficient DNA repair; non-luminescent bacteria on the other hand have efficient DNA repair systems [49]. V. harveyi luminescence stimulates DNA repair by activation of photoreactivation process, indicative of DNA repair stimulation being an evolutionary drive for bacterial luminescence [50]. Origin of bioluminescence is considered a problematic question of the Charles Darwin theory of evolution [51] because its function is believed to have direct association with visual behaviour of organisms, raising questions about its attributed benefits to organisms with weak luminescent systems. Bioluminescence in V. harveyi protects bacteria against oxidative stress [52].

Unless a selective pressure is provided luminescence is disadvantageous to bacteria due to high cell energy requirement to emit radiation, efficient system development requires positive environmental pressure to select individuals bearing more and more effective systems among whole populations [49]. A conclusion can be reached that V. harveyi bioluminescence stimulation of DNA repair improves pathogenic efficiency against their host under selective pressure.

Biofilm formation in V. harveyi: Biofilm is critical for the survival and persistence of V. harveyi and its infection. Biofilms are complex, multicellular bacterial communities adhered to surfaces and threatening host immune systems, causing economic and health problems [53,54]. A biofilm is formed by bacterial cell attachment to surfaces, micro-colonies formation and further maturation into biofilm, their structural basis are composed of proteins, nucleic acids, lipids and exopolysaccharides [55,56]. Exopolysaccharides are virulence factors which protect bacteria from the environment and host immunity [57]. Biofilm association with quorum sensing aids neighbouring cell communication over short distances among bacteria population [58,59].

Biofilm formation protects bacteria against antibacterial agents [60], biofilm formation occurs in the presence of the antibiotics tetracycline and chloramphenicol [61]. This is an advantage for bacteria to express virulence mechanism and infect host in the occasion of antibiotic use. The importance of biofilm and its resistance to antibiotics limit effectiveness of antibiotics treatment against pathogens and make it imperative to search alternatives to antimicrobials.

Antibiotic Resistance-An Advantage to Bacteria

Several strategies have been attempted to control bacteria diseases, however, the rate of destruction remains alarming in most environments due to factors including antibiotic resistance. Disease maintenance with antibiotics proved effective against a reasonable range of bacteria, leading to its widespread in aquatic systems; building up chemical residues in useful microorganisms to deteriorate the environmental [62,63]. Regular and continuous use of high doses of antibiotics increased its concentration in culture environments, limiting its effectiveness and conferring resistance as well as resistance transfer to other bacteria [64]. Bacteria develop resistance to antibiotics overtime expressed by chromosomal genes or acquired through mutation of plasmids and transposons; bacteria survive stress from antibiotics and respond by development and improvement of adaptive measures to new environments, mutation inactivates or modifies antibiotics to reduce drug accumulation and permeability [65]. A resistant bacterium survives and persists in the presence of antimicrobial agents in concentrations subjective to infection.

Conclusion

Aquaculture supplements depleting wild catch and must be protected against disease of which bacteria Vibrios are a leading cause. Quorum sensing regulated mechanisms influence virulence of vibrio pathogens and its components may be targeted to curb the devastating effects of quorum sensing bacterial infection.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by Fishing Port Construction and Fishery Development Funds of Guangdong Province (Prevention of Fish Disease), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. 2017A030307033 )

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Subasinghe R (2009) Disease control in aquaculture and the responsible use of veterinary drugs and vaccines: the issues, prospects and challenges. In : C.Rogers, (ed.), B. Basurco, , (ed.) 2009. The use of veterinary drugs and vaccines in Mediterranean aquaculture. Zaragoza: CIHEAM pp: 5-11.
  2. Mishra SS, Das R, Choudhary P, Debbarma J, Sahoo SN, et al. (2017) Present status of Fisheries and Impact of Emerging Diseases of Fish and Shellfish in Indian Aquaculture. J Aquat Res Mar Sci 2017: 5-26.
  3. Nealson KH, Hastings JW (1979) Bacterial bioluminescence: its control and ecological significance. Microbiol Rev 43: 496-518.
  4. Thompson FL, Iida T, Swings J (2004) Biodiversity of Vibrios. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 68: 403-431.
  5. Austin B, Zhang XH (2006) Vibrio harveyi: a significant pathogen of marine vertebrates and invertebrates. Letters in Applied Microbiology 43: 119-124.
  6. Defoirdt T, Boon N, Sorgeloos P, Verstraete W, Bossier P (2007) Alternatives to antibiotics to control bacterial infections: luminescent vibriosis in aquaculture as an example. Trends Biotechnol 25: 472-479.
  7. Liu H, Srinivas S, He X, Gong G, Dai C, et al. (2013) Quorum Sensing in Vibrio and its Relevance to Bacterial Virulence. J Bacteriol Parasitol 4: 172.
  8. Bradley PJ,  Bacharier BL, Bonfiglio J, Schechtman BK, Strunk R, et al. (2005) Severity of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Bronchiolitis Is Affected by Cigarette Smoke Exposure and Atopy Pediatrics 115: e7-e14.
  9. Zhang XH, Austin B (2000) Pathogenicity of Vibrio harveyi to salmonids. J Fish Dis 23: 93-102.
  10. Sawabe T, Inoue S, Fukui Y, Yoshie K, Nishihara Y, et al. (2007) Mass Mortality of Japanese Abalone Haliotis discus hannai Caused by Vibrio harveyi Infection. Microbes Environ 22: 300-308.
  11. Travers MA, Barbou A, Le GoAc N, Huchette S, Nicolas Jl, et al. (2009) Influence of temperature and spawning effort onHaliotis tuberculatamortalities caused byVibrio harveyi: an example of emerging vibriosis linked to global warming. Glob Chang Biol 15: 1365-1376.
  12. Cano-Gomez A, Hoj L, Owens L, Andreakis N (2011) Andreakis, Multilocus sequence analysis provides basis for fast and reliable identification of Vibrio harveyi-related species and reveals previous misidentification of important marine pathogens. Syst Appl Microbiol 34: 561-565.
  13. Haldar S, Maharajan A, Chatterjee S, Hunter S, Chowdhury N, et al. (2010) Identification of Vibrio harveyi as a causative bacterium for a tail rot disease of sea bream Sparus aurata from research hatchery in Malta. Microbiological Research 165: 639-648.
  14. Ransangan J, Lal MT, Al-Harbi AH (2012) Characterization and Experimental Infection of Vibrio harveyi Isolated from Diseased Asian Seabass (Lates calcarifer). Malays J Microbiol 8: 104-115.
  15. Travers MA, Barbou A, Le GoAc N, Huchette S, Paillard C, et al. (2008) Construction of a stable GFP-taggedVibrio harveyistrain for bacterial dynamics analysis of abalone infection. FEMS Microbiol Lett  289: 34-40.
  16. Austin B (2010) Vibrios as causal agents of zoonoses. Vet Microbiol 140: 310-317.
  17. Chabrillon M, Rico RM, Arijo S, Diaz-Rosales P, Balebona MC, et al. (2005) Interactions of microorganisms isolated from gilthead sea bream, Sparus aurata L., on Vibrio harveyi, a pathogen of farmed Senegalese sole, Solea senegalensis (Kaup). J Fish Dis 28: 531-537.
  18. Pujalte M, Sitja-Bobadilla A, Macian M, Belloch C, Alvarez-Pellitero P, et al. (2003) Virulence and Molecular Typing of Vibrio harveyi Strains Isolated from Cultured Dentex, Gilthead Sea Bream and European Sea Bass. Syst Appl Microbiol 26: 284-292.
  19. Ningqiu L, Junjie B, Shuqin W, Xiaozhe F, Haihua L, Y, et al. (2008) An outer membrane protein, OmpK, is an effective vaccine candidate for Vibrio harveyi in Orange-spotted grouper (Epinephelus coioides). Fish Shellfish Immunol 25: 829-833.
  20. Won KM, Park SI (2008) Pathogenicity of Vibrio harveyi to cultured marine fishes in Korea.  Aquaculture 285: 8-13.
  21. Ruwandeepika HAD, Jayaweera TSP, Bhowmick PP, Karunasagar I, Bossier P, et al. (2012) Pathogenesis, virulence factors and virulence regulation of vibrios belonging to the Harveyi clade. Rev Aquacult 4: 59-74.
  22. Donnenberg MS (2000) Pathogenic strategies of enteric bacteria. Nature 406: 768-774.
  23. Beachey EH (1981) Bacterial Adherence: Adhesin-Receptor Interactions Mediating the Attachment of Bacteria to Mucosal Surfaces. J Infect Dis 143: 325-345.
  24. Daly JG, Stevenson RMW (1987) Hydrophobic and Haemagglutinating Properties of Renibacterium salmoninarum. Microbiology 133: 3575-3580.
  25. Cai S, Yao S, Lu Y, Wu Z, Jian J, et al. (2010) Immune response in Lutjanus erythropterus induced by the major outer membrane protein (OmpU) of Vibrio alginolyticus. Dis Aquat Organ 90: 63-68.
  26. Oisson JC, Joborn A, Westerdahl A, Blomberg L, Kjelleberg S, et al. (1996) Is the turbot, Scophthalmus maximus (L.), intestine a portal of entry for the fish pathogen Vibrio anguillarum?. J Fish Dis 19: 225-234.
  27. Laurencin FB, Germon E (1987) Experimental infection of rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri R., by dipping in suspensions of Vibrio anguillarum: ways of bacterial penetration; influence of temperature and salinity. Aquaculture 67: 203-205.
  28. Svendsen Ys, Bogwald J (1997) Influence of artificial wound and non-intact mucus layer on mortality of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salarL.) following a bath challenge withVibrio anguillarumandAeromonas salmonicida. Fish Shellfish Immunol 7: 317-325.
  29. Paillard C, Maes P (1995) The Brown Ring Disease in the Manila Clam Ruditapes philippinarum. J Invertebr Pathol 65:  91-100.
  30. Allam B, Paillard C, Ford S (2002) Pathogenicity of Vibrio tapetis, the etiological agent of brown ring disease in clams. Dis Aquat Organ 48: 221-231.
  31. Waters CM, Bassler BL (2006) The Vibrio harveyi quorum-sensing system uses shared regulatory components to discriminate between multiple autoinducers. Genes Dev 20: 2754-2767.
  32. Beste DJV, Laing E, Bonde B, Avignone-Rossa C, Bushell ME, et al. (2007) Transcriptomic Analysis Identifies Growth Rate Modulation as a Component of the Adaptation of Mycobacteria to Survival inside the Macrophage. Journal of Bacteriology 189: 3969-3976.
  33. Chen X, Schauder S, Potier N, Van Dorsselaer A, Pelczer I, et al. (2002) Structural identification of a bacterial quorum-sensing signal containing boron. Nature 415: 545-549.
  34. Higgins DA, Pomianek ME, Kraml CM, Taylor RK, Semmelhack MF, et al. (2007) The major Vibrio cholerae autoinducer and its role in virulence factor production. Nature 450: 883-886.
  35. Freeman JA, Lilley BN, Bassler BL (2000) A genetic analysis of the functions of LuxN: a two-component hybrid sensor kinase that regulates quorum sensing in Vibrio harveyi. Molecular Microbiology 35: 139-149.
  36. Lenz DH, Mok KC, Lilley BN, Kulkarni RV, Wingreen NS, et al. (2004) The Small RNA Chaperone Hfq and Multiple Small RNAs Control Quorum Sensing in Vibrio harveyi and Vibrio cholera. Cell 118: 69-82.
  37. Tu KC, Bassler BL (2007) Multiple small RNAs act additively to integrate sensory information and control quorum sensing in Vibrio harveyi. Genes Dev 21: 221-233.
  38. Waters CM, Wu JT, Ramsey ME, Harris RC, Bassler BL (2010) Control of the Type 3 Secretion System in Vibrio harveyi by Quorum Sensing through Repression of ExsA. Appl Environ Microbiol 76: 4996-5004.
  39. Defoirdt T, Boon N, Sorgeloos P, Verstraete W, Bossier P (2008) Quorum sensing and quorum quenching in Vibrio harveyi: lessons learned from in vivo work. The ISME Journal 2: 19-26.
  40. Natrah F, Ruwandeepika HD, Pawar S, Karunasagar I, Sorgeloos P, et al. (2011) Regulation of virulence factors by quorum sensing in Vibrio harveyi. Vet Microbiol 154: 124-129.
  41. Henke JM, Bassler BL (2004) Three Parallel Quorum-Sensing Systems Regulate Gene Expression in Vibrio harveyi. Journal of Bacteriology 186: 6902-6914.
  42. Waters CM, Bassler BL (2005) QUORUM SENSING: Cell-to-Cell Communication in Bacteria. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 21: 319-346.
  43. Federle MJ, Bassler BL (2003) Interspecies communication in bacteria. 112: 1291-1299.
  44. Meighen EA (1994) Genetics of Bacterial Bioluminescence. Annu Rev Genet 28: 117-139.
  45. Bassler BL, Silverman MR (1995) Intercellular Communication in Marine Vibrio Species: Density-Dependent Regulation of the Expression of Bioluminescence. Two-Component Signal Transduction pp: 431-445.
  46. Herring P, Widder E (2001) Bioluminescence. Encyclopedia of Ocean Sciences pp: 308-317.
  47. Shimomura O (2006) Bioluminescence-Chemical Principles and Methods. World scientific pp: 500.
  48. Widder EA (2010) Bioluminescence in the Ocean: Origins of Biological, Chemical and Ecological Diversity. Science 328: 704-708.
  49. Czyz A, Plata K, Weigrzyn G (2003) Stimulation of DNA repair as an evolutionary drive for bacterial luminescence. Luminescence 18: 140-144.
  50. Czyz B, Wrobel, Węgrzyn G (2000) Vibrio harveyi bioluminescence plays a role in stimulation of DNA repair. Microbiology 146: 283-288.
  51. Czyz A, Wegrzyn G (2001) On The Function And Evolution Of Bacterial Luminescence. Bioluminescence and Chemiluminescence pp. 31-34.
  52. Stabb EV (2005) Shedding light on the bioluminescence paradox. ASM News 71: 223-229.
  53. Mahenthiralingam E, Campbell ME, Speert DP (1994) Nonmotility and phagocytic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from chronically colonized patients with cystic fibrosis. Infect Immun 62: 596-605.
  54. Costerton JW (1999) Bacterial Biofilms: A Common Cause of Persistent Infections. Science 284: 1318-1322.
  55. Stoodley P, Sauer K, Davies DG, Costerton JW (2002) Biofilms as Complex Differentiated Communities. Annu Rev Microbiol 56: 187-209.
  56. Kavita K, Mishra A, Jha B (2013) Extracellular polymeric substances from two biofilm forming Vibrio species: Characterization and applications. Carbohydrate Polymers 94: 882-888.
  57. Hidalgo-Cantabrana C, Sanchez B, Milani C, Ventura M, Margolles A, et al. (2014) Genomic Overview and Biological Functions of Exopolysaccharide Biosynthesis in Bifidobacterium spp., Appl Environ Microbiol 80: 9-18.
  58. Guttenplan SB, Kearns DB (2013) Regulation of flagellar motility during biofilm formation. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 37: 849-871.
  59. Henares B, Xu Y, Boon E (2013) A Nitric Oxide-Responsive Quorum Sensing Circuit in Vibrio harveyi Regulates Flagella Production and Biofilm Formation. Int J Mol Sci 14: 16473-16484.
  60. Costerton JW, Cheng KJ, Geesey GG, Ladd TI, Nickel JC, et al. (1987) Bacterial Biofilms in Nature and Disease. Annu Rev Microbiol 41: 435-464.
  61. Otta SK, Karunasagar I (1996) Biofilm formation by Vibrio harveyi on surfaces. Aquaculture 140: 241-245.
  62. Sugita H, Asa T, Hayashi K (1992) Application of ozone disinfection to remove Enterococcus seriolicida, Pasteurella piscicida and Vibrio anguillarum from seawater. Appl Environ Microbiol 58: 4072-4075.
  63. Sivaram V, Babu M, Immanuel G, Murugadass S, Citarasu T, et al. (2004) Growth and immune response of juvenile greasy groupers (Epinephelus tauvina) fed with herbal antibacterial active principle supplemented diets against Vibrio harveyi infections. Aquaculture 237: 9-20.
  64. Chanratchakool P, Pearson M, Limsuwan C, Roberts RJ (1995) Oxytetracycline sensitivity of vibrio species isolated from diseased black tiger shrimp, Penaeus monodon fabricius. J Fish Dis 18: 79-82.
  65. Gupta PD, Birdi TJ (2017) Development of botanicals to combat antibiotic resistance. J Clin Invest 8: 266-275.
Citation: Atujona D, Cai S, Amenyogbe E (2018) Mini review on Vibrio Infection-A Case Study on Vibrio harveyi Clade. Fish Aqua J 9: 258.

Copyright: © 2018 Atujona D, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Top